From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Apr 21 03:02:57 1996 Return-Path: owner-chat Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id DAA11939 for chat-outgoing; Sun, 21 Apr 1996 03:02:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.19]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id DAA11934 for ; Sun, 21 Apr 1996 03:02:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.6.12/8.6.9) id UAA18538; Sun, 21 Apr 1996 20:00:16 +1000 Date: Sun, 21 Apr 1996 20:00:16 +1000 From: Bruce Evans Message-Id: <199604211000.UAA18538@godzilla.zeta.org.au> To: bde@zeta.org.au, jkh@time.cdrom.com Subject: Re: A request about comments in programs Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk [Redirected to -chat from -core] >> I think this meaning is netspeak. All my (old) dictionaries say that >> it means "arguable, debatable, open to debate, etc". >That's actually pretty interesting - I've never heard it used in that >way. This should probably be redirected to -chat, but I'd still be >curious if any of the other core members here have heard "moot" used >in the manner you've seen it defined! I checked some more (small, old) dictionaries. The above meaning survives translations: Putnam's Contemporary French Dictionary (copyright 1969 by Collins, 1972 by Putnam, Berkeley Medallion edition 1976): moot a discutable discutable a debatable, disputable Collins German-English English-German Dictionary (copyright 1953 by Collins, reprinted 1963): Moot-point n. strittiger Punkt Strittig a. in dispute Collins seems to agree with itself :-). Bruce