From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Aug 11 2:51:57 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88D8437B400 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 02:51:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postoffice.aims.com.au (eth0.lnk.aims.com.au [203.31.73.253]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA28943E3B for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 02:51:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chris@aims.com.au) Received: from postoffice.aims.com.au (nts-ts1.aims.private [192.168.10.2]) by postoffice.aims.com.au with ESMTP id g7B9poe06855 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 19:51:50 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from chris@aims.com.au) Received: from ntsts1 by aims.com.au with SMTP (MDaemon.v3.5.3.R) for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 19:36:57 +1000 Reply-To: From: "Chris Knight" To: Subject: variable scope issue in -stable? Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 19:36:56 +1000 Message-ID: <014d01c2411a$a2bee5d0$020aa8c0@aims.private> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 Importance: Normal X-Return-Path: chris@aims.com.au X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Howdy, I've got the following problem in FreeBSD-stable, and also 4.6, 4.5 and 4.2. The following code is not behaving as expected: ----- #!/bin/sh match=0 anycmd | while read line do case "$line" in "command") match=1 echo "match=$match" ;; *) ;; esac done echo "match=$match" ----- The output of the above results in: match=1 match=0 I'd expect match to be a global definition, but match loses its value outside of the while block. It appears that read stuffs things up - if I change the while expression to something other than read, then the variable scope behaves correctly. Or am I missing something? Regards, Chris Knight Systems Administrator AIMS Independent Computer Professionals Tel: +61 3 6334 6664 Fax: +61 3 6331 7032 Mob: +61 419 528 795 Web: http://www.aims.com.au To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Aug 11 3: 0:28 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9183A37B400 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 03:00:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from iguana.icir.org (iguana.icir.org [192.150.187.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E36C43E65 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 03:00:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rizzo@iguana.icir.org) Received: (from rizzo@localhost) by iguana.icir.org (8.11.6/8.11.3) id g7BA0CS83668; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 03:00:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rizzo) Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 03:00:12 -0700 From: Luigi Rizzo To: Ian Dowse Cc: Mike Tancsa , stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fxp problems with latest stable Re: panics after upgrading to -STABLE Aug 9, 2002 (still something up) Message-ID: <20020811030012.C82972@iguana.icir.org> References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020810210400.0622d770@192.168.0.12> <200208110304.aa47521@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <200208110304.aa47521@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>; from iedowse@maths.tcd.ie on Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 03:04:26AM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, as i mentioned the problem seems to be related to the m_free() changes. In any case, coming to your points: * I cannot guarantee that the NIC will not set the 0x4000 bit in the descriptor, and the specs are not available so i cannot tell. It sure seems unused in both the Linux driver (from Intel) and the FreeBSD driver, and i always saw it as on my hardware. But i agree that in absence of documentation we should use a different method to mark a pending RNR. The patch below writes "0" into the "size" field of a completed rfd to mark a pending RNR. It should be a lot safer even against future revisions of the chip. Again I cannot guarantee that the fxp chip does not update that field after completing reception, but that would be a totally unreasonable behaviour! There would be yet another workaround, namely to use an additional field in the device descriptor to record pending RNR's, but that would be a little bit trickier. * the size field is 14 bits, and the linux driver (from Intel) has /*- RFD misc bits*/ #define RFD_EOF_BIT BIT_15 /* RFD End-Of-Frame Bit */ #define RFD_F_BIT BIT_14 /* RFD Buffer Fetch Bit */ #define RFD_ACT_COUNT_MASK BIT_0_13 /* RFD Actual Count Mask */ also masks it with 0x3fff (although it also does a min() with some odd value, see below: data_sz = min_t(u16, (le16_to_cpu(rfd->rfd_act_cnt) & 0x3fff), (sizeof (rfd_t) - bdp->rfd_size)); so if bit 12 were bogus, it would produce bogus results also after the min_t() above. cheers luigi On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 03:04:26AM +0100, Ian Dowse wrote: > > Hi Mike, > > thanks for tracking down the commit that caused this. I had a quick > look at the changes in that revision, and although there were no > obvious problems I could see, a few things stood out as possible > candidates: > > The FXP_RFA_RNRMARK flag: Luigi, do you have hardware documentation > for the Intel etherexpress chips that explicitly says that this bit > is free for use by the device driver? If not, this would be my first > guess at the problem. A patch that just #if 0's out this code > (breaking the DEVICE_POLLING case) is below. It would be very useful > to know if this makes a difference. > > Total packet size: the old code used rfa->actual_size & (MCLBYTES - 1) > and the new version uses a mask of 0x3fff. I assume this is correct, > but to test if it is the problem, change the 0x3fff to 0x1fff. Index: if_fxp.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/dev/fxp/if_fxp.c,v retrieving revision 1.110.2.24 diff -u -r1.110.2.24 if_fxp.c --- if_fxp.c 9 Aug 2002 02:04:20 -0000 1.110.2.24 +++ if_fxp.c 11 Aug 2002 09:25:43 -0000 @@ -1307,7 +1307,7 @@ if ( (rfa->rfa_status & FXP_RFA_STATUS_C) == 0) break; - if (rfa->rfa_status & FXP_RFA_RNRMARK) + if (rfa->size == 0) /* XXX we had a pending RNR */ rnr = 1; /* * Remove first packet from the chain. @@ -1342,9 +1342,11 @@ } } if (rnr) { - if (rfa->rfa_status & FXP_RFA_STATUS_C) - rfa->rfa_status |= FXP_RFA_RNRMARK; - else { + if (rfa->rfa_status & FXP_RFA_STATUS_C) { + if (rfa->size == 0) + printf("+++ ouch, fxp zeroed size!\n"); + rfa->size = 0; /* XXX record a pending RNR */; + } else { fxp_scb_wait(sc); CSR_WRITE_4(sc, FXP_CSR_SCB_GENERAL, vtophys(sc->rfa_headm->m_ext.ext_buf) + To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Aug 11 3:20:55 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 466D037B400 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 03:20:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from maila.telia.com (maila.telia.com [194.22.194.231]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AE8D43E65 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 03:20:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from d1o913.telia.com (d1o913.telia.com [195.252.44.241]) by maila.telia.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7BAKMWE008784 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 12:20:22 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-Recipient: Received: from falcon.midgard.homeip.net (h62n2fls20o913.telia.com [212.181.163.62]) by d1o913.telia.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id MAA04318 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 12:20:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 41022 invoked by uid 1001); 11 Aug 2002 10:20:12 -0000 Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 12:20:12 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson To: Chris Knight Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: variable scope issue in -stable? Message-ID: <20020811102010.GA40612@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: Chris Knight , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <014d01c2411a$a2bee5d0$020aa8c0@aims.private> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <014d01c2411a$a2bee5d0$020aa8c0@aims.private> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 07:36:56PM +1000, Chris Knight wrote: > Howdy, > > I've got the following problem in FreeBSD-stable, and also 4.6, 4.5 and 4.2. > The following code is not behaving as expected: > ----- > #!/bin/sh > match=0 > anycmd | while read line > do > case "$line" in > "command") > match=1 > echo "match=$match" > ;; > *) > ;; > esac > done > echo "match=$match" > ----- > The output of the above results in: > match=1 > match=0 > > I'd expect match to be a global definition, but match loses its value > outside of the while block. > It appears that read stuffs things up - if I change the while expression to > something other than read, then the variable scope behaves correctly. > Or am I missing something? The following paragraph from the sh(1) manpage seems relevant: Note that unlike some other shells, sh executes each process in the pipeline as a child of the sh process. Shell builtin commands are the exception to this rule. They are executed in the current shell, although they do not affect its environment when used in pipelines. So it is not the read, but the pipe that makes things behave differently from what you expect. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Aug 11 3:37:27 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40ACA37B400 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 03:37:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from prometheus.vh.laserfence.net (prometheus.laserfence.net [196.44.73.116]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC6DE43E3B for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 03:37:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from will@highveldcs.com) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (helo=phoenix.vh.laserfence.net) by prometheus.vh.laserfence.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 17dq5f-000Ge8-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 12:36:55 +0200 Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 12:36:44 +0200 (SAST) From: Willie Viljoen X-X-Sender: will@phoenix.vh.laserfence.net To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Dummynet and Fastrack/Kazaa (FALSE ALARM) Message-ID: <20020811114945.W6225-100000@phoenix.vh.laserfence.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Sorry about the double post for some people, I sorted out this problem yesterday, and in the follow up post, I accidentally replied only to the people who replied to me. The problem wasn't the P2P clients not taking well to having their bandwidth limited, but the fact that the site having the problem were also running natd. Their firewall was in one pass mode (net.inet.ip.fw.one_pass=1), which caused packets that go through dummynet, not to go through natd, and thus not making it back to the private IPs of the hosts from which the P2P connections were coming. For the "record of future generations", here's how to make dummynet and natd work together without trodding on each other's toes, and also how to set up a reasonably secure stateful firewall for such a site. The customer having a problem is a clusterhome development. They run two 128kbps ISDN connections, to provide a combined 256kbps link. It's managed by a strange proprietary piece of software provided to them by their previous ISP, and adopted by us (because we didn't want to mess about with reconfiguring everything) It basically established a multilink ISDN connection, and then creates a file which can be read from and written to asif it were a serial device. This runs on both sides, and then a pppd on both sides is connected to the "device" to provide kernel PPP support. To alleviate the problem, I decided to limit bandwidth for FTP and P2P connections (mostly the Kazaa-like P2Ps, which are causing the problem) to 200kbps, allowing a small extra gap for e-mail and other traffic, and not to limit HTTP, because the client refused to have that. They use the private network 192.168.0.0/24, with two ethernet interfaces, ed0 and ed1, ed0 being the only one having an IP address, and the interfaces acting as a bridge for the rather large ethernet, which is devided rather strangely into two sections, one for the east side of the complex, and the other for the west. The two sections also have a number of badly set up switches and hubs connecting their hosts, but I won't get into that right now. Below are firewall rules to set up a secure stateful firewall, alloing only outgoing connections from the complex. Their e-mail is handled by a server on our premisis, so there's no need to allow connections in to their network. These rules also implement dummynet and natd as I mentioned above. -- /etc/ipfw.conf: -f flush pipe 00100 config bw 200Kbit/s queue 40KB add 00100 divert natd ip from any to any via ppp0 add 00200 pipe 00100 tcp from any 20,21,1214 to any recv ppp0 add 00300 check-state add 00400 allow ip from any to any out keep-state add 00500 allow ip from any to any via lo0 keep-state add 00600 allow ip from 192.168.0.0/24 to any via ed* keep-state -- The above rules are the minimum for getting this running. Note that the natd rule is placed before the dummynet rule. This order is not significant, but for reasons unknown (or not understood properly by me), this configuration work better when the rules are in the order mentioned above. A briefe explanation: Rules 00100 and 00200 (obviously) direct the packets to natd to allow address translation, and then to dummynet (where applicable) to perform bandwidth limiting. Rule 00300 is part of the fairly new set of advanced stateful rules available in ipfw. It checks if a packet has previously been associated with the dynamic ruleset table, and if so, allows the packet to be forwarded on to it's destination. Rule 00400 may be considered by some people to be insecure, but it serves a perpose here. It matches packets generated by the local host that are outbound, and adds dynamic rules to the state table to remember these outgoing connections. Rule 00500 is abit out of place, but it basically allows traffic on the local interface to pass through the firewall at the "check-state" point on the next match, mostly not needed. Rule 00600 matches outbound traffic from the private networks. It adds dynamic rules for these connections to the state table to allow packets back in at the "check-state" point, right after they pass through natd and dummynet pipes. Note that interfaces are specified. This is to protect from people outside the firewall somehow setting their addresses to these private ranges, and attempting to route through our system in order to "spoof" their IP address as ours. In my previous post (which only some people got) I actually had an unoptimized rule set which had two separate rules for ed0 and ed1, but this can be shortened to ed* to allow packets on this range from both these interfaces. Usually, only ed0 should be needed, but even though the bridged ethernet frames are not being passed through ipfw directly, the kernel still records packets that came in over ed1 as having been received over ed1, even though they were intended for the IP address on ed0. Had the system been using different kinds of interfaces, a rule would be required for each, for instance, ed0 and ep0. This is all that's needed for the basic functionality, however, using just the above (minimal) rules, will break some things, below are the rest of the rules recommended for a more complete implementation: -- /etc/ipfw.conf add 00700 allow icmp from any to any icmptypes 0,3,4,8,11,12,13,14 add 00800 deny ip from any to any frag in recv ppp0 add 00900 deny tcp from any to any established in recv ppp0 add 01000 reset tcp from any to any 113 in setup add 01100 unreach port udp from any to any 33400-33556 in recv ppp0 -- Another briefe explanation: Rule 00700 allows certain ICMP packets which are important to some software and configurations. Most people may disable source quench (4), which is typically not allowed, and if you want to disable ping packets enterering your network, you may also remove type 8. Note that this will not affect pings leaving your network from the private IP ranges, as they are allowed through by rule 00600, and allowed back in by rule 00700 if ICMP type 0 is allowed. ICMP type 11 allows traceroute to function from within your network to outside hosts. The other ICMP types are important for MTU discovery and control messages, and should not be blocked. Also, you may choose to allow ICMP type 5 (redirects), but this can be dangerous, and should be used with care. Rule 00800 stops fragmented IP packets from entering your network from the outside internet. Because the relevant ICMP packets are passing through your firewall, MTU discovery should work properly, and fragments should not exist at this point. Rule 00900 stops packets "claiming" to be from an established TCP connection from entering your network. Packets from legitimate connections will have been allowed through at the "check-state" point, so these packets will typically be stray ACKs from lost connections, or nmap et al "ACK scans" (designed to reveal simple state based firewalls) Rule 01000 sends a TCP RESET in response to connection attempts to port 113. This deflects "ident" or "auth" requests, mostly sent by FTP and IRC servers, but which is unneeded and in many cases not secure. Deflecting this is handy because some (broken) servers will wait forever for an response from a firewalled port, or disconnect your users for having a "time-out" on the auth request (which will not otherwise make it through the firewall). When a reset is sent, the remote machines will assume your host is not running identd (the default these days) and allow your users to continue without this. Note that some IRC servers on older IRC networks will not allow users to connect without identd running, you will have to address this problem differently if it should arise. Rule 01100 is a courtesy to people attempting to use traceroute to your network's public IP. Normally, because ipfw defaults to blocking all packets not explicitly allowed through, a traceroute to your host would "star out", and continue up to the maximum hop count specified by the originator. With this rule in place, ICMP port unreachable packets are returned in response to UDP traceroute packets. This will cause traceroute not to "star out", but stop the trace at your firewall's public IP address, thinking it reached the destination host. This is also handy for networks routing to public IPs behind their firewall, as it will not cause traceroute to "star out", but also not allow the trace to continue beyond your firewall. Keep in mind, that for this configuration to be secure, ipfirewall(4) will have to deny all packets by default (the default). If your kernel has been compiled to accept by default, you will either need to recompile it to deny by default, or add a rule like this, to act as a "pseudo-default" rule: -- /etc/ipfw.conf: add 65534 deny ip from any to any -- That's it for the firewall configuration, however, you will need still more configuraton for this implementation to work entirely as expected. Most notibly, your firewall must not be in one pass mode (which is the default). To disable this at run time, use: sysctl net.inet.ip.fw.one_pass=0 Here (for reference) are the complete options in rc.conf(5) and sysctl.conf(5) to get a working implementation as explained above: -- /etc/rc.conf: firewall_enable="YES" firewall_type="/etc/ipfw.conf" gateway_enable="YES" ifconfig_ed0="inet 192.168.0.254 netmask 255.255.255.0" # Assuming your public IP address is 196.25.25.25 (fictional): natd_enable="YES" natd_interface="196.25.25.25" natd_flags="-s -u -punch_fw 10000:10000" -- -- /etc/sysctl.conf: #Only for bridging net.link.ether.bridge=1 net.link.ether.bridge_cfg="ed0,ed1" #Disable one pass mode net.inet.ip.fw.one_pass=0 -- Also, for all of the above to work, your kernel will have to have been configured with all the relevant options, the use of and meaning of which I won't explain here, as it is covered in various places, basically, you will need the following: options IPFIREWALL options IPDIVERT options DUMMYNET options BRIDGE #Only for bridging That's pretty much it. Sorry for the long post, but I'm hoping this will make it into the archives soon, sothat other people who have this problem in future can find it quickly, that also being the reason for it being a little bit too complete, apology to anybody who just read pages and pages of things they aready know :) Will -- Willie Viljoen Highveld Computing Solutions 214 Paul Kruger Avenue Universitas Bloemfontein 9321 South Africa +27 51 522 15 60, a/h +27 51 522 44 36 +27 82 404 03 27 will@highveldcs.com To find out how we can help you with inventive solutions, visit http://www.highveldcs.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Aug 11 4:40:20 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A07137B400 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 04:40:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFBAC43E75 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 04:40:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.gtn.com) Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by srv1.cosmo-project.de (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7BBeD0Z048488 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 13:40:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.gtn.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by srv1.cosmo-project.de (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) with UUCP id g7BBeDdw048487 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 13:40:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.gtn.com) Received: from titan.klemm.apsfilter.org (localhost.klemm.apsfilter.org [127.0.0.1]) by klemm.gtn.com (8.12.5/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g7BBcDHl033964 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 13:38:29 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org) Received: (from andreas@localhost) by titan.klemm.apsfilter.org (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g7BBcCGu033801 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 13:38:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 13:38:12 +0200 From: Andreas Klemm To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: make release fails with: boot_crunch.c:94: too few arguments to function `main' Message-ID: <20020811113812.GA1513@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG A few days ago I discovered this and its still there after a few days, only wanted to drop you a note. cc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/release/sysinstall/../../gnu/lib/libdialog -I. -DX_AS_PKG -c variable.c cc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/release/sysinstall/../../gnu/lib/libdialog -I. -DX_AS_PKG -c wizard.c cc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/release/sysinstall/../../gnu/lib/libdialog -I. -DX_AS_PKG -c pccard.c cc -O -pipe -c boot_crunch.c boot_crunch.c: In function `crunched_main': boot_crunch.c:94: too few arguments to function `main' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/release/boot_crunch. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/release. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/release. -- Andreas Klemm /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ http://www.64bits.de < Powered by FreeBSD > http://www.apsfilter.org/ \ www.FreeBSD.org / http://people.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Aug 11 6: 7:59 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D160437B400; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 06:07:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cage.simianscience.com (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2DAF43E6A; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 06:07:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from house.sentex.net (fcage [192.168.0.2]) by cage.simianscience.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7BD7p6A063159; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 09:07:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020811090030.06a7d640@192.168.0.12> X-Sender: mdtancsa@192.168.0.12 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 09:08:00 -0400 To: stable@freebsd.org, Luigi Rizzo From: Mike Tancsa Subject: re: fxp problems with latest stable Re: panics after upgrading to -STABLE Aug 9, 2002 (still something up) Cc: Ian Dowse In-Reply-To: <20020811024117.B82972@iguana.icir.org> References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020810234921.014d7ec0@192.168.0.12> <200208110434.aa60377@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> <5.1.0.14.0.20020810234921.014d7ec0@192.168.0.12> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: amavis-20020220 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thanks once again Luigi and Ian! sysctl -w kern.ipc.mcl_pool_max=0 does fix it for now. ---Mike At 02:41 AM 8/11/2002 -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote: >Hi, >I am looking at the problem -- I am able to replicate it so i expect >to have a fix committed tonight. For the time being, >setting mcl_pool_max=0 in kern/uipc_mbuf.c should cure the problem. > >if_fxp.c seems to be innocent. The problem appears to be related >to the change to m_getcl()/m_freem(), probably i am not (re)initializing >some mbuf fields when i put the freed buffers in the free pool, >resulting in some cases in invalid buffers, which are dropped and >recycled. Eventually these buffers get out of the way because with >two identical boxes A and B, freshly rebooted, i see the following >sequence of events: > > A# ping -f B --> losses > B# ping -f A --> no losses > A# ping -f B --> no losses now! > >and reversing A and B produces (after both reboot) the same effect in >reverse order. Also, setting kern.ipc.mcl_pool_max=0 on the destination >host seems to remove the losses. > >Back to debugging... > > cheers > luigi > >On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 11:53:13PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > At 04:34 AM 8/11/2002 +0100, Ian Dowse wrote: > > >In message <5.1.0.14.0.20020810225848.068a4690@192.168.0.12>, Mike Tancsa > > >write > > >s: > > > >Also, the pings less lossy with your patch. Note, these are non busy > > > >machines (PIII 1000 and PIV1.6). The patch does seem to make the > problem > > > >less acute. But, it is still there. > > > > > >Thanks for the info. Yet another thing to try: > > > > > > sysctl kern.ipc.mcl_pool_max=0 > > > > > >Ian > > > > > > That does the trick. Everything on my 2 test boxes are exactly what is in > > the cvsup repository > > > > newhespborder# sysctl -w kern.ipc.mcl_pool_max=0 > > kern.ipc.mcl_pool_max: 10 -> 0 > > newhespborder# > > > > ping -q -c 400 -i .01 192.168.43.218 > > PING 192.168.43.218 (192.168.43.218): 56 data bytes > > > > --- 192.168.43.218 ping statistics --- > > 400 packets transmitted, 400 packets received, 0% packet loss > > round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.119/0.126/0.235/0.013 ms > > > > > > And same with the other box. > > > > ping -q -c 400 -i .01 192.168.43.91 > > PING 192.168.43.91 (192.168.43.91): 56 data bytes > > > > --- 192.168.43.91 ping statistics --- > > 400 packets transmitted, 400 packets received, 0% packet loss > > round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.112/0.121/0.223/0.010 ms > > > > The one strange thing I do notice is that initially there is a bit of loss > > and then its OK. > > > > ---Mike > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 > > Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net > > Providing Internet since 1994 www.sentex.net > > Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Aug 11 7:40:17 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B481A37B40B for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 07:40:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (castle.jp.FreeBSD.org [210.226.20.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2D4F43E5E for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 07:40:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [::1]) by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.3) with ESMTP/inet6 id g7BEe3377885; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 23:40:03 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org) Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <20020811113812.GA1513@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> References: <20020811113812.GA1513@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> X-User-Agent: Mew/1.94.2 XEmacs/21.5 (bamboo) X-FaceAnim: (-O_O-)(O_O- )(_O- )(O- )(- -)( -O)( -O_)( -O_O)(-O_O-) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 12 From: Makoto Matsushita To: andreas@klemm.gtn.com Subject: Re: make release fails with: boot_crunch.c:94: too few arguments to function `main' Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 23:39:59 +0900 Message-Id: <20020811233959K.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG andreas> A few days ago I discovered this and its still there after andreas> a few days, only wanted to drop you a note. Workaround: rebuild ${CHROOT}/usr/bin/crunchgen, and try again. Possible real-fix: define bootstrap-tools-for-make-release, build them in the early stage of"make doRELEASE," and use them instead of the ones which are installed under ${CHROOT]/bin or others. -- - Makoto `MAR' Matsushita To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Aug 11 8: 7:40 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 851AA37B400 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 08:07:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp12.singnet.com.sg (smtp12.singnet.com.sg [165.21.6.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7187843E72 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 08:07:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bennyc@magix.com.sg) Received: from zehn.mine.nu (ad202.166.1.178.magix.com.sg [202.166.1.178]) by smtp12.singnet.com.sg (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g7BF7Zhq002431 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 23:07:35 +0800 Received: (from bennyc@localhost) by zehn.mine.nu (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g7BF7ij2061473 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 23:07:44 +0800 (SGT) Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 23:07:42 +0800 From: Benny Chee To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: portupgrade: resource temporarily unavailable Message-ID: <20020811150742.GA61410@magix.com.sg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: Singapore Telecommunications Ltd Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG hi, i saw the post in -stable b4, i would like to know if there's any solution to the problem when doing a portupgrade. ===> Registering installation for gettext-0.11.5 Cannot fork: Resource temporarily unavailable Cannot fork: Resource temporarily unavailable Cannot fork: Resource temporarily unavailable Cannot fork: Resource temporarily unavailable Cannot fork: Resource temporarily unavailable Cannot fork: Resource temporarily unavailable A "ps -auxwww" shows that i m getting abt 500++ of "make CHILD_DEPENDS=yes PARENT_CHECKED= package-depends-list". How do i go abt solving this? benny To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Aug 11 8:53:28 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 287E137B400 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 08:53:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tp.databus.com (p70-227.acedsl.com [66.114.70.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D83E43E4A for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 08:53:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from barney@databus.com) Received: from databus.com (localhost.databus.com [127.0.0.1]) by tp.databus.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7BFlZCi050381; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 11:47:35 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from barney@databus.com) Received: (from barney@localhost) by databus.com (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g7BFlZ9M050380; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 11:47:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 11:47:35 -0400 From: Barney Wolff To: Benny Chee Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: portupgrade: resource temporarily unavailable Message-ID: <20020811154735.GA50320@tp.databus.com> References: <20020811150742.GA61410@magix.com.sg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020811150742.GA61410@magix.com.sg> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Rumor has it that this is caused by circular dependencies. Try building with make rather than portupgrade. On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 11:07:42PM +0800, Benny Chee wrote: > hi, > > i saw the post in -stable b4, i would like to know if there's any solution to the problem when doing a portupgrade. > > ===> Registering installation for gettext-0.11.5 > Cannot fork: Resource temporarily unavailable > Cannot fork: Resource temporarily unavailable > Cannot fork: Resource temporarily unavailable > Cannot fork: Resource temporarily unavailable > Cannot fork: Resource temporarily unavailable > Cannot fork: Resource temporarily unavailable > > A "ps -auxwww" shows that i m getting abt 500++ of "make CHILD_DEPENDS=yes PARENT_CHECKED= package-depends-list". > How do i go abt solving this? -- Barney Wolff I'm available by contract or FT: http://www.databus.com/bwresume.pdf To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Aug 11 10: 5:30 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D16AF37B400; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 10:05:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from klima.physik.uni-mainz.de (klima.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.180.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30AF943E4A; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 10:05:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from administrator@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de) Received: from klima.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE (administrator@klima.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.180.162]) by klima.physik.uni-mainz.de (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7BH5NIT020629; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 19:05:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from administrator@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de) Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 19:05:23 +0200 (CEST) From: Administrator IPA To: Mike Tancsa Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Subject: Re: fxp problems with latest stable Re: panics after upgrading to -STABLE Aug 9, 2002 (still something up) In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20020810210400.0622d770@192.168.0.12> Message-ID: <20020811190325.L20562-100000@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 10 Aug 2002, Mike Tancsa wrote: Dear Mike. I reported a similar problem on August the 9th and I must say, sorry, if I would have offered the dmesg output all should have seen that we use only Intel NICs around here! Another workstation with a 3Com NIC does not show this strange behaviour. > > I did some more tests with the new driver with 2 machines on a totally > different segment and the same sorts of packet loss on simple pings. If I > revert to the previous version, no packet loss at all. > > $FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/fxp/if_fxp.c,v 1.110.2.24 2002/08/09 02:04:20 luigi Exp $ > vs > $FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/fxp/if_fxp.c,v 1.110.2.23 2002/07/29 02:50:59 luigi Exp $ > > I confirmed this on 2 separate machines. > > > The fxp nics in question are > > fxp0: port 0xa800-0xa81f mem > 0xf9000000-0xf90fffff,0xfd000000-0xfd000fff irq 11 at device 13.0 on pci0 > fxp0: Ethernet address 00:a0:c9:89:d5:ba > inphy0: on miibus0 > inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto > > and > > fxp0: port 0xa000-0xa03f mem > 0xe9500000-0xe95fffff,0xe9600000-0xe9600fff irq 10 at device 4.0 on pci2 > fxp0: Ethernet address 00:d0:b7:db:69:6a > inphy0: on miibus0 > inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto > > Both nics on both machines in question do have shard IRQs, but like I said, > with the previous version of the driver it works fine. If I can provide any > more information, please let me know. I do have a serial console on one > machine and will have physical access to it once again on Monday. > > ---Mike > > > At 08:53 PM 8/10/2002 -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > >Actually, I am still seeing a lot of strange things. The patch certainly > >fixed the panics, but now I am seeing packet loss on links off the same subnet. > > > >e.g. > >32 packets transmitted, 23 packets received, 28% packet loss > >round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.333/0.348/0.389/0.015 ms > > > >If I reboot with an old kernel its fine. > > > >Even stranger..... If I do a dump from a machine a few hops away, I get my > >normal throughput. > > > >netstat -ni does not show any problems, nor do the switch counters show > >any issues. These are with fxp cards. Could it be the latest fxp commit ? > > > > ---Mike > > > > > > > >At 07:45 AM 8/10/2002 -0700, Randy Bush wrote: > >> > Could someone put the word out when this issue is fixed? This problem > >> > just hosed my web server after I forgot the prime directive: test on a > >> > non-critical machine. > >> > >>it was fixed > >> > >>randy > >> > >> > >>To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > >>with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > >-------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 > >Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net > >Providing Internet since 1994 www.sentex.net > >Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike > > > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 > Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net > Providing Internet since 1994 www.sentex.net > Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > -- MfG O. Hartmann ohartman@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de ---------------------------------------------------------------- IT-Administration des Institut fuer Physik der Atmosphaere (IPA) ---------------------------------------------------------------- Johannes Gutenberg Universitaet Mainz Becherweg 21 55099 Mainz Tel: +496131/3924662 (Maschinensaal) Tel: +496131/3924144 FAX: +496131/3923532 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Aug 11 10:12: 0 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AC7337B400 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 10:11:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gruntle.org (dis.gruntle.org [198.144.205.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E9ACC43E81 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 10:11:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rover@gruntle.org) Received: (qmail 94157 invoked by uid 1001); 11 Aug 2002 17:11:55 -0000 Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 10:11:55 -0700 From: cj_ To: Mike Tancsa Cc: David Wolfskill , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: fxp problems with latest stable Re: panics after upgrading to -STABLE Aug 9, 2002 (still something up) Message-ID: <20020811171155.GD92924@gruntle.org> References: <20020811014225.GC92924@gruntle.org> <5.1.0.14.0.20020810223857.06868830@192.168.0.12> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20020810223857.06868830@192.168.0.12> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have a machine that has two different interfaces (xl for the external and fxp for the LAN). After rebuilding the kernel after 8/9/02, I experienced kernel panic -- but only as as result of passing data through the fxp interface. It stayed stable until I ssh'ed into the router, which caused almost immediate panic. No connections (that were automatically opened by startup scripts) to the outside world via xl caused this problem. This is consistent with the idea that the fxp driver is borked somehow. The revision date in the CVS tag seems to support this. * $FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/fxp/if_fxp.c,v 1.110.2.24 2002/08/09 02:04:20 luigi Exp $ Just my observerations, it may be incorrect. I haven't tested the patch referenced, I'm wary of more downtime. -- Chris Original message from Mike Tancsa: > > Yes, I do not get those reproducible panics either. However, I think this > fxp problem I am seeing now is something different. > > ---Mike > > At 07:36 PM 8/10/2002 -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > >>Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 18:42:25 -0700 > >>From: cj_ > > > >>Can someone confirm when the -STABLE kernel is usable? I lack a > >>throwaway machine to test this out on. > > > >I was able to get a dead-on reproducible panic, even with sources > >CVSupped as of 0347 hrs. PST (GMT-7) today. After hand-applying the > >patch in > >http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=2013026+0+current/cvs-all > >(which refers to PR kern/41492), I no longer get that (or any other, so > >far) panic. > > > >Cheers, > >david (links to my resume at http://www.catwhisker.org/~david) > >-- > >David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org > >To paraphrase David Hilbert, there can be no conflicts between Microsoft > >and the discipline of systems administration, since they have nothing in > >common. > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 > Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net > Providing Internet since 1994 www.sentex.net > Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Aug 11 11:16:43 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B97C137B400 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 11:16:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from priv-edtnes27.telusplanet.net (defout.telus.net [199.185.220.240]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC96C43E42 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 11:16:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lewwid@telusplanet.net) Received: from Jeff ([161.184.39.165]) by priv-edtnes27.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.5.01.04.05 201-253-122-122-105-20011231) with SMTP id <20020811181638.YYHJ589.priv-edtnes27.telusplanet.net@Jeff> for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 12:16:38 -0600 From: lewwid To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 12:15:11 -0600 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Reply-To: lewwid@telusplanet.net Message-Id: Subject: BASH using up major CPU while idle. Could it be caused by portupgrade? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" X-Mailer: Opera 6.03 build 1107 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Frequently I have had to kill -INT 1 to reboot because nothing on the box would respond. I used portupgrade bash and ever since I've been getting fork: Resource temporarily unavailable for every command. Maybe I'll put root's shell to tcsh and then uninstall bash, and install it by going cd /usr/ports/shells/bash2 && make install clean Hopefully that will stop these errors. Thanks guys. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Aug 11 11:33:33 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5562037B400 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 11:33:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arutam.inch.com (ns.inch.com [216.223.192.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0E3F43E3B for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 11:33:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from spork@inch.com) Received: from inch.com (inch.com [216.223.192.20]) by arutam.inch.com (8.12.2/8.12.2/UTIL-INCH-3.0.6) with ESMTP id g7BIXSi9027536; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 14:33:28 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 14:33:28 -0400 (EDT) From: Charles Sprickman To: lewwid Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BASH using up major CPU while idle. Could it be caused by portupgrade? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Just out of curiousity, what does the following return? "sysctl kern.maxusers" Charles -- Charles Sprickman spork@inch.com On Sun, 11 Aug 2002, lewwid wrote: > Frequently I have had to > kill -INT 1 to reboot because nothing on the box would respond. > > I used portupgrade bash and ever since I've been getting > fork: Resource temporarily unavailable for every command. > > Maybe I'll put root's shell to tcsh and then uninstall bash, > and install it by going cd /usr/ports/shells/bash2 && make install clean > > Hopefully that will stop these errors. > > Thanks guys. > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Aug 11 15:28:58 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC24637B400; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 15:28:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns1.innn.is (ns1.innn.is [213.176.158.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E311243E4A; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 15:28:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bjorn@innn.is) Received: from exchange01.is.innn.is (exchange.innn.is [213.176.158.3]) by ns1.innn.is (Postfix) with SMTP id CE09A1AB88; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 22:28:48 +0000 (GMT) content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: Boot failed - all data lost - SOLVED X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 22:24:57 -0000 Message-ID: <09A1AF8C8C150046B67CE1A8DE345037042A19@exchange01.is.innn.is> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Boot failed - all data lost - SOLVED Thread-Index: AcI/6S3F1/eO2Ct9TwKbqpcc23kfjQBnMPaw From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_Patrick_Swift?= To: , Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, and thanks for all the replies (on and off the list). I got the machine back from my Dell vendor last Friday with the = explanation that it's BIOS (Dell A02) was broken. Under some operating = systems, disabling the USB controller could interfere with the OS's boot = process. Now, they weren't familiar with this "FreeSDF" system but they = thought that might be it. Just to be sure they decided to format the = disks, install Windows 200 Server and see if they could get the machine = to boot. It booted. This may be the best way to troubleshoot hardware, = but I beg to differ. Once back in my office I downgraded to A02 and installed FreeBSD. I = tried disabling the USB controller in the BIOS with the same results as = before. Boot failed and no sign of any data. Doing the same procedure = with A03 has no affect and therefor I have written this off as a Dell = BIOS thing. Of course, since Dell does not officially support other OSes than = Windows or Redhat linux - running FreeBSD was at my own risk and I will = have to pay for the times spent on "fixing" the machine. Thanks again for your replies, Bjorn Swift > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert L Sowders [mailto:rsowders@usgs.gov]=20 > Sent: 9. =E1g=FAst 2002 21:14 > To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: Boot failed - all data lost >=20 >=20 > Is this a SCSI disk? >=20 > I had this same problem last night, it turned out to be a bad=20 > SCSI cable.=20 > The disks were found on boot and the SCSI bios could see them=20 > on the chain=20 > but when it tried to boot it kept saying no disk found. I=20 > booted a DOS=20 > disk with fdisk and it also couldn't see the disk. I almost=20 > trashed the=20 > drive. On a whim I replaced the cable and it everything=20 > worked. It turns=20 > out the scsi cable had a bad active terminator. I replaced=20 > the cable and=20 > everything came back. >=20 > If your system is scsi, it's something to try anyway. >=20 >=20 > =20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > Hanspeter Roth > Sent by: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > 08/09/2002 12:35 PM > Please respond to freebsd-stable >=20 > =20 > To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > cc:=20 > Subject: Re: Boot failed - all data lost >=20 > On Aug 08 at 10:32, Bj=F6rn Patrick Swift spoke: >=20 > > The first error I got was from the 'FreeBSD Boot Manager'.=20 > It started as=20 > normally and displayed 'F? FreeBSD', but as I struck 'enter'=20 > I got a 'boot=20 > failed' message. Then I rebooted the machine again and=20 > started getting 'No=20 > operating system found' messages. I thought that maybe the=20 > boot record had=20 > been damaged so I booted the FreeBSD 4.6-install CD and=20 > opened fdisk - all=20 > space unused, no partitions found. No sign of my data at all! >=20 > Get your disk back from Dell. > Then try testdisk or gpart. >=20 > -Hanspeter >=20 > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message >=20 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Aug 11 16: 0:53 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82B6E37B400 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 16:00:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web13310.mail.yahoo.com (web13310.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.173.222]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 13F7F43E3B for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 16:00:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from parv_@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20020811230048.32420.qmail@web13310.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [206.133.15.202] by web13310.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 16:00:48 PDT Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 16:00:48 -0700 (PDT) From: parv Subject: boot process stuck at "start_init: trying /sbin/init" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: parv_fm@emailgroups.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG installed freebsd source is/are dated around the hours of aug 10, 11 2002. well, everything was going great... until i ran MAKEDEV thru mergemaster. after running MAKEDEV, i saw errors flying by about missing wheel & operator groups... to which i didn't pay much attention (as i was thinking that's just silly! wheel group has to be in /etc/{passwd,groups}.) since then after rebooting, i/boot process cannot go past... start_init: trying /sbin/init ...un/loading new/old kernel doesn't further the boot in any way. various devices -- cd-rw, floppy, hard drives, etc. -- are identified correctly. if it helps, kernel configuration is... http://www103.pair.com/parv/comp/unix/cf/freebsd/KERNCONF ...and not-so-old (4.6-stable jun 26-27 2002) boot log... http://www103.pair.com/parv/comp/unix/err/dmesg/delli5000e-dmesg ...what can i do now? thanks in advance. kindly cc me (parv_@yahoo.com) as i can't access freebsd list proper. - desperate freebsd user __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs http://www.hotjobs.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Aug 11 21:30:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3800037B400 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 21:30:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from home.iwata.at (home.iwata.at [211.7.156.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 77BA343E6E for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 21:30:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yutaka@iwata.at) Received: (qmail 23406 invoked by alias); 12 Aug 2002 04:30:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO 211.7.156.114) (211.7.156.3) by 0 with SMTP; 12 Aug 2002 04:30:01 -0000 Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 13:30:00 +0900 From: Yutaka Iwata X-Mailer: EdMax Ver2.85.1F MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20020812043008.77BA343E6E@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG subscribe freebsd-stable subscribe cvs-all To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Aug 11 22: 7:23 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E4BE37B400 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 22:07:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (12-233-156-170.client.attbi.com [12.233.156.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA01C43E42 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 22:07:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g7C57Rqu002085; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 22:07:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU) Received: (from das@localhost) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g7C57AGD002084; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 22:07:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU) Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 22:07:10 -0700 From: David Schultz To: Garrett Rooney Cc: Morten Rodal , kpieckiel@smartrafficenter.org, Bosko Milekic , Mario Pranjic , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SMP kernel: FreeBSD vs. Linux 2.4.x Message-ID: <20020812050710.GA1998@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Mail-Followup-To: Garrett Rooney , Morten Rodal , kpieckiel@smartrafficenter.org, Bosko Milekic , Mario Pranjic , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20020809091008.A87124@unixdaemons.com> <20020809164411.GC78503@pacer.dmz.smartrafficenter.org> <20020809171743.GB290@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20020809203355.GE6050@slurp.rodal.no> <20020809203934.GA94313@electricjellyfish.net> <20020811035646.GB589@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020811035646.GB589@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thus spake David Schultz : > That's what I heard, although I still don't know how the > approaches are different. I read the Anderson paper, but I can't > seem to find any documentation about the FreeBSD approach. (Given > the signal delivery problems we're currently having, I'd guess > that Julian et al. are going through the same hell that the > Solaris developers did when implementing threading.) Could you > please ellaborate on the differences in the FreeBSD approach? To answer on my own question based on information Julian posted to -current today: http://people.freebsd.org/~julian/freebsd_kse.tgz To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 12 0: 7:37 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F56B37B400; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 00:07:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns.itga.com.au (ns.itga.com.au [202.53.40.210]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C75443E6A; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 00:07:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnb@itga.com.au) Received: from lightning.itga.com.au (lightning.itga.com.au [192.168.71.20]) by ns.itga.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA15811; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 17:07:16 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from gnb@itga.com.au) Received: from lightning.itga.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lightning.itga.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA02637; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 17:07:13 +1000 (EST) Message-Id: <200208120707.RAA02637@lightning.itga.com.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 05/15/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 From: Gregory Bond To: stable@freebsd.org, luigi@freebsd.org Cc: production@itga.com.au Subject: major problems with recent if_fxp commit Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed ; boundary="==_Exmh_5854903580" Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 17:07:13 +1000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a multipart MIME message. --==_Exmh_5854903580 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I have a system with buildworld/installworld last done on about 1 June. It's a pretty plain-jayne HP P4 with an on-board fxp0 interface. Did a cvsup, buildworld and buildkernel and installkernel on RELENG_4 from about 1900 UTC on Satuday 10th. Rebooted before doing installworld (just to make sure). Bloody glad I did, because fxp0 is acting very very strange. If I boot multiuser, then pings from the fxp0 to other hosts work, but pings (and all other network access) from other hosts back to the FreeBSD box with fxp0 work only intermittently if at all. If I run tcpdump in promiscuous mode, then pings (and everything else) from all other hosts work as normal. Kill tcpdump, and it all stops again. Run tcpdump in non-promiscuous mode, and it doesn't work either - it sees incoming ICMP ECHO REQ but no (or only very few) outgoing ICMP ECHO REPLY. It's not a module out of date thing (no modules loaded). It's not an IPFW thing (no hits on the deny rules). We've tried from various remote boxes, including Suns, Ciscos and other FreeBSD boxes. If I revert src/dev/fxp to 2002-08-01 (while the rest of the kernel is still the 2002-08-10 version and userland still on the 06-01 version) and recompile and install /kernel, then everything works fine. If I update src/dev/fxp back to RELENG_4 (there have been no commits since approx 08-08) and reinstall the kernel, it fails again. (This is with the rest of kernel source from approx 08-10 and userland from 06-01.) This _really_ looks like something very strange with the latest fxp commit. Dmesg from a verbose boot (with the failing fxp driver) and config file attached. I'm happy to try random bits of debugging on this box if that's a help to anyone. --==_Exmh_5854903580 Content-Type: text/plain ; name="GROLLO"; charset=us-ascii Content-Description: GROLLO Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="GROLLO" # # $Id: GROLLO,v 1.3 2002/07/23 06:06:29 aaw Exp $ # $Source: /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/RCS/GROLLO,v $ # machine i386 cpu I686_CPU ident GROLLO maxusers 0 options INET #InterNETworking options FFS #Berkeley Fast Filesystem options FFS_ROOT #FFS usable as root device [keep this!] options SOFTUPDATES #Enable FFS soft updates support options UFS_DIRHASH #Improve performance on big directories options MFS #Memory Filesystem options MD_ROOT #MD is a potential root device options NFS #Network Filesystem options NFS_ROOT #NFS usable as root device, NFS required options MSDOSFS #MSDOS Filesystem options CD9660 #ISO 9660 Filesystem options CD9660_ROOT #CD-ROM usable as root, CD9660 required options PROCFS #Process filesystem options COMPAT_43 #Compatible with BSD 4.3 [KEEP THIS!] options SCSI_DELAY=5000 #Delay (in ms) before probing SCSI options UCONSOLE #Allow users to grab the console options USERCONFIG #boot -c editor options VISUAL_USERCONFIG #visual boot -c editor options KTRACE #ktrace(1) support options SYSVSHM #SYSV-style shared memory options SYSVMSG #SYSV-style message queues options SYSVSEM #SYSV-style semaphores options P1003_1B #Posix P1003_1B real-time extensions options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING options ICMP_BANDLIM #Rate limit bad replies options KBD_INSTALL_CDEV device isa device pci # Floppy drives device fdc0 at isa? port IO_FD1 irq 6 drq 2 device fd0 at fdc0 drive 0 # ATA and ATAPI devices device ata0 at isa? port IO_WD1 irq 14 device ata1 at isa? port IO_WD2 irq 15 device ata device atadisk # ATA disk drives device atapicd # ATAPI CDROM drives options ATA_STATIC_ID #Static device numbering # SCSI Controllers device ahc # AHA2940 and onboard AIC7xxx devices # SCSI peripherals device scbus # SCSI bus (required) device da # Direct Access (disks) device sa # Sequential Access (tape etc) device cd # CD device pass # Passthrough device (direct SCSI access) # atkbdc0 controls both the keyboard and the PS/2 mouse device atkbdc0 at isa? port IO_KBD device atkbd0 at atkbdc? irq 1 flags 0x1 device psm0 at atkbdc? irq 12 device vga0 at isa? # splash screen/screen saver pseudo-device splash # syscons is the default console driver, resembling an SCO console device sc0 at isa? flags 0x100 # Floating point support - do not disable. device npx0 at nexus? port IO_NPX irq 13 # Power management support (see LINT for more options) device apm0 at nexus? disable flags 0x20 # Advanced Power Management # Serial (COM) ports device sio0 at isa? port IO_COM1 flags 0x10 irq 4 device sio1 at isa? port IO_COM2 irq 3 device sio2 at isa? disable port IO_COM3 irq 5 device sio3 at isa? disable port IO_COM4 irq 9 # Parallel port device ppc0 at isa? irq 7 device ppbus # Parallel port bus (required) device lpt # Printer device ppi # Parallel port interface device # Ethernet Cards device miibus # MII bus support device fxp # Intel EtherExpress PRO/100B (82557, 82558) device xl # 3Com 3c90x # Pseudo devices - the number indicates how many units to allocate. pseudo-device loop # Network loopback pseudo-device ether # Ethernet support pseudo-device tun # Packet tunnel. pseudo-device pty # Pseudo-ttys (telnet etc) pseudo-device gif # IPv6 and IPv4 tunneling pseudo-device vn # The `bpf' pseudo-device enables the Berkeley Packet Filter. # Be aware of the administrative consequences of enabling this! pseudo-device bpf #Berkeley packet filter # USB support device uhci # UHCI PCI->USB interface device ohci # OHCI PCI->USB interface device usb # USB Bus (required) device ugen # Generic device ukbd # Keyboard device umass # Disks/Mass storage - Requires scbus and da device ums # Mouse # Firewall / Security Stuff options IPFIREWALL options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT=1000 options IPDIVERT options IPSEC options IPSEC_ESP # sound - woohoo, an onboard that works !! device pcm # stallion serial cards device stl --==_Exmh_5854903580 Content-Type: text/plain ; name="dmesg.boot"; charset=us-ascii Content-Description: dmesg.boot Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="dmesg.boot" Copyright (c) 1992-2002 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE #9: Mon Aug 12 16:40:09 EST 2002 toor@grollo.itga.com.au:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GROLLO Calibrating clock(s) ... TSC clock: 1594119832 Hz, i8254 clock: 1193204 Hz CLK_USE_I8254_CALIBRATION not specified - using default frequency Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CLK_USE_TSC_CALIBRATION not specified - using old calibration method CPU: Pentium 4 (1594.10-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf12 Stepping = 2 Features=0x3febfbff,ACC> real memory = 536805376 (524224K bytes) Physical memory chunk(s): 0x00001000 - 0x0009efff, 647168 bytes (158 pages) 0x00415000 - 0x1ffe7fff, 532492288 bytes (130003 pages) avail memory = 518299648 (506152K bytes) bios32: Found BIOS32 Service Directory header at 0xc00fda80 bios32: Entry = 0xfda90 (c00fda90) Rev = 0 Len = 1 pcibios: PCI BIOS entry at 0xdab1 pnpbios: Found PnP BIOS data at 0xc00f6ad0 pnpbios: Entry = f0000:5a47 Rev = 1.0 Other BIOS signatures found: ACPI: 000f9e30 Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc03ee000. pci_open(1): mode 1 addr port (0x0cf8) is 0x80000090 pci_open(1a): mode1res=0x80000000 (0x80000000) pci_cfgcheck: device 0 [class=060000] [hdr=00] is there (id=1a308086) Using $PIR table, 6 entries at 0xc00f7380 npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard found-> vendor=0x8086, dev=0x1a30, revid=0x03 class=06-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 map[10]: type 1, range 32, base e0000000, size 26 found-> vendor=0x8086, dev=0x1a31, revid=0x03 class=06-04-00, hdrtype=0x01, mfdev=0 subordinatebus=1 secondarybus=1 found-> vendor=0x8086, dev=0x244e, revid=0x12 class=06-04-00, hdrtype=0x01, mfdev=0 subordinatebus=2 secondarybus=2 found-> vendor=0x8086, dev=0x2440, revid=0x12 class=06-01-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=1 subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 found-> vendor=0x8086, dev=0x244b, revid=0x12 class=01-01-80, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 map[20]: type 1, range 32, base 0000fc00, size 4 found-> vendor=0x8086, dev=0x2442, revid=0x12 class=0c-03-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 intpin=d, irq=11 map[20]: type 1, range 32, base 0000d000, size 5 found-> vendor=0x8086, dev=0x2443, revid=0x12 class=0c-05-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 intpin=b, irq=0 map[20]: type 1, range 32, base 00000c00, size 4 found-> vendor=0x8086, dev=0x2444, revid=0x12 class=0c-03-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 intpin=c, irq=5 map[20]: type 1, range 32, base 0000d400, size 5 found-> vendor=0x8086, dev=0x2445, revid=0x12 class=04-01-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 intpin=b, irq=9 map[10]: type 1, range 32, base 0000dc00, size 8 map[14]: type 1, range 32, base 0000d800, size 6 pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 found-> vendor=0x1002, dev=0x5446, revid=0x00 class=03-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 intpin=a, irq=11 map[10]: type 1, range 32, base d8000000, size 26 map[14]: type 1, range 32, base 00007800, size 8 map[18]: type 1, range 32, base dfdfc000, size 14 pci1: on pcib1 pci1: (vendor=0x1002, dev=0x5446) at 0.0 irq 11 pcib2: at device 30.0 on pci0 found-> vendor=0x8086, dev=0x2449, revid=0x03 class=02-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 intpin=a, irq=10 map[10]: type 1, range 32, base dfefe000, size 12 map[14]: type 1, range 32, base 0000a800, size 6 found-> vendor=0x124d, dev=0x0003, revid=0x01 class=07-80-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 intpin=a, irq=10 map[14]: type 1, range 32, base 0000a400, size 7 map[18]: type 1, range 32, base 0000a000, size 7 found-> vendor=0x9004, dev=0x5078, revid=0x03 class=01-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 intpin=a, irq=10 map[10]: type 1, range 32, base 0000ac00, size 8 map[14]: type 1, range 32, base dfeff000, size 12 found-> vendor=0x10b7, dev=0x9200, revid=0x78 class=02-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 intpin=a, irq=9 map[10]: type 1, range 32, base 00009c00, size 7 map[14]: type 1, range 32, base dfefdf80, size 7 pci2: on pcib2 fxp0: port 0xa800-0xa83f mem 0xdfefe000-0xdfefefff irq 10 at device 8.0 on pci2 fxp0: using memory space register mapping fxp0: Ethernet address 00:04:23:06:fd:82 fxp0: PCI IDs: 8086 2449 8086 3013 0003 fxp0: Dynamic Standby mode is disabled inphy0: on miibus0 inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto bpf: fxp0 attached stl0: port 0xa000-0xa07f,0xa400-0xa47f irq 10 at device 9.0 on pci2 using shared irq10. stl0: EasyIO-PCI (driver version 2.0.0) unit=0 nrpanels=1 nrports=8 stl0: driver is using old-style compatibility shims ahc0: port 0xac00-0xacff mem 0xdfeff000-0xdfefffff irq 10 at device 10.0 on pci2 ahc0: Reading SEEPROM...done. ahc0: internal 50 cable not present ahc0: external cable is present ahc0: BIOS eeprom not present ahc0: Low byte termination Enabled ahc0: Downloading Sequencer Program... 447 instructions downloaded aic7850: Single Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 3/253 SCBs xl0: <3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port 0x9c00-0x9c7f mem 0xdfefdf80-0xdfefdfff irq 9 at device 11.0 on pci2 xl0: Ethernet address: 00:01:03:45:1d:b1 xl0: media options word: a xl0: found MII/AUTO miibus1: on xl0 ukphy0: on miibus1 ukphy0: OUI 0x00105a, model 0x0000, rev. 0 ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto bpf: xl0 attached isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xfc00-0xfc0f at device 31.1 on pci0 ata0: iobase=0x01f0 altiobase=0x03f6 bmaddr=0xfc00 ata0: mask=03 ostat0=50 ostat2=50 ata0-master: ATAPI 00 00 ata0-slave: ATAPI 00 00 ata0: mask=03 stat0=50 stat1=50 ata0-master: ATA 01 a5 ata0-slave: ATA 01 a5 ata0: devices=03 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: iobase=0x0170 altiobase=0x0376 bmaddr=0xfc08 ata1: mask=03 ostat0=50 ostat2=00 ata1-master: ATAPI 14 eb ata1-slave: ATAPI 00 00 ata1: mask=03 stat0=00 stat1=00 ata1: devices=04 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 uhci0: port 0xd000-0xd01f irq 11 at device 31.2 on pci0 usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered pci0: (vendor=0x8086, dev=0x2443) at 31.3 irq 0 uhci1: port 0xd400-0xd41f irq 5 at device 31.4 on pci0 usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered pcm0: port 0xd800-0xd83f,0xdc00-0xdcff irq 9 at device 31.5 on pci0 using shared irq9. pcm0: ac97 codec id 0x41445360 (Analog Devices AD1885) pcm0: ac97 codec features headphone, 6 bit master volume, Analog Devices Phat Stereo pcm0: ac97 primary codec extended features variable rate PCM pcm0: sndbuf_setmap 34000, 4000; 0xd5d5c000 -> 34000 pcm0: sndbuf_setmap 38000, 4000; 0xd5d60000 -> 38000 ata-: ata0 exists, using next available unit number ata-: ata1 exists, using next available unit number Trying Read_Port at 203 Trying Read_Port at 243 Trying Read_Port at 283 Trying Read_Port at 2c3 Trying Read_Port at 303 Trying Read_Port at 343 Trying Read_Port at 383 Trying Read_Port at 3c3 isa_probe_children: disabling PnP devices isa_probe_children: probing non-PnP devices orm0:
Sorry If this is a dubbelpost, I tried = to post to=20 this list via a newsgroup, but that doesn't seem to work. = (duh)
And please also reply to wijnand@office.netland.nl = because I=20 can't read my maillinglists account because of this = problem.
 
