From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Oct 29 00:44:21 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id AAA04269
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 29 Oct 1995 00:44:21 -0700
Received: from io.org (io.org [142.77.70.2])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id AAA04263
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 29 Oct 1995 00:44:18 -0700
Received: from flinch.io.org (flinch.io.org [198.133.36.153]) by io.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id CAA22176; Sun, 29 Oct 1995 02:44:14 -0500
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 1995 02:44:14 -0500 (EST)
From: Brian Tao <taob@io.org>
To: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM>
cc: FREEBSD-HACKERS-L <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: panic: free vnode isn't 
In-Reply-To: <199510290554.WAA03343@corbin.Root.COM>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.951029024236.232A-100000@flinch.io.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, 28 Oct 1995, David Greenman wrote:
>
> >panic: biodone: page busy < 0
> 
>    Yes, this particular bug has already been fixed...

    Okay, that's what I thought... I remember seeing "biodone"
mentioned a lot a few months ago in relation to kernel panics.

> Yeah, I see similarly high collision rates on wcarchive's ethernet - but
> this isn't a surprise with 325 users banging on it. :-)

    Time for multiple interfaces or 100-Mbps technology?  :)
--
Brian Tao (BT300, taob@io.org)
Systems Administrator, Internex Online Inc.
"Though this be madness, yet there is method in't"