Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 17:46:02 -0400 From: Randall Stewart <rrs@lakerest.net> To: net@freebsd.org Subject: Observations from an old timer playing with 64 bit numbers... Message-ID: <E3C4102C-3106-4D5B-86E5-8D5BDD7FD442@lakerest.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi all: I have had some fun in my day job playing with exchanging 64bit numbers. Unfortunately there is no ntohll() OR htonll() which would be the logical thing (for us old farts) to use. Yes, I have found htobe64() and friends.. and that would work.. but I still cannot help but feeling we should have the ntohll() and htonll().. for consistency if nothing else. Any objections to this showing up in a head near you soon (speak soon or I will commit the patches to add these ;-D) R ------------------------------ Randall Stewart 803-317-4952 (cell)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E3C4102C-3106-4D5B-86E5-8D5BDD7FD442>