 
Yesterday I got=20 all the new sources by cvs and started the make buildworld etc..
The = whole=20 process just finished and I noticed a problem with logins: I = can't
login any=20 more.
Fortunately I didn't reboot and I've got 1 ssh connection left. = I=20 really
have to fix this one soon because it's a mailserver=20 :-(


After a unsuccessfull login attempt I see this messages = in=20 /var/log/messages

Aug 12 11:17:48 server sshd[47900]: unable to=20 dlopen(/usr/lib/pam_opie.so)
Aug 12 11:17:48 server sshd[47900]: = [dlerror:=20 /usr/lib/pam_opie.so:
Undefined symbol "_pam_log"]
Aug 12 11:17:48 = server=20 sshd[47900]: adding faulty module:
/usr/lib/pam_opie.so
Aug 12 = 11:17:48=20 server sshd[47900]: unable to dlopen(/usr/lib/pam_unix.so)
Aug 12 = 11:17:48=20 server sshd[47900]: [dlerror: /usr/lib/pam_unix.so:
Undefined symbol=20 "pam_test_option"]
Aug 12 11:17:48 server sshd[47900]: adding faulty=20 module:
/usr/lib/pam_unix.so
Aug 12 11:25:09 server = authdaemond.plain:=20 unable to
dlopen(/usr/lib/pam_unix.so)
Aug 12 11:25:09 server=20 authdaemond.plain: [dlerror: /usr/lib/pam_unix.so:
Undefined symbol=20 "pam_test_option"]
Aug 12 11:25:09 server authdaemond.plain: adding = faulty=20 module:
/usr/lib/pam_unix.so

Is this a problem in the stable=20 sources?
Does anyone know a solution?
I just noticed this also happenes on my = firewall=20 server....
 

Thanks in = advance.

Wijnand
 ------=_NextPart_000_0031_01C241FA.081F65A0-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 12 6: 2:32 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A50ED37B400 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 06:02:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns1.onie.yi.org (12-248-252-90.client.attbi.com [12.248.252.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8656843E77 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 06:02:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from neil@restricted.dyndns.org) Received: (qmail 48271 invoked by uid 89); 12 Aug 2002 13:00:46 -0000 Message-ID: <20020812130046.48270.qmail@ns1.onie.yi.org> References: <003401c241e9$453b8830$0b00a8c0@wijnand> In-Reply-To: <003401c241e9$453b8830$0b00a8c0@wijnand> From: "Ronneil Camara" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Login problems after make world Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 08:00:46 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG All I can say is that you did not read the questions prompted to you by mergemaster. Maybe you just keep on pressing I for install. :) You can try I guess boot single mode. Wijnand Wiersma writes: > Sorry If this is a dubbelpost, I tried to post to this list via a newsgroup, but that doesn't seem to work. (duh) > And please also reply to wijnand@office.netland.nl because I can't read my maillinglists account because of this problem. > > > Yesterday I got all the new sources by cvs and started the make buildworld etc.. > The whole process just finished and I noticed a problem with logins: I can't > login any more. > Fortunately I didn't reboot and I've got 1 ssh connection left. I really > have to fix this one soon because it's a mailserver :-( > > > After a unsuccessfull login attempt I see this messages in /var/log/messages > > Aug 12 11:17:48 server sshd[47900]: unable to dlopen(/usr/lib/pam_opie.so) > Aug 12 11:17:48 server sshd[47900]: [dlerror: /usr/lib/pam_opie.so: > Undefined symbol "_pam_log"] > Aug 12 11:17:48 server sshd[47900]: adding faulty module: > /usr/lib/pam_opie.so > Aug 12 11:17:48 server sshd[47900]: unable to dlopen(/usr/lib/pam_unix.so) > Aug 12 11:17:48 server sshd[47900]: [dlerror: /usr/lib/pam_unix.so: > Undefined symbol "pam_test_option"] > Aug 12 11:17:48 server sshd[47900]: adding faulty module: > /usr/lib/pam_unix.so > Aug 12 11:25:09 server authdaemond.plain: unable to > dlopen(/usr/lib/pam_unix.so) > Aug 12 11:25:09 server authdaemond.plain: [dlerror: /usr/lib/pam_unix.so: > Undefined symbol "pam_test_option"] > Aug 12 11:25:09 server authdaemond.plain: adding faulty module: > /usr/lib/pam_unix.so > > Is this a problem in the stable sources? > Does anyone know a solution? > > I just noticed this also happenes on my firewall server.... > > > Thanks in advance. > > Wijnand > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 12 6:49:31 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ADE237B400 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 06:49:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2012143E3B for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 06:49:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from owt.com (owt-207-41-94-232.owt.com [207.41.94.232]) by rutger.owt.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA23658; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 06:49:05 -0700 Message-ID: <3D57BCCF.1040601@owt.com> Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 06:49:03 -0700 From: Kent Stewart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020314 Netscape6/6.2.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us, es-mx MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wijnand Wiersma Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Login problems after make world References: <003401c241e9$453b8830$0b00a8c0@wijnand> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Wijnand Wiersma wrote: > Sorry If this is a dubbelpost, I tried to post to this list via a > newsgroup, but that doesn't seem to work. (duh) > > And please also reply to wijnand@office.netland.nl > because I can't read my maillinglists > account because of this problem. > > > > > > Yesterday I got all the new sources by cvs and started the make > buildworld etc.. > The whole process just finished and I noticed a problem with logins: I can't > login any more. > Fortunately I didn't reboot and I've got 1 ssh connection left. I really > have to fix this one soon because it's a mailserver :-( I kind of wonder how you did this upgrade. I did a buildworld, buildkernel, installkernel, reboot to single user mode, adjkerntz -i, mount -a, and did my installworld and mergemaster. The openssl was updated yesterday. I would guess that you caught the upgrade to openssl in process or you have updated and haven't followed the suggested rules of build order. For example, if you haven't rebooted, you could have an updated userland and an old kernel that can no longer finger modules. The update to openssl was done on 11 August at 1414 GMT. I cvsuped RELENG_4 on 12 August at 1301 GMT. I just finished rebooting using the new system and did not have any ssh problems getting in. Kent > > > After a unsuccessfull login attempt I see this messages in /var/log/messages > > Aug 12 11:17:48 server sshd[47900]: unable to dlopen(/usr/lib/pam_opie.so) > Aug 12 11:17:48 server sshd[47900]: [dlerror: /usr/lib/pam_opie.so: > Undefined symbol "_pam_log"] > Aug 12 11:17:48 server sshd[47900]: adding faulty module: > /usr/lib/pam_opie.so > Aug 12 11:17:48 server sshd[47900]: unable to dlopen(/usr/lib/pam_unix.so) > Aug 12 11:17:48 server sshd[47900]: [dlerror: /usr/lib/pam_unix.so: > Undefined symbol "pam_test_option"] > Aug 12 11:17:48 server sshd[47900]: adding faulty module: > /usr/lib/pam_unix.so > Aug 12 11:25:09 server authdaemond.plain: unable to > dlopen(/usr/lib/pam_unix.so) > Aug 12 11:25:09 server authdaemond.plain: [dlerror: /usr/lib/pam_unix.so: > Undefined symbol "pam_test_option"] > Aug 12 11:25:09 server authdaemond.plain: adding faulty module: > /usr/lib/pam_unix.so > > Is this a problem in the stable sources? > Does anyone know a solution? > > I just noticed this also happenes on my firewall server.... > > > > > Thanks in advance. > > Wijnand > -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 12 6:58: 4 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 717E237B400 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 06:58:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from norton.palomine.net (dsl254-102-179.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.102.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 87A6143E72 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 06:58:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cjohnson@palomine.net) Received: (qmail 46707 invoked by uid 1000); 12 Aug 2002 13:58:00 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: shamrock@cypherpunks.to, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, hemi@scoundrelz.net Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 09:58:00 -0400 From: Chris Johnson To: hemi Cc: Lucky Green , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SSHD for protocol version 2 changed? Message-ID: <20020812135800.GA46657@palomine.net> References: <01bc01c241d9$7025cf70$6801a8c0@xpserver> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 03:34:55AM -0500, hemi wrote: > I've noticed that if I delete the entry for the machine that causes PuTTY > to crash and create a new session for the machine PuTTY doesn't crash. The problem has been fixed in the latest development version of PuTTY (which I'm using now and which works fine with keyboard-interactive turned on). See http://cvs.tartarus.org/putty/ssh.c?rev=1.208&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup Chris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 12 7: 1:40 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55ED337B400 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 07:01:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from radix.cryptio.net (radix.cryptio.net [199.181.107.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 045AA43E72 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 07:01:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from emechler@radix.cryptio.net) Received: from radix.cryptio.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by radix.cryptio.net (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7CE1bk6084843 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 12 Aug 2002 07:01:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from emechler@radix.cryptio.net) Received: (from emechler@localhost) by radix.cryptio.net (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g7CE1b6J084842; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 07:01:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 07:01:37 -0700 From: Erick Mechler To: Justin Mitchell Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sysinstall install.cfg help Message-ID: <20020812140137.GO343@techometer.net> References: <200208110026.AA3796697162@justinmitchell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200208110026.AA3796697162@justinmitchell.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG (this should have gone to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org) :: Hiya. I'm setting up a config for an automated install with freebsd 4.6 :: and have run into one little issue. It doesn't appear to be running the :: configuration to setup my hostname, ip address, etc. Pretty much :: everything in /etc/rc.conf is missing. I looked around, and noticed that in :: old versions of freebsd that you needed to install the package "ari-0.0", :: but I didn't see anything like that in the current package INDEX. Any :: ideas as to what I need to do? I'd also like to know how to setup initial :: user accounts and the root password if that's possible. Judging by the nature of your questions, I'd say the best thing for you to do is to check out the FreeBSD handbook. It should be able to answer all of your questions. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/index.html Cheers - Erick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 12 7:23:20 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23FA337B400 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 07:23:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay.cigital.com (relay.cigital.com [64.80.176.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB9943E65 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 07:23:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yanek@cigital.com) Received: from exchange.cigital.com (exchange.cigital.com [10.1.20.3]) by relay.cigital.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F93FBB43; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 10:23:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: by exchange.cigital.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) id ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 10:12:39 -0400 Message-ID: <51CC94132526754995E79DCF28C0C34D09BBFD@exchange.cigital.com> From: Yanek Korff To: 'Doug Silver' Cc: "'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" Subject: RE: NIS fails after upgrade to 4.6 Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 10:12:37 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > It's reversed -- the FBSD box is the client, Solaris is the > NIS master, so it's using crypt by default. Perhaps running a ktrace -di when you manually start NIS services would yield additional info...? -Yanek. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 12 7:40: 5 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5669E37B400 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 07:40:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx.wiersma.be (ip3e83cfb0.speed.planet.nl [62.131.207.176]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66A0143E3B for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 07:39:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wijnand@wiersma.be) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.wiersma.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id D77B713134 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 16:41:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wijnand.wiersma.be (wijnand [192.168.0.11]) by mx.wiersma.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id B95471312F for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 16:40:54 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <5.1.1.6.0.20020812163858.00b184e8@192.168.0.2> X-Sender: wijnand@192.168.0.2 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 16:40:08 +0200 To: FreeBSD-stable@FreeBSD.org From: Wijnand Wiersma Subject: Re: Login problems after make world In-Reply-To: <3D57BCCF.1040601@owt.com> References: <003401c241e9$453b8830$0b00a8c0@wijnand> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020300 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thanks for your replies. I thought I couldn't get in anymore after a reboot, so I skipped that part. (I do that all the time after a upgrade, never been a problem before). But I added another root user without a passwd so I could login at the console. But then, by accident, I noticed my logins per imap were successfull again. I tested my gw server after a reboot and that was alright too. I wanted to wait with rebooting the machines, but in this case I had to. But thanks guys! Wijnand To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 12 9:15:54 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC39537B4EF; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 09:15:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout05.sul.t-online.com (mailout05.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E801043E72; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 09:15:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bfischer@Techfak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE) Received: from fwd03.sul.t-online.de by mailout05.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 17eHr5-0007Mr-0A; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 18:15:43 +0200 Received: from no-support.loc (520094253176-0001@[80.130.215.43]) by fmrl03.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 17eHsK-1IPhjsC; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 18:17:00 +0200 Received: from frolic.no-support.loc (localhost.no-support.loc [127.0.0.1]) by no-support.loc (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g7CGFT8e001127; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 18:15:29 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from bjoern@frolic.no-support.loc) Received: (from bjoern@localhost) by frolic.no-support.loc (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g7CGFT6F001126; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 18:15:29 +0200 (CEST) From: Bjoern Fischer Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 18:15:29 +0200 To: Nick Hibma , stable@freebsd.org Cc: re@freebsd.org Subject: usb MFC? [was: HEADS UP: FreeBSD 4.7 Code Freeze] Message-ID: <20020812161529.GA986@no-support.loc> References: <20020812020807.G19262@freebsdmall.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020812020807.G19262@freebsdmall.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i X-Sender: 520094253176-0001@t-dialin.net Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello Nick, > has been introduced since 4.6. Please email the relevant > maintainers/committers for any specific bug fixes or enhancements that > you think should be MFCed for FreeBSD 4.7. there were some code resyncs with NetBSD's usb stack on -CURRENT. Any chances to MFC that? (and USB-2.0? Just dreaming...) With 4.6 I'm experiencing some problems w/ attaching/detaching umass devices. The first time it works perfectly, but when I try to attach my AJBR-20 a second time, the machine hangs and reboots. No chance to drop into debugger, no panic. I tried UMASS_DEBUG and stuffed some additional DPRINTFs into umass.c: Nothing. The problem is probably somewhere else in the usb stack. Before I dig deeper into -STABLE usb, I'd like to know if there's a MFC of the usb stack planned. I don't want to waste my time with old code. Bjorn Fischer -- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- GCS d--(+) s++: a- C+++(-) UB++++OSI++++$ P+++(-) L---(++) !E W- N+ o>+ K- !w !O !M !V PS++ PE- PGP++ t+++ !5 X++ tv- b+++ D++ G e+ h-- y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 12 9:26:41 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 922E937B400 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 09:26:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (rwcrmhc51.attbi.com [204.127.198.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294A743E42 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 09:26:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from davep@meduseld.net) Received: from baloo.meduseld.net ([66.30.120.53]) by rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020812162630.DPZL19356.rwcrmhc51.attbi.com@baloo.meduseld.net> for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 16:26:30 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by baloo.meduseld.net (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g7CGQdQx072024 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 12:26:39 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from davep@meduseld.net) Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 12:26:38 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <20020812.122638.115901950.davep@meduseld.net> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Request for micro patch to /etc/defaults/rc.conf From: "David A. Panariti" X-Attribution: davep X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on XEmacs 21.4.8 (Honest Recruiter) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; boundary="--Next_Part(Mon_Aug_12_12:26:38_2002_563)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ----Next_Part(Mon_Aug_12_12:26:38_2002_563)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In /etc/defaults/rc.conf, the variants of sendmail are started up with differing -L options for easy log-file identification. However, both sendmail_submit and regular sendmail use -L sm-mta. This reduces the usefulness of -L, since two variants use the same label. I know I can change this in my /etc/rc.conf, but I believe this is universally useful. (If not, I feel it is at least not harmful), and removes the headache of watching sendmail_submit_flags for changes. In the patch, I use `sm-lmta' for the local mta label. However, any unique, informative label would be useful. `sm-submit' is another obvious choice. I'm cvsupping the security branch, so if this has been changed in stable please excuse the interruption. thanks, davep ----Next_Part(Mon_Aug_12_12:26:38_2002_563)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="rc.conf.diff" --- rc.conf.orig2 Mon Aug 12 12:03:28 2002 +++ rc.conf Mon Aug 12 12:03:53 2002 @@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ # If NONE, don't start any sendmail processes. sendmail_flags="-L sm-mta -bd -q30m" # Flags to sendmail (as a server) sendmail_submit_enable="YES" # Start a localhost-only MTA for mail submission -sendmail_submit_flags="-L sm-mta -bd -q30m -ODaemonPortOptions=Addr=localhost" +sendmail_submit_flags="-L sm-lmta -bd -q30m -ODaemonPortOptions=Addr=localhost" # Flags for localhost-only MTA sendmail_outbound_enable="YES" # Dequeue stuck mail (YES/NO). sendmail_outbound_flags="-L sm-queue -q30m" # Flags to sendmail (outbound only) ----Next_Part(Mon_Aug_12_12:26:38_2002_563)---- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 12 11:53:37 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD5D237B400 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 11:53:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from peterson.ath.cx (12-254-245-65.client.attbi.com [12.254.245.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49E3443E42 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 11:53:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jlp@peterson.ath.cx) Received: from aurora.peterson.ath.cx (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by peterson.ath.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B62BAAC45 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 12:53:36 -0600 (MDT) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 From: "Jan L. Peterson" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: before 4.7 code freeze X-face: p=61=y<.Il$z+k*y~"j>%c[8R~8{j3WTnaSd-'RyC>t.Ub>AAm\zYA#5JF +W=G?EI+|EI);]=fs_MOfKN0n9`OlmB[1^0;L^64K5][nOb&gv/n}p@mm06|J|WNa asp7mMEw0w)e_6T~7v-\]yHKvI^1}[2k)] Dcc: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 12:53:36 -0600 Message-Id: <20020812185336.5B62BAAC45@peterson.ath.cx> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Can someone look at conf/38559 before the 4.7 freeze? -jan- -- Jan L. Peterson To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 12 12:15:35 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74C6337B400 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 12:15:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.urchin.com (ns2.quantified.com [63.212.171.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E51443E42 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 12:15:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dsilver@urchin.com) Received: from danzig.sd.quantified.net (web.quantified.com [63.212.171.5]) by mail.urchin.com (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g7CJG1Vo077243; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 12:15:39 -0701 (PDT) (envelope-from dsilver@urchin.com) Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 12:14:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Silver X-Sender: dsilver@danzig.sd.quantified.net To: Yanek Korff Cc: "'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" Subject: RE: NIS fails after upgrade to 4.6 In-Reply-To: <51CC94132526754995E79DCF28C0C34D09BBFD@exchange.cigital.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Filter-Version: 1.7 (mail.urchin.com) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Yanek Korff wrote: > > It's reversed -- the FBSD box is the client, Solaris is the > > NIS master, so it's using crypt by default. > > Perhaps running a ktrace -di when you manually start NIS services would > yield additional info...? > > -Yanek. > I ran 'ktrace -di ypbind -s' which created the ktrace.out file, but I'm not sure what to do with it at this point. What tools are used to read it since it's a data file? Thanks! -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Doug Silver Network Manager Urchin Software Corp. http://www.urchin.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 12 12:19:53 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF12D37B400 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 12:19:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from theshell.com (arsenic.theshell.com [63.236.138.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B10743E75 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 12:19:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pavalos@theshell.com) Received: (qmail 96612 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2002 19:19:48 -0000 Received: from radium.theshell.com (pavalos@63.236.138.3) by arsenic.theshell.com with SMTP; 12 Aug 2002 19:19:48 -0000 Received: (from pavalos@localhost) by radium.theshell.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) id g7CJJcpN075198; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 12:19:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pavalos) Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 12:19:38 -0700 From: Peter Avalos To: Doug Silver Cc: Yanek Korff , "'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: NIS fails after upgrade to 4.6 Message-ID: <20020812191938.GA73386@theshell.com> Mail-Followup-To: Doug Silver , Yanek Korff , "'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" References: <51CC94132526754995E79DCF28C0C34D09BBFD@exchange.cigital.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ibTvN161/egqYuK8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --ibTvN161/egqYuK8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 12:14:12PM -0700, Doug Silver wrote: >=20 > I ran 'ktrace -di ypbind -s' which created the ktrace.out file, but I'm > not sure what to do with it at this point. What tools are used to read > it since it's a data file? >=20 kdump(1) --ibTvN161/egqYuK8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9WApKKjaxugguz8URAgiUAJ0T4RgsRSKn/YKxsNtFOWC0iOaFMgCfYlCE T2VgtrYDxbJ3DCWpgWONorE= =kZ8t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ibTvN161/egqYuK8-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 12 12:37:18 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E2237B400; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 12:37:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from genius.tao.org.uk (genius.tao.org.uk [212.135.162.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1838D43E65; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 12:37:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from joe@genius.tao.org.uk) Received: by genius.tao.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 100) id 7DAC650; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 20:37:12 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 20:37:12 +0100 From: Josef Karthauser To: Bjoern Fischer Cc: Nick Hibma , stable@freebsd.org, re@freebsd.org Subject: Re: usb MFC? [was: HEADS UP: FreeBSD 4.7 Code Freeze] Message-ID: <20020812193712.GA369@genius.tao.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Josef Karthauser , Bjoern Fischer , Nick Hibma , stable@freebsd.org, re@freebsd.org References: <20020812020807.G19262@freebsdmall.com> <20020812161529.GA986@no-support.loc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020812161529.GA986@no-support.loc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 06:15:29PM +0200, Bjoern Fischer wrote: > Hello Nick, >=20 > > has been introduced since 4.6. Please email the relevant > > maintainers/committers for any specific bug fixes or enhancements that > > you think should be MFCed for FreeBSD 4.7. >=20 > there were some code resyncs with NetBSD's usb stack on -CURRENT. > Any chances to MFC that? (and USB-2.0? Just dreaming...) >=20 > With 4.6 I'm experiencing some problems w/ attaching/detaching > umass devices. The first time it works perfectly, but when I try > to attach my AJBR-20 a second time, the machine hangs and reboots. > No chance to drop into debugger, no panic. I tried UMASS_DEBUG > and stuffed some additional DPRINTFs into umass.c: Nothing. The > problem is probably somewhere else in the usb stack. >=20 > Before I dig deeper into -STABLE usb, I'd like to know if there's > a MFC of the usb stack planned. I don't want to waste my time with > old code. There is an MFC planned, but I doubt that it will be in place before 4.7. There are some problems that I've not fixed in the -current stack yet and I don't want to inflict them on -stable. Joe --=20 "As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain; and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality." - Albert Einstein, 1921 --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAj1YDmYACgkQXVIcjOaxUBaKdwCgkA/+8Y2zorTWTHZqlEIjePBY /8kAn0gxtQzJ4rqJ9psfv4mUxOAjMr8o =klmr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 12 12:43:55 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37EB637B400 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 12:43:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.urchin.com (ns2.quantified.com [63.212.171.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D50943E88 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 12:43:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dsilver@urchin.com) Received: from danzig.sd.quantified.net (web.quantified.com [63.212.171.5]) by mail.urchin.com (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g7CJj8Vo077736 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 12:44:46 -0701 (PDT) (envelope-from dsilver@urchin.com) Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 12:43:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Silver X-Sender: dsilver@danzig.sd.quantified.net To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NIS fails after upgrade to 4.6 In-Reply-To: <20020812191938.GA73386@theshell.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Filter-Version: 1.7 (mail.urchin.com) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Peter Avalos wrote: > On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 12:14:12PM -0700, Doug Silver wrote: > > > > I ran 'ktrace -di ypbind -s' which created the ktrace.out file, but I'm > > not sure what to do with it at this point. What tools are used to read > > it since it's a data file? > > > > kdump(1) > (RTFM ktrace -> RTFM kdump)! Ok, I've read through the output, but I'm not familiar enough with ypbind/etc to decode what it really means (see below for some sample output). -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Doug Silver Network Manager Urchin Software Corp. http://www.urchin.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 19080 ypbind CALL gettimeofday(0xbfbff598,0) 19080 ypbind RET gettimeofday 0 19080 ypbind CALL select(0x5,0xbfbff608,0,0,0xbfbff590) 19080 ypbind RET select 1 19080 ypbind CALL recvfrom(0x4,0x804f068,0x190,0,0xbfbff5f8,0xbfbff574) 19080 ypbind GIO fd 4 read 28 bytes "\M^C\M-b\M-+d\0\0\0\^A\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0" 19080 ypbind RET recvfrom 28/0x1c 19080 ypbind CALL close(0x4) 19080 ypbind RET close 0 19080 ypbind CALL close(0x4) 19080 ypbind RET close -1 errno 9 Bad file descriptor 19080 ypbind CALL socket(0x2,0x2,0x11) 19080 ypbind RET socket 4 19080 ypbind CALL getsockopt(0x4,0,0x13,0xbfbff60c,0xbfbff610) 19080 ypbind RET getsockopt 0 19080 ypbind CALL setsockopt(0x4,0,0x13,0xbfbff608,0x4) 19080 ypbind RET setsockopt 0 19080 ypbind CALL bind(0x4,0xbfbff6f8,0x10) 19080 ypbind RET bind 0 19080 ypbind CALL getsockname(0x4,0xbfbff6f8,0xbfbff614) 19080 ypbind RET getsockname 0 19080 ypbind CALL getsockname(0x4,0xbfbff6f8,0xbfbff6f4) 19080 ypbind RET getsockname 0 19080 ypbind CALL break(0x8054000) 19080 ypbind RET break 0 19080 ypbind CALL break(0x8055000) 19080 ypbind RET break 0 19080 ypbind CALL stat(0x280e5b80,0xbfbff688) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 12 13: 1:24 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B56BE37B406 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 13:01:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tomts21-srv.bellnexxia.net (tomts21.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4294443E65 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 13:01:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hottymaria@gosympatico.ca) Received: from [209.226.175.136] by tomts21-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.04.19 201-253-122-122-119-20020516) with SMTP id <20020812200008.JNFK11845.tomts21-srv.bellnexxia.net@[209.226.175.136]>; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 16:00:08 -0400 From: To: Subject: Hey, whats up? Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 16:01:51 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20020812200008.JNFK11845.tomts21-srv.bellnexxia.net@[209.226.175.136]> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

My buddies and I were average people, just like you...Then we had our great idea...
find young hot girls and proposition them to fool around on video tape.
Armed with a camera, a smooth tongue, and a couple of bucks we have made quite a few interesting videos!
BEST OF ALL... MY SITE IS 100% FREE!! If this sounds like something of interest to you, click here You will be glad you did.











If you never want to hear from me again, please click here and I will remove you from all future mailings.

----- Get your free WebMail account from Sympatico-Lycos at www.sympatico.ca ----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 12 13:17:15 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 388CC37B400 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 13:17:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay.cigital.com (relay.cigital.com [64.80.176.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B037C43E6A for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 13:17:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yanek@cigital.com) Received: from exchange.cigital.com (exchange.cigital.com [10.1.20.3]) by relay.cigital.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0A6ABA4B; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 16:17:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: by exchange.cigital.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) id ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 16:06:31 -0400 Message-ID: <51CC94132526754995E79DCF28C0C34D09BC08@exchange.cigital.com> From: Yanek Korff To: 'Doug Silver' , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: NIS fails after upgrade to 4.6 Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 16:06:30 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG You may want to run kdump -lf on your ktrace.out file and see what happens when you try and log in... -Yanek. > -----Original Message----- > From: Doug Silver [mailto:dsilver@urchin.com] > Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 15:43 > To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: NIS fails after upgrade to 4.6 > > > On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Peter Avalos wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 12:14:12PM -0700, Doug Silver wrote: > > > > > > I ran 'ktrace -di ypbind -s' which created the ktrace.out > file, but I'm > > > not sure what to do with it at this point. What tools > are used to read > > > it since it's a data file? > > > > > > > kdump(1) > > > > (RTFM ktrace -> RTFM kdump)! > > Ok, I've read through the output, but I'm not familiar enough with > ypbind/etc to decode what it really means (see below for some sample > output). > > -- > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Doug Silver > Network Manager > Urchin Software Corp. http://www.urchin.com > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > 19080 ypbind CALL gettimeofday(0xbfbff598,0) > 19080 ypbind RET gettimeofday 0 > 19080 ypbind CALL select(0x5,0xbfbff608,0,0,0xbfbff590) > 19080 ypbind RET select 1 > 19080 ypbind CALL > recvfrom(0x4,0x804f068,0x190,0,0xbfbff5f8,0xbfbff574) > 19080 ypbind GIO fd 4 read 28 bytes > > "\M^C\M-b\M-+d\0\0\0\^A\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0" > 19080 ypbind RET recvfrom 28/0x1c > 19080 ypbind CALL close(0x4) > 19080 ypbind RET close 0 > 19080 ypbind CALL close(0x4) > 19080 ypbind RET close -1 errno 9 Bad file descriptor > 19080 ypbind CALL socket(0x2,0x2,0x11) > 19080 ypbind RET socket 4 > 19080 ypbind CALL getsockopt(0x4,0,0x13,0xbfbff60c,0xbfbff610) > 19080 ypbind RET getsockopt 0 > 19080 ypbind CALL setsockopt(0x4,0,0x13,0xbfbff608,0x4) > 19080 ypbind RET setsockopt 0 > 19080 ypbind CALL bind(0x4,0xbfbff6f8,0x10) > 19080 ypbind RET bind 0 > 19080 ypbind CALL getsockname(0x4,0xbfbff6f8,0xbfbff614) > 19080 ypbind RET getsockname 0 > 19080 ypbind CALL getsockname(0x4,0xbfbff6f8,0xbfbff6f4) > 19080 ypbind RET getsockname 0 > 19080 ypbind CALL break(0x8054000) > 19080 ypbind RET break 0 > 19080 ypbind CALL break(0x8055000) > 19080 ypbind RET break 0 > 19080 ypbind CALL stat(0x280e5b80,0xbfbff688) > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 12 13:52:18 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E1D037B400 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 13:52:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.urchin.com (ns2.quantified.com [63.212.171.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FD5143E3B for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 13:52:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dsilver@urchin.com) Received: from danzig.sd.quantified.net (web.quantified.com [63.212.171.5]) by mail.urchin.com (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g7CKrvVo078784; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 13:53:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dsilver@urchin.com) Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 13:52:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Silver X-Sender: dsilver@danzig.sd.quantified.net To: Yanek Korff Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: NIS fails after upgrade to 4.6 In-Reply-To: <51CC94132526754995E79DCF28C0C34D09BC08@exchange.cigital.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Filter-Version: 1.7 (mail.urchin.com) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Yanek Korff wrote: > You may want to run kdump -lf on your ktrace.out file and see what happens > when you try and log in... > > -Yanek. > It did not give anything upon attempting to login, but a few seconds later it did output the following. I'm not sure if that's just a status check of some sort. I attempted to run 'ssh -v localhost', and that didn't really change the ktrace.out file at that moment. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Doug Silver Network Manager Urchin Software Corp. http://www.urchin.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 19080 ypbind RET select 0 19080 ypbind CALL gettimeofday(0xbfbff6a0,0) 19080 ypbind RET gettimeofday 0 19080 ypbind CALL getpid 19080 ypbind RET getpid 19080/0x4a88 19080 ypbind CALL socket(0x2,0x2,0x11) 19080 ypbind RET socket 7 19080 ypbind CALL getsockname(0x7,0xbfbff5b8,0xbfbff5b4) 19080 ypbind RET getsockname 0 19080 ypbind CALL getsockopt(0x7,0,0x13,0xbfbff5ac,0xbfbff5b0) 19080 ypbind RET getsockopt 0 19080 ypbind CALL setsockopt(0x7,0,0x13,0xbfbff5a8,0x4) 19080 ypbind RET setsockopt 0 19080 ypbind CALL bind(0x7,0xbfbff5b8,0x10) 19080 ypbind RET bind 0 19080 ypbind CALL ioctl(0x7,FIONBIO,0xbfbff69c) 19080 ypbind RET ioctl 0 19080 ypbind CALL sendto(0x7,0x80561f8,0x34,0,0x8056008,0x10) 19080 ypbind GIO fd 7 wrote 52 bytes "\M^C\M-ftv\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\^B\0\^A\M^F\M-$\0\0\0\^B\0\0\0\^A\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\ \0\^Furchin\0\0" 19080 ypbind RET sendto 52/0x34 19080 ypbind CALL gettimeofday(0xbfbff5e8,0) 19080 ypbind RET gettimeofday 0 19080 ypbind CALL select(0x8,0xbfbff658,0,0,0xbfbff5e0) 19080 ypbind RET select 1 19080 ypbind CALL recvfrom(0x7,0x8056068,0x190,0,0xbfbff648,0xbfbff5c4) 19080 ypbind GIO fd 7 read 28 bytes "\M^C\M-ftv\0\0\0\^A\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\^A" 19080 ypbind RET recvfrom 28/0x1c 19080 ypbind CALL close(0x7) 19080 ypbind RET close 0 19080 ypbind CALL select(0x3bd,0x804cc00,0,0,0xbfbff780) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 12 13:58:25 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 647EA37B400; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 13:58:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arg1.demon.co.uk (arg1.demon.co.uk [62.49.12.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A624243E75; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 13:58:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from arg-bsd@arg1.demon.co.uk) Received: by arg1.demon.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1002) id B16AE9B04; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 21:58:18 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arg1.demon.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id A860C5D27; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 21:58:18 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 21:58:18 +0100 (BST) From: Andrew Gordon X-X-Sender: To: Josef Karthauser Cc: , Subject: Re: usb MFC? [was: HEADS UP: FreeBSD 4.7 Code Freeze] In-Reply-To: <20020812193712.GA369@genius.tao.org.uk> Message-ID: <20020812215059.N59573-100000@server.arg.sj.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Josef Karthauser wrote: > On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 06:15:29PM +0200, Bjoern Fischer wrote: > > > > Before I dig deeper into -STABLE usb, I'd like to know if there's > > a MFC of the usb stack planned. I don't want to waste my time with > > old code. > > There is an MFC planned, but I doubt that it will be in place before > 4.7. There are some problems that I've not fixed in the -current stack > yet and I don't want to inflict them on -stable. OTOH, the stuff presently in -stable isn't trouble-free either. I've been running your RELENG_4-USB-20020301.patch patches on a number of machines since you released them, and they have made major improvements to performance and stability. For me, the unpatched stable was just too flaky to be useable; the patched version is not quite perfect but very useable. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 12 14: 5:48 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A958A37B400 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 14:05:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from prometheus.vh.laserfence.net (prometheus.laserfence.net [196.44.73.116]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7157E43E4A for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 14:05:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from will@highveldcs.com) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (helo=phoenix.vh.laserfence.net) by prometheus.vh.laserfence.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 17eMNW-00008d-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 23:05:30 +0200 Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 23:05:14 +0200 (SAST) From: Willie Viljoen X-X-Sender: will@phoenix.vh.laserfence.net To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Ethernet Bridging sysctls not taking effect? Message-ID: <20020812230244.J6225-100000@phoenix.vh.laserfence.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I noticed a small hitch with ethernet bridging when a power failure rebooted a machine tonight... It seems that if sysctls for bridging are placed in /etc/sysctl.conf, they are set to those values, but the kernel doesn't seem to take notice. Bridging only starts working once the sysctls are set -again- at run time. Could sysctl.conf be getting processed before code needed for bridging comes into effect? Bridging is compiled into the kernel on the machine. Does anybody know why this would be happening? I've devised a temporary solution for people who have noticed this, simply set the sysctls again from a file like /usr/local/etc/rc.d/bridge.sh or something to the same effect. Will -- Willie Viljoen Highveld Computing Solutions 214 Paul Kruger Avenue Universitas Bloemfontein 9321 South Africa +27 51 522 15 60, a/h +27 51 522 44 36 +27 82 404 03 27 will@highveldcs.com To find out how we can help you with inventive solutions, visit http://www.highveldcs.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 12 14:58:56 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FE9D37B400 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 14:58:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tomts12-srv.bellnexxia.net (tomts12.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F78443E3B for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 14:58:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hottymaria@gosympatico.ca) Received: from [209.226.175.136] by tomts12-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.04.19 201-253-122-122-119-20020516) with SMTP id <20020812215910.CFQN14522.tomts12-srv.bellnexxia.net@[209.226.175.136]>; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 17:59:10 -0400 From: To: Subject: Hey, whats up? Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 17:59:39 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20020812215910.CFQN14522.tomts12-srv.bellnexxia.net@[209.226.175.136]> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

My buddies and I were average people, just like you...Then we had our great idea...
find young hot girls and proposition them to fool around on video tape.
Armed with a camera, a smooth tongue, and a couple of bucks we have made quite a few interesting videos!
BEST OF ALL... MY SITE IS 100% FREE!! If this sounds like something of interest to you, click here You will be glad you did.











If you never want to hear from me again, please click here and I will remove you from all future mailings.

