From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Mar 13 06:22:52 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1355DACD236 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 06:22:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@ozzmosis.com) Received: from homiemail-a58.g.dreamhost.com (sub5.mail.dreamhost.com [208.113.200.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00952A6A for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 06:22:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@ozzmosis.com) Received: from homiemail-a58.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a58.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 064127D805B for ; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 22:22:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=ozzmosis.com; h=date:from :to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=ozzmosis.com ; bh=SMro1KVRm4U0PriG34OYPfLQNg8=; b=jzNF5TvQMOQeELd91a7d/eCE8O1 Gz9pbqY+deGLmOthoTcbSqGdkEGqI4P8XpVTTAoZ40U4JLOLY9AcqUZSToyTxFCT ohCDO9QiLU3fOjg8ATVVh2d0QL4tMeADFdDc9eRUlNuob6aq9wndVy9cNbcYAz2o hgglbben19jqA2oQ= Received: from blizzard.ozzmosis.com (220-253-30-44.dyn.iinet.net.au [220.253.30.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: relay@ozzmosis.com) by homiemail-a58.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 99BCD7D8058 for ; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 22:22:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by blizzard.ozzmosis.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0FBDFDD0; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 17:22:40 +1100 (AEDT) Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 17:22:39 +1100 From: andrew clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: WARNING: $xyz is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). Message-ID: <20160313062239.GA29540@ozzmosis.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 06:22:52 -0000 I notice on FreeBSD 10.2-REL (also 10.3-RC2), executing: service -e results in the following appended to /var/log/messages: Mar 13 17:09:57 blizzard ozzmosis: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $growfs_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). Mar 13 17:09:57 blizzard ozzmosis: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $ is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). Mar 13 17:09:57 blizzard ozzmosis: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $tcsd_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). Mar 13 17:09:58 blizzard ozzmosis: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $mpd_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). Mar 13 17:09:58 blizzard ozzmosis: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $poudriered_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). Mar 13 17:09:58 blizzard ozzmosis: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $mdnsresponderposix_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). Mar 13 17:09:58 blizzard ozzmosis: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $mdnsd_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). Mar 13 17:09:58 blizzard ozzmosis: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $dbus_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). Mar 13 17:09:58 blizzard ozzmosis: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $avahi_daemon_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). Mar 13 17:09:58 blizzard ozzmosis: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $cupsd_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). Mar 13 17:09:58 blizzard ozzmosis: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $avahi_dnsconfd_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). "$ is not set properly" looks like a bug, but I'm wondering whether these messages are necessary at all? For example, I don't have growfs_enable set at all in rc.conf, so I'd have thought that /usr/sbin/service would treat this as the same as growfs_enable="NO". Also, "not set properly" does not have the same meaning as "not set", so at the very least the warning is erroneous. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Mar 13 12:14:08 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F02F4ACE5D5 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 12:14:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@yandex.com) Received: from forward6o.cmail.yandex.net (forward6o.cmail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1a72::291]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "forwards.mail.yandex.net", Issuer "Yandex CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB7E8DBF for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 12:14:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@yandex.com) Received: from smtp11.mail.yandex.net (smtp11.mail.yandex.net [95.108.130.67]) by forward6o.cmail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 33DC221A03 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 15:13:54 +0300 (MSK) Received: from smtp11.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp11.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 03EFA7E0470 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 15:13:53 +0300 (MSK) Received: by smtp11.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id Iw5BCJz3gj-DqS8Y33j; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 15:13:52 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1457871233; bh=+PQWPH09GGyv3nWLkS6+3xU1e+j1e7B/wlPAcEsMfvY=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Date:Content-Type:X-Mailer: Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=RqLFmxnQPi0oROxr8bS2lXI+VEzQBhYoDdCba/0CnxmnybSgXaa+VayPVGVlEcd9E sbgY4ybCLnO7LfUXw+09wWFeMbiesgjH7OomPm4QkBM+AHN117snzvq/usDiMlVn1C DHqV7rbvyw7YLWJQb8aYjb39l2NRgK7tPvtRheNM= Authentication-Results: smtp11.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.com X-Yandex-ForeignMX: US X-Yandex-Suid-Status: 1 0 Message-ID: <1457871230.3715.2.camel@yandex.com> Subject: FreeBSD 10.3 and bluetooth From: Stari Karp To: FreeBSD Questions Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 08:13:50 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 12:14:09 -0000 Hi! I am using Apple Magic Mouse from september last year with success (NOT just left and right click). Does anyone knows if is https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3778 included in coming FreeBSD 10.3 Release, please? Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Mar 13 13:48:08 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1789EACDC8E for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 13:48:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B334F5F for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 13:48:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id u2DDlv2i006986; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 00:47:57 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 00:47:57 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: andrew clarke cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WARNING: $xyz is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20160313232411.J61428@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 13:48:08 -0000 Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 614, Issue 8, Message: 3 On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 17:22:39 +1100 andrew clarke wrote: > I notice on FreeBSD 10.2-REL (also 10.3-RC2), executing: > > service -e > > results in the following appended to /var/log/messages: > > Mar 13 17:09:57 blizzard ozzmosis: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $growfs_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). > Mar 13 17:09:57 blizzard ozzmosis: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $ is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). > Mar 13 17:09:57 blizzard ozzmosis: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $tcsd_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). > Mar 13 17:09:58 blizzard ozzmosis: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $mpd_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). > Mar 13 17:09:58 blizzard ozzmosis: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $poudriered_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). > Mar 13 17:09:58 blizzard ozzmosis: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $mdnsresponderposix_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). > Mar 13 17:09:58 blizzard ozzmosis: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $mdnsd_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). > Mar 13 17:09:58 blizzard ozzmosis: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $dbus_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). > Mar 13 17:09:58 blizzard ozzmosis: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $avahi_daemon_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). > Mar 13 17:09:58 blizzard ozzmosis: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $cupsd_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). > Mar 13 17:09:58 blizzard ozzmosis: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $avahi_dnsconfd_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). > > "$ is not set properly" looks like a bug, but I'm wondering whether > these messages are necessary at all? Indeed. Just to check for a regression, I ran the same on stable/9 (October). Most of these are enabled in /etc/defaults/rc.conf, and everything specifically enabled in rc.conf is there: (*) smithi@x200:~/planotes % service -e /etc/rc.d/hostid /etc/rc.d/hostid_save /etc/rc.d/cleanvar /etc/rc.d/ip6addrctl /etc/rc.d/devd /etc/rc.d/newsyslog /etc/rc.d/syslogd /etc/rc.d/dmesg /etc/rc.d/virecover /etc/rc.d/motd /etc/rc.d/ntpd * /etc/rc.d/powerd * /etc/rc.d/rwho * /etc/rc.d/moused * /usr/local/etc/rc.d/dbus * /usr/local/etc/rc.d/hald * /etc/rc.d/sshd * /etc/rc.d/sendmail /etc/rc.d/cron /etc/rc.d/mixer /etc/rc.d/gptboot /etc/rc.d/bgfsck I checked that with % grep '="YES"' /etc/rc.conf /etc/defaults/rc.conf And a similar surprise here, so this is not new behaviour. Perhaps you were the very first person ever to use service -e AND read messages :) smithi@x200:~/planotes % tail -24 /var/log/messages [..] Mar 12 05:30:33 x200 kernel: acpi_lid0: Lid closed Mar 13 23:16:52 x200 smithi: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $mpd_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). Mar 13 23:16:52 x200 smithi: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $uuidd_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). Mar 13 23:16:52 x200 smithi: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $webcamd_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). Mar 13 23:16:52 x200 smithi: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $svnserve_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). Mar 13 23:16:52 x200 smithi: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $gpsd_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). Mar 13 23:16:52 x200 smithi: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $gkrellmd_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). Mar 13 23:16:52 x200 smithi: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $smartd_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). Mar 13 23:16:52 x200 smithi: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $slpd_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). Mar 13 23:16:52 x200 smithi: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $saned_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). Mar 13 23:16:52 x200 smithi: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $rsyncd_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). Mar 13 23:16:52 x200 smithi: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $mysql_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). Mar 13 23:16:52 x200 smithi: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $mdnsd_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). Mar 13 23:16:52 x200 smithi: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $lircd_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). Mar 13 23:16:52 x200 smithi: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $kdm4_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). Mar 13 23:16:52 x200 smithi: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $ffserver1_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). Mar 13 23:16:52 x200 smithi: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $ffserver_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). Mar 13 23:16:52 x200 smithi: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $avahi_daemon_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). Mar 13 23:16:52 x200 smithi: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $avahi_dnsconfd_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). > For example, I don't have growfs_enable set at all in rc.conf, so I'd > have thought that /usr/sbin/service would treat this as the same as > growfs_enable="NO". zero (0) of those above are enabled here, nor are they in defaults, and only 2 are installed (but not startup-enabled) gkrellmd and smartd. Perhaps these are 'just' complaints about the adjudged correctness of these scripts, for debugging? That was run as a (wheel) user; I didn't really expect it to work, though -e shouldn't try to DO anything. So I tried it as root: Mar 13 23:16:52 x200 smithi: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $avahi_dnsconfd_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). Mar 14 00:07:04 x200 su: smithi to root on /dev/pts/6 Mar 14 00:07:13 x200 smithi: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: $mpd_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). [.. same lot again ..] > Also, "not set properly" does not have the same meaning as "not set", > so at the very least the warning is erroneous. Nothing in service(8) /-e suggests this behaviour to me at all. Looks like you've won first prize: a hot date with bugzilla :) cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Mar 13 20:53:42 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E432EACFE01 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 20:53:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) Received: from BLU004-OMC4S26.hotmail.com (blu004-omc4s26.hotmail.com [65.55.111.165]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7048F69 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 20:53:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) Received: from BLU436-SMTP211 ([65.55.111.137]) by BLU004-OMC4S26.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Sun, 13 Mar 2016 13:52:35 -0700 X-TMN: [12SsvqsS0MzyWrQOn29UP/00fid0RSkr] X-Originating-Email: [carmel_ny@outlook.com] Message-ID: X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at scorpio.seibercom.net Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 16:52:29 -0400 From: Carmel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: mouht r/w partition with ZFS Organization: Seibercom NET X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.28; i686-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Mar 2016 20:52:35.0023 (UTC) FILETIME=[4520ADF0:01D17D6A] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 20:53:43 -0000 I made a serious error in my rc.conf file. I was trying to configure a wireless network. Anyway, upon boot-up, a message pops up that the network was created and then the system freezes. Nothing works, and I have to manually shut the system down. Now, I can get onto the system in single use mood, but the system is read-only. I have tried "mount -a", but that does not help. This is a ZFS filesystem. How can I get read/write access to the files, rc.conf specifically? -- Carmel From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Mar 13 20:58:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA08CACFF33 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 20:58:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bradleythughes@fastmail.fm) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FDCCB3 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 20:58:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bradleythughes@fastmail.fm) Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C525820A5D for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 16:58:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 13 Mar 2016 16:58:22 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=ibsSJglBamyxyRZKnZPvhDCRA1Q=; b=p4bHGW /Ud2mIh7bq461z4H5y68k181FHf8m2x1ELeWNMTnhLOPrBMua0NW/7CORqQA9ySp A/wSPkLNcOTm+BB8PWP7/i4WGvEFtW3YRC3phWRaK3KbFK5pyKHo2+REbH0a7NHL lxVaAPEgwmdIz096JNQ+h98wVdh4c/msIJWcE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=ibsSJglBamyxyRZ KnZPvhDCRA1Q=; b=BejzXEKkF/S/QCvhC5DUrK70Azeau3ysGxwRLLo+ctS6Z0w 9QozeLuYhEXGlEf29KtOBqZob1FhblVDwAXT3T5VgMjIlW8+5nfrhgF0jAHECS0I U5oSi6ShrfFPzJAGw5jDQfyARVQ9ChsZFXNCDgCvux9xQC2qHtJzGtq5Lk8s= X-Sasl-enc: E39GtODxAhsYYKLRkh6g3pGu+iaVmI4Oh42HZqbnK8Gm 1457902702 Received: from [10.0.0.112] (ti0081a400-2676.bb.online.no [80.213.213.126]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2D2C968018D; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 16:58:22 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\)) Subject: Re: mouht r/w partition with ZFS From: "Bradley T. Hughes" In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 21:58:18 +0100 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <684CA226-DCF6-42D6-A551-69692D26D70A@fastmail.fm> References: To: Carmel X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 20:58:23 -0000 > On 13 Mar 2016, at 21:52, Carmel wrote: >=20 > Now, I can get onto the system in single use mood, but the system is > read-only. I have tried "mount -a", but that does not help. Note that `mount -a` doesn't affect already mounted filesystems. > This is a ZFS filesystem. How can I get read/write access to the = files, > rc.conf specifically? I'm assuming your /etc/rc.conf is on the root filesystem. In which case = you need to remount / read-write with `mount -uw /` -- Bradley T. Hughes bradleythughes@fastmail.fm From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Mar 13 21:02:04 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1021EACD59A for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 21:02:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tigersharke@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk0-x22a.google.com (mail-vk0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C05D5C59 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 21:02:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tigersharke@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id e6so187928660vkh.2 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 14:02:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=4prKKXK+/FlGFw/uGHNo18PM7X7PHuPb1PgV5vQo6Ks=; b=aHdu0eFgP64y0tPQJtcNrW33rcuCPHTpb1KXbY0BxJDwRlctI9bF3y0toXC7lR3fHT Ibsdb3dCwlkJ9LApoRgjCC/lgMCHn1o07FN7oHI8vffuDFAms6g4NXAi0xiHO14y/bth kb2R5C4/DdMzvphi8l5QErzBU3JYsgRiUGNLoZcD7RQGe5ALJuE3eklqy2+Zqg0YVa31 9CGw2pKie33yHI3cfOSX19nrt8LIFLaQ+U7ZIeFCB9MXoSwZiCRhmOnl1oXq0GVTQ+WL o17GO59wwZadIR5gsTAxtqIHFMXLLg+U3LuzT4r2rtuhOF0BFchL+Lh8gaXoXGBVa/ZZ 4Tzw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=4prKKXK+/FlGFw/uGHNo18PM7X7PHuPb1PgV5vQo6Ks=; b=Ihr/x9H7MdwQLJfaz3nzlDQ9alDbKiTx0hq+j1IMKhDUD+REU0tLZ9D09LOWwQR967 8zO9XLpxR2mfBJ+sveWo6+2DJ8WziD1mKsERaIScwypjY+NNpc8LM2rxA0nbAzFGp9Ni GnPHyuSfd46DQ1X6ngEZyooHyOnYE3fBW7vhB9AxAlu8t2xfjSrZQCH4Xy+s6B/5jlNM mduV54MuuRtVE5vImgA03Hgr2yT5p4SDkfIyxwUue93S+QccHYsq6OzSVAABNU9boODw XVkZzOdtaqaq99tF8dq87qZ/dvcl1jP/XEuT0BkypZj5b/L+wh/lwMKXGLDD+dCe6nFF Wi+A== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIGNztKDYMexZmS33kO34WzaL9qdguX+aLRlj/mcPZl8kiVqa2NxnSVBbtIHjF/2cU9umgvZJrP2CpnJw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.31.160.6 with SMTP id j6mr22229198vke.87.1457902922842; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 14:02:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.31.173.10 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 14:02:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 16:02:02 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: mouht r/w partition with ZFS From: Curt Dox To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 21:02:04 -0000 On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Carmel [Masked] < FWD-737RRYQMGNAYYCUADMTWQLTAN4ACIB6QCXQBOOKWUMWCGUZGIIQFYIIMEEYCQYBNIBDQUIDGEA4KAABA@opayq.com > wrote: > > --------------------------MaskMe--------------------------- > Safely received through a Masked Email. IF THIS IS SPAM, CLICK HERE TO > BLOCK THIS MASKED EMAIL: > > https://emails.abine.com/disableDisposable?fwd=FWD-737RRYQMGNAYYCUADMTWQLTAN4ACIB6QCXQBOOKWUMWCGUZGIIQFYIIMEEYCQYBNIBDQUIDGEA4KAABA@opayq.com > -------------------------By Abine-------------------------- > > > > I made a serious error in my rc.conf file. I was trying to configure a > wireless network. Anyway, upon boot-up, a message pops up that the > network was created and then the system freezes. Nothing works, and I > have to manually shut the system down. > > Now, I can get onto the system in single use mood, but the system is > read-only. I have tried "mount -a", but that does not help. > > This is a ZFS filesystem. How can I get read/write access to the files, > rc.conf specifically? > > -- > Carmel > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > mount -u / zfs mount -a I have been using the above after reboot into single user to complete my new kernel and world installs. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Mar 14 02:19:40 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0977EAD0D6D for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 02:19:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.wandersee@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ig0-f177.google.com (mail-ig0-f177.google.com [209.85.213.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6F7718B9 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 02:19:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.wandersee@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ig0-f177.google.com with SMTP id vf5so50729290igb.0 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 19:19:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=0IPE6vms7F71b5ytO0pcT2gwpxe10Ui/USHHEeXrEpE=; b=JBAXk6TbFyhEPPA4qTEBxFmNouWZcSnEvrGcvw/wJbwjMSjjShSgUB1zBEA8rwW3r5 V/yegBwRrlMkMjoPHCdoCREqgF7XL/iW5BfihiHtUsAsTEWvvsxOGu5jeLrU1++792vG 9k6mjbRK3OTBSY7OjmNGPSV3Ulw0w7MxbgYOtMVh+ZaTA/WOxRJCmVqZBZ7hW2eXFqYH JGbq+flKUTLpW05HadbdC7MECQCVdA7m/YjvPTHnk+ciZs+bs0g5poOlJVCiSu02Nrh6 z5nbof1cC+dqS7ylSSfWKyDBZFGE7nZtI5QXp8ruw8ZLCzFElKR2EDTJuraxQUWRkNur uz9g== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIKNfBKGAZXaK4J+FApSNo6H7bJCOyfACJF5z3Ykr9CpCRja9G37BomX6rywNxvYw== X-Received: by 10.50.13.101 with SMTP id g5mr15115444igc.31.1457911268394; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 16:21:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from WorkBox.Home.gmail.com (174-30-194-239.mpls.qwest.net. [174.30.194.239]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id be7sm5357829igb.1.2016.03.13.16.21.06 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 13 Mar 2016 16:21:07 -0700 (PDT) References: <684CA226-DCF6-42D6-A551-69692D26D70A@fastmail.fm> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.15; emacs 24.5.1 From: Brandon J. Wandersee To: "Bradley T. Hughes" Cc: Carmel , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mouht r/w partition with ZFS In-reply-to: <684CA226-DCF6-42D6-A551-69692D26D70A@fastmail.fm> Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 18:21:13 -0500 Message-ID: <868u1m2cd2.fsf@WorkBox.Home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 02:19:40 -0000 Bradley T. Hughes writes: >> This is a ZFS filesystem. How can I get read/write access to the files, >> rc.conf specifically? > > I'm assuming your /etc/rc.conf is on the root filesystem. In which case you need to remount / read-write with `mount -uw /` Perhaps a little better: `zfs set readonly=off ` Either should work in single-user mode, but changing the read-only status of a ZFS filesystem doesn't reaquire unmounting and re-mounting it. -- :: Brandon Wandersee :: brandon.wandersee@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Mar 14 13:42:59 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96097ACFCBD for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 13:42:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from buhara13@yahoo.com) Received: from nm12-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm12-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.213.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E9C7C8F for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 13:42:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from buhara13@yahoo.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1457962971; bh=40bBr3g4bSCOTQ/0f5rK7dvZn0Qvv/TNUGq3xk2m5So=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:References:From:Subject; b=sUObIE+F1KN8r/n9cQeZfiG6/b5F2ZwfB8sRiGDOroMLR97XsS0Ft7dfkhIebxEuRO829lzZ8oXpP3VJNRYcZwTVhpcM6ob4m8nmva99Wzz7bCsVzHiJGAhxlnt2nUTa1jrOSxrxcPQjQA8j/8oJcLTVT0gVJZ3wp0dZtLO+OpIGZPUHSpPCo7FQM2pe1Arl1Rx9nZP3/qK+GVOfsSbr31oTpiFi4tLergw/1SFXyrqYzMyB7Ac4aRgT60orQPTR2lCRKbK31ENMSy1WExA3TXPdzGOKyUzTx89oE0+Zs4D0TLIFyxI3SSqHFhM2hErBxzcJoh1TlWr7/nfb/kaUog== Received: from [98.139.214.32] by nm12.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Mar 2016 13:42:51 -0000 Received: from [98.139.212.249] by tm15.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Mar 2016 13:42:51 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1058.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Mar 2016 13:42:51 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 887012.75315.bm@omp1058.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-YMail-OSG: scdQROYVM1kOelAv_obzekSkYY_JzjssG.V6JSJRiBKTPUlHjIl4Z5fTx5OI9xw pjb5qIYqOyX3bf7EAz9D0J4hrc63qcLcFZnnOaL7ABS_YTgI9owk2lo8XyG4HT5KIHNV7wBNKRlX 1SLvJFk8bD7lajly3P6VrhhOx_fmpnnd3ZPAhf93DyWubNFTgXV8gw2Sx346zF_NTasCcTfQte61 KItpFEMluoeR.dgbtr1gCWz616Xuyf8M0HnfC8Aonf2W2TCoDDq62Bx927Qgnaklkd09bn4MSlM4 anxqU3qyTMxtjzY.9ijNavydCNj602FRU_5ATQ1T.7w.LG_U8WStVB198uYh8g_1s_ZnBUloKSbj eoRDsB8cmOcnYO3dkYLu3Hk.nqLGZ.LDZS_SX86nQz.S6nXleVWnsPj3oO_BU7jd0CMsOxN7azF3 8gy0yTB1lgn5C0X6vZF8qUJL.YqUYH9_sFE0uJXh0r1_klPA8zGJwnQten.FQqeHCw2VglmMy39a NKXoR.kOO Received: by 76.13.26.66; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 13:42:51 +0000 Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 13:42:51 +0000 (UTC) From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=96mer_G=C3=BClmen?= Reply-To: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=96mer_G=C3=BClmen?= To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" Message-ID: <1942944243.1146982.1457962971125.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Subject: xrandr MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1942944243.1146982.1457962971125.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 13:42:59 -0000 On this page:5.4.=C2=A0Xorg Configuration | =C2=A0 | | =C2=A0 | =C2=A0 | =C2=A0 | =C2=A0 | =C2=A0 | | 5.4.=C2=A0Xorg ConfigurationRun xrandr(1) without any parameters to see a= list of video outputs and detected monitor modes: | | | | View on www.freebsd.org | Preview by Yahoo | | | | =C2=A0 | I ran this code:xrandr --mode 1280x1024 --rate 60But system out is:xrandr: = --mode must be used after --output From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Mar 14 14:37:37 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1407FAD0527 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 14:37:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFA66F99 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 14:37:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-208-111.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.208.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DB4D276DB; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:37:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id u2EEbRTL002330; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:37:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:37:27 +0100 From: Polytropon To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=D6mer_G=FClmen?= Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=D6mer_G=FClmen?= via freebsd-questions Subject: Re: xrandr Message-Id: <20160314153727.6d2a4183.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <1942944243.1146982.1457962971125.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1942944243.1146982.1457962971125.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1942944243.1146982.1457962971125.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 14:37:37 -0000 On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 13:42:51 +0000 (UTC), =D6mer G=FClmen via freebsd-quest= ions wrote: > On this page:5.4.=A0Xorg Configuration >=20 > | =A0 | > | =A0 | =A0 | =A0 | =A0 | =A0 | > | 5.4.=A0Xorg ConfigurationRun xrandr(1) without any parameters to see a = list of video outputs and detected monitor modes: | > | | > | View on www.freebsd.org | Preview by Yahoo | > | | > | =A0 | >=20 > I ran this code:xrandr --mode 1280x1024 --rate 60But system out is: > xrandr: --mode must be used after --output You didn't supply a valid value for the --mode parameter. Try this: % xrandr --fb 1280x1024 % xrandr --size 1280x1024 See "man xrandr" for details. --=20 Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Mar 14 14:40:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43D8AAD08BE for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 14:40:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sm@ara-ler.com) Received: from mail-ig0-x234.google.com (mail-ig0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17528691 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 14:40:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sm@ara-ler.com) Received: by mail-ig0-x234.google.com with SMTP id ig19so63540107igb.0 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 07:40:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ara-ler-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=WE4S4j1YHbBxojPkF/lLcSps7WdLjBR294wATY+dRmc=; b=MjG7rI3NjdOOgIn3dXsEvVssBOb/MVrJFWOwVjs8iovdP/Zlb5UITt+wxsnmZ3OCAg cu/7i2BMobq7qi31XCbqJ2+jJS1vdx2vBq5OQ7XIgurgvrZ0tA+LrxZm2129qnc4dY7g aXmUrbUEuPaMpE98b5sypfSCxfaZXwj0aZWQHwo1duDdQwXBG0FfbJkiyojJEwUt123W rA/QpE/MCuPr07Yqq9z2YhLp+bRMRATO4cpjUWlSssTP+ZrxWs+Xiab8h5OLGsJ386dD 93J+2XryACracxk5Zdj065kIvjW0ogXysOYNUIEjkq3WqcVW2h37frizBCFgvyyuCVlB TnTA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=WE4S4j1YHbBxojPkF/lLcSps7WdLjBR294wATY+dRmc=; b=Noejz46Qv4fyFaPkPGI4B4fXtxYZ9UkVrf4D9AD4KvYhjCxMV1rCCcsF9t7iDWMDj6 Y6FGv7rVdxzOiZqxfIUX0R/VAhUvv2YRUY+88A5GhaEnXi7J1ijiU9g4Bgg7sAmvPfQ0 mC1dAihGdcTW+ZHZ6+B6mT6lsgwfpJVCvaMQ5VQJTbHBdhH3l94rDYuwqJa4StBBdcPN Vcy3LpDwKaXFV/4UFuKvrMAqQsmtPbMxWGdKOXu3ydVVY/I9bepC0+CtbZiv7tqOKoma ekHSm82UN8iCqUWfM9E83e42Pv/bm66GWITG+j+/3JnJF2NlpI/oUQyGJK3lwoh5A3nD jCNg== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLNAPStXHBCTS0Jzq8eYDvJzg/uhtZ9qh+E8wMZjYl1ibWS2GHaxkCT1wImU1G9mw== X-Received: by 10.50.119.103 with SMTP id kt7mr18349598igb.49.1457966448307; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 07:40:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian.ara-ler.com ([50.243.135.133]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t2sm6733322igs.3.2016.03.14.07.40.47 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 14 Mar 2016 07:40:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 08:40:46 -0600 From: Sergey Manucharian To: twilight Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No access to Forums Message-ID: <20160314144046.GB2946@debian.ara-ler.com> References: <20160312182648.GA1429@dendrobates.araler.com> <56E6C101.6080400@openmailbox.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56E6C101.6080400@openmailbox.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 14:40:49 -0000 Excerpts from twilight's message from Mon 14-Mar-16 13:47: > Your IP address must've got on a black list. I use tor for connecting to > the Internet and I usually can't connect to forums.freebsd.org with the > same error. > > On 12.03.2016 18:26, Sergey Manucharian wrote: > > What's wrong with access to https://forums.freebsd.org/ ? > > > > Everything was fine before. Today Firefox 45.0 tells: > > > > Secure Connection Failed > > > > The connection to forums.freebsd.org was interrupted while the page was > > loading. > > > > The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because the > > authenticity of the received data could not be verified. > > Please contact the website owners to inform them of this problem. Well, I've just rebooted my modem and got a new IP. Same problem. Also I checked both current and previuous IP with http://mxtoolbox.com , it shows them clean. There were several discussions on both forums and mailng lists last year regarding Forum's security settings (SSl/TLS). However I'm using the latest Firefox (and tried Chromium as well), and assume it's supposed to have the correct SSL/TLS settings. Everything was working fine 3-4 days ago. Thanks, Sergey From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Mar 14 14:48:39 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A103AD0C70 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 14:48:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from the.lists@mgm51.com) Received: from oneyou.mcmli.com (oneyou.mcmli.com [IPv6:2607:f2f8:af30::100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "oneyou.mcmli.com", Issuer "RapidSSL SHA256 CA - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 634B2BE1 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 14:48:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from the.lists@mgm51.com) Received: from sentry.24cl.com (sentry.24cl.com [IPv6:2001:558:6017:94:a4d0:ac15:9da2:65ec]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "sentry.24cl.com", Issuer "Mike's Certificate Authority" (verified OK)) by oneyou.mcmli.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3qP0xL0st1zSn4f for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 10:48:38 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mgm51.com; s=mgm51-02; t=1457966918; bh=vkChZl/P7S/4KJK/JTVqcLinYQxiq1Gsz+KtU4J+AyQ=; h=Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Date; b=aqRlCAQu35bBpRAXx47OMsKOkp7oTtyh4AiZQW/fPTaCUxa3eFe2wzKO/jopDYziV s7TdsleMRKyxUo5WhBe5wO1hniv3QY8gtGkkq/y0GrqMzZPIqryUGffPSJrEB6YVoK xZeJiNmX1J927gMv+PjT0T8tq3on8oaLTSSSC2LK6Izeyd6Pp3T6v0LNl8cbq9EFCC 31942mjxBgAnftjdb9X6gtmrgZk5gvTcy+psw2JHwgu5mr0at9Xi72ki+9ip5aYSX2 PsgyHOCpyHPmzvSbtixtZC/ogaCKNnjxYw11CgMBT7V8yTj+UV06dBmF/k78hGd+ol rCU2GnSeMgsDQ== Received: from [IPv6:fdcf:b715:2f4d:1:a187:4872:3e74:6e7e] (unknown [IPv6:fdcf:b715:2f4d:1:a187:4872:3e74:6e7e]) by sentry.24cl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3qP0xJ6Tfsz3LN1 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 10:48:36 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: No access to Forums To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20160312182648.GA1429@dendrobates.araler.com> <56E6C101.6080400@openmailbox.org> <20160314144046.GB2946@debian.ara-ler.com> From: Mike Message-ID: <56E6CF43.4020608@mgm51.com> Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 10:48:35 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160314144046.GB2946@debian.ara-ler.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 14:48:39 -0000 On 3/14/2016 10:40 AM, Sergey Manucharian wrote: > Excerpts from twilight's message from Mon 14-Mar-16 13:47: >> Your IP address must've got on a black list. I use tor for connecting to >> the Internet and I usually can't connect to forums.freebsd.org with the >> same error. >> >> On 12.03.2016 18:26, Sergey Manucharian wrote: >>> What's wrong with access to https://forums.freebsd.org/ ? >>> >>> Everything was fine before. Today Firefox 45.0 tells: >>> >>> Secure Connection Failed >>> >>> The connection to forums.freebsd.org was interrupted while the page was >>> loading. >>> >>> The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because the >>> authenticity of the received data could not be verified. >>> Please contact the website owners to inform them of this problem. > > Well, I've just rebooted my modem and got a new IP. Same problem. > Also I checked both current and previuous IP with http://mxtoolbox.com , > it shows them clean. > > There were several discussions on both forums and mailng lists last year > regarding Forum's security settings (SSl/TLS). However I'm using the > latest Firefox (and tried Chromium as well), and assume it's supposed to > have the correct SSL/TLS settings. Everything was working fine 3-4 days > ago. ===================== When I try to access https://forums.freebsd.org I get a ~TLSA validation failed~ error. Last night I was able to access the forums, but it took two minutes or so for a page to appear. