From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Aug 11 00:23:32 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id AAA18688
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 11 Aug 1996 00:23:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA18682
          for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 11 Aug 1996 00:23:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA00942; Sun, 11 Aug 1996 00:23:17 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199608110723.AAA00942@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.5 12/11/95
To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch)
cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG (FreeBSD hackers)
Subject: Re: kern_mib.c:int securelevel = -1; 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 11 Aug 1996 08:50:10 +0200."
             <199608110650.IAA04874@uriah.heep.sax.de> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 1996 00:23:16 -0700
From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>From The Desk Of J Wunsch :
> Alas, this would require to move many chipset-specific hacks into the
> kernel, something that doesn't fit in the current model.  It's really

Yes, it would reguire a bit of work and thats about it . Specially,
since the X server already knows the chipset and can pass the information
to the driver.

Personally, I rather leave things the way they are and if not I can always
hack it  back to my preference..

	Regards,
	Amancio