Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 28 Jan 2001 10:57:44 -0800 (PST)
From:      Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com>
To:        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
Cc:        John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com>
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/conf GENERIC 
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101281056240.21326-100000@beppo.feral.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101281038030.21326-100000@beppo.feral.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Nope.

lmdd of=file 

in this /tmp got me:

panic: lockmgr: pid 78175, not exclusive lock holder 5 unlocking
panic
Stopped at      Debugger+0x2c:  ldq     ra,0(sp) <0xfffffe000a2576a0>
<ra=0xfffffc0000524000,sp=0xfffffe000a2576a0>
db> t
Debugger() at Debugger+0x2c
panic() at panic+0x100
lockmgr() at lockmgr+0x534
brelse() at brelse+0xa20
bufdone() at bufdone+0x4a0
bufdonebio() at bufdonebio+0x1c
swap_pager_strategy() at swap_pager_strategy+0x114
vm_pager_strategy() at vm_pager_strategy+0x40
mdstart_swap() at mdstart_swap+0x11c
mdstrategy() at mdstrategy+0x128
diskstrategy() at diskstrategy+0x150
spec_strategy() at spec_strategy+0x224
spec_vnoperate() at spec_vnoperate+0x2c
ufs_strategy() at ufs_strategy+0x140
ufs_vnoperate() at ufs_vnoperate+0x2c
bwrite() at bwrite+0x390
vop_stdbwrite() at vop_stdbwrite+0x1c
vop_defaultop() at vop_defaultop+0x2c
ufs_vnoperate() at ufs_vnoperate+0x2c
bawrite() at bawrite+0x48
cluster_wbuild() at cluster_wbuild+0x6a8
cluster_write() at cluster_write+0x438
ffs_write() at ffs_write+0x500
vn_write() at vn_write+0x21c
dofilewrite() at dofilewrite+0x130
write() at write+0x5c
syscall() at syscall+0x2d4
XentSys1() at XentSys1+0x10
db> 

Maybe the 'mount -o async' is the culprit. Hmm. Never had this kind of trouble
with MFS.....


On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Matthew Jacob wrote:

> 
> > >> One should use md(4) and mdconfig(8) rather than MFS nowadays anyways, which
> > >> does work with DEVFS.
> > >
> > >Uh, I don't think so. MFS should be fixed. With MFS you should be able to take
> > >advantage of VM. I don't think the same applies to md.
> > 
> > Try it, and come back with numbers if you think it is worse...
> 
> Can't really compare right now, now can I, if MFS is broken ... :-)...
> 
> But seriously, I'll be using md a lot from now on and I'll let you know if it
> seems broken.... Like I said in other mail (paraphrasing) "Seems like this
> ought to be a VFS, but I don't really care"
> 
> 
> 
> 



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0101281056240.21326-100000>