----- Get your free WebMail account from Sympatico-Lycos at www.sympatico.ca ----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 12 15:28:29 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 138EF37B400; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 15:28:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from edgemaster.zombie.org (ip68-13-69-9.om.om.cox.net [68.13.69.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B50DC43E4A; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 15:28:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from smkelly@zombie.org) Received: by edgemaster.zombie.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 564B766B04; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 17:28:25 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 17:28:25 -0500 From: Sean Kelly To: stable@freebsd.org, sound@freebsd.org Subject: kern/35004: Before code freeze?! Message-ID: <20020812222825.GA6999@edgemaster.zombie.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG After having problems with channel lockups (Device busy) with the pcm driver, I went diving through the GNATS db and found kern/35004. I've applied the patch within that PR and it seems to have solved all my problems with sound. I've seen several people in the last few months on this list mention the problem denoted in this PR and the PR has been around since February with no progress made. I've already made one plea to -stable for somebody to take a look at this and commit it, but got no bites except people replying aying "Thanks! It fixed my problem!" So please, could somebody please go look at this? http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/35004 -- Sean Kelly | PGP KeyID: 77042C7B smkelly@zombie.org | http://www.zombie.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 12 15:47:55 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D839737B400 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 15:47:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thought.holo.org (w120.z064002057.sjc-ca.dsl.cnc.net [64.2.57.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DC4943E6E for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 15:47:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bwb@holo.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thought.holo.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7CMlu6k045711 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 15:47:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bwb@holo.org) Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 15:47:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Brian Buchanan To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Please apply kern/36605 for 4.7 Message-ID: <20020812154358.Q45704-100000@thought.holo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Would someone mind applying the patch in kern/36605 to stable before the code freeze? This fixes a panic when running sysctl -a on a machine with 2GB or more of RAM. I originally discovered this on a 4.3 kernel patched to fix the swap allocation bug, but have received reports of it still being broken in 4.6 and the patch resolving the problem. Thanks! - Brian -- Brian Buchanan bwb@holo.org -------------------------------------------------------------------------- FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! http://www.freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 12 15:51:27 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B997137B400; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 15:51:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from puma.icir.org (puma.icir.org [192.150.187.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F97243E6E; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 15:51:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hodson@puma.icir.org) Received: from puma.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by puma.icir.org (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g7CMpCY43206; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 15:51:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hodson@puma.icir.org) Message-Id: <200208122251.g7CMpCY43206@puma.icir.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.3 To: Sean Kelly Cc: stable@freebsd.org, sound@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/35004: Before code freeze?! In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 12 Aug 2002 17:28:25 CDT." <20020812222825.GA6999@edgemaster.zombie.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 15:51:12 -0700 From: Orion Hodson Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG /-- Sean Kelly wrote: | After having problems with channel lockups (Device busy) with the pcm | driver, I went diving through the GNATS db and found kern/35004. I've applied | the patch within that PR and it seems to have solved all my problems with sou | nd. | | I've seen several people in the last few months on this list mention the | problem denoted in this PR and the PR has been around since February with | no progress made. I've already made one plea to -stable for somebody to | take a look at this and commit it, but got no bites except people replying | aying "Thanks! It fixed my problem!" | | So please, could somebody please go look at this? | http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/35004 I started looking at this a week or two ago and appreciate there is a problem. There are some cases that I'm not 100% convinced about at present: hence the neither the patch nor a re-worked version has been applied yet. - Orion To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 12 16: 9:10 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AFB837B400; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 16:09:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from genius.tao.org.uk (genius.tao.org.uk [212.135.162.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C43D43E6A; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 16:09:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from joe@genius.tao.org.uk) Received: by genius.tao.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 100) id 35D68CF; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 22:37:00 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 22:37:00 +0100 From: Josef Karthauser To: Andrew Gordon Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: usb MFC? [was: HEADS UP: FreeBSD 4.7 Code Freeze] Message-ID: <20020812213700.GE369@genius.tao.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Josef Karthauser , Andrew Gordon , stable@freebsd.org References: <20020812193712.GA369@genius.tao.org.uk> <20020812215059.N59573-100000@server.arg.sj.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jKBxcB1XkHIR0Eqt" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020812215059.N59573-100000@server.arg.sj.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --jKBxcB1XkHIR0Eqt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [re@freebsd.org moved to Bcc:] On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 09:58:18PM +0100, Andrew Gordon wrote: >=20 > OTOH, the stuff presently in -stable isn't trouble-free either. I've been > running your RELENG_4-USB-20020301.patch patches on a number of machines > since you released them, and they have made major improvements to > performance and stability. For me, the unpatched stable was just too > flaky to be useable; the patched version is not quite perfect but very > useable. >=20 I attempted a merge in February but ended up breaking ulpt which I think that a lot of people are using. It's broken in current at the moment too. It would help if I had an idea of what works and what's broken in -stable for usb. I'd welcome reports from usb users. Joe --=20 "As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain; and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality." - Albert Einstein, 1921 --jKBxcB1XkHIR0Eqt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAj1YKnsACgkQXVIcjOaxUBbshQCg1AwwGONbPT2oANksNB8WTIRH i3UAniXs0P45dBRYEdoIZspIdrwWscTE =aBe2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jKBxcB1XkHIR0Eqt-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 12 16:17:17 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 389F337B400 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 16:17:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from topaz.mdcc.cx (topaz.mdcc.cx [212.204.230.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80B3143E70 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 16:17:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from edwin@mavetju.org) Received: from k7.mavetju (topaz.mdcc.cx [212.204.230.141]) by topaz.mdcc.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DEA22B739; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 01:17:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: by k7.mavetju (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7938F6A7123; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 09:16:58 +1000 (EST) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 09:16:58 +1000 From: Edwin Groothuis To: Josef Karthauser Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: usb MFC? [was: HEADS UP: FreeBSD 4.7 Code Freeze] Message-ID: <20020812231658.GB785@k7.mavetju> References: <20020812193712.GA369@genius.tao.org.uk> <20020812215059.N59573-100000@server.arg.sj.co.uk> <20020812213700.GE369@genius.tao.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020812213700.GE369@genius.tao.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 10:37:00PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote: > On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 09:58:18PM +0100, Andrew Gordon wrote: > I attempted a merge in February but ended up breaking ulpt which I think > that a lot of people are using. It's broken in current at the moment > too. > > It would help if I had an idea of what works and what's broken in > -stable for usb. I'd welcome reports from usb users. This is one from me. Note that it's not tested on 4.6 yet (still not brave enough to upgrade) USB reattach of Sony DSC-S75 fails, USB subsystem hangs http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern%2F35756 Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.MavEtJu.org edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/weblog.php bash$ :(){ :|:&};: | Interested in MUDs? http://www.FatalDimensions.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 12 16:27:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D04137B400 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 16:27:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4C91143E42 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 16:27:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from iedowse@maths.tcd.ie) Received: from walton.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP id ; 13 Aug 2002 00:27:06 +0100 (BST) To: Brian Buchanan Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Please apply kern/36605 for 4.7 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 12 Aug 2002 15:47:56 PDT." <20020812154358.Q45704-100000@thought.holo.org> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 00:27:05 +0100 From: Ian Dowse Message-ID: <200208130027.aa97334@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20020812154358.Q45704-100000@thought.holo.org>, Brian Buchanan writ es: >Would someone mind applying the patch in kern/36605 to stable before the >code freeze? This fixes a panic when running sysctl -a on a machine with >2GB or more of RAM. I originally discovered this on a 4.3 kernel patched >to fix the swap allocation bug, but have received reports of it still >being broken in 4.6 and the patch resolving the problem. Thanks for the reminder. Just looking at the patch, it seems that in the first chunk, the code can be further simplified by unconditionally using zlist as the `next' pointer. I will commit the following shortly: Ian Index: vm_zone.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/iedowse/CVS/src/sys/vm/Attic/vm_zone.c,v retrieving revision 1.30.2.4 diff -u -r1.30.2.4 vm_zone.c --- vm_zone.c 14 Dec 2001 19:08:55 -0000 1.30.2.4 +++ vm_zone.c 12 Aug 2002 23:17:29 -0000 @@ -145,12 +145,8 @@ z->znalloc = 0; z->zitems = NULL; - if (zlist == 0) { - zlist = z; - } else { - z->znext = zlist; - zlist = z; - } + z->znext = zlist; + zlist = z; } z->zflags |= flags; @@ -165,8 +161,10 @@ zone_kmem_kvaspace += totsize; z->zkva = kmem_alloc_pageable(kernel_map, totsize); - if (z->zkva == 0) + if (z->zkva == 0) { + zlist = z->znext; return 0; + } z->zpagemax = totsize / PAGE_SIZE; if (obj == NULL) { To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 12 17:13:57 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 172FD37B400 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 17:13:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gravy.kishka.net (pool-151-197-250-166.phil.east.verizon.net [151.197.250.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED55643E6E for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 17:13:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bleez@bellatlantic.net) Received: from bellatlantic.net (gravy.kishka.net [192.168.1.2]) by gravy.kishka.net (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7D0Drc8000426; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 20:13:54 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from bleez@bellatlantic.net) Message-ID: <3D584F41.2080200@bellatlantic.net> Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 20:13:53 -0400 From: Bryan Liesner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i386; en-US; rv:1.1b) Gecko/20020812 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Josef Karthauser Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: usb MFC? [was: HEADS UP: FreeBSD 4.7 Code Freeze] References: <20020812193712.GA369@genius.tao.org.uk> <20020812215059.N59573-100000@server.arg.sj.co.uk> <20020812213700.GE369@genius.tao.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Josef Karthauser wrote: > > It would help if I had an idea of what works and what's broken in > -stable for usb. I'd welcome reports from usb users. > > Joe I would like to try the uvisor/ucom stuff just comitted, but don't have a clue how to use it... Can you point me in the right direction? -- ========================================================== = Bryan D. Liesner LeezSoft Communications, Inc. = = A subsidiary of LeezSoft Inc. = = bleez@bellatlantic.net Home of the Gipper = ========================================================== To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 12 17:19: 3 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C6E537B400; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 17:18:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from CRWdog.demon.co.uk (p69-199.acedsl.com [66.114.69.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F06343E72; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 17:18:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from spadger@best.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by CRWdog.demon.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55400D7; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 20:18:42 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren?= Schmidt , Thomas Quinot Subject: CAM-ATAPI status? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_915219238P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 20:18:42 -0400 From: Andy Sparrow Message-Id: <20020813001842.55400D7@CRWdog.demon.co.uk> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --==_Exmh_915219238P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, What's the status of the CAM/ATAPI integration? Is anyone thinking of = working on it? When last mentioned, it was mooted that some work needed to be done to = tidy things up. Since then, it's gone very quiet - specifically, I don't = seem to recall seeing any specifics about what needed to be cleaned up. Some time later (what it is now, 6 months?), it's not in the tree, and I = suspect that the happy ATAPI/CAM users are either applying patches = locally to keep using this useful functionality, or bemoaning the fact = that FreeBSD doesn't let them use cdrecord with ATAPI CD-Rs.... Whilst I appreciate the need for coding standards and good-quality code, = (and indeed this is a large part of my personal reasons for choosing = this OS), it seems to me that this has kind of slipped through the = cracks. I've been using the CAM/ATAPI patches on -STABLE for some time now, and = it Just Works - I've burned quite a lot of CD-R's and CD-RW's with my = internal laptop drive and the latest 'cdrecord' from ports, and neither = this nor anything else on the machine appears to suffer unduly. What I'd *really* like to see is for the CAM/ATAPI stuff to go into 4.7 = - it seems to me that people choose the OS for stability, performance = and, let's not forget, *features*, what you can actually /do/ with the = machine. Regards, AS --==_Exmh_915219238P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQE9WFBiPHh895bDXeQRAuISAKC9IfvsXAWVb/ysJrAbuRooGui03ACgiS9r cDRoKTOUmcGueXJ9d50Mm18= =4PL9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_915219238P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 12 17:19:29 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD55C37B400 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 17:19:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from genius.tao.org.uk (genius.tao.org.uk [212.135.162.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33E4543E4A for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 17:19:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from joe@genius.tao.org.uk) Received: by genius.tao.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 100) id 62F2147D; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 01:19:23 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 01:19:23 +0100 From: Josef Karthauser To: Bryan Liesner Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: usb MFC? [was: HEADS UP: FreeBSD 4.7 Code Freeze] Message-ID: <20020813001923.GA1209@genius.tao.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Josef Karthauser , Bryan Liesner , stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20020812193712.GA369@genius.tao.org.uk> <20020812215059.N59573-100000@server.arg.sj.co.uk> <20020812213700.GE369@genius.tao.org.uk> <3D584F41.2080200@bellatlantic.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D584F41.2080200@bellatlantic.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 08:13:53PM -0400, Bryan Liesner wrote: > Josef Karthauser wrote: >=20 > > > >It would help if I had an idea of what works and what's broken in > >-stable for usb. I'd welcome reports from usb users. > > > >Joe >=20 > I would like to try the uvisor/ucom stuff just comitted, but don't have= =20 > a clue how to use it... Can you point me in the right direction? >=20 I'm not sure that it works properly in all circumstances. It's mostly there so that the people who are developing palm sync software have it available. I'd welcome talking to anyone who's interested in making sure that the usb ports work with it. To use it, 'kldload uvisor' and make sure that you've got a ucom device node in /dev. Joe --=20 "As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain; and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality." - Albert Einstein, 1921 --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAj1YUIoACgkQXVIcjOaxUBZIrwCgvBHzuk+71+wN/VxX7e5Q9eAW v8UAniVJbtTrgR6stHEBhGslCsZ2V4Mo =AF3S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 12 17:27:58 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 882ED37B400 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 17:27:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rootlabs.com (root.org [67.118.192.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 703F443E42 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 17:27:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@rootlabs.com) Received: (qmail 33636 invoked by uid 1000); 13 Aug 2002 00:27:51 -0000 Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 17:27:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Nate Lawson To: Andy Sparrow Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG, =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren?= Schmidt , Thomas Quinot Subject: Re: CAM-ATAPI status? In-Reply-To: <20020813001842.55400D7@CRWdog.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Andy Sparrow wrote: > Some time later (what it is now, 6 months?), it's not in the tree, and I > suspect that the happy ATAPI/CAM users are either applying patches > locally to keep using this useful functionality, or bemoaning the fact > that FreeBSD doesn't let them use cdrecord with ATAPI CD-Rs.... You'll be happy to tell them sys/dev/ata/atapi-cam.c: Revision 1.1 Fri Aug 9 20:51:53 2002 UTC (3 days, 3 hours ago) by sos Branch: MAIN Add the ability to use ATAPI devices via CAM. The CAM<>ATAPI layer was submitted by "Thomas Quinot " changes form the version on the net by me (formatting, ability to be used alone without the ATAPI native device driver, proper speed reporting...) See /sys/conf/NOTES for usage. Submitted by: Thomas Quinot To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 12 18:20:26 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCF9937B406; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 18:20:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (rwcrmhc51.attbi.com [204.127.198.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77F4043E6A; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 18:20:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from InterJet.elischer.org ([12.232.206.8]) by rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020813012011.PBRD19356.rwcrmhc51.attbi.com@InterJet.elischer.org>; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 01:20:11 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA13971; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 18:13:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 18:13:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: Andy Sparrow Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG, =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren?= Schmidt , Thomas Quinot Subject: Re: CAM-ATAPI status? In-Reply-To: <20020813001842.55400D7@CRWdog.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG As I mentionned recently.. I think having it in the tree far outweighs having it NOT in the tree. THe first time this was brought up over a year ago it was said that the patches were not quite correct. It was also said they would be corrected "soon" or something.. Sonn has come an gone... if anyone can get me -current patches to do this I'll commit them now and they can be cleaned up later. that'll at least get them started on the path to 4.7... julian On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Andy Sparrow wrote: > > Hi, > > What's the status of the CAM/ATAPI integration? Is anyone thinking of > working on it? > > When last mentioned, it was mooted that some work needed to be done to > tidy things up. Since then, it's gone very quiet - specifically, I don't > seem to recall seeing any specifics about what needed to be cleaned up. > > Some time later (what it is now, 6 months?), it's not in the tree, and I > suspect that the happy ATAPI/CAM users are either applying patches > locally to keep using this useful functionality, or bemoaning the fact > that FreeBSD doesn't let them use cdrecord with ATAPI CD-Rs.... > > Whilst I appreciate the need for coding standards and good-quality code, > (and indeed this is a large part of my personal reasons for choosing > this OS), it seems to me that this has kind of slipped through the > cracks. > > I've been using the CAM/ATAPI patches on -STABLE for some time now, and > it Just Works - I've burned quite a lot of CD-R's and CD-RW's with my > internal laptop drive and the latest 'cdrecord' from ports, and neither > this nor anything else on the machine appears to suffer unduly. > > What I'd *really* like to see is for the CAM/ATAPI stuff to go into 4.7 > - it seems to me that people choose the OS for stability, performance > and, let's not forget, *features*, what you can actually /do/ with the > machine. > > Regards, > > AS > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 12 18:20:43 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A4137B409; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 18:20:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (rwcrmhc51.attbi.com [204.127.198.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E84443E6E; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 18:20:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from InterJet.elischer.org ([12.232.206.8]) by rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020813012020.PBYL19356.rwcrmhc51.attbi.com@InterJet.elischer.org>; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 01:20:20 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA13979; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 18:16:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 18:16:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: Nate Lawson Cc: Andy Sparrow , stable@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG, =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren?= Schmidt , Thomas Quinot Subject: Re: CAM-ATAPI status? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG YIPEEEEE!!! I missed this message... On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Nate Lawson wrote: > On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Andy Sparrow wrote: > > Some time later (what it is now, 6 months?), it's not in the tree, and I > > suspect that the happy ATAPI/CAM users are either applying patches > > locally to keep using this useful functionality, or bemoaning the fact > > that FreeBSD doesn't let them use cdrecord with ATAPI CD-Rs.... > > You'll be happy to tell them sys/dev/ata/atapi-cam.c: > > Revision 1.1 > Fri Aug 9 20:51:53 2002 UTC (3 days, 3 hours ago) by sos > Branch: MAIN > > Add the ability to use ATAPI devices via CAM. > > The CAM<>ATAPI layer was submitted by "Thomas Quinot > " > changes form the version on the net by me (formatting, ability to be used > alone without the ATAPI native device driver, proper speed reporting...) > > See /sys/conf/NOTES for usage. > > Submitted by: Thomas Quinot > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 12 18:37:59 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CD6737B405; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 18:37:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from CRWdog.demon.co.uk (p69-199.acedsl.com [66.114.69.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B942643E65; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 18:37:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from spadger@best.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by CRWdog.demon.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A250121; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 21:37:50 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Nate Lawson Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG, =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren?= Schmidt , Thomas Quinot Subject: Re: CAM-ATAPI status? In-Reply-To: Message from Nate Lawson of "Mon, 12 Aug 2002 17:27:51 PDT." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_920303954P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 21:37:50 -0400 From: Andy Sparrow Message-Id: <20020813013750.8A250121@CRWdog.demon.co.uk> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --==_Exmh_920303954P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > You'll be happy to tell them sys/dev/ata/atapi-cam.c: > = > Revision 1.1 = > Fri Aug 9 20:51:53 2002 UTC (3 days, 3 hours ago) by sos > Branch: MAIN Well, golly... And with improvements too! In good time for an MFC for 4.7! Awesome, no, = outstanding! Thanks to all concerned, I really am very happy to be wrong! :-) Regards, AS --==_Exmh_920303954P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQE9WGLuPHh895bDXeQRArWsAJ4xIwW15vruBolTScbOy7SzQU24cwCfbw9J rdVyXvXgoXDdlGv7RykYBto= =uoGA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_920303954P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 12 18:40:13 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21EF937B40C for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 18:39:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gravy.kishka.net (pool-151-197-250-166.phil.east.verizon.net [151.197.250.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67E8C43E65 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 18:39:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bleez@bellatlantic.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gravy.kishka.net (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7D1dvAW000338; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 21:39:57 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from bleez@bellatlantic.net) Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 21:39:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Bryan Liesner X-X-Sender: root@gravy.kishka.net To: Josef Karthauser Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: usb MFC? [was: HEADS UP: FreeBSD 4.7 Code Freeze] In-Reply-To: <20020813005100.GA796@genius.tao.org.uk> Message-ID: <20020812212846.P331-100000@gravy.kishka.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Josef Karthauser wrote: > > Am I correct to assume that ports like jpilot will use ucomN as a > > "serial port" and communicate with the visor over usb? > > > > That's supposed to be the idea, but I don't know if it works yet on > FreeBSD. > > On my M505 the ucom appears when the hot sync button is pressed. I've > not tested it yet, but that's how it's supposed to work. > > Joe No, it doesn't work yet. I was playing with it yesterday. The ucom did appear, but I was having trouble with pilot/jpilot and "device not configured" errors. I tried mknod ucom0 138 128 and mknod ucom0 138 0 to no avail... I thought I was missing the point, that's why I asked tonight. For what it's worth though, the MFC of the ufm driver works fine. -- ========================================================== = Bryan D. Liesner LeezSoft Communications, Inc. = = A subsidiary of LeezSoft Inc. = = bleez@bellatlantic.net Home of the Gipper = ========================================================== To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 12 18:56:30 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C84337B400; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 18:56:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ion.gank.org (ion.gank.org [198.78.66.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E738843E6E; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 18:56:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from craig@meoqu.gank.org) Received: from aldaris2.auir.gank.org (dsl081-113-221.dfw1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.113.221]) by ion.gank.org (GankMail) with ESMTP id 6E00B2C83A; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 20:56:02 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: usb MFC? [was: HEADS UP: FreeBSD 4.7 Code Freeze] From: Craig Boston To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <3D584F41.2080200@bellatlantic.net> References: <20020812193712.GA369@genius.tao.org.uk> <20020812215059.N59573-100000@server.arg.sj.co.uk> <20020812213700.GE369@genius.tao.org.uk> <3D584F41.2080200@bellatlantic.net> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 12 Aug 2002 20:56:32 -0500 Message-Id: <1029203798.701.2.camel@aldaris2.auir.gank.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG CC: -current since that's what I'm using, but keeping -stable as this was just MFC'd. On Mon, 2002-08-12 at 19:13, Bryan Liesner wrote: > > I would like to try the uvisor/ucom stuff just comitted, but don't have > a clue how to use it... Can you point me in the right direction? Has anyone managed to get ucom working with umodem? I have a USRobotics that works okay with umodem for dialing out, but I'd like to be able to dial in and get a shell (and getty isn't too happy with /dev/umodem0 it seems). So far all my attempts to get ucom to attach to it have been futile. Is this even possible? ucom(4) suggests it is, but the configuration examples seem to be using NetBSD syntax. Thanks, Craig To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 12 19:56:59 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E61AC37B400; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 19:56:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arutam.inch.com (ns.inch.com [216.223.192.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF3B43E4A; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 19:56:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from spork@inch.com) Received: from inch.com (inch.com [216.223.192.20]) by arutam.inch.com (8.12.2/8.12.2/UTIL-INCH-3.0.6) with ESMTP id g7D2utwa029311; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 22:56:55 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 22:56:55 -0400 (EDT) From: Charles Sprickman To: "Jan L. Peterson" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Subject: Re: before 4.7 code freeze In-Reply-To: <20020812185336.5B62BAAC45@peterson.ath.cx> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG And kern/40003 too! As I've stated before, I'm more than happy to provide any info/accounts needed to fix this little bug in the ata code. Alternately, anyone know how to keep everything up to date but still use an older version of the ata stuff? Thanks, Charles -- Charles Sprickman spork@inch.com On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Jan L. Peterson wrote: > Can someone look at conf/38559 before the 4.7 freeze? > > -jan- > -- > Jan L. Peterson > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 1: 5: 0 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48DE437B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 01:04:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thought.holo.org (w120.z064002057.sjc-ca.dsl.cnc.net [64.2.57.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B45DD43E70 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 01:04:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bwb@holo.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thought.holo.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7D8536k046958; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 01:05:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bwb@holo.org) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 01:05:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Brian Buchanan To: Ian Dowse Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Please apply kern/36605 for 4.7 In-Reply-To: <200208130027.aa97334@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> Message-ID: <20020813010219.X46903-100000@thought.holo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Ian Dowse wrote: > Thanks for the reminder. Just looking at the patch, it seems that > in the first chunk, the code can be further simplified by unconditionally > using zlist as the `next' pointer. You're quite correct. Sometimes it's easy to miss the elegant solution when trying to produce a small diff. Thanks for finally getting this into the tree. Brian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 2:36: 8 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD66E37B400; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 02:36:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from genius.tao.org.uk (genius.tao.org.uk [212.135.162.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A228D43E70; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 02:36:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from joe@genius.tao.org.uk) Received: by genius.tao.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 100) id E7A9648A; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:35:59 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:35:59 +0100 From: Josef Karthauser To: Craig Boston Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: usb MFC? [was: HEADS UP: FreeBSD 4.7 Code Freeze] Message-ID: <20020813093559.GA865@genius.tao.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Josef Karthauser , Craig Boston , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <20020812193712.GA369@genius.tao.org.uk> <20020812215059.N59573-100000@server.arg.sj.co.uk> <20020812213700.GE369@genius.tao.org.uk> <3D584F41.2080200@bellatlantic.net> <1029203798.701.2.camel@aldaris2.auir.gank.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1029203798.701.2.camel@aldaris2.auir.gank.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 08:56:32PM -0500, Craig Boston wrote: > CC: -current since that's what I'm using, but keeping -stable as this > was just MFC'd.=20 >=20 > On Mon, 2002-08-12 at 19:13, Bryan Liesner wrote:=20 > >=20 > > I would like to try the uvisor/ucom stuff just comitted, but don't have= =20 > > a clue how to use it... Can you point me in the right direction? > Has anyone managed to get ucom working with umodem? I have a USRobotics > that works okay with umodem for dialing out, but I'd like to be able to > dial in and get a shell (and getty isn't too happy with /dev/umodem0 it > seems). So far all my attempts to get ucom to attach to it have been > futile.=20 >=20 > Is this even possible? ucom(4) suggests it is, but the configuration > examples seem to be using NetBSD syntax.=20 >=20 In NetBSD umodem is a ucom device, but it's entirely separate in FreeBSD. The man page in -current is incorrect. Joe --=20 "As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain; and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality." - Albert Einstein, 1921 --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAj1Y0v4ACgkQXVIcjOaxUBa9AwCg1XrVgyGaCtACnSfCm22J5vvK P14An1QDLqYoo60siEuSLRycdN4mEnbm =faNe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 6:49:14 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2F9C37B400; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 06:49:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl (smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl [194.109.127.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC0343E42; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 06:49:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from danny-bgtrk@dannysplace.net) Received: from s340-isdn1458.dial.xs4all.nl (s340-isdn1458.dial.xs4all.nl [194.109.185.178]) by smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g7DDn3x9088538; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 15:49:04 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Bug in Zoo? Or is it in ls or ffs? From: Danny Carroll To: questions@freebsd.org Cc: stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.4.99 Date: 13 Aug 2002 15:43:00 +0200 Message-Id: <1029246182.1919.47.camel@moby.dannysplace.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I was testing amavis and mcafee virus scan with the eicar test file (e.exe). Basically I was sending different archives to my email machine. I created a zoo file and look at the results. As you can see the size is not taken up in disk space so I suspect the bug is in ls. DU, DF and the left hand column of LS looks OK. This is on 4.6-STABLE as of about 1 week ago. -D [03:33pm danny@guard:~/eicar]$ls -asl total 46 1 drwxr-xr-x 2 danny danny 512 Aug 13 15:33 . 1 drwxr-xr-x 9 danny danny 512 Aug 13 15:30 .. 1 -rw-r--r-- 1 danny danny 69 Aug 13 15:31 e.exe 1 -rw-r--r-- 1 danny danny 121 Aug 13 15:32 e.lhz 1 -rw-r--r-- 1 danny danny 198 Aug 13 15:32 e.tgz [03:34pm danny@guard:~/eicar]$zoo -add e.zoo e.exe Zoo: e.exe -- ( 0%) added [03:34pm danny@guard:~/eicar]$ls -asl total 45 1 drwxr-xr-x 2 danny danny 512 Aug 13 15:34 . 1 drwxr-xr-x 9 danny danny 512 Aug 13 15:30 .. 1 -rw-r--r-- 1 danny danny 69 Aug 13 15:31 e.exe 1 -rw-r--r-- 1 danny danny 121 Aug 13 15:32 e.lhz 1 -rw-r--r-- 1 danny danny 198 Aug 13 15:32 e.tgz 40 -rw-r--r-- 1 danny danny 4294967352 Aug 13 15:31 e.zoo [03:34pm danny@guard:~/eicar]$df Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad0s1a 1016303 88846 846153 10% / /dev/ad0s1h 9355771 1894838 6712472 22% /usr /dev/ad0s1f 1016303 123188 811811 13% /usr/home /dev/ad0s1g 5081581 211351 4463704 5% /usr/local /dev/ad0s1e 2032623 18800 1851214 1% /var procfs 4 4 0 100% /proc [03:36pm danny@guard:~/eicar]$rm e.zoo [03:36pm danny@guard:~/eicar]$df Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad0s1a 1016303 88846 846153 10% / /dev/ad0s1h 9355771 1894838 6712472 22% /usr /dev/ad0s1f 1016303 123148 811851 13% /usr/home /dev/ad0s1g 5081581 211351 4463704 5% /usr/local /dev/ad0s1e 2032623 18800 1851214 1% /var procfs 4 4 0 100% /proc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 6:56:40 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA74C37B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 06:56:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zpfe.com (dev06.eqp.zpfe.com [209.46.51.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 03AB943E6A for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 06:56:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from stevep-hv@zpfe.com) Received: (qmail 40213 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2002 13:56:27 -0000 Received: from dev13.eqp.zpfe.com (HELO PUFFY.zpfe.com) (209.46.51.29) by dev06.eqp.zpfe.com with SMTP; 13 Aug 2002 13:56:27 -0000 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020813084802.037d9498@magpie.zpfe.com> X-Sender: (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 08:56:18 -0500 To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Steve Peterson Subject: Need instructions: build kernel on one machine; install on another Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi -- I'm looking for a pointer to instructions on how to take a kernel built on one machine and install it on another. I checked the handbook and the FAQ to no avail, and did some searching of the mailing list that came up empty. I've built & installed kernels using "make buildkernel ; make installkernel", so I'm not a total newbie to kernel building. If the answer is to go and look at the "installkernel" target in the makefile, I can handle that, but wanted to check with the list to see if there's anything I should be paying attention to. I'd be happy to take whatever I get in terms of instructions and write it up as a FAQ entry. S To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 6:59: 8 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A99A737B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 06:59:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kiln.isn.net (kiln.isn.net [198.167.161.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D762843E72 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 06:59:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mburke@isn.net) Received: from pinky.isn.net (mburke@pinky.isn.net [198.167.161.253]) by kiln.isn.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g7DDx59O001893 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:59:05 -0300 Subject: Re: Bug in Zoo? Or is it in ls or ffs? From: Michael Burke To: stable@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.2 Date: 13 Aug 2002 10:59:06 -0300 Message-Id: <1029247146.822.5.camel@pinky> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 10:43, Danny Carroll wrote: > As you can see the size is not taken up in disk space so I suspect the > bug is in ls. DU, DF and the left hand column of LS looks OK. > > --output-- Looks like you're getting a sparse file -- a large file that actually takes up little space. It's created by a program seeking beyond the end of the file but not writing anything (I may be off a bit, but this is how I understand it). The reported size of the file is large, but it doesn't take up that much space, which is why df suggests that it's not significant. Although I've never used zoo, it's probably a bug there. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 7: 3: 6 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1AB737B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 07:03:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.ing.nl (mail1.ing.nl [145.221.93.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7382A43E65 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 07:02:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Danny.Carroll@mail.ing.nl) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: Bug in Zoo? Or is it in ls or ffs? Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:02:26 +0200 Message-ID: <6C506EA550443D44A061432F1E92EA4C6C5433@ing.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Bug in Zoo? Or is it in ls or ffs? Importance: normal Thread-Index: AcJC0aQiWNuc8lvCQLyfZJSeLBqdNgAAFUbg From: To: , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Aug 2002 14:02:27.0363 (UTC) FILETIME=[0E7FFF30:01C242D2] Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Is this not a bug in ls or ffs as well then? Regardless of what Zoo does, should not the OS remain sane? -D -----Original Message----- From: Michael Burke [mailto:mburke@isn.net] Sent: dinsdag 13 augustus 2002 15:59 To: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Bug in Zoo? Or is it in ls or ffs? On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 10:43, Danny Carroll wrote: > As you can see the size is not taken up in disk space so I suspect the > bug is in ls. DU, DF and the left hand column of LS looks OK. > > --output-- Looks like you're getting a sparse file -- a large file that actually takes up little space. It's created by a program seeking beyond the end of the file but not writing anything (I may be off a bit, but this is how I understand it). The reported size of the file is large, but it doesn't take up that much space, which is why df suggests that it's not significant. Although I've never used zoo, it's probably a bug there. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -----------------------------------------------------------------=0A= ATTENTION:=0A= The information in this electronic mail message is private and=0A= confidential, and only intended for the addressee. Should you=0A= receive this message by mistake, you are hereby notified that=0A= any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or use of this=0A= message is strictly prohibited. Please inform the sender by=0A= reply transmission and delete the message without copying or=0A= opening it.=0A= =0A= Messages and attachments are scanned for all viruses known.=0A= If this message contains password-protected attachments, the=0A= files have NOT been scanned for viruses by the ING mail domain.=0A= Always scan attachments before opening them.=0A= ----------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 7: 5:14 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC42A37B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 07:05:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93A1543E42 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 07:05:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ryan@elvis.mu.org) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1079) id 72F12AE162; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 07:05:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 07:05:11 -0700 From: Ryan Dooley To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: isp(4) question Message-ID: <20020813140511.GA47278@elvis.mu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, Would anyone know if the isp(4) driver support path failover? Cheers, Ryan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 7: 9:23 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8607F37B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 07:09:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bunrab.catwhisker.org (adsl-63-193-123-122.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.193.123.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88D6143E3B for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 07:09:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from bunrab.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bunrab.catwhisker.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7DE9Gmr005483; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 07:09:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david@bunrab.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by bunrab.catwhisker.org (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g7DE9GmN005482; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 07:09:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 07:09:16 -0700 (PDT) From: David Wolfskill Message-Id: <200208131409.g7DE9GmN005482@bunrab.catwhisker.org> To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, stevep-hv@zpfe.com Subject: Re: Need instructions: build kernel on one machine; install on another In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020813084802.037d9498@magpie.zpfe.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 08:56:18 -0500 >From: Steve Peterson >Hi -- I'm looking for a pointer to instructions on how to take a kernel >built on one machine and install it on another. I checked the handbook and >the FAQ to no avail, and did some searching of the mailing list that came >up empty. I've built & installed kernels using "make buildkernel ; make >installkernel", so I'm not a total newbie to kernel building. For machines where the NFS-mounting is accptable, what I have done is: * On the build machine * Update the machine per UPDATING * once rebooted, and verified that behavior is as expected: * cd /usr/src * foreach k ( list of kernel configs for target machines here ... ) make buildkernel KERNCONF=$k end Once that's done, for each target machine * ensure that / & /usr are mounted read-write * mount ${buildmachine}:/usr/src /usr/src # can be read-only * mount ${buildmachine}:/usr/obj /usr/obj # can be read-only * cd /usr/src * make installkernel KERNCONF=target_kernel_config * make installworld * mergemaster * reboot Note that I've gotten away with avoiding the single-user reboot that is recommended for immediately following the "make installkernel". YMMV. Cheers, david (links to my resume at http://www.catwhisker.org/~david) -- David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org To paraphrase David Hilbert, there can be no conflicts between Microsoft and the discipline of systems administration, since they have nothing in common. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 7:10:32 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E11BF37B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 07:10:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (ei.xs4all.nl [213.84.67.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF1B743E42 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 07:10:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd-q@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (BOFH@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ei.bzerk.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7DEBE0e002202; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:11:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from stable@ei.bzerk.org) Received: (from stable@localhost) by ei.bzerk.org (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g7DEBEDm002201; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:11:14 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:11:14 +0200 From: Ruben de Groot To: Danny.Carroll@mail.ing.nl Cc: mburke@isn.net, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bug in Zoo? Or is it in ls or ffs? Message-ID: <20020813141114.GA2147@ei.bzerk.org> References: <6C506EA550443D44A061432F1E92EA4C6C5433@ing.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6C506EA550443D44A061432F1E92EA4C6C5433@ing.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 04:02:26PM +0200, Danny.Carroll@mail.ing.nl typed: > Is this not a bug in ls or ffs as well then? > Regardless of what Zoo does, should not the OS remain sane? The OS is fine. Sparse files have been a feature of Unix filesystems for a long time. zoo creates one accidentally. That's a bug. > > -D > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Burke [mailto:mburke@isn.net] > Sent: dinsdag 13 augustus 2002 15:59 > To: stable@FreeBSD.org > Subject: Re: Bug in Zoo? Or is it in ls or ffs? > > > On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 10:43, Danny Carroll wrote: > > As you can see the size is not taken up in disk space so I suspect the > > bug is in ls. DU, DF and the left hand column of LS looks OK. > > > > --output-- > > Looks like you're getting a sparse file -- a large file that actually > takes up little space. It's created by a program seeking beyond the end > of the file but not writing anything (I may be off a bit, but this is > how I understand it). The reported size of the file is large, but it > doesn't take up that much space, which is why df suggests that it's not > significant. > > Although I've never used zoo, it's probably a bug there. > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > ATTENTION: > The information in this electronic mail message is private and > confidential, and only intended for the addressee. Should you > receive this message by mistake, you are hereby notified that > any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or use of this > message is strictly prohibited. Please inform the sender by > reply transmission and delete the message without copying or > opening it. > > Messages and attachments are scanned for all viruses known. > If this message contains password-protected attachments, the > files have NOT been scanned for viruses by the ING mail domain. > Always scan attachments before opening them. > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 7:11:18 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB5D437B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 07:11:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ramstind.gtf.ol.no (ramstind.gtf.ol.no [128.39.174.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB29843E6A for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 07:11:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from trond@ramstind.gtf.ol.no) Received: from localhost (trond@localhost) by ramstind.gtf.ol.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA85727; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:10:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from trond@ramstind.gtf.ol.no) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:10:54 +0200 (CEST) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= To: Steve Peterson Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Need instructions: build kernel on one machine; install on another In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020813084802.037d9498@magpie.zpfe.com> Message-ID: <20020813160914.T85135-100000@ramstind.gtf.ol.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 13 Aug 2002 08:56-0500, Steve Peterson wrote: > Hi -- I'm looking for a pointer to instructions on how to take a kernel > built on one machine and install it on another. I checked the handbook and > the FAQ to no avail, and did some searching of the mailing list that came > up empty. I've built & installed kernels using "make buildkernel ; make > installkernel", so I'm not a total newbie to kernel building. > > If the answer is to go and look at the "installkernel" target in the > makefile, I can handle that, but wanted to check with the list to see if > there's anything I should be paying attention to. One suggestion: Mount /usr/src from machine A on machine B as NFS. Then do a make installkernel. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Trond Endrestøl | trond@ramstind.gtf.ol.no Patron of The Art of Computer Programming| FreeBSD 3.5-S & Pine 4.44 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 7:20: 6 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36AA637B401 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 07:19:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail19b.rapidsite.net (mail19b.rapidsite.net [161.58.134.134]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8129B43E65 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 07:19:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rob@pythonemproject.com) Received: from www.pythonemproject.com (198.104.176.109) by mail19b.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.63s) with SMTP id 0103743843 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:27:57 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D59155E.BD90960D@pythonemproject.com> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 07:19:10 -0700 From: Rob X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "stable@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: CAM-ATAPI status? References: <20020813013750.8A250121@CRWdog.demon.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Loop-Detect: 1 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Andy Sparrow wrote: > > > You'll be happy to tell them sys/dev/ata/atapi-cam.c: > > > > Revision 1.1 > > Fri Aug 9 20:51:53 2002 UTC (3 days, 3 hours ago) by sos > > Branch: MAIN > > Well, golly... > > And with improvements too! In good time for an MFC for 4.7! Awesome, no, > outstanding! > > Thanks to all concerned, I really am very happy to be wrong! :-) > > Regards, > > AS > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature I am very impressed. This one of the main reasons I always liked OpenBSD, atapi-scsi support. Good work guys! Rob (who works on a laptop so can't change to a SCSI drive) -- ----------------------------- The Numeric Python EM Project www.pythonemproject.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 7:20:57 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7406337B401 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 07:20:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sequel.rsm.ru (sequel.rsm.ru [217.23.86.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A68E243E3B for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 07:20:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from aga@rsm.ru) Received: from rsm.ru (up.rsm.ru [217.23.86.16]) by sequel.rsm.ru (8.11.1/8.11.1/RSM-3.1-s-av) with ESMTP id g7DEKic39423 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 18:20:44 +0400 (MSD) Message-ID: <3D5915BC.30609@rsm.ru> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 18:20:44 +0400 From: Dmitry Agafonov Organization: Radioservice Mobile, Saratov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530 X-Accept-Language: ru, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Need instructions: build kernel on one machine; install on another References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020813084802.037d9498@magpie.zpfe.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: OK Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Steve Peterson wrote: > Hi -- I'm looking for a pointer to instructions on how to take a kernel > built on one machine and install it on another. I checked the handbook > and the FAQ to no avail, and did some searching of the mailing list that > came up empty. I've built & installed kernels using "make buildkernel ; > make installkernel", so I'm not a total newbie to kernel building. > > If the answer is to go and look at the "installkernel" target in the > makefile, I can handle that, but wanted to check with the list to see if > there's anything I should be paying attention to. > > I'd be happy to take whatever I get in terms of instructions and write > it up as a FAQ entry. > > S > We have compiled kernels (make buildkernel KERNCONF=LALALA) on one machine, and then after nfs-mounting /usr/src and /usr/obj to target machine - make installkernel KERNCONF=LALALA This works fine and is very good for poor-cpu/ram machines :) The question still remains - can one build a number of kernels and then install them? This will save some time on updating a number of machines: 3 steps (cvsup'ing and world and kernel(s) building) may be fully automated. Is anybody thinking of UPGRADE.sh script :) -- Dmitry Agafonov To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 7:23:10 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53BDA37B401 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 07:23:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.kerna.ie (ns.kerna.ie [194.106.143.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C002143E72 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 07:23:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from james@kerna.ie) Received: from ram.kerna.ie (ram.kerna.ie [194.106.143.99]) by mail.kerna.ie (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA24927 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 15:23:06 +0100 (BST) Received: from bender.kerna.ie (bender.kerna.ie [192.168.42.133]) by ram.kerna.ie (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA08096 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 15:23:06 +0100 Received: (from james@localhost) by bender.kerna.ie (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g7DEN3C67360 for stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 15:23:03 +0100 (IST) (envelope-from james@kerna.ie) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 15:23:03 +0100 From: James Raftery To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bug in Zoo? Or is it in ls or ffs? Message-ID: <20020813142303.GD54000@bender.kerna.ie> References: <6C506EA550443D44A061432F1E92EA4C6C5433@ing.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6C506EA550443D44A061432F1E92EA4C6C5433@ing.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 04:02:26PM +0200, Danny.Carroll@mail.ing.nl wrote: > Is this not a bug in ls or ffs as well then? > Regardless of what Zoo does, should not the OS remain sane? ``A file is sparse if it contains blocks of zeros whose existence is recorded, but that have no space allocated on disk.'' -- GNU tar man page. Be grateful sparse files exist, otherwise you would have a real 4294967352 byte file to deal with! ATB, james To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 7:30:48 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7F7C37B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 07:30:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.ing.nl (mail1.ing.nl [145.221.93.