From owner-freebsd-security Sun Apr 9 12:07:27 1995 Return-Path: security-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id MAA29453 for security-outgoing; Sun, 9 Apr 1995 12:07:27 -0700 Received: from aries.ibms.sinica.edu.tw ([140.109.40.248]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA29447 for ; Sun, 9 Apr 1995 12:07:23 -0700 Received: (from taob@localhost) by aries.ibms.sinica.edu.tw (8.6.11/8.6.9) id DAA27405; Mon, 10 Apr 1995 03:05:28 +0800 Date: Mon, 10 Apr 1995 03:05:28 +0800 (CST) From: Brian Tao cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: satan "heavy" mode attacks In-Reply-To: <199504081658.MAA29650@ns1.win.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: security-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sat, 8 Apr 1995, Mark Hittinger wrote: > > We probably need to double check our inetd and make sure it can deal with > the resource overload issue. No problems on 950322-SNAP machines. Ran SATAN in heavy scan mode from my two FreeBSD boxes against each other, simultaneously. Machines didn't even blink once. :) -- Brian ("Though this be madness, yet there is method in't") Tao taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw <-- work ........ play --> taob@io.org