Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 2 Dec 2008 00:43:08 -0600
From:      "Javier Vasquez" <jevv.cr@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [freebsd-questions] Looking @ upgrades mechanisms...
Message-ID:  <c88cc5730812012243j7a26d58bkec5cdb5fef799907@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <c88cc5730812012241i6ea540uc8a56f40c3d8237e@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <c88cc5730812012241i6ea540uc8a56f40c3d8237e@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/2/08, Javier Vasquez <jevv.cr@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was reading chapter 4 of the handbook, as well as chapters 24 and
> 26...  If I got it clear, I pretty much might get the base system
> updated by using freebsd-update script.  Ports collection can get
> updated with portsnap, but that doesn't update neither the intalled
> ports, nor the installed packages.  To upgrade the installed ports,
> portmanager or portmaster or portupgrade can be used...  However only
> portupgrade can be used to upgrade packages, right?
>
> Now, can something like "portupgrade -a -PP" to upgrade all packages
> without building a thing (might be that some don't get updated due to
> the lack of binary package yet, and in such case would dependencies be
> managed right)?
>
> More into how things work, as ports and pacakages are not part of the
> base systems, are they somehow associated to a particular release
> (most probably not)?  So that pretty much no matter the release, if
> packages and ports are kept up to date, they might be the same for all
> releases?
>
> I'm asking these questions since I'm evaluating moving to BSD, but I
> want to avoid compiling as much as possible since my box is 800MHz
> piii celeron with just 32KB of cache and 512MB of ram, and for it
> source based distributions have proven to be too much to handle, so my
> intention would be to live with binary packages and updates/upgrades
> only...
>
> Also if remaining under -STABLE, is all this possible?  Kind of
> understood that openoffice.org can't be installed with "pkg_add -r",
> so most probably if living under -STABLE automatic updates for
> openoffice.org won't show up...  So this kinds of answers one previous
> question about the packages been independent from the base system
> release, it looks like they aren't...
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Javier
>

I forgot to ask to CC me, since I'm not part of the list yet...

Thanks,

-- 
Javier



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c88cc5730812012243j7a26d58bkec5cdb5fef799907>