Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 1 Feb 2003 10:47:44 -0800 (PST)
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To:        FreeBSD current users <current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: split out patch
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0302011046440.55342-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0302010256220.51808-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
still no comments?

this patch seems to be working, but a review from another developer
would be good.. particularly re: the point mentionned..


On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Julian Elischer wrote:

> 
> I'm working on backing out david's patch.
> 
> Part of his megacommit was a patch that should ahve been separatly
> handled.
> 
> I have split it out..
> Can people have a look at it and see if it makes sense.
> 
> http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/lock.diff
> 
> basically locks need to be per thread but were per process.
> 
> Can we just use a thread* for this?
> I think so but I wonder why it wasn't a proc* before..
> 
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0302011046440.55342-100000>