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Mar 14 14:51:56 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91FD6AD0DF8 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 14:51:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sm@ara-ler.com) Received: from mail-io0-x22c.google.com (mail-io0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C010DEC for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 14:51:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sm@ara-ler.com) Received: by mail-io0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id n190so225319167iof.0 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 07:51:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ara-ler-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=iaJcAuW9/rXOWK0qoMHFPPmPCYNaH80XzhSfN3QccTA=; b=LAhvMPW8o21DvCJQuMyTn/xSG3R8b0ZUOhAOUxFocj8a9/gqae3bKO7zZ1S+jnyEln bs3cVTr3IahlgbEU7F4Dv/peTHTHKgAVS61NqhrbBeM5Vzu1vY56S+S0lXsOZNkF3fsF c+3jwyi6eFZbMJLOiulNOWQSt6ldf5OkJ3KaxZ+R6o4sEhwfkuIjCKYfvrJgSV9jd8mM Q11dtAaEq3oTFeqc9d/bS4Kg4ZPSPy6Sq/7zt0LS2kOKTI2ZdTjalcMwI3NgQsFdEGXm iv7Q4HtWU0vPavDlh0im12Fc9zqSdWyiBK6/3NF/nnU2/YmGTp5cZ+uTVREmWwIFLCmb QOZw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=iaJcAuW9/rXOWK0qoMHFPPmPCYNaH80XzhSfN3QccTA=; b=V545LiXsNZHPWc8V4Ashp4CN90hdNI5q7RrsVcYNRhGOq9JQCSVkdH7TlDk9ozxYQH bG84AWvq/WbszIvXSi6ZKLyJOcAj4WcJBmCcuPaFbSiLHuEiFlQHjwkFmP0WG5B7Fi3J wMoD0LZokNmVOPuZrck9ycCaxrGzTu1y6nVqXXrl7oULZcW5V3i1oGUAoWJd3Y0uv/tM 8Tlw2qQDAK19INnVFPBBhmfyT4haxHLS4oP5DKzBuKAdm2ibZAPAjyAHld/5i25oUQXx zugh6XNRFrfJ+5qhOjgZEA6dF+jw0srefcpk4srZ8sgLtlxwrIuhs5pPzhkR4XPzhZIM 96nw== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIJ+MthE6uO/9Y7xAcZf/4ODc06n2G3yYTpBa8WUwlbOpLnHSsFQrH2IJMqZ8Yrhg== X-Received: by 10.107.148.9 with SMTP id w9mr27706011iod.131.1457967115692; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 07:51:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian.ara-ler.com ([50.243.135.133]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y190sm9607488iod.14.2016.03.14.07.51.54 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 14 Mar 2016 07:51:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 08:51:53 -0600 From: Sergey Manucharian To: Mike Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No access to Forums Message-ID: <20160314145153.GC2946@debian.ara-ler.com> References: <20160312182648.GA1429@dendrobates.araler.com> <56E6C101.6080400@openmailbox.org> <20160314144046.GB2946@debian.ara-ler.com> <56E6CF43.4020608@mgm51.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56E6CF43.4020608@mgm51.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 14:51:56 -0000 Excerpts from Mike's message from Mon 14-Mar-16 10:48: > On 3/14/2016 10:40 AM, Sergey Manucharian wrote: > > Excerpts from twilight's message from Mon 14-Mar-16 13:47: > >> Your IP address must've got on a black list. I use tor for connecting to > >> the Internet and I usually can't connect to forums.freebsd.org with the > >> same error. > >> > >> On 12.03.2016 18:26, Sergey Manucharian wrote: > >>> What's wrong with access to https://forums.freebsd.org/ ? > >>> > >>> Everything was fine before. Today Firefox 45.0 tells: > >>> > >>> Secure Connection Failed > >>> > >>> The connection to forums.freebsd.org was interrupted while the page was > >>> loading. > >>> > >>> The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because the > >>> authenticity of the received data could not be verified. > >>> Please contact the website owners to inform them of this problem. > > > > Well, I've just rebooted my modem and got a new IP. Same problem. > > Also I checked both current and previuous IP with http://mxtoolbox.com , > > it shows them clean. > > > > There were several discussions on both forums and mailng lists last year > > regarding Forum's security settings (SSl/TLS). However I'm using the > > latest Firefox (and tried Chromium as well), and assume it's supposed to > > have the correct SSL/TLS settings. Everything was working fine 3-4 days > > ago. > ===================== > > When I try to access https://forums.freebsd.org I get a ~TLSA validation > failed~ error. > > Last night I was able to access the forums, but it took two minutes or > so for a page to appear. That's true, it takes so long time to open the page. I still cannot access Forums from home, but from my workplace computer It takes too long. S. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Mar 14 15:01:41 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9908DACF201 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:01:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf.mardorf@rocketmail.com) Received: from nm27-vm6.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (nm27-vm6.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com [212.82.97.57]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F215F689 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:01:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf.mardorf@rocketmail.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rocketmail.com; s=s2048; t=1457967525; bh=jViC9WdwSoKnNzTjgd5vnvVpwlqtX8yAaXgSG3NQvAk=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From:Subject; b=G9ptiarj1HyM/O7ZP2JEoaKSMCGBLMBn3r4Jnud2s0FkdOrbprWb5UFq3f6kesu93XMkpJebsCun+iWSIQf0BwD9+SD5oDVBcFKFfdHJ0GDzYJoRYgd5FnyVpPh0yTr5Yx7ONn2YHUVIxaNrxbEWkNdYLqV4H5vdlXZ9y+AxEC8/Yo09lf7AlkcaGB88oZGm7lfBm8yjR/MAi+qJ+v9yDpnoqWEZm8xZq4sGZCekQyUJEhwSO5pNojAL0MN0q0ozTROSisEgFc5O7l6OOBkj+x3t7muA+YBj62jZ0xOF6pTGWdGYu73W8mDJJT9UkMKFPQxdcIX1t3nlNp7vEi/cxg== Received: from [212.82.98.53] by nm27.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Mar 2016 14:58:45 -0000 Received: from [46.228.39.91] by tm6.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Mar 2016 14:58:45 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp128.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Mar 2016 14:58:45 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 588785.3452.bm@smtp128.mail.ir2.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: B7dbGL0VM1nwGAoHgoEcktf_8RysyjJfDKChNjRv_9WiErA cVxyYzALJYdg1E1BID6YPqxhxz2OnY55pyAZPzVBH8tNo_ggY_3nsocV.0kw .Iwp7xUcZufEuYJslhrwg_GEHyXb_nLslNqrhpT94LZMDqS.D.27S2f4u4ab I3vSCmBsLLbQjQTSAUmFKQT_BB2c93ETn6AGGv6GfqD2P_gIqVx4DhAMwGYC ajiIaKL33Es0esdBRj.QFu.13ictL3qrXkt1ouWQh98BQESs2MjoCGHhB_sf X5Ys4SeLPuNahaU2_grYzA.R07w6woYxuRWQYqZOZklo16EAUVgFnrAjODEh qbqsyx0_SO0FxmCE8XBl0UNMxkfM0sZlgTvdzxBxFgP3ZSucrJz8RR2o6PGQ ez_cTjdR9ysxXHq4Ow9wQ7eck9Dwuf3bdYg7nECJ5r.NllsRm05HEfmiWmc3 40Pv8VRvjOClA9WopjzwFjtH1tdp_ahUNb92T6EvkXPnjH4tw29dY7FR5XCa Py7_QiiC30PM0twFgt0EYMsCOJ.MDhTNoFiMrH4YOcu9hHZ58P.jbJJofUHy YaVjTeepSdg-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: BeMCPs2swBABTJ3kAeEiC_hE0mz8jRexLddJfD8pI2j32fOacjBmXg-- Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:58:45 +0100 From: Ralf Mardorf To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No access to Forums Message-ID: <20160314155845.1eaa79e1@archlinux.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20160314144046.GB2946@debian.ara-ler.com> References: <20160312182648.GA1429@dendrobates.araler.com> <56E6C101.6080400@openmailbox.org> <20160314144046.GB2946@debian.ara-ler.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2-1-geb08800 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-arch-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:01:41 -0000 Same version of FF, but on Arch Linux. [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ pacman -Q firefox firefox 45.0-1 It takes very long to load https://forums.freebsd.org/, but no error message or warning appears. I repeated with IceCat. [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ pacman -Q icecat icecat 38.6.0-1 The same, it takes around 1 minute with a fast ADSL connection, but the page loaded successfully. FWIW, I did not remove all that Google crap in FF's about:config, but in Edit > Preferences > Security all that "Block reported ..." is unchecked, so perhaps all that Google safebrowsing data mining is disabled, even while I didn't remove it in about:config. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Mar 14 15:51:32 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EB9CAD07E9 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:51:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sm@ara-ler.com) Received: from mail-io0-x234.google.com (mail-io0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41427F3E for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:51:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sm@ara-ler.com) Received: by mail-io0-x234.google.com with SMTP id n190so227708239iof.0 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 08:51:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ara-ler-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=2xLRWt1vzi0i2OUD4XgL9fJ5s04vNONPhK9SONoRC5A=; b=pmsoIwnghntQGGBs84i3bnPqf9yeUiizrkRo65tjaKq6Tbb9+nT3gZqIBH5D4eIVJS h3zQpN1lC87TXY3jNmJFGM6VUcPSN7XMWWo3oFw28nb8Xw2CylFjgFi4xOqamey6lnAS Hqod6Us1X8aYyp32hG/kNN9k8lKu1BEnBPv5NH7Q0hD2PbcGhNazYxp0Fy2q8RCetuGB t3r8T4ORdnp7dO5zkGmrlQ+NvomjYDk2va0HzTC5CKG/EXDa7h+mZ2Fhc50uWBTrDuf1 b8Ja5lGSvgYm+oMKtYfP45GfVbBHE3izP9JOIa1Jz4618eO/up8uLhaon3PzEg/CUsaN /nKQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=2xLRWt1vzi0i2OUD4XgL9fJ5s04vNONPhK9SONoRC5A=; b=LZFOecWSZoSpsyUZjuE0gqbGu7ZfNSaPUPb5C3hu4QhtcjNZQiSYksfJ4BRweUSkBM tZMw/nwMKGdhXun6817TRTVzn81YzOvh/BDpM+M7RBUEdFHXKDfPECwsVIG4ae5TGKh9 7fe8IfkV9pK6fcpWSJigNH0/+Im6s4E9R2pX9CUtByAlQcf2svjM9NgE7MSM3BgZ6K0S S95Li1fb5d0XRadrLVMZJZwCM95IU0ZejnwYbvh4VBzFXmapW1cnjh1Vl/dXcqNNPa0H M+czOYiXvJbMMjw1tFOR3f3aLUXPDW3sIIgL9eHhPsdGTIB/KX+csD0tEMiZ2NqmF/tP ECgQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKhheVQSyhGVOe1m+1bC0kA3mxx47lNkuYeCwev+F4xUhv/al84HjQBWw3a9vDMGQ== X-Received: by 10.107.10.150 with SMTP id 22mr23116728iok.85.1457970691426; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 08:51:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian.ara-ler.com ([50.243.135.133]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id vf11sm6845216igb.20.2016.03.14.08.51.30 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 14 Mar 2016 08:51:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:51:29 -0600 From: Sergey Manucharian To: Ralf Mardorf Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No access to Forums Message-ID: <20160314155129.GD2946@debian.ara-ler.com> References: <20160312182648.GA1429@dendrobates.araler.com> <56E6C101.6080400@openmailbox.org> <20160314144046.GB2946@debian.ara-ler.com> <20160314155845.1eaa79e1@archlinux.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20160314155845.1eaa79e1@archlinux.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:51:32 -0000 Excerpts from Ralf Mardorf via freebsd-questions's message from Mon 14-Mar-16 15:58: > Same version of FF, but on Arch Linux. > > [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ pacman -Q firefox > firefox 45.0-1 > > It takes very long to load https://forums.freebsd.org/, but no error > message or warning appears. Here is a reply from Forums [0] «This has nothing to do with you. It's an issue on the forum's side. Volunteers are on it as we speak and will be fixed after work. Or after lunch.» S. [0] https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/55488/ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Mar 14 16:15:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73D30AD0367 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:15:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pipfstarrd@openmailbox.org) Received: from smtp12.openmailbox.org (smtp12.openmailbox.org [62.4.1.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37E911FF8 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:15:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pipfstarrd@openmailbox.org) Received: by mail2.openmailbox.org (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 8E0D52ACB67B; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 14:47:17 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=openmailbox.org; s=openmailbox; t=1457963237; bh=OVU6kQuxIUkeWGjFxRUS2y/3+cypY2qTG6THO0zywBo=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=gn27YvqfP+Ouq/CrsZt6JzgJBHRG4wayj4ghINitZbho8MiTO0JRsNYI4fr3bljFy UqqXaqZlUqEc7PC+LYjQiVPOZGgZSs4hB2MBQ0XK8MPUpVSBHsjt/2eSZbL2LVQ5hc p7jEh5ueC8xghY7VPWPFgR81pV059DXTy2tBR8U0= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on openmailbox-b2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,NO_RECEIVED,NO_RELAYS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Subject: Re: No access to Forums DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=openmailbox.org; s=openmailbox; t=1457963237; bh=OVU6kQuxIUkeWGjFxRUS2y/3+cypY2qTG6THO0zywBo=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=gn27YvqfP+Ouq/CrsZt6JzgJBHRG4wayj4ghINitZbho8MiTO0JRsNYI4fr3bljFy UqqXaqZlUqEc7PC+LYjQiVPOZGgZSs4hB2MBQ0XK8MPUpVSBHsjt/2eSZbL2LVQ5hc p7jEh5ueC8xghY7VPWPFgR81pV059DXTy2tBR8U0= To: Sergey Manucharian References: <20160312182648.GA1429@dendrobates.araler.com> From: twilight Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <56E6C101.6080400@openmailbox.org> Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 13:47:45 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160312182648.GA1429@dendrobates.araler.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:15:19 -0000 Your IP address must've got on a black list. I use tor for connecting to the Internet and I usually can't connect to forums.freebsd.org with the same error. On 12.03.2016 18:26, Sergey Manucharian wrote: > What's wrong with access to https://forums.freebsd.org/ ? > > Everything was fine before. Today Firefox 45.0 tells: > > Secure Connection Failed > > The connection to forums.freebsd.org was interrupted while the page was > loading. > > The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because the > authenticity of the received data could not be verified. > Please contact the website owners to inform them of this problem. > > Thanks, > Sergey > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Cheers~ PGP key fingerprint: 07B3 2177 3E27 BF41 DC65 CC95 BDA8 88F1 E9F9 CEEF You can retrieve my public key at pgp.mit.edu. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Mar 14 16:52:17 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08BC8AD0260 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:52:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x22c.google.com (mail-wm0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A801D1A5 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:52:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id p65so111059803wmp.0 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:52:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=YtiAHLeIhG5e4SMW/BR2Mkv32YTtPGB2XMg5Fd1ojeA=; b=T15vTAOLZdBMg/U5sRTmrv5zDJ5794v8BtaHXAOI75FnMuBZQ33j1lIzneDut7hYlV XZWUsoJeuujZBx1Sa9MNLQY5rGBWuOUy7/bLfnHS3F76yFaPVgr9oFPIWyLmAjmoEyH7 r+9ssHO9M95DXkPsvug+R7LK7FGLNfdVahQn3d6BYtBEWXJQXxncnIritWb9kZQYxBNq SvCzsFMXe4/8NQLEQinu99WxFYffjxorzg8bgPbLcdarO4gZEzJ1+d0FSYbFCG4PYDRu 53GZvJs17vz9GbBMz8YeDDkPe41gMj1qbDboLgrSH+xKAAPROtTOuZgI6Pgpb+286tou mZhA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YtiAHLeIhG5e4SMW/BR2Mkv32YTtPGB2XMg5Fd1ojeA=; b=SLGS0ljbsVtqkXb1IAfDlf4xvgriuxBdNx/e0FMOvQfcKFEkQ/ESZCJCRSMsoq3wlH dg1Iaj1oSvN1nRxQ8HP9JjBvOVZevlJvFF6rVJZpt+CUv9jeHl2WhALMApoo7UxWUTuf QUxhw7uOmyVa1RI7qReFDx/Irjw9uK3KqwcIH3NmGHIiczJb+C1StQygvYjNhm098ZE7 JdJaW4Z8fsCUqNKd2AZ4TYfaSznPdknmHiBJcwEWyHm6xlcAzwPAsbnKsL5Utu0RfLGP k+gRnyYgNwb891R51Q87scV+1wAGxb8PtveT0icxdBBCIwSgz5TmKYaTCXDu5H+k1kF3 7H6w== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJL6LfJ6xXhmRTNnXmYTHllpzg7rKFWV5Np9guZFGXCbOv2Ua6ealODDbcHX/I5Q5Q== X-Received: by 10.194.63.144 with SMTP id g16mr29645463wjs.149.1457974334574; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:52:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com ([90.195.211.158]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e4sm16999442wma.10.2016.03.14.09.52.13 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:52:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:52:12 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WARNING: $xyz is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). Message-ID: <20160314165212.18eb9c61@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20160313232411.J61428@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20160313232411.J61428@sola.nimnet.asn.au> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.2) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:52:17 -0000 On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 00:47:57 +1100 (EST) Ian Smith wrote: > Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 614, Issue 8, Message: 3 > On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 17:22:39 +1100 andrew clarke > wrote: > > > I notice on FreeBSD 10.2-REL (also 10.3-RC2), executing: > > > > service -e > > > > results in the following appended to /var/log/messages: > > > > Mar 13 17:09:57 blizzard ozzmosis: /usr/sbin/service: WARNING: > > $growfs_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). > > Indeed. Just to check for a regression, I ran the same on stable/9 > (October). Most of these are enabled in /etc/defaults/rc.conf, and > everything specifically enabled in rc.conf is there: (*) I'm not sure what you are saying here, but what I'm seeing is that the warnings are about scripts that don't have a default enable setting in either rc.conf or defaults/rc.conf. What seems to be happening is that service doesn't actually load the scripts, it runs load_rc_config 'XXX' (XXX being a dummy value) which pulls in rc.conf and defaults/rc.conf. It then greps for rcvar and name in the scripts without actually sourcing them. That means it can't pick-up any defaults defined in those scripts, including the *_enable defaults set in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/* The error from growfs (in /etc/rc.d) is because it doesn't have an entry in defaults/rc.conf From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Mar 14 17:37:30 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6C1ACF535 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 17:37:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shahzaib.cb@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ig0-x22c.google.com (mail-ig0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 862EB1BB1 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 17:37:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shahzaib.cb@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ig0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id av4so67812120igc.1 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 10:37:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=yEQPsabJK4S7AfqfCENDR6RXOojBIMejHb+aQRzufHM=; b=QQN/fh564zMhQfWeyaFKEFKZ6OyWjAdtRTc3WV6FoMsl9LRJMCgGo2l9YfPOGckCW9 sYvRwDbScfux0fYFAn2JSHCPF09DSPch7Sau5vuNFTowgdeK7kcbI7+IkW44YlvRiUdP vY3q2U79BKYmqbm3V8c9qJxZ/u2jghYNE+/YrnemsOowV1tgCsOIzxSXSeVdbJMKvy6t 40q20Z3rg3Bml03wcOVphR7Rl986ZQX6zVK71F/Cp6BNV2LjMwI39PHDd2GcJhuzQLrN uRa32Zs1fXfaw01Cz24oSz61Ccm2wE/1U0xT7BT2m0ZGLDag5g/2xWDCriP4Cfa7IlEI nzoQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=yEQPsabJK4S7AfqfCENDR6RXOojBIMejHb+aQRzufHM=; b=CdTL8izYL0d3n+oC0oxrZtM98DAOiZ+kbGV4Vbi6adGKfb05iw5yXvRHut6b1OfvD6 FnPXPUgexiJUdoL6wdKbwPMYhWtI9GRe/QVlVY6F+DP+FC3dLMtTHNWCwlIXHL723dpI IfdSuiNwlRZ4LvhCGt0QEEWrK9g5nYH6btiQrf5uo0E0ast1ZyjoOeGNL70FLrOXqSmR 0Hv30iDOzkgglfUIvmsfcoYIGl04/f8yRCV8FexKTXfy/7B+stuZrHq9iphN9cYFHZ3y bhVM2Bp1ShjyVoyMiPxJiLGZAyV2DKB48NAWdm5CqWo8Q+nqV/Z337p5k3tKmCDQ1BRB LQJg== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJI+zXaxNHrdE7wzWON1TUVF7oOTllvJ1HoE4MyyvlusyF7k18RN5b+a46FQLb9W56r3Jg1KZnuvBcNfyw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.132.42 with SMTP id or10mr19197108igb.85.1457977049654; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 10:37:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.79.128.145 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 10:37:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <56E2F586.9000108@gmx.de> References: <56E2E9AC.1040902@gmx.de> <33444.128.135.52.6.1457712900.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> <56E2F586.9000108@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 22:37:29 +0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD Crashes Intermittently !! From: shahzaib shahzaib To: "lokadamus@gmx.de" Cc: galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 17:37:30 -0000 Hi, Well, we've some messages in kernel logs each time the server boots up which are : (probe0:mps0:0:3:7): CAM status: CCB request completed with an error (probe0:mps0:0:3:7): Retrying command (probe0:mps0:0:3:7): INQUIRY. CDB: 12 e0 00 00 24 00 (probe0:mps0:0:3:7): CAM status: CCB request completed with an error (probe0:mps0:0:3:7): Retrying command (probe0:mps0:0:3:7): INQUIRY. CDB: 12 e0 00 00 24 00 (probe0:mps0:0:3:7): CAM status: CCB request completed with an error In following post it is written that : these are due to a mismatch between firmware and driver version . FreeBSD 9 = ships with driver version 16 and FreeBSD 10 includes version 19. Linux currently has version 18. So make sure that in step 11, you always flash the version that matches your operating system=E2=80=99s driver version, don=E2=80=99t = blindly go with version P20 or the latest version Here is the link to that Post : http://blog.michael.kuron-germany.de/2014/11/crossflashing-dell-perc-h200-t= o-lsi-9211-8i/comment-page-1/ =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D It looks like that it might be the issue of crash as we're using LSI-9211 controller and maybe due to mismatch between firmware and driver version this crash occurs. On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 9:42 PM, lokadamus@gmx.de wrote: > On 03/11/16 17:15, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > >>> http://pastebin.com/042SJ11c > >> Have you look for bios update? > >> http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/QPI/5500/X8DT3.cfm > >> Version R 2.1 is the last one. > > > > In my humble opinion, the _need_ to install BIOS update is extremely ba= d > > flag on hardware manufacturer reputation. For ages I used Tyan system > > boards ("motherboard" jargon became the name for system board decades > > ago...) > Ok, never use DELL. You will never be happy with it. > I work some month for a big company and most server problems can only be > solved with a bios update. > > And never look for microcode updates, that will fix things and problems. > Greetings > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Mar 14 19:17:58 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13D1FAD1BD4 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 19:17:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) Received: from BLU004-OMC4S1.hotmail.com (blu004-omc4s1.hotmail.com [65.55.111.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEDD7F2C for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 19:17:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) Received: from BLU436-SMTP73 ([65.55.111.135]) by BLU004-OMC4S1.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Mon, 14 Mar 2016 12:17:51 -0700 X-TMN: [yVQ1fZIZptN8g5z28+DGYwc0BlTkRMvK] X-Originating-Email: [carmel_ny@outlook.com] Message-ID: X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at scorpio.seibercom.net Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:17:45 -0400 From: Carmel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Getting wireless network up and running Organization: Seibercom NET X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.28; i686-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Mar 2016 19:17:50.0528 (UTC) FILETIME=[33515400:01D17E26] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 19:17:58 -0000 I cannot seem to get my wireless network up and running. /boot/loader.conf if_bwn_load="YES" # Broadcom BCM43xx IEEE 802.11 wireless NICs /etc/rc.conf ## Wireless wlans_bwn="wlan0" ifconfig_wlan0="WPA SYNCDHCP" /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf network={ ssid="Wireless-2g" psk="Secret" key_mgmt=WPA-PSK } I have run "service netif restart", but the network never comes up. I tried rebooting, but still nothing. If I append a "0" to bwn; ie, wlans_bwn0="wlan0", I get this output: dhclient[1485]: short write: wanted 20 go 0 bytes dhclient[1485]: exiting The system is then frozen solid, so I am forced to reboot into single user mode and remove the entry in "rc.conf". Can anyone tell me what the problem is? Thanks! -- Carmel From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Mar 14 19:22:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8942BAD1F01 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 19:22:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from laszlo.danielisz@yahoo.com) Received: from nm10-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm10-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.213.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51BD86A9 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 19:22:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from laszlo.danielisz@yahoo.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1457983332; bh=EMnQ1CPLZk4KFhiIrlbwa5jxY7qEMWdQJWVpFHsp3UY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:References:From:Subject; b=hu+RmAHQHO54btZoI7m1dKQyKSKOoP73OyTx2HbxF3JDSh2lcakQhexTGA1m8Q8QYVNShJnripvYygGaDDDT8mgQdODsdkwOJi/VB3baAhsK/Ai5h+iMdOLZsnjvuR6aC/DHtAhKyJLolRpZN5NJE1MNhVyPwDCvwsiZoVIKfKCxeAnjwWl/q3zcuXjh5YJocrrQvS7Ed9n/xs9xHMRbhXpJi+X84GIZhIazxXOgHiLrtpJfO3okX4E6bhIJTHcdPDGn8y7rCdb8U01lN7ne52ASc4WSLzTvVp2+zOL9aORv1wNcekSX5f9noiZKN2n/sjFJapSUEcOd6lKlJcz6Mg== Received: from [98.139.215.141] by nm10.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Mar 2016 19:22:12 -0000 Received: from [98.139.215.250] by tm12.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Mar 2016 19:22:12 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1063.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Mar 2016 19:22:12 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 400576.23018.bm@omp1063.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-YMail-OSG: Egin9XsVM1m5s6eLD.TUWFWzwiT5MFYxAzKgIk2VxeM_1ZADXK6OKN0yudLKfN9 7whB5q_i78ujhZt1Zkpw3S6n4kx.5M8LSvw0FyUOZ2XNA3wgIPgTRvJK2NRnlFDUu.oHBBUFK8QS g46.26yx7wJyCGwpF1ChIsTAN5GqcWFZlu6bmsbuuLf7jgLHcCgbd71N_dXS010Ix7v9stSmEMZP RlCZxiyOrGtWEQN9AO4KNu_Q1Z4WJ93sZaBv8Tm3lYyAWuCb5AqRZlHWKNkG1f3y4SNKe47whGGF Hc0VPtpawp1lNWLYHTx6O.7ywzd1z8w_Nnh.8oK9__GsaRXbLGiQrOkQEp5eqO5SD97WWSUkLZR_ WgtCCR1xbqr9oBsKED5XIr4mEFdFVjQPNR69Tb9zQ7J2yivqxZtbRcu5gFN119_xtV_.MVbHCRzv pGJwgOUH.VPo6jWMMegxsIZfH4K.iP0m4_yy9NtQsfCgoy4Xvdq483oLbohZzQd7VTEdKNzx_Bo7 ttNZBkrSz1MIayMXG6_GkjRboH1R_O1p2OtPYDA-- Received: by 76.13.27.133; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 19:22:11 +0000 Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 19:22:11 +0000 (UTC) From: Reply-To: To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <189494617.1433339.1457983331645.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Subject: ezjail-admin update issues MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <189494617.1433339.1457983331645.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 19:22:19 -0000 Hi All, I am trying to update my jails and I'm getting an error. Try to figure out = what's happening but haven't found yet.=C2=A0Do you have any idea? Installing updates...rm: /usr/jails/newjail//boot/kernel.old/.freebsd-updat= e: Read-only file systemrm: /usr/jails/newjail//boot/kernel.old: Read-only = file systemtouch: /usr/jails/newjail//boot/kernel.old/.freebsd-update: Read= -only file systemCould not create kernel backup directory And here is the whole log:# ezjail-admin update -usrc component not install= ed, skippedLooking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found.Fetchin= g metadata signature for 10.2-RELEASE from update5.freebsd.org... done.Fetc= hing metadata index... done.Inspecting system... done.Preparing to download= files... done. No updates needed to update system to 10.2-RELEASE-p13.No updates are avail= able to install.Run '/usr/sbin/freebsd-update fetch' first.src component no= t installed, skippedLooking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors foun= d.Fetching metadata signature for 10.2-RELEASE from update4.freebsd.org... = done.Fetching metadata index... done.Inspecting system... done.Preparing to= download files... done. The following files will be updated as part of updating to 10.2-RELEASE-p13= :/etc/snmpd.config/var/db/etcupdate/current/etc/snmpd.config/var/db/etcupda= te/log/var/db/mergemaster.mtreeInstalling updates...rm: /usr/jails/newjail/= /boot/kernel.old/.freebsd-update: Read-only file systemrm: /usr/jails/newja= il//boot/kernel.old: Read-only file systemtouch: /usr/jails/newjail//boot/k= ernel.old/.freebsd-update: Read-only file systemCould not create kernel bac= kup directory Thanks!Laci From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Mar 14 22:50:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E77E3AD1EB7 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 22:50:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x22c.google.com (mail-wm0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 936491CD for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 22:50:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id l68so121572228wml.0 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:50:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=3ODAw6l8jNmxOZlxecqDWSTvjaBG8T6Leo/r+KcPvNo=; b=zWvNLYOQ7iT5497R67s18ACsxv71Juymae/z3kkwQ4Az+OcIJOi/E72sHEahgM4YjD K1WIWKT9/KPeZemvX2o2yE9ON0SVTIIYeBjKm9zoQiWCVe5PWeaBypzHnjg4bMvC2EFJ z1o9aHlifjStqfA4ZHi+Fj5LlR0N4BF8ICNEK3xyywwMkpa60J0GtKEOSxT1qwT8QMWp YkJ688U1jegX9iaj8IUAOU/nXisc0gnmzNGH1wpz/JtPy+5RsoFt287kGBS265FbPfni v5XX5TveBXliJpk6mI2lIApYx+vlkJbXAySWHNeHdUR0CRMb+6akTl98eBY4BvSdmDNu hWiw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=3ODAw6l8jNmxOZlxecqDWSTvjaBG8T6Leo/r+KcPvNo=; b=Hp6gJsGa4e0Of+r9BKs3YMOVbmzq9CAT7Fj1Zb5CJ9WyZfRJE7Ua9A+q6PfLzEZQwP dbF72j8lMzGwsAnaXeFp9kep7ciR/xWGiNlIqZ/xDn2IYeEene9NzWV6xGJF9TsDx/kH DTQy4uPdsv+lWAFSOKNZD95bs+lpxOEdJfsVbOuT9C2WDNN9u9XIZ4l57TeeCZmRar+C /eJ9cb01tu93fvS0M5ZDA2RQt0R+yFrrB9Eh96vcxvIK3UUop1J/mNianAeQE264ctse ZPRF9CC+k2w3BQW1IcjKTPK5cI1NFNdo14z1ORdeRlWknn0hqPxHtfkFyrqSa/n0mA/V iNAQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIg3sWIWQCPQf5CdH5dImgqQs1BT0uvPiozDd5dRh+/kGMG4gyTw6wag4VxL4F1M2K8m4GvzUlc8VvUzQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.28.134.137 with SMTP id i131mr21386482wmd.62.1457995833153; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:50:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.23.104 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:50:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 23:50:33 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Getting wireless network up and running From: Ben Woods To: Carmel Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 22:50:35 -0000 On 14 March 2016 at 20:17, Carmel wrote: > I cannot seem to get my wireless network up and running. > > /boot/loader.conf > if_bwn_load="YES" # Broadcom BCM43xx IEEE 802.11 wireless NICs > > /etc/rc.conf > ## Wireless > wlans_bwn="wlan0" > ifconfig_wlan0="WPA SYNCDHCP" > > /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf > network={ > ssid="Wireless-2g" > psk="Secret" > key_mgmt=WPA-PSK > } > > I have run "service netif restart", but the network never comes up. I > tried rebooting, but still nothing. > > If I append a "0" to bwn; ie, wlans_bwn0="wlan0", I get this output: > > dhclient[1485]: short write: wanted 20 go 0 bytes > dhclient[1485]: exiting > > The system is then frozen solid, so I am forced to reboot into single > user mode and remove the entry in "rc.conf". > > Can anyone tell me what the problem is? > > Thanks! > > -- > Carmel Hi Carmel, To help us determine which model of WiFi card you have, can you please reply to the list with the output of "pciconf -lv". By the way, your rc.conf line should be: wlans_bwn0="wlan0" Refer to the FreeBSD handbook for more details: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-wireless.html Refer to the bwn(4) man page for details about the bwn drive and which models it supports: https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?bwn Regards, Ben -- From: Benjamin Woods woodsb02@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Mar 15 00:31:13 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F702AD19D5 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:31:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul.stuffins@ravexdata.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f180.google.com (mail-lb0-f180.google.com [209.85.217.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD31E372 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:31:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul.stuffins@ravexdata.com) Received: by mail-lb0-f180.google.com with SMTP id bc4so1807437lbc.2 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 17:31:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=YkVXNGwTVP36RhPI8dZWAT+yDGbRvHiUwsE0fRCehbI=; b=F4qdmta32mBsm4Kjx/e2gpmgMzvQ+/xdpOADYL0D7rLCqZ2yi5SLb0B5on1VCQsVsa 5nj90kjMSxYGk6XvR+87Sn2Z5F6/VRmSKAl4VDgwTXGD8mt3lw2NEjPcmBfohbuGYBf8 HyvjpuDFjFJG8ZD1xUV7rrLfSIvIMMDFC+tTN20paKVuZ87oXdC1JwFXRCufzZvqsXQY XOQiFM0PvqVBhfjQJMwEzoUeZ3DVuhO7SZqls8rFbFojq5mG4IajaYx/ndRvqwSatEuY EAWW79a95TqcH3SmeBZB9mmgXvMCqY//91Ic3DCBDSpF2Ys2sHbgfku2mNBNrjRBiRQ0 JdJA== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLDqgjpOLdMh5/MOyYxzq9FR2Xv1teyXH60RzkoAFJ1exT3uqUJ/lIQBJ6paUs3WGGwDTzPT/scDUx6GMWm MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.25.35.87 with SMTP id j84mr8189492lfj.119.1457968231837; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 08:10:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.75.33 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 08:10:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [212.69.56.43] Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:10:31 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: MySQL backend for PowerDNS From: Paul Stuffins To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:31:13 -0000 Hi Guys, I am wanting to install PowerDNS on FreeBSD with the MySQL backend, I do not particularly want to compile from the ports tree, yet it looks like the gmysql backend is not compiled by default. Is there an easy way that I can install the gmysql backend using pkg, or would I need to compile and install using the ports tree? Many Thanks Paul From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Mar 15 00:46:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2650AD1F83 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:46:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jim@ohlste.in) Received: from mail-qg0-x236.google.com (mail-qg0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7E19DF1 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:46:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jim@ohlste.in) Received: by mail-qg0-x236.google.com with SMTP id t4so1772087qge.0 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 17:46:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ohlste-in.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=MV+t5QDrHlResQPS2u7Mjey6JllKjsAM8PUAw43Poek=; b=Sm3G1Em1cUEs95HhNpXPIM6twU/xTU/exiyLTkhCJMJxhGokeNUx/YDf5dBDzt0KUI 5zisL1yZb8pvLkGK1FPfYf1WxCBSGep8OEMyq29D4+qiiwDxIFjeAYUrQ8awdPaX8yv/ zRhRdgTR/qSNL0AHgmUjZyXzlPbUbM1vzqJEWqz0U1nWSIYTBxtqoVfRLeStk8sDUPZk Vw1OY2SINFRFnl5OQjFpN6VuKbAMg9Am6rgN8YjoazxJvY+zekKDIG5x5zdu6OYWmC1j ZReop1vvHFo0RAKWPUksoOdGswOUxCNhMa2N6XDsUhbU9iGDFvUs9zQqptt9tOjGiMc1 0WCw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=MV+t5QDrHlResQPS2u7Mjey6JllKjsAM8PUAw43Poek=; b=X/I7Ho57lpzp8CbVSJKcv+To9lVjb2dFt2KkqxEh0jdiU+e0aaYssS22A5AZ2erc5D CxqHJAU8hsbEz09Gtx2tM9ozha6PuMgUY3bMC9csBlWGa9tgHJC9mIk7FqD1S3X+sjPQ /thCByTFW8DXOk8UPVrcxgPdDjvzzE+6WBTT9CW5LLmDdxN4C4rT47D8KpzJQ36ET6WG 27Jrc3Z/6eOKeNVBIfEJpn6CoWSs/3NNKm84Yy4J46o09qNYCWVlaN23tUK4BBgxlLCM hpICyEOOe1Bcx+3mRlVBO2t/aWy7/PZng221uNHL+K/kPPHnfjCkuzJVcz+OMHTxA2Pn kBLQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJK3xUJq8C6A9/8CPaSUKTvUQrN+1BliHqEvBPWI3X2U/3VJCTly1D1RR0X5Ek9ycQ== X-Received: by 10.140.227.137 with SMTP id x131mr34710530qhb.7.1458002792507; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 17:46:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.13] (pool-96-249-243-37.nrflva.fios.verizon.net. [96.249.243.37]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 49sm11543291qgx.32.2016.03.14.17.46.31 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 14 Mar 2016 17:46:32 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: MySQL backend for PowerDNS From: Jim Ohlstein X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13D20) In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 20:46:30 -0400 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: To: Paul Stuffins X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:46:35 -0000 Hello, Jim Ohlstein > On Mar 14, 2016, at 11:10 AM, Paul Stuffins wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > I am wanting to install PowerDNS on FreeBSD with the MySQL backend, I do > not particularly want to compile from the ports tree, yet it looks like the > gmysql backend is not compiled by default. > > Is there an easy way that I can install the gmysql backend using pkg, or > would I need to compile and install using the ports tree? > # pkg install mysql56-server That'll pull in the client as well. -- Jim From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Mar 15 00:58:46 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFA05AD044D for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:58:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D5B912C3 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:58:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u2F0wcxe001672 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 14 Mar 2016 18:58:38 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id u2F0nveZ036490; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 18:50:27 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 18:49:57 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?=D6mer_G=FClmen?= cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: xrandr In-Reply-To: <1942944243.1146982.1457962971125.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: References: <1942944243.1146982.1457962971125.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1942944243.1146982.1457962971125.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 14 Mar 2016 18:58:38 -0600 (MDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:58:46 -0000 On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Ă–mer GĂĽlmen via freebsd-questions wrote: > I ran this code:xrandr --mode 1280x1024 --rate 60But system out is:xrandr: --mode must be used after --output Does the video card have more than one output? Most do, and it's reasonable that xrandr wants to know which output should be set to that mode. