From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Oct 12 00:10:17 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id AAA04032 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 12 Oct 1997 00:10:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA04027 for ; Sun, 12 Oct 1997 00:10:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA08482; Sun, 12 Oct 1997 00:03:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from current1.whistle.com(207.76.205.22) via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpd008475; Sun Oct 12 07:02:55 1997 Date: Sun, 12 Oct 1997 00:01:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: Terry Lambert cc: bradley@dunn.org, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: UUCP (important clarification) In-Reply-To: <199710110219.TAA10855@usr02.primenet.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk so what about mail queued to multiple domains? On Sat, 11 Oct 1997, Terry Lambert wrote: > > sendmail's way of queueing mail is not compatible > > with ETRN. > > This is probably more accurate. > > It's actually a pretty simple hack to sendmail to name the file based > on the destination domain, and a little more complicated to make it > queue run only on that domain. > > Actually, I have a slightly different gross hack I've used to avoid > hacking the sendmail queueing itself (still have to hack ETRN, though): > > o Under cron, grep the domain(s) you ETRN for out of the header > entries in the queue, and move them to another (domain specific) > directory. > > o Connect the ETRN up for the domain so that it uses the > -oQ > > You just have to be sure to process it frequently enough (or at the > right times) to avoid introducing a delivery latency. > > Then ETRN never runs except on files queued for a particular domain. > > > Terry Lambert > terry@lambert.org > --- > Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present > or previous employers. >