Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 14:41:11 -0400 From: <scratch65535@att.net> To: freebsd-ports <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: standard locations for port files Message-ID: <dolgqcpv4ihqsjbas28v0bglrboat4po5c@4ax.com> In-Reply-To: <729F1CC6-9A65-4CDF-B7E5-FB520779FD15@adamw.org> References: <59A82622.4030502@gmail.com> <729F1CC6-9A65-4CDF-B7E5-FB520779FD15@adamw.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Why wouldn't logs be in /usr/local/var/...? Given that all other port "stuff" is under /usr/local, what advantage is there in making logs an exception? [Default] On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 09:16:20 -0600, Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org> wrote: >> On 31 Aug, 2017, at 9:07, Ernie Luzar <luzar722@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Lets say I have a product that I want to port to Freebsd. >> >> Were is the standard location for the log file and PID file. >> >> Would it be in >> /usr/local/etc/product/product.log >> /usr/local/etc/product/product.pid >> >> or >> >> /var/log/product.log >> /var/run/product.pid > >It should be in /var. Many users keep /usr/local mounted read-only. > ># Adam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?dolgqcpv4ihqsjbas28v0bglrboat4po5c>