From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Jul 20 08:28:35 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA20335
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 20 Jul 1997 08:28:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from iafnl.es.iaf.nl (uucp@iafnl.es.iaf.nl [195.108.17.20])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id IAA20330
          for <FreeBSD-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 20 Jul 1997 08:28:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iafnl.es.iaf.nl with UUCP id AA00517
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for FreeBSD-hackers@freebsd.org); Sun, 20 Jul 1997 17:28:47 +0200
Received: (from wilko@localhost) by yedi.iaf.nl (8.8.5/8.6.12) id RAA02191 for FreeBSD-hackers@freebsd.org; Sun, 20 Jul 1997 17:26:06 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Wilko Bulte <wilko@yedi.iaf.nl>
Message-Id: <199707201526.RAA02191@yedi.iaf.nl>
Subject: ipfw and secure http
To: FreeBSD-hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD hackers list)
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 1997 17:26:06 +0200 (MET DST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8a]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Quick question: I just had a little collision with ipfw (due to me..).
I tried to access a server that uses secure http (is that the right
name for it anyway?). In any case it wanted to access the port#
corresponding to https (instead of http).

Am I correct in assuming the packetfiltering characteristics are identical
to http save for the https port# ?

Wilko
_     ____________________________________________________________________
 |   / o / /  _  Bulte  email: wilko@yedi.iaf.nl - Arnhem, The Netherlands
 |/|/ / / /( (_) 	Do, or do not. There is no 'try' - Yoda
--------------------------------------------------------------------------