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Mar 15 07:00:28 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87719AD045F for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:00:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from buhara13@yahoo.com) Received: from nm28.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm28.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.212.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DA4CA9 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:00:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from buhara13@yahoo.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1458025221; bh=Kihsvg+kflULNJe5r8ZUL7lZpkfto3qzLP0XUBzJ6O4=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=MmC19aMGNoft8Y+t8TOax2N8rOCBtn+1Cio5oa3G3sZ5PMNB5QENK2SQi6Jspg/u5NcwHhHoS3hKMF013cwhvwQXmmwzvkcCLFcfYRpVxYWqfLBwfuhFu6aAzaFMNjWqtiDuTX9WHmeVzi7GG9tPGVwzaMU0aas5IXn/41CGetaFHtyGI9Wz5ih8hjIA5VSLE+JWx1DoLWzBv6e6ms1bTqegBJHb0SwHJTyTbMjE1TdGsF4SDAEXFERkbUyn+c1ugMV7qbGpR9ZCW5S7TuTNY92M+8QB62RlTTykOtG7M5ImEgF9x86wbmghm2Cfb9bmq0SXdOl+AJNf3txCsgVWyg== Received: from [66.196.81.173] by nm28.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Mar 2016 07:00:21 -0000 Received: from [98.139.212.210] by tm19.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Mar 2016 07:00:21 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1019.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Mar 2016 07:00:21 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 91907.7641.bm@omp1019.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-YMail-OSG: qN_xpM4VM1lL2yNbVauK8X1KWKvCjRp3.8ru__ZSsW4jGmGJF6qbdLt40XQvbdq 8d3HpMzYqItJIYKna2F8bdc.xKyGUA35JYv.gEwUQYQ8uec.Cjyl3Curv6GnKf5lbOn7G9ayR.JU ux_5xsOG.2EmoNDr4Los7lOAObWqMJfSbTrXr9pYDTeSK5NWCRbIdLw5u6NXMEW6pVBvbHNM.gl2 zFgRnadOaAd_COS_d8oY3mfTYwMLSt46zuq0ctkgMhnN5pMxpSUnZNv1uZqYKCp3ssuAJ8DqELs4 ji3P6qZta53Q8dYDQjiQGMdw8c4JBzAY2ebvqTZseKJmqa5O0nj0dkMf84_MlkQ.cmX7ly6Foz.K sDIX4BuY7Dddjbvq8wIlk2iP8tgMvhK9_zMwmuR_AoWGC4_MPdv0VjkGHytJMUQghwHx.gGhLyP_ Dia4_3ZUluc1QQKMwjSFLochWdKhDB60ssWHBw33B5V.saHBuXH5cn_X.MqzTVBK8t4WbyS_rIOy 9jzTydk1S Received: by 66.196.81.109; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:00:20 +0000 Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:00:20 +0000 (UTC) From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=96mer_G=C3=BClmen?= Reply-To: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=96mer_G=C3=BClmen?= To: Warren Block Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" Message-ID: <1684597747.97183.1458025220379.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1942944243.1146982.1457962971125.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1942944243.1146982.1457962971125.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: xrandr MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:00:28 -0000 Graphics card has only one output by the way. I informed you because of to = help to improve the document anyway.For your information...=20 On Tuesday, March 15, 2016 2:49 AM, Warren Block w= rote: =20 On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, =C3=96mer G=C3=BClmen via freebsd-questions wrote: > I ran this code:xrandr --mode 1280x1024 --rate 60But system out is:xrandr= : --mode must be used after --output Does the video card have more than one output?=C2=A0 Most do, and it's=20 reasonable that xrandr wants to know which output should be set to that=20 mode. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Mar 15 09:55:53 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8823CAD0ADA for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 09:55:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nazari.s11@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x22b.google.com (mail-wm0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3771DD5 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 09:55:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nazari.s11@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id p65so136313697wmp.1 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 02:55:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=WrAOH9zEALKfBG4krYGqQH9Pt3dSYAAy5MXtN9mIcok=; b=eIo19u0rAyb20/iQOfZHS8Wu6lsLv+3+nurOggrZWNRIaRCX+38yjnmB/KOhR17SxB ZgztbmTnthUiXE6+nlnGCHKRj0oFa0LpbojunTMybngXHpYyoy3CfcunyiIzgwexsrAi OH8iPqKceAcu6FoahbWChYUN+SakE2f1fIRckTDJlccOUyxyY/VkqvQc2HpoVNyVKNax 4tTTaaYBf6H5mgwaJ3QGslPsF3nL8kxzx/C8AE0E3B8LKUaUz3acP+MnsM/NdVYqrKCs eAihLwDQTGXvgQZFUGY6cdfVSzHonsYfLd818htjB+UJCcWUtMfNQPJrarTckhILvIDD Jq3A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=WrAOH9zEALKfBG4krYGqQH9Pt3dSYAAy5MXtN9mIcok=; b=HyE8S1EOT+enAg7g1TY13SoIPpi5iQfinw7WLefyyIev6D8vnh3IMqVf/jxD8/tn9u +nN3eE2Kliq05ZTTZzifqUc+ZSyd5QM1bluDuVXJUW85DuJJGZng/PCsLQXIxCt5Qyx7 /ZZjaKIh7b2FIgL+f7R8YCKmt39+ibKFr6wlI+rJ0MHArtcM9LMPbFT0cjEa40DLkfrC Y9O4jLzCWop+UD/eKBViBEvaSZbeXKsC8Pbo31GhgPTWjIiw4f0tAdD8tRdZvui4163B 4vNfinjx5S4PyF8CvfSMyWXZ4mCt8ufUh6AGPObYL10wX2/jdIrknj4FC+rau06hgAMl t0mA== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIYxn3k+rfJNR+AifZTN+IK172GMAT1k08yoLv/wSx+JMu24kaQNrulKYlFt8C1DiFhhpjRdfmqfq8QTQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.28.126.131 with SMTP id z125mr23993684wmc.77.1458035751718; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 02:55:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.28.21.73 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 02:55:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:25:51 +0330 Message-ID: Subject: implementation of RSVP in FreeBSD From: Samira Nazari To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 09:55:53 -0000 hi, I want to implemente RSVP daemon in FreeBSD 9.2 . I find rsvpd that implementated in FreeBSD3.4 in below links : ftp://ftp.isi.edu/rsvp/release/rsvpd.rel4.2a4-1.tar.gz http://www-x.antd.nist.gov/nistswitch/dist/nistswitch-0.2a.tar.gz Freebsd 3.4 is too old and we had a lot of changes in Freebsd 9.2 . We have to use a lot of cost to transfer it to the current version of our operating system (freebsd 9.2). Are there newer version of rsvp daemon that usable in freebsd 9.2 ? regards, SamiraMiss From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Mar 15 10:18:42 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44DBEAD14AB for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 10:18:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F600D3F for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 10:18:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-32-133.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.32.133]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D01033CED3; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:18:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id u2FAIVoO003140; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:18:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:18:31 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Samira Nazari Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: implementation of RSVP in FreeBSD Message-Id: <20160315111831.c2ba030f.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 10:18:42 -0000 On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:25:51 +0330, Samira Nazari wrote: > hi, > I want to implemente RSVP daemon in FreeBSD 9.2 . > I find rsvpd that implementated in FreeBSD3.4 in below links : > > ftp://ftp.isi.edu/rsvp/release/rsvpd.rel4.2a4-1.tar.gz > http://www-x.antd.nist.gov/nistswitch/dist/nistswitch-0.2a.tar.gz > > Freebsd 3.4 is too old and we had a lot of changes in Freebsd 9.2 . > We have to use a lot of cost to transfer it to the current version of our > operating system (freebsd 9.2). Sorry, FreeBSD 9.2 is not the current version of FreeBSD. In fact, it's not supported anymore. FreeBSD 9.3 is the legacy release. The current production releases are FreeBSD 10.1 and 10.2. That should be a better target for porting rsvpd to. > Are there newer version of rsvp daemon that usable in freebsd 9.2 ? As FreeBSD 9.2 isn't really supported anymore, I assume there won't be any resources supplied for such a port. So if you want to implement a RSVP daemon based upon the sources mentioned above, create a port for FreeBSD 10 (and the new ports infra- structure which appeared during FreeBSD 9 development and is now standard for FreeBSD 10 and 11). Current OS sources and ports collection don't seem to contain the RSVP daemon. Probably it has been "officially discontinued". However, there's no reason someone couldn't start to create a new implementation and provide it to the ports tree. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Mar 15 10:35:21 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFADDAD1DF8 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 10:35:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nazari.s11@gmail.com) Received: from mbob.nabble.com (mbob.nabble.com [162.253.133.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0FB19FA for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 10:35:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nazari.s11@gmail.com) Received: from msam.nabble.com (unknown [162.253.133.85]) by mbob.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D119722F8F93 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 03:25:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 03:35:19 -0700 (MST) From: samira To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1458038119723-6084931.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <20160315111831.c2ba030f.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20160315111831.c2ba030f.freebsd@edvax.de> Subject: Re: implementation of RSVP in FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 10:35:21 -0000 Polytropon wrote > On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:25:51 +0330, Samira Nazari wrote: >> hi, >> I want to implemente RSVP daemon in FreeBSD 9.2 . >> I find rsvpd that implementated in FreeBSD3.4 in below links : >> >> ftp://ftp.isi.edu/rsvp/release/rsvpd.rel4.2a4-1.tar.gz >> http://www-x.antd.nist.gov/nistswitch/dist/nistswitch-0.2a.tar.gz >> >> Freebsd 3.4 is too old and we had a lot of changes in Freebsd 9.2 . >> We have to use a lot of cost to transfer it to the current version of our >> operating system (freebsd 9.2). > > Sorry, FreeBSD 9.2 is not the current version of FreeBSD. In fact, > it's not supported anymore. FreeBSD 9.3 is the legacy release. > The current production releases are FreeBSD 10.1 and 10.2. > That should be a better target for porting rsvpd to. you are right ,i'm wrote wrong my means of "current version" is "my current using version". Polytropon wrote >> Are there newer version of rsvp daemon that usable in freebsd 9.2 ? > > As FreeBSD 9.2 isn't really supported anymore, I assume there > won't be any resources supplied for such a port. So if you want > to implement a RSVP daemon based upon the sources mentioned > above, create a port for FreeBSD 10 (and the new ports infra- > structure which appeared during FreeBSD 9 development and is > now standard for FreeBSD 10 and 11). > > Current OS sources and ports collection don't seem to contain > the RSVP daemon. Probably it has been "officially discontinued". > However, there's no reason someone couldn't start to create a new > implementation and provide it to the ports tree. > > > > -- > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@ > mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@ > " If I can find somebody who is starting to implement it so good :-) -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/implementation-of-RSVP-in-FreeBSD-tp6084924p6084931.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Mar 15 11:06:28 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4A99ACFB52 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:06:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) Received: from BLU004-OMC4S24.hotmail.com (blu004-omc4s24.hotmail.com [65.55.111.163]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69B3A102E for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:06:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) Received: from BLU436-SMTP177 ([65.55.111.135]) by BLU004-OMC4S24.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Tue, 15 Mar 2016 04:05:20 -0700 X-TMN: [vFvwvcc3UNGgrVOEoHT+FfOOHMDKyVZp] X-Originating-Email: [carmel_ny@outlook.com] Message-ID: X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at scorpio.seibercom.net Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:05:13 -0400 From: Carmel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Getting wireless network up and running In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Seibercom NET X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.28; i686-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Mar 2016 11:05:20.0576 (UTC) FILETIME=[90963C00:01D17EAA] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:06:28 -0000 On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 23:50:33 +0100, Ben Woods stated: > On 14 March 2016 at 20:17, Carmel wrote: > > > I cannot seem to get my wireless network up and running. > > > > /boot/loader.conf > > if_bwn_load="YES" # Broadcom BCM43xx IEEE 802.11 wireless NICs > > > > /etc/rc.conf > > ## Wireless > > wlans_bwn="wlan0" > > ifconfig_wlan0="WPA SYNCDHCP" > > > > /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf > > network={ > > ssid="Wireless-2g" > > psk="Secret" > > key_mgmt=WPA-PSK > > } > > > > I have run "service netif restart", but the network never comes up. > > I tried rebooting, but still nothing. > > > > If I append a "0" to bwn; ie, wlans_bwn0="wlan0", I get this output: > > > > dhclient[1485]: short write: wanted 20 go 0 bytes > > dhclient[1485]: exiting > > > > The system is then frozen solid, so I am forced to reboot into > > single user mode and remove the entry in "rc.conf". > > > > Can anyone tell me what the problem is? > > > > Thanks! > > > > -- > > Carmel > > > Hi Carmel, > > To help us determine which model of WiFi card you have, can you please > reply to the list with the output of "pciconf -lv". > > By the way, your rc.conf line should be: > wlans_bwn0="wlan0" > > Refer to the FreeBSD handbook for more details: > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-wireless.html > > Refer to the bwn(4) man page for details about the bwn drive and which > models it supports: > https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?bwn I think that this is what you want: siba_bwn0@pci0:2:1:0: class=0x028000 card=0x100f1043 chip=0x431814e4 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation' device = 'BCM4318 [AirForce One 54g] 802.11g Wireless LAN Controller' class = network -- Carmel From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Mar 15 11:08:42 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDC1DACFD2A for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:08:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F20D1277 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:08:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u2FB8e9j039591 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 15 Mar 2016 05:08:40 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id u2FB8eZX039588; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 05:08:40 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 05:08:40 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?=D6mer_G=FClmen?= cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: xrandr In-Reply-To: <1684597747.97183.1458025220379.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: References: <1942944243.1146982.1457962971125.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1942944243.1146982.1457962971125.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <1684597747.97183.1458025220379.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 15 Mar 2016 05:08:40 -0600 (MDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:08:42 -0000 On Tue, 15 Mar 2016, Ă–mer GĂĽlmen wrote: > On Tuesday, March 15, 2016 2:49 AM, Warren Block wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Ă–mer GĂĽlmen via freebsd-questions wrote: > > > > I ran this code:xrandr --mode 1280x1024 --rate 60But system out is:xrandr: --mode must be used after --output > > > Does the video card have more than one output?  Most do, and it's > > reasonable that xrandr wants to know which output should be set to > > that mode. > Graphics card has only one output by the way. I informed you because of to help to improve the document anyway. > For your information... Understood, and I did not mean to sound like we did not appreciate the information. What I meant was that xrandr might not be written to understand that when there is only one output, it should not be necessary to specify an output. Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Mar 15 11:38:57 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21E6DAD0BBB for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:38:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) Received: from BLU004-OMC4S22.hotmail.com (blu004-omc4s22.hotmail.com [65.55.111.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E49887B1 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:38:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) Received: from BLU436-SMTP12 ([65.55.111.135]) by BLU004-OMC4S22.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Tue, 15 Mar 2016 04:37:49 -0700 X-TMN: [gQsDb1wk0OHshKfpljxgJ2hS9tGsz9Ef] X-Originating-Email: [carmel_ny@outlook.com] Message-ID: X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at scorpio.seibercom.net Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:37:43 -0400 From: Carmel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Getting wireless network up and running In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Seibercom NET X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.28; i686-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Mar 2016 11:37:49.0424 (UTC) FILETIME=[1A30D700:01D17EAF] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:38:57 -0000 On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:05:13 -0400, Carmel stated: > On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 23:50:33 +0100, Ben Woods stated: > > > On 14 March 2016 at 20:17, Carmel wrote: > > > > > I cannot seem to get my wireless network up and running. > > > > > > /boot/loader.conf > > > if_bwn_load="YES" # Broadcom BCM43xx IEEE 802.11 wireless NICs > > > > > > /etc/rc.conf > > > ## Wireless > > > wlans_bwn="wlan0" > > > ifconfig_wlan0="WPA SYNCDHCP" > > > > > > /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf > > > network={ > > > ssid="Wireless-2g" > > > psk="Secret" > > > key_mgmt=WPA-PSK > > > } > > > > > > I have run "service netif restart", but the network never comes > > > up. I tried rebooting, but still nothing. > > > > > > If I append a "0" to bwn; ie, wlans_bwn0="wlan0", I get this > > > output: > > > > > > dhclient[1485]: short write: wanted 20 go 0 bytes > > > dhclient[1485]: exiting > > > > > > The system is then frozen solid, so I am forced to reboot into > > > single user mode and remove the entry in "rc.conf". > > > > > > Can anyone tell me what the problem is? > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > -- > > > Carmel > > > > > > Hi Carmel, > > > > To help us determine which model of WiFi card you have, can you > > please reply to the list with the output of "pciconf -lv". > > > > By the way, your rc.conf line should be: > > wlans_bwn0="wlan0" > > > > Refer to the FreeBSD handbook for more details: > > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-wireless.html > > > > Refer to the bwn(4) man page for details about the bwn drive and > > which models it supports: > > https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?bwn > > I think that this is what you want: > > siba_bwn0@pci0:2:1:0: class=0x028000 card=0x100f1043 > chip=0x431814e4 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation' > device = 'BCM4318 [AirForce One 54g] 802.11g Wireless LAN > Controller' class = network > Okay, I made another change. I got this from the boot-up messages: Mar 14 15:16:44 scorpio1 kernel: siba_bwn0: mem 0xfdefe000-0xfdefffff irq 16 at device 1.0 on pci2 Mar 14 15:16:44 scorpio1 kernel: bwn0 on siba_bwn0 Mar 14 15:16:44 scorpio1 kernel: bwn0: WLAN (chipid 0x4318 rev 9) PHY (analog 3 type 2 rev 7) RADIO (manuf 0x17f ver 0x2050 rev 8) Mar 14 15:16:44 scorpio1 kernel: bwn0: DMA (32 bits) So, I made the following changes to the rc.conf file: ## Wireless siba_bwn0="wlan0" ifconfig_wlan0="WPA SYNCDHCP" Now the system does not hang, but it doesn't bring up the wireless network either. This is the output from "service netif restart" Stopping dhclient. Stopping Network: lo0 em0. lo0: flags=8048 metric 0 mtu 16384 options=600003 nd6 options=21 groups: lo em0: flags=8c02 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=4219b ether 00:1a:a0:89:ca:e4 nd6 options=21 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active Starting Network: lo0 em0. lo0: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 options=600003 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 nd6 options=21 groups: lo em0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=4219b ether 00:1a:a0:89:ca:e4 inet6 fe80::21a:a0ff:fe89:cae4%em0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet6 2606:a000:b7c2:1700:21a:a0ff:fe89:cae4 prefixlen 64 autoconf inet 192.168.0.9 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 nd6 options=23 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active -- Carmel From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Mar 15 15:30:11 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B72B4AD1B6B for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 15:30:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from afiskon@devzen.ru) Received: from relay16.nicmail.ru (relay16.nicmail.ru [195.208.5.134]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 661E61D73 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 15:30:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from afiskon@devzen.ru) Received: from [109.70.25.118] (port=43876 helo=nicmail.ru) by f17.mail.nic.ru with esmtp (Exim 5.55) (envelope-from ) id 1afqYT-000NnU-6J; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:06:42 +0300 Received: from [10.0.6.222] (account afiskon@devzen.ru HELO fujitsu) by fcgp07.nicmail.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.3) with ESMTPA id 260673465; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:06:41 +0300 Received: from [93.174.131.138] (account afiskon@devzen.ru HELO fujitsu) by proxy02.mail.nic.ru (Exim 5.55) with id 1afqYT-0006iB-Qx; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:06:41 +0300 Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:06:26 +0300 From: Aleksander Alekseev To: Carmel Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Getting wireless network up and running Message-ID: <20160315180626.24ebe79f@fujitsu> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 15:30:11 -0000 Hello, Carmel Indeed wireless network configuration could be tricky in FreeBSD, been there. Here are a few hints that may help (not only in your but in general case). 0. Use stable FreeBSD version, e.g. not CURRENT 1. Make sure your hardware is supported by FreeBSD: https://www.freebsd.org/relnotes/CURRENT/hardware/support.html If not consider buying USB wireless adapter which is supported by FreeBSD. I personally use TP-LINK TL-WN725N. Edimax EW-7811Un also looks good. 2. Make sure corresponding driver is successfully loaded, see `dmesg`, `man kldload`. 3. Read https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-wireless.html carefully. Here is very least you have to do: sudo ifconfig wlan0 create wlandev (device name here) sudo ifconfig wlan0 up scan /etc/rc.conf: ``` wlans_(device name here)="wlan0" ifconfig_wlan0="WPA DHCP" ``` /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf: ``` network = { ssid="tp-link" psk="ololotrololo" } ``` sudo service netif restart netstat -nr 4. Also consider using wifimgr - GUI tool for configuring Wi-Fi: sudo pkg install wifimgr Good luck! -- Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev http://eax.me/ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Mar 15 17:00:27 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98A47AD2697 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:00:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gfh@swampdog.co.uk) Received: from mx1.solardns.com (mx1.solardns.com [109.73.127.119]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DF131330 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:00:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gfh@swampdog.co.uk) Received: from titan.solardns.com ([213.129.84.167]) by mx1.solardns.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1afrth-0002MF-I0 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 16:32:44 +0000 Received: from [81.109.74.232] (port=37225 helo=sd.swampdog) by titan.solardns.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.86_1) (envelope-from ) id 1afrth-001Iar-7A for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 16:32:41 +0000 From: Guy Harrison To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: dhcpd, iscsi and a raspberry pi Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 16:32:13 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201603151632.14124.gfh@swampdog.co.uk> X-AuthUser: swampdog X-Filter-ID: s0sct1PQhAABKnZB5plbIY0Wf8WMyPuXHU+XUfPiEwcD4Rd/h6nhaQ7ZruH71MWktHFHLxtsn9wx dKyKAPnphQR4+0K7G1KvSa5ZSxPOujd2vxpKI0nPnfcNMKzMVl0ZgZ/Tw6DoY/8c2+5B5/2kISDH pDYvAGz9SvCxHRSxuIbb9htmGaMvX8zqHZbv/ZiK92Y/11kvH4JBsRjPkhf9EC3breeaRmS0N1SH eKK+UkYtlPa/1nUwnw/hoHgr71b/vCrJPmnnTHzVkpybMK7ZTSEhnb66958pLGInGdL26Gs7lfzu /tPONwh9XNOtDyHaCxAmFTLzJB9zUoZ7ZW57niXMjKy9q3SRj7Q2gxGEk++TEtSxjwHNYb/2LiS7 Aj0AWhTXYlwXE+/uHic0AZ4kmrFUBlt3lbnvUeKEYqy8QDYdQk7XGXTfKeB6w9EPnG9cwaEh4MHC ziS+7iGBWJgglPOW6bvL9DC431WlF1LxckxUtEzMQ8hG9MbEN0FihoziP1MA7ED7gs165rpid68f E6luiuQKW35wYye6nyYrkIlIr+mi9pmJxFJZniBtPSj46J1fhOzjF0b4LXcjJZ5lojV3tFdAoO2u Gco+Sc/igH4lkBSh9vJu6q0AAzXqBj9opKSnwxkGqROms5EUtztdTJjbPrNfgmP1oCYIL5fOtJM= X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@mx1.solardns.com X-Filter-Fingerprint: IFrWXGses7OKB5S5G8/dJdIz5bb8V0ykx8BnFBnunHBA3cTUQ1R++keuE7RDJ8Kg3RbMLUalw1oC mj99/u+Poh38tEMU4IgC4sNz49qn3HHnhRv/ZJ3kEy8bfiAr+Fb/UpndEJ0YoaLytXXo8BMTaVt0 ARHRi6XGuAluI1udprGClI6bm+u9ssQgM5AHe3Zacv4uJct5wtJvPpZ2dlBHCwDSxr3Vz+LJ/RhM 2JZ0ECN5dnq47RWft7iCyM9+PbHelB4qP9S6mTzNwoPraFy6ieiDqMHb2a0eZvGOvr7RaxKWGCKO us9nABr0Pk/4CplP X-Originating-IP: 213.129.84.167 X-SpamExperts-Domain: out.solardns.com X-SpamExperts-Username: 213.129.84.167 Authentication-Results: solardns.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=213.129.84.167@out.solardns.com X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Class: ham X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.00) X-Recommended-Action: accept X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:00:27 -0000 HI Folks, I just wanted to check I'm getting correct behaviour 'cos I'm no expert on these things! I've built an iscsi enabled kernel for the raspberry pi (aka debian jessie) and the initrd is obtaining a first IP address then when the kernel proper boots a second IP address is obtained. Both are bound to eth0. [admin@sdvmf64dns ~/etc]$ dhcpd --version isc-dhcpd-V3.1.2p1 [admin@sdvmf64dns ~]$ uname -a FreeBSD sdvmf64dns.swampdog 8.2-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p4 #1: Thu Oct 27 14:26:36 BST 2011 root@sdvmf64dns.swampdog:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 The problem is the second IP address is "known" in that 'nslookup' knows the pi name and so forth.. lease 192.168.1.45 { starts 4 2016/03/10 14:55:05; ends 4 2016/03/10 15:05:05; cltt 4 2016/03/10 14:55:05; binding state active; next binding state free; hardware ethernet b8:27:eb:0f:32:64; uid "\001\270'\353\0172d"; set ddns-rev-name = "45.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa"; set ddns-txt = "318788caec8944734a9e0c2fe418c9db6f"; set ddns-fwd-name = "pi05.swampdog"; client-hostname "pi05"; } ..whereas the first IP.. lease 192.168.1.53 { starts 3 2016/03/09 14:09:27; ends 3 2016/03/09 14:19:27; tstp 3 2016/03/09 14:19:27; cltt 3 2016/03/09 14:09:27; binding state free; hardware ethernet b8:27:eb:0f:32:64; } ..only appears the once, on boot. This is the IP address by which the iscsi target knows the pi and it expires! I was expecting the first *.53 IP to be inherited by the kernel rather than it go obtain the second *.45 IP address. Is correct? If so, what do I need to be doing to get that to happen? I've googled this to death and not encountered this precise problem. TIA Guy From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Mar 15 17:27:12 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD064AD07B9 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:27:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amuskindu@yourispnamehere.com) Received: from GPMTA04.1dial.com (gpmta04.1dial.com [64.136.173.165]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B60EC1C4E for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:27:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amuskindu@yourispnamehere.com) Received: from gpmail-dev.1dial.com (gpmail-dev.1dial.com [64.136.173.54]) by GPMTA04.1dial.com (GPMTA04.1dial.com) with ESMTP id 3B0863E81B5; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 08:40:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by gpmail-dev.1dial.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 598CA3D79FB; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 08:40:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from gpmail-dev.1dial.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gpmail-dev.1dial.com [127.0.0.1]) (maiad, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14583-01; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 08:40:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.13.181] (unknown [64.136.164.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: amuskindu@yourispnamehere.com) by gpmail-dev.1dial.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0173B3D79F3; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 08:40:36 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: MySQL backend for PowerDNS To: Jim Ohlstein , Paul Stuffins References: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Steve Korbett Message-ID: <56E802C4.7030707@yourispnamehere.com> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 08:40:36 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: 1Dial Mailguard 1.0.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:27:13 -0000 Jim - That would just install the mysql client, right? I didn't think that'd change the compiled options on ports which can use mysql. In my experience, I have to compile mysql support into PowerDNS. If you have to do this across many installs or feel more comfortable using pkg, you can set up poudriere to create a local repository which compiles PowerDNS with the mysql backend enabled. I used this tutorial to make mine, and it works fine. http://www.bsdnow.tv/tutorials/poudriere -Steve On 3/14/2016 8:46 PM, Jim Ohlstein wrote: > Hello, > > > > Jim Ohlstein >> On Mar 14, 2016, at 11:10 AM, Paul Stuffins wrote: >> >> Hi Guys, >> >> I am wanting to install PowerDNS on FreeBSD with the MySQL backend, I do >> not particularly want to compile from the ports tree, yet it looks like the >> gmysql backend is not compiled by default. >> >> Is there an easy way that I can install the gmysql backend using pkg, or >> would I need to compile and install using the ports tree? >> > # pkg install mysql56-server > > That'll pull in the client as well. > -- > Jim > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Mar 15 17:32:36 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 631A0AD0B73 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:32:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from lb1-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net (lb1-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net [194.109.24.22]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "*.xs4all.nl", Issuer "GlobalSign Domain Validation CA - SHA256 - G2" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01FF211A5 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:32:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.erewhon.home ([83.162.243.5]) by smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net with ESMTP id WHXN1s00W07iGuj01HXPa8; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:31:23 +0100 Received: from rsmith (uid 1001) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) id 12434 by slackbox.erewhon.home (DragonFly Mail Agent v0.11); Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:31:22 +0100 Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:31:22 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: Carmel Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Getting wireless network up and running Message-ID: <20160315173122.GB92613@slackbox.erewhon.home> Mail-Followup-To: Carmel , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/NkBOFFp2J2Af1nK" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:32:36 -0000 --/NkBOFFp2J2Af1nK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 07:37:43AM -0400, Carmel wrote: > On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:05:13 -0400, Carmel stated: >=20 > > On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 23:50:33 +0100, Ben Woods stated: > >=20 > > > On 14 March 2016 at 20:17, Carmel wrote: > > > =20 > > > > I cannot seem to get my wireless network up and running. > > > > > > > > /boot/loader.conf > > > > if_bwn_load=3D"YES" # Broadcom BCM43xx IEEE 802.11 wireless NICs You also need to load the firmware using the ports/net/bwn-firmware-kmod po= rt *before* calling ifconfig. See the manual page bwn(4). (Type =E2=80=98man 4= bwn=E2=80=99 in a terminal or on the console to view the manual page.) > > > > /etc/rc.conf > > > > ## Wireless > > > > wlans_bwn=3D"wlan0" > > > > ifconfig_wlan0=3D"WPA SYNCDHCP" > > > > > > > > /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf > > > > network=3D{ > > > > ssid=3D"Wireless-2g" > > > > psk=3D"Secret" > > > > key_mgmt=3DWPA-PSK > > > > } > > > > > > > > I have run "service netif restart", but the network never comes > > > > up. I tried rebooting, but still nothing. > > > > > > > > If I append a "0" to bwn; ie, wlans_bwn0=3D"wlan0", I get this > > > > output: > > > > > > > > dhclient[1485]: short write: wanted 20 go 0 bytes > > > > dhclient[1485]: exiting > > > > > > > > The system is then frozen solid, so I am forced to reboot into > > > > single user mode and remove the entry in "rc.conf". Nevertheless, it *should* be: wlans_bwn0=3D"wlan0", because =E2=80=98bwn0= =E2=80=99 is the interface name. Try ifconfig_wlan0=3D"WPA DHCP" > > > > Can anyone tell me what the problem is? At a guess I think you forgot to load the firmware. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://rsmith.home.xs4all.nl/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 5753 3324 1661 B0FE 8D93 FCED 40F6 D5DC A38A 33E0 (keyID: A38A33E0) --/NkBOFFp2J2Af1nK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAABCAAGBQJW6EbqAAoJEED21dyjijPgg8wP/jiChQv4Il5l0fcIThc4LDMy Tj5NqhoiwBROdKupZacvzHw0KqPbqwP7x3ejiUW90/NtVOhbb2bd5GW57idtDcTi z2zXZB4KmcadAP284+np4sgEO+7JR2zJGI+OMpUD8vDKq4sIREjfu6hEM5qcrI2D FCtQ6RVrALaoB3rl0VgZbc2qBdW6sDt+lzwxhUxS0h9u+rPiIOdo+zOjCeA3K5M2 Gv2miWovFEeX+O5TM6Yph9kyeRxozxSBs+72QnWvobk+rn/1RXXz/H4Dhq7AMip9 wT8R4OWpWxN0K2dVsqxxVws2Ja5a2O2QxRab3EVLyr/XrYnnPqzPNqALARwhgyLE o5S/6igJ6nIq266uiWdzWnyo8yFnKPU8+CYFyXUCh6XVD0/y5W9BLbfRjPajOYck ck23PitATwL75QKjBGBfgsB02EuspGFPzzg73wYsOLD0Y1qnLcJ6fcY0Q8tFmitL fE1pu8pJyNzEXhpuJDAWZ2ijKsh5f0PsuB+hOnah/jeWAfAKfQASNBEMC716jMVv 1OL2O9bSLnX2Wmrm4iDFT9sBYemzVbMv0dH/VT/V5s/FrW4KZcqzvT9akzIveXUq cwUVmVsnNbW2Tp269NvF1BVvigiAIqb9WCVSfLCHktahdfnH/8z/8P0u3Y/68E0i NxKqb0xjye4ghNe3ZXqA =z9PB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/NkBOFFp2J2Af1nK-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Mar 15 17:52:59 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E8BAAD166B for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:52:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from bede.qeng-ho.org (bede.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org", Issuer "fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D5551319 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:52:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from arthur.home.qeng-ho.org (arthur.home.qeng-ho.org [172.23.1.2]) by bede.home.qeng-ho.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u2FHqZtq044868; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:52:35 GMT (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Subject: Re: dhcpd, iscsi and a raspberry pi To: Guy Harrison , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <201603151632.14124.gfh@swampdog.co.uk> From: Arthur Chance Message-ID: <56E84BE3.7010009@qeng-ho.org> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:52:35 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201603151632.14124.gfh@swampdog.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:52:59 -0000 On 15/03/2016 16:32, Guy Harrison wrote: > > HI Folks, > > I just wanted to check I'm getting correct behaviour 'cos I'm no expert on > these things! > > I've built an iscsi enabled kernel for the raspberry pi (aka debian jessie) You're asking about Debian, a Linux distro, on a FreeBSD mailing list. Not quite as bad as asking about Windows on a Mac OS list, but you'd be much better off find a Debian mailing list to ask on. Try looking here https://www.debian.org/MailingLists/ > and the initrd is obtaining a first IP address then when the kernel proper > boots a second IP address is obtained. Both are bound to eth0. > > [admin@sdvmf64dns ~/etc]$ dhcpd --version > isc-dhcpd-V3.1.2p1 > > [admin@sdvmf64dns ~]$ uname -a > FreeBSD sdvmf64dns.swampdog 8.2-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p4 #1: Thu > Oct 27 14:26:36 BST 2011 > root@sdvmf64dns.swampdog:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > The problem is the second IP address is "known" in that 'nslookup' knows the > pi name and so forth.. > > lease 192.168.1.45 { > starts 4 2016/03/10 14:55:05; > ends 4 2016/03/10 15:05:05; > cltt 4 2016/03/10 14:55:05; > binding state active; > next binding state free; > hardware ethernet b8:27:eb:0f:32:64; > uid "\001\270'\353\0172d"; > set ddns-rev-name = "45.