Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 21:27:53 -0000 (UTC) From: Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> To: freebsd-git@freebsd.org Subject: got(1) in base (was: Re: gitup(1) in base) Message-ID: <slrns25vip.162.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de> References: <49046db6-88d9-d59d-85f5-ecc1321b07c6@siemens.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2021-02-08, "Osipov, Michael (LDA IT PLM)" <michael.osipov@siemens.com> wrote: > I'd like to raise the question whether gitup(1) [1] can be included in > base? Where are we with the inclusion of got(1) [1] in base? * It has reached a good maturity level * Stefan Sperling reacts quite fast to issues * It makes the base system complete and suitably replaces svnlite * It does not impose the huge complexity and dependency hierarchy of the original Git client on admins and other non-developers The original hold-up appears to have been an ex nihilo requirement that it must be Capsicum-ized. Somebody was working on this, but has gone silent. gitup is not Capsicum-ized either. [1] https://gameoftrees.org/ -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?slrns25vip.162.naddy>