Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 23:33:36 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> To: John Hay <jhay@meraka.org.za> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libpthread shared library version number Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0611022328050.16733@sea.ntplx.net> In-Reply-To: <20061103042116.GA50470@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za> References: <454936CA.6060308@FreeBSD.org> <20061102115058.GB10961@rambler-co.ru> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0611020824150.12236@sea.ntplx.net> <20061102140948.GA70915@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <20061102182419.GC774@rambler-co.ru> <454A60E9.7020303@FreeBSD.org> <20061102214157.GC2028@rambler-co.ru> <454A6B07.3090003@FreeBSD.org> <454A6E09.9080200@errno.com> <20061103042116.GA50470@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 3 Nov 2006, John Hay wrote: > I vote for bumping the version of a lib the first time it goes > incompatable ... actually just before that so that you don't get > incompatable libs with the same number. That was done already (libc version was bumped). But the part that wasn't done was bumping all the other libraries that are dependent on libc, and all libraries that need to be bumped for symbol versioning to be enabled by default. For tracking purposes, it's also nice to be able to see all the libraries being bumped at the same time, so you can see what is affected and how to do it again. -- DE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.64.0611022328050.16733>