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC91B43E42 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 07:30:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Danny.Carroll@mail.ing.nl) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: Bug in Zoo? Or is it in ls or ffs? Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:25:49 +0200 Message-ID: <6C506EA550443D44A061432F1E92EA4C6C5437@ing.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Bug in Zoo? Or is it in ls or ffs? Importance: normal Thread-Index: AcJC1QBSIFUVwN+sRju8bFKLBhx/8wAAD2IQ From: To: , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Aug 2002 14:25:50.0150 (UTC) FILETIME=[52A04E60:01C242D5] Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Well, you learn something new every day. I'll track down the Zoo people and send an email. -D -----Original Message----- From: James Raftery [mailto:james@kerna.ie] Sent: dinsdag 13 augustus 2002 16:23 To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bug in Zoo? Or is it in ls or ffs? On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 04:02:26PM +0200, Danny.Carroll@mail.ing.nl = wrote: > Is this not a bug in ls or ffs as well then? > Regardless of what Zoo does, should not the OS remain sane? ``A file is sparse if it contains blocks of zeros whose existence=20 is recorded, but that have no space allocated on disk.'' -- GNU tar man page. Be grateful sparse files exist, otherwise you would have a=20 real 4294967352 byte file to deal with! ATB, james To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -----------------------------------------------------------------=0A= ATTENTION:=0A= The information in this electronic mail message is private and=0A= confidential, and only intended for the addressee. Should you=0A= receive this message by mistake, you are hereby notified that=0A= any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or use of this=0A= message is strictly prohibited. Please inform the sender by=0A= reply transmission and delete the message without copying or=0A= opening it.=0A= =0A= Messages and attachments are scanned for all viruses known.=0A= If this message contains password-protected attachments, the=0A= files have NOT been scanned for viruses by the ING mail domain.=0A= Always scan attachments before opening them.=0A= ----------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 7:35:16 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E559437B401 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 07:35:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blanca.unet.brandeis.edu (blanca.unet.brandeis.edu [129.64.99.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A2E043E3B for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 07:35:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from xuchen@brandeis.edu) Received: from emmgr.rose2.brandeis.edu (emmgr.rose2.brandeis.edu [129.64.33.49]) by blanca.unet.brandeis.edu (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7DEZAFt005504; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:35:10 -0400 Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:35:14 -0400 Subject: Re: Need instructions: build kernel on one machine; install on another Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v482) Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG To: Dmitry Agafonov From: Chen Xu In-Reply-To: <3D5915BC.30609@rsm.ru> Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.482) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tuesday, August 13, 2002, at 10:20 AM, Dmitry Agafonov wrote: > > We have compiled kernels (make buildkernel KERNCONF=LALALA) on one machine, > and then after nfs-mounting /usr/src and /usr/obj to target machine - > make installkernel KERNCONF=LALALA > This works fine and is very good for poor-cpu/ram machines :) > > The question still remains - can one build a number of kernels and > then install them? This will save some time on updating a number > of machines: 3 steps (cvsup'ing and world and kernel(s) building) > may be fully automated. I don't see why you cann't do it for many machines. One can just make buildkernel KERNCONF=LALALA ... make buildkernel KERNCONF=ZAZAZA then nfs mount to each machine to installkernel. Only problem is that you have to do `installkernel KERNCONF=$cornel_config` on each target boxes, which makes fully auto a problem. \ Chen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 7:51:17 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C4F037B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 07:51:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from adsl-64-161-24-9.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net (adsl-64-161-24-9.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net [64.161.24.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A3B9C43E6E for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 07:51:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dab@brinegar-computing.com) Received: (qmail 24633 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2002 14:51:10 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO garden.corte.roble) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 Aug 2002 14:51:10 -0000 Received: (from dab@localhost) by garden.corte.roble (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g7DEpTd0000285; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 07:51:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dab) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 07:51:28 -0700 From: David Brinegar To: Steve Peterson Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Need instructions: build kernel on one machine; install on another Message-ID: <20020813145128.GA240@garden.brinegar-computing.com> References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020813084802.037d9498@magpie.zpfe.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020813084802.037d9498@magpie.zpfe.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG See also: http://www.freebsddiary.org/makeworld-2boxes.php On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 08:56:18AM -0500, Steve Peterson wrote: > Hi -- I'm looking for a pointer to instructions on how to take a kernel > built on one machine and install it on another. I checked the handbook and > the FAQ to no avail, and did some searching of the mailing list that came > up empty. I've built & installed kernels using "make buildkernel ; make > installkernel", so I'm not a total newbie to kernel building. > > If the answer is to go and look at the "installkernel" target in the > makefile, I can handle that, but wanted to check with the list to see if > there's anything I should be paying attention to. > > I'd be happy to take whatever I get in terms of instructions and write it > up as a FAQ entry. > > S > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 8: 0: 5 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B14D37B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 08:00:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alba.unet.brandeis.edu (alba.unet.brandeis.edu [129.64.99.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C686C43E70 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 08:00:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from xuchen@brandeis.edu) Received: from emmgr.rose2.brandeis.edu (emmgr.rose2.brandeis.edu [129.64.33.49]) by alba.unet.brandeis.edu (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g7DExwcV005053; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:59:58 -0400 Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 11:00:04 -0400 Subject: Re: Need instructions: build kernel on one machine; install on another Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v482) Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG To: Michael Sierchio From: Chen Xu In-Reply-To: <3D5919BB.4070405@tenebras.com> Message-Id: <59880068-AECD-11D6-92E2-000502D7A780@brandeis.edu> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.482) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tuesday, August 13, 2002, at 10:37 AM, Michael Sierchio wrote: > > Beware the contents of /etc/make.conf if you have machines with > different processors (Athlon versus Pentium versus i686) Are you saying the kernel compiled at one type of cpu will not work on the other type of cpu EVEN the config file it right? A generic kernel shipped with CD was certainly compiled with only one type of cpu? I might miss something here. > Sometimes useful to mount /usr/obj, too. Yes, I agree. I do that all the time :-). Chen > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 8: 0:39 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01BF537B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 08:00:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gull.mail.pas.earthlink.net (gull.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7891843E77 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 08:00:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mvh@ix.netcom.com) Received: from lsanca1-ar6-4-62-204-203.lsanca1.elnk.dsl.genuity.net ([4.62.204.203] helo=netcom1.netcom.com) by gull.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 17ed9m-0000Z8-00; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 08:00:26 -0700 Received: by netcom1.netcom.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 38C2D13105; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 08:00:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Mike Harding To: xuchen@brandeis.edu Cc: aga@rsm.ru, stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: (message from Chen Xu on Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:35:14 -0400) Subject: Re: Need instructions: build kernel on one machine; install on another References: Message-Id: <20020813150024.38C2D13105@netcom1.netcom.com> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 08:00:24 -0700 (PDT) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I can validate that this works - one way you can automate this is to put the KERNCONF definition in /etc/make.conf. We used this to bulk update a farm of SMP and uniprocessor systems, the SMP kernel was different for us. One thing that can bite you is _other_ things in /etc/make.conf - like if you use NO_SENDMAIL=yes in the base system - if /etc/make.conf doesn't have the same options in the install systems the install will fail. Likewise for kerberos. I don't know what can be done about CPU variants unless you have a relatively homogenous setup. What worked best for us was to keep /etc/make.conf as short as possible, even if all of the systems ended up getting the games directory installed... - Mike H. Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:35:14 -0400 Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Chen Xu Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,DOUBLE_CAPSWORD version=2.31 X-Spam-Level: On Tuesday, August 13, 2002, at 10:20 AM, Dmitry Agafonov wrote: > > We have compiled kernels (make buildkernel KERNCONF=LALALA) on one machine, > and then after nfs-mounting /usr/src and /usr/obj to target machine - > make installkernel KERNCONF=LALALA > This works fine and is very good for poor-cpu/ram machines :) > > The question still remains - can one build a number of kernels and > then install them? This will save some time on updating a number > of machines: 3 steps (cvsup'ing and world and kernel(s) building) > may be fully automated. I don't see why you cann't do it for many machines. One can just make buildkernel KERNCONF=LALALA ... make buildkernel KERNCONF=ZAZAZA then nfs mount to each machine to installkernel. Only problem is that you have to do `installkernel KERNCONF=$cornel_config` on each target boxes, which makes fully auto a problem. \ Chen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 8: 6: 8 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2828837B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 08:06:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from topperwein.dyndns.org (acs-24-154-28-203.zoominternet.net [24.154.28.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 368E043E81 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 08:06:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from behanna@zbzoom.net) Received: from topperwein (topperwein [192.168.168.10]) by topperwein.dyndns.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7DF62QC088463 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 11:06:02 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from behanna@zbzoom.net) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 11:05:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris BeHanna Reply-To: Chris BeHanna To: FreeBSD-Stable Subject: Re: Need instructions: build kernel on one machine; install on another In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20020813110326.W44669-100000@topperwein.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Chen Xu wrote: > On Tuesday, August 13, 2002, at 10:20 AM, Dmitry Agafonov wrote: > > > > We have compiled kernels (make buildkernel KERNCONF=LALALA) on one machine, > > and then after nfs-mounting /usr/src and /usr/obj to target machine - > > make installkernel KERNCONF=LALALA > > This works fine and is very good for poor-cpu/ram machines :) > > > > > > The question still remains - can one build a number of kernels and > > then install them? This will save some time on updating a number > > of machines: 3 steps (cvsup'ing and world and kernel(s) building) > > may be fully automated. > > I don't see why you cann't do it for many machines. One can just > make buildkernel KERNCONF=LALALA > ... > make buildkernel KERNCONF=ZAZAZA > > then nfs mount to each machine to installkernel. Only problem is > that you have to do `installkernel KERNCONF=$cornel_config` > on each target boxes, which makes fully auto a problem. \ Why? for i in mach1 mach2 mach3 mach4 do ssh $i /root/upgrade.sh done And upgrade.sh contains something like: mount -t nfs buildmachine:/usr/src /usr/src cd /usr/src make installkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL KODIR=/modules umount /usr/src Of course, it needs a little polish, but you get the idea. -- Chris BeHanna http://www.pennasoft.com Principal Consultant PennaSoft Corporation chris@pennasoft.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 8:25:16 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D4437B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 08:25:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from frmug.org (frmug-gw.frmug.org [193.56.58.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C3F43E3B for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 08:25:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from olive@oban.frmug.org) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by frmug.org (8.11.3/8.11.3/frmug-2.7/nospam) with UUCP id g7DFP4o49336 for stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 17:25:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from olive@oban.frmug.org) Received: by weirdos.oban.frmug.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id D1A038C27; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 17:24:37 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 17:24:37 +0200 From: Olivier Tharan To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Need instructions: build kernel on one machine; install on another Message-ID: <20020813152437.GO1788@weirdos.oban.frmug.org> Mail-Followup-To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020813084802.037d9498@magpie.zpfe.com> <3D5915BC.30609@rsm.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D5915BC.30609@rsm.ru> X-Attribution: Olive Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Dmitry Agafonov (20020813 18:20): > The question still remains - can one build a number of kernels and > then install them? This will save some time on updating a number > of machines: 3 steps (cvsup'ing and world and kernel(s) building) > may be fully automated. You can put several kernel names in the KERNCONF variable in make.conf: KERNCONF= SUZIE WEIRDOS HOBBES The only trick which I learned some days ago is you have to put the name of the local kernel first in the list (here SUZIE will be the kernel I install on the build machine with 'make installkernel'). On the other machines, you only need to put the machine's kernel name in the KERNCONF variable in make.conf. olive -- C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot. C++ makes it harder, but when you do, it blows away your whole leg. -- Bjarne Stroustrup on C++ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 8:32:28 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3B7B37B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 08:32:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gatekeeper.oremut01.us.wh.verio.net (gatekeeper.oremut01.us.wh.verio.net [198.65.168.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F02843E70 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 08:32:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fclift@verio.net) Received: from mx.dmz.orem.verio.net (mx.dmz.orem.verio.net [10.1.1.10]) by gatekeeper.oremut01.us.wh.verio.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A24C73BF2A2 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 09:32:20 -0600 (MDT) Received: from vespa.dmz.orem.verio.net (vespa.dmz.orem.verio.net [10.1.1.59]) by mx.dmz.orem.verio.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7DFWJ329126 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 09:32:19 -0600 (MDT) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 09:32:54 -0600 (MDT) From: Fred Clift X-X-Sender: To: Subject: Can someone MFC the patch in bin/37717? In-Reply-To: <200208122251.g7CMpCY43206@puma.icir.org> Message-ID: <20020813093054.H14285-100000@vespa.dmz.orem.verio.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG As the subject says, can someone MFC the patch in bin/37717? It is not terribly critical, but it's a simple little fix that I'm concerned aobut only for vanity-type reasons :). That, and it's one less local patch I have to worry about applying... Fred -- Fred Clift - fclift@verio.net -- Remember: If brute force doesn't work, you're just not using enough. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 8:37:47 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DBD537B401 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 08:37:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from host185.dolanmedia.com (host185.dolanmedia.com [209.98.197.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6BE1643E70 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 08:37:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from greg.panula@dolaninformation.com) Received: (qmail 22730 invoked by uid 0); 13 Aug 2002 15:37:42 -0000 Received: from greg.panula@dolaninformation.com by proxy with qmail-scanner-0.96 (. Clean. Processed in 0.475879 secs); 13 Aug 2002 15:37:42 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: greg.panula@dolaninformation.com via proxy X-Qmail-Scanner-Rcpt-To: xuchen@brandeis.edu,stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Qmail-Scanner: 0.96 (No viruses found. Processed in 0.475879 secs) Received: from unknown (HELO mail.dolanmedia.com) (10.1.1.23) by host185.dolanmedia.com with SMTP; 13 Aug 2002 15:37:41 -0000 Received: from dolaninformation.com (10.1.1.135) by mail.dolanmedia.com (Worldmail 1.3.167); 13 Aug 2002 10:37:41 -0500 Message-ID: <3D5927C5.47BFB8A3@dolaninformation.com> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:37:41 -0500 From: Greg Panula Reply-To: greg.panula@dolaninformation.com Organization: Dolan Information Center Inc X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chen Xu Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Need instructions: build kernel on one machine; install on another References: <59880068-AECD-11D6-92E2-000502D7A780@brandeis.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Chen Xu wrote: > > On Tuesday, August 13, 2002, at 10:37 AM, Michael Sierchio wrote: > > > > Beware the contents of /etc/make.conf if you have machines with > > different processors (Athlon versus Pentium versus i686) > > Are you saying the kernel compiled at one type of cpu will not > work on the other type of cpu EVEN the config file it right? > A generic kernel shipped with CD was certainly compiled > with only one type of cpu? I might miss something here. I use an Althon CPU in my "world-builder" box and I haven't run into any problems with worlds&kernels built on that box for Intel based machines(P90-PIII450). The worldbuilder has an empty /etc/make.conf. I think Michael was just warning about CPU specific stuff in /etc/make.conf on the machine doing the actual building. Take a look at /etc/defaults/make.conf for various CPU specific variables that can be set. greg To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 9:10:28 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCE0E37B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 09:10:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tesla.distributel.net (nat.MTL.distributel.NET [66.38.181.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3747443E3B for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 09:10:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmilekic@unixdaemons.com) Received: (from bmilekic@localhost) by tesla.distributel.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g7DG9vS01100; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 12:09:57 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from bmilekic@unixdaemons.com) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 12:09:57 -0400 From: Bosko Milekic To: Fred Clift Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Can someone MFC the patch in bin/37717? Message-ID: <20020813120957.A1079@unixdaemons.com> References: <200208122251.g7CMpCY43206@puma.icir.org> <20020813093054.H14285-100000@vespa.dmz.orem.verio.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20020813093054.H14285-100000@vespa.dmz.orem.verio.net>; from fclift@verio.net on Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 09:32:54AM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 09:32:54AM -0600, Fred Clift wrote: > > As the subject says, can someone MFC the patch in bin/37717? It is not > terribly critical, but it's a simple little fix that I'm concerned aobut > only for vanity-type reasons :). That, and it's one less local patch I > have to worry about applying... Done. Thank you. > Fred > > -- > Fred Clift - fclift@verio.net -- Remember: If brute > force doesn't work, you're just not using enough. -- Bosko Milekic * bmilekic@unixdaemons.com * bmilekic@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 9:16:43 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A23637B401 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 09:16:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from topperwein.dyndns.org (acs-24-154-28-203.zoominternet.net [24.154.28.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80A9C43E81 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 09:16:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from behanna@zbzoom.net) Received: from topperwein (topperwein [192.168.168.10]) by topperwein.dyndns.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7DGFbQC088700 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 12:15:37 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from behanna@zbzoom.net) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 12:15:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris BeHanna Reply-To: Chris BeHanna To: FreeBSD-Stable Subject: Re: Need instructions: build kernel on one machine; install on another In-Reply-To: <3D5927C5.47BFB8A3@dolaninformation.com> Message-ID: <20020813121209.K44669-100000@topperwein.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Greg Panula wrote: > Chen Xu wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, August 13, 2002, at 10:37 AM, Michael Sierchio wrote: > > > > > > Beware the contents of /etc/make.conf if you have machines with > > > different processors (Athlon versus Pentium versus i686) > > > > Are you saying the kernel compiled at one type of cpu will not > > work on the other type of cpu EVEN the config file it right? > > A generic kernel shipped with CD was certainly compiled > > with only one type of cpu? I might miss something here. > > I use an Althon CPU in my "world-builder" box and I haven't run into any > problems with worlds&kernels built on that box for Intel based > machines(P90-PIII450). The worldbuilder has an empty /etc/make.conf. > > I think Michael was just warning about CPU specific stuff in > /etc/make.conf on the machine doing the actual building. Take a look at > /etc/defaults/make.conf for various CPU specific variables that can be > set. Right. IF you're going to set a CPUTYPE in /etc/make.conf, it has to be set to the lowest common denominator of all of the machines that are going to be installing from the build machine. Of course, if one has the disk space, one can do a few cross-builds using the MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX environment variable, then install from the appropriate cross-build. That's not terribly sensible until the base compiler is GCC-3.1, which has support for some of the newer CPUs. Example: env MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj.p3 make buildworld CPUTYPE=p3 -- Chris BeHanna http://www.pennasoft.com Principal Consultant PennaSoft Corporation chris@pennasoft.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 9:53:44 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EEBC37B400; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 09:53:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (whale.sunbay.crimea.ua [212.110.138.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D568C43E42; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 09:53:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ru@whale.sunbay.crimea.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (8.11.6/8.11.2) id g7DGr4p23277; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 19:53:04 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 19:53:04 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Gareth Hopkins Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org, "Jacques A. Vidrine" Subject: Re: Problems with make buildworld from 4.3 RELEASE to Current Stable Message-ID: <20020813165304.GA22683@sunbay.com> References: <20020603163151.U59096-100000@gabba.so.cpt1.za.uu.net> <20020603162831.GC84912@sunbay.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020603162831.GC84912@sunbay.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 07:28:31PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 05:14:04PM +0200, Gareth Hopkins wrote: > > Howdie, > >=20 > > I am trying to upgrade a couple of boxes from 4.3 RELEASE to the > > current stable and am getting the following error (same error on two > > different boxes sofar) > >=20 > > cc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/kerberos5/lib/libasn1/../../../crypto/heimdal/in= clude -I/usr/src/kerberos5/lib/libasn1/../../../crypto/heimdal/lib/asn1 -I= /usr/src/kerberos5 /lib/libasn1/../../../crypto/heimdal/lib/roken -I/usr/sr= c/kerberos5/lib/libasn1/.. /../include -I/usr/obj/usr/src/kerberos5/lib/l= ibasn1 -Wall -I/usr/src/kerberos5/li b/libasn1/../../include -I/usr/src/ker= beros5/lib/libasn1/../../include -DHAVE_CONFI G_H -DINET6 /usr/src/kerberos= 5/lib/libasn1/../../../crypto/heimdal/lib/asn1/gen.c /usr/src/kerberos5/lib= /libasn1/../../../crypto/heimdal/lib/asn1/gen_copy.c /usr/src /kerberos5/li= b/libasn1/../../../crypto/heimdal/lib/asn1/gen_decode.c /usr/src/kerbe ros5= /lib/libasn1/../../../crypto/heimdal/lib/asn1/gen_encode.c /usr/src/kerbero= s5/l ib/libasn1/../../../crypto/heimdal/lib/asn1/gen_free.c /usr/src/kerber= os5/lib/libas n1/../../../crypto/heimdal/lib/asn1/gen_glue.c /usr/src/kerbe= ros5/lib/libasn1/../.. /../crypto/heimdal/lib/asn1/gen_length.c /usr/src/k= erberos5/lib/libasn1/../../../cr ypto/heimdal/lib/asn1/hash.c /usr/src/kerb= eros5/lib/libasn1/../../../crypto/heimdal /lib/roken/emalloc.c lex.o /usr/s= rc/kerberos5/lib/libasn1/../../../crypto/heimdal/l ib/asn1/main.c parse.o /= usr/src/kerberos5/lib/libasn1/../../../crypto/heimdal/lib/a sn1/symbol.c /u= sr/src/kerberos5/lib/libasn1/../../../crypto/heimdal/lib/roken/getar g.c /u= sr/src/kerberos5/lib/libasn1/../../../crypto/heimdal/lib/roken/warnerr.c pr= in t_version.o /usr/src/kerberos5/lib/libasn1/../../../crypto/heimdal/lib/r= oken/get_wi ndow_size.c /usr/src/kerberos5/lib/libasn1/../../../crypto/heim= dal/lib/roken/strupr .c -o asn1_compile > > /tmp/cc1kbFDn.o: In function `main': /tmp/cc1kbFDn.o(.text+0x47): undef= ined reference to `setprogname' > > /tmp/ccHkcD1A.o: In function `arg_printusage': > > /tmp/ccHkcD1A.o(.text+0x68e): undefined reference to `getprogname' > > /tmp/ccq5EvQS.o: In function `warnerr': > > /tmp/ccq5EvQS.o(.text+0x17): undefined reference to `getprogname' > > print_version.o: In function `print_version': > > print_version.o(.text+0x19): undefined reference to `getprogname' > > *** Error code 1 > >=20 > > Stop in /usr/src/kerberos5/lib/libasn1. > > *** Error code 1 > >=20 > > Stop in /usr/src. > > *** Error code 1 > >=20 > > I have already gone through the make cleandir twice in /usr/src aswell > > as rm -rf /usr/obj/* and then cvsupping again. Still getting the same > > error. I have the following included in the /etc/make.conf > >=20 > > MAKE_KERBEROS5=3D yes > > ENABLE_SUID_K5SU=3D yes > >=20 > > Anything else that I need to do? > >=20 > Please try this patch: >=20 [Patch elided.] The patch has been committed to 5.0-CURRENT. MFC in three days. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9WTlwUkv4P6juNwoRAitpAJ45v0mx02BQlUCY2JCqbLS8IAX36gCdHj7A qttLifnhs/Ny988efkNQ/PY= =0LEm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 10:41: 5 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DECD37B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:41:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.lambertfam.org (www.lambertfam.org [216.223.196.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D7443E77 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:41:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lambert@lambertfam.org) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.inch.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66CE9351A0 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:37:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from laptop.lambertfam.org (unknown [10.1.0.2]) by mail.lambertfam.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 951C93518F for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:37:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: by laptop.lambertfam.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 57AC228B09; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:40:50 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:40:50 -0400 From: Scott Lambert To: FreeBSD-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Need instructions: build kernel on one machine; install on another Message-ID: <20020813174050.GA5380@laptop.lambertfam.org> Reply-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD-stable@freebsd.org References: <3D5915BC.30609@rsm.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 10:35:14AM -0400, Chen Xu wrote: > > On Tuesday, August 13, 2002, at 10:20 AM, Dmitry Agafonov wrote: > > > >We have compiled kernels (make buildkernel KERNCONF=LALALA) on one machine, > > and then after nfs-mounting /usr/src and /usr/obj to target machine - > >make installkernel KERNCONF=LALALA > >This works fine and is very good for poor-cpu/ram machines :) > > > >The question still remains - can one build a number of kernels and > >then install them? This will save some time on updating a number > >of machines: 3 steps (cvsup'ing and world and kernel(s) building) > >may be fully automated. > > I don't see why you cann't do it for many machines. One can just > make buildkernel KERNCONF=LALALA > ... > make buildkernel KERNCONF=ZAZAZA > > then nfs mount to each machine to installkernel. Only problem is > that you have to do `installkernel KERNCONF=$cornel_config` > on each target boxes, which makes fully auto a problem. \ From my buildeverything script: THIS_HOSTS_KERNEL=`uname -a | sed 's|.*/sys/||' | awk '{print $1}'` make installkernel KERNCONF=$THIS_HOSTS_KERNEL There is probably a less expensive way to gather the installed kernel's config file name, but I just threw this together and ran it. -- Scott Lambert KC5MLE Unix SysAdmin lambert@lambertfam.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 11: 9:32 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 012FC37B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 11:09:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp1.wanadoo.nl (smtp1.wanadoo.nl [194.134.35.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85BCC43E6A for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 11:09:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from ams-gw.sohara.org (rot2-p2554.dial.wanadoo.nl [194.134.139.250]) by smtp1.wanadoo.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 350115B2EF; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 20:09:26 +0200 (MEST) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 20:09:24 +0200 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: Olivier Tharan Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Need instructions: build kernel on one machine; install on another Message-Id: <20020813200924.4e7cce32.steve@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <20020813152437.GO1788@weirdos.oban.frmug.org> References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020813084802.037d9498@magpie.zpfe.com> <3D5915BC.30609@rsm.ru> <20020813152437.GO1788@weirdos.oban.frmug.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.1 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.6) X-Face: %]+HVL}K`P8>+8ZcY-WGHP6j@&mxMo9JH6_WdgIgUGH)JX/usO0%jy7T~IVgqjumD^OBqX,Kv^-GM6mlw(fI^$"QRKyZ$?xx/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 13 Aug 2002 17:24:37 +0200 Olivier Tharan wrote: OT> * Dmitry Agafonov (20020813 18:20): OT> > The question still remains - can one build a number of kernels and OT> > then install them? This will save some time on updating a number OT> > of machines: 3 steps (cvsup'ing and world and kernel(s) building) OT> > may be fully automated. OT> OT> You can put several kernel names in the KERNCONF variable in OT> make.conf: OT> OT> KERNCONF= SUZIE WEIRDOS HOBBES OT> OT> The only trick which I learned some days ago is you have to put the OT> name of the local kernel first in the list (here SUZIE will be the You can also set INSTALLKERNEL= WIERDOS to push SUZIE out. -- C:>WIN | Directable Mirrors The computer obeys and wins. |A Better Way To Focus The Sun You lose and Bill collects. | licenses available - see: | http://www.sohara.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 13: 1:59 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 620D037B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:01:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from frostbytes.com (dsl092-065-149.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.65.149]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D19D543E9E for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:00:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jimf@frostbytes.com) Received: from [10.1.6.20] (cmb2-nip1.atg.com [63.116.205.150]) by fortress.frostbytes.com (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id LAA30358 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 11:09:45 -0400 Subject: Third attempt: Solution to rl0 and xl0 "watchdog timeout" problem From: Jim Frost To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6) Date: 13 Aug 2002 11:07:03 -0400 Message-Id: <1029251226.6150.36.camel@icehouse> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've tried to post a message regarding this a couple of times before and it got bit-bucketed for some reason. Since this problem ate up a lot of time and is pretty darn nonintuitive to figure out, I'm trying yet again. If you've seen a previous version of this message please drop me a line and let me know so I don't keep trying; I don't know if I'm supposed to get copies of the messages I send. I recently purchased a new PC to use as a server. This PC was purchased from a local vendor and had an MSI motherboard. Unfortunately I can't find the documentation on which motherboard model it is, but if someone needs to know I can probably dig it up. The PC has a 1.6GHz P4 installed and 512MB memory. Networking was originally managed by a DLink DFE-530TX+ ethernet card hooked into a 10Mbps hub (yea, yea, but it still works so why mess with it). Installation went smoothly aside from having to individually check about a thousand packages to install everything on the disk. That installer is awful. When I fired it up, however, I got "rl0: watchdog timeout" errors on the console and, of course, no network traffic got through. The man page suggests that this is a bad cable or connection however the hub and card were both showing connection lights. To be certain I tried a couple of other "known good" wires. Same thing. Despite the fact that the ethercard is listed as being officially supported I figured I probably had one with incompatible firmware or something, so I went out and got a 3com 3c905 card. Swapped cards, reconfigured, rebooted and ... "xl0: watchdog timeout". That pretty much left the problem to BSD, since the system had passed burn-in on WinXP. I thought that perhaps the PC vendor had set up the PCI settings for WinXP and maybe that was not compatible with BSD, so I investigated. I didn't see anything out of the ordinary, but while I was there I noticed that slots 1 and 3 and slots 2 and 6 shared interrupts on this motherboard. (I have no idea how common that is.) Guessing that this might be the problem I moved the ethercard into slot 4 and ... voila, it worked. I would love to know why this failed, but regardless I at least wanted this solution to get out there so the next guy who's tearing his hair out over this problem can find the solution on google or in the archives. Cheers, jim frost jimf@frostbytes.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 13: 2:31 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0A4237B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:02:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from frostbytes.com (dsl092-065-149.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.65.149]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB0E043E86 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:01:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jimf@frostbytes.com) Received: from snowball.frostbytes.com (snowball.frostbytes.com [192.168.1.193]) by fortress.frostbytes.com (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id MAA14625 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 12:36:45 -0400 Subject: FreeBSD 4.6 rl0 and xl0 watchdog timeout problems (and solution) From: Jim Frost To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6) Date: 12 Aug 2002 12:38:17 -0400 Message-Id: <1029170297.9472.214.camel@snowball.frostbytes.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [Apologies if you have already seen this, but it didn't seem to go through for some reason.] I'm posting this mostly so that someone who runs into the same problem can perhaps find the message. Short version: Try a different slot. For some reason BSD doesn't see interrupts in slots that share PCI interrupts. Long version: I recently bought a new PC to use as a server to replace an aging Cobalt Qube2. The Qube was a great little box ... or it was until the last security update which broke something in the kernel such that the box hangs regularly. Sun's "support", even their paid "support", has a couple of workarounds that reduce the frequency but they are clearly not interested in fixing it, and the whole reason I bought the box was so that I could manage it with point-and-click; I don't really feel like tracking down sources and building my own kernels anymore. Anyway, one of the reasons for using the Qube2 is that it's not Windows and it's not Intel so almost nobody's attack scripts will work even if the machine has a hole I haven't patched yet on a service that the firewall and machine configuration exposes. Not wanting to spend the money on a newer Cobalt box given the crappy support I got with the one I have, I decided to give in and run an Intel box again. No way was I going to run Windows on an exposed box, and I'd prefer not to run Red Hat (as I do on my laptop) because it's the first target of the script kiddies. BSD seemed like a good solution and one which I'm fairly familiar with from days past. Besides, my pro-BSD buddies raved about how fast and stable it is. So I bought some fairly generic PC from a local supplier: an MSI board of some sort with a hunk o' RAM and disk, a 1.6GHz P4, and a DLink DFE-530TX+ ethercard. Nothing special these days, but not junk either, and way more capability than I really need on my home server (hey, that Qube2 was working just fine until Sun broke it). The local PC company couldn't guarantee the system would run FreeBSD but they burned it in with WinXP so at least I knew the parts worked, and the net tells me that all this stuff should work on BSD. Besides, at this point the UNIXen have pretty much got the PC hardware figured out, right? I ordered up a FreeBSD 4.6 subscription from bsdmall and got to installing it. First impression: That installer sucks ass. I mean, sucks like the stuff we used to get from Sun in the 3.x days. Sucks worse than SysVR3 did. Sucks sucks sucks. Never mind that the X11 configuration hung and I had to give up on that and rerun the install and skip it (Red Hat has got that /nailed/ at this point), the thing that really pisses me off is that I just wanted it to install everything on the disk. What the hell, the disk space is cheap and I am not sure what I'm going to want. So far as I can tell there's no way to do that, so I had to check off like a thousand packages one at a time. That SUCKS. Primitive, irritating, and gawdawful easy to fix. Wassup with that? Not an auspicious start, but I still managed to get the whole install done in about half the time of any Windows product I've installed in the last seven or eight years, so it's not /that/ big a deal. It just looks way lame relative to any Linux release we've seen since like 1997. Anyway, I fired it up and got "rl0: watchdog timeout" errors. Shit. I've seen those before from waaaay back when SunOS was my favorite system, and it meant that the ethernet cable fell out. The man page for the rl driver says that that's probably what it is. Problem is, the cabling checks out: it was showing good connection lights on both ends. Just to be sure I pulled known-good cabling from other stuff. Still no go. I thought maybe the thing was incorrectly sensing the media; I still run 10baseT because it's here and it works and I don't see why I should spend money on a new hub. ifconfig said it autoconfigured to 10baseT/UTP but just to be sure I forced the config. Same problem. Ok, I've used the various UNIXen enough to know that they're often sensitive to card firmware versions; maybe the 530TX+ has new firmware that screwed it up. So I picked up a 3c905 card and threw it in. Same problem. That didn't leave much. At this point I figured it's an interrupt problem of some sort and started looking at the PCI configuration in the BIOS. I remember something about NT et al needing something or other disabled to work on new motherboards and figure that maybe the PC vendor set that up, but I don't see anything out of the ordinary. But while I was in there I noticed that four slots share two interrupt configurations: Slots 1 and 3 share one, and slots 2 and 6 share another. Hmm. The ethercard is in slot 3, one of the shared slots. On a hunch I move the ethercard to slot 4 and reboot. Voila, works like a champ. I'd be interested in an explanation if someone has one, and if nobody does then I'd be willing to help track down some details to fix it so some other poor schmuck doesn't waste a lot of time tracking it down. So far this has been way more effort than it should have been and I haven't even gotten to configuring the services I need. The only reason I didn't just dump it in favor of RH7.3 was that my discs are at work right now. But, now that it's working, I'm going to proceed and hope for the best. Hell, if nothing else it boots a lot faster than Linux. jim frost jimf@frostbytes.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 13: 2:43 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E352537B401 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:02:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from frostbytes.com (dsl092-065-149.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.65.149]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B130743E65 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:01:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jimf@frostbytes.com) Received: from snowball.frostbytes.com (snowball.frostbytes.com [192.168.1.193]) by fortress.frostbytes.com (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id RAA01755 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 17:43:18 -0400 Subject: FreeBSD 4.6 rl0 and xl0 watchdog timeout problems (and solution) From: Jim Frost To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6) Date: 11 Aug 2002 17:44:50 -0400 Message-Id: <1029102290.9472.188.camel@snowball.frostbytes.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm posting this mostly so that someone who runs into the same problem can perhaps find the message. Short version: Try a different slot. For some reason BSD doesn't see interrupts in slots that share PCI interrupts. Long version: I recently bought a new PC to use as a server to replace an aging Cobalt Qube2. The Qube was a great little box ... or it was until the last security update which broke something in the kernel such that the box hangs regularly. Sun's "support", even their paid "support", has a couple of workarounds that reduce the frequency but they are clearly not interested in fixing it, and the whole reason I bought the box was so that I could manage it with point-and-click; I don't really feel like tracking down sources and building my own kernels anymore. Anyway, one of the reasons for using the Qube2 is that it's not Windows and it's not Intel so almost nobody's attack scripts will work even if the machine has a hole I haven't patched yet on a service that the firewall and machine configuration exposes. Not wanting to spend the money on a newer Cobalt box given the crappy support I got with the one I have, I decided to give in and run an Intel box again. No way was I going to run Windows on an exposed box, and I'd prefer not to run Red Hat (as I do on my laptop) because it's the first target of the script kiddies. BSD seemed like a good solution and one which I'm fairly familiar with from days past. Besides, my pro-BSD buddies raved about how fast and stable it is. So I bought some fairly generic PC from a local supplier: an MSI board of some sort with a hunk o' RAM and disk, a 1.6GHz P4, and a DLink DFE-530TX+ ethercard. Nothing special these days, but not junk either, and way more capability than I really need on my home server (hey, that Qube2 was working just fine until Sun broke it). The local PC company couldn't guarantee the system would run FreeBSD but they burned it in with WinXP so at least I knew the parts worked, and the net tells me that all this stuff should work on BSD. Besides, at this point the UNIXen have pretty much got the PC hardware figured out, right? I ordered up a FreeBSD 4.6 subscription from bsdmall and got to installing it. First impression: That installer sucks ass. I mean, sucks like the stuff we used to get from Sun in the 3.x days. Sucks worse than SysVR3 did. Sucks sucks sucks. Never mind that the X11 configuration hung and I had to give up on that and rerun the install and skip it (Red Hat has got that /nailed/ at this point), the thing that really pisses me off is that I just wanted it to install everything on the disk. What the hell, the disk space is cheap and I am not sure what I'm going to want. So far as I can tell there's no way to do that, so I had to check off like a thousand packages one at a time. That SUCKS. Primitive, irritating, and gawdawful easy to fix. Wassup with that? Not an auspicious start, but I still managed to get the whole install done in about half the time of any Windows product I've installed in the last seven or eight years, so it's not /that/ big a deal. It just looks way lame relative to any Linux release we've seen since like 1997. Anyway, I fired it up and got "rl0: watchdog timeout" errors. Shit. I've seen those before from waaaay back when SunOS was my favorite system, and it meant that the ethernet cable fell out. The man page for the rl driver says that that's probably what it is. Problem is, the cabling checks out: it was showing good connection lights on both ends. Just to be sure I pulled known-good cabling from other stuff. Still no go. I thought maybe the thing was incorrectly sensing the media; I still run 10baseT because it's here and it works and I don't see why I should spend money on a new hub. ifconfig said it autoconfigured to 10baseT/UTP but just to be sure I forced the config. Same problem. Ok, I've used the various UNIXen enough to know that they're often sensitive to card firmware versions; maybe the 530TX+ has new firmware that screwed it up. So I picked up a 3c905 card and threw it in. Same problem. That didn't leave much. At this point I figured it's an interrupt problem of some sort and started looking at the PCI configuration in the BIOS. I remember something about NT et al needing something or other disabled to work on new motherboards and figure that maybe the PC vendor set that up, but I don't see anything out of the ordinary. But while I was in there I noticed that four slots share two interrupt configurations: Slots 1 and 3 share one, and slots 2 and 6 share another. Hmm. The ethercard is in slot 3, one of the shared slots. On a hunch I move the ethercard to slot 4 and reboot. Voila, works like a champ. I'd be interested in an explanation if someone has one, and if nobody does then I'd be willing to help track down some details to fix it so some other poor schmuck doesn't waste a lot of time tracking it down. So far this has been way more effort than it should have been and I haven't even gotten to configuring the services I need. The only reason I didn't just dump it in favor of RH7.3 was that my discs are at work right now. But, now that it's working, I'm going to proceed and hope for the best. Hell, if nothing else it boots a lot faster than Linux. jim frost jimf@frostbytes.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 13: 7:50 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D6F737B414 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:07:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from frostbytes.com (dsl092-065-149.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.65.149]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C498643E4A for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:04:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jimf@frostbytes.com) Received: from [10.1.6.20] (cmb2-nip1.atg.com [63.116.205.150]) by frostbytes.com (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id QAA01282 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:04:50 -0400 Subject: Solution to rl0 and xl0 watchdog timeout problem From: Jim Frost To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6) Date: 13 Aug 2002 16:02:09 -0400 Message-Id: <1029268930.6150.97.camel@icehouse> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm sending this message in the hope that it may help someone else who runs into a similar problem. I recently purchased a new PC to use as a server. This PC was purchased from a local vendor and had an MSI motherboard. Unfortunately I can't find the documentation on which motherboard model it is, but if someone needs to know I can probably dig it up. The PC has a 1.6GHz P4 installed and 512MB memory. Networking was originally managed by a DLink DFE-530TX+ ethernet card hooked into a 10Mbps hub (yea, yea, but it still works so why mess with it). Installation went smoothly aside from having to individually check about a thousand packages to install everything on the disk. That installer is awful. When I fired it up, however, I got "rl0: watchdog timeout" errors on the console and, of course, no network traffic got through. The man page suggests that this is a bad cable or connection however the hub and card were both showing connection lights. To be certain I tried a couple of other "known good" wires. Same thing. Despite the fact that the ethercard is listed as being officially supported I figured I probably had one with incompatible firmware or something, so I went out and got a 3com 3c905 card. Swapped cards, reconfigured, rebooted and ... "xl0: watchdog timeout". That pretty much left the problem to BSD, since the system had passed burn-in on WinXP. I thought that perhaps the PC vendor had set up the PCI settings for WinXP and maybe that was not compatible with BSD, so I investigated. I didn't see anything out of the ordinary, but while I was there I noticed that slots 1 and 3 and slots 2 and 6 shared interrupts on this motherboard. (I have no idea how common that is.) Guessing that this might be the problem I moved the ethercard into slot 4 and ... voila, it worked. I would love to know why this failed, but regardless I at least wanted this solution to get out there so the next guy who's tearing his hair out over this problem can find the solution with google or in the archives. Cheers, jim frost jimf@frostbytes.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 13:13:34 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7CB537B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:13:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from frostbytes.com (dsl092-065-149.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.65.149]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 047DC43E3B for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:13:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jimf@frostbytes.com) Received: from [10.1.6.20] (cmb2-nip1.atg.com [63.116.205.150]) by frostbytes.com (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id QAA01347 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:13:30 -0400 Subject: Re: Solution to rl0 and xl0 watchdog timeout problem From: Jim Frost To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1029268930.6150.97.camel@icehouse> References: <1029268930.6150.97.camel@icehouse> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6) Date: 13 Aug 2002 16:10:46 -0400 Message-Id: <1029269450.6150.110.camel@icehouse> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 16:02, Jim Frost wrote: > I'm sending this message in the hope that it may help someone else who > runs into a similar problem. I'm sorry for the duplicate message; I finally figured out that my sendmail was configured such that it was exposing an internal name for the server via HELO and freebsd.org was rejecting it as unresolvable. I fixed that and one of the old messages made it through. I wonder how many other messages were bit-bucketed because of that over the last couple of years? Whoops. jim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 13:28:20 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 417F037B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:28:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tesla.distributel.net (nat.MTL.distributel.NET [66.38.181.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873D043E6A for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:28:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmilekic@unixdaemons.com) Received: (from bmilekic@localhost) by tesla.distributel.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g7DKRgN02961; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:27:42 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from bmilekic@unixdaemons.com) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:27:42 -0400 From: Bosko Milekic To: Jim Frost Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.6 rl0 and xl0 watchdog timeout problems (and solution) Message-ID: <20020813162742.B2869@unixdaemons.com> References: <1029102290.9472.188.camel@snowball.frostbytes.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <1029102290.9472.188.camel@snowball.frostbytes.com>; from jimf@frostbytes.com on Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 05:44:50PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 05:44:50PM -0400, Jim Frost wrote: [...interesting read, some baiting skipped...] > Anyway, I fired it up and got "rl0: watchdog timeout" errors. Shit. > I've seen those before from waaaay back when SunOS was my favorite > system, and it meant that the ethernet cable fell out. The man page for > the rl driver says that that's probably what it is. Problem is, the > cabling checks out: it was showing good connection lights on both ends. > Just to be sure I pulled known-good cabling from other stuff. Still no > go. > > I thought maybe the thing was incorrectly sensing the media; I still run > 10baseT because it's here and it works and I don't see why I should > spend money on a new hub. ifconfig said it autoconfigured to > 10baseT/UTP but just to be sure I forced the config. Same problem. What was sharing the card's IRQ? When you have devices sharing IRQs, it obviously takes longer before the handler gets to run. The watchdog is getting fired off before the handler gets to run. Was the interface working at all? > Ok, I've used the various UNIXen enough to know that they're often > sensitive to card firmware versions; maybe the 530TX+ has new firmware > that screwed it up. So I picked up a 3c905 card and threw it in. Same > problem. > > That didn't leave much. At this point I figured it's an interrupt > problem of some sort and started looking at the PCI configuration in the > BIOS. I remember something about NT et al needing something or other > disabled to work on new motherboards and figure that maybe the PC vendor > set that up, but I don't see anything out of the ordinary. > > But while I was in there I noticed that four slots share two interrupt > configurations: Slots 1 and 3 share one, and slots 2 and 6 share > another. Hmm. The ethercard is in slot 3, one of the shared slots. > > On a hunch I move the ethercard to slot 4 and reboot. Voila, works like > a champ. Sounds good. You know, it's entirely possible that other operating systems silently ignore the watchdog timeouts and you may just think that FreeBSD is the problem because it's telling you that maybe you should think about changing your setup. > I'd be interested in an explanation if someone has one, and if nobody > does then I'd be willing to help track down some details to fix it so > some other poor schmuck doesn't waste a lot of time tracking it down. [...] > jim frost > jimf@frostbytes.com -- Bosko Milekic * bmilekic@unixdaemons.com * bmilekic@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 13:38:36 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6263C37B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:38:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail6.mn.rr.com (fe6.rdc-kc.rr.com [24.94.163.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C76A243E42 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:38:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kivi@mn.rr.com) Received: from babxp ([24.26.181.184]) by mail6.mn.rr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.537.53); Tue, 13 Aug 2002 15:35:42 -0500 Message-ID: <000801c24309$591ffb30$1104a8c0@babxp> From: "KIVI" To: Subject: please join me to ur mailing list Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 15:38:14 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0005_01C242DF.701C2C70" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C242DF.701C2C70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C242DF.701C2C70 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C242DF.701C2C70-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 13:39:30 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8212137B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:39:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from frostbytes.com (dsl092-065-149.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.65.149]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81B4E43E65 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:39:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jimf@frostbytes.com) Received: from [10.1.6.20] (cmb2-nip1.atg.com [63.116.205.150]) by frostbytes.com (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id QAA01703; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:39:15 -0400 Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.6 rl0 and xl0 watchdog timeout problems (and solution) From: Jim Frost To: Bosko Milekic Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20020813162742.B2869@unixdaemons.com> References: <1029102290.9472.188.camel@snowball.frostbytes.com> <20020813162742.B2869@unixdaemons.