From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jan 22 23:14:43 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA03037 for stable-outgoing; Wed, 22 Jan 1997 23:14:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from main.bsd.zerodist.com (ts51-ip67.tp.silkera.net [203.70.2.67]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA03016; Wed, 22 Jan 1997 23:14:32 -0800 (PST) Received: (from root@localhost) by main.bsd.zerodist.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id OAA08431; Fri, 23 Jan 1998 14:58:28 GMT Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 14:58:27 +0000 () From: Charlie ROOT To: current@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Ip masquerade and sockd Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk My LAN is using IPs from 192.168.x.x. Using sockd, netscape browser can browse Internet from any PC in the LAN. Is this the main functionality of IP masquerrade? If so, why not use sockd? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jan 22 23:48:05 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA04578 for stable-outgoing; Wed, 22 Jan 1997 23:48:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns.tp.silkera.net (ns.tp.silkera.net [203.70.2.9]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA04549; Wed, 22 Jan 1997 23:47:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from dorothy.bsd.zerodist.com (ts62-ip78.tp.silkera.net [203.70.2.78]) by ns.tp.silkera.net (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id PAA29102; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 15:49:59 +0800 (CST) Message-ID: <32E71839.4BA@ms2.hinet.net> Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 15:50:17 +0800 From: zerodist Reply-To: zerodist@ms2.hinet.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Ip masquerade and sockd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk My LAN is using IPs from 192.168.x.x. Using sockd, netscape browser can browse Internet from any PC in the LAN. Is this the main functionality of IP masquerrade? If so, why not use sockd? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 23 00:17:53 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA06400 for stable-outgoing; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 00:17:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns.tp.silkera.net (ns.tp.silkera.net [203.70.2.9]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA06372; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 00:17:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from dorothy.bsd.zerodist.com (ts62-ip78.tp.silkera.net [203.70.2.78]) by ns.tp.silkera.net (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id QAA29995; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 16:19:43 +0800 (CST) Message-ID: <32E71F38.246E@ms2.hinet.net> Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 16:20:08 +0800 From: zerodist Reply-To: zerodist@ms2.hinet.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: PPP dynamic IP routing Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I use a dial up phone to dial up to my ISP. Both my ISP and I got ip addresses randomly. To do automatic routing, I use Ip style as follows in ppp.conf and ppp.linkup. ifconfig 203.70.2.66/24 203.70.2.4/24 in ppp.conf add 0 0 203.70.2.4/24 in ppp.linkup But it seems not much help. Now I still have to add default route manually. In linux I can solve this problem using device name. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 23 02:33:09 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id CAA13000 for stable-outgoing; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 02:33:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from asstdc.scgt.oz.au (root@asstdc.scgt.oz.au [202.14.234.65]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA12979; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 02:33:02 -0800 (PST) Received: (from imb@localhost) by asstdc.scgt.oz.au (8.7.6/BSD4.4) id VAA08180 Thu, 23 Jan 1997 21:32:31 +1100 (EST) From: michael butler Message-Id: <199701231032.VAA08180@asstdc.scgt.oz.au> Subject: Re: Ip masquerade and sockd In-Reply-To: <32E71839.4BA@ms2.hinet.net> from zerodist at "Jan 23, 97 03:50:17 pm" To: zerodist@ms2.hinet.net Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 21:32:30 +1100 (EST) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk zerodist writes: > My LAN is using IPs from 192.168.x.x. Using sockd, netscape browser > can browse Internet from any PC in the LAN. > Is this the main functionality of IP masquerrade? If so, why not use > sockd? Functionality is not the only issue to be considered. Licensing terms and conditions are also relevant, michael