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa"; > set ddns-txt = "318788caec8944734a9e0c2fe418c9db6f"; > set ddns-fwd-name = "pi05.swampdog"; > client-hostname "pi05"; > } > > ..whereas the first IP.. > > lease 192.168.1.53 { > starts 3 2016/03/09 14:09:27; > ends 3 2016/03/09 14:19:27; > tstp 3 2016/03/09 14:19:27; > cltt 3 2016/03/09 14:09:27; > binding state free; > hardware ethernet b8:27:eb:0f:32:64; > } > > ..only appears the once, on boot. This is the IP address by which the iscsi > target knows the pi and it expires! > > I was expecting the first *.53 IP to be inherited by the kernel rather than > it go obtain the second *.45 IP address. Is correct? > > If so, what do I need to be doing to get that to happen? > > I've googled this to death and not encountered this precise problem. > > TIA > Guy > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Moore's Law of Mad Science: Every eighteen months, the minimum IQ necessary to destroy the world drops by one point. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Mar 15 17:55:55 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B719AD181A for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:55:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from bede.qeng-ho.org (bede.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org", Issuer "fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9ACA01871 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:55:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from arthur.home.qeng-ho.org (arthur.home.qeng-ho.org [172.23.1.2]) by bede.home.qeng-ho.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u2FHtqao044899; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:55:52 GMT (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Subject: Re: dhcpd, iscsi and a raspberry pi To: Guy Harrison , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <201603151632.14124.gfh@swampdog.co.uk> <56E84BE3.7010009@qeng-ho.org> From: Arthur Chance Message-ID: <56E84CA8.4080603@qeng-ho.org> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:55:52 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56E84BE3.7010009@qeng-ho.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:55:55 -0000 On 15/03/2016 17:52, Arthur Chance wrote: > On 15/03/2016 16:32, Guy Harrison wrote: >> >> HI Folks, >> >> I just wanted to check I'm getting correct behaviour 'cos I'm no expert on >> these things! >> >> I've built an iscsi enabled kernel for the raspberry pi (aka debian jessie) > > You're asking about Debian, a Linux distro, on a FreeBSD mailing list. > Not quite as bad as asking about Windows on a Mac OS list, but you'd be > much better off find a Debian mailing list to ask on. Try looking here > > https://www.debian.org/MailingLists/ Ack, shouldn't be so hasty, just spotted your uname -a below. That 8.2 is way out of date though. I'll let someone better versed in dhcpd handle the rest. >> and the initrd is obtaining a first IP address then when the kernel proper >> boots a second IP address is obtained. Both are bound to eth0. >> >> [admin@sdvmf64dns ~/etc]$ dhcpd --version >> isc-dhcpd-V3.1.2p1 >> >> [admin@sdvmf64dns ~]$ uname -a >> FreeBSD sdvmf64dns.swampdog 8.2-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p4 #1: Thu >> Oct 27 14:26:36 BST 2011 >> root@sdvmf64dns.swampdog:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 >> >> The problem is the second IP address is "known" in that 'nslookup' knows the >> pi name and so forth.. >> >> lease 192.168.1.45 { >> starts 4 2016/03/10 14:55:05; >> ends 4 2016/03/10 15:05:05; >> cltt 4 2016/03/10 14:55:05; >> binding state active; >> next binding state free; >> hardware ethernet b8:27:eb:0f:32:64; >> uid "\001\270'\353\0172d"; >> set ddns-rev-name = "45.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa"; >> set ddns-txt = "318788caec8944734a9e0c2fe418c9db6f"; >> set ddns-fwd-name = "pi05.swampdog"; >> client-hostname "pi05"; >> } >> >> ..whereas the first IP.. >> >> lease 192.168.1.53 { >> starts 3 2016/03/09 14:09:27; >> ends 3 2016/03/09 14:19:27; >> tstp 3 2016/03/09 14:19:27; >> cltt 3 2016/03/09 14:09:27; >> binding state free; >> hardware ethernet b8:27:eb:0f:32:64; >> } >> >> ..only appears the once, on boot. This is the IP address by which the iscsi >> target knows the pi and it expires! >> >> I was expecting the first *.53 IP to be inherited by the kernel rather than >> it go obtain the second *.45 IP address. Is correct? >> >> If so, what do I need to be doing to get that to happen? >> >> I've googled this to death and not encountered this precise problem. >> >> TIA >> Guy >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > -- Moore's Law of Mad Science: Every eighteen months, the minimum IQ necessary to destroy the world drops by one point. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Mar 15 17:59:46 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90747AD19CA for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:59:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) Received: from BLU004-OMC4S28.hotmail.com (blu004-omc4s28.hotmail.com [65.55.111.167]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DEA41A6B for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:59:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) Received: from BLU436-SMTP173 ([65.55.111.137]) by BLU004-OMC4S28.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Tue, 15 Mar 2016 10:59:39 -0700 X-TMN: [x/BW6BCyidU8avNJ8QHfh4fNrEFFDuBQ] X-Originating-Email: [carmel_ny@outlook.com] Message-ID: X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at scorpio.seibercom.net Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:59:32 -0400 From: Carmel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Getting wireless network up and running In-Reply-To: <20160315173122.GB92613@slackbox.erewhon.home> References: <20160315173122.GB92613@slackbox.erewhon.home> Organization: Seibercom NET X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.28; i686-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Mar 2016 17:59:38.0564 (UTC) FILETIME=[711A3040:01D17EE4] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:59:46 -0000 On Tue=2C 15 Mar 2016 18:31:22 +0100=2C Roland Smith stated: > On Tue=2C Mar 15=2C 2016 at 07:37:43AM -0400=2C Carmel wrote: > > On Tue=2C 15 Mar 2016 07:05:13 -0400=2C Carmel stated: > > =20 > > > On Mon=2C 14 Mar 2016 23:50:33 +0100=2C Ben Woods stated: > > > =20 > > > > On 14 March 2016 at 20:17=2C Carmel wrote: > > > > =20 > > > > > I cannot seem to get my wireless network up and running. > > > > > > > > > > /boot/loader.conf > > > > > if_bwn_load=3D"YES" # Broadcom BCM43xx IEEE 802.11 wireless > > > > > NICs =20 >=20 > You also need to load the firmware using the > ports/net/bwn-firmware-kmod port *before* calling ifconfig. See the > manual page bwn(4). (Type =E2=80=98man 4 bwn=E2=80=99 in a terminal or on= the console > to view the manual page.) I did that originally. > > > > > /etc/rc.conf > > > > > ## Wireless > > > > > wlans_bwn=3D"wlan0" > > > > > ifconfig_wlan0=3D"WPA SYNCDHCP" > > > > > > > > > > /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf > > > > > network=3D{ > > > > > ssid=3D"Wireless-2g" > > > > > psk=3D"Secret" > > > > > key_mgmt=3DWPA-PSK > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > I have run "service netif restart"=2C but the network never > > > > > comes up. I tried rebooting=2C but still nothing. > > > > > > > > > > If I append a "0" to bwn=3B ie=2C wlans_bwn0=3D"wlan0"=2C I get t= his > > > > > output: > > > > > > > > > > dhclient[1485]: short write: wanted 20 go 0 bytes > > > > > dhclient[1485]: exiting > > > > > > > > > > The system is then frozen solid=2C so I am forced to reboot into > > > > > single user mode and remove the entry in "rc.conf". =20 >=20 > Nevertheless=2C it *should* be: wlans_bwn0=3D"wlan0"=2C because =E2=80=98= bwn0=E2=80=99 is > the interface name. >=20 > Try ifconfig_wlan0=3D"WPA DHCP" >=20 > > > > > Can anyone tell me what the problem is? =20 >=20 > At a guess I think you forgot to load the firmware. >=20 > Roland --=20 Carmel From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Mar 15 19:55:14 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C296DAD213E for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 19:55:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@thehowies.com) Received: from remote.thehowies.com (remote.thehowies.com [50.197.91.218]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "remote.thehowies.com", Issuer "RapidSSL CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 936BB1410 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 19:55:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@thehowies.com) Received: from PRIMARY.thehowies.local ([fe80::497b:de8e:1045:4c2a]) by PRIMARY.thehowies.local ([fe80::497b:de8e:1045:4c2a%24]) with mapi id 14.03.0266.001; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:46:27 -0700 From: John Howie To: Arthur Chance , Guy Harrison , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: dhcpd, iscsi and a raspberry pi Thread-Topic: dhcpd, iscsi and a raspberry pi Thread-Index: AQHRftv8Zhuefo6O90+tLDlPmh4RSZ9bPoqAgAAA6gD//6uqgA== Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 19:46:26 +0000 Message-ID: <4D586A3A-9972-427D-B32D-90806B0C0AB7@thehowies.com> References: <201603151632.14124.gfh@swampdog.co.uk> <56E84BE3.7010009@qeng-ho.org> <56E84CA8.4080603@qeng-ho.org> In-Reply-To: <56E84CA8.4080603@qeng-ho.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/0.0.0.160212 x-originating-ip: [192.168.1.131] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <327D63BA68959B4CA170D87FBF2F7A05@thehowies.local> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 19:55:14 -0000 SGkgR3V5LA0KDQpXaGVuIHRoZSBSYXNwYmVycnkgUGkgYm9vdHMgaXQgd2lsbCB1c2UgREhDUCBz ZXZlcmFsIHRpbWVzLiBUaGUgZmlyc3QgaXMgaW4gVUJPT1QsIGFuZCB0d2ljZSB3aGVuIHRoZSBr ZXJuZWwgYm9vdHMgKGJhc2VkIG9uIG15IG93biBvYnNlcnZhdGlvbnMsIGFuZCBjb25maWd1cmF0 aW9uKS4gVXNpbmcgV2luZG93cyBTZXJ2ZXIgREhDUCBTZXJ2ZXIsIEkgd2FzIGFibGUgdG8gdXNl IHRoZSBNQUMgYWRkcmVzcyB0byBndWFyYW50ZWUgdGhhdCB0aGUgUGkgZ290IHRoZSBzYW1lIElQ IGFkZHJlc3MgZWFjaCB0aW1lLiBZb3VyIG1pbGVhZ2Ugd2l0aCBJU0MtREhDUEQgbWF5IHZhcnku IEkgYW0gbm8gZXhwZXJ0IHdpdGggdGhhdCBESENQIHNlcnZlciBzbyBjYW4gb2ZmZXIgbm8gYWR2 aWNlIG9uIGhvdyB0byBtYWtlIGl0IHdvcmsgaW4gYSBzaW1pbGFyIGZhc2hpb24gdG8gV2luZG93 cyBTZXJ2ZXIuDQoNClJlZ2FyZHMsDQoNCkpvaG4NCg0KDQoNCg0KDQpPbiAzLzE1LzE2LCAxMDo1 NSBBTSwgIm93bmVyLWZyZWVic2QtcXVlc3Rpb25zQGZyZWVic2Qub3JnIG9uIGJlaGFsZiBvZiBB cnRodXIgQ2hhbmNlIiA8b3duZXItZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcgb24gYmVo YWxmIG9mIGZyZWVic2RAcWVuZy1oby5vcmc+IHdyb3RlOg0KDQo+T24gMTUvMDMvMjAxNiAxNzo1 MiwgQXJ0aHVyIENoYW5jZSB3cm90ZToNCj4+IE9uIDE1LzAzLzIwMTYgMTY6MzIsIEd1eSBIYXJy aXNvbiB3cm90ZToNCj4+Pg0KPj4+IEhJIEZvbGtzLA0KPj4+DQo+Pj4gSSBqdXN0IHdhbnRlZCB0 byBjaGVjayBJJ20gZ2V0dGluZyBjb3JyZWN0IGJlaGF2aW91ciAnY29zIEknbSBubyBleHBlcnQg b24gDQo+Pj4gdGhlc2UgdGhpbmdzIQ0KPj4+DQo+Pj4gSSd2ZSBidWlsdCBhbiBpc2NzaSBlbmFi bGVkIGtlcm5lbCBmb3IgdGhlIHJhc3BiZXJyeSBwaSAoYWthIGRlYmlhbiBqZXNzaWUpDQo+PiAN Cj4+IFlvdSdyZSBhc2tpbmcgYWJvdXQgRGViaWFuLCBhIExpbnV4IGRpc3Rybywgb24gYSBGcmVl QlNEIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdC4NCj4+IE5vdCBxdWl0ZSBhcyBiYWQgYXMgYXNraW5nIGFib3V0IFdp bmRvd3Mgb24gYSBNYWMgT1MgbGlzdCwgYnV0IHlvdSdkIGJlDQo+PiBtdWNoIGJldHRlciBvZmYg ZmluZCBhIERlYmlhbiBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QgdG8gYXNrIG9uLiBUcnkgbG9va2luZyBoZXJlDQo+ PiANCj4+IGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmRlYmlhbi5vcmcvTWFpbGluZ0xpc3RzLw0KPg0KPkFjaywgc2hv dWxkbid0IGJlIHNvIGhhc3R5LCBqdXN0IHNwb3R0ZWQgeW91ciB1bmFtZSAtYSBiZWxvdy4gVGhh dCA4LjINCj5pcyB3YXkgb3V0IG9mIGRhdGUgdGhvdWdoLiBJJ2xsIGxldCBzb21lb25lIGJldHRl ciB2ZXJzZWQgaW4gZGhjcGQNCj5oYW5kbGUgdGhlIHJlc3QuDQo+DQo+Pj4gYW5kIHRoZSBpbml0 cmQgaXMgb2J0YWluaW5nIGEgZmlyc3QgSVAgYWRkcmVzcyB0aGVuIHdoZW4gdGhlIGtlcm5lbCBw cm9wZXIgDQo+Pj4gYm9vdHMgYSBzZWNvbmQgSVAgYWRkcmVzcyBpcyBvYnRhaW5lZC4gQm90aCBh cmUgYm91bmQgdG8gZXRoMC4NCj4+Pg0KPj4+IFthZG1pbkBzZHZtZjY0ZG5zIH4vZXRjXSQgZGhj cGQgLS12ZXJzaW9uDQo+Pj4gaXNjLWRoY3BkLVYzLjEuMnAxDQo+Pj4NCj4+PiBbYWRtaW5Ac2R2 bWY2NGRucyB+XSQgdW5hbWUgLWENCj4+PiBGcmVlQlNEIHNkdm1mNjRkbnMuc3dhbXBkb2cgOC4y LVJFTEVBU0UtcDQgRnJlZUJTRCA4LjItUkVMRUFTRS1wNCAjMTogVGh1IA0KPj4+IE9jdCAyNyAx NDoyNjozNiBCU1QgMjAxMSAgICAgDQo+Pj4gcm9vdEBzZHZtZjY0ZG5zLnN3YW1wZG9nOi91c3Iv b2JqL3Vzci9zcmMvc3lzL0dFTkVSSUMgIGFtZDY0DQo+Pj4NCj4+PiBUaGUgcHJvYmxlbSBpcyB0 aGUgc2Vjb25kIElQIGFkZHJlc3MgaXMgImtub3duIiBpbiB0aGF0ICduc2xvb2t1cCcga25vd3Mg dGhlIA0KPj4+IHBpIG5hbWUgYW5kIHNvIGZvcnRoLi4NCj4+Pg0KPj4+IGxlYXNlIDE5Mi4xNjgu MS40NSB7DQo+Pj4gICBzdGFydHMgNCAyMDE2LzAzLzEwIDE0OjU1OjA1Ow0KPj4+ICAgZW5kcyA0 IDIwMTYvMDMvMTAgMTU6MDU6MDU7DQo+Pj4gICBjbHR0IDQgMjAxNi8wMy8xMCAxNDo1NTowNTsN Cj4+PiAgIGJpbmRpbmcgc3RhdGUgYWN0aXZlOw0KPj4+ICAgbmV4dCBiaW5kaW5nIHN0YXRlIGZy ZWU7DQo+Pj4gICBoYXJkd2FyZSBldGhlcm5ldCBiODoyNzplYjowZjozMjo2NDsNCj4+PiAgIHVp ZCAiXDAwMVwyNzAnXDM1M1wwMTcyZCI7DQo+Pj4gICBzZXQgZGRucy1yZXYtbmFtZSA9ICI0NS4x LjE2OC4xOTIuaW4tYWRkci5hcnBhIjsNCj4+PiAgIHNldCBkZG5zLXR4dCA9ICIzMTg3ODhjYWVj ODk0NDczNGE5ZTBjMmZlNDE4YzlkYjZmIjsNCj4+PiAgIHNldCBkZG5zLWZ3ZC1uYW1lID0gInBp MDUuc3dhbXBkb2ciOw0KPj4+ICAgY2xpZW50LWhvc3RuYW1lICJwaTA1IjsNCj4+PiB9DQo+Pj4N Cj4+PiAuLndoZXJlYXMgdGhlIGZpcnN0IElQLi4NCj4+Pg0KPj4+IGxlYXNlIDE5Mi4xNjguMS41 MyB7DQo+Pj4gICBzdGFydHMgMyAyMDE2LzAzLzA5IDE0OjA5OjI3Ow0KPj4+ICAgZW5kcyAzIDIw MTYvMDMvMDkgMTQ6MTk6Mjc7DQo+Pj4gICB0c3RwIDMgMjAxNi8wMy8wOSAxNDoxOToyNzsNCj4+ PiAgIGNsdHQgMyAyMDE2LzAzLzA5IDE0OjA5OjI3Ow0KPj4+ICAgYmluZGluZyBzdGF0ZSBmcmVl Ow0KPj4+ICAgaGFyZHdhcmUgZXRoZXJuZXQgYjg6Mjc6ZWI6MGY6MzI6NjQ7DQo+Pj4gfQ0KPj4+ DQo+Pj4gLi5vbmx5IGFwcGVhcnMgdGhlIG9uY2UsIG9uIGJvb3QuIFRoaXMgaXMgdGhlIElQIGFk ZHJlc3MgYnkgd2hpY2ggdGhlIGlzY3NpIA0KPj4+IHRhcmdldCBrbm93cyB0aGUgcGkgYW5kIGl0 IGV4cGlyZXMhDQo+Pj4NCj4+PiBJIHdhcyBleHBlY3RpbmcgdGhlIGZpcnN0ICouNTMgSVAgdG8g YmUgaW5oZXJpdGVkIGJ5IHRoZSBrZXJuZWwgcmF0aGVyIHRoYW4gDQo+Pj4gaXQgZ28gb2J0YWlu IHRoZSBzZWNvbmQgKi40NSBJUCBhZGRyZXNzLiBJcyBjb3JyZWN0Pw0KPj4+DQo+Pj4gSWYgc28s IHdoYXQgZG8gSSBuZWVkIHRvIGJlIGRvaW5nIHRvIGdldCB0aGF0IHRvIGhhcHBlbj8NCj4+Pg0K Pj4+IEkndmUgZ29vZ2xlZCB0aGlzIHRvIGRlYXRoIGFuZCBub3QgZW5jb3VudGVyZWQgdGhpcyBw cmVjaXNlIHByb2JsZW0uDQo+Pj4NCj4+PiBUSUENCj4+PiBHdXkNCj4+Pg0KPj4+DQo+Pj4gX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCj4+PiBmcmVlYnNk LXF1ZXN0aW9uc0BmcmVlYnNkLm9yZyBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QNCj4+PiBodHRwczovL2xpc3RzLmZy ZWVic2Qub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnMNCj4+PiBUbyB1bnN1 YnNjcmliZSwgc2VuZCBhbnkgbWFpbCB0byAiZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnMtdW5zdWJzY3JpYmVA ZnJlZWJzZC5vcmciDQo+Pj4NCj4+IA0KPj4gDQo+DQo+DQo+LS0gDQo+TW9vcmUncyBMYXcgb2Yg TWFkIFNjaWVuY2U6IEV2ZXJ5IGVpZ2h0ZWVuIG1vbnRocywgdGhlIG1pbmltdW0gSVENCj5uZWNl c3NhcnkgdG8gZGVzdHJveSB0aGUgd29ybGQgZHJvcHMgYnkgb25lIHBvaW50Lg0KPl9fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQo+ZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlv bnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0DQo+aHR0cHM6Ly9saXN0cy5mcmVlYnNkLm9yZy9t YWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2ZyZWVic2QtcXVlc3Rpb25zDQo+VG8gdW5zdWJzY3JpYmUsIHNlbmQg YW55IG1haWwgdG8gImZyZWVic2QtcXVlc3Rpb25zLXVuc3Vic2NyaWJlQGZyZWVic2Qub3JnIg0K From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Mar 15 21:16:52 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C2EAD0B0A for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 21:16:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noreply@auburn.edu) Received: from ipo2.cc.utah.edu (ipo2.cc.utah.edu [155.97.144.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.utah.edu", Issuer "InCommon Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 990152D5D for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 21:16:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noreply@auburn.edu) Message-Id: <785fe9$2qcduc@ipo2smtp.cc.utah.edu> X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,341,1455001200"; d="scan'208,217";a="94779340" Received: from fm00102.ad.utah.edu (HELO Seun-PC.net.utah.edu) ([155.101.240.184]) by ipo2smtp.cc.utah.edu with ESMTP; 15 Mar 2016 15:15:44 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: You Have 1 New Faculty Message!(freebsd-questions@freebsd.org) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "Do_Not_Reply" Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 22:15:41 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: Mail message body X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 21:16:52 -0000 You have receive a new course work message's by blackboard = = Review the link below to read your message's = https//course.blackboard.passport.edu/login/freebsd-questions@freebsd.org = Blackboard Faculty Message! = =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Mar 15 21:32:38 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E53AD1213 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 21:32:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gfh@swampdog.co.uk) Received: from mx1.solardns.com (mx1.solardns.com [109.73.127.119]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A964222F for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 21:32:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gfh@swampdog.co.uk) Received: from titan.solardns.com ([213.129.84.167]) by mx1.solardns.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1afwYr-0005bi-LI for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 21:31:32 +0000 Received: from [81.109.74.232] (port=32835 helo=sd.swampdog) by titan.solardns.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.86_1) (envelope-from ) id 1afwYr-003cm7-DK for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 21:31:29 +0000 From: Guy Harrison To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: dhcpd, iscsi and a raspberry pi Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 21:31:22 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 References: <201603151632.14124.gfh@swampdog.co.uk> <56E84CA8.4080603@qeng-ho.org> <4D586A3A-9972-427D-B32D-90806B0C0AB7@thehowies.com> In-Reply-To: <4D586A3A-9972-427D-B32D-90806B0C0AB7@thehowies.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201603152131.23144.gfh@swampdog.co.uk> X-AuthUser: swampdog X-Filter-ID: s0sct1PQhAABKnZB5plbIY0Wf8WMyPuXHU+XUfPiEwcD4Rd/h6nhaQ7ZruH71MWktHFHLxtsn9wx dKyKAPnphQR4+0K7G1KvSa5ZSxPOujd2vxpKI0nPnfcNMKzMVl0ZgZ/Tw6DoY/8c2+5B5/2kISDH pDYvAGz9SvCxHRSxuIa29ZM1Gnd6vbPA8wVHr1jEg/iPHj90GCRU69AW3g2Gfi3breeaRmS0N1SH eKK+UkYtlPa/1nUwnw/hoHgr71b/vCrJPmnnTHzVkpybMK7ZTSEhnb66958pLGInGdL26Gs7lfzu /tPONwh9XNOtDyHaCxAmFTLzJB9zUoZ7ZW57niXMjKy9q3SRj7Q2gxGEk++TEtSxjwHNYb/2LiS7 Aj0AWhTXYlwXE+/uHic0AZ4kmrFUBlt3lbnvUeKEYqy8QDYdQk7XGXTfKeB6w9EPnG9cwaEh4MHC ziS+7iGBWJgglPOW6bvL9DC431WlF1LxckxUtEzMQ8hG9MbEN0FihoziP1MA7ED7gs165rpid68f E6luiuQKW35wYye6nyYrkIlIr+mi9pmJxFJZniBtPSj46J1fhOzjF0b4LXcjJZ5lojV3tFdAoO2u Gco+Sc/igH4lkBSh9vJu6q0AAzXqBj9opKSnwxkGqROms5EUtztdTJjbPrNfgmP1oCYIL5fOtJM= X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@mx1.solardns.com X-Filter-Fingerprint: IFrWXGses7OKB5S5G8/dJdIz5bb8V0ykx8BnFBnunHBA3cTUQ1R++keuE7RDJ8Kg3RbMLUalw1oC mj99/u+Poh38tEMU4IgC4sNz49qn3HHnhRv/ZJ3kEy8bfiAr+Fb/UpndEJ0YoaLytXXo8BMTaVt0 ARHRi6XGuAluI1udprGClI6bm+u9ssQgM5AHe3Zacv4uJct5wtJvPpZ2dlBHCwDSxr3Vz+LJ/RhM 2JZ0ECN5dnq47RWft7iCyM9+PbHelB4qP9S6mTzNwoPraFy6ieiDqMHb2a0eZvGOvr7RaxKWGCKO us9nABr0Pk/4CplP X-Originating-IP: 213.129.84.167 X-SpamExperts-Domain: out.solardns.com X-SpamExperts-Username: 213.129.84.167 Authentication-Results: solardns.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=213.129.84.167@out.solardns.com X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Class: ham X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.00) X-Recommended-Action: accept X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 21:32:38 -0000 Hi John, On Tuesday 15 March 2016 19:46:26 John Howie wrote: > Hi Guy, > > When the Raspberry Pi boots it will use DHCP several times. The first is > in UBOOT, and twice when the kernel boots (based on my own observations, > and configuration). Using Windows Server DHCP Server, I was able to use > the MAC address to guarantee that the Pi got the same IP address each > time. Your mileage with ISC-DHCPD may vary. I am no expert with that DHCP > server so can offer no advice on how to make it work in a similar fashion > to Windows Server. I can achieve a similar result to yourself by editing dhcpd.conf to insert the MAC.. host pi05 { hardware ethernet b8:27:eb:0f:32:64; fixed-address pi05.swampdog; } ..and inserting A/PTR forward and reverse records for 'named' so at least that prevents the dual IP allocation. There's always a catch: the background on this is I can't have the pi hostname tried to the hardware - it needs to follow the sdcard around iyswim. I guess the question now is - how can I achieve the same result but without needing the above in dhcpd.conf? TIA Guy > Regards, > > John > > On 3/15/16, 10:55 AM, "owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org on behalf of Arthur Chance" wrote: > >On 15/03/2016 17:52, Arthur Chance wrote: > >> On 15/03/2016 16:32, Guy Harrison wrote: > >>> HI Folks, > >>> > >>> I just wanted to check I'm getting correct behaviour 'cos I'm no > >>> expert on these things! > >>> > >>> I've built an iscsi enabled kernel for the raspberry pi (aka debian > >>> jessie) > >> > >> You're asking about Debian, a Linux distro, on a FreeBSD mailing list. > >> Not quite as bad as asking about Windows on a Mac OS list, but you'd > >> be much better off find a Debian mailing list to ask on. Try looking > >> here > >> > >> https://www.debian.org/MailingLists/ > > > >Ack, shouldn't be so hasty, just spotted your uname -a below. That 8.2 > >is way out of date though. I'll let someone better versed in dhcpd > >handle the rest. > > > >>> and the initrd is obtaining a first IP address then when the kernel > >>> proper boots a second IP address is obtained. Both are bound to eth0. > >>> > >>> [admin@sdvmf64dns ~/etc]$ dhcpd --version > >>> isc-dhcpd-V3.1.2p1 > >>> > >>> [admin@sdvmf64dns ~]$ uname -a > >>> FreeBSD sdvmf64dns.swampdog 8.2-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p4 #1: > >>> Thu Oct 27 14:26:36 BST 2011 > >>> root@sdvmf64dns.swampdog:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > >>> > >>> The problem is the second IP address is "known" in that 'nslookup' > >>> knows the pi name and so forth.. > >>> > >>> lease 192.168.1.45 { > >>> starts 4 2016/03/10 14:55:05; > >>> ends 4 2016/03/10 15:05:05; > >>> cltt 4 2016/03/10 14:55:05; > >>> binding state active; > >>> next binding state free; > >>> hardware ethernet b8:27:eb:0f:32:64; > >>> uid "\001\270'\353\0172d"; > >>> set ddns-rev-name = "45.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa"; > >>> set ddns-txt = "318788caec8944734a9e0c2fe418c9db6f"; > >>> set ddns-fwd-name = "pi05.swampdog"; > >>> client-hostname "pi05"; > >>> } > >>> > >>> ..whereas the first IP.. > >>> > >>> lease 192.168.1.53 { > >>> starts 3 2016/03/09 14:09:27; > >>> ends 3 2016/03/09 14:19:27; > >>> tstp 3 2016/03/09 14:19:27; > >>> cltt 3 2016/03/09 14:09:27; > >>> binding state free; > >>> hardware ethernet b8:27:eb:0f:32:64; > >>> } > >>> > >>> ..only appears the once, on boot. This is the IP address by which the > >>> iscsi target knows the pi and it expires! > >>> > >>> I was expecting the first *.53 IP to be inherited by the kernel > >>> rather than it go obtain the second *.45 IP address. Is correct? > >>> > >>> If so, what do I need to be doing to get that to happen? > >>> > >>> I've googled this to death and not encountered this precise problem. > >>> > >>> TIA > >>> Guy > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > >-- > >Moore's Law of Mad Science: Every eighteen months, the minimum IQ > >necessary to destroy the world drops by one point. > >_______________________________________________ > >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Mar 15 21:56:40 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6E36AD2546 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 21:56:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86CC0CF2 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 21:56:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id EB5A033C28; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:56:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Guy Harrison Cc: "freebsd-questions\@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: dhcpd, iscsi and a raspberry pi References: <201603151632.14124.gfh@swampdog.co.uk> <56E84CA8.4080603@qeng-ho.org> <4D586A3A-9972-427D-B32D-90806B0C0AB7@thehowies.com> <201603152131.23144.gfh@swampdog.co.uk> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:56:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: <201603152131.23144.gfh@swampdog.co.uk> (Guy Harrison's message of "Tue, 15 Mar 2016 21:31:22 +0000") Message-ID: <44egbbiewf.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 21:56:40 -0000 Guy Harrison writes: > Hi John, > > On Tuesday 15 March 2016 19:46:26 John Howie wrote: >> Hi Guy, >> >> When the Raspberry Pi boots it will use DHCP several times. The first is >> in UBOOT, and twice when the kernel boots (based on my own observations, >> and configuration). Using Windows Server DHCP Server, I was able to use >> the MAC address to guarantee that the Pi got the same IP address each >> time. Your mileage with ISC-DHCPD may vary. I am no expert with that DHCP >> server so can offer no advice on how to make it work in a similar fashion >> to Windows Server. > > I can achieve a similar result to yourself by editing dhcpd.conf to insert > the MAC.. > > host pi05 { > hardware ethernet b8:27:eb:0f:32:64; > fixed-address pi05.swampdog; > } > > ..and inserting A/PTR forward and reverse records for 'named' so at least > that prevents the dual IP allocation. > > There's always a catch: the background on this is I can't have the pi > hostname tried to the hardware - it needs to follow the sdcard around > iyswim. U-Boot stores the MAC address in its environment. For the (proprietary) boards I work on, I had to patch the U-Boot version of the appropriate Ethernet driver so that it would read the Ethernet address out of an EPROM. > I guess the question now is - how can I achieve the same result but without > needing the above in dhcpd.conf? I thought dhcpd would use MAC address if the client didn't provide anything else. I'll check if I get a chance. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Mar 15 22:41:20 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97D63AD11A9 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 22:41:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 756AA794 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 22:41:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from lowell-desk.lan (router.lan [172.30.250.2]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83D7833C22; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:41:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 276603981C; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:41:10 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Guy Harrison , "freebsd-questions\@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: dhcpd, iscsi and a raspberry pi References: <201603151632.14124.gfh@swampdog.co.uk> <56E84CA8.4080603@qeng-ho.org> <4D586A3A-9972-427D-B32D-90806B0C0AB7@thehowies.com> <201603152131.23144.gfh@swampdog.co.uk> <44egbbiewf.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Reply-To: "freebsd-questions\@freebsd.org" Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:41:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <44egbbiewf.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> (Lowell Gilbert's message of "Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:56:32 -0400") Message-ID: <4437rrjreh.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 22:41:20 -0000 Lowell Gilbert writes: > I thought dhcpd would use MAC address if the client didn't provide > anything else. I'll check if I get a chance. Confirmed. My dual-boot machine has no special settings in the server's dhcp.conf, and gets the same address regardless of which OS it's using. It even offers a different hostname on each OS. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Mar 15 23:06:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A656DAD198E for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 23:06:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu) Received: from cosmo.uchicago.edu (cosmo.uchicago.edu [128.135.70.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80E18649 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 23:06:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu) Received: by cosmo.uchicago.edu (Postfix, from userid 48) id 6C7D1CB8CC3; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:06:12 -0500 (CDT) Received: from 128.135.52.6 (SquirrelMail authenticated user valeri) by cosmo.uchicago.edu with HTTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:06:12 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <26023.128.135.52.6.1458083172.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> In-Reply-To: <4437rrjreh.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> References: <201603151632.14124.gfh@swampdog.co.uk> <56E84CA8.4080603@qeng-ho.org> <4D586A3A-9972-427D-B32D-90806B0C0AB7@thehowies.com> <201603152131.23144.gfh@swampdog.co.uk> <44egbbiewf.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <4437rrjreh.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:06:12 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: dhcpd, iscsi and a raspberry pi From: "Valeri Galtsev" To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Cc: "Guy Harrison" , "freebsd-questions\@freebsd.org" Reply-To: galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.el5.centos.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 23:06:19 -0000 On Tue, March 15, 2016 5:41 pm, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Lowell Gilbert writes: > >> I thought dhcpd would use MAC address Correct: DHCP server uses MAC address to identify clients. DHCP server can be configured to give some client (identified by MAC address) the same IP (thus making that client appear with static IP. Windoze world calls this "DHCP reservation") >> if the client didn't provide >> anything else. I'll check if I get a chance. > > Confirmed. My dual-boot machine has no special settings in the server's > dhcp.conf, and gets the same address regardless of which OS it's using. > It even offers a different hostname on each OS. If DHCP lease didn't expire, DHCP server will give client the same IP (the one that is in still valid DHCP lease for this client). This is what most likely you observe. If DHCP client never goes away from network, chance is it never will change IP (unless DHCP server is specifically configured to not give client the same IP when lease is renewed. I forgot details how it is done, I never do it on my DHCP servers). Hostname: if you are using "hostname" command it reports system hostname which is configured internally in system configuration files (which particular files depends on the system). This name will be reported no matter which IP the machine gets - except special cases, like on macintosh where machine changes it's hostname (known to the machine internally) depending on network connection. This is rare thing (and drives same person crazy, programmers who write license daemons often can not "outsmart" macintosh here). I hope this clarifies some things. Valeri ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Mar 15 23:17:48 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 092CFAD1E0C for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 23:17:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gfh@swampdog.co.uk) Received: from mx1.solardns.com (mx1.solardns.com [109.73.127.119]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0CEEA9A for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 23:17:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gfh@swampdog.co.uk) Received: from titan.solardns.com ([213.129.84.167]) by mx1.solardns.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1afyCe-0001bK-6E for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 23:16:42 +0000 Received: from [81.109.74.232] (port=38595 helo=sd.swampdog) by titan.solardns.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.86_1) (envelope-from ) id 1afyCd-001VJO-Qn for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 23:16:39 +0000 From: Guy Harrison To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dhcpd, iscsi and a raspberry pi Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 23:16:32 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 References: <201603151632.14124.gfh@swampdog.co.uk> <44egbbiewf.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <4437rrjreh.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> In-Reply-To: <4437rrjreh.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201603152316.33023.gfh@swampdog.co.uk> X-AuthUser: swampdog X-Filter-ID: s0sct1PQhAABKnZB5plbIY0Wf8WMyPuXHU+XUfPiEwcD4Rd/h6nhaQ7ZruH71MWktHFHLxtsn9wx dKyKAPnphQR4+0K7G1KvSa5ZSxPOujd2vxpKI0nPnfcNMKzMVl0ZgZ/Tw6DoY/8c2+5B5/2kISDH pDYvAGz9SvCxHRSxuIYPZoMXQeETwaq2Vyw/iZPFKnKMdgS7qPMf8ZfmZxgdXi3breeaRmS0N1SH eKK+UkYtlPa/1nUwnw/hoHgr71b/vCrJPmnnTHzVkpybMK7ZTSEhnb66958pLGInGdL26Gs7lfzu /tPONwh9XNOtDyHaCxAmFTLzJB9zUoZ7ZW57niXMjKy9q3SRj7Q2gxGEk++TEtSxjwHNYb/2LiS7 Aj0AWhTXYlwXE+/uHic0AZ4kmrFUBlt3lbnvUeKEYqy8QDYdQk7XGXTfKeB6w9EPnG9cwaEh4MHC ziS+7iGBWJgglPOW6bvL9DC431WlF1LxckxUtEzMQ8hG9MbEN0FihoziP1MA7ED7gs165rpid68f E6luiuQKW35wYye6nyYrkIlIr+mi9pmJxFJZniBtPSj46J1fhOzjF0b4LXcjJZ5lojV3tFdAoO2u Gco+Sc/igH4lkBSh9vJu6q0AAzXqBj9opKSnwxkGqROms5EUtztdTJjbPrNfgmP1oCYIL5fOtJM= X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@mx1.solardns.com X-Filter-Fingerprint: IFrWXGses7OKB5S5G8/dJdIz5bb8V0ykx8BnFBnunHBA3cTUQ1R++keuE7RDJ8Kg3RbMLUalw1oC mj99/u+PoqoVy8a3lsStJtAvpObFX0XnhRv/ZJ3kEy8bfiAr+Fb/UpndEJ0YoaLytXXo8BMTaVt0 ARHRi6XGuAluI1udprEFZG3LO9fkj7mb1+yRqli/d+zCSxvHphGqsF3hVtrEAf060QZ1FCJg7pbn CIpFp9M/hyUYo7G4LptAg5oSVRfFcobWokYzpFpNjdVH7bJEoA== X-Originating-IP: 213.129.84.167 X-SpamExperts-Domain: out.solardns.com X-SpamExperts-Username: 213.129.84.167 Authentication-Results: solardns.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=213.129.84.167@out.solardns.com X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Class: ham X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.00) X-Recommended-Action: accept X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 23:17:48 -0000 On Tuesday 15 March 2016 22:41:10 Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Lowell Gilbert writes: > > I thought dhcpd would use MAC address if the client didn't provide > > anything else. I'll check if I get a chance. > > Confirmed. My dual-boot machine has no special settings in the server's > dhcp.conf, and gets the same address regardless of which OS it's using. > It even offers a different hostname on each OS. Cheers. It's beginning to look like it's the lack of client information from the first (initrd *.53) dhcp request that may be the cause. If that's the case then I can rule out.. set ddns-rev-name = "45.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa"; set ddns-fwd-name = "pi05.swampdog"; client-hostname "pi05"; ..and go figure out what how.. uid "\001\270'\353\0172d"; set ddns-txt = "318788caec8944734a9e0c2fe418c9db6f"; ..figure in the scheme of things. TIA Guy From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Mar 15 23:56:16 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 402A2AD2A2E for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 23:56:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mokomull@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk0-x22f.google.com (mail-vk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F064DF4B for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 23:56:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mokomull@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id e6so41983059vkh.2 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 16:56:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=D+u87XacdLbQdkX3WZReS1sjIKwBOK9WLL8B8Pkc02w=; b=hPUJYPLK7HSMeyqfu75Z9Xef+2Ei+tPJrcm+5jhn0GZ311epXxUXJCm65xaLs6FWgs 0cQsa0LCOwOrUSG5jfcblLMZORHqPwSQs3BM9FRIEpVsN+llqcIk/qGePdrCzxidLZIY CTUgIfqd2K3tQuuLaFi0KQ8A7PXBoMLkYhCHQkEF+BJMvrySBZbL8fwuFWvw8zHoGsAy 9gavnCSlDTO0LyiMg7AVKQBcUuvjmLuvLUSa05CkSoc52wEqvuFESZ4Iw7ynh3Bn/HGk JqwB03xni9EVR60tr/siqNWTqku/Krl6yF6sTi/4zn8V44J5/vSLcluEC+b1jQz/Yd46 MJaA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=D+u87XacdLbQdkX3WZReS1sjIKwBOK9WLL8B8Pkc02w=; b=Ig/4XPRAsAZQByFIz4YMvDP0xjCR2n4Ye2l2e9A2LnY/rqP8FSPnGbmTVGNPTahKBm WsxHqxPpiMOFwDTnCOq+WwP22E7YQz9I/B/OfXh2B5gs55/ZLlei9FjQnFbVCJ+rJ3To kxf/BDxs3aT3qqYA/p0oZEoP7Wiud1IeV5/fTQyDLXojURiAuPVY4zOLpE1pqve1MLjR I98G8x8cWAJtluVTEzmzh+lmfaEU9vpKMK7NK66Cb/8iDIpQmn5hKa4ObBtr5bP1jM/6 SDdH5xvXbaN0L8FUPf6cXZNwwQ5ESseusdEyCP9CDYCWYVspVB72qsxcGw76PU5KLhkZ BCkQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKXnbprQf2i6X7+rzDRS8SfAMnQHPKZri0pOjwWkNKnDH6A2tvM+fGtfkySS/F8SAvefiMw1HhjTYHaDA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.31.152.130 with SMTP id a124mr998971vke.54.1458086175030; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 16:56:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.176.69.199 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 16:56:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201603152316.33023.gfh@swampdog.co.uk> References: <201603151632.14124.gfh@swampdog.co.uk> <44egbbiewf.