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6) Date: 13 Aug 2002 16:36:35 -0400 Message-Id: <1029270995.6144.127.camel@icehouse> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 16:27, Bosko Milekic wrote: > > I thought maybe the thing was incorrectly sensing the media; I still run > > 10baseT because it's here and it works and I don't see why I should > > spend money on a new hub. ifconfig said it autoconfigured to > > 10baseT/UTP but just to be sure I forced the config. Same problem. > > What was sharing the card's IRQ? When you have devices sharing IRQs, > it obviously takes longer before the handler gets to run. The > watchdog is getting fired off before the handler gets to run. Was the > interface working at all? I've realized that I did not clearly state the nature of the problem. No other cards exist in the system to share an IRQ with; this card was assigned its own (IRQ12 FWIW). What appears to be special is that the slot that the card in shares a single PCI interrupt assignment with another slot (which was empty). I.e. if I go into the BIOS config it lists a number of things that can be assigned interrupts, all of which are currently set to "auto". The PCI slot assignments are 1/3, 2/6, 4, and 5 (ie only four interrupts can be assigned between six slots). So long as the card is in slot 4 or slot 5 it works; if it's in 1, 2, 3 or 6 it does not. > Sounds good. You know, it's entirely possible that other operating > systems silently ignore the watchdog timeouts and you may just think > that FreeBSD is the problem because it's telling you that maybe you > should think about changing your setup. Could be; certainly that was the case back in the old days with cheap IDE interfaces that didn't deliver interrupts. Personally I don't much care if it's just BSD being more picky, but "watchdog timeout" did not seem to indicate "card is in the wrong PCI slot" to me. jim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 13:52:18 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0252637B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:52:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web21501.mail.yahoo.com (web21501.mail.yahoo.com [66.163.169.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CE28743E70 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:52:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from magic_mac_96@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20020813205216.47311.qmail@web21501.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [80.117.48.93] by web21501.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:52:16 PDT Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:52:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrea Monaldi Subject: Installing on ATI video card laptop To: stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi All, I am trying to install 4.6 release on a Compaq laptop with an ATI Rage Mobility video card. It seems there's no driver at all for the ATI familiy. Is it true? Thanks, Andrea __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs http://www.hotjobs.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 14: 5:30 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 085F637B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 14:05:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from klima.physik.uni-mainz.de (klima.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.180.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F17543E75 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 14:05:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ohartman@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de) Received: from mail.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE (mail.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.180.161]) by klima.physik.uni-mainz.de (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7DL5OVZ000827 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 23:05:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ohartman@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 23:05:23 +0200 (CEST) From: "Hartmann, O." X-X-Sender: ohartman@mail.physik.uni-mainz.de To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Still fxp/nfsd problems after today's recent cvsupdate Message-ID: <20020813221318.U384-100000@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dear Sirs. Within tha last few days I ran several times into problems due to a bug in FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE. The last full cvsupdate has been done yesterday evening, but after a make world, mergemaster and installation of the appropriate kernels, it took several hours when the first problems occured again. Our servers and diskless terminals use all Intel EtherExpress Pro NICs and so they suffered from the bug as mentioned here in the mailing list. Yesterday I could fix the problem by cvsupdating the sources 'back' to 2002.08.07.12.00.00 and recompiling a kernel. Today I'm not able to solve the problem by this 'nasty' trick. I did the last cvsupdate today at 1300 CEST. A make world, mergemaster, make buildkernel worked well and after rebooting all of our servers again they did not show these strange problems of the last days. But now none of our diskless terminals is willing to boot. After loading, booting teh kernel each terminal tries to work its scripst but when mounting the file systems from /etc/fstab they abort. The last message I see is the following: +++ create lastlog . . . Warning: Block size restricts cylinders per group to 25 /tmp/dev.cpio.gz: No such file or directory cpio: Memory exhausted Mounting /etc/fstab filesystems failed, startup aborted We use the latest rc.diskless scripts, so I did not realize a change since the last cvsupdate yesterday and the most recent today. It seems that the kernel on each terminal run out of memory (most terminals have only 64 MB, but others have 128MB) and therefore it can not mount the NFS file systems. I have no glue whats going on nor an idea how to track down the problem. It is courious that it worked yesterday and today not. As mentioned, yesterday it was possible to fix these problems by bulding a kernel with older bug-free sources, but today it seems to be deeper inside of a module? Well, could this have to do something with the bug in the fxp driver mentioned here? Well, if this is a stupid config mistake (but when did essential things change?), please send me an email or a tip, how to track down this problem. Thanks a lot. As attachment, there is the dmesg output of the boot server (NFS boot process). But it is truncated (system is now up for 1 hour!). Strange! Boot server and terminals use polling (but polling disabling does not fix the problem). ---- dmesg 180.54:25 in via fxp0 -- MfG O. Hartmann ohartman@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de ------------------------------------------------------------------ IT-Administration des Institutes fuer Physik der Atmosphaere (IPA) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Johannes Gutenberg Universitaet Mainz Becherweg 21 55099 Mainz Tel: +496131/3924662 (Maschinenraum) Tel: +496131/3924144 (Buero) FAX: +496131/3923532 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 14:37:39 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3BEB37B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 14:37:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from topperwein.dyndns.org (acs-24-154-28-203.zoominternet.net [24.154.28.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC9C543E4A for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 14:37:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from behanna@zbzoom.net) Received: from topperwein (topperwein [192.168.168.10]) by topperwein.dyndns.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7DLbaQC089947 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 17:37:36 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from behanna@zbzoom.net) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 17:37:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris BeHanna Reply-To: Chris BeHanna To: FreeBSD-Stable Subject: Re: Installing on ATI video card laptop In-Reply-To: <20020813205216.47311.qmail@web21501.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20020813173655.Q44669-100000@topperwein.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Andrea Monaldi wrote: > Hi All, > > I am trying to install 4.6 release on a Compaq laptop > with an ATI Rage Mobility video card. > > It seems there's no driver at all for the ATI familiy. > Is it true? No, it's not true. Works great for me on an HP OmniBook 4150B. I'm using XFree86 4.2, FYI. -- Chris BeHanna http://www.pennasoft.com Principal Consultant PennaSoft Corporation chris@pennasoft.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 14:53:44 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0218F37B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 14:53:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from doc.chasma.net (ns2.chasma.net [63.175.99.115]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D58843E77 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 14:53:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fogalt@chasma.net) Received: (qmail 53558 invoked by uid 0); 13 Aug 2002 18:47:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fogalt.corp.chasma.net) (10.0.0.177) by ns2.chasma.net with SMTP; 13 Aug 2002 18:47:24 -0000 Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 14:49:19 -0400 (EDT) From: tom fogal Reply-To: To: Subject: tar.o linking problems Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hey all, just cvsup'ed to the latest stable this morning, from a stable dated a month or so ago. 'make buildworld' dies when trying to build tar: cc -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/local/nfs/src/gnu/usr.bin/tar -I/usr/local/nfs/src/gnu/usr.bin/tar/../../../contrib/tar/lib -I/usr/local/nfs/src/gnu/usr.bin/tar/../../../contrib/tar/src -static -o tar addext.o argmatch.o backupfile.o basename.o dirname.o error.o exclude.o full-write.o getdate.o getline.o getopt.o getopt1.o getstr.o hash.o human.o mktime.o modechange.o prepargs.o print-copyr.o quotearg.o safe-read.o save-cwd.o savedir.o unicodeio.o xgetcwd.o xmalloc.o xstrdup.o xstrtoul.o xstrtoumax.o strtoumax.o buffer.o compare.o create.o delete.o extract.o incremen.o list.o mangle.o misc.o names.o rtapelib.o tar.o update.o tar.o: In function `add_exclude': tar.o(.text+0x177c): multiple definition of `add_exclude' exclude.o(.text+0x1d8): first defined here ... (a bunch of other, similar messages) ... update.o: In function `junk_archive': update.o(.text+0x3e2): undefined reference to `msg' update.o(.text+0x3f2): undefined reference to `msg' update.o(.text+0x4b8): undefined reference to `msg' update.o(.text+0x54d): undefined reference to `msg' update.o(.text+0x93a): more undefined references to `msg' follow if your interested in seeing all of the undefined references and other errors, see: http://www.freebsdhackers.net/fogalt/abridged_script any ideas? thanks in advance, -tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 15: 8:39 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7021E37B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 15:08:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01E6143E42 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 15:08:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from owt.com (owt-207-41-94-232.owt.com [207.41.94.232]) by rutger.owt.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA08697; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 15:08:32 -0700 Message-ID: <3D59835F.3060706@owt.com> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 15:08:31 -0700 From: Kent Stewart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020314 Netscape6/6.2.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us, es-mx MIME-Version: 1.0 To: fogal_t@chasma.net Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: tar.o linking problems References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG tom fogal wrote: > Hey all, > > just cvsup'ed to the latest stable this morning, from a stable > dated a month or so ago. 'make buildworld' dies when trying to > build tar: > > cc -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -DHAVE_CONFIG_H > -I/usr/local/nfs/src/gnu/usr.bin/tar > -I/usr/local/nfs/src/gnu/usr.bin/tar/../../../contrib/tar/lib > -I/usr/local/nfs/src/gnu/usr.bin/tar/../../../contrib/tar/src > -static -o tar addext.o argmatch.o backupfile.o basename.o > dirname.o error.o exclude.o full-write.o getdate.o getline.o > getopt.o getopt1.o getstr.o hash.o human.o mktime.o modechange.o > prepargs.o print-copyr.o quotearg.o safe-read.o save-cwd.o > savedir.o unicodeio.o xgetcwd.o xmalloc.o xstrdup.o xstrtoul.o > xstrtoumax.o strtoumax.o buffer.o compare.o create.o delete.o > extract.o incremen.o list.o mangle.o misc.o names.o rtapelib.o > tar.o update.o tar.o: In function `add_exclude': tar.o(.text+0x177c): > multiple definition of `add_exclude' exclude.o(.text+0x1d8): > first defined here ... (a bunch of other, similar messages) ... update.o: > In function `junk_archive': update.o(.text+0x3e2): undefined > reference to `msg' update.o(.text+0x3f2): undefined reference to > `msg' update.o(.text+0x4b8): undefined reference to `msg' update.o(.text+0x54d): > undefined reference to `msg' update.o(.text+0x93a): more > undefined references to `msg' follow > > if your interested in seeing all of the undefined references and > other errors, see: http://www.freebsdhackers.net/fogalt/abridged_script > > > any ideas? > > thanks in advance, > I cvsuped at 1001 am PDT (1701 GMT) and didn't have any problems. Did you try cvsuping again to see if you grabbed something in the middle of an update? Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 15:56:53 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D0BD37B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 15:56:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hotmail.com (f40.law11.hotmail.com [64.4.17.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4D4E43F2A for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 15:56:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bxdimension6@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 15:56:20 -0700 Received: from 63.204.104.130 by lw11fd.law11.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 22:56:19 GMT X-Originating-IP: [63.204.104.130] From: "dimension 6" To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: suggestion for 4.7 Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 22:56:19 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Aug 2002 22:56:20.0162 (UTC) FILETIME=[A3893A20:01C2431C] Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I really have been suffered from FreeBSD's system hangs on my system (athlon amd). I am new to FreeBSD, but I know some people complaining about same problem as I have on FreeBSD. It stops responding during installation or whatever I try to install something larger than normal. When it happens, the red light stops blinking and can't either login or shut down properly. When I am forced to shut down, I can't do anything, it asks me for sh directory. I really hope that 4.7 won't get stuck during installation of programs, and I also hope that it won't lose setting after being forced to shut down. Thanx for considering. FreeBSD is the best of all OSes if those problem won't occur. _________________________________________________________________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 16:10:24 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8709D37B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:10:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from magnesium.net (toxic.magnesium.net [207.154.84.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B37D143E70 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:10:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from unfurl@dub.net) Received: (qmail 42509 invoked by uid 1001); 13 Aug 2002 23:10:16 -0000 Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:10:16 -0700 From: Bill Swingle To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: problems with Mylex Accelraid 160 and 4.6-RELEASE Message-ID: <20020813231016.GA40126@dub.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD toxic.magnesium.net 4.6-STABLE FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I just installed 4.6-RELEASE from the freebsdmall disc set on a new machine that has 4 18gb seagate drives in a raid 0+1 array on a Mylex Accelraid 160 controller.=20 The install went as expected but now upon reboot it just hangs at the "Mounting root from" line. Here's the last bits of the boot -v output before it hangs: Waiting 15 seconds for SCSI devices to settle (probe45:mly0:1:0:0): MODE SENSE(06). CDB: 1a 0 a 0 14 0 (probe45:mly0:1:0:0): ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:21,0 (probe45:mly0:1:0:0): Logical block address out of range mly0: physical device 0:6 gone mly0: enclosure 6 unit 0 access offline mly0: physical device 0:6 sense data received mly0: sense key 5 asc 24 ascq 00 mly0: info 00000000 csi 00000000 (probe36:mly0:0:6:0): INQUIRY. CDB: 12 1 80 0 ff 0 (probe36:mly0:0:6:0): ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:24,0 (probe36:mly0:0:6:0): Invalid field in CDB Creating DISK da0 pass0 at mly0 bus 0 target 6 lun 0 pass0: Fixed Processor SCSI-2 devices pass0: 135.168MB/s transfers pass1 at mly0 bus 1 target 0 lun 0 pass1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device pass1: Serial Number V* pass1: 135.168MB/s transfers pass0 at mly0 bus 0 target 6 lun 0 pass0: Fixed Processor SCSI-2 devices pass0: 135.168MB/s transfers Mounting root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a * down arrow character Any suggestions? -Bill --=20 -=3D| Bill Swingle - -=3D| Every message PGP signed -=3D| Fingerprint: C1E3 49D1 EFC9 3EE0 EA6E 6414 5200 1C95 8E09 0223 -=3D| "Computers are useless. They can only give you answers" Pablo Picasso= =20 --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9WZHYUgAclY4JAiMRAqCqAJ9zRkPLePCfqrIlATzH3pwrLyXQ/wCfeuLF E/vmgSIHIZxKF1XBHUBNrzM= =z/vy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 16:27:22 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D804237B401 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:27:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from magnesium.net (toxic.magnesium.net [207.154.84.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 223D643E75 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:27:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from unfurl@dub.net) Received: (qmail 43423 invoked by uid 1001); 13 Aug 2002 23:27:17 -0000 Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:27:17 -0700 From: Bill Swingle To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problems with Mylex Accelraid 160 and 4.6-RELEASE Message-ID: <20020813232717.GA43322@dub.net> References: <20020813231016.GA40126@dub.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020813231016.GA40126@dub.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD toxic.magnesium.net 4.6-STABLE FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Never mind. I solved it by disabling the onboard scsi controllers which are not being used. It boots just fine now. -Bill On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 04:10:16PM -0700, Bill Swingle wrote: > I just installed 4.6-RELEASE from the freebsdmall disc set on a new > machine that has 4 18gb seagate drives in a raid 0+1 array on a Mylex > Accelraid 160 controller.=20 >=20 > The install went as expected but now upon reboot it just hangs at the > "Mounting root from" line. Here's the last bits of the boot -v output > before it hangs: >=20 > Waiting 15 seconds for SCSI devices to settle > (probe45:mly0:1:0:0): MODE SENSE(06). CDB: 1a 0 a 0 14 0 > (probe45:mly0:1:0:0): ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:21,0 > (probe45:mly0:1:0:0): Logical block address out of range > mly0: physical device 0:6 gone > mly0: enclosure 6 unit 0 access offline > mly0: physical device 0:6 sense data received > mly0: sense key 5 asc 24 ascq 00 > mly0: info 00000000 csi 00000000 > (probe36:mly0:0:6:0): INQUIRY. CDB: 12 1 80 0 ff 0 > (probe36:mly0:0:6:0): ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:24,0 > (probe36:mly0:0:6:0): Invalid field in CDB > Creating DISK da0 > pass0 at mly0 bus 0 target 6 lun 0 > pass0: Fixed Processor SCSI-2 devices > pass0: 135.168MB/s transfers > pass1 at mly0 bus 1 target 0 lun 0 > pass1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device > pass1: Serial Number V* > pass1: 135.168MB/s transfers > pass0 at mly0 bus 0 target 6 lun 0 > pass0: Fixed Processor SCSI-2 devices > pass0: 135.168MB/s transfers > Mounting root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a >=20 > * down arrow character >=20 > Any suggestions? >=20 > -Bill >=20 > --=20 > -=3D| Bill Swingle - > -=3D| Every message PGP signed > -=3D| Fingerprint: C1E3 49D1 EFC9 3EE0 EA6E 6414 5200 1C95 8E09 0223 > -=3D| "Computers are useless. They can only give you answers" Pablo Picas= so=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 --=20 -=3D| Bill Swingle - -=3D| Every message PGP signed -=3D| Fingerprint: C1E3 49D1 EFC9 3EE0 EA6E 6414 5200 1C95 8E09 0223 -=3D| "Computers are useless. They can only give you answers" Pablo Picasso= =20 --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9WZXVUgAclY4JAiMRAid1AJ9rIHDRnsUFxU0obRfdKCVyD/0otACfSkel diFVqMclMxE2hW+55+uEwks= =sBhr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 16:32:22 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A7A237B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:32:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns.modulabbs.net (ns.modulabbs.net [62.4.20.231]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B870B43E4A for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:32:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mparlebas@modulabbs.net) Received: from isis.modula.bbs (IDENT:D8QlIUNKEwPOWH6CRsKHOgjr23SY/Bzf@isis.modula.bbs [192.168.150.125]) by ns.modulabbs.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/FreeBSD 4.6) with ESMTP id g7DNWIU9008424 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 01:32:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mparlebas@modulabbs.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by isis.modula.bbs (8.11.6/8.11.6/Linux-Red Hat 7.2) id g7DNWIq11323 for stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 01:32:18 +0200 Message-Id: <200208132332.g7DNWIq11323@isis.modula.bbs> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Michel Parlebas To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: unsub Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 01:32:18 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG unsubscribe freebsd-stable To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 17:15:44 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B470537B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 17:15:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cage.simianscience.com (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C84C643E4A for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 17:15:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from house.sentex.net (fcage [192.168.0.2]) by cage.simianscience.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7E0Fa6A079480; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 20:15:37 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020813201252.064f0e28@192.168.0.12> X-Sender: mdtancsa@192.168.0.12 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 20:15:55 -0400 To: "Hartmann, O." From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: Still fxp/nfsd problems after today's recent cvsupdate Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20020813221318.U384-100000@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: amavis-20020220 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 11:05 PM 8/13/2002 +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: >suffered from the bug as mentioned here in the mailing list. Ummm, which one, there were a couple. The 2 main ones I experienced (packet loss on the fxp driver and crashes due to a problem in uipc_mbuf.c were both fixed. >We use the latest rc.diskless scripts, so I did not realize a change since the >last cvsupdate yesterday and the most recent today. It seems that the >kernel on >each terminal run out of memory (most terminals have only 64 MB, but >others have 128MB) When you say run out of memory, do you mean at bootup time ? Are you sure its not something simple like /etc/rc.conf calling /etc/defaults/rc.conf and vice versa ? ---Mike -------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 17:31:42 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1CC637B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 17:31:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from klima.physik.uni-mainz.de (klima.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.180.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C577543E65 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 17:31:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ohartman@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de) Received: from klima.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE (klima.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.180.162]) by klima.physik.uni-mainz.de (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7E0VZ0Q053591; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 02:31:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ohartman@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 02:31:35 +0200 (CEST) From: "Hartmann, O." To: Mike Tancsa Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Still fxp/nfsd problems after today's recent cvsupdate In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20020813201252.064f0e28@192.168.0.12> Message-ID: <20020814022112.K84445-100000@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Mike Tancsa wrote: Hello Mike. I'm sure that this problem is not a simple script problem, because this failure occured from one moment to another when I did a full cvsupdate/world/kernel etc. I had yesterday a similar problem with our diskless stations and the problem got fixed by recompiling the kernel with the sources from the 8th August. At the moment, all terminals are inaccessible. At this moment, the server host for these terminals recompiles a whole world with the most recent stuff and in a few decades of minutes I will see what happens. On the other hand, since yesterday's cvsupdate our MySQL server drops connections and since the most recent update today no connection is possible. I then recompiled the port after the first occurence of that problem, but now, the MySQl server drops EACH connection. The terminals I metioned are also built by the most recent sources, I should mention that here. Hope this problem get out of the world by itself. It would be hard to switch back to the old source from the 8th August and do a whole world from then. On one system this procedure failed and that developed into a scmall horror scenario, because the new-sourced kernel wasn't able t work with old-sourced libraries and binaries and at the end there was a mixe-up of several libraries of both the old and new code and that remained the system completely unstable and unusuable. I had to copy the appropriate trees from a working machine, burned a CD-RW and transfered luckily the files to the crashes machine. Now this system also build a world to come up into a defined state ... :>At 11:05 PM 8/13/2002 +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: :>>suffered from the bug as mentioned here in the mailing list. :> :>Ummm, which one, there were a couple. The 2 main ones I experienced (packet :>loss on the fxp driver and crashes due to a problem in uipc_mbuf.c were :>both fixed. :> :> :>>We use the latest rc.diskless scripts, so I did not realize a change since the :>>last cvsupdate yesterday and the most recent today. It seems that the :>>kernel on :>>each terminal run out of memory (most terminals have only 64 MB, but :>>others have 128MB) :> :>When you say run out of memory, do you mean at bootup time ? Are you sure :>its not something simple like /etc/rc.conf calling /etc/defaults/rc.conf :>and vice versa ? :> :> ---Mike :>-------------------------------------------------------------------- :>Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 :>Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net :>Providing Internet since 1994 www.sentex.net :>Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike :> :> -- MfG O. Hartmann ohartman@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de ------------------------------------------------------------------ IT-Administration des Institutes fuer Physik der Atmosphaere (IPA) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Johannes Gutenberg Universitaet Mainz Becherweg 21 55099 Mainz Tel: +496131/3924662 (Maschinenraum) Tel: +496131/3924144 (Buero) FAX: +496131/3923532 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 17:32:54 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47AE037B400; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 17:32:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from klima.physik.uni-mainz.de (klima.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.180.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6594343E42; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 17:32:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ohartman@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de) Received: from klima.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE (klima.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.180.162]) by klima.physik.uni-mainz.de (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7E0Wm0Q057066; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 02:32:48 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ohartman@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 02:32:48 +0200 (CEST) From: "Hartmann, O." To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20020814021506.Y53934-100000@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Since the most recent cvsupdate today and a build world of FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE, MySQL 3.32.51_2 as built from the ports does no longer work, neither with an four weeks old build nor with a fresh build. Our clients drop always with the error: ERROR 2013: Lost connection to MySQL server during query Does anyone know what this error means and by what it is caused? Thanks in advance, Oliver -- MfG O. Hartmann ohartman@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de ------------------------------------------------------------------ IT-Administration des Institutes fuer Physik der Atmosphaere (IPA) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Johannes Gutenberg Universitaet Mainz Becherweg 21 55099 Mainz Tel: +496131/3924662 (Maschinenraum) Tel: +496131/3924144 (Buero) FAX: +496131/3923532 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 17:42:32 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5587A37B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 17:42:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cage.simianscience.com (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EF4143E4A for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 17:42:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from house.sentex.net (fcage [192.168.0.2]) by cage.simianscience.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7E0gM6A079614; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 20:42:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020813204157.066d8810@192.168.0.12> X-Sender: mdtancsa@192.168.0.12 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 20:42:40 -0400 To: "Hartmann, O." From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: Still fxp/nfsd problems after today's recent cvsupdate Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20020814022112.K84445-100000@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de> References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020813201252.064f0e28@192.168.0.12> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: amavis-20020220 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Do you have the same versions in your local source tree ? news# grep FreeBSD /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_mbuf.c * $FreeBSD: src/sys/kern/uipc_mbuf.c,v 1.51.2.20 2002/08/12 22:09:12 luigi Exp $ news# grep FreeBSD /usr/src/sys/dev/fxp/if_fxp.c * $FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/fxp/if_fxp.c,v 1.110.2.24 2002/08/09 02:04:20 luigi Exp $ ---Mike At 02:31 AM 8/14/2002 +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: >On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Mike Tancsa wrote: > >Hello Mike. > >I'm sure that this problem is not a simple script problem, >because this failure occured from one moment to another >when I did a full cvsupdate/world/kernel etc. > >I had yesterday a similar problem with our diskless stations and the >problem got fixed by recompiling the kernel with the sources from the 8th >August. >At the moment, all terminals are inaccessible. >At this moment, the server host for these terminals recompiles a whole >world with the >most recent stuff and in a few decades of minutes I will see what happens. > >On the other hand, since yesterday's cvsupdate our MySQL server drops >connections and since >the most recent update today no connection is possible. I then recompiled >the port after >the first occurence of that problem, but now, the MySQl server drops EACH >connection. > >The terminals I metioned are also built by the most recent sources, I >should mention that here. > >Hope this problem get out of the world by itself. It would be hard to >switch back to the old source >from the 8th August and do a whole world from then. On one system this >procedure failed and that >developed into a scmall horror scenario, because the new-sourced kernel >wasn't able t work with old-sourced >libraries and binaries and at the end there was a mixe-up of several >libraries of both the old and new code and >that remained the system completely unstable and unusuable. I had to copy >the appropriate trees from a working machine, >burned a CD-RW and transfered luckily the files to the crashes machine. >Now this system also build a world to >come up into a defined state ... > >:>At 11:05 PM 8/13/2002 +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: >:>>suffered from the bug as mentioned here in the mailing list. >:> >:>Ummm, which one, there were a couple. The 2 main ones I experienced (packet >:>loss on the fxp driver and crashes due to a problem in uipc_mbuf.c were >:>both fixed. >:> >:> >:>>We use the latest rc.diskless scripts, so I did not realize a change >since the >:>>last cvsupdate yesterday and the most recent today. It seems that the >:>>kernel on >:>>each terminal run out of memory (most terminals have only 64 MB, but >:>>others have 128MB) >:> >:>When you say run out of memory, do you mean at bootup time ? Are you sure >:>its not something simple like /etc/rc.conf calling /etc/defaults/rc.conf >:>and vice versa ? >:> >:> ---Mike >:>-------------------------------------------------------------------- >:>Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 >:>Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net >:>Providing Internet since 1994 www.sentex.net >:>Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike >:> >:> > >-- >MfG >O. Hartmann > >ohartman@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de >------------------------------------------------------------------ >IT-Administration des Institutes fuer Physik der Atmosphaere (IPA) >------------------------------------------------------------------ >Johannes Gutenberg Universitaet Mainz >Becherweg 21 >55099 Mainz > >Tel: +496131/3924662 (Maschinenraum) >Tel: +496131/3924144 (Buero) >FAX: +496131/3923532 > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 18: 4:28 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C00337B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 18:04:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from klima.physik.uni-mainz.de (klima.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.180.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8636343E6A for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 18:04:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ohartman@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de) Received: from klima.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE (klima.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.180.162]) by klima.physik.uni-mainz.de (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7E14L0Q026730; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 03:04:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ohartman@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 03:04:21 +0200 (CEST) From: "Hartmann, O." To: Mike Tancsa Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Still fxp/nfsd problems after today's recent cvsupdate In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20020813204157.066d8810@192.168.0.12> Message-ID: <20020814025958.S24334-100000@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Mike Tancsa wrote: Yes, these versions are part of my local source tree: * @(#)uipc_mbuf.c 8.2 (Berkeley) 1/4/94 * $FreeBSD: src/sys/kern/uipc_mbuf.c,v 1.51.2.20 2002/08/12 22:09:12 luigi Exp $ and * * $FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/fxp/if_fxp.c,v 1.110.2.24 2002/08/09 02:04:20 luigi Exp $ */ :> :>Do you have the same versions in your local source tree ? :> :>news# grep FreeBSD /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_mbuf.c :> * $FreeBSD: src/sys/kern/uipc_mbuf.c,v 1.51.2.20 2002/08/12 22:09:12 :>luigi Exp $ :>news# grep FreeBSD /usr/src/sys/dev/fxp/if_fxp.c :> * $FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/fxp/if_fxp.c,v 1.110.2.24 2002/08/09 02:04:20 :>luigi Exp $ :> :> :> ---Mike :> :>At 02:31 AM 8/14/2002 +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: :>>On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Mike Tancsa wrote: :>> :>>Hello Mike. :>> :>>I'm sure that this problem is not a simple script problem, :>>because this failure occured from one moment to another :>>when I did a full cvsupdate/world/kernel etc. :>> :>>I had yesterday a similar problem with our diskless stations and the :>>problem got fixed by recompiling the kernel with the sources from the 8th :>>August. :>>At the moment, all terminals are inaccessible. :>>At this moment, the server host for these terminals recompiles a whole :>>world with the :>>most recent stuff and in a few decades of minutes I will see what happens. :>> :>>On the other hand, since yesterday's cvsupdate our MySQL server drops :>>connections and since :>>the most recent update today no connection is possible. I then recompiled :>>the port after :>>the first occurence of that problem, but now, the MySQl server drops EACH :>>connection. :>> :>>The terminals I metioned are also built by the most recent sources, I :>>should mention that here. :>> :>>Hope this problem get out of the world by itself. It would be hard to :>>switch back to the old source :>>from the 8th August and do a whole world from then. On one system this :>>procedure failed and that :>>developed into a scmall horror scenario, because the new-sourced kernel :>>wasn't able t work with old-sourced :>>libraries and binaries and at the end there was a mixe-up of several :>>libraries of both the old and new code and :>>that remained the system completely unstable and unusuable. I had to copy :>>the appropriate trees from a working machine, :>>burned a CD-RW and transfered luckily the files to the crashes machine. :>>Now this system also build a world to :>>come up into a defined state ... :>> :>>:>At 11:05 PM 8/13/2002 +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: :>>:>>suffered from the bug as mentioned here in the mailing list. :>>:> :>>:>Ummm, which one, there were a couple. The 2 main ones I experienced (packet :>>:>loss on the fxp driver and crashes due to a problem in uipc_mbuf.c were :>>:>both fixed. :>>:> :>>:> :>>:>>We use the latest rc.diskless scripts, so I did not realize a change :>>since the :>>:>>last cvsupdate yesterday and the most recent today. It seems that the :>>:>>kernel on :>>:>>each terminal run out of memory (most terminals have only 64 MB, but :>>:>>others have 128MB) :>>:> :>>:>When you say run out of memory, do you mean at bootup time ? Are you sure :>>:>its not something simple like /etc/rc.conf calling /etc/defaults/rc.conf :>>:>and vice versa ? :>>:> :>>:> ---Mike :>>:>-------------------------------------------------------------------- :>>:>Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 :>>:>Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net :>>:>Providing Internet since 1994 www.sentex.net :>>:>Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike :>>:> :>>:> :>> :>>-- :>>MfG :>>O. Hartmann :>> :>>ohartman@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de :>>------------------------------------------------------------------ :>>IT-Administration des Institutes fuer Physik der Atmosphaere (IPA) :>>------------------------------------------------------------------ :>>Johannes Gutenberg Universitaet Mainz :>>Becherweg 21 :>>55099 Mainz :>> :>>Tel: +496131/3924662 (Maschinenraum) :>>Tel: +496131/3924144 (Buero) :>>FAX: +496131/3923532 :>> :>> :>>To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org :>>with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message :> :>-------------------------------------------------------------------- :>Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 :>Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net :>Providing Internet since 1994 www.sentex.net :>Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike :> :> -- MfG O. Hartmann ohartman@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de ------------------------------------------------------------------ IT-Administration des Institutes fuer Physik der Atmosphaere (IPA) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Johannes Gutenberg Universitaet Mainz Becherweg 21 55099 Mainz Tel: +496131/3924662 (Maschinenraum) Tel: +496131/3924144 (Buero) FAX: +496131/3923532 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 18: 5: 8 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D7FE37B401 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 18:05:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns.itga.com.au (ns.itga.com.au [202.53.40.210]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B90143E42 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 18:05:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnb@itga.com.au) Received: from lightning.itga.com.au (lightning.itga.com.au [192.168.71.20]) by ns.itga.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA33339; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:05:01 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from gnb@itga.com.au) Received: from lightning.itga.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lightning.itga.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA06018; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:05:01 +1000 (EST) Message-Id: <200208140105.LAA06018@lightning.itga.com.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 05/15/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 From: Gregory Bond To: Danny Carroll Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bug in Zoo? Or is it in ls or ffs? In-reply-to: Your message of 13 Aug 2002 15:43:00 +0200. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:05:01 +1000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > As you can see the size is not taken up in disk space so I suspect the > bug is in ls. DU, DF and the left hand column of LS looks OK. No, it's a probably a bug in zoo, lseek()ing to a negative offset and/or getting long <-> long long conversions wrong. This gets turned into a large positive offset. (4294967352 is 2^32 + 56) Then when zoo writes a single byte, the filesystem has to allocate single and double-indirect blocks, plus the data, which is where the 40 used blocks comes from. This behaviour doesn't force the filesystem to allocate of all the 4G of intervening holes. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 20:29:40 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02CE237B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 20:29:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alcanet.com.au (mail3.alcanet.com.au [208.178.117.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B06D43E70 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 20:29:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au) Received: from sydsmtp01.alcatel.com.au (IDENT:root@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alcanet.com.au (8.12.4/8.12.4/Alcanet1.3) with ESMTP id g7E3TR8R008672; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:29:28 +1000 Received: from gsmx07.alcatel.com.au ([139.188.20.247]) by sydsmtp01.alcatel.com.au (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.10) with ESMTP id 2002081413292651:79834 ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:29:26 +1000 Received: from gsmx07.alcatel.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gsmx07.alcatel.com.au (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7E3TQhh073245; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:29:26 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au) Received: (from jeremyp@localhost) by gsmx07.alcatel.com.au (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g7E3TQGs073244; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:29:26 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:29:26 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy To: Josef Karthauser Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: usb MFC? [was: HEADS UP: FreeBSD 4.7 Code Freeze] Message-ID: <20020814132926.C72938@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au> Mail-Followup-To: Josef Karthauser , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20020812193712.GA369@genius.tao.org.uk> <20020812215059.N59573-100000@server.arg.sj.co.uk> <20020812213700.GE369@genius.tao.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20020812213700.GE369@genius.tao.org.uk>; from joe@tao.org.uk on Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 10:37:00PM +0100 X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on SYDSMTP01/AlcatelAustralia(Release 5.0.10 |March 22, 2002) at 14/08/2002 01:29:26 PM, Serialize by Router on SYDSMTP01/AlcatelAustralia(Release 5.0.10 |March 22, 2002) at 14/08/2002 01:29:28 PM, Serialize complete at 14/08/2002 01:29:28 PM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 2002-Aug-12 22:37:00 +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote: >It would help if I had an idea of what works and what's broken in >-stable for usb. I'd welcome reports from usb users. I have a Sony Cybershot (umass camera) that won't work with a a Compaq Armada 1592DT running -stable from about 3 weeks ago. I've tried on a couple of other -stable systems of varying dates and the camera works - one difference is that the other systems all use UHCI controllers. Is there a problem in the OHCI code? The relevant probe messages are: ohci0: mem 0x41000000-0x41000fff irq 11 at device 16.0 on pci0 usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb0: on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: (unknown) OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered If I start usbd and then connect the camera, I get: # usbd -dvvv usbd: opened /dev/usb0 usbd: reading configuration file /etc/usbd.conf usbd: action 1: ActiveWire board, firmware download vndr=0x0854 prdct=0x0100 rlse=0x0000 attach='/usr/local/bin/ezdownload -f /usr/local/share/usb/firmware/0854.0100.0_01.hex ${DEVNAME}' usbd: action 2: Entrega Serial with UART vndr=0x1645 prdct=0x8001 rlse=0x0101 attach='/usr/sbin/ezdownload -v -f /usr/share/usb/firmware/1645.8001.0101 /dev/${DEVNAME}' usbd: action 3: USB ethernet devname: [ack]ue[0-9]+ attach='dhclient ${DEVNAME}' detach='killall dhclient' usbd: action 4: Mouse devname: ums[0-9]+ attach='/usr/sbin/moused -p /dev/${DEVNAME} -I /var/run/moused.${DEVNAME}.pid' usbd: action 5: USB device usbd: 5 actions usbd: opened /dev/usb usbd: attach event at 0.030458000, OHCI root hub, (unknown): vndr=0x0000 prdct=0x0000 rlse=0x0100 clss=0x0009 subclss=0x0000 prtcl=0x0000 device names: uhub0 usbd: Found action 'USB device' for OHCI root hub, (unknown) at uhub0 usbd: action 0: USB device usbd: Setting DEVNAME='uhub0' usbd: doing discovery on /dev/usb0 usbd: doing discovery on /dev/usb0 usbd: doing discovery on /dev/usb0 usbd: doing discovery on /dev/usb0 ^C pciconf shows: ohci0@pci0:16:0: class=0x0c0310 card=0xa0f80e11 chip=0xa0f80e11 rev=0x06 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Compaq Computer Corp.' device = 'ZFMicro USB Open Host Controller' class = serial bus subclass = USB Where the 'doing discovery' lines match me (dis)connecting the camera. Note that the camera itself isn't discovered. If I stop usbd and restart usbd, it doesn't even detect that the camera has been attached. Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 20:48: 6 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0282637B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 20:48:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from TheWorld.com (pcls2.std.com [199.172.62.104]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B7543E3B for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 20:48:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kwc@shell.TheWorld.com) Received: from shell.TheWorld.com (john@shell01.TheWorld.com [199.172.62.241]) by TheWorld.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA25763; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 23:47:59 -0400 Received: (from kwc@localhost) by shell.TheWorld.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id XAA70928087; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 23:47:59 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 23:47:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Kenneth W Cochran Message-Id: <200208140347.XAA70928087@shell.TheWorld.com> To: Josef Karthauser Subject: Re: usb MFC? [was: HEADS UP: FreeBSD 4.7 Code Freeze] Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20020812193712.GA369@genius.tao.org.uk> <20020812215059.N59573-100000@server.arg.sj.co.uk> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 22:37:00 +0100 >From: Josef Karthauser >To: Andrew Gordon >Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG >Subject: Re: usb MFC? [was: HEADS UP: FreeBSD 4.7 Code Freeze] > [...snip...] > >It would help if I had an idea of what works and what's broken in >-stable for usb. I'd welcome reports from usb users. > >Joe Olympus E-10. umass driver Supposed to be a msdos "filesystem" on it. Camera is detected ok by usbd, but os panics on mount attempt. There may be an old pr about this, I don't know. This problem dates back before early January, 2002. I was working with someone, trying to help debug/test with kernel dumps but haven't heard anything in several months now. -kc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 21:49:10 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 913E237B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 21:49:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (rwcrmhc51.attbi.com [204.127.198.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26F8D43E4A for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 21:49:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from crist.clark@attbi.com) Received: from blossom.cjclark.org ([12.234.91.48]) by rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020814044907.CLKR19356.rwcrmhc51.attbi.com@blossom.cjclark.org>; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 04:49:07 +0000 Received: from blossom.cjclark.org (localhost. [127.0.0.1]) by blossom.cjclark.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g7E4n7JK011607; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 21:49:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from crist.clark@attbi.com) Received: (from cjc@localhost) by blossom.cjclark.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g7E4n6FS011555; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 21:49:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: blossom.cjclark.org: cjc set sender to crist.clark@attbi.com using -f Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 21:49:05 -0700 From: "Crist J. Clark" To: "David A. Panariti" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Request for micro patch to /etc/defaults/rc.conf Message-ID: <20020814044905.GB7225@blossom.cjclark.org> Reply-To: "Crist J. Clark" References: <20020812.122638.115901950.davep@meduseld.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020812.122638.115901950.davep@meduseld.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-URL: http://people.freebsd.org/~cjc/ Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 12:26:38PM -0400, David A. Panariti wrote: > In /etc/defaults/rc.conf, the variants of sendmail are started up with > differing -L options for easy log-file identification. > > However, both sendmail_submit and regular sendmail use -L sm-mta. > This reduces the usefulness of -L, since two variants use the same > label. But the two do not run at the same time so there is nothing to be confused in the logs. This is not necessary. -- Crist J. Clark | cjclark@alum.mit.edu | cjclark@jhu.edu http://people.freebsd.org/~cjc/ | cjc@freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 22: 4:49 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD41337B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 22:04:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (rwcrmhc51.attbi.com [204.127.198.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7382943E75 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 22:04:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from crist.clark@attbi.com) Received: from blossom.cjclark.org ([12.234.91.48]) by rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020814050446.DFOV19356.rwcrmhc51.attbi.com@blossom.cjclark.org>; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 05:04:46 +0000 Received: from blossom.cjclark.org (localhost. [127.0.0.1]) by blossom.cjclark.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g7E54jJK042037; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 22:04:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from crist.clark@attbi.com) Received: (from cjc@localhost) by blossom.cjclark.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g7E54i88042036; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 22:04:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: blossom.cjclark.org: cjc set sender to crist.clark@attbi.com using -f Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 22:04:43 -0700 From: "Crist J. Clark" To: Willie Viljoen Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Ethernet Bridging sysctls not taking effect? Message-ID: <20020814050443.GC7225@blossom.cjclark.org> Reply-To: "Crist J. Clark" References: <20020812230244.J6225-100000@phoenix.vh.laserfence.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020812230244.J6225-100000@phoenix.vh.laserfence.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-URL: http://people.freebsd.org/~cjc/ Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 11:05:14PM +0200, Willie Viljoen wrote: > Hi, I noticed a small hitch with ethernet bridging when a power failure > rebooted a machine tonight... > > It seems that if sysctls for bridging are placed in /etc/sysctl.conf, they > are set to those values, but the kernel doesn't seem to take notice. > Bridging only starts working once the sysctls are set -again- at run time. > > Could sysctl.conf be getting processed before code needed for bridging > comes into effect? Bridging is compiled into the kernel on the machine. > > Does anybody know why this would be happening? Exactly what version of FreeBSD are you running? After a reboot, what values are in the sysctl(8)s? Are you logging the rc(8) output (like in console.log) so we can see the output when those sysctl(8)s are supposed to be set? -- Crist J. Clark | cjclark@alum.mit.edu | cjclark@jhu.edu http://people.freebsd.org/~cjc/ | cjc@freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 22:39:35 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11CDE37B400; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 22:39:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.sw.oz.au (mail.aurema.com [203.31.96.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6F3E43E42; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 22:39:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from vance@aurema.com) Received: (from vance@localhost) by smtp.sw.oz.au (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) id PAA01513; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 15:39:25 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 15:39:25 +1000 From: Christopher Vance To: www@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: HTTP mirror www.au.freebsd.org is broken Message-ID: <20020814153925.B22888@aurema.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This doesn't seem to have been updated since May. Please give them a kick or remove their DNS entry. -- Christopher Vance To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 22:48:13 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C26E637B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 22:48:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipv6.ppk.itb.ac.id (gerbang.ppk.itb.ac.id [167.205.25.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3083C43E42 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 22:48:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dikshie@ppk.itb.ac.id) Received: by ipv6.ppk.itb.ac.id (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1A2F223046; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 12:48:28 +0700 (WIT) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 12:48:28 +0700 From: Dikshie To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: warning when cvsup Message-ID: <20020814054828.GA48175@ppk.itb.ac.id> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: (FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE i386) X-Uptime: 12:46PM up 2 days, 2:08, 2 users, load averages: 0.08, 0.17, 0.14 X-Organization: Pusat Penelitian Kelautan (PPK) X-Location: Labtek VI Building, Institute of Technology, Bandung, Indonesia X-Web-Site: http://ipv6.ppk.itb.ac.id/~dikshie X-IPv6: 2001:200:830:4:1::15/80, http://www.ipv6.itb.ac.id X-Provider: AI3-Net, http://www.ai3.itb.ac.id X-ICQ: 47556213 X-Yahoo-ID: dikshie Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ipv6# Parsing supfile "/usr/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile" Connecting to cvsup3.FreeBSD.org Connected to cvsup3.FreeBSD.org Server software version: SNAP_16_1e Negotiating file attribute support Exchanging collection information Establishing multiplexed-mode data connection Running Updating collection src-all/cvs Server warning: Cannot open "/usr/local/etc/cvsup/prefixes/FreeBSD.cvs/src/contrib/sendmail/BuildTools/OS/A-UX,v": No such file or directory -dikshie- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 23:16:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36E7537B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 23:16:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rshb.com.ru (rshb.com.ru [195.162.58.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B80443E6E for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 23:16:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from admin@rshb.com.ru) Received: by rshb.com.ru (Sendmail for UK-NC RT11-SJ, from userid 426) id F1AAB21144; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:16:06 +0700 (OMSST) Received: from rshb.com.ru (vampiro.rsb.local [192.168.1.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Evgueni V. Gavrilov", Issuer "RSHB Omsk branch CA" (verified OK)) by rshb.com.ru (Sendmail for UK-NC RT11-SJ) with ESMTP id C582720F0B for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:16:06 +0700 (OMSST) Message-ID: <3D59F5A7.70607@rshb.com.ru> Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:16:07 +0700 From: "Evgueni V. Gavrilov" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020813 X-Accept-Language: ru, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: gotcha with OpenSSH 3.4 and PrivilegeSeparation Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG hi I noticed a gotcha in OpenSSH 3.4 with privilege separation turned on. Upon loosing of remote client unprivileged process of sshd doesn't die. I tried to vary KeepAlive and/or ClientAlive* settings but nothing changed. The only way to manage the gotcha is to send -HUP to master of unprivileged process. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 23:30:33 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C8B937B400 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 23:30:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from copoc.ru (selena.copoc.ru [195.2.84.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EB0F43E70 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 23:30:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eugene@emetex.ru) Received: from eugene (eugene.office.copoc.ru [192.168.1.10]) by copoc.ru (8.12.5/8.12.5) with SMTP id g7E6UQYT040313 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 10:30:27 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from eugene@emetex.ru) Message-ID: <005b01c2435c$13ce13c0$01000001@office.emetex.ru> From: "=?koi8-r?B?5dfHxc7JyiDwz8TLz9DBxdc=?=" To: Subject: Port devel/pear Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 10:30:26 +0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0058_01C2437D.9AB4FA40" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0058_01C2437D.9AB4FA40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! Port devel/pear is now forbidden by the reason "This module is now part = of mod_php4 as of 4.1.0". But, as I noticed, mod_php4 port doesn't = install pear. How can I install port devel/pear? --- Eugene Podkopaev ------=_NextPart_000_0058_01C2437D.9AB4FA40 Content-Type: text/html; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi!
 
