From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Apr 1 12:29:58 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA27668 for stable-outgoing; Tue, 1 Apr 1997 12:29:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from nora.pcug.co.uk (Nora.PCUG.CO.UK [192.68.174.71]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA27663 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 1997 12:29:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from imdb.demon.co.uk by nora.pcug.co.uk id aa29089; 1 Apr 97 21:29 BST Date: Tue, 1 Apr 1997 21:29:36 +0100 (BST) From: Rob Hartill X-Sender: robh@localhost To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: 2.2 using more memory than 2.17 ? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Looking at "top" on some of my servers, the ones I've moved to 2.2 are using far more memory than those still on 2.1.7 Is this to be expected ? e.g. on identical P6s the 2.2 box has "60-70mb" active and the 2.1.7 box has "30-40mb". Two P5s running 2.1.7/2.2 show the same type of difference. I'm running an Apache binary with mod_perl that was compiled on a 2.1.7 system. Would the old binary/libs make a difference w.r.t memory usage ? There's little else running on the machines. I'll recompile my httpd when I've finished upgrading all the machines. -- Rob Hartill Internet Movie Database (Ltd) http://us.imdb.com/tour - bring a packed lunch.. it's big!