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <4437rrjreh.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <201603152316.33023.gfh@swampdog.co.uk> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 16:56:14 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: dhcpd, iscsi and a raspberry pi From: Matt Mullins To: Guy Harrison Cc: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 23:56:16 -0000 On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Guy Harrison wrote: > On Tuesday 15 March 2016 22:41:10 Lowell Gilbert wrote: > > Lowell Gilbert writes: > > > I thought dhcpd would use MAC address if the client didn't provide > > > anything else. I'll check if I get a chance. > > > > Confirmed. My dual-boot machine has no special settings in the server's > > dhcp.conf, and gets the same address regardless of which OS it's using. > > It even offers a different hostname on each OS. > > Cheers. It's beginning to look like it's the lack of client information from > the first (initrd *.53) dhcp request that may be the cause. If that's the > case then I can rule out.. > > ..and go figure out what how.. > > uid "\001\270'\353\0172d"; uid is the cause. DUID was added to dhcpv4 in RFC 4361, and a dhcpd that understands the option will treat different DUIDs as separate devices even if they have the same MAC address. You might want to remove "send dhcp-client-identifier = hardware;" from your /etc/dhcp/dhclient.conf (or equivalent) on your Raspberry Pi. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Mar 16 04:11:14 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3768AD22DD for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 04:11:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B37E9659 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 04:11:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u2G4B9lI032317 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 15 Mar 2016 22:11:10 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id u2G4B958032314; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 22:11:09 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 22:11:09 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Doug Hardie cc: FreeBSD Questions , Polytropon Subject: Re: Upcoming Releases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20160305181742.9c3abe96.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 15 Mar 2016 22:11:10 -0600 (MDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 04:11:15 -0000 On Wed, 9 Mar 2016, Doug Hardie wrote: > I recently saw a comment in one of the maillists that 11.0 was likely > to have the new packetized base feature. That tells me that 11.0 is > most likely to be dicey to work with. I am reminded when the new pkg > system came out and the supporting servers were compromised. To the best of my knowledge, there was no relation between pkg and any compromises. Any new release is bound to have problems. But this one is likely to be smoother than most, as many of the developers and most of the cluster have been running -HEAD as part of the "dogfood" program. Problems are found and fixed early. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Mar 16 05:20:14 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEF33AD2A74 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 05:20:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from mail.lafn.org (static-71-177-216-148.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [71.177.216.148]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBE287B9 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 05:20:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from [10.0.1.12] (unknown [10.0.1.12]) by mail.lafn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 82B5B114C322; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 22:20:07 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\)) Subject: Re: Upcoming Releases From: Doug Hardie In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 22:20:07 -0700 Cc: FreeBSD Questions , Polytropon Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20160305181742.9c3abe96.freebsd@edvax.de> To: Warren Block X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at mail X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 05:20:14 -0000 > On 15 March 2016, at 21:11, Warren Block wrote: >=20 > On Wed, 9 Mar 2016, Doug Hardie wrote: >=20 >> I recently saw a comment in one of the maillists that 11.0 was likely = to have the new packetized base feature. That tells me that 11.0 is = most likely to be dicey to work with. I am reminded when the new pkg = system came out and the supporting servers were compromised. >=20 > To the best of my knowledge, there was no relation between pkg and any = compromises. There was a period where the regular pkg servers were not available = because they had to be rebuilt. I don't recall the dates. It was not = pkg_ng, but the first major revision to pkg after that. >=20 > Any new release is bound to have problems. But this one is likely to = be smoother than most, as many of the developers and most of the cluster = have been running -HEAD as part of the "dogfood" program. Problems are = found and fixed early. =E2=80=94 Doug From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Mar 16 07:55:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06961AD2EF2 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 07:55:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christopher.hope.cookie@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-x22f.google.com (mail-lb0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80D741312 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 07:55:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christopher.hope.cookie@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lb0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id bc4so42454335lbc.2 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 00:55:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=5bA0WsSkfWp/1i361KXs7jSzF5RV0DM14NzGK040PmI=; b=D/EObY5kv0QOY+epBLBL9UbICcqJ7fKEj0/PUNhK7KTO8YPrwrV94XJGDkwSmqtffo MjysfA/Klz0+DQff16Ru3y5MGU9MujkfsxbwGkWW6B3C4pYCY51ewxxst9qBPHazwE4g qQYA/nYV8LFyMK6YgizhqiRu2TfxA/O2f4lcKU8ysu6HpPDyvGadi2XWRrpew5fPQ8U0 mOg12LGg1T8G6Rk6pZezrGhhtW6CNrrkMzu9ETErZBja0M2N9nafd0dud8F72Yw8RWxe VgUhiexDTFtOK46Pq0t/MOMUWwAz0zYNDDKFHobBjbSneaabDjVxuNnC5KkM47vroLpc dsEA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=5bA0WsSkfWp/1i361KXs7jSzF5RV0DM14NzGK040PmI=; b=fITsChm2U0yBaj5a/cls7/E21bg8B9sJkvIifFMAbnNzZg9vTr5U290PQuEKbL8UTc ctLWzsjkY6RN71KpuiE7AL5oPIXOS1ryxHrxlBfRFuHg0ArbiBt0u6Dh1MdIdmH9DR/6 dNc7l3CqG0ZanDbhpNWLk1z/g7pxkF4pIrfNmbgtkosw9GMriySOVir8NHjtxz6Kq92r wDPxGSMWfBFagkbgJY0FSaZO9tl60K/DAQkqQohiem70jwE+R8z/u91uUE9jeXrqZlFS fRnb7JPX6athN/kGUjhMuvhHaoRsdvC+ko0dGq1IHw5IzARvfjfnr/PMnpDE/Yfu15S7 CmFw== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJVmuGjl+HFzQCPj32zl97K7h8ZRrDcqGQmONi7U3HQNbBLJfvdrP2nY5e/vp0ua/S1LSmH5HvqbysDGQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.134.202 with SMTP id pm10mr810430lbb.36.1458114916693; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 00:55:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.21.24 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 00:55:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:55:16 +1100 Message-ID: Subject: Best freBDS 64bit version or fork for ~2001-2002 DEC Aplha? From: Chris Hope To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 07:55:19 -0000 Before you scan and bin as spam.... Would search forums if I could though too much the noobian to know what to search for. ___ As pre-purchase research I'm looking to buy a $500-800(AUD) DEC Alpha 64bit home desktop workstation circa 1998-2001. What is the latest kernel 64bit either internal project or recommended fork that supports it (with KDE/Gnome 1 or similar UI). I don't want Solaris. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Mar 16 11:09:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 594E3AD2294 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:09:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2416D87B for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:09:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-32-133.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.32.133]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44FF53CE4A; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:09:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id u2GB9ehM002038; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:09:40 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:09:40 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Chris Hope Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best freBDS 64bit version or fork for ~2001-2002 DEC Aplha? Message-Id: <20160316120940.da515c86.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:09:50 -0000 On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:55:16 +1100, Chris Hope wrote: > As pre-purchase research I'm looking to buy a $500-800(AUD) DEC Alpha 64bit > home desktop workstation circa 1998-2001. > > What is the latest kernel 64bit either internal project or recommended fork > that supports it (with KDE/Gnome 1 or similar UI). I'd say that the current production release FreeBSD/ia64 10.2 is worth a try, as you've stated that it is a 64 bit platform (not to be confused with FreeBSD/amd64). You can get the installation images here: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/ISO-IMAGES/10.2/ Further information for using FreeBSD on this architecture: http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/ia64/index.html https://wiki.freebsd.org/ia64 https://wiki.freebsd.org/ia64/InstallNotes Otherwise, check out FreeBSD/alpha, but keen in mind this branch has been discontinued: https://www.freebsd.org/platforms/alpha.html > I don't want Solaris. Use VMS then. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Mar 16 11:37:45 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 669EAAD1017 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:37:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from uk1mail2513.mymailbank.co.uk (UK1MAIL2513-PERMANET.IE.mymailbank.co.uk [217.69.47.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE40C1980 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:37:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from smtp.lan.sohara.org (UnknownHost [88.151.27.41]) by uk1mail2513-d.mymailbank.co.uk with SMTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:37:13 +0000 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.lan.sohara.org) by smtp.lan.sohara.org with smtp (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ag9lR-000FgK-E8; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:37:21 +0000 Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:37:21 +0000 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Polytropon Subject: Re: Best freBDS 64bit version or fork for ~2001-2002 DEC Aplha? Message-Id: <20160316113721.cc9fbf4ee4f1e9d930178cdc@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <20160316120940.da515c86.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20160316120940.da515c86.freebsd@edvax.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.3 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.1) X-Clacks-Overhead: "GNU Terry Pratchett" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:37:45 -0000 On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:09:40 +0100 Polytropon wrote: > On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:55:16 +1100, Chris Hope wrote: > > As pre-purchase research I'm looking to buy a $500-800(AUD) DEC Alpha > > 64bit home desktop workstation circa 1998-2001. > > > > What is the latest kernel 64bit either internal project or recommended > > fork that supports it (with KDE/Gnome 1 or similar UI). > > I'd say that the current production release FreeBSD/ia64 10.2 ia64 is Itanium, that's not going to run on an Alpha. > Otherwise, check out FreeBSD/alpha, but keen in mind this > branch has been discontinued: > > https://www.freebsd.org/platforms/alpha.html That should do - but it is ancient, ports are likely to be troublesome. NetBSD may be a better option. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Mar 16 11:50:05 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F7B1AD1596; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:50:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) Received: from webmail.dweimer.net (24-240-198-187.static.stls.mo.charter.com [24.240.198.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 403191F0; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:50:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) Received: from webmail.dweimer.local (localhost [10.9.5.2]) by webmail.dweimer.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u2GBNS1c010055 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 16 Mar 2016 06:23:28 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) Received: (from www@localhost) by webmail.dweimer.local (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u2GBNSpo010053; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 06:23:28 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) X-Authentication-Warning: webmail.dweimer.local: www set sender to dweimer@dweimer.net using -f To: Doug Hardie Subject: Re: Upcoming Releases MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 06:23:28 -0500 From: dweimer Cc: Warren Block , Polytropon , FreeBSD Questions , owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Organization: dweimer.net Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net Mail-Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net In-Reply-To: References: <20160305181742.9c3abe96.freebsd@edvax.de> Message-ID: <91216ae32782a50986763e7bc1c3a339@dweimer.net> X-Sender: dweimer@dweimer.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2-beta X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:50:05 -0000 On 2016-03-16 12:20 am, Doug Hardie wrote: >> On 15 March 2016, at 21:11, Warren Block wrote: >> >> On Wed, 9 Mar 2016, Doug Hardie wrote: >> >>> I recently saw a comment in one of the maillists that 11.0 was likely >>> to have the new packetized base feature. That tells me that 11.0 is >>> most likely to be dicey to work with. I am reminded when the new pkg >>> system came out and the supporting servers were compromised. >> >> To the best of my knowledge, there was no relation between pkg and any >> compromises. > > There was a period where the regular pkg servers were not available > because they had to be rebuilt. I don't recall the dates. It was not > pkg_ng, but the first major revision to pkg after that. > It wasn't because of the pkg / pkg_ng update though, if memory servers me correct a committer's username/password was comprised. It was just a coincidence that it happened around the same time update, but wasn't related to it. -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Mar 16 12:07:26 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56BC5AD03E0 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:07:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F6B5EFA for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:07:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-32-133.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.32.133]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E2F2277D5; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 13:07:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id u2GC7GU9002315; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 13:07:16 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 13:07:16 +0100 From: Polytropon To: "Steve O'Hara-Smith" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best freBDS 64bit version or fork for ~2001-2002 DEC Aplha? Message-Id: <20160316130716.c10d580e.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20160316113721.cc9fbf4ee4f1e9d930178cdc@sohara.org> References: <20160316120940.da515c86.freebsd@edvax.de> <20160316113721.cc9fbf4ee4f1e9d930178cdc@sohara.org> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:07:26 -0000 On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:37:21 +0000, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:09:40 +0100 > Polytropon wrote: > > > On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:55:16 +1100, Chris Hope wrote: > > > As pre-purchase research I'm looking to buy a $500-800(AUD) DEC Alpha > > > 64bit home desktop workstation circa 1998-2001. > > > > > > What is the latest kernel 64bit either internal project or recommended > > > fork that supports it (with KDE/Gnome 1 or similar UI). > > > > I'd say that the current production release FreeBSD/ia64 10.2 > > ia64 is Itanium, that's not going to run on an Alpha. Sorry... not compatible with Alpha 64 bit? My mistake... as you can see, I'm out of "non-x86 country" for a long time so I can't even properly recognize the most common architecture names... :-( > > Otherwise, check out FreeBSD/alpha, but keen in mind this > > branch has been discontinued: > > > > https://www.freebsd.org/platforms/alpha.html > > That should do - but it is ancient, ports are likely to be > troublesome. This will only work with older versions of KDE or Gnome (of the requested time period, 10 years ago) as they are in the source repository for that FreeBSD version and the corresponding ports infrastructure. Binary packages are probably still available, but (as well) only for that older system version. > NetBSD may be a better option. Yes, NetBSD support is probably much better - both the OS and the applications are current. http://wiki.netbsd.org/ports/alpha/ NetBSD/alpha 7.0 sure is worth trying. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Mar 16 12:27:11 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84B8BAD0EF9; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:27:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x235.google.com (mail-wm0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C463D08; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:27:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x235.google.com with SMTP id p65so187531242wmp.1; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 05:27:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=oBSePLZcjdXvJvdDIy7WdDmln58XB8dRBcAaHrKhsW4=; b=dS7BxtaYNp7YwYmPQuoc+FM6fUzHsVuXSoaiIcE5Jeh9/YxCNF1EquyjFSe0HCNkli DQiXCxWFKg61eNaU/SkLQwzthxfAXtWBxqPzFDbbKedd9i2ca3/xS0qJE7DnSiF9q6j0 jNpr0edKgdToEl9IgOQEyRujxteJUnQAT9DnfNF+Euqo3uaneZpuNHOFKzWIVND2vkDH je5TXpHnVPSD7HM49tJ1aEYqBsPTqSnnap1XUNiSMweuNxx1Xbs26AMDZjA9tc5StbRg IS9tqNNUlNxOsGtNLiHDvhyOdKbUiFgtPnkxAuFfKkPZx9N6VeEquH28NUOGwkbuukXW b5Mg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=oBSePLZcjdXvJvdDIy7WdDmln58XB8dRBcAaHrKhsW4=; b=bgGUz79YYJ8uwGe6CoI+VY0VhwyKgPHb1M2q4G5IJG8ngXbVT14XEg/8KH+DZ5PRbE VdDME/3zYGGVIBvW4Hn3wgj6m7S81n4bwzOC4V4p+uZkWM1ojS9NsjrNR1G8zoGnENbP OlkSZEjUuX1jMI204FKdgryaa45Y2JtADpROWYnBqd8imOdACboqLaHQnYme8ptjIyau 2XgrszDDmxf83EtUU4gcjzf/t2kN6NfKAnl9+FkpUFv8aGKjcz8pfkcimZXf4EgMURAa UU0EPrMEuKonGS5Adl6okU+OgpxjINfGCHodLWwDbwJvNY0UJ3YRsz27Z1uP1uXXd5mL LAhA== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJNMEl0s6pJeig4Futpd7Dy2F8iAy+ttjk3YHHMsZPpMRgiAr1Q571EMGyYFFxUPNM+GwM3gxrYLUnJWQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.113.130 with SMTP id iy2mr3560355wjb.56.1458131229269; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 05:27:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.28.46.68 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 05:27:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <91216ae32782a50986763e7bc1c3a339@dweimer.net> References: <20160305181742.9c3abe96.freebsd@edvax.de> <91216ae32782a50986763e7bc1c3a339@dweimer.net> Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:27:09 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Upcoming Releases From: krad To: dweimer@dweimer.net Cc: Doug Hardie , Polytropon , FreeBSD Questions , owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:27:11 -0000 That was my understanding of it, and the worry was the package builds could have been compromised. Therefore everything was rebuilt from scratch after an audit had happened. On 16 March 2016 at 11:23, dweimer wrote: > On 2016-03-16 12:20 am, Doug Hardie wrote: > >> On 15 March 2016, at 21:11, Warren Block wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, 9 Mar 2016, Doug Hardie wrote: >>> >>> I recently saw a comment in one of the maillists that 11.0 was likely to >>>> have the new packetized base feature. That tells me that 11.0 is most >>>> likely to be dicey to work with. I am reminded when the new pkg system >>>> came out and the supporting servers were compromised. >>>> >>> >>> To the best of my knowledge, there was no relation between pkg and any >>> compromises. >>> >> >> There was a period where the regular pkg servers were not available >> because they had to be rebuilt. I don't recall the dates. It was not >> pkg_ng, but the first major revision to pkg after that. >> >> > It wasn't because of the pkg / pkg_ng update though, if memory servers me > correct a committer's username/password was comprised. It was just a > coincidence that it happened around the same time update, but wasn't > related to it. > > -- > Thanks, > Dean E. Weimer > http://www.dweimer.net/ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Mar 16 12:54:04 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D37AD27D0 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:54:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from V20103162016080178ei_ofc.8101016@e1.exhibitorinvites.com) Received: from e1.exhibitorinvites.com (e1.exhibitorinvites.com [216.127.132.16]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70F12D24 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:54:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from V20103162016080178ei_ofc.8101016@e1.exhibitorinvites.com) Received: (localhost) by e1.exhibitorinvites.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) Message-Id: From: "Speed Photon Technology" Subject: Register today to see Speed Photon Technology at OFC 2016 Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 08:14:02 -0400 To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:54:04 -0000 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Mar 16 13:23:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A1F6AD2265 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 13:23:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from outbackdingo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf0-x22b.google.com (mail-lf0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDF823B7 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 13:23:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from outbackdingo@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id h198so19048628lfh.0 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 06:23:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=8abtmvqYc2U5MKc74g3W3LmYRWFzFviuiMAqgJDniCE=; b=kCneTZPKgq743XhXlhcYAixjj8CjBu2J3RnfE16Ooz2CrEwiDeQu6UfJbGhQKo8WEX KAKZg2gTIEpaE69rJwSJL1qevuBEUmfKZ0enc4Mi7dAyU2UqFzrycFFoBwr6ssFfHuec XpWA+ytK8lvO1IxyheOOZW2t2E8Gh2d+37OPeM+1eOpCAX6gEZjbKDl1TAR4Yz5OtPK3 7Lss8ncC4UOvB0ML9ytFZfMqN8XCihXxT8SW/n4wQ/bmp0l9qMopdOgstK5PZYlPkVd0 iOV0ghKVMvnXZIMwLkaHSr0QzsGcWqxweX4wPGKzLpNT1KHNesBGy0Zf3KzpSbizVgnL 3Bww== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8abtmvqYc2U5MKc74g3W3LmYRWFzFviuiMAqgJDniCE=; b=C4hCw7DtBghtgGBncWXekUTIfM6k7YIszFG4tyX+hUbFsnGf2ck9jEd94U9Arr37cS jIYNEd45l0ZCX/VxRAD33BiKCjBZ6XvRJy7BauwJzIFJi6ptXrLY7ScIDVPZtKJ1EkWG HLigrmmRQcwHPSopI1EcRnjWOBThSRQ3YwQnSeO6NAF+jrD2GSA17uFhS63sBFXZBt/l LK3kDilp/gQVcwim8D4IG61dZ4FsPvys4JN0rKJzBR/GcnPwbw/5OSzml59Qk3xveCM1 J5hisdrRcX5Ds9Kx0uDC1BcN0sBZMZjU86Vb829PMiT3feaTj1f0fnoGAFwju6p4FI7u d1rg== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIP33uOMI1aBtjqqJcTldX/KcUSHQCsCh61VD4FZknDSwu0GAO0qUQrLFc0PgLf6omN0yQYgmb23Vaqjg== X-Received: by 10.25.37.135 with SMTP id l129mr1484829lfl.160.1458134595718; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 06:23:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.91.12 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 06:22:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160316130716.c10d580e.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20160316120940.da515c86.freebsd@edvax.de> <20160316113721.cc9fbf4ee4f1e9d930178cdc@sohara.org> <20160316130716.c10d580e.freebsd@edvax.de> From: Outback Dingo Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 14:22:36 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Best freBDS 64bit version or fork for ~2001-2002 DEC Aplha? To: Polytropon Cc: "Steve O'Hara-Smith" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 13:23:19 -0000 On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 1:07 PM, Polytropon wrote: > On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:37:21 +0000, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:09:40 +0100 > > Polytropon wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:55:16 +1100, Chris Hope wrote: > > > > As pre-purchase research I'm looking to buy a $500-800(AUD) DEC Alpha > > > > 64bit home desktop workstation circa 1998-2001. > > > > > > > > What is the latest kernel 64bit either internal project or > recommended > > > > fork that supports it (with KDE/Gnome 1 or similar UI). > > > > > > I'd say that the current production release FreeBSD/ia64 10.2 > > > > ia64 is Itanium, that's not going to run on an Alpha. > > Sorry... not compatible with Alpha 64 bit? My mistake... as you > can see, I'm out of "non-x86 country" for a long time so I can't > even properly recognize the most common architecture names... :-( > > > > > > Otherwise, check out FreeBSD/alpha, but keen in mind this > > > branch has been discontinued: > > > > > > https://www.freebsd.org/platforms/alpha.html > > > > That should do - but it is ancient, ports are likely to be > > troublesome. > > This will only work with older versions of KDE or Gnome (of the > requested time period, 10 years ago) as they are in the source > repository for that FreeBSD version and the corresponding ports > infrastructure. Binary packages are probably still available, > but (as well) only for that older system version. > > > > > NetBSD may be a better option. > > Yes, NetBSD support is probably much better - both the OS and > the applications are current. > > http://wiki.netbsd.org/ports/alpha/ > > NetBSD/alpha 7.0 sure is worth trying. > another good candidate for Alpha is OpenVMS hobbyist, or well... linux... sorry guys... had to say it. I remember those good old Alpha/FreeBSD days well. > > -- > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Mar 16 15:21:35 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DD52AD2B84 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 15:21:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ggroover@contactmaxima.com) Received: from mail-pf0-x233.google.com (mail-pf0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2C538FA for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 15:21:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ggroover@contactmaxima.com) Received: by mail-pf0-x233.google.com with SMTP id 124so79216454pfg.0 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 08:21:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=contactmaxima-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=to:subject:from:message-id:disposition-notification-to:date :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yVTUKIY5I5j5Nf0O3lT1rPWYx9vKitSpH3PecfvDwpw=; b=Xa9JkOs3oH+rUZNgTjVk8sw2qILAAdWo/abwtUwh+3hQSSLYelvb8ZVW2rbl8JVjWZ tUqh9nkc3+PG0ic2ccJ0r1RlIBwfiUlkCa1b7MbBAEAZMblAA6IsdZLY7mF474Epao91 +67lR4uKdq8bDTG0DgD4XKT6ZIgoVU9UwktBRtv3E6baf8clR/kYEr3vWSeTNCnUdArt p2qIU01ocp4gmcDMsrthnnp0G7Hq31adwWGz0bTcV/SiccUtpAH2eUMhq86SKut74nVf AD2PLtVU970+l8pWhTA6MH6ZTy46MDGv5ZgZxlwt+v74JtAfwbtLlyfiIvaz5et4jPGN Etkg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:to:subject:from:message-id :disposition-notification-to:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=yVTUKIY5I5j5Nf0O3lT1rPWYx9vKitSpH3PecfvDwpw=; b=ZH/O8V9W1oEXTw65GG6K27dC9o8pslcgHCWpwwvR/pFj9FLbfgzE4TrUzv8MNsh8WZ MMGhKH6AEfgrtgiOTw0xDI6qbR5H2mO1X8iib2agqVnAUQ3cgbUnGE5jZWXspuItx46u /7Bu1tPNzkBiyVW6cOUrVkHmM1Pg5wCb9U471bfJzHajEIiUkEBzexHddeI7TLjw2OmK +bY8lcaWvU0h16m+8Fu0dTxOMFIzJkO5dNP8ntHkQVu8plkugHVPqFJdtByCxAEU9dX5 T+Pwn3v+mNY+Bbb0/cD0lqRYk5GDQmzEhatxPhDUq8bEJyxovrRkqg5956OIXVRDXG34 EQqQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJ1gEcKhnxeq+RAEApsRNg492PILut9zlDr3/KZbOhYBi7hVYkVWv/MVkO5U4OAyA== X-Received: by 10.66.90.199 with SMTP id by7mr6777621pab.113.1458141694594; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 08:21:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([103.6.157.159]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h19sm6489391pfh.43.2016.03.16.08.21.32 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 16 Mar 2016 08:21:33 -0700 (PDT) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Salesforce Users List From: Gary Groover Message-ID: <56E977EB.1060701@contactmaxima.com> Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:12:43 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 160315-1, 03/15/2016), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 15:21:35 -0000 Hi, Would you be interested in acquiring an Email list of "Salesforce Users List" from USA? We have data for Nortal Users List, Business Intelligence, Collaboration, CRM/Marketing Automation, Data Management, Data Storage, Database, Enterprise Application, Hardware/OS/Systems Enviorment, ITSM, Networking, Programming Tools, Security, Servers, Telecommunication, Virtualization, and many more.. Each Record in the List includes: Company, Name, First Name, Last Name, Title, HQ Phone, Direct No, Email, Address1, Address2, City, State, Zip, Country, Industry, Revenue, Employees, IT Budget, IT Employees, Website, Technology, Company HQ Address1, Company HQ Address2, Company HQ City, Company HQ State, Company HQ Zip, Company HQ Country and LinkedIn link. Please let me know your thoughts towards procuring the "Salesforce Users List" . Please brief us on the type of emails you wish to target. Thanks & Regards Gary Groover Research Analyst --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Mar 16 15:44:13 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0E1FAD3507 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 15:44:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A17A5B73 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 15:44:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u2GFi7cY011701 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 16 Mar 2016 09:44:07 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id u2GFi7K7011694; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 09:44:07 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 09:44:07 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Doug Hardie cc: FreeBSD Questions , Polytropon Subject: Re: Upcoming Releases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20160305181742.9c3abe96.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 16 Mar 2016 09:44:07 -0600 (MDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 15:44:13 -0000 On Tue, 15 Mar 2016, Doug Hardie wrote: > >> On 15 March 2016, at 21:11, Warren Block wrote: >> >> On Wed, 9 Mar 2016, Doug Hardie wrote: >> >>> I recently saw a comment in one of the maillists that 11.0 was likely to have the new packetized base feature. That tells me that 11.0 is most likely to be dicey to work with. I am reminded when the new pkg system came out and the supporting servers were compromised. >> >> To the best of my knowledge, there was no relation between pkg and any compromises. > > There was a period where the regular pkg servers were not available because they had to be rebuilt. I don't recall the dates. It was not pkg_ng, but the first major revision to pkg after that. Sure. But many systems were rebuilt at that time, it was a concern over security in general, not pkg specifically. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Mar 16 16:16:07 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AB19AD3FAC for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 16:16:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01C60BF4 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 16:16:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-32-133.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.32.133]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECFB6278A8; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:16:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id u2GGG170002739; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:16:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:16:01 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Warren Block Cc: Doug Hardie , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Upcoming Releases Message-Id: <20160316171601.7109301a.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20160305181742.9c3abe96.freebsd@edvax.de> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 16:16:07 -0000 On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 09:44:07 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block wrote: > On Tue, 15 Mar 2016, Doug Hardie wrote: > > > > >> On 15 March 2016, at 21:11, Warren Block wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, 9 Mar 2016, Doug Hardie wrote: > >> > >>> I recently saw a comment in one of the maillists that 11.0 was likely to have the new packetized base feature. That tells me that 11.0 is most likely to be dicey to work with. I am reminded when the new pkg system came out and the supporting servers were compromised. > >> > >> To the best of my knowledge, there was no relation between pkg and any compromises. > > > > There was a period where the regular pkg servers were not available because they had to be rebuilt. I don't recall the dates. It was not pkg_ng, but the first major revision to pkg after that. > > Sure. But many systems were rebuilt at that time, it was a concern over > security in general, not pkg specifically. If I remember correctly, this was a time of many changes. Maybe the CVS->SVN change also happened during that period... -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Mar 16 16:39:10 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6715AD267B for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 16:39:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from allan@physics.umn.edu) Received: from mail.physics.umn.edu (smtp.spa.umn.edu [128.101.220.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C65917E9 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 16:39:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from allan@physics.umn.edu) Received: from peevish.spa.umn.edu ([128.101.220.230]) by mail.physics.umn.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1agEEd-000D7G-89 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:23:47 -0500 Received: by peevish.spa.umn.edu (Postfix, from userid 5000) id 317A532A; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:23:47 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:23:47 -0500 From: Graham Allan To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best freBDS 64bit version or fork for ~2001-2002 DEC Aplha? Message-ID: <20160316162347.GH4140350@physics.umn.edu> References: <20160316120940.da515c86.freebsd@edvax.de> <20160316113721.cc9fbf4ee4f1e9d930178cdc@sohara.org> <20160316130716.c10d580e.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160316130716.c10d580e.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 16:39:11 -0000 On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 01:07:16PM +0100, Polytropon wrote: > On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:37:21 +0000, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > > NetBSD may be a better option. > > Yes, NetBSD support is probably much better - both the OS and > the applications are current. > > http://wiki.netbsd.org/ports/alpha/ > > NetBSD/alpha 7.0 sure is worth trying. OpenBSD also still supports alpha, as far as I can tell. http://www.openbsd.org/alpha.html Graham From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Mar 16 16:57:05 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE9A4AD2E91 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 16:57:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pierre-yves.peneau@lirmm.fr) Received: from kirkenes.lirmm.fr (kirkenes.lirmm.fr [193.49.104.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6760118C1 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 16:57:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pierre-yves.peneau@lirmm.fr) Received: from [0.0.0.0] (li239-8.members.linode.com [173.255.229.8]) by kirkenes.lirmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7534EA5096 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:56:57 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: CURRENT does not compile on i386 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <56E2E06D.9060003@lirmm.fr> <20160311170731.a00a652c.freebsd@edvax.de> <56E2F181.1070600@lirmm.fr> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Pierre-Yves_P=c3=a9neau?= Message-ID: <56E99053.4030102@lirmm.fr> Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:56:51 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5QMCCLTTUwUK3K3vb12KXWcDffsDjMVhp" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 16:57:05 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --5QMCCLTTUwUK3K3vb12KXWcDffsDjMVhp Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="o2X7qdrBe4jUmvA6KmKXRFxMMTHb1MqP5" From: =?UTF-8?Q?Pierre-Yves_P=c3=a9neau?