Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 20:24:20 +0200 From: Brad Knowles <blk@skynet.be> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> Cc: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>, nms@otdel-1.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is there spinlocks/semaphores available for drivers? Message-ID: <v04220817b50557761ed5@[195.238.1.121]> In-Reply-To: <200003271753.JAA41782@apollo.backplane.com> References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000327072156.16642A-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> <200003271731.JAA41585@apollo.backplane.com> <200003271746.KAA26582@nomad.yogotech.com> <200003271753.JAA41782@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 9:53 AM -0800 2000/3/27, Matthew Dillon wrote: > So, frankly, it is perfectly acceptable. I can't think of a single > real-life setup that would sufffer. What about things like Adaptec 3940U2W controllers that have two SCSI interfaces, and by default I believe will want shared interrupts? Or controllers that have more then two interfaces? Or have I missed something fundamental here and this is not what you're talking about? -- These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy ====================================================================== Brad Knowles, <blk@skynet.be> || Belgacom Skynet SA/NV Systems Architect, Mail/News/FTP/Proxy Admin || Rue Colonel Bourg, 124 Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.13.11/12.49 || B-1140 Brussels http://www.skynet.be || Belgium To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?v04220817b50557761ed5>