Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 10:58:30 +0200 From: Sander Vesik <sander.vesik@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not... Message-ID: <dcb2c27a05021200582c5750c1@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1935025570.20050211232605@wanadoo.fr> References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1050211122632.99069G-100000@fledge.watson.org> <1108126229.4084.43.camel@localhost.localdomain> <2fd864e05021106537bdcff09@mail.gmail.com> <1108146951.31338.10.camel@hatter.wonderland.dn> <1935025570.20050211232605@wanadoo.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:26:05 +0100, Anthony Atkielski <atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr> wrote: > Julio Capote writes: > > > A website like www.spreadfirefox.com aims at targetting firefox to > > regular users that may not get the full "marketing dosage" from > > www.mozilla.org, so why not do the same for freebsd? > > Because FreeBSD is a server, not a desktop. The real market potential > is on the server side. And if you want to convince large organizations > to adopt FreeBSD as a server, you must not present it as a substitute > for Windows desktops, a/k/a "regular users." This is BULLSHIT. Not just any any bullshit either but virulent stinky bullshit - and also coincidentially the best way to dispromote FreeBSD. > -- > Anthony >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?dcb2c27a05021200582c5750c1>