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <56E99053.4030102@lirmm.fr> Subject: Re: CURRENT does not compile on i386 References: <56E2E06D.9060003@lirmm.fr> <20160311170731.a00a652c.freebsd@edvax.de> <56E2F181.1070600@lirmm.fr> In-Reply-To: --o2X7qdrBe4jUmvA6KmKXRFxMMTHb1MqP5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11/03/2016 20:14, Michael Powell wrote: > Pierre-Yves P=C3=A9neau wrote: >=20 >> Oups ! Thank you for correcting me. I have fixed the command but ther= e >> is the same error. >> >> Yes I know that GENERIC is the default value, this compilation is just= a >> test for my machine. This is an "old" computer and I would like to kno= w >> how much time is needed to compile the FreeBSD kernel. >> > [snip] Please don't top post, it ruins the flow. Thanks, I always forget this part of the rule. > Make buildworld is what takes the most time. Most middle of the road mo= dern=20 > machines take something like around an hour and a half to build world. = > Kernel build takes around ten to fifteen minutes. On higher end hardwar= e=20 > these times can be quite a bit less. >=20 > On really old enough hardware it can take much, much longer than this. >=20 > If you are not a kernel-hacking developer might I respectfully suggest = > beginning with RELEASE and NOT -CURRENT? >=20 > -Mike >=20 OK I'll try with RELEASE. Thank you Mike. --=20 +-------------------------------------------------------------+ | Pierre-Yves P=C3=A9neau - PhD student | first.last at lirmm.fr | | LIRMM / CNRS - SYSMIC team | + 33 4 67 41 85 85 | | Building 4 Office H2.2 | http://walafc0.org | +-------------------------------------------------------------+ --o2X7qdrBe4jUmvA6KmKXRFxMMTHb1MqP5-- --5QMCCLTTUwUK3K3vb12KXWcDffsDjMVhp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJW6ZBWAAoJEPy7VC2L9m/AAwQQAKHq36xDa1dQtEPyEw/BA2ZT Rchm2hZNBKgWIzQrlDOadpq94doCHBRvQhFVPzUANV56Sd3Q4L2UpNvhBC2u4So7 dCVo+IobiTwf7ToGyogfEjhRR5+y4SbK4XhY1m6YOGBc/h5OFvwvgO5tOyEw6ayn imtvezTATCRzqdcVujK12QqeNdmtsilq0zOm60INiF/GBB0gIQG//+9gCXnAep70 tOiNFIuEOGhrj2OrA9YDm6kbG9D6tBASFbJdiqfxKcSi/gsioDXmt8VU9ji6NYpM uA91m6Cyy0UXqTbFVlfU3IU8QX3BYLUt/FSa1DuZupoJcr38YQl+mqfPe1E5nD9l Dczx9kZyLac2rKiuUalqtLbnJyJY9U9ysJaNOirWQTqPWBfy1kSOJcR/dV7g5I4G mXe+eX0QhBmFL2K+rSXCnyGMRqr9iLc+fERmRcBhiMjpxpikhp3HJbME3SsE15cp tG6F8+8ps2toZhabj5CI6W1IQbrOOwnGvnugmhl+NYRPTmOLoLBMQNS4psxtB7Qb Bye8Bsw+fqAhmlwo4WhyS8DwZNPJisBrktr6wsHjfr/IIn8fGCcd760K/7HYRzzA sgEfa3ykk0yVBZPjlPpxfJ4lTmFZD5/paSvMMVImEGxtzpWi3/iQp+ogRMRXF3Nt Bdmq206rzFiCZvFo0Ym2 =hERd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5QMCCLTTUwUK3K3vb12KXWcDffsDjMVhp-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Mar 16 17:18:54 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA228AD3696 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:18:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.117.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 553347B4 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:18:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from zero-gravitas.local (unknown [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:2ef0:eeff:fe24:fa38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4E1508B32 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:18:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/4E1508B32; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral Subject: Re: Upcoming Releases To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20160305181742.9c3abe96.freebsd@edvax.de> <20160316171601.7109301a.freebsd@edvax.de> From: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <56E99571.3050305@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:18:41 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160316171601.7109301a.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GnvnLk0Vla2p40lWrnk7e5rpHhAhg4sdD" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.2 required=5.0 tests=RDNS_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:18:54 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --GnvnLk0Vla2p40lWrnk7e5rpHhAhg4sdD Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="FMQME1BeTDtJJGGOxWNlRbCArMhS8intP" From: Matthew Seaman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <56E99571.3050305@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Upcoming Releases References: <20160305181742.9c3abe96.freebsd@edvax.de> <20160316171601.7109301a.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20160316171601.7109301a.freebsd@edvax.de> --FMQME1BeTDtJJGGOxWNlRbCArMhS8intP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2016/03/16 16:16, Polytropon wrote: > If I remember correctly, this was a time of many changes. > Maybe the CVS->SVN change also happened during that period... No -- the CVS to SVN switch was well before this incident. That happened well before I even became a committer. There were a lot of end-user affecting changes happening around that time, but they were mostly to do with the ports shifting from the old pkg_tools over to pkg(8). That changeover needed a lot of modifications to the ports, made more complicated by our having to maintain compatibility with pkg_tools for a number of older releases. In fact, there are a number of changes that have been planned for the ports which haven't happened yet, as they've been suspended while the work to package the base system is taking the lead. Cheers, Matthew --FMQME1BeTDtJJGGOxWNlRbCArMhS8intP-- --GnvnLk0Vla2p40lWrnk7e5rpHhAhg4sdD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJW6ZV4XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxOUYxNTRFQ0JGMTEyRTUwNTQ0RTNGMzAw MDUxM0YxMEUwQTlFNEU3AAoJEABRPxDgqeTn98cP/A+zmz6g5ez7vz3Jy4Qr9XbJ +IZ/jJ/e1GVckVMVOsYu9OiOr3iIkp2sptbokFDHspE6uiddcwiIYvZD5HZbGQeH X8WS+zqWqoKi2cW9Dl+LpkW0P5mOf6KifPfIhmRIhAKiJ3SuQ6DDf7+fEHzM7aWg j/3oY1YxfeXXQEGoxcBuOo0etdJbM+uuV+ryTV0JwsR9LOL90Fx6tX4N8B6qjMHa cuOYV2kRXbizIxurAh9fLsj8R0q3qJKlaqzwaM5Iv1F4VIwGn5Cy+EpUJpClW3IE 8igX5XUDgwJxhc+tHwMO2rpuz4W6hwO3N0xFO/M2sbqWlPuAoOgK23S1iyUDmHA4 c2Be/vVyetAHFt3rPSV9xg+ijrUO75DDgX001IifnYZ6JljYbaAwRfE/3pIJcuWR GwWQwOLIFFUeeQp25IopTmOagpcvDbwea62YnQy+te4Dh/4VtmO2HqqOAziCJhio PPJrlalI7jR0u6lqEL0sYwT/K3BUZv9/3DKIO4S5ff/pZrzeJNn/D56d55QvGFr9 CVKIF9RgQAstDDi+57ZPdxsrfsOj8vunWGUzEn3bzaVvUS0W9XIfjh3ZX4DEiqur UuI0rBpt+JQojVTpEtMM4/qvOr2djFKzr4STpPHY9S+GVo74yHd1GRNlyU8mIN1E 46yEP+widYVuWmjJcqJG =T0Gm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GnvnLk0Vla2p40lWrnk7e5rpHhAhg4sdD-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Mar 16 17:35:04 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 053C7AD3B8A for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:35:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDBF9FB8 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:35:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1agFLP-0006ts-T7 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:34:52 +0100 Received: from pool-72-66-1-32.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([72.66.1.32]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:34:51 +0100 Received: from nightrecon by pool-72-66-1-32.washdc.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:34:51 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Subject: Re: CURRENT does not compile on i386 Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 13:32:43 -0400 Lines: 21 Message-ID: References: <56E2E06D.9060003@lirmm.fr> <20160311170731.a00a652c.freebsd@edvax.de> <56E2F181.1070600@lirmm.fr> <56E99053.4030102@lirmm.fr> Reply-To: nightrecon@hotmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-72-66-1-32.washdc.fios.verizon.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:35:04 -0000 Pierre-Yves PĂ©neau wrote: [snip] >> >> If you are not a kernel-hacking developer might I respectfully suggest >> beginning with RELEASE and NOT -CURRENT? > > OK I'll try with RELEASE. Thank you Mike. > I believe the build may have been fixed since you experienced this. You may be able to refresh your source code and the trouble has passed. This is the so-called "bleeding edge", so to speak. The -CURRENT branch is where the developers 'play' with brand new code. It is never guaranteed to always build or even work at all. They will break things and they will fix things; it is an up and down roller coaster ride. Cordialement, -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Mar 16 17:43:22 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C773AD3E6D for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:43:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pierre-yves.peneau@lirmm.fr) Received: from kirkenes.lirmm.fr (kirkenes.lirmm.fr [193.49.104.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA7B5173A for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:43:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pierre-yves.peneau@lirmm.fr) Received: from [0.0.0.0] (tor-exit7-readme.dfri.se [171.25.193.131]) by kirkenes.lirmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B14BAA508E for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:43:19 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: CURRENT does not compile on i386 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <56E2E06D.9060003@lirmm.fr> <20160311170731.a00a652c.freebsd@edvax.de> <56E2F181.1070600@lirmm.fr> <56E99053.4030102@lirmm.fr> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Pierre-Yves_P=c3=a9neau?= Message-ID: <56E99B2F.1060306@lirmm.fr> Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:43:11 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DunPD10ljqiDK2A4xpQ4pAboGxHvQDov5" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:43:22 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --DunPD10ljqiDK2A4xpQ4pAboGxHvQDov5 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="lpoIg8HNcQ6gMUB9hJ3UPa2r3TMFDdXUU" From: =?UTF-8?Q?Pierre-Yves_P=c3=a9neau?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <56E99B2F.1060306@lirmm.fr> Subject: Re: CURRENT does not compile on i386 References: <56E2E06D.9060003@lirmm.fr> <20160311170731.a00a652c.freebsd@edvax.de> <56E2F181.1070600@lirmm.fr> <56E99053.4030102@lirmm.fr> In-Reply-To: --lpoIg8HNcQ6gMUB9hJ3UPa2r3TMFDdXUU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 16/03/2016 18:32, Michael Powell wrote: > Pierre-Yves P=C3=A9neau wrote: > [snip] >>> >>> If you are not a kernel-hacking developer might I respectfully sugges= t >>> beginning with RELEASE and NOT -CURRENT? >> >> OK I'll try with RELEASE. Thank you Mike. >> >=20 > I believe the build may have been fixed since you experienced this. You= may=20 > be able to refresh your source code and the trouble has passed. This i= s the=20 > so-called "bleeding edge", so to speak. >=20 > The -CURRENT branch is where the developers 'play' with brand new code.= It=20 > is never guaranteed to always build or even work at all. They will brea= k=20 > things and they will fix things; it is an up and down roller coaster ri= de.=20 >=20 > Cordialement, >=20 > -Mike >=20 I tried just before answering and the build failed again. --=20 +-------------------------------------------------------------+ | Pierre-Yves P=C3=A9neau - PhD student | first.last at lirmm.fr | | LIRMM / CNRS - SYSMIC team | + 33 4 67 41 85 85 | | Building 4 Office H2.2 | http://walafc0.org | +-------------------------------------------------------------+ --lpoIg8HNcQ6gMUB9hJ3UPa2r3TMFDdXUU-- --DunPD10ljqiDK2A4xpQ4pAboGxHvQDov5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJW6ZsyAAoJEPy7VC2L9m/ARi4P/igJIAtmplgPSpRebHacBjJM D+PI4QxWEGRo4vLrFB2Y1N7cWZbuT0I+v/3eXAub1Dywt2k+7Bn8PxRURnkMZUDj Tv2ahfWNpH5hXmiXQJOJb7dAMFPzNXTCr7f60bL3w8rz8LeZbyR0uXF6VCaJmwgc FpM64uDCJjVJov5SKeAFpqH62YiJ/9j/oiLyP9G3n99eIHCWU8o6f5Kz86ThiKhD a+iB6c7AYtXZ2dYa5r16dJsPXRUw0wiUBecbyykrY4y8OFRnZFxEe0yRIJ2kvCeV HMNoMKPBRdhMydMs359ycX0bH9oI7Y0iAOMyoq7DOebYAkalxJ60gwGQ3AR89CkX BHv2suofulG8NqRIlNQuIRJgH4tgebrh2JNe0naTyJ/w7XjqQ/U+qIHmd7ePpIEt 1/DCkb/acXgydn2jdCyqWuYARzynlCq1w5zCcqIFdfm8fbr3Vht7EwnvYALnQVy+ zlDWumhnXG3WirDYyfsApvpNOUCTTwb6ipRc/5JCiFjXorrrqOcD3Fy6oF/DjI8N GU2ZcEp/wHiXIajbwCDEFVRUNwnhl2UV1MsCyiI/I9l0PU+Y/fc0TJhWKJvo8f+g fO0p4BP3jGiELY45qECYG2VbIrvqo/RBTT8uP0C8xKljft7e9mcOm9NRodH4h66L M71zttQiou+l/+O2Pz+B =hrtd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DunPD10ljqiDK2A4xpQ4pAboGxHvQDov5-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Mar 16 18:12:24 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25487AD29E6; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:12:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from max@stucchi.ch) Received: from mailout.glevia.com (box3.par.glevia.com [188.165.228.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEED87DA; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:12:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from max@stucchi.ch) Received: from MassimianosMini.fritz.box (unknown [80.100.200.84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mailout.glevia.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EA3E38A75AE; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:08:53 +0000 (UTC) Reply-To: max@stucchi.ch To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Massimiliano Stucchi Subject: New on GUFI Blog: ELK on FreeBSD Tutorial - Third part Message-ID: <56E9A202.5030301@stucchi.ch> Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 19:12:18 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cP3Nlfnwh1m1MTBjwGm0J24fdvQxvnOOt" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:12:24 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --cP3Nlfnwh1m1MTBjwGm0J24fdvQxvnOOt Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8QEV79FNn83oRBELo7d9cGJFMxrDM8x6H" From: Massimiliano Stucchi Reply-To: max@stucchi.ch To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <56E9A202.5030301@stucchi.ch> Subject: New on GUFI Blog: ELK on FreeBSD Tutorial - Third part --8QEV79FNn83oRBELo7d9cGJFMxrDM8x6H Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [Testo in Italiano a seguito di quello in inglese] Hi FreeBSD Users, we're pleased to announce that we have published the third part of the "ELK stack tutorial" on our Blog. This is the third part of a three-piece tutorial on ElasticSearch, Logstash and Kibana based on FreeB= SD. You can find it at the following URL: https://blog.gufi.org/2016/03/16/elk-stack-elasticsearch-logstash-and-kib= ana-on-freebsd-part-3/ This article is provided by GUFI, Gruppo Utenti FreeBSD Italia GUFI is the main Italian Users Group dedicated to the FreeBSD Operating system, consisting of a series of mailing lists (which can be found at https://lists.gufi.org), a Facebook group (https://www.facebook.com/groups/FreeBSDItalia/), and a twitter account (@freebsd_it) The GUFI Blog is a collection of contributions from staff members and normal users from the Italian community. Everybody is encouraged to contribute and discuss about the contents, which are themselves distributed under the BSD license. For any question, suggestion or request, feel free to send an e-mail to staff@gufi.org. Have a nice read! ------- Gentili utenti di FreeBSD, siamo lieti di annunciarvi che abbiamo pubblicato la seconda parte di "ELK Stack Tutorial" sul nostro blog. Questa e' la terza di una serie di tre parti su ElasticSearch, Logstash e Kibana su FreeBSD. L'articolo e' in inglese, e lo trovate al seguente URL: https://blog.gufi.org/2016/03/16/elk-stack-elasticsearch-logstash-and-kib= ana-on-freebsd-part-3/ Questo articolo e' stato prodotto da GUFI, Gruppo Utenti FreeBSD Italia. GUFI e' il principale gruppo utenti italiano dedicato al sistema operativo FreeBSD, e comprende una serie di mailing lists (che potete trovare all'indirizzo https://lists.gufi.org), un gruppo Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/groups/FreeBSDItalia/), ed un account twitter (@freebsd_it). Il GUFI Blog e' una collezione di contributi da parte dei membri dello staff e normali utenti della comunita' FreeBSD Italiana. Chiunque e' incoraggiato a contribuire e discutere riguardo i contenuti, che sono loro stessi distribuiti con licenza BSD. Per ogni domanda, consiglio o richiesta, potete scrivere una e-mail a staff@gufi.org. Buona lettura! --=20 Massimiliano Stucchi MS16801-RIPE --8QEV79FNn83oRBELo7d9cGJFMxrDM8x6H-- --cP3Nlfnwh1m1MTBjwGm0J24fdvQxvnOOt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJW6aICAAoJEM8nRl51QbrlVo0H+wWb5W/535J+W1BaxALM6LUD /luyEma1eJ8A5lJkTZStS6Tl1hVJfeqipnn0YO6w/WgsRbbYofWRLSCSmn7JpnvR ZeAmRqvvsC1yWVrInrQD0p9ZwjGUQFQhg9G3bkUMKhXzVIYInFwKwCfn6qQJYU8V zy7IxtDpDP6DJYhHBfke9cPzTAJoBB6hhtSVOjVzl85PHhZRH6JL45fWwZxFcvu/ vTFKAlOEUsPEDsnhZjElfvhdsbonO9hOnha8Qj+CtuQxbBd5n5jKxPxd+wnn8SDx Ua+euJp6y9SgzMDYtwRh8eJowvfTfDP2K54/C/Pm2jFjPEh9RnE4ITSegiy77WE= =Z43I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cP3Nlfnwh1m1MTBjwGm0J24fdvQxvnOOt-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Mar 16 21:42:37 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4924AD2C77 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 21:42:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DFE41374 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 21:42:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1agJD7-00023I-Ae for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 22:42:33 +0100 Received: from 65.75.36.70 ([65.75.36.70]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 22:42:33 +0100 Received: from gyliamos by 65.75.36.70 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 22:42:33 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Will Parsons Subject: Trouble recovering after re-installing CUPS Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 21:42:21 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 14 Message-ID: Reply-To: gyliamos@gmail.com X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.75.36.70 User-Agent: slrn/1.0.2 (FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 21:42:37 -0000 I re-installing cups (after deleting cups-base, cups-client, cups-image, and cups-pstoraster), but have lost hplip. An attempt to re-install it fails with: ===> Registering installation for hplip-3.16.2 pkg-static: Unable to access file /usr/ports/print/hplip/work/stage/usr/local/etc/cups/pstotiff.convs: No such file or directory pkg-static: Unable to access file /usr/ports/print/hplip/work/stage/usr/local/etc/cups/pstotiff.types: No such file or directory *** [fake-pkg] Error code 74 % uname -a FreeBSD anukis.local 9.3-RELEASE-p21 FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p21 #0: Tue Jul 28 08:57:41 UTC 2015 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 How can I proceed to resolve this? From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Mar 17 00:10:10 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E28AD22E6 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:10:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Received: from lb2-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net (lb2-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net [194.109.24.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "*.xs4all.nl", Issuer "GlobalSign Domain Validation CA - SHA256 - G2" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0051582E for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:10:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Received: from samurai.lan ([83.160.85.125]) by smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net with ESMTP id Wo8v1s00Z2iF10301o8x5J; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 01:08:57 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by samurai.lan (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA5BDFE93; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 01:08:54 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 01:08:53 +0100 (CET) From: Marco Beishuizen X-X-Sender: marco@localhost Reply-To: Marco Beishuizen To: Chris Hope cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Best freBDS 64bit version or fork for ~2001-2002 DEC Aplha? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (NEB 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:10:10 -0000 On Wed, 16 Mar 2016, the wise Chris Hope wrote: > What is the latest kernel 64bit either internal project or recommended > fork that supports it (with KDE/Gnome 1 or similar UI). I recently revived my DEC PWS600au here at home (from 1997). It ran FreeBSD when I got it some 12 years ago but now I've installed NetBSD on it. FreeBSD on alpha is tier 2 now. I haven't tried X on it yet though. Marco -- "What do you give a man who has everything?" the pretty teenager asked her mother. "Encouragement, dear," she replied. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Mar 17 03:14:43 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C05FAAD3F33 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 03:14:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gfh@swampdog.co.uk) Received: from mx1.solardns.com (mx1.solardns.com [109.73.127.119]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 836FC1068 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 03:14:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gfh@swampdog.co.uk) Received: from titan.solardns.com ([213.129.84.167]) by mx1.solardns.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1agONM-0007us-J5 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 03:13:30 +0000 Received: from [81.109.74.232] (port=37048 helo=sd.swampdog) by titan.solardns.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.86_1) (envelope-from ) id 1agONM-003rzK-53 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 03:13:28 +0000 From: Guy Harrison To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dhcpd, iscsi and a raspberry pi Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 03:13:19 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 References: <201603151632.14124.gfh@swampdog.co.uk> <201603152316.33023.gfh@swampdog.co.uk> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201603170313.19785.gfh@swampdog.co.uk> X-AuthUser: swampdog X-Filter-ID: s0sct1PQhAABKnZB5plbIY0Wf8WMyPuXHU+XUfPiEwcD4Rd/h6nhaQ7ZruH71MWktHFHLxtsn9wx dKyKAPnphQR4+0K7G1KvSa5ZSxPOujd2vxpKI0nPnfcNMKzMVl0ZgZ/Tw6DoY/8c2+5B5/2kISDH pDYvAGz9SvCxHRSxuIZ7BYTbOVvf2gutSKwjkrz64tmbePOZicDE2cTpTraHqS3breeaRmS0N1SH eKK+UkYtlPa/1nUwnw/hoHgr71b/vCrJPmnnTHzVkpybMK7ZTSEhnb66958pLGInGdL26Gs7lfzu /tPONwh9XNOtDyHaCxAmFTLzJB9zUoZ7ZW57niXMjKy9q3SRj7Q2gxGEk++TEtSxjwHNYb/2LiS7 Aj0AWhTXYlwXE+/uHic0AZ4kmrFUBlt3lbnvUeKEYqy8QDYdQk7XGXTfKeB6w9EPnG9cwaEh4MHC ziS+7iGBWJgglPOW6bvL9DC431WlF1LxckxUtEzMQ8hG9MbEN0FihoziP1MA7ED7gs165rpid68f E6luiuQKW35wYye6nyYrkIlIr+mi9pmJxFJZniBtPSj46J1fhOzjF0b4LXcjJZ5lojV3tFdAoO2u Gco+Sc/igH4lkBSh9vJu6q0AAzXqBj9opKSnwxkGqROms5EUtztdTJjbPrNfgmP1oCYIL5fOtJM= X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@mx1.solardns.com X-Filter-Fingerprint: IFrWXGses7OKB5S5G8/dJdIz5bb8V0ykx8BnFBnunHBA3cTUQ1R++keuE7RDJ8Kg3RbMLUalw1oC mj99/u+Poh38tEMU4IgC4sNz49qn3HHnhRv/ZJ3kEy8bfiAr+Fb/UpndEJ0YoaLytXXo8BMTaVt0 ARHRi6XGuAluI1udprGClI6bm+u9ssQgM5AHe3Zacv4uJct5wtJvPpZ2dlBHCwDSxr3Vz+LJ/RhM 2JZ0ECN5dnq47RWft7iCyM9+PbHelB4qP9S6mTzNwoPraFy6ieiDqMHb2a0eZvGOvr7RaxKWGCKO us9nABr0Pk/4CplP X-Originating-IP: 213.129.84.167 X-SpamExperts-Domain: out.solardns.com X-SpamExperts-Username: 213.129.84.167 Authentication-Results: solardns.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=213.129.84.167@out.solardns.com X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Class: ham X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.00) X-Recommended-Action: accept X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 03:14:43 -0000 On Tuesday 15 March 2016 23:56:14 Matt Mullins wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Guy Harrison wrote: > > On Tuesday 15 March 2016 22:41:10 Lowell Gilbert wrote: > > > Lowell Gilbert writes: > > > > I thought dhcpd would use MAC address if the client didn't provide > > > > anything else. I'll check if I get a chance. > > > > > > Confirmed. My dual-boot machine has no special settings in the > > > server's dhcp.conf, and gets the same address regardless of which OS > > > it's using. It even offers a different hostname on each OS. > > > > Cheers. It's beginning to look like it's the lack of client information > > from the first (initrd *.53) dhcp request that may be the cause. If > > that's the case then I can rule out.. > > > > ..and go figure out what how.. > > > > uid "\001\270'\353\0172d"; > > uid is the cause. DUID was added to dhcpv4 in RFC 4361, and a dhcpd > that understands the option will treat different DUIDs as separate > devices even if they have the same MAC address. > > You might want to remove "send dhcp-client-identifier = hardware;" > from your /etc/dhcp/dhclient.conf (or equivalent) on your Raspberry > Pi. The plot thickens. It would appear that option is commented out and even when I uncomment it, whatever I value I assign it, is ignored. Seems I'm now off looking for something which is overriding it elsewhere. Cheers for the help. Guy From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Mar 17 06:14:14 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57B22AD3803 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 06:14:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x22c.google.com (mail-wm0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB81BEFE for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 06:14:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id l68so10917222wml.0 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 23:14:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=GHXHceivORNEng2X7t9Ap90/7ALwJhYqlwwOsTfxhDc=; b=lvw4qafcm2h4/UpEc6lcB3S7zCXVLz7YTIF30MKh2VnX4xE3goXbIbOV0xpUPhrt1C jfu04n+YuzM96GL663qfm4VwzYDnwyRorOaauUCze9+m4O+AK4CD/6R4v/6qtBpJO69R cRU0fqwfmjjqiaPVeOhJcQLHwKTeJe+svkLki7s2MOR64Mlvxs5w8py0SbKkwGlsH8Oh BqnkBjN8pyECITPl/sq2XRl0Nxxe0eeuilcTYOGBJo/JDXNg+s8msxIoJvgNXE17X4WA 5geL5tJTJsiZ90Y8o1v+dwaf+++BtXQSsgRm9k1snDdHamk7mj2Xg5YLrfeBKc8JbK4k Zxsw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=GHXHceivORNEng2X7t9Ap90/7ALwJhYqlwwOsTfxhDc=; b=fnSYeRvTpRlV0tjpEQVY+CRHAkVwFPF0X3O5NGuSrtScg428mYxMUg+VCiez067JRr 3MD3aCOX4QnNobDQeVj3J8Ozj6u34/a7WLreUdsVGyXBkLr+LeaKGEysBi/PLMfCPmQa uC9rwGQwIlGZdtTGeiNj0XTxWEqZJzZ4udlTHJtmvsEXzsqa4X5qsqLaefph0GeHAvTB 4WQ6ug9azM3oDNBhVTAZ5C+KOpSJBZS+Pa1MHudjDGjRYeWPRq1UJAEvQAXW/UpnfDWJ uieB9NrAzFNdQvZMBsv/RFmZviee7Bjv7xp0ELa8MNkXSFNXl3CRelEe50kMGYn8FIPv WRRg== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJQSwbjvDd/M/QdvB+SpsaYggUCF1x/65PfmWfCBsIA3A5b0Qm7SMNYV7SHy8c0y1BGE3OElYlCy+hxbA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.172.3 with SMTP id ay3mr7686898wjc.155.1458195252212; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 23:14:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.23.104 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 23:14:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160315173122.GB92613@slackbox.erewhon.home> References: <20160315173122.GB92613@slackbox.erewhon.home> Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 07:14:12 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Getting wireless network up and running From: Ben Woods To: Carmel , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 06:14:14 -0000 > > > > > > I cannot seem to get my wireless network up and running. > > > > > > > > > > /boot/loader.conf > > > > > if_bwn_load=3D"YES" # Broadcom BCM43xx IEEE 802.11 wireless NICs > > You also need to load the firmware using the ports/net/bwn-firmware-kmod > port > *before* calling ifconfig. See the manual page bwn(4). (Type =E2=80=98man= 4 bwn=E2=80=99 > in a > terminal or on the console to view the manual page.) > Just to ensure we are clear, installing the firmware and loading the kernel module are 2 separate steps. 1. Install the package bwn-firmware-kmod, or install it from ports (net/bwn-firmware-kmod). 2. Load the firmware module into the kernel. # kldload bwn_v4_ucode To ensure this is loaded during next book, add the following line to /boot/loader.conf: bwn_v4_ucode_load=3D"YES" You should be able to see that the kernel module has loaded using the kldstat command. Once you have done this, and have the correct /etc/rc.conf and /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf configuration as previously recommended, it should work. Note that if it doesn't work, you could try instead loading the low power kernel module instead of the one above: # kldunload bwn_v4_ucode # kldload bwn_v4_lp_ucode To use the LP module after the next reboot, change the line in /boot/loader.conf to: bwn_v4_lp_ucode_load=3D"YES" Good luck, Ben --=20 -- From: Benjamin Woods woodsb02@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Mar 17 08:36:39 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85F1BAD4DBB for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 08:36:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6722@twc.com) Received: from dnvrco-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (dnvrco-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.73.228]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F46E2D5 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 08:36:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6722@twc.com) Received: from [96.28.178.143] ([96.28.178.143:63323] helo=localhost) by dnvrco-oedge02 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.5.0.35861 r(Momo-dev:tip)) with ESMTP id 01/72-21263-F8C6AE65; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 08:36:32 +0000 Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 08:35:44 +0000 Message-ID: <01.72.21263.F8C6AE65@dnvrco-oedge02> From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best freBDS 64bit version or fork for ~2001-2002 DEC Aplha? References: X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.64.130:25 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=Nu1fcqtJ c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=RKm8ZHSrUWUxlfG+7GhaOw==:117 a=RKm8ZHSrUWUxlfG+7GhaOw==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=k8CH0dEdL1aFSAoaFqoA:9 a=9_0mjcbniQEA:10 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 08:36:39 -0000 > I recently revived my DEC PWS600au here at home (from 1997). It ran FreeBSD > when I got it some 12 years ago but now I've installed NetBSD on it. FreeBSD > on alpha is tier 2 now. I haven't tried X on it yet though. > Marco No longer tier 2, FreeBSD on Alpha is long discontinued, as of v7. So you are better off with NetBSD, and pkgsrc is still supported. Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Mar 17 09:25:15 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7B62AD1399 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 09:25:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: from mailrelay107.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay107.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.20.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "relay.skynet.be", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B59B380 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 09:25:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2CIAgA6d+pW/xtr8lFeg0aBMg+3eoIPAQ2Bb4YNAoEzORQBAQEBAQEBZCeEQgEBBDocHgUQCxgJJQ8qHhmIK8BQAQEBAQEFAQEBARyKYoUIg24Fl1KNd26OIY8CHgEBQoNmOy6KYwEBAQ Received: from 27.107-242-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([81.242.107.27]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 17 Mar 2016 10:25:12 +0100 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u2H9PCsT027408; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 10:25:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 10:25:11 +0100 From: Tijl Coosemans To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: gyliamos@gmail.com Subject: Re: Trouble recovering after re-installing CUPS Message-ID: <20160317102511.035de93e@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 09:25:16 -0000 On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 21:42:21 +0000 (UTC) Will Parsons wrote: > I re-installing cups (after deleting cups-base, cups-client, > cups-image, and cups-pstoraster), but have lost hplip. An attempt to > re-install it fails with: > > ===> Registering installation for hplip-3.16.2 > pkg-static: Unable to access file /usr/ports/print/hplip/work/stage/usr/local/etc/cups/pstotiff.convs: No such file or directory > pkg-static: Unable to access file /usr/ports/print/hplip/work/stage/usr/local/etc/cups/pstotiff.types: No such file or directory > *** [fake-pkg] Error code 74 > > % uname -a > FreeBSD anukis.local 9.3-RELEASE-p21 FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p21 #0: Tue Jul 28 08:57:41 UTC 2015 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 > > > How can I proceed to resolve this? Thanks for the report. I've committed a fix in r411264. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Mar 17 14:23:51 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A152AD4A8F for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:23:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 0101015384f60095-5728208c-abdb-40eb-b5fd-6a807760473b-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com) Received: from a27-119.smtp-out.us-west-2.amazonses.com (a27-119.smtp-out.us-west-2.amazonses.com [54.240.27.119]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A182AB8 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:23:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 0101015384f60095-5728208c-abdb-40eb-b5fd-6a807760473b-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=t2unefk7p6fvdqjs7ozpevmztf55zqby; d=amazonbusiness.com; t=1458224627; h=Message-ID:Date:Subject:From:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:List-Unsubscribe; bh=xKuf4c0MLKFSo5SGEtipf+VfUUP9ClqdL74nXMRCiBM=; b=jPDL95NoH6C65PE8qgV6i29uQRDUWeXkuaqM2cy4HkYU24bICqmXcR8mdrw6HiD+ ZGwbNIVT/eZjQ7gCF3YmwU7eP6ikVEkF/tKNsC704urGtOH5DeUoozrOtTMDWTrBQ11 PQd7rapjAyVVnKpLsbkGtj9zWRrt0HgMuykp5OVY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=gdwg2y3kokkkj5a55z2ilkup5wp5hhxx; d=amazonses.com; t=1458224627; h=Message-ID:Date:Subject:From:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:List-Unsubscribe:Feedback-ID; bh=xKuf4c0MLKFSo5SGEtipf+VfUUP9ClqdL74nXMRCiBM=; b=EKOagqDWeWrtoc5TI0vYKCY5kUzVGKZBF6w9Fh/TO96+PKP7puDCdi5h9sOEtRQf YNYt7mOou6RCfzWTfuxhGDQEw73rAc4UB+rFhRTxQ4ufLwfzsHn7glWwOjblzK6XUH5 gdX3wL2CZH3Y6Xjk5/YIpVlqSD8kDlDCE5cxK8co= Message-ID: <0101015384f60095-5728208c-abdb-40eb-b5fd-6a807760473b-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:23:47 +0000 Subject: Sign Up for a Free Amazon Business Account with Tax Exemption From: Amazon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Pardot-Route: 49:54552:282875000 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@pd25.com X-SES-Outgoing: 2016.03.17-54.240.27.119 Feedback-ID: 1.us-west-2.DslCQSzKRwSQ0bYxCfi+GcY39H31l7QrR+kFUIOTrc4=:AmazonSES Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:23:51 -0000 Do you shop online for work? Amazon Business makes it easy to get the = products you need, support multiple users under a single account, and manage tax-exempt purchasing for your organization. Business Pricing Save more with exclusive bus= iness prices. Free Two-Day Shipping Unlimited free deliveries on eli= gible orders of $49 or more. Shared Accounts Add users, spending lim= its, and approval workflows. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Upgrade to a free business account http://www.= amazonbusiness.com/e/54552/ion-confirmation-ref-b2b-ep211/7hy6hr/282875000= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D = ------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---------------------------------------------------=09=09=09 We hope you found this message to be useful. However, if you'd rather no= t receive future emails of this sort from Amazon, please unsubscribe - = http://www.amazonbusiness.com/unsubscribe/u/54552/50f7ff3fa2c126589e66d5afe= 9ce81371930f63344d3f6412eb8d2da2ad678a7/282875000 - or let us know your email preferences - http://www.amazonbusiness.com/p= references/?ehash=3D50f7ff3fa2c126589e66d5afe9ce81371930f63344d3f6412eb8d2d= a2ad678a7&email_id=3D282875000 =C2=A9 2016 Amazon.com, Inc. or its aff= iliates. All rights reserved. Amazon, Amazon.com and the Amazon.com logo = are registered trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. Amazon.com, 410 Terry Avenue North, S= eattle, WA 98109-5210 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Mar 17 16:00:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90E3EAD2D56 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:00:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gandalf@shopzeus.com) Received: from shopzeus.com (shopzeus.com [87.229.70.149]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5846CBAE for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:00:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gandalf@shopzeus.com) Received: from [127.127.127.127] (localhost [127.127.127.127]) (Authenticated sender: gandalf) by shopzeus.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1CDA1889C60B for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 11:50:29 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shopzeus.com; s=shopzeus_com; t=1458229829; bh=O4JH4W574YYacXITYbm7Lv8Hkui1rdQoTB9FZTfUCS0=; h=To:From:Subject:Date:From; b=Xrf5JuBP6VUpzmsJTWZao7gih7DMchUQeYiPsSCaDLKSGvaOnIqQIAa4/QdEGk1Dv mydGEueBmYny3dXhO8prZ/zGHA1fa8HoRo2q9eJVNmpm1MQqs0bxu6K5+Low6az2jm iEhh/KB963qT6lUVwAJQL7F/LfUnN7b8rRLwae4sf7uE75oGHW8/AxjP051MWoiY+i 9UqoeDNIuLC9Qf8got/lTyUaPFv2oBs5m1BktjHseS1b07Peq1zEnSgKX3ecR/VjSU 2wqAex0iCEz3ayavIHFVHsaVcS4JZCmC6kwYMnWrezyla3DZooo77IHIT4k2KTgjUs XB2bSGwq/Uenw== To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: =?UTF-8?Q?Nagy_L=c3=a1szl=c3=b3_Zsolt?