Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 22 Feb 2007 11:44:27 -0600
From:      "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net>
To:        "Luigi Rizzo" <rizzo@icir.org>
Cc:        multimedia@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: speex upgrade to 1.1.12 ?
Message-ID:  <op.tn5vkdeh9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
In-Reply-To: <20070221160312.A94968@xorpc.icir.org>
References:  <20070221073447.A89386@xorpc.icir.org> <op.tn31gkon9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <20070221095911.D90766@xorpc.icir.org> <op.tn34fuds9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <20070221112414.E91427@xorpc.icir.org> <op.tn372ibm9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <op.tn4hkoua9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <20070221160312.A94968@xorpc.icir.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:03:12 -0600, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 05:44:38PM -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
>
>> It looks like your wish comes true. ;-)
>>
>> Ubuntu:             1.1.12
>> Fedora Core 6:      1.2beta1
>> Mandriva One:       1.1.12
>> Gentoo:             1.1.12
>> Debian (stable):    1.1.6
>> Debian (unstable):  1.1.12
>>
>> I think I can go with 1.2beta1, but update in speex-devel first to se=
e  =

>> if
>> it works well. After that, I can do the speex-devel -> speex and wait=
  =

>> for
>> pointyhat to pour the error logs. Are you willing to help with this?
>
> already tried both - 1.2beta1 compiles rather cleanly,
>  if you want to have a look at the ports, they are at
>
> http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/FreeBSD/speex-20070221.tgz

Haven't taken a look at this one yet, but it will be same with speex-dev=
el  =

when I do the speex-devel -> speex.

> http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/FreeBSD/speex-devel-20070221.tgz

Why remove two patches? They are not need anymore? I can build with two =
 =

patches w/out any of problem. As for the Makefile, I have done a bit twe=
ak  =

 from your changes. Example:

-PORTVERSION -> DISTVERSION.
-CONFLICTS=3Dspeex-*, this is incorrect and is too general. It should be=
  =

speex-[0-9]*.
-Remove 'devel version' and peroid. An end of peroid in the sentence is =
 =

illegal in COMMENT.
-INSTALLS_SHLIB -> USE_LDCONFIG.
-CONFIGURE_TARGET -> USE_GNOME=3Dgnometarget
-Add USE_GNOME=3Dltverhack to avoid shared library version bump to often=
 by  =

fix libtool bug.
-Add CONFIGURE_ENV by add -I/-L${LOCALBASE}/[...] to make it works when =
 =

install speex in the different prefix.
-Remove MAKE_ENV, I don't think it is need.

I am not done (have to go back to class soon) with it yet, so if you hav=
e  =

any of question then let me know.

Cheers,
Mezz

> cheers
> luigi


-- =

mezz7@cox.net  -  mezz@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD GNOME Team  -  FreeBSD Multimedia Hat (ports, not src)
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/  -  gnome@FreeBSD.org
http://wiki.freebsd.org/multimedia  -  multimedia@FreeBSD.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.tn5vkdeh9aq2h7>