Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 20:24:05 +0400 From: Gleb Popov <arrowd@freebsd.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: git tools for building in base? Message-ID: <CALH631nJ_cnfLhG%2BSDX5Mchk2%2BRrfFn=38rXYrFwVxV%2BtG_QkQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfq0XOuJ--2jXVY42Nkxpu4YnuoCpoy4vVDo9o4hUp6ATw@mail.gmail.com> References: <X714z7pMgNOFaTIc@rpi4.local> <20201125055425.01AA628417@elsa.codelab.cz> <10f7b800-b015-2a80-b741-4f7db03bf6eb@quip.cz> <e3dce606-1a28-886f-b481-7f1d224d82cc@madpilot.net> <CANCZdfq0XOuJ--2jXVY42Nkxpu4YnuoCpoy4vVDo9o4hUp6ATw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 7:50 PM Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2020, 7:27 AM Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net> wrote: > > > On 18/12/20 14:02, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > > > On 25/11/2020 06:54, Thomas Mueller wrote: > > > > > >> NetBSD users face a similar problem with their upcoming switch from > > >> cvs to hg (Mercurial). > > > > > > Do anybody have a link to some documents stating why FreeBSD chose Git > > > and why NetBSD chose Mercurial? I am using both tools at $WORK, I am > > > just curious what leads to these decisions. > > > > > > > This is a draft document discussing exactly this (I'm not the author, > > imp was) > > > > https://github.com/bsdimp/freebsd-git-docs/blob/main/git-why.md > > > My blog > http://bsdimp.blogspot.com/2020/09/freebsd-subversion-to-git-migration.html > > And this video I did > https://youtu.be/uj1Ricrq0bs that starts with an old in joke... > > Warner > I can't find anything about Mercurial in all three links.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALH631nJ_cnfLhG%2BSDX5Mchk2%2BRrfFn=38rXYrFwVxV%2BtG_QkQ>