From owner-freebsd-security  Wed Aug 23 09:34:36 1995
Return-Path: security-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id JAA11965
          for security-outgoing; Wed, 23 Aug 1995 09:34:36 -0700
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id JAA11957
          for <security@freebsd.org>; Wed, 23 Aug 1995 09:34:33 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id JAA08313 for <security@freebsd.org>; Wed, 23 Aug 1995 09:34:30 -0700
Prev-Resent: Wed, 23 Aug 1995 09:34:29 -0700
Prev-Resent: "security@freebsd.org "
Received: from freefall.FreeBSD.org (freefall.cdrom.com [192.216.222.4]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id JAA08300 for <jkh@time.cdrom.com>; Wed, 23 Aug 1995 09:32:29 -0700
Received: from wc.cdrom.com (wc.cdrom.com [192.216.223.37])
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id JAA11906
          for <jkh@freefall.FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 23 Aug 1995 09:32:27 -0700
Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [192.216.223.34])
          by wc.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA01579
          for <jkh@wc.cdrom.com>; Wed, 23 Aug 1995 09:32:06 -0700
Received: from narq.avian.org (wet-string.avian.org [199.103.168.126])
          by who.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.11) with ESMTP id JAA24187
          for <jkh@cdrom.com>; Wed, 23 Aug 1995 09:32:08 -0700
Received: (from hobbit@localhost) by narq.avian.org (8.6.12/_H*) id KAA13102 for jkh@cdrom.com; Wed, 23 Aug 1995 10:05:23 -0400
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 1995 10:05:23 -0400
From: *Hobbit* <hobbit@avian.org>
Message-Id: <199508231405.KAA13102@narq.avian.org>
To: jkh@cdrom.com
Subject: quick question
Resent-To: security@freebsd.org
Resent-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 1995 09:34:30 -0700
Resent-Message-ID: <8311.809195670@time.cdrom.com>
Resent-From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: security-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

are you guys aware of the possibility that Freebsd kerberized "rcp" silently
fails to encrypt the data when invoked with the "-x" option?  If you're not
the right person to ask I'll be happy to fire off a discussion with whoever's
overseeing that code.  Integrating kerberos stuff is great, but should be
tested carefully!

_H*