Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 16:59:58 -0800 From: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@FreeBSD.org> To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Cc: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>, Victor Sudakov <vas@mpeks.tomsk.su>, FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: tap(4) and host-only networking between host and guest Message-ID: <CAG=rPVcj7Uh0WG=o2gHRPcfAc3bbH59WLCXXURWm4Y-x4HXn8w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <563BF60B.5090201@quip.cz> References: <20151104075454.GA99850@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <5639FF12.1020109@freebsd.org> <20151104131230.GA1117@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20151104184503.GC1117@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <563B8C9A.7070104@grosbein.net> <563BF60B.5090201@quip.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> wrote: > Eugene Grosbein wrote on 11/05/2015 18:06: > >> Yes, it is. And there is a solution: >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165174 >> > > I don't understand why such useful patches are left uncommited and without > any comments in PR for years. > > This is not official project policy, but in future, I recommend that for submitting patches to the project, people try to use the steps at: https://wiki.freebsd.org/CodeReview to submit the patch to Phabricator. As a FreeBSD developer, I personally find that Phabricator is easier to work with patches thatn Bugzilla. Other FreeBSD developers may disagree with me, but more FreeBSD developers are starting to use Phabricator. -- Craig
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAG=rPVcj7Uh0WG=o2gHRPcfAc3bbH59WLCXXURWm4Y-x4HXn8w>