Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 15:10:17 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= <Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no> To: Manish Jain <bourne.identity@hotmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing Sublime Text3 on FreeBSD-10.1-i386 Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.11.1501191506110.1375@mail.fig.ol.no> In-Reply-To: <BLU436-SMTP241E8B0E36F939AF55134ACF64A0@phx.gbl> References: <mailman.60.1421409601.72162.freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> <BLU436-SMTP220A1C5AFBDA897CC34F219F64F0@phx.gbl> <alpine.BSF.2.11.1501161358150.1375@mail.fig.ol.no> <BLU436-SMTP241E8B0E36F939AF55134ACF64A0@phx.gbl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 18:58+0530, Manish Jain wrote:
>
> On 01/16/2015 18:31, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 18:03+0530, Manish Jain wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Has anyone managed to fully port Sublime Text/Sublime Text3 to
> > > FreeBSD-10.1-i386 ? Running st3 on my system gets me the famous
> > > "GLIBC_2.11 not found" message.
> >
> > These two ports are not native to FreeBSD, but precompiled Linux
> > executables, AFAICT.
> >
> > On my system, editors/sublime{,3} needs:
> >
> > emulators/linux_base-c6
> > accessibility/linux-c6-atk
> > graphics/linux-c6-cairo
> > textproc/linux-c6-expat
> > x11-fonts/linux-c6-fontconfig
> > graphics/linux-c6-gdk-pixbuf2
> > x11-toolkits/linux-c6-gtk2
> > graphics/linux-c6-jpeg
> > x11-toolkits/linux-c6-pango
> > graphics/linux-c6-png
> > graphics/linux-c6-tiff
> > x11/linux-c6-xorg-libs
> >
> > Maybe you should check the condition of the "Linuxulator" ports
> > installed on your system. The above list would be a good start.
>
> Hi,
>
> I tried installing as per your advice. base-c6 asked me to remove base-f10
> with 'pkg delete'. That done I installed all the ports in your list. Now
> running 'make install' in sublime3 gives me Error Code 1 :
>
> > linux-sublime-3.0.65 depends on file: /compat/linux/etc/fedora-release - not
> > found
> > ===> Verifying install for /compat/linux/etc/fedora-release in
> > /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f10
> >
> > ===> linux_base-f10-10_7 conflicts with installed package(s):
> > linux_base-c6-6.6
> > They will not build together.
>
> Thanks for any help.
Hum. For some reason it wants the old Fedora stuff on your system, not
the newer CentOS stuff as it wants on my system.
Is your ports tree up to date?
What's the contents of /etc/make.conf?
--
+-------------------------------+------------------------------------+
| Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, |
| Trond Endrestøl, | Trond Endrestøl, |
| IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, |
| Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gjøvik Technical College, Norway, |
| tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, |
| sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. |
+-------------------------------+------------------------------------+
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 14:15:20 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B202610
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 14:15:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-la0-x229.google.com (mail-la0-x229.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::229])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94E3E25D
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 14:15:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-la0-f41.google.com with SMTP id gm9so2956019lab.0
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 06:15:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=pDgVC+bzDzC/QmwW7E5pf1sfzFk0+rNytw6ddqVXPIw=;
b=eUbfjkV1ii3uYZIEm1YgYeMI4JZMuEKu8pd2lVzdw0zaVWQ/lTXKLKdMJm2xBiiU2z
WLeKpO6kPz/XacAagT779XP/jEtzXduXAfvYHHQ5gniqZ+wI50mb81g9kOD1dxM6aK3D
no90U+eLYhT7WmewbAn54Y0RquRwAtP7E3+o+tXqmU7N3JuqgrczD91RfdoVm/V0Je+z
zbEDM7p39ot5KsdZbdFa4C+QIbRsaD0eYusAyi54rdZTD6HHXHkTio7lpm9aRpcjmAw+
IVeAVvmhJbD5q+/rcEgFuO+j3JQa0DmOegEEEYvCyPrdhma2IB4tIgjgA0Azu1HCBAHD
/gig==
X-Received: by 10.112.72.197 with SMTP id f5mr30907968lbv.21.1421676917381;
Mon, 19 Jan 2015 06:15:17 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.20.229 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 06:14:37 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <54BD103D.4050300@infracaninophile.co.uk>
References: <CAAdA2WNpTpnQ_7KO10mEnoz7w9=TU+iSOcjo=Wi=asxk5aopww@mail.gmail.com>
<54BD0AF0.5040809@infracaninophile.co.uk>
<CAAdA2WOrzDrUPFZb8YgQNadWVzJoYjuwtOQmasTON88BiA97ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
<54BD103D.4050300@infracaninophile.co.uk>
From: Odhiambo Washington <odhiambo@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 17:14:37 +0300
Message-ID: <CAAdA2WPOMEiS3R+x+wOdkgCDaqVP1S5Cyi2eRfdXb4-P19ce0g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10 and manually compile applications without gcc
To: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1
Cc: User Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>;
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 14:15:20 -0000
Hahaaa...
That would be a long shot!
I give up.
On 19 January 2015 at 17:10, Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk
> wrote:
> On 2015/01/19 14:04, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> > So is there a shortcut way?:)
>
> Start with the Squid 3.4 port and attempt to upgrade it to Squid 3.5?
> If you succeed, submit a PR so the rest of the world can benefit from
> your work.
>
> I notice that the position of squid port maintainer is currently vacant,
> which probably explains why squid35 is not in ports at the moment.
> Squid is quite an important port to be left maintainer-less, so I'm sure
> you'ld be welcomed with open arms should you volunteer...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Matthew
>
>
>
>
--
Best regards,
Odhiambo WASHINGTON,
Nairobi,KE
+254733744121/+254722743223
"I can't hear you -- I'm using the scrambler."
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.11.1501191506110.1375>