Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 21:34:09 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Davour <ante@update.uu.se> To: Martin Hudec <corwin@aeternal.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portupgrade problem Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0404092128180.28354@Tempo.Update.UU.SE> In-Reply-To: <20040409192512.GB12347@pleiades.aeternal.net> References: <4076527F.1060902@users.sourceforge.net> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0404092042560.28354@Tempo.Update.UU.SE> <20040409192512.GB12347@pleiades.aeternal.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Martin Hudec wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > don't you really have atk in /usr/ports/accessibility/atk directory? No. > Perhaps look into ports-supfile.. do you have there ports-all enabled? No, I have it commented out, since I left all the individual ports collections in there instead, except for arabic, hebrew and some other exotic languages. Could it be I have made such a basic mistake as to not cvsup'ed a vital dependedcy?! I kind of figured the newly cvsup'ed port of cvsup would have included a new example file of ports-supfile if that had been the problem. One should never *expect* a computer to do something I guess. Would something strange happen now if I added a line for 'ports-accessability' in my ports-supfile and tried to cvsup again? I guess I *really* should do a pkgdb -Uu then? /Andreas
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.58.0404092128180.28354>