Port devel/pear is now forbidden = by the reason=20 "This module is now part of mod_php4 as of 4.1.0". But, as I noticed, = mod_php4=20 port doesn't install pear.
 
How can I install port = devel/pear?
 
---
Eugene Podkopaev
 
------=_NextPart_000_0058_01C2437D.9AB4FA40-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 13 23:37:19 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E8DE37B401 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 23:37:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rshb.com.ru (rshb.com.ru [195.162.58.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3C1A43E6A for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 23:37:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from admin@rshb.com.ru) Received: by rshb.com.ru (Sendmail for UK-NC RT11-SJ, from userid 426) id 132B221145; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:37:14 +0700 (OMSST) Received: from rshb.com.ru (vampiro.rsb.local [192.168.1.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Evgueni V. Gavrilov", Issuer "RSHB Omsk branch CA" (verified OK)) by rshb.com.ru (Sendmail for UK-NC RT11-SJ) with ESMTP id E05DD20F0B; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:37:13 +0700 (OMSST) Message-ID: <3D59FA9A.2030605@rshb.com.ru> Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:37:14 +0700 From: "Evgueni V. Gavrilov" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020813 X-Accept-Language: ru, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E5=D7=C7=C5=CE=C9=CA_=F0=CF=C4=CB=CF=D0=C1=C5=D7?= Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Port devel/pear References: <005b01c2435c$13ce13c0$01000001@office.emetex.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG å×ÇÅÎÉÊ ðÏÄËÏÐÁÅ× wrote: > Port devel/pear is now forbidden by the reason "This module is now part > of mod_php4 as of 4.1.0". But, as I noticed, mod_php4 port doesn't > install pear. > > How can I install port devel/pear? perl -pi -e 's/^FORBIDDEN.*//' Makefile To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 0:19:36 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A5A937B401 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 00:19:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from copoc.ru (selena.copoc.ru [195.2.84.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0500B43E81 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 00:19:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eugene@selena.copoc.ru) Received: from selena.copoc.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by copoc.ru (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7E7JUYR042582; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:19:30 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from eugene@selena.copoc.ru) Received: (from eugene@localhost) by selena.copoc.ru (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g7E7JT4X042581; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:19:30 +0400 (MSD) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:19:29 +0400 From: Eugene To: "Evgueni V. Gavrilov" Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Port devel/pear Message-ID: <20020814071929.GA42326@emetex.ru> References: <005b01c2435c$13ce13c0$01000001@office.emetex.ru> <3D59FA9A.2030605@rshb.com.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <3D59FA9A.2030605@rshb.com.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Evgueni V. Gavrilov(admin@rshb.com.ru)@2002.08.14 13:37:14 +0000: > Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:37:14 +0700 > From: "Evgueni V. Gavrilov" > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020813 > X-Accept-Language: ru, en > To: å×ÇÅÎÉÊ ðÏÄËÏÐÁÅ× > Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Port devel/pear > > å×ÇÅÎÉÊ ðÏÄËÏÐÁÅ× wrote: > > >Port devel/pear is now forbidden by the reason "This module is now part > >of mod_php4 as of 4.1.0". But, as I noticed, mod_php4 port doesn't > >install pear. > > > >How can I install port devel/pear? > perl -pi -e 's/^FORBIDDEN.*//' Makefile > It is clear that remove FORBIDDEN line is enough, but I guess people want to have a legal way to install pear. Thank you! --- Eugene Podkopaev To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 1:38:17 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E2ED37B400 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 01:38:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from office.advantage-interactive.com (host217-37-74-237.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.37.74.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C48143E86 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 01:38:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from simond@irrelevant.org) Received: from devbox.advantage-interactive.com ([192.168.254.128]) by office.advantage-interactive.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 17etf5-00007M-00; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 09:37:51 +0100 Subject: Re: Port devel/pear From: Simon Dick To: Eugene Cc: "Evgueni V. Gavrilov" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20020814071929.GA42326@emetex.ru> References: <005b01c2435c$13ce13c0$01000001@office.emetex.ru> <3D59FA9A.2030605@rshb.com.ru> <20020814071929.GA42326@emetex.ru> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.2 Date: 14 Aug 2002 09:37:50 +0100 Message-Id: <1029314271.1502.0.camel@linux> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 08:19, Eugene wrote: > Evgueni V. Gavrilov(admin@rshb.com.ru)@2002.08.14 13:37:14 +0000: > > Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:37:14 +0700 > > From: "Evgueni V. Gavrilov" > > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020813 > > X-Accept-Language: ru, en > > To: > > Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > > Subject: Re: Port devel/pear > > > > wrote: > > > > >Port devel/pear is now forbidden by the reason "This module is now part > > >of mod_php4 as of 4.1.0". But, as I noticed, mod_php4 port doesn't > > >install pear. > > > > > >How can I install port devel/pear? > > perl -pi -e 's/^FORBIDDEN.*//' Makefile > > > > It is clear that remove FORBIDDEN line is enough, but I guess people want > to have a legal way to install pear. Strange how all the mod_php4 installs I've done since 4.0.6 at least have included pear, you may want to actually look to make sure you don't have it. -- Simon Dick simond@irrelevant.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 3:14:36 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B76A537B400 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 03:14:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from copoc.ru (selena.copoc.ru [195.2.84.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3634F43E65 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 03:14:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eugene@selena.copoc.ru) Received: from selena.copoc.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by copoc.ru (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7EAERYR050804; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:14:28 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from eugene@selena.copoc.ru) Received: (from eugene@localhost) by selena.copoc.ru (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g7EAEQO5050800; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:14:26 +0400 (MSD) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:14:26 +0400 From: Eugene To: Simon Dick Cc: "Evgueni V. Gavrilov" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Port devel/pear Message-ID: <20020814101426.GA48417@emetex.ru> References: <005b01c2435c$13ce13c0$01000001@office.emetex.ru> <3D59FA9A.2030605@rshb.com.ru> <20020814071929.GA42326@emetex.ru> <1029314271.1502.0.camel@linux> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1029314271.1502.0.camel@linux> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Simon Dick(simond@irrelevant.org)@2002.08.14 09:37:50 +0000: > Subject: Re: Port devel/pear > From: Simon Dick > To: Eugene > Cc: "Evgueni V. Gavrilov" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > In-Reply-To: <20020814071929.GA42326@emetex.ru> > X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.2 > Date: 14 Aug 2002 09:37:50 +0100 > > On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 08:19, Eugene wrote: > > Evgueni V. Gavrilov(admin@rshb.com.ru)@2002.08.14 13:37:14 +0000: > > > Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:37:14 +0700 > > > From: "Evgueni V. Gavrilov" > > > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020813 > > > X-Accept-Language: ru, en > > > To: > > > Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > > > Subject: Re: Port devel/pear > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >Port devel/pear is now forbidden by the reason "This module is now part > > > >of mod_php4 as of 4.1.0". But, as I noticed, mod_php4 port doesn't > > > >install pear. > > > > > > > >How can I install port devel/pear? > > > perl -pi -e 's/^FORBIDDEN.*//' Makefile > > > > > > > It is clear that remove FORBIDDEN line is enough, but I guess people want > > to have a legal way to install pear. > > Strange how all the mod_php4 installs I've done since 4.0.6 at least > have included pear, you may want to actually look to make sure you don't > have it. Well, horde port depends on mod_php4. PHP 4.2.2 doesn't contain class Log, which is required by horde. This class is present in pear port, so I had to copy class Log from PHP 4.1 or install pear port after cutting FORBIDDEN from Makefile. By the way, pear requirements for horde mentioned in http://www.horde.org/pear/ I just want to draw attention that there is no way to make horde work with provided manner. Thank you! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 3:38:44 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F08237B400 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 03:38:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C70D643E72 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 03:38:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie) Received: from walton.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP id ; 14 Aug 2002 11:38:40 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:38:40 +0100 From: David Malone To: dimension 6 Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: suggestion for 4.7 Message-ID: <20020814103840.GA45280@walton.maths.tcd.ie> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 10:56:19PM +0000, dimension 6 wrote: > I really have been suffered from FreeBSD's system hangs on my system > (athlon amd). I am new to FreeBSD, but I know some people complaining about > same problem as I have on FreeBSD. It stops responding during installation > or whatever I try to install something larger than normal. Is it possible the machine is overheating? Installing things involves gunzipping, which would make the CPU active - if your fans aren't up to scratch it could overheat at this time. David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 4: 0:45 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A597837B400 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 04:00:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ans.signature.nl (ans.signature.nl [213.133.38.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E3CC43E75 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 04:00:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bit@signature.nl) Received: by ans.signature.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B56E33E2F; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:00:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ans.signature.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B341920CC; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:00:35 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:00:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Bart Smit X-X-Sender: bit@localhost To: dimension 6 Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: suggestion for 4.7 In-Reply-To: <20020814103840.GA45280@walton.maths.tcd.ie> Message-ID: <20020814124344.Q99588-100000@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 10:56:19PM +0000, dimension 6 wrote: > I really have been suffered from FreeBSD's system hangs on my system > (athlon amd). I am new to FreeBSD, but I know some people complaining > about same problem as I have on FreeBSD. It stops responding during > installation or whatever I try to install something larger than normal. When you say "system hangs" and "it stops responding", does that mean that the entire system hangs (and will not react to anything such as interrupting the installation program, switching vty, pressing alt-ctrl-del, or ejecting the cd), or does the install stop (while the system continues to work)? I have seen the latter (install stops; system works fine) happen a few times, and it was my impression that the atapi cdrom drive I was using was at fault; I never had it during ftp install or when i used a scsi cdrom drive. But it was only a vague impression. Never really investigated. And if you have the former (complete hang) it's even more likely that you have hardware problems... --Bart To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 4:44:58 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E06B737B400 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 04:44:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bilver.wjv.com (user38.net339.fl.sprint-hsd.net [65.40.24.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 063E843E6A for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 04:44:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bv@bilver.wjv.com) Received: from bilver.wjv.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bilver.wjv.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7EBihOo077590 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:44:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from bv@bilver.wjv.com) Received: (from bv@localhost) by bilver.wjv.com (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g7EBihmF077589 for stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:44:43 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:44:42 -0400 From: Bill Vermillion To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: A but in Zoo Message-ID: <20020814114442.GA77130@wjv.com> Reply-To: bv@wjv.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Organization: W.J.Vermillion / Orlando - Winter Park Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:02:26 +0200 > From: > Subject: RE: Bug in Zoo? Or is it in ls or ffs? > Is this not a bug in ls or ffs as well then? > Regardless of what Zoo does, should not the OS remain sane? > - -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Burke [mailto:mburke@isn.net] > On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 10:43, Danny Carroll wrote: > > As you can see the size is not taken up in disk space so I suspect the > > bug is in ls. DU, DF and the left hand column of LS looks OK. > > --output-- > Looks like you're getting a sparse file -- a large file that actually > takes up little space. It's created by a program seeking beyond the end > of the file but not writing anything (I may be off a bit, but this is > how I understand it). The reported size of the file is large, but it > doesn't take up that much space, which is why df suggests that it's not > significant. > Although I've never used zoo, it's probably a bug there. Hm. I've been using zoo since about 1989 - the old 1.x days. I've always had it on a system here as I had many old files I'd pull apart. I've used it dating back to Sys V.2's and I use it for working under MS things too. It works for easily transporting files from a multitude of OSes. I just checked on about 6 systems I have access to, 4.6, 4.5, 4.2 and a 4.0, and they all exhibit the same behaviour. I don't know when it changed, but the sources to zoo have not changed since the early 1990s, and the sources when extracted all show a day of May 1, 1993. So I'm suspecting that something changed in the 4.x series. I don't have anything prior to 4.x to check on. I've not created any zoo archives in the past couple of years but it used to work, and I've used it on many platforms. Since the code is the same and has not changed since Rahul Dhesi wrote the last version in 1991 - would it not stand to reason then that something has changed in FreeBSD since the 4.x came out. Could someone who has a pre 4.x system check this? Bill -- Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 6: 0:48 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57CDB37B405 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 06:00:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailf.telia.com (mailf.telia.com [194.22.194.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CE9343E70 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 06:00:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from d1o913.telia.com (d1o913.telia.com [195.252.44.241]) by mailf.telia.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7ED0Zn6013765 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 15:00:35 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-Recipient: Received: from falcon.midgard.homeip.net (h62n2fls20o913.telia.com [212.181.163.62]) by d1o913.telia.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id PAA09459 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 15:00:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 58709 invoked by uid 1001); 14 Aug 2002 13:00:31 -0000 Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 15:00:31 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson To: Bill Vermillion Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: A but in Zoo Message-ID: <20020814130031.GA58489@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: Bill Vermillion , stable@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@freebsd.org References: <20020814114442.GA77130@wjv.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020814114442.GA77130@wjv.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 07:44:42AM -0400, Bill Vermillion wrote: > > Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:02:26 +0200 > > From: > > Subject: RE: Bug in Zoo? Or is it in ls or ffs? > > > Is this not a bug in ls or ffs as well then? > > Regardless of what Zoo does, should not the OS remain sane? > > > - -----Original Message----- > > From: Michael Burke [mailto:mburke@isn.net] > > > On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 10:43, Danny Carroll wrote: > > > As you can see the size is not taken up in disk space so I suspect the > > > bug is in ls. DU, DF and the left hand column of LS looks OK. > > > > --output-- > > > Looks like you're getting a sparse file -- a large file that actually > > takes up little space. It's created by a program seeking beyond the end > > of the file but not writing anything (I may be off a bit, but this is > > how I understand it). The reported size of the file is large, but it > > doesn't take up that much space, which is why df suggests that it's not > > significant. > > > Although I've never used zoo, it's probably a bug there. > > Hm. I've been using zoo since about 1989 - the old 1.x days. > I've always had it on a system here as I had many old files > I'd pull apart. I've used it dating back to Sys V.2's and I use > it for working under MS things too. It works for easily > transporting files from a multitude of OSes. > > I just checked on about 6 systems I have access to, 4.6, 4.5, 4.2 > and a 4.0, and they all exhibit the same behaviour. I don't know > when it changed, but the sources to zoo have not changed since > the early 1990s, and the sources when extracted all show > a day of May 1, 1993. > > So I'm suspecting that something changed in the 4.x series. > I don't have anything prior to 4.x to check on. > > I've not created any zoo archives in the past couple of years but > it used to work, and I've used it on many platforms. > Since the code is the same and has not changed since Rahul Dhesi > wrote the last version in 1991 - would it not stand to reason then > that something has changed in FreeBSD since the 4.x came out. > > Could someone who has a pre 4.x system check this? A quick investigation indicates that this is a bug in zoo. It presumably was not exposed on earlier versions of FreeBSD. To be more precise the function zootrunc() which can be found at the end of the file bsd.c contains a line seekpos = lseek(fd, 0L, SEEK_CUR); This should be changed to seekpos = lseek(fd, (off_t) 0L, SEEK_CUR); The second argument to lseek should be a 64-bit value on FreeBSD, but here it is called with a long which is a 32-bit value on the i386. This means that the upper 32 bits of the argument that lseek sees will contain garbage. In this case they always seem to have the value 0x00000001 which leads to the observed behaviour of a sparse file with size ~4GB. The following patch to the port should fix this problem , but I would not be surprised if there are other, similar, bugs in zoo. Older code often has problems with 64-bit arguments. cvs diff: Diffing . cvs diff: Diffing files Index: files/patch-aa =================================================================== RCS file: /ncvs/ports/archivers/zoo/files/patch-aa,v retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.4 patch-aa --- files/patch-aa 24 Apr 1997 02:12:23 -0000 1.4 +++ files/patch-aa 14 Aug 2002 12:54:52 -0000 @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ ! extern long lseek(); ! long seekpos; int fd = fileno(f); - seekpos = lseek(fd, 0L, SEEK_CUR); +! seekpos = lseek(fd, 0L, SEEK_CUR); if (seekpos >= 0) --- 96,114 ---- /* Standard UNIX-specific file attribute routines */ @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ ! extern off_t lseek(); ! off_t seekpos; int fd = fileno(f); - seekpos = lseek(fd, 0L, SEEK_CUR); +! seekpos = lseek(fd, (off_t)0L, SEEK_CUR); if (seekpos >= 0) *** misc2.c.old Thu Aug 8 09:34:48 1991 --- misc2.c Thu Jan 5 05:37:06 1995 -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 6:13:22 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA8C37B401 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 06:13:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (leviathan.inethouston.net [66.64.12.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5802E43E72 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 06:13:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwcjr@inethouston.net) Received: by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5C1FC3198F9; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:13:15 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:13:15 -0500 From: "David W. Chapman Jr." To: David Malone Cc: dimension 6 , stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: suggestion for 4.7 Message-ID: <20020814131315.GD96151@leviathan.inethouston.net> Reply-To: "David W. Chapman Jr." Mail-Followup-To: David Malone , dimension 6 , stable@freebsd.org References: <20020814103840.GA45280@walton.maths.tcd.ie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020814103840.GA45280@walton.maths.tcd.ie> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE i386 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 11:38:40AM +0100, David Malone wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 10:56:19PM +0000, dimension 6 wrote: > > I really have been suffered from FreeBSD's system hangs on my system > > (athlon amd). I am new to FreeBSD, but I know some people complaining about > > same problem as I have on FreeBSD. It stops responding during installation > > or whatever I try to install something larger than normal. > > Is it possible the machine is overheating? Installing things involves > gunzipping, which would make the CPU active - if your fans aren't up > to scratch it could overheat at this time. I would tend to agree. The majority of the problems people have with athlons are due to overheating or lack of power. They run hotter than intel chips and require more power and more cooling. -- David W. Chapman Jr. dwcjr@inethouston.net Raintree Network Services, Inc. dwcjr@freebsd.org FreeBSD Committer To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 6:16: 6 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DF8D37B400; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 06:15:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bilver.wjv.com (user38.net339.fl.sprint-hsd.net [65.40.24.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6DF043E42; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 06:15:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bv@bilver.wjv.com) Received: from bilver.wjv.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bilver.wjv.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7EDFtOo078851; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 09:15:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from bv@bilver.wjv.com) Received: (from bv@localhost) by bilver.wjv.com (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g7EDFtx5078850; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 09:15:55 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 09:15:55 -0400 From: Bill Vermillion To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: A but in Zoo Message-ID: <20020814131555.GA78822@wjv.com> References: <20020814114442.GA77130@wjv.com> <20020814130031.GA58489@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020814130031.GA58489@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Organization: W.J.Vermillion / Orlando - Winter Park Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG While humming that old rock song Yackety Yacc - Dont Awk Back Erik Trulsson sang or SED something like this: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 07:44:42AM -0400, Bill Vermillion wrote: > > > Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:02:26 +0200 > > > From: > > > Subject: RE: Bug in Zoo? Or is it in ls or ffs? > > > Is this not a bug in ls or ffs as well then? > > > Regardless of what Zoo does, should not the OS remain sane? [lucretia deletia snips away] > > > Although I've never used zoo, it's probably a bug there. > > Hm. I've been using zoo since about 1989 - the old 1.x days. > > I've always had it on a system here as I had many old files > > I'd pull apart. I've used it dating back to Sys V.2's and I use > > it for working under MS things too. It works for easily > > transporting files from a multitude of OSes. > > I just checked on about 6 systems I have access to, 4.6, 4.5, 4.2 > > and a 4.0, and they all exhibit the same behaviour. I don't know > > when it changed, but the sources to zoo have not changed since > > the early 1990s, and the sources when extracted all show > > a day of May 1, 1993. > > > > So I'm suspecting that something changed in the 4.x series. > > I don't have anything prior to 4.x to check on. > > > > I've not created any zoo archives in the past couple of years but > > it used to work, and I've used it on many platforms. > > Since the code is the same and has not changed since Rahul Dhesi > > wrote the last version in 1991 - would it not stand to reason then > > that something has changed in FreeBSD since the 4.x came out. > > Could someone who has a pre 4.x system check this? > A quick investigation indicates that this is a bug in zoo. > It presumably was not exposed on earlier versions of FreeBSD. > To be more precise the function zootrunc() which can be found at the > end of the file bsd.c contains a line > seekpos = lseek(fd, 0L, SEEK_CUR); > This should be changed to > > seekpos = lseek(fd, (off_t) 0L, SEEK_CUR); > The second argument to lseek should be a 64-bit value on > FreeBSD, but here it is called with a long which is a 32-bit > value on the i386. This means that the upper 32 bits of the > argument that lseek sees will contain garbage. In this case > they always seem to have the value 0x00000001 which leads to > the observed behaviour of a sparse file with size ~4GB. That explains that. The sources date back to the era when no one was using 64-bits. I had a nagging idea that may be it - but I'm not a c-coder. Thanks. Bill -- Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 6:19:40 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F3E037B400 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 06:19:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from agape.wingnet.net (agape.wingnet.net [206.30.215.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D00E443E6A for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 06:19:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from trevarthan@wingnet.net) Received: from david.int.wingnet.net (makrothumia.wingnet.net [206.30.215.5]) by agape.wingnet.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7EDJaL07195 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 09:19:36 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from trevarthan@wingnet.net) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" From: Matthias Trevarthan Reply-To: trevarthan@wingnet.net Organization: Urokosodoji, Inc. To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: setting up a CVSup repository Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 09:19:35 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200208140919.35737.trevarthan@wingnet.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Would this be difficult? I'd like to set up a repository on ONE server for all the ports AND /usr/= src. Then I'd like my other machines to download it via cvsup just like they w= ould=20 from some machine out on the net, but with the speed of 10/100... If documentation already exists for this process, please just point me in= the=20 correct direction, and I'll read it. Thanks! Matthias To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 6:37:15 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C3AD37B400 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 06:37:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from host185.dolanmedia.com (host185.dolanmedia.com [209.98.197.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2E36F43E72 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 06:37:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from greg.panula@dolaninformation.com) Received: (qmail 51052 invoked by uid 0); 14 Aug 2002 13:37:11 -0000 Received: from greg.panula@dolaninformation.com by proxy with qmail-scanner-0.96 (. Clean. Processed in 0.417371 secs); 14 Aug 2002 13:37:11 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: greg.panula@dolaninformation.com via proxy X-Qmail-Scanner-Rcpt-To: trevarthan@wingnet.net,freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Qmail-Scanner: 0.96 (No viruses found. Processed in 0.417371 secs) Received: from unknown (HELO mail.dolanmedia.com) (10.1.1.23) by host185.dolanmedia.com with SMTP; 14 Aug 2002 13:37:10 -0000 Received: from dolaninformation.com (10.1.1.135) by mail.dolanmedia.com (Worldmail 1.3.167); 14 Aug 2002 08:37:10 -0500 Message-ID: <3D5A5D06.F79F1576@dolaninformation.com> Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:37:10 -0500 From: Greg Panula Reply-To: greg.panula@dolaninformation.com Organization: Dolan Information Center Inc X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: trevarthan@wingnet.net Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: setting up a CVSup repository References: <200208140919.35737.trevarthan@wingnet.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Matthias Trevarthan wrote: > > Would this be difficult? > > I'd like to set up a repository on ONE server for all the ports AND /usr/src. > > Then I'd like my other machines to download it via cvsup just like they would > from some machine out on the net, but with the speed of 10/100... > > If documentation already exists for this process, please just point me in the > correct direction, and I'll read it. > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/hubs/ http://www.freebsddiary.org/mirror.php http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvsup.html http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=cvsup+mirror+freebsd http://www.polstra.com/projects/freeware/CVSup/faq.html#testserver http://www.freebsddiary.org/cvsupd-server.php To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 6:40: 0 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E14C37B400; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 06:39:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sccrmhc01.attbi.com (sccrmhc01.attbi.com [204.127.202.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79A2743E72; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 06:39:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from davep@meduseld.net) Received: from baloo.meduseld.net ([66.30.120.53]) by sccrmhc01.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020814133951.VUUQ11061.sccrmhc01.attbi.com@baloo.meduseld.net>; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:39:51 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by baloo.meduseld.net (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g7EDeCBL075370; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 09:40:13 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from davep@meduseld.net) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 09:40:12 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <20020814.094012.607996225.davep@meduseld.net> To: cjc@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Request for micro patch to /etc/defaults/rc.conf From: "David A. Panariti" In-Reply-To: <20020814044905.GB7225@blossom.cjclark.org> References: <20020812.122638.115901950.davep@meduseld.net> <20020814044905.GB7225@blossom.cjclark.org> X-Attribution: davep X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on XEmacs 21.4.8 (Honest Recruiter) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >>>>> "Crist" == Crist J Clark writes: Crist> On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 12:26:38PM -0400, David A. Panariti Crist> wrote: >> In /etc/defaults/rc.conf, the variants of sendmail are started >> up with differing -L options for easy log-file >> identification. >> >> However, both sendmail_submit and regular sendmail use -L >> sm-mta. This reduces the usefulness of -L, since two variants >> use the same label. Crist> But the two do not run at the same time so there is nothing Crist> to be confused in the logs. This is not necessary. My desire was to be able to tell from the logs which one was running for debugging purposes when setting up the new sendmail system. Or if you are working on a system you didn't set up or are unfamiliar with, the unique message tag gives you more information as to what is going on. davep To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 6:53:44 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E31637B400; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 06:53:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (freebie.xs4all.nl [213.84.32.253]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4680E43E75; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 06:53:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.12.5/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g7EDrUGL001170; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 15:53:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: (from wkb@localhost) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g7EDrUJO001169; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 15:53:30 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 15:53:30 +0200 From: Wilko Bulte To: Erik Trulsson Cc: Bill Vermillion , stable@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: A but in Zoo Message-ID: <20020814155330.B1069@freebie.xs4all.nl> References: <20020814114442.GA77130@wjv.com> <20020814130031.GA58489@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020814130031.GA58489@falcon.midgard.homeip.net>; from ertr1013@student.uu.se on Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 03:00:31PM +0200 X-OS: FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE X-PGP: finger wilko@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 03:00:31PM +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote: I suppose someone needs to sendpr this one so that the port can be corrected! Wilko > On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 07:44:42AM -0400, Bill Vermillion wrote: > > > Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:02:26 +0200 > > > From: > > > Subject: RE: Bug in Zoo? Or is it in ls or ffs? > > > > > Is this not a bug in ls or ffs as well then? > > > Regardless of what Zoo does, should not the OS remain sane? > > > > > - -----Original Message----- > > > From: Michael Burke [mailto:mburke@isn.net] > > > > > On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 10:43, Danny Carroll wrote: > > > > As you can see the size is not taken up in disk space so I suspect the > > > > bug is in ls. DU, DF and the left hand column of LS looks OK. > > > > > > --output-- > > > > > Looks like you're getting a sparse file -- a large file that actually > > > takes up little space. It's created by a program seeking beyond the end > > > of the file but not writing anything (I may be off a bit, but this is > > > how I understand it). The reported size of the file is large, but it > > > doesn't take up that much space, which is why df suggests that it's not > > > significant. > > > > > Although I've never used zoo, it's probably a bug there. > > > > Hm. I've been using zoo since about 1989 - the old 1.x days. > > I've always had it on a system here as I had many old files > > I'd pull apart. I've used it dating back to Sys V.2's and I use > > it for working under MS things too. It works for easily > > transporting files from a multitude of OSes. > > > > I just checked on about 6 systems I have access to, 4.6, 4.5, 4.2 > > and a 4.0, and they all exhibit the same behaviour. I don't know > > when it changed, but the sources to zoo have not changed since > > the early 1990s, and the sources when extracted all show > > a day of May 1, 1993. > > > > So I'm suspecting that something changed in the 4.x series. > > I don't have anything prior to 4.x to check on. > > > > I've not created any zoo archives in the past couple of years but > > it used to work, and I've used it on many platforms. > > Since the code is the same and has not changed since Rahul Dhesi > > wrote the last version in 1991 - would it not stand to reason then > > that something has changed in FreeBSD since the 4.x came out. > > > > Could someone who has a pre 4.x system check this? > > A quick investigation indicates that this is a bug in zoo. > It presumably was not exposed on earlier versions of FreeBSD. > To be more precise the function zootrunc() which can be found at the > end of the file bsd.c contains a line > > seekpos = lseek(fd, 0L, SEEK_CUR); > > This should be changed to > > seekpos = lseek(fd, (off_t) 0L, SEEK_CUR); > > The second argument to lseek should be a 64-bit value on FreeBSD, but > here it is called with a long which is a 32-bit value on the i386. > This means that the upper 32 bits of the argument that lseek sees will > contain garbage. In this case they always seem to have the value > 0x00000001 which leads to the observed behaviour of a sparse file with > size ~4GB. > > > The following patch to the port should fix this problem , but I would > not be surprised if there are other, similar, bugs in zoo. Older code > often has problems with 64-bit arguments. > > cvs diff: Diffing . > cvs diff: Diffing files > Index: files/patch-aa > =================================================================== > RCS file: /ncvs/ports/archivers/zoo/files/patch-aa,v > retrieving revision 1.4 > diff -u -r1.4 patch-aa > --- files/patch-aa 24 Apr 1997 02:12:23 -0000 1.4 > +++ files/patch-aa 14 Aug 2002 12:54:52 -0000 > @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ > ! extern long lseek(); > ! long seekpos; > int fd = fileno(f); > - seekpos = lseek(fd, 0L, SEEK_CUR); > +! seekpos = lseek(fd, 0L, SEEK_CUR); > if (seekpos >= 0) > --- 96,114 ---- > /* Standard UNIX-specific file attribute routines */ > @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ > ! extern off_t lseek(); > ! off_t seekpos; > int fd = fileno(f); > - seekpos = lseek(fd, 0L, SEEK_CUR); > +! seekpos = lseek(fd, (off_t)0L, SEEK_CUR); > if (seekpos >= 0) > *** misc2.c.old Thu Aug 8 09:34:48 1991 > --- misc2.c Thu Jan 5 05:37:06 1995 > > > > > > -- > > Erik Trulsson > ertr1013@student.uu.se > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ---end of quoted text--- -- | / o / /_ _ wilko@FreeBSD.org |/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte Arnhem, the Netherlands To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 7: 3:41 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2255E37B400; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:03:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bilver.wjv.com (user38.net339.fl.sprint-hsd.net [65.40.24.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE4843E77; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:03:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bv@bilver.wjv.com) Received: from bilver.wjv.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bilver.wjv.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7EE3XOo079325; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 10:03:34 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from bv@bilver.wjv.com) Received: (from bv@localhost) by bilver.wjv.com (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g7EE3XZw079324; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 10:03:33 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 10:03:33 -0400 From: Bill Vermillion To: Wilko Bulte Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A but in Zoo Message-ID: <20020814140333.GA79287@wjv.com> References: <20020814114442.GA77130@wjv.com> <20020814130031.GA58489@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> <20020814155330.B1069@freebie.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020814155330.B1069@freebie.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Organization: W.J.Vermillion / Orlando - Winter Park Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Wilko Bulte, the prominent pundit, on Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 15:53 while half mumbling, half-witicized: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 03:00:31PM +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote: > I suppose someone needs to sendpr this one so that the port can be > corrected! I just sent email to Eric asking about what looked like to me an error in the patch. He did post his reply to the ports group too, but it's only been about 10-15 minutes since I sent the email. I'm waiting his response before I attempt to remake zoo. Bill -- Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 7: 4: 3 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4639137B400 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:04:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blackhelicopters.org (geburah.blackhelicopters.org [209.69.178.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC81D43E65 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:04:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org) Received: from blackhelicopters.org (mwlucas@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by blackhelicopters.org (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g7EE40cC087338; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 10:04:00 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org) Received: (from mwlucas@localhost) by blackhelicopters.org (8.12.4/8.12.4/Submit) id g7EE40X4087337; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 10:04:00 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 10:03:59 -0400 From: Michael Lucas To: Matthias Trevarthan Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: setting up a CVSup repository Message-ID: <20020814100359.A87314@blackhelicopters.org> References: <200208140919.35737.trevarthan@wingnet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200208140919.35737.trevarthan@wingnet.net>; from trevarthan@wingnet.net on Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 09:19:35AM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 09:19:35AM -0400, Matthias Trevarthan wrote: > I'd like to set up a repository on ONE server for all the ports AND /usr/src. > > Then I'd like my other machines to download it via cvsup just like they would > from some machine out on the net, but with the speed of 10/100... Doing *exactly* this, and why it's desirable for reasons other than connection speed: http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2001/08/30/Big_Scary_Daemons.html ==ml -- Michael Lucas mwlucas@FreeBSD.org, mwlucas@BlackHelicopters.org http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/q/Big_Scary_Daemons Absolute BSD: http://www.AbsoluteBSD.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 7: 5:31 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0850137B400 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:05:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tp.databus.com (p70-227.acedsl.com [66.114.70.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A6A143E75 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:05:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from barney@databus.com) Received: from databus.com (localhost.databus.com [127.0.0.1]) by tp.databus.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7EE5QXr029310; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 10:05:26 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from barney@databus.com) Received: (from barney@localhost) by databus.com (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g7EE5Qu6029309; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 10:05:26 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 10:05:26 -0400 From: Barney Wolff To: Matthias Trevarthan Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: setting up a CVSup repository Message-ID: <20020814140526.GA29078@tp.databus.com> References: <200208140919.35737.trevarthan@wingnet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200208140919.35737.trevarthan@wingnet.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This can be done, as another poster has indicated. But it may be too much effort for what you want to accomplish. There are multiple ways to administer a collection of FreeBSD systems without having each one do its own cvsup: 1. As you asked, set up your own cvsup mirror. It seems to me that this is the way to go only if the systems that will be using it are not under your direct supervision. 2. Do cvsup of the cvs archive on one machine, then have others do their own remote CVS checkouts from the archive on that. This is simpler in some ways on the server, and really no harder on the clients. It allows you to build current and stable and cpu flavors, as you wish. 3. cvsup on one machine, build on that, and have all the others NFS mount /usr/src, /usr/obj and /usr/ports. This has the feature that you control which version is in use and saves a lot of time on all the client machines. It is clearly the way to go if all the machines are under your supervision and you're willing to build stuff that will run on all your cputypes - the optimizations available for each type are really minor within the x86 family so the loss of the last inch of performance is worth the generality, imho. I build separate kernels for each x86 flavor but a common world. I actually do #2 but only do the checkout on the local machine and build there. On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 09:19:35AM -0400, Matthias Trevarthan wrote: > I'd like to set up a repository on ONE server for all the ports AND /usr/src. > > Then I'd like my other machines to download it via cvsup just like they would > from some machine out on the net, but with the speed of 10/100... -- Barney Wolff I'm available by contract or FT: http://www.databus.com/bwresume.pdf To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 7:12: 3 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8092337B400 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:11:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.comcast.net (smtp.comcast.net [24.153.64.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 202F743E72 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:11:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from idnopheq@comcast.net) Received: from roshomon (pcp01167952pcs.roylok01.mi.comcast.net [68.62.17.63]) by mtaout06.icomcast.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 0.8 (built May 13 2002)) with ESMTP id <0H0U00IAI7DNKU@mtaout06.icomcast.net> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 10:10:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 10:09:04 -0400 From: "Coffin, Dexter" Subject: make buildworld failed for alpha -STABLE in contrib/gcc/toplev.c To: Stable Message-id: <1029334145.422.8.camel@roshomon.idnopheq.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.7 Content-type: text/plain Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, All! I CVSuped source this morning at 8:00 AM EDT. I received the following when I executed 'make buildworld' ... cc -O -pipe -mcpu=ev56 -DIN_GCC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DPREFIX=\"/usr/obj/usr/src/alph a/usr\" -DHAIFA -DFORCE_OPTIMIZATION_DOWNGRADE=yes -I/usr/obj/usr/src/alpha/usr/ src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../cc_tools -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../cc_too ls -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../../../../contrib/gcc -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.b in/cc/cc_int/../../../../contrib/gcc/config -DTARGET_NAME=\"alpha-unknown-freebs d\" -DIN_GCC -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -c /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../../../../c ontrib/gcc/toplev.c -o toplev.o /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../../../../contrib/gcc/toplev.c:4878: warning: # warning FORCE_OPTIMIZATION_DOWNGRADE /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../../../../contrib/gcc/toplev.c: In function `ma in': /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../../../../contrib/gcc/toplev.c:4879: `yes' unde clared (first use in this function) /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../../../../contrib/gcc/toplev.c:4879: (Each unde clared identifier is reported only once /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../../../../contrib/gcc/toplev.c:4879: for each f unction it appears in.) *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. Here's my uname -a ... FreeBSD roshomon.idnopheq.net 4.6-RC FreeBSD 4.6-RC #3: Mon May 27 03:47:48 EDT 2002 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ROSHOMON alpha I followed the handbook instructions and read UPDATING prior to buildworld. I can provide my make.conf, kernel config file, and the make buildworld output upon request. Thoughts? Recommendations? Advice? Thanks! -- "Drawing on my fine command of language, I said nothing." - advice I should take more often http://idnopheq.perlmonk.org idnopheq@NOSPAM.perlmonk.org http://idnopheq.dns2go.com idnopheq@NOSPAM.comcast.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 7:27: 4 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 513ED37B400 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:27:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blackhelicopters.org (geburah.blackhelicopters.org [209.69.178.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C78E643E3B for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:26:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org) Received: from blackhelicopters.org (mwlucas@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by blackhelicopters.org (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g7EEQxcC087521; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 10:26:59 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org) Received: (from mwlucas@localhost) by blackhelicopters.org (8.12.4/8.12.4/Submit) id g7EEQxND087520; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 10:26:59 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 10:26:59 -0400 From: Michael Lucas To: Barney Wolff Cc: Matthias Trevarthan , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: setting up a CVSup repository Message-ID: <20020814102659.A87482@blackhelicopters.org> References: <200208140919.35737.trevarthan@wingnet.net> <20020814140526.GA29078@tp.databus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020814140526.GA29078@tp.databus.com>; from barney@tp.databus.com on Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 10:05:26AM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG If all of your servers are identical, you can certainly do the NFS mount method described below. That's absolutely preferable for *most* people. If you need different make options on the various machines, though, that's not that useful. You can build multiple worlds with different make options, but that may be more trouble than building locally. In some environments, you cannot use NFS mounts across the firewalls between application tiers. A central cvsup server is quite useful there. Also, if you're in an enterprise setting, each version of the code must separately pass QA. If you cvsup each server separately, this is bad. (I've been in a situation before where one server crashed, while all the others didn't. The problem turned out to be slight differences in the version of -stable I was running at the time. Tracking that down was utter hell. That's my motivation for using a central cvsup server. :-) ==ml On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 10:05:26AM -0400, Barney Wolff wrote: > This can be done, as another poster has indicated. But it may be too > much effort for what you want to accomplish. There are multiple ways > to administer a collection of FreeBSD systems without having each one > do its own cvsup: > > 1. As you asked, set up your own cvsup mirror. It seems to me that > this is the way to go only if the systems that will be using it are > not under your direct supervision. > > 2. Do cvsup of the cvs archive on one machine, then have others do > their own remote CVS checkouts from the archive on that. This is simpler > in some ways on the server, and really no harder on the clients. It > allows you to build current and stable and cpu flavors, as you wish. > > 3. cvsup on one machine, build on that, and have all the others > NFS mount /usr/src, /usr/obj and /usr/ports. This has the feature > that you control which version is in use and saves a lot of time on > all the client machines. It is clearly the way to go if all the > machines are under your supervision and you're willing to build > stuff that will run on all your cputypes - the optimizations available > for each type are really minor within the x86 family so the loss > of the last inch of performance is worth the generality, imho. I > build separate kernels for each x86 flavor but a common world. > > I actually do #2 but only do the checkout on the local machine and > build there. > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 09:19:35AM -0400, Matthias Trevarthan wrote: > > I'd like to set up a repository on ONE server for all the ports AND /usr/src. > > > > Then I'd like my other machines to download it via cvsup just like they would > > from some machine out on the net, but with the speed of 10/100... > > -- > Barney Wolff > I'm available by contract or FT: http://www.databus.com/bwresume.pdf > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Michael Lucas mwlucas@FreeBSD.org, mwlucas@BlackHelicopters.org http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/q/Big_Scary_Daemons Absolute BSD: http://www.AbsoluteBSD.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 7:32:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5018037B401 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:32:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from agape.wingnet.net (agape.wingnet.net [206.30.215.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9793443E75 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:32:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from trevarthan@wingnet.net) Received: from david.int.wingnet.net (makrothumia.wingnet.net [206.30.215.5]) by agape.wingnet.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7EEW5L13972 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 10:32:05 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from trevarthan@wingnet.net) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Matthias Trevarthan Reply-To: trevarthan@wingnet.net Organization: Urokosodoji, Inc. To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: setting up a CVSup repository Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 10:32:04 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.2 References: <200208140919.35737.trevarthan@wingnet.net> <20020814140526.GA29078@tp.databus.com> In-Reply-To: <20020814140526.GA29078@tp.databus.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200208141032.04447.trevarthan@wingnet.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wednesday 14 August 2002 10:05 am, Barney Wolff wrote: > This can be done, as another poster has indicated. But it may be too > much effort for what you want to accomplish. There are multiple ways > to administer a collection of FreeBSD systems without having each one > do its own cvsup: > Nope. This is exactly what I want.=20 > 1. As you asked, set up your own cvsup mirror. It seems to me that > this is the way to go only if the systems that will be using it are > not under your direct supervision. > > 2. Do cvsup of the cvs archive on one machine, then have others do > their own remote CVS checkouts from the archive on that. This is simpl= er > in some ways on the server, and really no harder on the clients. It > allows you to build current and stable and cpu flavors, as you wish. > I'm a little confused about the differences between one and two. Could yo= u=20 elaborate?=20 > 3. cvsup on one machine, build on that, and have all the others > NFS mount /usr/src, /usr/obj and /usr/ports. This has the feature > that you control which version is in use and saves a lot of time on > all the client machines. It is clearly the way to go if all the > machines are under your supervision and you're willing to build > stuff that will run on all your cputypes - the optimizations available > for each type are really minor within the x86 family so the loss > of the last inch of performance is worth the generality, imho. I > build separate kernels for each x86 flavor but a common world. > I'm not real fond of NFS. We have a somewhat distributed network, with=20 multiple server rooms connected by T1s. They're all under my administrati= on,=20 but I think running CVSup on each machine is fairly ideal. UNIX machines=20 multitask pretty well, and it only takes about two hours to make buildwor= ld=20 on my beefy servers.=20 I may do this within server rooms though.. Have one master server downloa= d and=20 build the world in each room, then distribute via NFS inside each room...= =20 Don't know. I'll have to think about it. > I actually do #2 but only do the checkout on the local machine and > build there. Again, how does this differ from #1? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 7:40:59 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89B7137B400 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:40:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (freebie.xs4all.nl [213.84.32.253]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 518A043E81 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:40:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.12.5/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g7EEeoGL001355; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 16:40:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: (from wkb@localhost) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g7EEeo4T001354; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 16:40:50 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 16:40:50 +0200 From: Wilko Bulte To: "Coffin, Dexter" Cc: Stable Subject: Re: make buildworld failed for alpha -STABLE in contrib/gcc/toplev.c Message-ID: <20020814164050.A1337@freebie.xs4all.nl> References: <1029334145.422.8.camel@roshomon.idnopheq.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <1029334145.422.8.camel@roshomon.idnopheq.net>; from idnopheq@comcast.net on Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 10:09:04AM -0400 X-OS: FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE X-PGP: finger wilko@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 10:09:04AM -0400, Coffin, Dexter wrote: I had that some time ago. Nuking /usr/src and checking out a fresh copy made buildworld succeed. Wilko > Hi, All! > > I CVSuped source this morning at 8:00 AM EDT. > > I received the following when I executed 'make buildworld' ... > > > > cc -O -pipe -mcpu=ev56 -DIN_GCC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H > -DPREFIX=\"/usr/obj/usr/src/alph > a/usr\" -DHAIFA -DFORCE_OPTIMIZATION_DOWNGRADE=yes > -I/usr/obj/usr/src/alpha/usr/ > src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../cc_tools > -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../cc_too > ls -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../../../../contrib/gcc > -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.b > in/cc/cc_int/../../../../contrib/gcc/config > -DTARGET_NAME=\"alpha-unknown-freebs > d\" -DIN_GCC -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -c > /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../../../../c > ontrib/gcc/toplev.c -o toplev.o > /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../../../../contrib/gcc/toplev.c:4878: > warning: # > warning FORCE_OPTIMIZATION_DOWNGRADE > /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../../../../contrib/gcc/toplev.c: In > function `ma > in': > /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../../../../contrib/gcc/toplev.c:4879: > `yes' unde > clared (first use in this function) > /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../../../../contrib/gcc/toplev.c:4879: > (Each unde > clared identifier is reported only once > /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../../../../contrib/gcc/toplev.c:4879: > for each f > unction it appears in.) > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > > > > Here's my uname -a ... > > FreeBSD roshomon.idnopheq.net 4.6-RC FreeBSD 4.6-RC #3: Mon May 27 > 03:47:48 EDT 2002 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ROSHOMON alpha > > I followed the handbook instructions and read UPDATING prior to > buildworld. > > I can provide my make.conf, kernel config file, and the make buildworld > output upon request. > > Thoughts? Recommendations? Advice? > > Thanks! > -- > "Drawing on my fine command of language, I said nothing." > - advice I should take more often > http://idnopheq.perlmonk.org idnopheq@NOSPAM.perlmonk.org > http://idnopheq.dns2go.com idnopheq@NOSPAM.comcast.net > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ---end of quoted text--- -- | / o / /_ _ wilko@FreeBSD.org |/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte Arnhem, the Netherlands To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 8:14:34 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DF2137B400; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:14:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hamberg.it.uu.se (hamberg.it.uu.se [130.238.9.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2DF943E6A; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:14:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ertr1013@csd.uu.se) Received: (from ertr1013@localhost) by hamberg.it.uu.se (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA01886; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 17:14:24 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 17:14:24 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson To: Bill Vermillion Cc: Wilko Bulte , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re: A but in Zoo Message-ID: <20020814171424.B26387@student.uu.se> References: <20020814114442.GA77130@wjv.com> <20020814130031.GA58489@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> <20020814155330.B1069@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20020814140333.GA79287@wjv.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020814140333.GA79287@wjv.com>; from bv@wjv.com on Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 10:03:33AM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 10:03:33AM -0400, Bill Vermillion wrote: > Wilko Bulte, the prominent pundit, on Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 15:53 > while half mumbling, half-witicized: > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 03:00:31PM +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote: > > > > I suppose someone needs to sendpr this one so that the port can be > > corrected! > > I just sent email to Eric asking about what looked like to me > an error in the patch. He did post his reply to the ports group > too, but it's only been about 10-15 minutes since I sent the email. > > I'm waiting his response before I attempt to remake zoo. As I said in my response to you, it is no error in my patch. It's just that a patch to a patch looks a bit strange. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 8:17: 6 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71CA237B400 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:17:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.qc.uunet.ca (mail2.qc.uunet.ca [198.168.54.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41D5043E77 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:17:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from anarcat@anarcat.ath.cx) Received: from xtanbul (IDENT:506@[216.94.147.34]) by mail2.qc.uunet.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA29799 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:16:56 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:06:38 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v482) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: read-only installworld broken? From: Antoine Beaupre To: stable@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <6E6628BC-AF97-11D6-A7EC-0050E4A0BB3F@anarcat.ath.cx> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.482) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Anyone seen this? ===> gnu/usr.bin/perl/library/SDBM_File cd sdbm && make all rm -rf libsdbm.a rm: libsdbm.a: Read-only file system A. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 8:17:50 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C9437B400 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:17:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (freebie.xs4all.nl [213.84.32.253]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD9B943E42 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:17:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.12.5/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g7EFHiGL001484; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 17:17:45 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: (from wkb@localhost) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g7EFHiWW001483; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 17:17:44 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 17:17:44 +0200 From: Wilko Bulte To: Andrea Monaldi Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Installing on ATI video card laptop Message-ID: <20020814171744.B1337@freebie.xs4all.nl> References: <20020813205216.47311.qmail@web21501.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020813205216.47311.qmail@web21501.mail.yahoo.com>; from magic_mac_96@yahoo.com on Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 01:52:16PM -0700 X-OS: FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE X-PGP: finger wilko@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 01:52:16PM -0700, Andrea Monaldi wrote: > Hi All, > > I am trying to install 4.6 release on a Compaq laptop > with an ATI Rage Mobility video card. > > It seems there's no driver at all for the ATI familiy. > Is it true? No. I have a Compaq laptop with a slightly different ATI (Radeon Mobility) that works fine with stable. See http://www.freebsd.org/~wilko/Evo/n160.html -- | / o / /_ _ wilko@FreeBSD.org |/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte Arnhem, the Netherlands To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 8:20:23 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A295A37B401 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:20:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sccrmhc02.attbi.com (sccrmhc02.attbi.com [204.127.202.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0DCD43E42 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:20:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah@employees.org) Received: from bmah.dyndns.org ([12.233.149.189]) by sccrmhc02.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020814152018.YEBG13899.sccrmhc02.attbi.com@bmah.dyndns.org>; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 15:20:18 +0000 Received: from intruder.bmah.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by bmah.dyndns.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7EFKH89038338; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:20:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah@intruder.bmah.org) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by intruder.bmah.org (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g7EFKDNU038337; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:20:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200208141520.g7EFKDNU038337@intruder.bmah.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5+ 20020729 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Antoine Beaupre Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: read-only installworld broken? In-Reply-To: <6E6628BC-AF97-11D6-A7EC-0050E4A0BB3F@anarcat.ath.cx> References: <6E6628BC-AF97-11D6-A7EC-0050E4A0BB3F@anarcat.ath.cx> Comments: In-reply-to Antoine Beaupre message dated "Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:06:38 -0400." From: "Bruce A. Mah" Reply-To: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A 2V%N&+ X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-923579233P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:20:13 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --==_Exmh_-923579233P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii If memory serves me right, Antoine Beaupre wrote: > Anyone seen this? > > ===> gnu/usr.bin/perl/library/SDBM_File > cd sdbm && make all > rm -rf libsdbm.a > rm: libsdbm.a: Read-only file system The Perl build process is a little picky about timestamps on files. I've seen this happen when I've forgotten to do "adjkerntz -i" before an installworld. Bruce. --==_Exmh_-923579233P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.5+ 20020506 iD8DBQE9WnUt2MoxcVugUsMRAv1tAKCl1P8zsMqXgmjGHYosVMcwoYQKiACg7XD2 dgF7qBUtYG1QMV9M395s2sM= =aZrq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_-923579233P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 8:27:17 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6B0437B400; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:27:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.qc.uunet.ca (mail2.qc.uunet.ca [198.168.54.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC44443E42; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:27:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from anarcat@anarcat.ath.cx) Received: from xtanbul (IDENT:506@[216.94.147.34]) by mail2.qc.uunet.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA30209; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:27:05 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:16:48 -0400 Subject: Re: read-only installworld broken? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v482) Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG To: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG From: Antoine Beaupre In-Reply-To: <200208141520.g7EFKDNU038337@intruder.bmah.org> Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.482) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wednesday, August 14, 2002, at 11:20 AM, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > If memory serves me right, Antoine Beaupre wrote: >> Anyone seen this? >> >> ===> gnu/usr.bin/perl/library/SDBM_File >> cd sdbm && make all >> rm -rf libsdbm.a >> rm: libsdbm.a: Read-only file system > > The Perl build process is a little picky about timestamps on files. > I've seen this happen when I've forgotten to do "adjkerntz -i" before an > installworld. Hmm... This is an installworld on a machine running multi-user, with the clock set to UTC, so I doubt this would be an issue. What's more, re-installing world fixed the problem (!?). non-issue, I guess. ;) A. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 8:41:53 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E04337B400 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:41:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web13002.mail.yahoo.com (web13002.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.174.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 52F9A43E6E for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:41:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from niteskyguy@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20020814154147.65845.qmail@web13002.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [207.43.191.130] by web13002.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:41:47 PDT Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:41:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Kite Subject: make installworld fails To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I am trying to upgrade from 4.6-RELEASE to 4.6-STABLE. Cvsup, buildworld, buildkernel and installkernel all went fine (as far as I know). When I try to do installworld, I get the message "touch: not found". Touch is in my path and runs fine. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. I have been trying for days to get this done, running into first one problem then another. Thanks, Doug Following is the output of installworld: # make installworld mkdir -p /tmp/install.455 for prog in [ awk cat chflags chmod chown date echo egrep find grep ln make makewhatis mtree mv perl pwd_mkdb rm sed sh sysctl test true uname wc zic; do cp `which $prog` /tmp/install.455; done cd /usr/src; MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj MACHINE_ARCH=i386 MACHINE=i386 OBJFORMAT_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/libexec PERL5LIB=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/libdata/perl/5.00503 GROFF_BIN_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/bin GROFF_FONT_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/share/groff_font GROFF_TMAC_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/share/tmac PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/games:/tmp/install.455 make -f Makefile.inc1 reinstall -------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Making hierarchy -------------------------------------------------------------- cd /usr/src; make -f Makefile.inc1 hierarchy cd /usr/src/etc; make distrib-dirs set - `grep "^[a-zA-Z]" /usr/src/etc/locale.deprecated`; while [ $# -gt 0 ] ; do for dir in /usr/share/locale /usr/share/nls /usr/local/share/nls; do test -d /${dir} && cd /${dir}; test -L "$2" && rm -rf "$2"; test \! -L "$1" && test -d "$1" && mv "$1" "$2"; done; shift; shift; done mtree -deU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.root.dist -p / mtree -deU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.var.dist -p /var mtree -deU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.usr.dist -p /usr mtree -deU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.include.dist -p /usr/include mtree -deU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.include.dist -p /usr/libdata/perl/5.00503/mach mtree -deU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.sendmail.dist -p / cd /; rm -f /sys; ln -s usr/src/sys sys cd /usr/share/man/en.ISO8859-1; ln -sf ../man* . cd /usr/share/man; set - `grep "^[a-zA-Z]" /usr/src/etc/man.alias`; while [ $# -gt 0 ] ; do rm -rf "$1"; ln -s "$2" "$1"; shift; shift; done cd /usr/share/locale; set - `grep "^[a-zA-Z]" /usr/src/etc/locale.alias`; while [ $# -gt 0 ] ; do rm -rf "$1"; ln -s "$2" "$1"; shift; shift; done cd /usr/share/nls; set - `grep "^[a-zA-Z]" /usr/src/etc/nls.alias`; while [ $# -gt 0 ] ; do rm -rf "$1"; ln -s "$2" "$1"; shift; shift; done -------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Installing everything.. -------------------------------------------------------------- cd /usr/src; make -f Makefile.inc1 install ===> share/info ===> include creating osreldate.h from newvers.sh setvar PARAMFILE /usr/src/include/../sys/sys/param.h; . /usr/src/include/../sys/conf/newvers.sh; echo "$COPYRIGHT" > osreldate.h; echo "#ifdef _KERNEL" >> osreldate.h; echo '#error "osreldate.h must not be used in the kernel, use sys/param.h"' >> osreldate.h; echo "#else" >> osreldate.h; echo \#'undef __FreeBSD_version' >> osreldate.h; echo \#'define __FreeBSD_version' $RELDATE >> osreldate.h; echo "#endif" >> osreldate.h touch: not found *** Error code 127 Stop in /usr/src/include. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs http://www.hotjobs.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 9:24:18 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B413A37B427 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 09:24:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.comcast.net (smtp.comcast.net [24.153.64.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A66E43E4A for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 09:24:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from idnopheq@comcast.net) Received: from roshomon (pcp01167952pcs.roylok01.mi.comcast.net [68.62.17.63]) by mtaout01.icomcast.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 0.8 (built May 13 2002)) with ESMTP id <0H0U00B40DK38F@mtaout01.icomcast.net> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 12:24:04 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 12:22:32 -0400 From: "Coffin, Dexter" Subject: Re: make buildworld failed for alpha -STABLE in contrib/gcc/toplev.c In-reply-to: <20020814164050.A1337@freebie.xs4all.nl> To: Stable Message-id: <1029342153.420.3.camel@roshomon.idnopheq.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.7 Content-type: text/plain Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <1029334145.422.8.camel@roshomon.idnopheq.net> <20020814164050.A1337@freebie.xs4all.nl> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, All! I followed Wilko's (THX!) advice and 'rm -rf'-ed the /usr/src directory and re-CVSup-ed at about 11:30 AM EDT. Results reflected my notes below. There was no change. Any additional thoughts, comments, or advice? TIA! On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 10:40, Wilko Bulte wrote: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 10:09:04AM -0400, Coffin, Dexter wrote: > > I had that some time ago. Nuking /usr/src and checking out > a fresh copy made buildworld succeed. > > Wilko > > > Hi, All! > > > > I CVSuped source this morning at 8:00 AM EDT. > > > > I received the following when I executed 'make buildworld' ... > > > > > > > > cc -O -pipe -mcpu=ev56 -DIN_GCC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H > > -DPREFIX=\"/usr/obj/usr/src/alph > > a/usr\" -DHAIFA -DFORCE_OPTIMIZATION_DOWNGRADE=yes > > -I/usr/obj/usr/src/alpha/usr/ > > src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../cc_tools > > -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../cc_too > > ls -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../../../../contrib/gcc > > -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.b > > in/cc/cc_int/../../../../contrib/gcc/config > > -DTARGET_NAME=\"alpha-unknown-freebs > > d\" -DIN_GCC -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -c > > /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../../../../c > > ontrib/gcc/toplev.c -o toplev.o > > /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../../../../contrib/gcc/toplev.c:4878: > > warning: # > > warning FORCE_OPTIMIZATION_DOWNGRADE > > /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../../../../contrib/gcc/toplev.c: In > > function `ma > > in': > > /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../../../../contrib/gcc/toplev.c:4879: > > `yes' unde > > clared (first use in this function) > > /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../../../../contrib/gcc/toplev.c:4879: > > (Each unde > > clared identifier is reported only once > > /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../../../../contrib/gcc/toplev.c:4879: > > for each f > > unction it appears in.) > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/src. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/src. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/src. > > > > > > > > Here's my uname -a ... > > > > FreeBSD roshomon.idnopheq.net 4.6-RC FreeBSD 4.6-RC #3: Mon May 27 > > 03:47:48 EDT 2002 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ROSHOMON alpha > > > > I followed the handbook instructions and read UPDATING prior to > > buildworld. > > > > I can provide my make.conf, kernel config file, and the make buildworld > > output upon request. > > > > Thoughts? Recommendations? Advice? > > > > Thanks! > > -- > > "Drawing on my fine command of language, I said nothing." > > - advice I should take more often > > http://idnopheq.perlmonk.org idnopheq@NOSPAM.perlmonk.org > > http://idnopheq.dns2go.com idnopheq@NOSPAM.comcast.net > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > ---end of quoted text--- > > -- > | / o / /_ _ wilko@FreeBSD.org > |/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte Arnhem, the Netherlands > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- "Drawing on my fine command of language, I said nothing." - advice I should take more often http://idnopheq.perlmonk.org idnopheq@NOSPAM.perlmonk.org http://idnopheq.dns2go.com idnopheq@NOSPAM.comcast.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 9:40:34 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD34F37B400; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 09:40:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (whale.sunbay.crimea.ua [212.110.138.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1550843E3B; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 09:40:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ru@whale.sunbay.crimea.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (8.11.6/8.11.2) id g7EGe9n54903; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 19:40:09 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 19:40:09 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Antoine Beaupre Cc: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: read-only installworld broken? Message-ID: <20020814164009.GA54040@sunbay.com> References: <200208141520.g7EFKDNU038337@intruder.bmah.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 11:16:48AM -0400, Antoine Beaupre wrote: >=20 > On Wednesday, August 14, 2002, at 11:20 AM, Bruce A. Mah wrote: >=20 > >If memory serves me right, Antoine Beaupre wrote: > >>Anyone seen this? > >> > >>=3D=3D=3D> gnu/usr.bin/perl/library/SDBM_File > >>cd sdbm && make all > >>rm -rf libsdbm.a > >>rm: libsdbm.a: Read-only file system > > > >The Perl build process is a little picky about timestamps on files. > >I've seen this happen when I've forgotten to do "adjkerntz -i" before an > >installworld. >=20 > Hmm... This is an installworld on a machine running multi-user, with the= =20 > clock set to UTC, so I doubt this would be an issue. >=20 > What's more, re-installing world fixed the problem (!?). >=20 > non-issue, I guess. ;) >=20 This this definitely was a time issue. make(1) heavily depends on a correct time being set during build/install. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9WofpUkv4P6juNwoRAkU/AJwM3MX+Ajw+ufkMJKAZ/5qrFQxLsgCfTVzJ 2HOZlcJBOdohFGVGEj+BFJo= =CFgy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 9:46:20 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 975DA37B400 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 09:46:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (whale.sunbay.crimea.ua [212.110.138.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEE2F43E7B for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 09:46:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ru@whale.sunbay.crimea.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (8.11.6/8.11.2) id g7EGk0w55662; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 19:46:00 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 19:46:00 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Doug Kite Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: make installworld fails Message-ID: <20020814164600.GB54040@sunbay.com> References: <20020814154147.65845.qmail@web13002.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="E39vaYmALEf/7YXx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020814154147.65845.qmail@web13002.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --E39vaYmALEf/7YXx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable CHECK YOUR TIME, CHECK YOUR TIME, CHECK YOUR TIME!!! This is actually a FAQ question. make(1) attempts to build during the install which it is not supposed to be doing. This might be a cause if you rebooted into single-user with the new kernel and forgot to run adjkerntz -i. On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 08:41:47AM -0700, Doug Kite wrote: > I am trying to upgrade from 4.6-RELEASE to 4.6-STABLE. >=20 > Cvsup, buildworld, buildkernel and installkernel all > went fine (as far as I know). >=20 > When I try to do installworld, I get the message > "touch: not found". Touch is in my path and runs fine. >=20 > Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. I have been > trying for days to get this done, running into first > one problem then another.=20 >=20 > Thanks, > Doug >=20 > Following is the output of installworld: > # make installworld > mkdir -p /tmp/install.455 > for prog in [ awk cat chflags chmod chown date echo > egrep find grep ln make makewhatis mtree mv perl > pwd_mkdb rm sed sh sysctl test true uname wc zic; do=20 > cp `which $prog` /tmp/install.455; done > cd /usr/src; MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=3D/usr/obj=20 > MACHINE_ARCH=3Di386 MACHINE=3Di386=20 > OBJFORMAT_PATH=3D/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/libexec=20 > PERL5LIB=3D/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/libdata/perl/5.00503 > GROFF_BIN_PATH=3D/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/bin=20 > GROFF_FONT_PATH=3D/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/share/groff_font > GROFF_TMAC_PATH=3D/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/share/tmac=20 > PATH=3D/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/bin:/usr/= obj/usr/src/i386/usr/games:/tmp/install.455 > make -f Makefile.inc1 reinstall > -------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> Making hierarchy > -------------------------------------------------------------- > cd /usr/src; make -f Makefile.inc1 hierarchy > cd /usr/src/etc; make distrib-dirs > set - `grep "^[a-zA-Z]" > /usr/src/etc/locale.deprecated`; while [ $# -gt 0 ] ; > do for dir in /usr/share/locale /usr/share/nls=20 > /usr/local/share/nls; do test -d /${dir} && cd > /${dir}; test -L "$2" && rm -rf "$2"; test \! -L > "$1" && test -d "$1" && mv "$1" "$2"; done; shift; > shift; done > mtree -deU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.root.dist -p / > mtree -deU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.var.dist -p /var > mtree -deU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.usr.dist -p /usr > mtree -deU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.include.dist -p > /usr/include > mtree -deU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.include.dist -p > /usr/libdata/perl/5.00503/mach > mtree -deU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.sendmail.dist -p > / > cd /; rm -f /sys; ln -s usr/src/sys sys > cd /usr/share/man/en.ISO8859-1; ln -sf ../man* . > cd /usr/share/man; set - `grep "^[a-zA-Z]" > /usr/src/etc/man.alias`; while [ $# -gt 0 ] ; do rm > -rf "$1"; ln -s "$2" "$1"; shift; shift; done > cd /usr/share/locale; set - `grep "^[a-zA-Z]" > /usr/src/etc/locale.alias`; while [ $# -gt 0 ] ; do=20 > rm -rf "$1"; ln -s "$2" "$1"; shift; shift; done > cd /usr/share/nls; set - `grep "^[a-zA-Z]" > /usr/src/etc/nls.alias`; while [ $# -gt 0 ] ; do rm > -rf "$1"; ln -s "$2" "$1"; shift; shift; done >=20 > -------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> Installing everything.. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > cd /usr/src; make -f Makefile.inc1 install > =3D=3D=3D> share/info > =3D=3D=3D> include > creating osreldate.h from newvers.sh > setvar PARAMFILE /usr/src/include/../sys/sys/param.h;=20 > . /usr/src/include/../sys/conf/newvers.sh; echo > "$COPYRIGHT" > osreldate.h; echo "#ifdef _KERNEL" > >> osreldate.h; echo '#error "osreldate.h must not > be used in the kernel, use sys/param.h"' >> > osreldate.h; echo "#else" >> osreldate.h; echo > \#'undef __FreeBSD_version' >> osreldate.h; echo > \#'define __FreeBSD_version' $RELDATE >> osreldate.h;=20 > echo "#endif" >> osreldate.h > touch: not found > *** Error code 127 >=20 > Stop in /usr/src/include. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/src. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age --E39vaYmALEf/7YXx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9WolIUkv4P6juNwoRAm9nAJ9YH8arDXNaZJjaXoNjBLFkNtM2/wCdHJ9T CuX7IAWQMc4P1E63G6ewOCg= =jlqj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --E39vaYmALEf/7YXx-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 9:54:57 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DAC937B401 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 09:54:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tp.databus.com (p70-227.acedsl.com [66.114.70.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A636643E77 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 09:54:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from barney@databus.com) Received: from databus.com (localhost.databus.com [127.0.0.1]) by tp.databus.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7EGsqXr030909; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 12:54:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from barney@databus.com) Received: (from barney@localhost) by databus.com (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g7EGsqxj030908; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 12:54:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 12:54:52 -0400 From: Barney Wolff To: Matthias Trevarthan Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: setting up a CVSup repository Message-ID: <20020814165452.GA30493@tp.databus.com> References: <200208140919.35737.trevarthan@wingnet.net> <20020814140526.GA29078@tp.databus.com> <200208141032.04447.trevarthan@wingnet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200208141032.04447.trevarthan@wingnet.