Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:36:46 +0100
From:      Oscar Prieto <oscarmpp@gmail.com>
To:        Benjamin Lutz <benjamin.lutz@biolab.ch>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Swap on ZFS - bad idea? (swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer)
Message-ID:  <CAK9wqRrug7G5w3HyT7WiLitS8LJ-E1vYUNsD0X0EjkYfxcqgoQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <OFB3F5370B.79D00F5F-ONC1257C3D.0038AB15-C1257C3D.003AB574@biotronik.com>
References:  <OFB3F5370B.79D00F5F-ONC1257C3D.0038AB15-C1257C3D.003AB574@biotronik.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Personally I still have to read an announcement telling that swap on zfs is
relliable. I'm still using a dedicated swap partition on every install due
to that kind of behaviour.


On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Benjamin Lutz <benjamin.lutz@biolab.ch>wrote:

> We have storage server that I've found unresponsive this morning. The
> console was filled with these messages:
>
> swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer: bufobj: 0, blkno: 17344, size: 61440
>
> The lines were all exactly the same, no variation in the numbers.
> Ctrl-Alt-Delete had no effect.
>
> Now, the only thing related to swap that's special about this machine, is
> that we use swap on ZFS, because we figured, silent disk corruption is
> just as bad when it happens to swapped memory as it is when it happens to
> stored data. However, might this be the problem? One thought I was having
> was: ZFS hits its memory bounds, a process makes the kernel want to
> allocate a swap buffer which causes more ZFS operations which never
> complete because ZFS would need to do some housework to free memory, but
> the kernel is waiting for swap to become available, some sort of deadlock?
> I'm just speculating here, not knowing the internals of this subsystem.
>
> The machine is a quad core system with 12GiB RAM and a RAIDZ3 consisting
> of 12x2TB disks. It's used as a storage system, with accesses mainly
> through netatalk (an AFP server, what OS X uses) and a bit of iSCSI. I've
> set the following sysctls:
>
> #
>
> http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Evil_Tuning_Guide#Device_I.2FO_Queue_Size_.28I.2FO_Concurrency.29
> vfs.zfs.vdev.max_pending=20
> # limit kernel size to 10GB to leave some RAM for processes
> vm.kmem_size_max="10737418240"
> # increase number of mbuf clusters, see igb(4). The default is 25600
> kern.ipc.nmbclusters="102400"
>
> This sort of hang seems to happen every couple of months. I'd really like
> some pointers on how to increase the stability of this system. Maybe there
> are some more tunables I need to adjust? Or is swap on ZFS maybe just not
> a great idea?
>
> Cheers,
> Benjamin
> --
> Benjamin Lutz | Software Engineer | BIOLAB Technology AG
> Dufourstr. 80 | CH-8008 Zurich | www.biolab.ch | benjamin.lutz@biolab.ch
> PHONE +41 44 295 97 13 | MOBILE +41 79 558 57 13 | FAX +41 44 295 97 19
>
>
>
> This e-mail and the information it contains including attachments are
> confidential and meant
> only for use by the intended recipient(s); disclosure or copying is
> strictly prohibited. If you
> are not addressed, but in the possession of this e-mail, please notify the
> sender immediately.
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAK9wqRrug7G5w3HyT7WiLitS8LJ-E1vYUNsD0X0EjkYfxcqgoQ>