= Subject: c-icap exists without notice Message-ID: <56EAD246.7090009@shopzeus.com> Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:50:30 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:00:19 -0000 I have installed the c-icap server port and squidclamav. When I try to start it in foreground+debug mode, the following happens: # /usr/local/bin/c-icap -f /usr/local/etc/c-icap/c-icap.conf -D The acl spec all does not exists! squidclamav.c(183) squidclamav_init_service: DEBUG Going to initialize squidclamav LOG Reading configuration from /usr/local/etc/c-icap//squidclamav.conf LOG Reading directive maxsize with value 5000000 LOG Reading directive clamd_local with value /var/run/clamav/clamd.sock LOG Reading directive timeout with value 1 LOG Reading directive logredir with value 0 LOG Reading directive dnslookup with value 1 LOG Reading directive safebrowsing with value 0 Warning, alias is the same as service_name, not adding # In other words: it reads all config files. Apparently there are no errors (only LOG lines and a single WARNING). Then the program exits without any explanation and I get back the shell prompt. I think it should work as a service but it does not. If I try to start it from an rc script then the same happens: # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/c-icap start Starting c_icap. # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/c-icap status c_icap is not running. There is nothing in the system log. There seems to be no "error" except that it does not start. Without getting any error message, I find it very hard to figure this out. Environment: FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE c-icap-0.3.5_2,2 squidclamav-6.13 Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Mar 17 16:21:07 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C838BAD3739 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:21:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gandalf@shopzeus.com) Received: from shopzeus.com (shopzeus.com [87.229.70.149]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F1F4B1E for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:21:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gandalf@shopzeus.com) Received: from [127.127.127.127] (localhost [127.127.127.127]) (Authenticated sender: gandalf) by shopzeus.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9B937889C621 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 12:21:04 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shopzeus.com; s=shopzeus_com; t=1458231664; bh=wIDNTGeIF/Q1KqMmTkj6UIuRJ0ZSuyA3LoLLneotCvE=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=BxFPEUN5NUyF5jfQZSaK9VHT+GD+aNKD77vCahl2m2T5RKDVw4OUCjxFVou6mCm1Q jDctC1rg8EnMTB9ckukX/nQtZLVhnwJ2EWZRC42TI6J1Jf002Dlx7MuPHaT0GmkjpB 6kdU0zpo3FOVGCg7mv69K0/jgLqE7gSdrvcutxsN4jaHF6mQ2EqGOSd2K7I6RQCQZK gNxQL/bLMpPGoHFh1t1z67zHkTbnYA0jinYriEDSxC27m2L72TkUxXBxAvSL/l4IIf beJfatP2z6/ctwipmFUGFUkiKzzR/dXT5l630St7KRFPtU3CvfuUdeE9bjGS2bkeUb gSikEO1yC88Sw== Subject: Re: c-icap exists without notice [SOLVED] To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <56EAD246.7090009@shopzeus.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Nagy_L=c3=a1szl=c3=b3_Zsolt?= Message-ID: <56EAD972.8050403@shopzeus.com> Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 17:21:06 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56EAD246.7090009@shopzeus.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:21:07 -0000 > I have installed the c-icap server port and squidclamav. When I try to > start it in foreground+debug mode, the following happens: Starting with "c-icap -N -D -d 10" options: Setting parameter :-d=10 Searching 0x61d8d8 for default value Setting parameter :PidFile=/var/run/c-icap/c-icap.pid Searching 0x61d8e0 for default value Setting parameter :CommandsSocket=/var/run/c-icap/c-icap.ctl Searching 0x61d948 for default value Setting parameter :Timeout=300 Searching 0x61d950 for default value Setting parameter :MaxKeepAliveRequests=100 Searching 0x61d94c for default value Setting parameter :KeepAliveTimeout=600 Searching 0x61d930 for default value Setting parameter :StartServers=3 Searching 0x61d934 for default value Setting parameter :MaxServers=10 Searching 0x61d93c for default value Setting parameter :MinSpareThreads=10 Searching 0x61d940 for default value Setting parameter :MaxSpareThreads=20 Searching 0x61d938 for default value Setting parameter :ThreadsPerChild=10 Searching 0x61f7d0 for default value Setting parameter :MaxRequestsPerChild=0 Searching 0x61d8c8 for default value Setting parameter :Port=1344 Searching 0x61d8e8 for default value Setting parameter :User=c_icap Searching 0x61d8f0 for default value Setting parameter :Group=c_icap Searching 0x61d920 for default value Setting parameter :ServerAdmin=gandalf@mess.hu Searching 0x61d928 for default value Setting parameter :ServerName=gw.visznet Searching 0x61d8d0 for default value Setting parameter :TmpDir=/var/tmp Searching 0x61f610 for default value Setting parameter :MaxMemObject=131072 Searching 0x61d960 for default value Setting parameter :Pipelining=1 Searching 0x61f7e0 for default value Setting parameter :SupportBuggyClients=0 Searching 0x61d918 for default value Setting parameter :ModulesDir=/usr/local/lib/c_icap Searching 0x61d910 for default value Setting parameter :ServicesDir=/usr/local/lib/c_icap Searching 0x800a671e0 for default value Setting parameter :TemplateDir=/usr/local/share/c_icap/templates/ Searching 0x800a67130 for default value Setting parameter :TemplateDefaultLanguage=en The db file /usr/local/etc/c-icap/c-icap.magic is the same as default. Ignoring... Searching 0x61f808 for default value Setting parameter :RemoteProxyUsers=0 Searching 0x61e0c8 for default value Setting parameter :RemoteProxyUserHeader=X-Authenticated-User Searching 0x61e0d0 for default value Setting parameter :RemoteProxyUserHeaderEncoded=1 Adding to acl localhost the data 127.0.0.1/255.255.255.255 In search specs list 0x0,name localhost New ACL with name:localhost and ACL Type: src Adding to acl ALLREQUESTS the data REQMOD In search specs list 0x801c164c0,name ALLREQUESTS Checking name:ALLREQUESTS with specname localhost Adding to acl ALLREQUESTS the data RESPMOD In search specs list 0x801c164c0,name ALLREQUESTS Checking name:ALLREQUESTS with specname localhost Checking name:ALLREQUESTS with specname ALLREQUESTS Adding to acl ALLREQUESTS the data OPTIONS In search specs list 0x801c164c0,name ALLREQUESTS Checking name:ALLREQUESTS with specname localhost Checking name:ALLREQUESTS with specname ALLREQUESTS New ACL with name:ALLREQUESTS and ACL Type: type Creating new access entry as allow with specs: In search specs list 0x801c164c0,name localhost Checking name:localhost with specname localhost In search specs list 0x801c164c0,name localhost Checking name:localhost with specname localhost Adding acl spec: localhost In search specs list 0x801c164c0,name ALLREQUESTS Checking name:ALLREQUESTS with specname localhost Checking name:ALLREQUESTS with specname ALLREQUESTS In search specs list 0x801c164c0,name ALLREQUESTS Checking name:ALLREQUESTS with specname localhost Checking name:ALLREQUESTS with specname ALLREQUESTS Adding acl spec: ALLREQUESTS Creating new access entry as deny with specs: In search specs list 0x801c164c0,name all Checking name:all with specname localhost Checking name:all with specname ALLREQUESTS In search specs list 0x801c164c0,name all Checking name:all with specname localhost Checking name:all with specname ALLREQUESTS The acl spec all does not exists! Adding acl spec: all Searching 0x61e2a8 for default value Setting parameter :ServerLog=/var/log/c-icap/server.log Adding the access logfile /var/log/c-icap/access.log Loading service :echo_service path srv_echo.so Found handler C_handler for service with extension:.so Initialization of echo module...... Registering conf table:echo Registering conf table:echo_service Loading service :squidclamav path squidclamav.so Found handler C_handler for service with extension:.so squidclamav.c(183) squidclamav_init_service: DEBUG Going to initialize squidclamav squidclamav.c(708) set_istag: DEBUG setting istag to -1-squidclamav-10 Command squidclamav:cfgreload registered LOG Reading configuration from /usr/local/etc/c-icap//squidclamav.conf LOG Reading directive maxsize with value 5000000 LOG Reading directive clamd_local with value /var/run/clamav/clamd.sock LOG Reading directive timeout with value 1 LOG Reading directive logredir with value 0 LOG Reading directive dnslookup with value 1 LOG Reading directive safebrowsing with value 0 Registering conf table:squidclamav Warning, alias is the same as service_name, not adding My hostname is:gw.visznet Command relog registered c-icap server already running! Basically, it says it is already running. I have checked, and it does indeed: root@gw:/usr/local/etc/c-icap # ps axw | grep icap 24420 - Ss 0:00.01 /usr/local/bin/c-icap -f /usr/local/etc/c-icap/c-icap.conf -D 24421 - I 0:00.01 /usr/local/bin/c-icap -f /usr/local/etc/c-icap/c-icap.conf -D 24422 - I 0:00.01 /usr/local/bin/c-icap -f /usr/local/etc/c-icap/c-icap.conf -D 24423 - I 0:00.01 /usr/local/bin/c-icap -f /usr/local/etc/c-icap/c-icap.conf -D After I have tested this, suddenly the status, stop and start commands started to work! root@gw:/usr/local/etc/c-icap # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/c-icap stop Stopping c_icap. Waiting for PIDS: 24420. root@gw:/usr/local/etc/c-icap # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/c-icap stop c_icap not running? (check /var/run/c-icap/c-icap.pid). root@gw:/usr/local/etc/c-icap # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/c-icap start Starting c_icap. root@gw:/usr/local/etc/c-icap # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/c-icap status c_icap is running as pid 25081. I have no idea what happened, but the problem is gone. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Mar 17 16:37:13 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8B42AD3C67 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:37:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mandrews@aimdigitalpros.com) Received: from mail-pf0-x22f.google.com (mail-pf0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8381737F for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:37:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mandrews@aimdigitalpros.com) Received: by mail-pf0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id n5so127478056pfn.2 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 09:37:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aimdigitalpros-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=to:subject:from:message-id:disposition-notification-to:date :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RAka/nVKFPHd4GdegcTGodnPqaSeQylj9B+0WGM7m0I=; b=z9DOusASCsFuDLCmqJ23lu+KpmOeZ6zYG0Iub2JcL4vX0NgU2isVZvCpZJjbRtVvei QqAgSAk1fOswIVnl6AI2jLdrEOZn0HboN/+qV1kg7cHfrT2SYeSedxcwk3S7OOSFap+F BovgGWaKPVoOy3y+KDLfweWjK46vn6gmbEuM0UnTRHxq6ipTzVUsmFyjY/CGibMRIyv+ nN+M43gW4lxL+UXBVp5K4cLmvHSQaTl0cgZp/KuYVuo9A7r2AjocEoXtX0vD5/Y4fwTA Jowh3JVLpIZuN6UrvRJWgMpZik9XUNZno9jlD/KtBLaEzmqf6YNpAHB3ljJNlKKxTSaT I0Wg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:to:subject:from:message-id :disposition-notification-to:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=RAka/nVKFPHd4GdegcTGodnPqaSeQylj9B+0WGM7m0I=; b=k33Ya/w6Kj6WgiUjo/yRLHCEcJ88f2SfWxNlnGUmXEe0fPIhlXsYlga40n46ypaE33 1XFfG2blyEVPIUGz3nkj/LgU+xVPEr+UhbyO9RxNbEiXikyRepUh2rERMso8cQM/gHYE 6EuJiiaat5mBwu4V++MrLohn6OsqHctA/XJyQlS82zgW83xwC75mLgs3nG8HrN7rxcbM GJqTL47Fanh7QpxSPMGuqRn6iFukPXKb9mZGI6tH/u2bim8zqG2LYW9vOWHdsuYrY5Fm GmBi2RTjKQqx3/MJdfrp9FilmSAR6FhMTo080pBX6tZqbAHAjSmuoht64kdgkZ3Z+uR+ Ac7Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJu7VfOwOwrLK2rnVRvwUTGo86Rd68QQwpf5LdSOyhbVFU0/H9an3FWDpV4zQI5Tw== X-Received: by 10.98.16.12 with SMTP id y12mr4268048pfi.72.1458232632610; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 09:37:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([103.6.157.158]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r203sm14568461pfr.22.2016.03.17.09.37.10 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 17 Mar 2016 09:37:11 -0700 (PDT) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re:Beer Enthusiasts From: Mary Andrews Message-ID: <56EAD253.2060600@aimdigitalpros.com> Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 11:50:43 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 160316-1, 03/16/2016), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:37:13 -0000 Hi, I'm Mary. Would you be interested in reaching out to Beer Enthusiasts List from USA? We also have data for Wine Enthusiasts List, Alcohol Enthusiasts Email List, SPA Visitors Email List, Resort Visitors Email List, US Consumers Mailing List and many more. Each record in the list contains Contact Name (First, Middle and Last Name), Mailing Address, List type and Opt-in email address. Please let me know your thoughts towards procuring the Beer Enthusiasts List. Best Regards, Mary Andrews Research Analyst We respect your privacy, if you do not wish to receive any further emails from our end, please reply with a subject “Leave Out”. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Mar 17 22:01:30 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F01F8AD3D9E for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 22:01:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from betts@norden1.com) Received: from mail.norden1.com (162-232-17-115.lightspeed.toldoh.sbcglobal.net [162.232.17.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2250BE for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 22:01:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from betts@norden1.com) Received: from norden1.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.norden1.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8FB845CD80 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 18:01:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 192.168.1.82 (SquirrelMail authenticated user betts@norden1.com) by norden1.com with HTTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 18:01:37 -0400 Message-ID: <593e358bbc098c69df8f36449629b9cc.squirrel@norden1.com> Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 18:01:37 -0400 Subject: Error on poweredge 1950 server From: betts@norden1.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.23 [SVN] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 22:01:31 -0000 Installed new drives on Dell Poweredge 1950 server. Using Raid 1, install Freebsd 10.2 and I am now recieving this error CAM status: Unrecoverable Host Bus Adapter Error. Can anyone tell me what is happening and is it fatal? Thanks Darrell From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Mar 18 11:12:29 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1C06AD57AE for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:12:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tmacintyre@outlook.com) Received: from DUB004-OMC3S19.hotmail.com (dub004-omc3s19.hotmail.com [157.55.2.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 823531EAF for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:12:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tmacintyre@outlook.com) Received: from emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([157.55.2.7]) by DUB004-OMC3S19.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Fri, 18 Mar 2016 04:11:19 -0700 Received: from VI1PR05MB1343.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.162.122.17) by VI1PR05MB1342.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.162.122.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.434.16; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:11:18 +0000 Received: from VI1PR05MB1343.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.122.17]) by VI1PR05MB1343.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.122.17]) with mapi id 15.01.0434.021; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:11:17 +0000 From: Timothy Macintyre To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: FreeBSD 9.0 16kb Page Size Thread-Topic: FreeBSD 9.0 16kb Page Size Thread-Index: AQHRgQZRiqBUlaTEwUqLSvGGVnwODA== Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:11:17 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-GB X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: freebsd.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;freebsd.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=outlook.com; x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-tmn: [PLIkis8FjktWJFDUnAuV18O7W0UoSxv7] x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 800fe577-79c0-4d94-8503-08d34f1e072c x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; VI1PR05MB1342; 23:+uxXoK4qYLGjPGFPfpNskVEDfEHeT1oodXNx8IWgsyjDb2jLVzgiBwXW/qmZk1FQGvFvxLhx1MKggKzZSpyY/w3e+7sGxMjlvV33T37ShkjIW5F2ytOXe6uZ46PLeRZPfXKxlwEYtxaVeGhxX1NfUc3Y4IGZB47v6oNkKsHyazHzwLQk5rBQ1gp4BZvXjz5A5vhxOjEU5Dxhx0AHklFUaQ==; 5:sCk1wV9K9Nuw8jXG/IFxdg+9yqOpFI6jrjKELSLIXxkXfxDtfaaLWl0vLs+4MucozkPSYX0SSMNGBZpVJqA8l0VekO4zbP/gxgFbYOVkfFt6l3pyWJgam+84fxl3TBMx1oLb4cu2L5Sz708UnTjtsQ==; 24:lJM6yW+eqBv3eZs67wHYpBXIuMVNE48lD9avx/Fcf1kXhfM4FQLmF6J51EXoat1MC3TvsNoS8u3JHEkQq2EIl8ZJSTYhj+HuzuONtTkEWvM= x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:VI1PR05MB1342; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(432015012)(82015046); SRVR:VI1PR05MB1342; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:VI1PR05MB1342; x-forefront-prvs: 088552DE73 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(7070004)(98900003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1901; SCL:1; SRVR:VI1PR05MB1342; H:VI1PR05MB1343.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:ovrnspm; LANG:en; spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 18 Mar 2016 11:11:17.5311 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VI1PR05MB1342 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Mar 2016 11:11:19.0600 (UTC) FILETIME=[E5D23300:01D18106] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:12:30 -0000 Hi, I'm trying to do some testing on FreeBSD 9.0 with the page size set to 16kb= on amd64 but I'm having trouble building a stable kernel. I've changed the PAGE_SHIFT to 14 under param.h and also updated pmap.h/c w= ith the following values so it doesn't complain about invalid struct sizes = at compile but I'm getting a crash after install and reboot. Is there somet= hing I'm missing here? #define _NPCM 12 #define _NPCPV 677 Thanks, Tim. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Mar 18 15:27:15 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3AE9AD575A for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:27:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) Received: from webmail.dweimer.net (24-240-198-188.static.stls.mo.charter.com [24.240.198.188]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C981B36 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:27:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) Received: from webmail.dweimer.local (localhost [10.9.5.2]) by webmail.dweimer.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u2IFRDlO006788 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:27:13 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) Received: (from www@localhost) by webmail.dweimer.local (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u2IFRDUj006787; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:27:13 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) X-Authentication-Warning: webmail.dweimer.local: www set sender to dweimer@dweimer.net using -f To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Troubleshooting smbfs mount NetBIOS name resolution MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:27:13 -0500 From: dweimer Organization: dweimer.net Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net Mail-Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net Message-ID: <083f0d154aa9f2ea1087eb39c0e170db@dweimer.net> X-Sender: dweimer@dweimer.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2-beta X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:27:15 -0000 I am having an issue mounting smbfs shares on my system. mount_smbfs: can't get server address: syserr = Can't assign requested address I know its failing the NetBIOS name resolutioni, but I don't know why, and cona't find a way to troubleshoot it. the fstab entries are: //SMBFS@workstation/Music /jails/webmail/ROOT/smbfs/workstation/Music smbfs rw,late,-N,noauto 0 0 //SMBFS@workstation/Documents /jails/webmail/ROOT/smbfs/workstation/Documents smbfs rw,late,-N,noauto 0 0 //SMBFS@workstation/Downloads /jails/webmail/ROOT/smbfs/workstation/Downloads smbfs rw,late,-N,noauto 0 0 //SMBFS@workstation/Pictures /jails/webmail/ROOT/smbfs/workstation/Pictures smbfs rw,late,-N,noauto 0 0 //SMBFS@workstation/Videos /jails/webmail/ROOT/smbfs/workstation/Videos smbfs rw,late,-N,noauto 0 0 I can work around it simply by using the -I switch mount_smbfs -I workstation //SMBFS@workstation/Music /jails/webmail/ROOT/smbfs/workstation/Music Every way I can think to test name resolution works, for both the short and fqdns name for the host, and I have an entry for it in /etc/nsmb.conf for it. [WORKSTATION:SMBFS] password=$$[**snip**] addr=10.9.5.66 There is an entry in the hosts file for this machine, think that was added some time back due to issues with smbfs mounts. Anyone have any ideas on how to troubleshoot the NetBIOS name resolution? -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Mar 18 15:38:40 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ECCBAD5B41 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:38:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uthra.r.rao@nasa.gov) Received: from ndjsvnpf102.ndc.nasa.gov (NDJSVNPF102.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.1.152]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C865D120E for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:38:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uthra.r.rao@nasa.gov) Received: from ndmsppt105.ndc.nasa.gov (ndmsppt105.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.0.70]) by ndjsvnpf102.ndc.nasa.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id F03024014002 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:38:31 -0500 (CDT) Received: from NDMSCHT102.ndc.nasa.gov (ndmscht102-pub.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.0.202]) by ndmsppt105.ndc.nasa.gov (8.15.0.59/8.15.0.59) with ESMTP id u2IFcVKN005344 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:38:31 -0500 Received: from NDMSMBX403.ndc.nasa.gov ([169.254.2.155]) by NDMSCHT102.ndc.nasa.gov ([198.117.0.202]) with mapi id 14.03.0266.001; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:38:31 -0500 From: "Rao, Uthra R. (GSFC-672.0)[ADNET SYSTEMS INC]" To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: unable to boot to FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p31 Thread-Topic: unable to boot to FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p31 Thread-Index: AdGBLHM8vw8ZO/tYQ1C+0QDPSeW/5w== Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:38:30 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [128.183.173.175] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2016-03-18_08:, , signatures=0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:38:40 -0000 I updated my FreeBSD 10 system to 10.1-RELEASE-p31 and rebooted. The system= is not booting. I see the following message on the screen: ZFS: i/o error - all block copies unavailable ZFS: can't read MOS of pool tank gptzfsboot: failed to mount default pool Please let me know how I can fix this issue. Thank You. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Mar 18 15:49:04 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D8DAD5E98 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:49:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no (smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no [IPv6:2001:700:1100:1:200:ff:fe00:b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no", Issuer "Fagskolen i Gj??vik" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 664161A43 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:49:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from mail.fig.ol.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u2IFmvib018796 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:48:57 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from localhost (trond@localhost) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id u2IFmvDA018793; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:48:57 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.fig.ol.no: trond owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:48:57 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= Sender: Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no To: "Rao, Uthra R. (GSFC-672.0)[ADNET SYSTEMS INC]" cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: unable to boot to FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p31 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) Organization: Fagskolen Innlandet OpenPGP: url=http://fig.ol.no/~trond/trond.key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:49:05 -0000 On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:38-0000, Rao, Uthra R. (GSFC-672.0)[ADNET SYSTEMS...: > I updated my FreeBSD 10 system to 10.1-RELEASE-p31 and rebooted. The system is not booting. I see the following message on the screen: > > ZFS: i/o error - all block copies unavailable > ZFS: can't read MOS of pool tank > gptzfsboot: failed to mount default pool > > Please let me know how I can fix this issue. Here's a quick laundry list: Ensure all disks are available and visible to the firmware. Someone else on one of the lists made a change to the disk controller, thus limiting the number of visible disks. Once that was rectified everything was back to normal. A description of your zpools layout would be nice. Any changes done to your zpools during operation prior to reboot, like adding disks only visible to the kernel, and not the firmware nor the boot loaders. Try booting one of the 10.3 snapshots to see if the pools are healthy. I hope others might chime in with far better suggestions than mine. -- +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, | | Trond Endrestřl, | Trond Endrestřl, | | IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, | | Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gjřvik Technical College, Norway, | | tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, | | sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. | +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Mar 18 16:25:18 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A46FAD4907 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:25:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pathiaki2@yahoo.com) Received: from nm42-vm4.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm42-vm4.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [216.109.114.191]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43A00D00 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:25:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pathiaki2@yahoo.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1458318119; bh=mxpG4kl5wAn3iVrJHElGbr7VNdTSIPTtrUtmqk0Zc8A=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; b=kSYIB9Us6S4z7hi1BDabOxnhLCjPf+tNTNnGnQ4ChdO10rWKwekBVtUMRQORApYpDDmEAdN6U7ewKwbDnU6dlocgXXkO+Vywv+hNl0gx1twJF2x3OxtQb1o8vP/ui8BAOpAgmYhKWKC7er+A9nO80MX/nJ+PnlJ9Mk4p/4cx2o4vvSEZtpCpbWVc4i568TqLhLCFZ1A/srrON679pjshUSSGr7cjWSGSe2w2YM9A37TtyckhZOPPBzbxOGZptGIhx1RmGs21Ud5WqgOUEtL3ILiVzQNw1jLnpJyCRQozL3iZq6scaQ8SI+6kj4ls+v0fL3WKycT39IXjipiqQ8s/NA== Received: from [98.139.170.179] by nm42.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Mar 2016 16:21:59 -0000 Received: from [98.139.211.192] by tm22.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Mar 2016 16:21:59 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp201.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Mar 2016 16:21:59 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 702368.93731.bm@smtp201.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: UwFfpy0VM1nUXZVjrIcoUn9zDLBaZuVhSCmVAUfXeFBN0k1 z0heXoCoz2ewCJi6_x7aCKMemOmP5wBjHWHuL7pw17r22EfcZZBUwcXD8Bk1 I95LkOcwam5o6EfmhVy3VkpqVPc4m.UN1ZRoE1MHjRPBIODbD3O1QV_OnTkX pW5MIYMtOpwHaAugfMyBH5Lxb3uftUaIxUAeKZFry0pFf.NFJUbLfPReJEM. jcQUQ2pdEVr6lmr9AziVcp0JO0Ij9NAinWkIjUFyAonRz.go0OK0_GeeukYq s2pJ7z4rTy314weD9GZhw8xvANdMT0pkTdIRNsjf7HaxOC8gUWpjjsrkyLFV HxdmMUOxe4TTgCSp6ms_L_q6C9_FUZy5B90q1rpsrcvMTE9phVx9E2cD84av I5UcnLf5AhfmEQpmgbSsg0wdjw8Q8Ze7gGnPitdIac8qPSa00sDXVokW8yPk onK26rXsoBHTtvC8k3nVic5hXoawcKZe7zIZ2eBctVK6BU4T5qWY2W7whNBP uAcNREKDirxF1zuk6bmdbBlAyqXcnDdE- X-Yahoo-SMTP: h3Xqg6.swBC0yI913RMMwp94grO_cg-- Subject: Re: unable to boot to FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p31 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: pathiaki2 Message-ID: <56EC2B25.3020601@yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 12:21:57 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:25:18 -0000 On 03/18/2016 11:48, Trond Endrestřl wrote: > On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:38-0000, Rao, Uthra R. (GSFC-672.0)[ADNET SYSTEMS...: > >> I updated my FreeBSD 10 system to 10.1-RELEASE-p31 and rebooted. The system is not booting. I see the following message on the screen: >> >> ZFS: i/o error - all block copies unavailable >> ZFS: can't read MOS of pool tank >> gptzfsboot: failed to mount default pool >> >> Please let me know how I can fix this issue. > Here's a quick laundry list: > > Ensure all disks are available and visible to the firmware. Someone > else on one of the lists made a change to the disk controller, thus > limiting the number of visible disks. Once that was rectified > everything was back to normal. > > A description of your zpools layout would be nice. Any changes done to > your zpools during operation prior to reboot, like adding disks only > visible to the kernel, and not the firmware nor the boot loaders. > > Try booting one of the 10.3 snapshots to see if the pools are healthy. > > I hope others might chime in with far better suggestions than mine. > After you follow through on all the above, if it doesn't resolve it. Do a man gptzfsboot and follow the examples. You will probably want to stamp a new bootstrap on the boot drive partition. (This is only if you used GPT and the BOOT disk is ZFS - seems to be) Since you probably have the media on a USB or DVD, boot from it and get into a shell and re-stamp the bootstrap on the correct disk. gpart show will show you the partition table. Chances are, partition 1 is the one you want to stamp and should say freebsd-boot: gpart show => 34 5860533101 ada0 GPT (2.7T) 34 6 - free - (3.0K) 40 1024 1 freebsd-boot (512K) <------SEE THIS? 1064 4194304 2 freebsd-swap (2.0G) 4195368 3032 - free - (1.5M) 4198400 5856333824 3 freebsd-zfs (2.7T) 5860532224 911 - free - (456K) From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Mar 18 16:31:58 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86D4FAD4C43 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:31:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DC391190 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:31:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1agxJT-0003DU-Rf for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 17:31:48 +0100 Received: from 65.75.36.70 ([65.75.36.70]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 17:31:47 +0100 Received: from gyliamos by 65.75.36.70 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 17:31:47 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Will Parsons Subject: Re: Trouble recovering after re-installing CUPS Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:31:32 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 23 Message-ID: References: <20160317102511.035de93e@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> Reply-To: gyliamos@gmail.com X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.75.36.70 User-Agent: slrn/1.0.2 (FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:31:58 -0000 On Thursday, 17 Mar 2016 5:25 AM -0400, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 21:42:21 +0000 (UTC) Will Parsons wrote: >> I re-installing cups (after deleting cups-base, cups-client, >> cups-image, and cups-pstoraster), but have lost hplip. An attempt to >> re-install it fails with: >> >> ===> Registering installation for hplip-3.16.2 >> pkg-static: Unable to access file /usr/ports/print/hplip/work/stage/usr/local/etc/cups/pstotiff.convs: No such file or directory >> pkg-static: Unable to access file /usr/ports/print/hplip/work/stage/usr/local/etc/cups/pstotiff.types: No such file or directory >> *** [fake-pkg] Error code 74 >> >> % uname -a >> FreeBSD anukis.local 9.3-RELEASE-p21 FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p21 #0: Tue Jul 28 08:57:41 UTC 2015 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 >> >> >> How can I proceed to resolve this? > > Thanks for the report. I've committed a fix in r411264. Thank you very much for the prompt patch. -- Will From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Mar 18 19:36:35 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BEC7AD50D8 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 19:36:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Received: from ns.umpquanet.com (ns.umpquanet.com [98.158.10.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1990CD25 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 19:36:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Received: from ns.umpquanet.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns.umpquanet.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u2IJa3hT025060 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 12:36:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Received: (from james@localhost) by ns.umpquanet.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id u2IJa3Ov025059 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 12:36:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 12:36:03 -0700 From: Jim Long To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Seeking a solid startup script for node.js/forever Message-ID: <20160318193603.GA20566@ns.umpquanet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 19:36:35 -0000 I have found the following rc.d script for running node.js/forever apps under FreeBSD. I'm not an expert, but the script looks fairly well-structured. The problem is, it doesn't fork the process into the background. And since this runs in a jail, that means that 'service jail start' never completes. Here's the script (which I found at https://gist.github.com/jellea/6510897), along with a dialog showing how I enable it, and what happens when I attempt to start it (along with a ^T and a ^C at the end). The only work-around I have at this time is to leave the service disabled in /etc/rc.conf, and start it manually from the jail's /etc/rc.local with '/usr/local/etc/rc.d/iws onestart &' so that the start-up script is forced into the background. How can I modify this script so that it will start cleanly in the background? Thank you! Please cc: me on any replies sent to the list. Jim # cat /usr/local/etc/rc.d/iws #!/bin/sh # PROVIDE: forever # REQUIRE: NETWORKING SERVERS DAEMON # BEFORE: LOGIN # KEYWORD: shutdown # Taken from http://habrahabr.ru/post/137857/ . /etc/rc.subr name="forever" forever="/usr/local/bin/node /usr/local/bin/forever" workdir="/usr/local/IWS4" #script="web.js" #script="app.js" script="${workdir}/app.js" rcvar=iws_enable extra_commands="status" start_cmd="start" status_cmd="status" stop_cmd="stop" restart_cmd="restart" load_rc_config $name eval "${rcvar}=\${${rcvar}:-'NO'}" HOME=/usr/local/IWS4 start() { NODE_ENV=production su -m www -c "exec ${forever} start -a -l ${HOME}/forever.log -o ${HOME}/output.log -e ${HOME}/error.log -p /var/run/forever ${script}" } status() { su -m www -c "exec ${forever} list" } stop() { su -m www -c "exec ${forever} stop ${script}" } restart() { su -m www -c "exec ${forever} restart ${script}" } run_rc_command "$1" # echo 'iws_enable="YES"' >> /etc/rc.conf # time service iws start warn: --minUptime not set. Defaulting to: 1000ms warn: --spinSleepTime not set. Your script will exit if it does not stay up for at least 1000ms info: Forever processing file: /usr/local/IWS4/app.js load: 0.11 cmd: node 24068 [uwait] 125.56r 0.26u 0.01s 0% 33384k ^C real 2m56.348s user 0m0.268s sys 0m0.039s # From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Mar 18 21:37:36 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D69EDAD4B9F for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 21:37:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Received: from ns.umpquanet.com (ns.umpquanet.com [98.158.10.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD3E8B3D for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 21:37:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Received: from ns.umpquanet.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns.umpquanet.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u2ILbZLg044120 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 14:37:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Received: (from james@localhost) by ns.umpquanet.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id u2ILbZYC044119 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 14:37:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from list@museum.rain.com) Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 14:37:35 -0700 From: Jim Long To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Seeking a solid startup script for node.js/forever Message-ID: <20160318213735.GA43466@ns.umpquanet.com> References: <20160318193603.GA20566@ns.umpquanet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160318193603.GA20566@ns.umpquanet.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 21:37:36 -0000 On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:36:03PM -0700, Jim Long wrote: > How can I modify this script so that it will start cleanly in the > background? I guess the obvious, brute force solution is: --- iws.orig 2016-03-18 14:35:21.206449824 -0700 +++ iws 2016-03-18 14:33:39.770357734 -0700 @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ start() { NODE_ENV=production - su -m www -c "exec ${forever} start -a -l ${HOME}/forever.log -o ${HOME}/output.log -e ${HOME}/error.log -p /var/run/forever ${script}" + su -m www -c "exec ${forever} start -a -l ${HOME}/forever.log -o ${HOME}/output.log -e ${HOME}/error.log -p /var/run/forever ${script}" & } status() but if anyone has something more elegant, I'd be grateful to learn of it. Jim From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Mar 18 21:54:11 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7446CAD5310 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 21:54:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from james@umpquanet.com) Received: from ns.umpquanet.com (ns.umpquanet.com [98.158.10.