From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Nov 24 12:05:56 1996 Return-Path: owner-stable Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA09161 for stable-outgoing; Sun, 24 Nov 1996 12:05:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from gvr.win.tue.nl (root@gvr.win.tue.nl [131.155.210.19]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA09147 for ; Sun, 24 Nov 1996 12:05:34 -0800 (PST) Received: (from guido@localhost) by gvr.win.tue.nl (8.8.2 with smtp patch/8.8.2) id VAA00723; Sun, 24 Nov 1996 21:04:46 +0100 (MET) From: Guido van Rooij Message-Id: <199611242004.VAA00723@gvr.win.tue.nl> Subject: Re: Announce: Sendmail 8.8.3 in stable In-Reply-To: <199611221744.JAA06363@precipice.shockwave.com> from Paul Traina at "Nov 22, 96 09:44:27 am" To: pst@shockwave.com (Paul Traina) Date: Sun, 24 Nov 1996 21:04:46 +0100 (MET) Cc: nate@mt.sri.com, tom@uniserve.com, stable@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Paul Traina wrote: > From: Nate Williams > Subject: Re: Announce: Sendmail 8.8.3 in stable > > I've passed off diffs for the hard part of the bind update to peter > > for review, however there's no need to upgrade to 4.9.5, just apply > > the patch (which I think I also applied to stable yesterday). > > Right, but that patch broke libresolv. > > Wait, let's be clear here. > > Are you saying that the following patch broke libresolv? How? > This is *not* the same as the patch guido sent out. I didn;t send any patch. -Guido