Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 18:04:59 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> To: "Alan L. Cox" <alc@imimic.com> Cc: alpha@FreeBSD.ORG, John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: on the same note.. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0211101804060.62965-100000@beppo> In-Reply-To: <3DCEB79A.69EB752D@imimic.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Matthew Jacob wrote: > > > > Err, well, this *is* in vm object allocation... > > Ah, I see what you're talking about now. Until the vm object has been > returned by the allocation routine it is not shared data. The > generation count is used to detect changes in the list of resident pages > by sleeping processes, not to detect that the same storage is being > recycled for a new object. > Well, if this is the case, the allocator shouldn't be just incrementing it, should it? Shouldn't it always start at zero? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0211101804060.62965-100000>