Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 1 Mar 2012 21:05:06 +0400 (MSK)
From:      Maxim Konovalov <maxim.konovalov@gmail.com>
To:        Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>
Cc:        src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, Andre Oppermann <andre@FreeBSD.ORG>, svn-src-user@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r232345 - user/andre/tcp_workqueue/sys/netinet
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1203012104100.91233@mp2.macomnet.net>
In-Reply-To: <C4A480F9-0C13-4851-A2CB-6373CB49442B@fh-muenster.de>
References:  <201203011618.q21GIdww086427@svn.freebsd.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1203012057350.91233@mp2.macomnet.net> <C4A480F9-0C13-4851-A2CB-6373CB49442B@fh-muenster.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >> Author: andre
> >> Date: Thu Mar  1 16:18:39 2012
> >> New Revision: 232345
> >> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/232345
> >>
> >> Log:
> >>  Increase the initial CWND to 10 segments as defined in IETF TCPM
> >>  draft-ietf-tcpm-initcwnd-03 discussing why the higher initial window
> >>  improves the overall performance of many web services without risking
> >>  congestion collapse.
> >>
> >>  As long as it remains a draft it is not enabled by default and placed
> >>  under a sysctl marking it clearly as experimental:
> >>   net.inet.tcp.exprimental.initcwnd10
> >>
> >>  Linux as of kernel 3.0 has enabled it by default.
> >>
> > Wouldn't it be better to just let user to specify icwnd size?
> In SCTP we have a sysctl which gives the IW in MSS...
>
Yes, that's why I'm asking mainly.

-- 
Maxim Konovalov



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1203012104100.91233>