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG cvs can do checkouts from a remote archive - see the manpage or other docs. The advantage of running that way is you don't need to learn about the cvsup daemon and the clients can look at any version of any file, whenever they want to, without having to cvsup a whole collection. cvsup's real advantage in efficiency counts for a lot over the Internet, not so much over a LAN. As cvs can use ssh for its remote operations, you don't have to be worried about NFS (or rsh). But really, you should not be keeping your cvs archive, or cvsup mirror, outside the firewall. A compromise of the machine that holds your organization's OS sources would be an utter disaster that you might not detect for a long time, if ever - or you might hear about it first in the newspaper. However, if your organization has multiple levels of firewalls with internal areas of differing security context, cvsup may be an easier sell to the firewall gods than ssh or nfs. Re ports, remember that what cvsup (or cvs) gives you is the port skeleton, not the distribution files. So you should think about setting up a way for those to be downloaded from their often-overloaded sources just once. Running an http/ftp proxy would seem wise, if you really want multiple systems building ports. On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 10:32:04AM -0400, Matthias Trevarthan wrote: > > > 1. As you asked, set up your own cvsup mirror. It seems to me that > > this is the way to go only if the systems that will be using it are > > not under your direct supervision. > > > > 2. Do cvsup of the cvs archive on one machine, then have others do > > their own remote CVS checkouts from the archive on that. This is simpler > > in some ways on the server, and really no harder on the clients. It > > allows you to build current and stable and cpu flavors, as you wish. > > > > I'm a little confused about the differences between one and two. Could you > elaborate? -- Barney Wolff I'm available by contract or FT: http://www.databus.com/bwresume.pdf To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 11: 4:28 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C58137B400 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:04:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nova.fnal.gov (nova.fnal.gov [131.225.121.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4154943E75 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:04:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from zingelman@fnal.gov) Received: from localhost (tez@localhost) by nova.fnal.gov (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7EI4Gx24125; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:04:17 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: nova.fnal.gov: tez owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:04:16 -0500 (CDT) From: Tim Zingelman X-X-Sender: tez@nova.fnal.gov Reply-To: Tim Zingelman To: "Evgueni V. Gavrilov" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: gotcha with OpenSSH 3.4 and PrivilegeSeparation In-Reply-To: <3D59F5A7.70607@rshb.com.ru> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Evgueni V. Gavrilov wrote: > I noticed a gotcha in OpenSSH 3.4 with privilege separation turned on. > > Upon loosing of remote client unprivileged process of sshd doesn't die. > I tried to vary KeepAlive and/or ClientAlive* settings but nothing changed. > > The only way to manage the gotcha is to send -HUP to master of > unprivileged process. This is the way it is supposed to work. The privileged process needs to stay around until after the unprivileged process goes away. - Tim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 11:25:25 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17B5337B400 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:25:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from oddjob.trewitt.org (adsl-216-102-95-11.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [216.102.95.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E12543E72 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:25:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from glenn@trewitt.org) Received: from trewitt.org (g4.trewitt.org [10.0.0.4]) by oddjob.trewitt.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g7EIPCi01108; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:25:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from glenn@trewitt.org) Message-ID: <3D5AA088.E63C5529@trewitt.org> Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:25:13 -0700 From: Glenn Trewitt Reply-To: glenn@trewitt.org X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 (Macintosh; U; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: trevarthan@wingnet.net Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: setting up a CVSup repository References: <200208140919.35737.trevarthan@wingnet.net> <20020814140526.GA29078@tp.databus.com> <200208141032.04447.trevarthan@wingnet.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I think that what you want is /usr/ports/net/cvsup-mirror. It does exactly this. - Glenn Trewitt Matthias Trevarthan wrote: > On Wednesday 14 August 2002 10:05 am, Barney Wolff wrote: > > This can be done, as another poster has indicated. But it may be too > > much effort for what you want to accomplish. There are multiple ways > > to administer a collection of FreeBSD systems without having each one > > do its own cvsup: > > > > Nope. This is exactly what I want. > > > 1. As you asked, set up your own cvsup mirror. It seems to me that > > this is the way to go only if the systems that will be using it are > > not under your direct supervision. > > > > 2. Do cvsup of the cvs archive on one machine, then have others do > > their own remote CVS checkouts from the archive on that. This is simpler > > in some ways on the server, and really no harder on the clients. It > > allows you to build current and stable and cpu flavors, as you wish. > > > > I'm a little confused about the differences between one and two. Could you > elaborate? > > > 3. cvsup on one machine, build on that, and have all the others > > NFS mount /usr/src, /usr/obj and /usr/ports. This has the feature > > that you control which version is in use and saves a lot of time on > > all the client machines. It is clearly the way to go if all the > > machines are under your supervision and you're willing to build > > stuff that will run on all your cputypes - the optimizations available > > for each type are really minor within the x86 family so the loss > > of the last inch of performance is worth the generality, imho. I > > build separate kernels for each x86 flavor but a common world. > > > > I'm not real fond of NFS. We have a somewhat distributed network, with > multiple server rooms connected by T1s. They're all under my administration, > but I think running CVSup on each machine is fairly ideal. UNIX machines > multitask pretty well, and it only takes about two hours to make buildworld > on my beefy servers. > > I may do this within server rooms though.. Have one master server download and > build the world in each room, then distribute via NFS inside each room... > > Don't know. I'll have to think about it. > > > I actually do #2 but only do the checkout on the local machine and > > build there. > > Again, how does this differ from #1? > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 11:32: 5 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7877D37B400 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:32:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postfix3-2.free.fr (postfix3-2.free.fr [213.228.0.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C8343E6A for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:32:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from thierry@pompo.net) Received: from graf.pompo.net (lyon-2-a7-62-147-21-137.dial.proxad.net [62.147.21.137]) by postfix3-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 332E417E21 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 20:32:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: by graf.pompo.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C460A750D; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 20:24:24 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 20:24:24 +0200 From: Thierry Thomas To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Port devel/pear Message-ID: <20020814182424.GA52272@graf.pompo.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <005b01c2435c$13ce13c0$01000001@office.emetex.ru> <3D59FA9A.2030605@rshb.com.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <3D59FA9A.2030605@rshb.com.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE i386 Organization: Kabbale Eros X-Face: (hRbQnK~Pt7$ct`!fupO(`y_WL4^-Iwn4@ly-.,[4xC4xc;y=\ipKMNm<1J>lv@PP~7Z<.t KjAnXLs: X-PGP: 0xC71405A2 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Le 14/08/2002 à 08:37:14 +0200, Evgueni V. Gavrilov écrivait : > ??????? ????????? wrote: > > >Port devel/pear is now forbidden by the reason "This module is now part > >of mod_php4 as of 4.1.0". But, as I noticed, mod_php4 port doesn't > >install pear. > > > >How can I install port devel/pear? > perl -pi -e 's/^FORBIDDEN.*//' Makefile Don't do that! A lot of PEAR stuff is installed by mod_php4 (now 4.2.2), and it would be overwritten by the older version included in devel/pear. -- Th. Thomas. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 11:32:12 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0256037B401 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:32:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postfix1-2.free.fr (postfix1-2.free.fr [213.228.0.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C7343E72 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:32:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from thierry@pompo.net) Received: from graf.pompo.net (lyon-2-a7-62-147-21-137.dial.proxad.net [62.147.21.137]) by postfix1-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37B3EAB15C for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 20:32:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: by graf.pompo.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8C9987510; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 20:30:15 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 20:30:15 +0200 From: Thierry Thomas To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Port devel/pear Message-ID: <20020814183015.GB52272@graf.pompo.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <005b01c2435c$13ce13c0$01000001@office.emetex.ru> <3D59FA9A.2030605@rshb.com.ru> <20020814071929.GA42326@emetex.ru> <1029314271.1502.0.camel@linux> <20020814101426.GA48417@emetex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20020814101426.GA48417@emetex.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE i386 Organization: Kabbale Eros X-Face: (hRbQnK~Pt7$ct`!fupO(`y_WL4^-Iwn4@ly-.,[4xC4xc;y=\ipKMNm<1J>lv@PP~7Z<.t KjAnXLs: X-PGP: 0xC71405A2 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Le 14/08/2002 à 12:14:26 +0200, Eugene écrivait : > Well, horde port depends on mod_php4. PHP 4.2.2 doesn't contain class Log, > which is required by horde. This class is present in pear port, so I had > to copy class Log from PHP 4.1 or install pear port after cutting FORBIDDEN > from Makefile. > By the way, pear requirements for horde mentioned in http://www.horde.org/pear/ > I just want to draw attention that there is no way to make horde work > with provided manner. mod_php4 do not install some PEAR modules, e.g. Log, which is required by Horde2 / imp3. At the end of /usr/ports/www/horde2/pkg-message, I have added this message: N.B.: if you don't have a directory /usr/local/lib/php/Log, you have * ===== to install it from . The best thing would be to have the port devel/pear updated, with a dependance from www/horde2, and I have submitted a PR for that. See . -- Th. Thomas. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 11:44:14 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 504F037B400; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:44:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blackhelicopters.org (geburah.blackhelicopters.org [209.69.178.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71C9043E3B; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:44:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org) Received: from blackhelicopters.org (mwlucas@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by blackhelicopters.org (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g7EIi6cC088837; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:44:06 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org) Received: (from mwlucas@localhost) by blackhelicopters.org (8.12.4/8.12.4/Submit) id g7EIi6IJ088836; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:44:06 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:44:06 -0400 From: Michael Lucas To: Ruslan Ermilov Cc: Doug Kite , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: make installworld fails Message-ID: <20020814144406.A88820@blackhelicopters.org> References: <20020814154147.65845.qmail@web13002.mail.yahoo.com> <20020814164600.GB54040@sunbay.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020814164600.GB54040@sunbay.com>; from ru@FreeBSD.ORG on Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 07:46:00PM +0300 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hmmm.... If this is a FAQ on the upgrade process, we should possibly include it in the upgrade instructions? On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 07:46:00PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > CHECK YOUR TIME, CHECK YOUR TIME, CHECK YOUR TIME!!! > > This is actually a FAQ question. make(1) attempts to > build during the install which it is not supposed to > be doing. This might be a cause if you rebooted into > single-user with the new kernel and forgot to run > adjkerntz -i. > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 08:41:47AM -0700, Doug Kite wrote: > > I am trying to upgrade from 4.6-RELEASE to 4.6-STABLE. > > > > Cvsup, buildworld, buildkernel and installkernel all > > went fine (as far as I know). > > > > When I try to do installworld, I get the message > > "touch: not found". Touch is in my path and runs fine. > > > > Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. I have been > > trying for days to get this done, running into first > > one problem then another. > > > > Thanks, > > Doug > > > > Following is the output of installworld: > > # make installworld > > mkdir -p /tmp/install.455 > > for prog in [ awk cat chflags chmod chown date echo > > egrep find grep ln make makewhatis mtree mv perl > > pwd_mkdb rm sed sh sysctl test true uname wc zic; do > > cp `which $prog` /tmp/install.455; done > > cd /usr/src; MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj > > MACHINE_ARCH=i386 MACHINE=i386 > > OBJFORMAT_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/libexec > > PERL5LIB=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/libdata/perl/5.00503 > > GROFF_BIN_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/bin > > GROFF_FONT_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/share/groff_font > > GROFF_TMAC_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/share/tmac > > PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/games:/tmp/install.455 > > make -f Makefile.inc1 reinstall > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>> Making hierarchy > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > cd /usr/src; make -f Makefile.inc1 hierarchy > > cd /usr/src/etc; make distrib-dirs > > set - `grep "^[a-zA-Z]" > > /usr/src/etc/locale.deprecated`; while [ $# -gt 0 ] ; > > do for dir in /usr/share/locale /usr/share/nls > > /usr/local/share/nls; do test -d /${dir} && cd > > /${dir}; test -L "$2" && rm -rf "$2"; test \! -L > > "$1" && test -d "$1" && mv "$1" "$2"; done; shift; > > shift; done > > mtree -deU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.root.dist -p / > > mtree -deU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.var.dist -p /var > > mtree -deU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.usr.dist -p /usr > > mtree -deU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.include.dist -p > > /usr/include > > mtree -deU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.include.dist -p > > /usr/libdata/perl/5.00503/mach > > mtree -deU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.sendmail.dist -p > > / > > cd /; rm -f /sys; ln -s usr/src/sys sys > > cd /usr/share/man/en.ISO8859-1; ln -sf ../man* . > > cd /usr/share/man; set - `grep "^[a-zA-Z]" > > /usr/src/etc/man.alias`; while [ $# -gt 0 ] ; do rm > > -rf "$1"; ln -s "$2" "$1"; shift; shift; done > > cd /usr/share/locale; set - `grep "^[a-zA-Z]" > > /usr/src/etc/locale.alias`; while [ $# -gt 0 ] ; do > > rm -rf "$1"; ln -s "$2" "$1"; shift; shift; done > > cd /usr/share/nls; set - `grep "^[a-zA-Z]" > > /usr/src/etc/nls.alias`; while [ $# -gt 0 ] ; do rm > > -rf "$1"; ln -s "$2" "$1"; shift; shift; done > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>> Installing everything.. > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > cd /usr/src; make -f Makefile.inc1 install > > ===> share/info > > ===> include > > creating osreldate.h from newvers.sh > > setvar PARAMFILE /usr/src/include/../sys/sys/param.h; > > . /usr/src/include/../sys/conf/newvers.sh; echo > > "$COPYRIGHT" > osreldate.h; echo "#ifdef _KERNEL" > > >> osreldate.h; echo '#error "osreldate.h must not > > be used in the kernel, use sys/param.h"' >> > > osreldate.h; echo "#else" >> osreldate.h; echo > > \#'undef __FreeBSD_version' >> osreldate.h; echo > > \#'define __FreeBSD_version' $RELDATE >> osreldate.h; > > echo "#endif" >> osreldate.h > > touch: not found > > *** Error code 127 > > > > Stop in /usr/src/include. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/src. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/src. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/src. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/src. > > > Cheers, > -- > Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, > ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, > ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, > +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine > > http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve > http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age -- Michael Lucas mwlucas@FreeBSD.org, mwlucas@BlackHelicopters.org http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/q/Big_Scary_Daemons Absolute BSD: http://www.AbsoluteBSD.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 12: 3:23 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26C8E37B400 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 12:03:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pc1-cove2-4-cust33.bir.cable.ntl.com (pc1-cove2-4-cust33.bir.cable.ntl.com [80.4.78.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2312843E3B for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 12:03:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ianjhart@ntlworld.com) Received: from ntlworld.com (alpha.private.lan [192.168.0.2]) by pc1-cove2-4-cust33.bir.cable.ntl.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g7EJ3H18007784; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 20:03:18 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from ianjhart@ntlworld.com) Message-ID: <3D5AA975.2003B3E6@ntlworld.com> Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 20:03:17 +0100 From: ian j hart X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: hetzels@westbend.net Subject: cyrus SASL (1) in base Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG FYI The include files for SASL (1) have moved as of cyrus-sasl-1.5.27_5. If you build sendmail with SASL (1) you'll need to change SENDMAIL_CFLAGS. This makes /etc/defaults/make.conf out of date. See also ports/40288 -- ian j hart To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 12:54:46 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F150237B400 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 12:54:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.westbend.net (ns1.westbend.net [216.47.253.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5166E43E72 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 12:54:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hetzels@westbend.net) Received: from Admin01 (admin01.westbend.net [216.47.253.18]) by mail.westbend.net (8.12.5/8.12.5) with SMTP id g7EJsZlG019698; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:54:35 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from hetzels@westbend.net) Message-ID: <011a01c243cc$5f1646c0$12fd2fd8@Admin01> From: "Scot W. Hetzel" To: "ian j hart" , References: <3D5AA975.2003B3E6@ntlworld.com> Subject: Re: cyrus SASL (1) in base Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:54:15 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > The include files for SASL (1) have moved as of > cyrus-sasl-1.5.27_5. If you build sendmail with SASL (1) > you'll need to change SENDMAIL_CFLAGS. > > This makes /etc/defaults/make.conf out of date. > The make.conf file on both -CURRENT & -STABLE were change 2 weeks ago. > See also ports/40288 > This PR was commited 2 weeks ago by ume, and all mentioned ports were updated. Scot To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 13:46:18 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 227A337B400 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:46:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from walton.kettenis.dyndns.org (a169250.upc-a.chello.nl [62.163.169.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0DBE43E42 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:46:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org) Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org [192.168.0.2]) by walton.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7EKkE7p000508 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 22:46:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org) Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7EKkE14013132 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 22:46:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g7EKkERe013129; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 22:46:14 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 22:46:14 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200208142046.g7EKkERe013129@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Mark Kettenis Subject: FreeBSD's -STABLE gcc produces bad debug info Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi folks, While working on GDB, I discovered that the version of gcc in -STABLE produces bugus debug info. I filed a bug report (bin/41671), which includes a patch that fixes the problem. Please consider the patch for inclusion in 4.7. Thanks, Mark To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 14:10:31 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DE8C37B400 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:10:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from doc.chasma.net (ns2.chasma.net [63.175.99.115]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7CFCA43E4A for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:10:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fogalt@chasma.net) Received: (qmail 68189 invoked by uid 0); 14 Aug 2002 21:03:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chasma.net) (10.0.0.177) by ns2.chasma.net with SMTP; 14 Aug 2002 21:03:05 -0000 From: tom fogal Reply-To: fogal_t@chasma.net To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tar.o linking problems In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 13 Aug 2002 15:08:31 PDT." <3D59835F.3060706@owt.com> Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 17:05:01 -0400 Message-Id: <20020814211023.7CFCA43E4A@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG i had actually already tried this. monday night, i cvsupped, and had the error. i just left it to try again tomorrow.. and it happened again so i emailed the list. i cvsup'd yet again, though, at about 1pm EST today. Still the same problem; tar.o and a bunch of related object files dont link up correctly to build gnu tar. ive been looking around a bit and think it might be trying to compile/link two different 'tar' sources. /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/tar is where i get the error, and it uses some sources from /usr/src/contrib/tar/lib. 'add_exclude' is the first function that cc complains about. the reason i think that its using different sources, is because this function has a different prototype in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/tar and /usr/src/contrib/tar/lib/exclude.c.. of course, im totally guessing around here. ive little idea how the make buildworld process is supposed to work, and whether or not sources should be spread out like they seem to be... if anyone could shed some light on the subject, or has any other ideas, it would be greatly appreciated :) thanks, -tom tom fogal wrote: > Hey all, > > just cvsup'ed to the latest stable this morning, from a stable > dated a month or so ago. 'make buildworld' dies when trying to > build tar: > > cc -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -DHAVE_CONFIG_H > -I/usr/local/nfs/src/gnu/usr.bin/tar > -I/usr/local/nfs/src/gnu/usr.bin/tar/../../../contrib/tar/lib > -I/usr/local/nfs/src/gnu/usr.bin/tar/../../../contrib/tar/src > -static -o tar addext.o argmatch.o backupfile.o basename.o > dirname.o error.o exclude.o full-write.o getdate.o getline.o > getopt.o getopt1.o getstr.o hash.o human.o mktime.o modechange.o > prepargs.o print-copyr.o quotearg.o safe-read.o save-cwd.o > savedir.o unicodeio.o xgetcwd.o xmalloc.o xstrdup.o xstrtoul.o > xstrtoumax.o strtoumax.o buffer.o compare.o create.o delete.o > extract.o incremen.o list.o mangle.o misc.o names.o rtapelib.o > tar.o update.o tar.o: In function `add_exclude': tar.o(.text+0x177c): > multiple definition of `add_exclude' exclude.o(.text+0x1d8): > first defined here ... (a bunch of other, similar messages) ... update.o: > In function `junk_archive': update.o(.text+0x3e2): undefined > reference to `msg' update.o(.text+0x3f2): undefined reference to > `msg' update.o(.text+0x4b8): undefined reference to `msg' update.o(.text+0x54d): > undefined reference to `msg' update.o(.text+0x93a): more > undefined references to `msg' follow > > if your interested in seeing all of the undefined references and > other errors, see: http://www.freebsdhackers.net/fogalt/abridged_script > > > any ideas? > > thanks in advance, > I cvsuped at 1001 am PDT (1701 GMT) and didn't have any problems. Did you try cvsuping again to see if you grabbed something in the middle of an update? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 14:13:37 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A9D337B400 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:13:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pc1-cove2-4-cust33.bir.cable.ntl.com (pc1-cove2-4-cust33.bir.cable.ntl.com [80.4.78.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21A3E43E65 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:13:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ianjhart@ntlworld.com) Received: from ntlworld.com (alpha.private.lan [192.168.0.2]) by pc1-cove2-4-cust33.bir.cable.ntl.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g7ELDV18007968; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 22:13:31 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from ianjhart@ntlworld.com) Message-ID: <3D5AC7FB.7539B147@ntlworld.com> Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 22:13:31 +0100 From: ian j hart X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Scot W. Hetzel" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cyrus SASL (1) in base References: <3D5AA975.2003B3E6@ntlworld.com> <011a01c243cc$5f1646c0$12fd2fd8@Admin01> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Scot W. Hetzel" wrote: > > > The include files for SASL (1) have moved as of > > cyrus-sasl-1.5.27_5. If you build sendmail with SASL (1) > > you'll need to change SENDMAIL_CFLAGS. > > > > This makes /etc/defaults/make.conf out of date. > > > The make.conf file on both -CURRENT & -STABLE were change 2 weeks ago. That's nice, but my sources are older than two weeks. I therefore do not have the hint in the updated make.conf. My buildworld still failed, on sources that compiled before AND HAVE NOT CHANGED. Hence my annoyance. Why did it fail? I used portupgrade. Since the sasl headers have now moved buildworld fails. * No warning in pkg_message. * No heads up to stable. * Nothing in UPDATING - not that I'd have seen this. My original post was an attempt to save anyone else from wasting $buildworldtime hours. > > > See also ports/40288 > > > This PR was commited 2 weeks ago by ume, and all mentioned ports were > updated. I know, I just read it. This is a reference; for people who aren't fsck'in psychic. Ports, schmorts. The base system is potentially impacted by this change. A "HEADS UP" would have been nice. And now there is one :) > > Scot > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- ian j hart To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 14:39:45 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D8D337B401 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:39:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freeway.dcfinc.com (ip68-98-13-80.ph.ph.cox.net [68.98.13.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DB2243E65 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:39:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chad@freeway.dcfinc.com) Received: (from chad@localhost) by freeway.dcfinc.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA02368; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:39:38 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from chad) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:39:38 -0700 From: "Chad R. Larson" To: Bill Vermillion Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: A but in Zoo Message-ID: <20020814143938.B2297@freeway.dcfinc.com> References: <20020814114442.GA77130@wjv.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020814114442.GA77130@wjv.com>; from bv@wjv.com on Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 07:44:42AM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 07:44:42AM -0400, Bill Vermillion wrote: > I just checked on about 6 systems I have access to, 4.6, 4.5, 4.2 > and a 4.0, and they all exhibit the same behaviour. I don't know > when it changed, but the sources to zoo have not changed since > the early 1990s, and the sources when extracted all show > a day of May 1, 1993. > > So I'm suspecting that something changed in the 4.x series. > I don't have anything prior to 4.x to check on. > > I've not created any zoo archives in the past couple of years but > it used to work, and I've used it on many platforms. > Since the code is the same and has not changed since Rahul Dhesi > wrote the last version in 1991 - would it not stand to reason then > that something has changed in FreeBSD since the 4.x came out. > > Could someone who has a pre 4.x system check this? This is a 2.2.8-STABLE system. What would you like me to try? > Bill -crl -- Chad R. Larson (CRL15) 602-953-1392 Brother, can you paradigm? chad@dcfinc.com chad@larsons.org larson1@home.com DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 14:42:28 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C95B637B40B for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:42:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from services.webwarrior.net (overlord-host99.dsl.visi.com [209.98.86.99]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5835A43E3B for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:42:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from friar_josh@webwarrior.net) Received: from heater.vladsempire.net (12-218-27-215.client.mchsi.com [12.218.27.215]) by services.webwarrior.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B42024FA5; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 16:42:26 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.6 rl0 and xl0 watchdog timeout problems (and solution) From: Josh Paetzel Reply-To: friar_josh@webwarrior.net To: Jim Frost Cc: Bosko Milekic , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <1029270995.6144.127.camel@icehouse> References: <1029102290.9472.188.camel@snowball.frostbytes.com> <20020813162742.B2869@unixdaemons.com> <1029270995.6144.127.camel@icehouse> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 14 Aug 2002 16:40:45 +0000 Message-Id: <1029343247.364.22.camel@heater.vladsempire.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 20:36, Jim Frost wrote: > On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 16:27, Bosko Milekic wrote: > > > > I thought maybe the thing was incorrectly sensing the media; I still > run > > > 10baseT because it's here and it works and I don't see why I should > > > spend money on a new hub. ifconfig said it autoconfigured to > > > 10baseT/UTP but just to be sure I forced the config. Same problem. > > > > What was sharing the card's IRQ? When you have devices sharing IRQs, > > it obviously takes longer before the handler gets to run. The > > watchdog is getting fired off before the handler gets to run. Was the > > interface working at all? > > I've realized that I did not clearly state the nature of the problem. > No other cards exist in the system to share an IRQ with; this card was > assigned its own (IRQ12 FWIW). > > What appears to be special is that the slot that the card in shares a > single PCI interrupt assignment with another slot (which was empty). > I.e. if I go into the BIOS config it lists a number of things that can > be assigned interrupts, all of which are currently set to "auto". The > PCI slot assignments are 1/3, 2/6, 4, and 5 (ie only four interrupts can > be assigned between six slots). So long as the card is in slot 4 or > slot 5 it works; if it's in 1, 2, 3 or 6 it does not. > > > Sounds good. You know, it's entirely possible that other operating > > systems silently ignore the watchdog timeouts and you may just think > > that FreeBSD is the problem because it's telling you that maybe you > > should think about changing your setup. > > Could be; certainly that was the case back in the old days with cheap > IDE interfaces that didn't deliver interrupts. Personally I don't much > care if it's just BSD being more picky, but "watchdog timeout" did not > seem to indicate "card is in the wrong PCI slot" to me. > > jim > Did you have the ps/2 mouse controller disabled? That lives on IRQ 12 on every motherboard I"ve seen in ATX form factor. Josh To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 14:46:38 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E3C937B400 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:46:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nebula.wanadoo.fr (ca-sqy-3-191.abo.wanadoo.fr [80.8.56.191]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1310D43E65 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:46:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dak@wanadoo.fr) Received: from nebula.wanadoo.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nebula.wanadoo.fr (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7ELhRsJ000271 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 23:43:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dak@nebula.wanadoo.fr) Received: (from dak@localhost) by nebula.wanadoo.fr (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g7ELhQjv000270 for stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 23:43:26 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 23:43:26 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-15?Q?Aur=E9lien?= Nephtali To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Laptop doesn't free memory so old dmesg can be seen Message-ID: <20020814214326.GA237@nebula.WorkGroup> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, When i reboot multiple times, i can see old 'dmesg' messages when running 'dmesg'. I read in a thread (that i cannot find again) it was due to my laptop which wasn't cleaning the memory correctly. Is there a patch or something like this available and not yet commited ? -- Aur=E9lien --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9Ws7+DNsbHbt8ok8RAhbfAJ9Mld7uZh63zJHhvHDTotyQHhieLgCgpt/6 TUo1CbpuARlutLdZhfEuAhQ= =QZLf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 14:48:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EEC937B400 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:48:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from frostbytes.com (dsl092-065-149.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.65.149]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 323A943E42 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:48:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jimf@frostbytes.com) Received: from [10.1.6.20] (cmb2-nip1.atg.com [63.116.205.150]) by frostbytes.com (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id RAA19929; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 17:47:48 -0400 Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.6 rl0 and xl0 watchdog timeout problems (and solution) From: Jim Frost To: friar_josh@webwarrior.net Cc: Bosko Milekic , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <1029343247.364.22.camel@heater.vladsempire.net> References: <1029102290.9472.188.camel@snowball.frostbytes.com> <20020813162742.B2869@unixdaemons.com> <1029270995.6144.127.camel@icehouse> <1029343247.364.22.camel@heater.vladsempire.net> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6) Date: 14 Aug 2002 17:45:03 -0400 Message-Id: <1029361503.9726.108.camel@icehouse> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 12:40, Josh Paetzel wrote: > > Could be; certainly that was the case back in the old days with cheap > > IDE interfaces that didn't deliver interrupts. Personally I don't much > > care if it's just BSD being more picky, but "watchdog timeout" did not > > seem to indicate "card is in the wrong PCI slot" to me. > > > Did you have the ps/2 mouse controller disabled? That lives on IRQ 12 > on every motherboard I"ve seen in ATX form factor. The mouse controller is not disabled (although it is unused). I had thought that it was still using irq12 in the new slot, but I just checked and it's not -- it's irq11 now. So that, ultimately, may be the problem. Thanks! jim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 14:58:39 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A04937B400 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:58:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE8C343E72 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:58:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (IDENT:brdavis@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g7ELwYwu011106; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:58:34 -0700 Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g7ELwXat011105; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:58:33 -0700 Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:58:33 -0700 From: Brooks Davis To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Aur=E9lien_Nephtali?= Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Laptop doesn't free memory so old dmesg can be seen Message-ID: <20020814145833.A8470@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> References: <20020814214326.GA237@nebula.WorkGroup> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="envbJBWh7q8WU6mo" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20020814214326.GA237@nebula.WorkGroup>; from aurelien.nephtali@wanadoo.fr on Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 11:43:26PM +0200 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) on odin.ac.hmc.edu Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --envbJBWh7q8WU6mo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 11:43:26PM +0200, Aur=E9lien Nephtali wrote: >=20 > When i reboot multiple times, i can see old 'dmesg' messages when > running 'dmesg'. I read in a thread (that i cannot find again) it > was due to my laptop which wasn't cleaning the memory correctly. >=20 > Is there a patch or something like this available and not yet commited ? This is deliberate. I think it's annoying too, but there are times when it's helpful and thus that's how things are configured. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --envbJBWh7q8WU6mo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9WtKJXY6L6fI4GtQRArokAJ9IRwacWqXGOAZYyNp3Dmy0p0CVkwCg5yHh Jrmk/NaspmFz/9ByxGo5lvo= =Iffz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --envbJBWh7q8WU6mo-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 16: 8:54 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F15B037B400; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 16:08:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 565A443E6E; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 16:08:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from owt.com (owt-207-41-94-232.owt.com [207.41.94.232]) by rutger.owt.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA23865; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 16:08:42 -0700 Message-ID: <3D5AE2FA.4030308@owt.com> Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 16:08:42 -0700 From: Kent Stewart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020314 Netscape6/6.2.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us, es-mx MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Lucas Cc: Ruslan Ermilov , Doug Kite , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: make installworld fails References: <20020814154147.65845.qmail@web13002.mail.yahoo.com> <20020814164600.GB54040@sunbay.com> <20020814144406.A88820@blackhelicopters.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Michael Lucas wrote: > Hmmm.... > > If this is a FAQ on the upgrade process, we should possibly include it > in the upgrade instructions? Using adjkerntz is in updating; however, if you search for 4.x-stable, it is in the page above what you are looking at. Kent > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 07:46:00PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > >>CHECK YOUR TIME, CHECK YOUR TIME, CHECK YOUR TIME!!! >> >>This is actually a FAQ question. make(1) attempts to >>build during the install which it is not supposed to >>be doing. This might be a cause if you rebooted into >>single-user with the new kernel and forgot to run >>adjkerntz -i. >> >>On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 08:41:47AM -0700, Doug Kite wrote: >> >>>I am trying to upgrade from 4.6-RELEASE to 4.6-STABLE. >>> >>>Cvsup, buildworld, buildkernel and installkernel all >>>went fine (as far as I know). >>> >>>When I try to do installworld, I get the message >>>"touch: not found". Touch is in my path and runs fine. >>> >>>Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. I have been >>>trying for days to get this done, running into first >>>one problem then another. >>> >>>Thanks, >>>Doug >>> >>>Following is the output of installworld: >>># make installworld >>>mkdir -p /tmp/install.455 >>>for prog in [ awk cat chflags chmod chown date echo >>>egrep find grep ln make makewhatis mtree mv perl >>>pwd_mkdb rm sed sh sysctl test true uname wc zic; do >>>cp `which $prog` /tmp/install.455; done >>>cd /usr/src; MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj >>>MACHINE_ARCH=i386 MACHINE=i386 >>>OBJFORMAT_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/libexec >>>PERL5LIB=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/libdata/perl/5.00503 >>> GROFF_BIN_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/bin >>>GROFF_FONT_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/share/groff_font >>> GROFF_TMAC_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/share/tmac >>>PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/games:/tmp/install.455 >>>make -f Makefile.inc1 reinstall >>>-------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>>>>>Making hierarchy >>>>>> >>>-------------------------------------------------------------- >>>cd /usr/src; make -f Makefile.inc1 hierarchy >>>cd /usr/src/etc; make distrib-dirs >>>set - `grep "^[a-zA-Z]" >>>/usr/src/etc/locale.deprecated`; while [ $# -gt 0 ] ; >>> do for dir in /usr/share/locale /usr/share/nls >>>/usr/local/share/nls; do test -d /${dir} && cd >>>/${dir}; test -L "$2" && rm -rf "$2"; test \! -L >>>"$1" && test -d "$1" && mv "$1" "$2"; done; shift; >>>shift; done >>>mtree -deU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.root.dist -p / >>>mtree -deU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.var.dist -p /var >>>mtree -deU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.usr.dist -p /usr >>>mtree -deU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.include.dist -p >>>/usr/include >>>mtree -deU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.include.dist -p >>>/usr/libdata/perl/5.00503/mach >>>mtree -deU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.sendmail.dist -p >>>/ >>>cd /; rm -f /sys; ln -s usr/src/sys sys >>>cd /usr/share/man/en.ISO8859-1; ln -sf ../man* . >>>cd /usr/share/man; set - `grep "^[a-zA-Z]" >>>/usr/src/etc/man.alias`; while [ $# -gt 0 ] ; do rm >>>-rf "$1"; ln -s "$2" "$1"; shift; shift; done >>>cd /usr/share/locale; set - `grep "^[a-zA-Z]" >>>/usr/src/etc/locale.alias`; while [ $# -gt 0 ] ; do >>>rm -rf "$1"; ln -s "$2" "$1"; shift; shift; done >>>cd /usr/share/nls; set - `grep "^[a-zA-Z]" >>>/usr/src/etc/nls.alias`; while [ $# -gt 0 ] ; do rm >>>-rf "$1"; ln -s "$2" "$1"; shift; shift; done >>> >>>-------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>>>>>Installing everything.. >>>>>> >>>-------------------------------------------------------------- >>>cd /usr/src; make -f Makefile.inc1 install >>>===> share/info >>>===> include >>>creating osreldate.h from newvers.sh >>>setvar PARAMFILE /usr/src/include/../sys/sys/param.h; >>>. /usr/src/include/../sys/conf/newvers.sh; echo >>>"$COPYRIGHT" > osreldate.h; echo "#ifdef _KERNEL" >>> >>>>>osreldate.h; echo '#error "osreldate.h must not >>>>> >>>be used in the kernel, use sys/param.h"' >> >>>osreldate.h; echo "#else" >> osreldate.h; echo >>>\#'undef __FreeBSD_version' >> osreldate.h; echo >>>\#'define __FreeBSD_version' $RELDATE >> osreldate.h; >>>echo "#endif" >> osreldate.h >>>touch: not found >>>*** Error code 127 >>> >>>Stop in /usr/src/include. >>>*** Error code 1 >>> >>>Stop in /usr/src. >>>*** Error code 1 >>> >>>Stop in /usr/src. >>>*** Error code 1 >>> >>>Stop in /usr/src. >>>*** Error code 1 >>> >>>Stop in /usr/src. >>> >> >>Cheers, >>-- >>Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, >>ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, >>ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, >>+380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine >> >>http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve >>http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age >> > > > -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 16:26:29 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22DCA37B401; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 16:26:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from host4.the-web-host.com (host4.the-web-host.com [209.239.49.190]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3483843E77; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 16:26:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bjones@polestar.org) Received: from 216.64.128.42 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host4.the-web-host.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id g7ENQD805863; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 19:26:13 -0400 To: kstewart@owt.com From: Bill Jones Subject: Re: make installworld fails Reply-To: bjones@polestar.org Cc: mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org, ru@FreeBSD.ORG, niteskyguy@yahoo.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 16:19:20 -0700 X-Sender: bjones@polestar.org X-Originating-Host: 216.64.128.42 [216.64.128.42]; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 23:26:13 GMT X-Mailer: WebMail Check v2.3.21 (2000-7-19) X-Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 4.0; T312461), JavaScript: On Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Kent Stewart wrote: >Michael Lucas wrote: > > Hmmm.... > > If this is a FAQ on the upgrade process, we should possibly include it > in the upgrade instructions? > > >Using adjkerntz is in updating; however, if you search for 4.x-stable, >it is in the page above what you are looking at. You're correct. It's in there in section 20.4.4 of the handbook, but it does appear quite a bit before the section for rebooting to single-user mode after having installed the kernel. I hadn't really noticed before, but the handbook appears to recommend (based on the order of the sections) that building the world should be done in single user. Does anyone really do that anymore with modern fast CPUS? Is there a reason I'm missing against building both the kernel and the world in multi-user mode, other than speed? Perhaps the handbook could be updated slightly to reflect the more common approach of staying in multi-user while building world and kernel, installing kernel THEN rebooting to single user mode and installing world. If not that, then at least a second mention of adjkerntz -i in the section on rebooting to your new kernel might have merit. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 16:28: 3 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1141B37B400; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 16:28:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from topaz.mdcc.cx (topaz.mdcc.cx [212.204.230.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99D6443E84; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 16:27:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from edwin@mavetju.org) Received: from k7.mavetju (topaz.mdcc.cx [212.204.230.141]) by topaz.mdcc.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9A4E2B686; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 01:27:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: by k7.mavetju (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6644A6A7123; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 09:27:49 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 09:27:49 +1000 From: Edwin Groothuis To: Christopher Vance Cc: www@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HTTP mirror www.au.freebsd.org is broken Message-ID: <20020814232749.GC785@k7.mavetju> Mail-Followup-To: Edwin Groothuis , Christopher Vance , www@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20020814153925.B22888@aurema.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020814153925.B22888@aurema.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 03:39:25PM +1000, Christopher Vance wrote: > This doesn't seem to have been updated since May. Please give them > a kick or remove their DNS entry. I've informed the guys from planetmirror.com about it. Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.MavEtJu.org edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/weblog.php bash$ :(){ :|:&};: | Interested in MUDs? http://www.FatalDimensions.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 17:42:19 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D8C337B400; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 17:42:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E565743E3B; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 17:42:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from owt.com (owt-207-41-94-232.owt.com [207.41.94.232]) by rutger.owt.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA29345; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 17:42:08 -0700 Message-ID: <3D5AF8DF.2070307@owt.com> Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 17:42:07 -0700 From: Kent Stewart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020314 Netscape6/6.2.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us, es-mx MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bjones@polestar.org Cc: mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org, ru@FreeBSD.ORG, niteskyguy@yahoo.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: make installworld fails References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Bill Jones wrote: > Kent Stewart wrote: > > >>Michael Lucas wrote: >> >>Hmmm.... >> >>If this is a FAQ on the upgrade process, we should possibly include it >>in the upgrade instructions? >> >> >>Using adjkerntz is in updating; however, if you search for 4.x-stable, >>it is in the page above what you are looking at. >> > > You're correct. It's in there in section 20.4.4 of the handbook, > but it does appear quite a bit before the section for rebooting > to single-user mode after having installed the kernel. > > I hadn't really noticed before, but the handbook appears to recommend > (based on the order of the sections) that building the world should > be done in single user. Does anyone really do that anymore with > modern fast CPUS? Is there a reason I'm missing against building > both the kernel and the world in multi-user mode, other than speed? No, it tells you that you may have to boot to single user mode to do the installworld. That is something you really want to do anyway because it tests your new kernel before you fully commit your system to the new arrangement. Kent > > Perhaps the handbook could be updated slightly to reflect the more > common approach of staying in multi-user while building world and > kernel, installing kernel THEN rebooting to single user mode and > installing world. > > If not that, then at least a second mention of adjkerntz -i in the > section on rebooting to your new kernel might have merit. > > > > > > > > > > . > > -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 19:35: 9 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9698E37B400 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 19:35:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rshb.com.ru (rshb.com.ru [195.162.58.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFDE543E3B for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 19:35:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from admin@rshb.com.ru) Received: by rshb.com.ru (Sendmail for UK-NC RT11-SJ, from userid 426) id AAB4F20F1D; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 09:35:02 +0700 (OMSST) Received: from rshb.com.ru (vampiro.rsb.local [192.168.1.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Evgueni V. Gavrilov", Issuer "RSHB Omsk branch CA" (verified OK)) by rshb.com.ru (Sendmail for UK-NC RT11-SJ) with ESMTP id 7C7F120F0E; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 09:35:02 +0700 (OMSST) Message-ID: <3D5B1355.50401@rshb.com.ru> Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 09:35:01 +0700 From: "Evgueni V. Gavrilov" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020813 X-Accept-Language: ru, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tim Zingelman Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: gotcha with OpenSSH 3.4 and PrivilegeSeparation References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Tim Zingelman wrote: >>Upon loosing of remote client unprivileged process of sshd doesn't die. >>I tried to vary KeepAlive and/or ClientAlive* settings but nothing changed. >> >>The only way to manage the gotcha is to send -HUP to master of >>unprivileged process. > > This is the way it is supposed to work. The privileged process needs to > stay around until after the unprivileged process goes away. > I understand this, but why unprivileged process goes away without PrivSep and stays with PrivSep turned on ? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 20:12: 6 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A4BF37B400 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 20:12:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web13002.mail.yahoo.com (web13002.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.174.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 370EA43E6A for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 20:12:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from niteskyguy@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20020815031203.70701.qmail@web13002.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [68.101.21.146] by web13002.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 20:12:03 PDT Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 20:12:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Kite Subject: cdrom: device not configured error To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I am having problems getting my cdrom to mount. Odd thing is, I installed from the cdrom, but after the install is finished and I reboot, it won't work. The error is: cd9660: /dev/acd0c: Device not configured There is no cd or acd* mentioned in dmesg. When I boot from the install cd, dmesg shows it as device acd0: at ata0-slave PIO4 (no "c" on the acd0). I have also tried booting to kernel.GENERIC, but still nothing in dmesg. I installed 4.6-RELEASE, but upgraded to stable in hopes of solving this. (Thanks to all for the help on the adjkerntz issue.) Now on stable, still same results. I have even tried making sure I have a cd in the drive when booting. This is 4.6-stable on a Dell Latitude laptop. The cd works fine with the other os on the machine, and I have tried different cd's. Any ideas would be appreciated. Thanks, Doug __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs http://www.hotjobs.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 20:20:37 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2BB437B400 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 20:20:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lerlaptop.lerctr.org (lerlaptop.lerctr.org [207.158.72.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FDDE43E75 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 20:20:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ler@lerctr.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lerlaptop.lerctr.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7F3KUZn000510; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 22:20:30 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ler@lerctr.org) Subject: Re: cdrom: device not configured error From: Larry Rosenman To: Doug Kite Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20020815031203.70701.qmail@web13002.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20020815031203.70701.qmail@web13002.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 14 Aug 2002 22:20:30 -0500 Message-Id: <1029381630.402.1.camel@lerlaptop.lerctr.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Do you have /dev/acd0c and /dev/acd0a with the same minor number, I.E: $ cd /dev $ ls -l acd* crw-r----- 4 root operator 117, 0 Aug 11 21:24 acd0a crw-r----- 4 root operator 117, 0 Aug 11 21:24 acd0c crw-r----- 4 root operator 117, 8 Aug 11 21:24 acd1a crw-r----- 4 root operator 117, 8 Aug 11 21:24 acd1c $ If not, read the march notice in UPDATING, you need a later /dev/MAKEDEV script. On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 22:12, Doug Kite wrote: > I am having problems getting my cdrom to mount. Odd > thing is, I installed from the cdrom, but after the > install is finished and I reboot, it won't work. The > error is: > cd9660: /dev/acd0c: Device not configured > > There is no cd or acd* mentioned in dmesg. When I boot > from the install cd, dmesg shows it as device acd0: at > ata0-slave PIO4 (no "c" on the acd0). I have also > tried booting to kernel.GENERIC, but still nothing in > dmesg. > > I installed 4.6-RELEASE, but upgraded to stable in > hopes of solving this. (Thanks to all for the help on > the adjkerntz issue.) Now on stable, still same > results. I have even tried making sure I have a cd in > the drive when booting. > > This is 4.6-stable on a Dell Latitude laptop. The cd > works fine with the other os on the machine, and I > have tried different cd's. > > Any ideas would be appreciated. > > Thanks, > Doug > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs > http://www.hotjobs.com > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 20:23: 9 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 337C537B400 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 20:23:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp3.southeast.rr.com (smtp3.southeast.rr.com [24.93.67.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BA8043E65 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 20:23:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bts@fake.com) Received: from mail6.nc.rr.com (fe6 [24.93.67.53]) by smtp3.southeast.rr.com (8.12.5/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g7F3Mkga000800; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 23:22:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from this.is.fake.com ([66.26.254.93]) by mail6.nc.rr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.757.75); Wed, 14 Aug 2002 23:22:59 -0400 Received: by this.is.fake.com (Postfix, from userid 111) id 7A1FFBB34; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 23:22:49 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: "Brian T. Schellenberger" To: Doug Kite , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cdrom: device not configured error Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 23:22:49 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.2 References: <20020815031203.70701.qmail@web13002.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20020815031203.70701.qmail@web13002.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200208142322.49172.bts@babbleon.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wednesday 14 August 2002 11:12 pm, Doug Kite wrote: | I am having problems getting my cdrom to mount. Odd | thing is, I installed from the cdrom, but after the | install is finished and I reboot, it won't work. The | error is: | cd9660: /dev/acd0c: Device not configured | | There is no cd or acd* mentioned in dmesg. When I boot | from the install cd, dmesg shows it as device acd0: at | ata0-slave PIO4 (no "c" on the acd0). I have also | tried booting to kernel.GENERIC, but still nothing in | dmesg. | | I installed 4.6-RELEASE, but upgraded to stable in | hopes of solving this. (Thanks to all for the help on | the adjkerntz issue.) Now on stable, still same | results. I have even tried making sure I have a cd in | the drive when booting. The 'c' is just the psuedo-partition for the 'complete' disk--that part isn't a problem. Have you tried cd /dev ./MAKEDEV acd0 ? -- Brian, the man from Babble-On . . . . bts@babbleon.org (personal) http://www.babbleon.org http://www.eff.org http://www.programming-freedom.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 14 20:33:29 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3730337B400; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 20:33:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cet.cet.com (cet.cet.com [209.210.192.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9525043E4A; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 20:33:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bjones@polestar.org) Received: from polaris.polestar.org (altair.cet.com [206.63.64.237]) by cet.cet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id UAA04619; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 20:22:15 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: cet.cet.com: Host altair.cet.com [206.63.64.237] claimed to be polaris.polestar.org Received: from altair (altair [192.168.0.11]) by polaris.polestar.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7F3X3C09219; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 20:33:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bjones@polestar.org) Message-ID: <200208142033100180.00D9487D@polaris> In-Reply-To: <3D5AF8DF.2070307@owt.com> References: <3D5AF8DF.2070307@owt.com> X-Mailer: Calypso Version 3.30.00.00 (3) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 20:33:10 -0700 Reply-To: bjones@polestar.org From: "Bill Jones" To: "Kent Stewart" Cc: mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org, ru@FreeBSD.ORG, niteskyguy@yahoo.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: make installworld fails Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 8/14/2002 at 5:42 PM Kent Stewart wrote: >Bill Jones wrote: > >> I hadn't really noticed before, but the handbook appears to recommend >> (based on the order of the sections) that building the world should >> be done in single user. Does anyone really do that anymore with >> modern fast CPUS? Is there a reason I'm missing against building >> both the kernel and the world in multi-user mode, other than speed? > >No, it tells you that you may have to boot to single user mode to do >the installworld. That is something you really want to do anyway >because it tests your new kernel before you fully commit your system >to the new arrangement. Yes, I know how to test a new kernel. I was demonstrating how the handbook= creates a step-by-step that somewhat deviates from normal use, thus -- 20.4.1 Read Updating Yes, this really should be first. 20.4.2 Check /etc/make.conf Seen enough people shoot themselves in the foot to know why this is here! 20.4.3 Update files in /etc Those pesky group problems.. fair enough. 20.4.4 Drop to single user mode WHOA! A little premature, eh? We haven't built anything yet. 20.4.5 Remove /usr/obj If we HAD built something, it's gone now. 20.4.6 Recompile the source Aha... make buildworld, finally. 20.4.7 Compile and install a new kernel Make buildkernel and make installkernel in one step. 20.4.8 Reboot into single user mode We're already in single user mode, though rebooting helps that pesky kernel test. 20.4.9 Install the new system binaries Make installworld here 20.4.10 Update files Mergemaster lies here 20.4.11 Update /dev 20.4.12 Update /stand 20.4.13 Reboot Hooray, back to multi-user Interestingly enough, under 20.4.15 (Questions), you'll find "How can I= speed up making the world?" Number 1 on the list? Run in single user= mode. If we'd followed the instructions as presented here, we would have= already done that and had no speed increase. Also missing from the= question "What do I do if something goes wrong?" is how to revert back to= your old kernel if something goes wrong after you reboot to single user. --- The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Aug 15 2:54:32 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0009637B400 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 02:54:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2541F43E65 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 02:54:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gerrit@gencon.co.uk) Received: from [212.227.126.155] (helo=mrelayng1.kundenserver.de) by moutng5.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #2) id 17fHKn-0000AK-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 11:54:29 +0200 Received: from [80.136.135.183] (helo=localhost) by mrelayng1.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #2) id 17fHKm-00077Q-00 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 11:54:28 +0200 Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 11:54:27 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v482) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gerrit_R=FCsing?= To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.482) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ======================================================== Fingerprint: 867B FA79 B7F6 A004 8303 A97B AE75 E599 AE9E BD75 ======================================================== To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Aug 15 3: 0:47 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F67E37B400 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 03:00:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.darq.net (phear.darq.net [213.253.1.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B3B2543E4A for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 03:00:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from reflex@darq.net) Received: (qmail 614 invoked by uid 1000); 15 Aug 2002 10:00:43 -0000 Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 11:00:42 +0100 From: Ian Morrison To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20020815110042.A28458@phear.darq.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i X-Url: http://www.darq.net/ Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG subscribe -- :: darq.net /#/ :: such swoopy interwords | mnemonica To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Aug 15 6:55: 2 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73C9E37B400 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 06:54:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.pressenter.com (hermes.pressenter.com [209.224.20.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD4C43E84 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 06:54:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nospam@hiltonbsd.com) Received: from [209.224.35.188] (helo=daggar.sbgnet.net) by hermes.pressenter.com with smtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 17fL5J-0001no-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 08:54:45 -0500 Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 08:54:40 -0500 From: Stephen Hilton To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Need instructions: build kernel on one machine; install on another Message-Id: <20020815085440.45f1d5fc.nospam@hiltonbsd.com> In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020813084802.037d9498@magpie.zpfe.com> References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020813084802.037d9498@magpie.zpfe.com> Organization: HiltonBSD.com X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.6) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Cheers, This subject of building on one machine and distributing via NFS (/usr/src, /usr/obj) has come up again. Most writers are describing this as a "just works" type thing, but I have had problems in the past, that if still present, could foul up another's attempts to do this. Possibly some clarification is necessary for the list? In the *past* I have installed from my FreeBSD Services 4.5 DVD, then cvsupd and built world on my main "builder" workstation to 4.5-STABLE. This machine has processor optimizations in its make.conf during its update from 4.5-RELEASE to 4.5-STABLE like: /etc/make.conf on PIII "builder" machine --------------------snip---------------------- CPUTYPE=i686 CFLAGS= -O -pipe COPTFLAGS= -O -pipe --------------------snip---------------------- Now "builder" is up to date, and I want to build for a P60 machine on my LAN. I change the /etc/make.conf on "builder" to this processor type: --------------------snip---------------------- CPUTYPE=i586 CFLAGS= -O -pipe COPTFLAGS= -O -pipe --------------------snip---------------------- I cd to /usr/obj and chflags and rm -rf its contents, then cd /usr/src and make cleandir twice. "builder" is ready to build for the P60 box, so I run buildworld and buildkernel KERNCONF=P60kernel. Now I NFS mount from "P60" to "builder" (/usr/obj /usr/src) and on "P60" from /usr/src I invoke the: make installkernel KERNCONF=P60kernel This runs through OK. Now on "P60" I invoke the "make installworld" and it dies very early in the installworld process. I do not have the exact error handy, but it seems to involve basic build/install tools failing due to hosed processor optimizations for a PIII in tools that are being used to installworld on a P60 processor. The same P60 box will update fine if I put the src on it and run the buildworld/kernel/installworld process locally. And another PIII based system will work fine when I tune the make.conf's and do the update via NFS mounting to "builder". Is this a know problem (at least by me :-), and has it been corrected in more recent versions (4.6 or "better"). If not, possibly an addition to this thread might help someone else save some time in the future? I have read in other threads that the processor optimizations via make.conf are not that important for performance enhancement at this time, but that GCC 3.1 will change this in the near future (FreeBSD 5). If this problem that I have had in the past with using processor optimizations on a "builder" machine, then NFS mounting client machines to for updating is valid, would this not become a more commen problem seen on the lists? Regards, Stephen Hilton nospam@hiltonbsd.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Aug 15 7: 6: 6 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A589A37B400 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 07:06:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.pressenter.com (hermes.pressenter.com [209.224.20.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C20BB43E6A for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 07:06:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nospam@hiltonbsd.com) Received: from [209.224.35.188] (helo=daggar.sbgnet.net) by hermes.pressenter.com with smtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 17fLGD-00035g-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 09:06:01 -0500 Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 09:06:00 -0500 From: Stephen Hilton To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Need instructions: build kernel on one machine; install on another Message-Id: <20020815090600.6db70420.nospam@hiltonbsd.com> In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020813084802.037d9498@magpie.zpfe.com> References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020813084802.037d9498@magpie.zpfe.com> Organization: HiltonBSD.com X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.6) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Cheers, This subject of building on one machine and distributing via NFS (/usr/src, /usr/obj) has come up again. Most writers are describing this as a "just works" type thing, but I have had problems in the past, that if still present, could foul up another's attempts to do this. Possibly some clarification is necessary for the list? In the *past* I have installed from my FreeBSD Services 4.5 DVD, then cvsupd and built world on my main "builder" workstation to 4.5-STABLE. This machine has processor optimizations in its make.conf during its update from 4.5-RELEASE to 4.5-STABLE like: /etc/make.conf on PIII "builder" machine --------------------snip---------------------- CPUTYPE=i686 CFLAGS= -O -pipe COPTFLAGS= -O -pipe --------------------snip---------------------- Now "builder" is up to date, and I want to build for a P60 machine on my LAN. I change the /etc/make.conf on "builder" to this processor type: --------------------snip---------------------- CPUTYPE=i586 CFLAGS= -O -pipe COPTFLAGS= -O -pipe --------------------snip---------------------- I cd to /usr/obj and chflags and rm -rf its contents, then cd /usr/src and make cleandir twice. "builder" is ready to build for the P60 box, so I run buildworld and buildkernel KERNCONF=P60kernel. Now I NFS mount from "P60" to "builder" (/usr/obj /usr/src) and on "P60" from /usr/src I invoke the: make installkernel KERNCONF=P60kernel This runs through OK. Now on "P60" I invoke the "make installworld" and it dies very early in the installworld process. I do not have the exact error handy, but it seems to involve basic build/install tools failing due to hosed processor optimizations for a PIII in tools that are being used to installworld on a P60 processor. The same P60 box will update fine if I put the src on it and run the buildworld/kernel/installworld process locally. And another PIII based system will work fine when I tune the make.conf's and do the update via NFS mounting to "builder". Is this a know problem (at least by me :-), and has it been corrected in more recent versions (4.6 or "better"). If not, possibly an addition to this thread might help someone else save some time in the future? I have read in other threads that the processor optimizations via make.conf are not that important for performance enhancement at this time, but that GCC 3.1 will change this in the near future (FreeBSD 5). If this problem that I have had in the past with using processor optimizations on a "builder" machine, then NFS mounting client machines with older processors to "builder" for updating is valid, would this not become a more common problem seen on the lists as more people start using processor flags in their make.conf's? Regards, Stephen Hilton nospam@hiltonbsd.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Aug 15 7:15:12 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94EAC37B408 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 07:15:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web13007.mail.yahoo.com (web13007.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.174.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D1FF43E7B for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 07:15:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from niteskyguy@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20020815141504.70601.qmail@web13007.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [207.43.191.130] by web13007.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 07:15:04 PDT Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 07:15:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Subject: Re: cdrom: device not configured error To: Larry Rosenman Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <1029381630.402.1.camel@lerlaptop.lerctr.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Yes, here is what I have in /dev: # ls -l acd* crw-r----- 4 root operator 117, 0 Aug 14 15:58 acd0a crw-r----- 4 root operator 117, 0 Aug 14 15:58 acd0c crw-r----- 4 root operator 117, 8 Aug 14 15:58 acd1a crw-r----- 4 root operator 117, 8 Aug 14 15:58 acd1c Thanks, Doug --- Larry Rosenman wrote: > Do you have /dev/acd0c and /dev/acd0a with the same minor number, > I.E: > > $ cd /dev > $ ls -l acd* > crw-r----- 4 root operator 117, 0 Aug 11 21:24 acd0a > crw-r----- 4 root operator 117, 0 Aug 11 21:24 acd0c > crw-r----- 4 root operator 117, 8 Aug 11 21:24 acd1a > crw-r----- 4 root operator 117, 8 Aug 11 21:24 acd1c > $ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs http://www.hotjobs.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Aug 15 7:16:54 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 588F437B400 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 07:16:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.gactr.uga.edu (mail.gactr.uga.edu [128.192.37.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3DCB43E70 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 07:16:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from robin.blanchard@georgiacenter.org) Received: (qmail 44282 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2002 14:16:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO georgiacenter.org) ([10.10.25.125]) (envelope-sender ) by mail.servers.gactr.gc.nat (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 15 Aug 2002 14:16:42 -0000 Message-ID: <3D5BB7CA.6070205@georgiacenter.org> Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 10:16:42 -0400 From: "Robin P. Blanchard" Organization: Georgia Center for Continuing Education User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020620 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Hilton , stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Need instructions: build kernel on one machine; install on another References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020813084802.037d9498@magpie.zpfe.com> <20020815090600.6db70420.nospam@hiltonbsd.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG from an earlier discussion (initiated by me): "You *MUST* use a HOST SYSTEM compiled for the LOWEST processor you want to installworld to. There are a few places (strip for one) that link in /usr/lib/libc.a and NOT the one from /usr/obj/... " Thus you can't use an i686 optimized world host box to install a lower optimized /usr/obj to. > I change the /etc/make.conf on "builder" to this processor type: > --------------------snip---------------------- > CPUTYPE=i586 > CFLAGS= -O -pipe > COPTFLAGS= -O -pipe > --------------------snip---------------------- > > Now on "P60" I invoke the "make installworld" and it dies > very early in the installworld process. I do not have the > exact error handy, but it seems to involve basic build/install > tools failing due to hosed processor optimizations for a PIII > in tools that are being used to installworld on a P60 processor. -- ---------------------------------------- Robin P. Blanchard Systems Integration Specialist Georgia Center for Continuing Education fon: 706.542.2404 <|> fax: 706.542.6546 ---------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Aug 15 7:22:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31ACB37B401 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 07:22:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lerlaptop.iadfw.net (lerlaptop.iadfw.net [206.66.13.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C90B643E8A for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 07:22:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ler@lerctr.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lerlaptop.iadfw.net (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7FEM5Hq000682; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 09:22:05 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ler@lerctr.org) Subject: Re: Need instructions: build kernel on one machine; install on another From: Larry Rosenman To: "Robin P. Blanchard" Cc: Stephen Hilton , stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <3D5BB7CA.6070205@georgiacenter.org> References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020813084802.037d9498@magpie.zpfe.com> <20020815090600.6db70420.nospam@hiltonbsd.com> <3D5BB7CA.6070205@georgiacenter.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 15 Aug 2002 09:22:05 -0500 Message-Id: <1029421325.408.4.camel@lerlaptop.iadfw.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 09:16, Robin P. Blanchard wrote: > from an earlier discussion (initiated by me): > > "You *MUST* use a HOST SYSTEM compiled for the LOWEST processor you want > to installworld to. There are a few places (strip for one) that link in > /usr/lib/libc.a and NOT the one from /usr/obj/... " > > Thus you can't use an i686 optimized world host box to install a lower > optimized /usr/obj to. see also PR i386/30276 from me. > > > > > I change the /etc/make.conf on "builder" to this processor type: > > --------------------snip---------------------- > > CPUTYPE=i586 > > CFLAGS= -O -pipe > > COPTFLAGS= -O -pipe > > --------------------snip---------------------- > > > > Now on "P60" I invoke the "make installworld" and it dies > > very early in the installworld process. I do not have the > > exact error handy, but it seems to involve basic build/install > > tools failing due to hosed processor optimizations for a PIII > > in tools that are being used to installworld on a P60 processor. > > > -- > ---------------------------------------- > Robin P. Blanchard > Systems Integration Specialist > Georgia Center for Continuing Education > fon: 706.542.2404 <|> fax: 706.542.6546 > ---------------------------------------- > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Aug 15 7:34:19 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3095837B401 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 07:34:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.pressenter.com (hermes.pressenter.com [209.224.20.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77BE043E72 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 07:34:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nospam@hiltonbsd.com) Received: from [209.224.35.188] (helo=daggar.sbgnet.net) by hermes.pressenter.com with smtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 17fLhQ-0006cO-00; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 09:34:09 -0500 Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 09:34:07 -0500 From: Stephen Hilton To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: Larry Rosenman Subject: Re: Need instructions: build kernel on one machine; install on another Message-Id: <20020815093407.67b45a5e.nospam@hiltonbsd.com> In-Reply-To: <1029421325.408.4.camel@lerlaptop.iadfw.net> References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020813084802.037d9498@magpie.zpfe.com> <20020815090600.6db70420.nospam@hiltonbsd.com> <3D5BB7CA.6070205@georgiacenter.org> <1029421325.408.4.camel@lerlaptop.iadfw.net> Organization: HiltonBSD.com X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.6) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 15 Aug 2002 09:22:05 -0500 Larry Rosenman wrote: > On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 09:16, Robin P. Blanchard wrote: > > from an earlier discussion (initiated by me): > > > > "You *MUST* use a HOST SYSTEM compiled for the LOWEST processor you want > > to installworld to. There are a few places (strip for one) that link in > > /usr/lib/libc.a and NOT the one from /usr/obj/... " > > > > Thus you can't use an i686 optimized world host box to install a lower > > optimized /usr/obj to. > > see also PR i386/30276 from me. > Larry, I agree, with FreeBSD having such an edge in performance on "older" hardware (sorry Intel and AMD :-) this is something to pursue. ------------------snip------------------ Fix Update build system to NOT include host libc.a in any tools that will be executed on the target system. ------------------snip------------------ Thanks for the information, Stephen Hilton nospam@hiltonbsd.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Aug 15 7:36:47 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3339937B400 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 07:36:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.pressenter.com (hermes.pressenter.com [209.224.20.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B730E43E3B for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 07:36:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nospam@hiltonbsd.com) Received: from [209.224.35.188] (helo=daggar.sbgnet.net) by hermes.pressenter.com with smtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 17fLjv-0006xq-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 09:36:44 -0500 Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 09:36:43 -0500 From: Stephen Hilton To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Need instructions: build kernel on one machine; install on another Message-Id: <20020815093643.2422e71b.nospam@hiltonbsd.com> Organization: HiltonBSD.com X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.6) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG David, Wow that was fast, I fumble fingered and posted the question to the list twice with a small change to the ending statement, but your answer came before I even finishing fumble fingering :-) Thanks for the info, as a follow-up, what about ports that use processor optimizations, especially multi-media related programs. Can they use these performance enhancements without support in the "world" and "kernel" already "built-in"? Regards, Stephen Hilton nospam@hiltonbsd.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Aug 15 8: 3:18 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BF2D37B400 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 08:03:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jack.clarksys.com (jack.clarksys.com [64.70.36.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C42143E42 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 08:03:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from max@clarksys.com) Received: (qmail 1302 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2002 15:03:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO princess) (4.47.62.87) by jack.clarksys.com with SMTP; 15 Aug 2002 15:03:06 -0000 Message-ID: <003501c2446c$e6dc7700$6445a8c0@princess> From: "Max Clark" To: , Subject: Loosing network connection repeatedly without an identifiable cause Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 08:03:23 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I am experiancing some incredibly odd behaivor with a 4.6-Stable box. I recently moved this machine to a different network replacing an old computer. Without obvious cause I lose connectivity to this server. I initially thought that there was another device trying to advertise the same IP address (odd because I swapped IPs when I swapped machines) so I changed the IP addresss to something that I knew wasn't in use and cleared arp on my router. Same behavior, so I figured bad network cable/hub port so I replaced, same behavior. I now have a serial console cable on this machine, after I lost connectivity again tonight I connected on the console. ifconfig -a shows the interface up, the machine hasn't rebooted. The only thing that I can see that is odd was an arp -a didn't show neighbor computers nor the local interface ([permanent]) entry. I'm kind of at a loss as to what to try next. This machine worked fine on my home LAN. Below is the dmesg, I'm using the fxp interface, I added the ed today out of despiration. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance! -Max fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet x.x.x.4 netmask 0xffffffc0 broadcast x.x.x.63 ether 00:90:27:de:8c:dc media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP) status: active lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 Copyright (c) 1992-2002 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE #1: Wed Aug 14 12:31:50 PDT 2002 root@jack.clarksys.com:/usr/src/sys/compile/jack Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Pentium III/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron (497.44-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x673 Stepping = 3 Features=0x383fbff real memory = 402644992 (393208K bytes) avail memory = 388231168 (379132K bytes) Changing APIC ID for IO APIC #0 from 0 to 2 on chip Programming 24 pins in IOAPIC #0 IOAPIC #0 intpin 2 -> irq 0 FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor motherboard cpu0 (BSP): apic id: 1, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee00000 cpu1 (AP): apic id: 0, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee00000 io0 (APIC): apic id: 2, version: 0x00170011, at 0xfec00000 Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc033b000. Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled md0: Malloc disk Using $PIR table, 10 entries at 0xc00fc420 npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard IOAPIC #0 intpin 19 -> irq 2 IOAPIC #0 intpin 17 -> irq 7 IOAPIC #0 intpin 18 -> irq 10 IOAPIC #0 intpin 20 -> irq 11 pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pci1: at 0.0 pcib2: at device 2.0 on pci0 IOAPIC #0 intpin 16 -> irq 13 pci2: on pcib2 ahc0: port 0xdc00-0xdcff mem 0xf9fff000 -0xf9ffffff irq 13 at device 11.0 on pci2 aic7890/91: Ultra2 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 32/253 SCBs isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xffa0-0xffaf at device 7.1 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 pci0: at 7.2 irq 2 Timecounter "PIIX" frequency 3579545 Hz chip1: port 0x850-0x85f at device 7. 3 on pci0 pci0: (vendor=0x12de, dev=0x0200) at 13.0 irq 7 pcib3: at device 14.0 on pci0 pci3: on pcib3 mlx0: mem 0xf7000000-0xf7001fff irq 10 at devic e 14.1 on pci0 mlx0: DAC960PRL, 1 channel, firmware 4.07-0-07, 16MB RAM mlxd0: on mlx0 mlxd0: 70006MB (143372288 sectors) RAID 5 (online) ahc1: port 0xc800-0xc8ff mem 0xfe102000-0x fe102fff irq 2 at device 16.0 on pci0 aic7899: Ultra160 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 32/253 SCBs ahc2: port 0xc400-0xc4ff mem 0xfe101000-0x fe101fff irq 11 at device 16.1 on pci0 aic7899: Ultra160 Wide Channel B, SCSI Id=7, 32/253 SCBs fxp0: port 0xcc40-0xcc7f mem 0xfe000000-0xfe0f ffff,0xfe100000-0xfe100fff irq 11 at device 17.0 on pci0 fxp0: Ethernet address 00:90:27:de:8c:dc inphy0: on miibus0 inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto orm0:
hello all,
 
