From owner-freebsd-scsi Sun Oct 1 11:00:51 1995 Return-Path: owner-freebsd-scsi Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id LAA20963 for freebsd-scsi-outgoing; Sun, 1 Oct 1995 11:00:51 -0700 Received: from irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de [141.76.1.11]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA20941 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 1995 11:00:37 -0700 Received: from sax.sax.de by irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with ESMTP id TAA27825 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 1995 19:00:33 +0100 Received: by sax.sax.de (8.6.11/8.6.12-s1) with UUCP id TAA28866 for freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org; Sun, 1 Oct 1995 19:00:33 +0100 Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.6.12/8.6.9) id SAA16036 for freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org; Sun, 1 Oct 1995 18:36:04 +0100 From: J Wunsch Message-Id: <199510011736.SAA16036@uriah.heep.sax.de> Subject: kern/753: archive tape drive does not work on 2.1 STABLE (fwd) To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 1 Oct 1995 18:36:03 +0100 (MET) Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 2696 Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk What happened with our ideas about an "approximate match" for the ID string? Everybody out there swamped in paywork? Perhaps i should commit the "od" driver first without the changes in scsi_config.c, just to have it there and accessible for other people's experiments as well. Opinions? As curt@emergent.com wrote: > From joerg_wunsch Thu Sep 28 18:22:48 1995 > Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 1995 04:50:02 -0700 > Resent-Message-Id: <199509281150.EAA11812@freefall.freebsd.org> > Resent-From: gnats@freefall.freebsd.org (GNATS Management) > Resent-To: freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org > Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats@freefall.freebsd.org, curt@emergent.com > Message-Id: <199509281144.EAA07512@bluewhale.emergent.com> > Date: Thu, 28 Sep 1995 04:44:34 -0700 > From: curt@emergent.com > Reply-To: curt@emergent.com > To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org > X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.2 > Subject: kern/753: archive tape drive does not work on 2.1 STABLE > Sender: owner-bugs@freebsd.org > Precedence: bulk > > > >Number: 753 > >Category: kern > >Synopsis: my archive scsi tape drive does not work > >Confidential: no > >Severity: non-critical > >Priority: medium > >Responsible: freebsd-bugs > >State: open > >Class: change-request > >Submitter-Id: current-users > >Arrival-Date: Thu Sep 28 04:50:01 PDT 1995 > >Last-Modified: > >Originator: Curt Mayer > >Organization: > >Release: FreeBSD 2.1-STABLE i386 > >Environment: > > 2.1 STABLE,. 486dx2-66, 1542cf, archive viper 525 > > >Description: > > the scsi tape rogue detection is way too stupid. > it simply does a search, and looks for exact matches. > if you have a rogue that does not exactly match, it will > lose. > > >How-To-Repeat: > > boot any 2.1 kernel > st -f /dev/rst0.1 rew > > >Fix: > > patch scsi/st.c with the following lines: > > *** /sys/scsi/st.c Sat Jul 22 01:49:19 1995 > --- /usr/home/curt/st.c Thu Sep 28 04:42:42 1995 > *************** > *** 122,127 **** > --- 122,136 ---- > {0, 0, QIC_120} /* minor 12,13,14,15 */ > } > }, > + {"Rev 2 of the Archive 2525", "ARCHIVE ", "VIPER 2525 25916", "-002", > + 0, > + { > + {0, ST_Q_SNS_HLP, 0}, /* minor 0,1,2,3 */ > + {0, ST_Q_SNS_HLP, QIC_525}, /* minor 4,5,6,7 */ > + {0, 0, QIC_150}, /* minor 8,9,10,11 */ > + {0, 0, QIC_120} /* minor 12,13,14,15 */ > + } > + }, > {"Archive Viper 150", "ARCHIVE ", "VIPER 150", "????", > ST_Q_NEEDS_PAGE_0, > { > >Audit-Trail: > >Unformatted: > -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)