Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 4 Apr 2002 01:19:16 -0500 (EST)
From:      Ramkumar Chinchani <rc27@cse.Buffalo.EDU>
To:        Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
Cc:        Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, "Tim J. Robbins" <tim@robbins.dropbear.id.au>, <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: Ptracing each other
Message-ID:  <Pine.SOL.4.30.0204040118330.19398-100000@tarantula.cse.Buffalo.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <3CABC203.AAA5229A@mindspring.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

How does make such a distinction inside the kernel? Is it possible to
identify trace events in a trace and just ignore them?

-Ram

==> Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>/7:01pm/Apr 3, 2002 <==

[Ramkumar Chinchani wrote:
[> The requirement is that I have a theoretical framework where no process
[> trusts the other. So they watch (trace) each process.
[
[Sure.
[
[All you have to do is patch the OS to lie to you about not
[seeing trace events in a trace...
[
[-- Terry
[


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SOL.4.30.0204040118330.19398-100000>