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A9821885 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 21:54:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from james@umpquanet.com) Received: from ns.umpquanet.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns.umpquanet.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u2ILsAHf046796 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 14:54:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from james@ns.umpquanet.com) Received: (from james@localhost) by ns.umpquanet.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id u2ILsA4H046795 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 14:54:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from james@ns.umpquanet.com) Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 14:54:10 -0700 From: Jim Long To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Seeking a solid startup script for node.js/forever Message-ID: <20160318215410.GA45558@ns.umpquanet.com> References: <20160318193603.GA20566@ns.umpquanet.com> <20160318213735.GA43466@ns.umpquanet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160318213735.GA43466@ns.umpquanet.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 21:54:11 -0000 Sigh. I should test before I post. The fix below is not sufficient. It "mostly works" from inside the jail: jailname : 14:44:06 /# service iws stop jailname : 14:44:17 /# service iws start jailname : 14:44:19 /# warn: --minUptime not set. Defaulting to: 1000ms warn: --spinSleepTime not set. Your script will exit if it does not stay up for at least 1000ms info: Forever processing file: /usr/local/IWS4/app.js But it doesn't work from outside the jail. "service jail start" doesn't return to a shell prompt unless I hit Ctrl-C. hostname : 14:44:41 /root# service jail stop Stopping jails: jailname hostname : 14:44:45 /root# time service jail start Starting jails: load: 0.13 cmd: node 25865 [uwait] 94.17r 0.23u 0.03s 0% 33028k ^C real 1m41.749s user 0m0.010s sys 0m0.017s hostname : 14:44:23 /root# On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 02:37:35PM -0700, Jim Long wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:36:03PM -0700, Jim Long wrote: > > How can I modify this script so that it will start cleanly in the > > background? > > I guess the obvious, brute force solution is: > > --- iws.orig 2016-03-18 14:35:21.206449824 -0700 > +++ iws 2016-03-18 14:33:39.770357734 -0700 > @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ > start() > { > NODE_ENV=production > - su -m www -c "exec ${forever} start -a -l ${HOME}/forever.log -o ${HOME}/output.log -e ${HOME}/error.log -p /var/run/forever ${script}" > + su -m www -c "exec ${forever} start -a -l ${HOME}/forever.log -o ${HOME}/output.log -e ${HOME}/error.log -p /var/run/forever ${script}" & > } > > status() > > > but if anyone has something more elegant, I'd be grateful to learn of it. > > Jim From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Mar 18 23:45:33 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A6A6AD5557 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 23:45:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from robert.m.candey@nasa.gov) Received: from ndjsvnpf104.ndc.nasa.gov (NDJSVNPF104.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.1.154]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09AB6BB0 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 23:45:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from robert.m.candey@nasa.gov) Received: from ndmsppt104.ndc.nasa.gov (ndmsppt104.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.0.69]) by ndjsvnpf104.ndc.nasa.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB38040655CF; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 18:45:25 -0500 (CDT) Received: from NDMSCHT113.ndc.nasa.gov (ndmscht113-pub.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.0.213]) by ndmsppt104.ndc.nasa.gov (8.15.0.59/8.15.0.59) with ESMTP id u2INjPn5020029; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 18:45:25 -0500 Received: from Dragonfly.local (198.119.59.10) by smtp02.ndc.nasa.gov (198.117.0.213) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.266.1; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 18:45:24 -0500 Subject: Re: FW: unable to boot to FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p31 References: CC: "Rao, Uthra R. (GSFC-672.0)[ADNET SYSTEMS INC]" , To: , From: "Robert M. Candey" Message-ID: <56EC9314.2020302@nasa.gov> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 19:45:24 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP: [198.119.59.10] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2016-03-18_11:, , signatures=0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 23:45:33 -0000 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Mar 18 23:52:36 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97B4EAD58D2 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 23:52:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:c4ea:bd49:619b:6cb3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50FE4102B for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 23:52:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from liminal.local (liminal.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3636:3bff:fed4:b0d6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BE609E363 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 23:52:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/BE609E363; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral Subject: Re: Seeking a solid startup script for node.js/forever To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20160318193603.GA20566@ns.umpquanet.com> <20160318213735.GA43466@ns.umpquanet.com> <20160318215410.GA45558@ns.umpquanet.com> From: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <56EC94B9.3010003@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 23:52:25 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160318215410.GA45558@ns.umpquanet.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KmMdkaW4kHOockCC6NiIuUbupf99B00Gd" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 23:52:36 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --KmMdkaW4kHOockCC6NiIuUbupf99B00Gd Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Bh9iJhsQkEdrh4i4Srp0Tto6vLpTiQ5Xk" From: Matthew Seaman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <56EC94B9.3010003@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Seeking a solid startup script for node.js/forever References: <20160318193603.GA20566@ns.umpquanet.com> <20160318213735.GA43466@ns.umpquanet.com> <20160318215410.GA45558@ns.umpquanet.com> In-Reply-To: <20160318215410.GA45558@ns.umpquanet.com> --Bh9iJhsQkEdrh4i4Srp0Tto6vLpTiQ5Xk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 18/03/2016 21:54, Jim Long wrote: > Sigh. I should test before I post. >=20 > The fix below is not sufficient. It "mostly works" from inside the jai= l: >=20 daemon(8) sounds like what you need. Cheers, Matthew --Bh9iJhsQkEdrh4i4Srp0Tto6vLpTiQ5Xk-- --KmMdkaW4kHOockCC6NiIuUbupf99B00Gd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJW7JS/XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATVWMP/i+X+t0nJyWHMyN3ovT6IcHk 8qnSe/GJ6akorrJYybhaS5VAPmP9LoQ6AievMVpVJqlxwTHj2JZrwKR0rCROfJEG Ltqvp26OmGpYXl6/z2bZIhey5TK1FhvLVht8YIDTJf8sVcGlriOZIPdBhYZYIeNP BhG4zG7tF9sYA6rk4YjVEgg6KJ2rZ7AN7jMO3iVRjTuOSVUHmC2axVKIbK1So7gX nbIsYiMqu9GyA+Q6a7sTi912qW+fOFgh3PIVCYzoKnYQ9DSKhiLn1CDvazwDiYOP R51m61Uw/+zo1mMSIlzj+lZAr/WbFvoVhjxszogFhyH4f7PI9G53xH1zstosob69 mPMCinJlboCP3PJzfBLsUTh/ciSxNboHIjCs/DFDI+8F870KHMnJFSsm1TGU4tF0 2g8XmBtEF3iwx26Ts9pEXd01b+vKyMAiFSjD0eZVb+hUOZSH44jpXhl1EfIA3vMD bsFgq0YK3KB75HDI6lxazKi+rdjrYxxfVCm5+AclA45OdSiZrMrrZJTMsnVlaG2D DVX8cSm2D0hTpNPU2guNmsivDROBjYtHYV5M+rdZVbzUTbPEAc8ukzbF7HOIvp0Z LiSzrtXowQOQVyZr1S8PmuzKimos7y7TSfbEz6ooRZU0XuXtDqarXaiiTexHNfb9 63N0+F2iLmFaGTPKXqvo =Cqu6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KmMdkaW4kHOockCC6NiIuUbupf99B00Gd-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Mar 19 12:35:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F469AD4D34 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 12:35:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48A8EB0 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 12:35:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-32-133.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.32.133]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F614276C3; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 13:27:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id u2JCRqIn002218; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 13:27:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 13:27:52 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Timothy Macintyre Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.0 16kb Page Size Message-Id: <20160319132752.932a5a1e.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 12:35:02 -0000 On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:11:17 +0000, Timothy Macintyre wrote: > I'm trying to do some testing on FreeBSD 9.0 with the page size > set to 16kb on amd64 but I'm having trouble building a stable kernel. > > I've changed the PAGE_SHIFT to 14 under param.h and also updated > pmap.h/c with the following values so it doesn't complain about > invalid struct sizes at compile but I'm getting a crash after > install and reboot. Is there something I'm missing here? > > > #define _NPCM 12 > #define _NPCPV 677 You should probably repeat that experiment with a currently supported code base. FreeBSD 9.0 is already EOL. The best idea would be to use the FreeBSD 10.2 release (amd64) and make the required changes. In case you have a valid reason not to use FreeBSD 10, but instead need to keep FreeBSD 9, try the most current release, which is FreeBSD 9.3. Remember: it's a legacy release, not a production release. If you have done this and you're still experiencing problems, write to the freebsd-hackers@ mailing list, which is primarily intended for higher-level "Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD", as freebsd-questions@ is mostly a users' question list (less technical, often focused on "easy" problems). Messing with the bowels of the kernel's memory management isn't a typical "user question". ;-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Mar 19 12:37:36 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FB0CAD4EA1 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 12:37:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vsasjason@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com (mail-wm0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A8CD1FD for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 12:37:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vsasjason@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id p65so101061820wmp.1 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 05:37:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=orOGjBN88ZBB/+EXY+p061Rk8KJqLEBq8BzKtAkeE50=; b=o3K3AHErZfVjre7rkbt8wFgA3ZzQbDqjVRlRmpmUsVfGbPmNsZt/wti5jefzHM19He LzayDdHKdkTF/9R8MBbU9tAqBujFJ/k1dZVocbBc8518FhV3bndgU+afCCYN2rk6ori7 qRFlSdgmtQ7DR+BAZ4umZgvkCi7MtX4fvFmxxd7c53RV9C47Re3sWeHM9G0BBIkrS3YT sC19GpEC/j9/rYkIg+bLI5G4BxEFnfXbR68HMRJwk2zbXg+BJWVjEMGZfYW4ZtMnaMcT MMt+oEfTXKuqbqJzzSHX98/DVFRIxv4IlgLF4HHYmV1sFxSwik6lhk35u9M/NppKzkdZ XX+g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=orOGjBN88ZBB/+EXY+p061Rk8KJqLEBq8BzKtAkeE50=; b=GsRsl9x7gIMeSoEE3R+zWUndU5Vlp9QqlTCOWT8d96cjhGrjUIVDbFG8ALPoSl1fHm rNdDW1A99bzcicaBxKuew/Veqfd6QcEniRzDg0hBaZBpEpinAzx8EcWFnVPNQk48VC8Q 87iHMznvgEoGgQ9IqPxwj4IXl/DOb7VbgsatWMcUIt7HYwpznKnj+bYrbIdPFTMmkb0H i7xn9RpHxpgFIkp4tYQ59toKbKSEiWg9yO+D0oCkXNJCz6U6O/DSAYx78Vubx5F+S92W fbTbWUEk+6YteGZwhx5uztvm7oC7RHfs1EyUbJUE210MaOjR6CjemVpNcXC3IsGEpWXc 0PSQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJL5I59E4XZwj8noGS2pzCvjdDHQirt4QvJjwvlPcACOLnpNoAGpkkJXMKn7ZoKVtmH7nj8EYapoOqE2pA== X-Received: by 10.28.52.197 with SMTP id b188mr4243787wma.77.1458391054309; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 05:37:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.246.73 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 05:37:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160319132752.932a5a1e.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20160319132752.932a5a1e.freebsd@edvax.de> From: Anton Sayetsky Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 14:37:14 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.0 16kb Page Size To: Polytropon Cc: Timothy Macintyre , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 12:37:36 -0000 2016-03-19 14:27 GMT+02:00 Polytropon : > On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:11:17 +0000, Timothy Macintyre wrote: >> I'm trying to do some testing on FreeBSD 9.0 with the page size >> set to 16kb on amd64 but I'm having trouble building a stable kernel. >> >> I've changed the PAGE_SHIFT to 14 under param.h and also updated >> pmap.h/c with the following values so it doesn't complain about >> invalid struct sizes at compile but I'm getting a crash after >> install and reboot. Is there something I'm missing here? >> >> >> #define _NPCM 12 >> #define _NPCPV 677 > > You should probably repeat that experiment with a currently > supported code base. FreeBSD 9.0 is already EOL. The best > idea would be to use the FreeBSD 10.2 release (amd64) and > make the required changes. > > In case you have a valid reason not to use FreeBSD 10, but > instead need to keep FreeBSD 9, try the most current release, > which is FreeBSD 9.3. Remember: it's a legacy release, not a > production release. You're wrong. I've just checked official FreeBSD site: >LATEST RELEASES >Production: 10.2, 10.1, 9.3 > If you have done this and you're still experiencing problems, > write to the freebsd-hackers@ mailing list, which is primarily > intended for higher-level "Technical Discussions relating to > FreeBSD", as freebsd-questions@ is mostly a users' question > list (less technical, often focused on "easy" problems). > Messing with the bowels of the kernel's memory management > isn't a typical "user question". ;-) From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Mar 19 12:45:52 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19A7CAD520C for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 12:45:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5A637F9 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 12:45:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-32-133.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.32.133]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9BC3276DE; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 13:45:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id u2JCjnpv002371; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 13:45:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 13:45:49 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Anton Sayetsky Cc: Timothy Macintyre , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.0 16kb Page Size Message-Id: <20160319134549.5bf3019f.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20160319132752.932a5a1e.freebsd@edvax.de> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 12:45:52 -0000 On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 14:37:14 +0200, Anton Sayetsky wrote: > 2016-03-19 14:27 GMT+02:00 Polytropon : > > On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:11:17 +0000, Timothy Macintyre wrote: > >> I'm trying to do some testing on FreeBSD 9.0 with the page size > >> set to 16kb on amd64 but I'm having trouble building a stable kernel. > >> > >> I've changed the PAGE_SHIFT to 14 under param.h and also updated > >> pmap.h/c with the following values so it doesn't complain about > >> invalid struct sizes at compile but I'm getting a crash after > >> install and reboot. Is there something I'm missing here? > >> > >> > >> #define _NPCM 12 > >> #define _NPCPV 677 > > > > You should probably repeat that experiment with a currently > > supported code base. FreeBSD 9.0 is already EOL. The best > > idea would be to use the FreeBSD 10.2 release (amd64) and > > make the required changes. > > > > In case you have a valid reason not to use FreeBSD 10, but > > instead need to keep FreeBSD 9, try the most current release, > > which is FreeBSD 9.3. Remember: it's a legacy release, not a > > production release. > You're wrong. I've just checked official FreeBSD site: > >LATEST RELEASES > >Production: 10.2, 10.1, 9.3 Hmmm... are we looking at different pages? * quote * Currently Supported Releases Complete information about the release date, the classification type, and the estimated End-Of-Life (EOL) for currently supported releases can be found on the Supported Releases section of the FreeBSD Security Information page. Most Recent Releases Production Release Release 10.2 (August 2015) Announcement : Release Notes : Installation Instructions : Hardware Notes : Readme : Errata Release 10.1 (November 2014) Announcement : Release Notes : Installation Instructions : Hardware Notes : Readme : Errata Legacy Release Release 9.3 (July 2014) Announcement : Release Notes : Installation Instructions : Hardware Notes : Readme : Errata * end quote * Source: https://www.freebsd.org/releases/ Still, the FreeBSD 9 path won't continue in the future, so FreeBSD 10 is the preferred way to go, because the support for the legacy release FreeBSD 9.3 will end soon. Especially FreeBSD 9.0 is mentioned in the "Prior Releases Which Have Reached End-Of-Life" list. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Mar 19 12:49:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0732AD5424 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 12:49:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vsasjason@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x236.google.com (mail-wm0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A34C9D8 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 12:49:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vsasjason@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x236.google.com with SMTP id p65so70478352wmp.0 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 05:49:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=TSKRQn7rb/rX8+Il9T33Mi0Ho9v9xkpjr6krVsdxvRE=; b=yZQUZdsBzD0RQGaiivFLzFQAC75nA0wdSXgks5XdWNe/vVbaR2p4OQIdcpDB4Wn+DR DHqoj9WQUVofxUdpRB31C9Jy0SVOiY2HGnavOzXDl3yZyPULA17JmWORIGuc2S9DQLiP l/5wY7Kh9ClLSpqvFGUnxIu0o/YM6a5tMYOtMkVWigprHVElf8DFIk4qkSIhiFiXjwyR Qqyi+/5nIVpiV1sqep8sfMweR9xDtYpu15EB8+wiXEZPgFuPvQcZvMYWMd9XPpvcg+2d Up7Z3Ug7KyiuGLzKfco+D+vSiuivp8zLXvZh7Ol2IL4t1PqbhFLtUkKLLzO0ilNHkdnl NMJw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=TSKRQn7rb/rX8+Il9T33Mi0Ho9v9xkpjr6krVsdxvRE=; b=nHl0UuRpXHpVCTl1LXG1BckI/KEXMGLCmz8ALLLBMyxQ2bm9XJMwsh9sQdzfTh3rub tho4BkCH1HDuUbFtyB2QcBjiFSgWkPB4f7qs5LN0m7x7ocYZTLxTPA9/Ij622C2f+dnx FsRZ2glDpOQ1LY7vwK/s3VG/7CC9eQtjMK+BsBAVtOuwYxWbmhHFF5TwuFjzU74o8Ij2 N/c3PIZWGXgVsmwK3Zf2XZDUh4zD8xx6MLQVGyXoQl4UkETf6ifK6Ntk3HH6AtG+0LKw nRA63uhEosEHPnXlAJdKZLB15DlmUKSHIveteXSLN+IPYtW5faxDdK6XnlB65pNFZ93f jNEw== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIE5VgCqKdt65FAOwgdHcMK4C/FAg/WCwPqDMBXUIC5+x2DzzhZEUXiOgUegBihoPwjht0f+7mCWGDuxQ== X-Received: by 10.194.113.130 with SMTP id iy2mr20852957wjb.56.1458391761655; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 05:49:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.246.73 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 05:49:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160319134549.5bf3019f.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20160319132752.932a5a1e.freebsd@edvax.de> <20160319134549.5bf3019f.freebsd@edvax.de> From: Anton Sayetsky Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 14:49:02 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.0 16kb Page Size To: Polytropon Cc: Timothy Macintyre , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 12:49:23 -0000 2016-03-19 14:45 GMT+02:00 Polytropon : > On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 14:37:14 +0200, Anton Sayetsky wrote: >> 2016-03-19 14:27 GMT+02:00 Polytropon : >> > On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:11:17 +0000, Timothy Macintyre wrote: >> >> I'm trying to do some testing on FreeBSD 9.0 with the page size >> >> set to 16kb on amd64 but I'm having trouble building a stable kernel. >> >> >> >> I've changed the PAGE_SHIFT to 14 under param.h and also updated >> >> pmap.h/c with the following values so it doesn't complain about >> >> invalid struct sizes at compile but I'm getting a crash after >> >> install and reboot. Is there something I'm missing here? >> >> >> >> >> >> #define _NPCM 12 >> >> #define _NPCPV 677 >> > >> > You should probably repeat that experiment with a currently >> > supported code base. FreeBSD 9.0 is already EOL. The best >> > idea would be to use the FreeBSD 10.2 release (amd64) and >> > make the required changes. >> > >> > In case you have a valid reason not to use FreeBSD 10, but >> > instead need to keep FreeBSD 9, try the most current release, >> > which is FreeBSD 9.3. Remember: it's a legacy release, not a >> > production release. >> You're wrong. I've just checked official FreeBSD site: >> >LATEST RELEASES >> >Production: 10.2, 10.1, 9.3 > > Hmmm... are we looking at different pages? Doh, it's true. According to main page, you're wrong. According to releases page, you're right. %) But in fact I agree that one should not use 9.x at all. > * quote * > > Currently Supported Releases > > Complete information about the release date, the classification type, > and the estimated End-Of-Life (EOL) for currently supported releases > can be found on the Supported Releases section of the FreeBSD Security > Information page. > > Most Recent Releases > > Production Release > > Release 10.2 (August 2015) Announcement : Release Notes : Installation Instructions : Hardware Notes : Readme : Errata > > Release 10.1 (November 2014) Announcement : Release Notes : Installation Instructions : Hardware Notes : Readme : Errata > > Legacy Release > > Release 9.3 (July 2014) Announcement : Release Notes : Installation Instructions : Hardware Notes : Readme : Errata > > * end quote * > > Source: > > https://www.freebsd.org/releases/ > > Still, the FreeBSD 9 path won't continue in the future, so > FreeBSD 10 is the preferred way to go, because the support for > the legacy release FreeBSD 9.3 will end soon. > > Especially FreeBSD 9.0 is mentioned in the "Prior Releases Which > Have Reached End-Of-Life" list. > > > -- > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Mar 19 14:41:53 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 987CCAD4838 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 14:41:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E931CE0 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 14:41:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from kabini1.local (user-24-214-48-39.knology.net [24.214.48.39]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id u2JEdrpw012523 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 09:39:54 -0500 To: FreeBSD Questions !!!! From: "William A. Mahaffey III" Subject: Problems w/ mgdiff across my LAN Message-ID: <56ED64B9.2000300@hiwaay.net> Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 09:45:23 -0453.75 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 14:41:53 -0000 I am trying to use mgdiff (from ports) to look for differences between 2 ASCII files (ANSI C, actually). I am logged into the box where the files reside from this box, running FreeBSD 9.3R, patched up: [wam@kabini1, ~, 9:40:46am] 488 % uname -a FreeBSD kabini1.local 9.3-RELEASE-p33 FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p33 #0: Wed Jan 13 17:55:39 UTC 2016 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 [wam@kabini1, ~, 9:40:47am] 488 % On the other box (also FBSD 9.3R, I get: [wam@devbox, Vector, 9:36:54am] 734 % xdiff main.c Main.c Error: Can't open display: localhost:11.0 [wam@devbox, Vector, 9:37:04am] 735 % which xdiff xdiff: aliased to mgdiff -args -wB [wam@devbox, Vector, 9:37:17am] 736 % uname -a FreeBSD devbox 9.3-RELEASE-p33 FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p33 #0: Wed Jan 13 17:55:39 UTC 2016 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 [wam@devbox, Vector, 9:37:27am] 737 % I ssh-ed into the other box (devbox) from this box (kabini1) under tcsh in an rxvt shell. I have been having variations of this problem for a while, but worked around it by cd-ing to the remote dir from this box & then mgdiff-ing. I can do that here as well, but that is clumsy & I suspect that there is a simple bit of pilot error causing this issue, which I would like to fix :-). Any clues appreciated. TIA & have a good one. -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Mar 19 15:02:30 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4077FAD55E7 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 15:02:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from laszlo.danielisz@yahoo.com) Received: from nm32-vm9.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm32-vm9.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.136.216.232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A1161DA8 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 15:02:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from laszlo.danielisz@yahoo.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1458399625; bh=UNJSe0f9W8rmKhdgAVkCmRzGIfSrLsRM2Ah6hy4zyJA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=Ldm604qAftP4NB7wpb1sMYgxCYd3+z+wvE0lKw7kJ0BoJQhA7p0HWct+CJM58j/R8FINfXRFgnPrLkzbExry3mcYH9mbYJMujyJ9xTjf7fNbnF6e+CI6EGreEJmm8nQa137220v2UKpfEZiUit0wiTxeoKiaJ4f1kcBDToT7FmVcdGNfDBZNQwQJLS9Fbzf6pI2vR6pmG/kX6A2n+19KLTNfAH1iRROTLm3yqEPqT+xRHTLbghYO0flav7AtxRey1TcYnII3oYFGpKN5pSGy9T53iLM/QKYKmEUgC8E8hHi7uLIE2EO+wOJTS/Bs0yKGamy47/wrUZYbkZHY1I3Abg== Received: from [127.0.0.1] by nm32.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Mar 2016 15:00:25 -0000 Received: from [98.137.12.57] by nm32.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Mar 2016 14:57:42 -0000 Received: from [98.139.215.143] by tm2.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Mar 2016 14:57:41 -0000 Received: from [98.139.212.214] by tm14.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Mar 2016 14:57:41 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1023.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Mar 2016 14:57:41 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-4 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 649477.4106.bm@omp1023.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-YMail-OSG: NWjOfnIVM1keiipee.tjsB1eBGCO8F6tLut2Bts0RYFupVUMwsKNEprHUXH3osi S5kcSMwkdG_dKoa4XXktBSHzFcdmC7BqNOQRMD0Gs9LY4JxXrMn6S7tG33HqkBmAmVTbezTPn3Sz IOFpPXh9Px8WIKIkl0XZ_PCLQQyogxuuGx8twMKlqdJfTBtP7HqyMq6ebNX_88pQR1RNOyGjrMWC K2B1ZBoMgzuwUFIKRnHTDuw_pAsoRv2n8ix3ohNghoGEaictq9MMa_iBpwWGae2BnQ0dNLS8sswW lrpPYFWU21Gg3_GZL59n4pSSbp4_NdcYx4q5qjABCkcIUQdYtbRKpHVjLbNoMDiiR4KIgUoP4L1O TaFE1.Va1bku8s09Vov24XkMFqiKIbE9eYhmoeHJL8Aog6lTQ8hVyNAY7Xc6fEUZNlsBbxg_9SsB ODkE8kAP5o._Ownt7zMEWsWlhzvx1MCM_mGNbuKvyjFUbPT7zRqLhQJggJ9YxFqHCjiu503P8JUM 4JUsOx0blLKwS4.EziTuuwVv_Ti1sO6uv Received: by 66.196.81.106; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 14:57:41 +0000 Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 14:57:40 +0000 (UTC) From: Reply-To: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Nagy_L=C3=A1szl=C3=B3_Zsolt?= , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Message-ID: <794632038.1462836.1458399460917.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <56EAD246.7090009@shopzeus.com> References: <56EAD246.7090009@shopzeus.com> Subject: Re: c-icap exists without notice MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 15:02:30 -0000 Hi Zsolt, It might be silly but have you tried running it with strace? Laci=20 On Thursday, March 17, 2016 12:00 PM, Nagy L=C3=A1szl=C3=B3 Zsolt wrote: =20 I have installed the c-icap server port and squidclamav. When I try to start it in foreground+debug mode, the following happens: # /usr/local/bin/c-icap -f /usr/local/etc/c-icap/c-icap.conf -D The acl spec all does not exists! squidclamav.c(183) squidclamav_init_service: DEBUG Going to initialize squidclamav LOG Reading configuration from /usr/local/etc/c-icap//squidclamav.conf LOG Reading directive maxsize with value 5000000 LOG Reading directive clamd_local with value /var/run/clamav/clamd.sock LOG Reading directive timeout with value 1 LOG Reading directive logredir with value 0 LOG Reading directive dnslookup with value 1 LOG Reading directive safebrowsing with value 0 Warning, alias is the same as service_name, not adding # In other words: it reads all config files. Apparently there are no errors (only LOG lines and a single WARNING). Then the program exits without any explanation and I get back the shell prompt. I think it should work as a service but it does not. If I try to start it from an rc script then the same happens: # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/c-icap start Starting c_icap. # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/c-icap status c_icap is not running. There is nothing in the system log. There seems to be no "error" except that it does not start. Without getting any error message, I find it very hard to figure this out. Environment: FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE c-icap-0.3.5_2,2 squidclamav-6.13 Thanks. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Mar 19 15:19:54 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBAD0AD5B95 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 15:19:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B7E76C for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 15:19:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from lowell-desk.lan (router.lan [172.30.250.2]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3668933C27; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 11:19:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 4344039822; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 11:19:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Anton Sayetsky Cc: Polytropon , Timothy Macintyre , "freebsd-questions\@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.0 16kb Page Size References: <20160319132752.932a5a1e.freebsd@edvax.de> <20160319134549.5bf3019f.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 11:19:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Anton Sayetsky's message of "Sat, 19 Mar 2016 14:49:02 +0200") Message-ID: <444mc2lckz.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 15:19:54 -0000 Anton Sayetsky writes: > 2016-03-19 14:45 GMT+02:00 Polytropon : >> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 14:37:14 +0200, Anton Sayetsky wrote: >>> 2016-03-19 14:27 GMT+02:00 Polytropon : >>> > On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:11:17 +0000, Timothy Macintyre wrote: >>> >> I'm trying to do some testing on FreeBSD 9.0 with the page size >>> >> set to 16kb on amd64 but I'm having trouble building a stable kernel. >>> >> >>> >> I've changed the PAGE_SHIFT to 14 under param.h and also updated >>> >> pmap.h/c with the following values so it doesn't complain about >>> >> invalid struct sizes at compile but I'm getting a crash after >>> >> install and reboot. Is there something I'm missing here? >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> #define _NPCM 12 >>> >> #define _NPCPV 677 >>> > >>> > You should probably repeat that experiment with a currently >>> > supported code base. FreeBSD 9.0 is already EOL. The best >>> > idea would be to use the FreeBSD 10.2 release (amd64) and >>> > make the required changes. >>> > >>> > In case you have a valid reason not to use FreeBSD 10, but >>> > instead need to keep FreeBSD 9, try the most current release, >>> > which is FreeBSD 9.3. Remember: it's a legacy release, not a >>> > production release. >>> You're wrong. I've just checked official FreeBSD site: >>> >LATEST RELEASES >>> >Production: 10.2, 10.1, 9.3 >> >> Hmmm... are we looking at different pages? > Doh, it's true. According to main page, you're wrong. According to > releases page, you're right. %) > But in fact I agree that one should not use 9.x at all. As far as I can see, the pages don't disagree, and you (Anton) and Polytropon are also saying the same thing. 9.0 is past end-of-life, 9.3 is supported, 10.2 is recommended for new installs. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Mar 19 16:21:17 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1BADAD6E1C for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 16:21:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from khitai.pang@outlook.com) Received: from BLU004-OMC4S24.hotmail.com (blu004-omc4s24.hotmail.com [65.55.111.163]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B6F15F4 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 16:21:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from khitai.pang@outlook.com) Received: from BLU436-SMTP55 ([65.55.111.137]) by BLU004-OMC4S24.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Sat, 19 Mar 2016 09:21:10 -0700 X-TMN: [GDBinbnoH31DtJXEGKbEHVduAGgS6ca2] X-Originating-Email: [khitai.pang@outlook.com] Message-ID: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Khitai Pang Subject: indexinfo: not found Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 00:21:38 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Mar 2016 16:21:09.0546 (UTC) FILETIME=[58B498A0:01D181FB] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 16:21:17 -0000 Hi, I install all packages by ports. I have indexinfo installed in my system: > pkg info|grep indexinfo indexinfo-0.2.4 Utility to regenerate the GNU info page index When I remove a package, I often see this: indexinfo: not found pkg: POST-DEINSTALL script failed I reinstalled indexinfo by "portmaster --force-config print/indexinfo" but the issue still exists. Any idea? Thanks Khitai From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Mar 19 21:23:16 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D621AD650E for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 21:23:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tyler@tysdomain.com) Received: from tds-solutions.net (tds-solutions.net [174.136.96.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3829D1D4D for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 21:23:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tyler@tysdomain.com) Received: from tds-solutions.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tds-solutions.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5297208782E for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 17:23:15 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at tds-solutions.net Received: from tds-solutions.net ([127.0.0.1]) by tds-solutions.net (tds-solutions.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id PZ22yzofOvYN for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 17:23:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [10.0.0.3] (c-50-164-134-175.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [50.164.134.175]) (Authenticated sender: sorressean) by tds-solutions.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 131B0208779C for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 17:23:14 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: tyler@tysdomain.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "Littlefield, Tyler" Subject: questions re: upgrading current and jail package management Message-ID: <56EDC48A.6040001@tysdomain.com> Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 17:28:42 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 21:23:16 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 All, I have a few questions I was hoping someone could help me with. I'm running FreeBSD 11 using IOCage for jails. Thus far, I have a couple questions here: 1) When I portsnap fetch extract in a jail, I get a message telling me that /usr/ports is not writable. When I touch a file in /usr/ports I'm told it's a read-only filesystem, but mount only shows the root directory being mounted. Is this typical? if so, how should ports be installed? I read that you should not build ports in a jail, but a few of the jails I am using have different port builds from the pkg defaults. I need to build them individually. Is there a better way to do this? 2) I seen some information about setting a property on IOCage that allows zfs datasets to be mounted into the jail. There is already a dataset being used though; is there a way to mount multiples? To provide some context, I want to run Samba from within a jail. I wish to nullfs-mount the /storage/media into the jail to enable Samba to access it. 3) I am running FreeBSD-11. Is there a good way to update short of rebuilding everything? I don't mind doing that, but it's somewhat time consuming. Also mergemaster has a bad habbit of breaking my /etc/passwd files, etc. Thanks, - -- Take care, Ty Twitter: @sorressean Web: https://tysdomain.com Pubkey: https://tysdomain.com/files/pubkey.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJW7cSKAAoJEAdP60+BYxejE8MH/Rc4rMvzbeJV73suAbZt+Lqe dqi1KGaes31XWvy2ezkmr6N6kC5lU8sSYboxhIpiGYUaKuAFAp2DdSyk3EOGc3e+ ZwxX/erD1exy0CHpEVstOXVwtwOHTUcrlmdLpozj0OHtgMiOi6uE1KucCK+olli1 B+hIebpDelK66zzm1fUo4CKvRNm8qLmBZ2Pagln7fFdaUOGupDMVln70o5sQxbbc AWGCH1saABMj5kTLL/wxmODC+DgBKar7KaMDBjdEX3DfWatZ8//IDktcfx3lbnbh 7O8zjN9tekAoQafOZvwjj/4Z9DVUXDTwa5koy4CzL8GFWEK7/ZLwIlNpeCCzbrM= =eLu1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----