Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 20:34:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Trent Nelson <nelsont@wa.switch.aust.com> Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org, dillon@earth.backplane.com Subject: Re: Paper detailing blocking heuristics based on Scheduler Activiations. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0108272034340.74870-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20010828110811.C1562@freebsd06.udt>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
ok so how do you get the actual paper? On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Trent Nelson wrote: > > http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/28629.html > > I'd like to hear peoples' opinion on this research paper. It > details a method of using Scheduler Activations to support a new > form of synchronisation primitives. > > How applicable is their work (which was a natural progression from > Anderson, et. al.) to our current situation? Could their suggested > blocking heuristics be incorporated into our kernel threads? > > Matt, I've CC'd you specifically because of your post to -current > that expressed your concern with the current state of locking > primitives in -CURRENT; which got me thinking to post this in the > first place. Julian, well, you get CC'd for obvious reasons. > > Regards, > > Trent. > > -- > Trent Nelson - Software Engineer - nelsont@switch.aust.com > "A man with unlimited enthusiasm can achieve > almost anything." --unknown > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0108272034340.74870-100000>