Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2015 19:06:27 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: CFT/CFR: NUMA policy branch Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmo=ON9bEngDoMFK-kJR=qVvcX%2BEeQXx%2BUoEsh1npMHjESQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmonyTfSxj%2BD=FN3TUCO33w4vGqh1REQqx-8rd-JcArfqSA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAJ-Vmo=SnqXTF5m65haKqrVf699zinyXs%2BQdvR6V88CW7vooCw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmonyTfSxj%2BD=FN3TUCO33w4vGqh1REQqx-8rd-JcArfqSA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, I've done another update. kib@ has been beating me with the clue stick a bit. https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/compare/master...erikarn:local/adrian_numa_policy * (kib) (numactl.c) fix up sorting of include files * (kib) (numactl.c) consistent use of values when calling err() * (kib) (numactl.c) consistently wrap lines at 78 characters, don't prematurely wrap lines * (kib) don't use the old-style BSD licence mentioning "regents", use the updated one * (kib) (vm_domain.c) don't break out after iterating a few times and have the API be unpredictable - so now the API will always succeed in reading a vm_policy I've tested the policies (first-touch, fixed-domain, round-robin) and they all still work as advertised, both on threads and processes. I'd appreciate more reviews and some further testing. Thanks! -adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmo=ON9bEngDoMFK-kJR=qVvcX%2BEeQXx%2BUoEsh1npMHjESQ>