Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 08:23:40 -0500 From: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Replacing rc(8) (Was: FreeBSD Boot Times) Message-ID: <op.wf7d5qry34t2sn@tech304> In-Reply-To: <CAGwOe2YSkXfx7nbNdYefL1Tm0TSoZOr7oB5cGYY_xhH-QSBsyw@mail.gmail.com> References: <20120615124849.GI96212@ass.kameli.org> <CAKYr3zxSOFOUghqao=3U_8sBNHwqce8AGK6mSFd6is11qzjS8w@mail.gmail.com> <20120618081140.GK96212@ass.kameli.org> <4FDF6177.5050608@unsane.co.uk> <4FDF6586.9060501@gentoo.org> <4FDFB166.2040709@FreeBSD.org> <20120620085938.GL96212@ass.kameli.org> <CAGwOe2YSkXfx7nbNdYefL1Tm0TSoZOr7oB5cGYY_xhH-QSBsyw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 04:27:09 -0500, Fernando Apestegu=C3=ADa =20 <fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com> wrote: > Also, in embedded systems, boot time is an important factor. If you're designing a very specific embedded product based on FreeBSD = why =20 aren't you writing your own startup system? Why would anyone expect a =20 general purpose "out of the box" OS to excel in a highly optimized =20 embedded environment?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.wf7d5qry34t2sn>