Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2000 11:18:23 -0500 (EST) From: Michael Bacarella <mbac@nyct.net> To: Mike Nowlin <mike@argos.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Re/Fwd: freebsd specific search Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10002021055590.10062-100000@bsd1.nyct.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.05.10002020213150.29061-100000@jason.argos.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> systems have the highest availability rate possible. Over the last few > years, I have replaced almost all of our Linux-based servers with FreeBSD, > due to the quality-control measures that the FreeBSD development team have > implemented. Not to start a flame-fest or anything (but who doesn't love em?), I hear the above quite a lot. I'm under the firm belief that a decent sys admin can rub either system to do whatever they want it to do. Not that I am questioning your abilities. I just get the "yeah, Linux is good, but just try to use it in a production environment and you'll understand" a lot. Granted, a lot of Linux distributions are totally unsuited for a server environment. Compared to that, I could understand why the server-orientedness of FreeBSD is attractive, but I certainly couldn't put up a reasonable arguement for either side in Slackware Linux vs. FreeBSD. Could you? -MB To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.10002021055590.10062-100000>