    want join freebsd = statble
    current install freebsd 4.4 and = 4.6 on=20 internet webserver
    in thailand
 
support dept.
http://www.theserverbiz.com
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus = Free.
Checked=20 by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: = 6.0.381 /=20 Virus Database: 214 - Release Date: = 02/08/2002
------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C244DE.64372800-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Aug 15 14:48:23 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E7C537B400 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 14:48:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sentinel.vg.tzo.com (h179n2fls32o972.telia.com [217.208.226.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E8D843E72 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 14:48:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Daniel.Eriksson@computer.org) Received: from gadget (gadget [192.168.168.3]) by sentinel.vg.tzo.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g7FLm5gV009580; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 23:48:10 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Daniel.Eriksson@computer.org) From: "Daniel Eriksson" To: Cc: "'Jim Frost'" Subject: RE: FreeBSD 4.6 rl0 and xl0 watchdog timeout problems (and solution) Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 23:48:06 +0200 Organization: Virtual Gadgets Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 In-Reply-To: <1029102290.9472.188.camel@snowball.frostbytes.com> Importance: Normal Disposition-Notification-To: "Daniel Eriksson" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [Sent to both Jim and the mailing list.] Jim, Not that it in any way helps you, but FreeBSD is not the only OS sensitive to IRQ sharing. Even Windows has its problems, like trying to get a Soundblaster Live! card to share IRQ with the USB controller. Depending on the motherboard and driver version it will either BSOD on you or just lock up without even a blue screen. As to your complaint about having to manually select every package: I see this as a conservative design decision. There are a bunch of packages that will install applications or scripts that weakens the security of your box, so by not defaulting to install everything (even making it difficult to select everything) like some Linux distros do, you automatically get a safer, more secure system. While I agree that the installer could be cuter and fluffier, I see nothing in it that really ticks me off. It's easy to use, gets the work done and I've seen Unix newbies go through it without any real problems. I cannot comment on the X install, because I usually only install the basics during the initial installation. I install X and most other applications from ports as soon as I've done a full cvsup (to ensure I get the latest version). Good luck with your new server! /Daniel > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG] On Behalf Of Jim Frost > Sent: den 11 augusti 2002 23:45 > To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: FreeBSD 4.6 rl0 and xl0 watchdog timeout problems > (and solution) > > > I'm posting this mostly so that someone who runs into the same problem > can perhaps find the message. > > Short version: Try a different slot. For some reason BSD doesn't see > interrupts in slots that share PCI interrupts. > > Long version: > > I recently bought a new PC to use as a server to replace an > aging Cobalt > Qube2. The Qube was a great little box ... or it was until the last > security update which broke something in the kernel such that the box > hangs regularly. Sun's "support", even their paid "support", has a > couple of workarounds that reduce the frequency but they are > clearly not > interested in fixing it, and the whole reason I bought the box was so > that I could manage it with point-and-click; I don't really feel like > tracking down sources and building my own kernels anymore. > > Anyway, one of the reasons for using the Qube2 is that it's > not Windows > and it's not Intel so almost nobody's attack scripts will work even if > the machine has a hole I haven't patched yet on a service that the > firewall and machine configuration exposes. > > Not wanting to spend the money on a newer Cobalt box given the crappy > support I got with the one I have, I decided to give in and > run an Intel > box again. No way was I going to run Windows on an exposed > box, and I'd > prefer not to run Red Hat (as I do on my laptop) because it's > the first > target of the script kiddies. BSD seemed like a good solution and one > which I'm fairly familiar with from days past. Besides, my pro-BSD > buddies raved about how fast and stable it is. > > So I bought some fairly generic PC from a local supplier: an MSI board > of some sort with a hunk o' RAM and disk, a 1.6GHz P4, and a DLink > DFE-530TX+ ethercard. Nothing special these days, but not > junk either, > and way more capability than I really need on my home server > (hey, that > Qube2 was working just fine until Sun broke it). The local PC company > couldn't guarantee the system would run FreeBSD but they burned it in > with WinXP so at least I knew the parts worked, and the net tells me > that all this stuff should work on BSD. Besides, at this point the > UNIXen have pretty much got the PC hardware figured out, right? > > I ordered up a FreeBSD 4.6 subscription from bsdmall and got to > installing it. First impression: That installer sucks ass. I mean, > sucks like the stuff we used to get from Sun in the 3.x days. Sucks > worse than SysVR3 did. Sucks sucks sucks. Never mind that the X11 > configuration hung and I had to give up on that and rerun the install > and skip it (Red Hat has got that /nailed/ at this point), the thing > that really pisses me off is that I just wanted it to install > everything > on the disk. What the hell, the disk space is cheap and I am not sure > what I'm going to want. So far as I can tell there's no way > to do that, > so I had to check off like a thousand packages one at a time. That > SUCKS. Primitive, irritating, and gawdawful easy to fix. Wassup with > that? > > Not an auspicious start, but I still managed to get the whole install > done in about half the time of any Windows product I've > installed in the > last seven or eight years, so it's not /that/ big a deal. It > just looks > way lame relative to any Linux release we've seen since like 1997. > > Anyway, I fired it up and got "rl0: watchdog timeout" errors. Shit. > I've seen those before from waaaay back when SunOS was my favorite > system, and it meant that the ethernet cable fell out. The > man page for > the rl driver says that that's probably what it is. Problem is, the > cabling checks out: it was showing good connection lights on > both ends. > Just to be sure I pulled known-good cabling from other stuff. > Still no > go. > > I thought maybe the thing was incorrectly sensing the media; > I still run > 10baseT because it's here and it works and I don't see why I should > spend money on a new hub. ifconfig said it autoconfigured to > 10baseT/UTP but just to be sure I forced the config. Same problem. > > Ok, I've used the various UNIXen enough to know that they're often > sensitive to card firmware versions; maybe the 530TX+ has new firmware > that screwed it up. So I picked up a 3c905 card and threw it > in. Same > problem. > > That didn't leave much. At this point I figured it's an interrupt > problem of some sort and started looking at the PCI > configuration in the > BIOS. I remember something about NT et al needing something or other > disabled to work on new motherboards and figure that maybe > the PC vendor > set that up, but I don't see anything out of the ordinary. > > But while I was in there I noticed that four slots share two interrupt > configurations: Slots 1 and 3 share one, and slots 2 and 6 share > another. Hmm. The ethercard is in slot 3, one of the shared slots. > > On a hunch I move the ethercard to slot 4 and reboot. Voila, > works like > a champ. > > I'd be interested in an explanation if someone has one, and if nobody > does then I'd be willing to help track down some details to fix it so > some other poor schmuck doesn't waste a lot of time tracking it down. > > So far this has been way more effort than it should have been and I > haven't even gotten to configuring the services I need. The > only reason > I didn't just dump it in favor of RH7.3 was that my discs are at work > right now. But, now that it's working, I'm going to proceed and hope > for the best. > > Hell, if nothing else it boots a lot faster than Linux. > > jim frost > jimf@frostbytes.com > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Aug 15 14:54:43 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 667D637B401 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 14:54:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from frostbytes.com (dsl092-065-149.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.65.149]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8434C43E6E for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 14:54:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jimf@frostbytes.com) Received: from snowball.frostbytes.com (snowball.frostbytes.com [192.168.1.193]) by frostbytes.com (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id RAA03949; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 17:53:43 -0400 Subject: RE: FreeBSD 4.6 rl0 and xl0 watchdog timeout problems (and solution) From: Jim Frost To: Daniel Eriksson Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6) Date: 15 Aug 2002 17:55:14 -0400 Message-Id: <1029448514.14968.76.camel@snowball.frostbytes.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 17:48, Daniel Eriksson wrote: > Not that it in any way helps you, but FreeBSD is not the only OS > sensitive to IRQ sharing. Even Windows has its problems, like trying to > get a Soundblaster Live! card to share IRQ with the USB controller. > Depending on the motherboard and driver version it will either BSOD on > you or just lock up without even a blue screen. Yup; now that I know it's an IRQ conflict I'm ok with that ... I just didn't have any way of knowing that that was the problem (irq12 was not reported as being used by any device other than my ethercard). What I had been confronted with seemed bizarre ... card works in one slot, doesn't work in another. I do miss the days of IRQ jumpers, at least you knew what was using what. > As to your complaint about having to manually select every package: I > see this as a conservative design decision. There are a bunch of > packages that will install applications or scripts that weakens the > security of your box, so by not defaulting to install everything (even > making it difficult to select everything) like some Linux distros do, > you automatically get a safer, more secure system. That's fine with me, but there should be a way to /tell/ the installer that you want to select (and de-select) them all. Tediously selecting hundreds upon hundreds of checkboxes individually is ridiculous. In comparison to every other installer I've used in the last five or six years this one is quite primitive, and irritatingly so. jim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Aug 15 15: 8:41 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC0DC37B400 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 15:08:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alcanet.com.au (mail2.alcanet.com.au [203.62.196.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0995543E4A for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 15:08:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au) Received: from sydsmtp01.alcatel.com.au (IDENT:root@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alcanet.com.au (8.12.4/8.12.4/Alcanet1.3) with ESMTP id g7FM8UZN031077; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 08:08:30 +1000 Received: from gsmx07.alcatel.com.au ([139.188.20.247]) by sydsmtp01.alcatel.com.au (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.10) with ESMTP id 2002081608083003:96015 ; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 08:08:30 +1000 Received: from gsmx07.alcatel.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gsmx07.alcatel.com.au (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7FM8Thh081050; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 08:08:29 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au) Received: (from jeremyp@localhost) by gsmx07.alcatel.com.au (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g7FM8T2p081049; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 08:08:29 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au) Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 08:08:29 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: andrew.li@alcatel.com.au Subject: M_DEVBUF running out of space. Message-ID: <20020816080829.T72938@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, andrew.li@alcatel.com.au Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on SYDSMTP01/AlcatelAustralia(Release 5.0.10 |March 22, 2002) at 16/08/2002 08:08:30, Serialize by Router on SYDSMTP01/AlcatelAustralia(Release 5.0.10 |March 22, 2002) at 16/08/2002 08:08:30, Serialize complete at 16/08/2002 08:08:30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I just upgraded a machine to -STABLE as of about 3 days ago and am now getting "camq_init: - cannot malloc array!" reported on the console. vmstat suggests that M_DEVBUF has reached its limit: Type InUse MemUse HighUse Limit Requests Limit Limit Size(s) devbuf1293222 20988K 20988K 20988K 9050825 2 0 16,32,64,128,256,512,1K,2K,4K,8K,32K,64K,128K When I reboot, devbuf returns to a sane value: devbuf 870 788K 788K 20988K 18891 0 0 16,32,64,128,256,512,1K,2K,4K,8K,32K,64K,128K It looks like something is leaking M_DEVBUF objects, but given that every device driver in the system uses M_DEVBUF, it mightn't be easy to locate. Has anyone else seen anything like this? The system was previously running a 4.6-PRERELEASE from mid-May and did not report any problems. It's a Compaq Proliant 1850R and the full dmesg is: Copyright (c) 1992-2002 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE #1: Wed Aug 14 13:56:26 EST 2002 root@aalp03.alcatel.com.au:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/wansim Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193160 Hz Timecounter "TSC" frequency 598170326 Hz CPU: Pentium III/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron (598.17-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x673 Stepping = 3 Features=0x383f9ff real memory = 134201344 (131056K bytes) avail memory = 127213568 (124232K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc0352000. VESA: v2.0, 1024k memory, flags:0x0, mode table:0xc02f59e2 (1000022) VESA: ATI MACH64 Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 sym0: <875> port 0x2000-0x20ff mem 0xc6aff000-0xc6afffff,0xc6afaf00-0xc6afafff irq 10 at device 6.0 on pci0 sym0: No NVRAM, ID 7, Fast-20, SE, parity checking sym1: <875> port 0x2400-0x24ff mem 0xc6afe000-0xc6afefff,0xc6afae00-0xc6afaeff irq 11 at device 6.1 on pci0 sym1: No NVRAM, ID 7, Fast-20, SE, parity checking tl0: port 0x3040-0x304f mem 0xc6afacf0-0xc6afacff irq 15 at device 7.0 on pci0 tl0: Ethernet address: 00:50:8b:dc:8a:75 miibus0: on tl0 lxtphy0: on miibus0 lxtphy0: 100baseFX, 100baseFX-FDX, 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto tlphy0: on miibus0 tlphy0: 10base2/BNC, 10base5/AUI pci0: at 8.0 pci0: (vendor=0x0e11, dev=0xa0f0) at 9.0 pci0: (vendor=0x114f, dev=0x0004) at 13.0 irq 5 fxp0: port 0x3000-0x303f mem 0xc6b00000-0xc6bfffff,0xc6afc000-0xc6afcfff irq 15 at device 15.0 on pci0 fxp0: Ethernet address 00:50:8b:69:ac:12 inphy0: on miibus1 inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto isp0: port 0x2c00-0x2cff mem 0xc6afb000-0xc6afbfff irq 15 at device 18.0 on pci0 isab0: at device 20.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xf100-0xf10f at device 20.1 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 pci0: at 20.2 irq 0 chip1: at device 20.3 on pci0 orm0: