From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Nov 23 07:21:52 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id HAA14177 for stable-outgoing; Sun, 23 Nov 1997 07:21:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable) Received: from dragon.awen.com (dragon.awen.com [207.33.155.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA14172 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 1997 07:21:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mburgett@dragon.awen.com) Received: (from mburgett@localhost) by dragon.awen.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) id HAA05883; Sun, 23 Nov 1997 07:21:46 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199711231521.HAA05883@dragon.awen.com> From: "Mike Burgett" To: "stable@freebsd.org" Date: Sun, 23 Nov 97 07:21:46 -0800 Reply-To: "Mike Burgett" Priority: Normal X-Mailer: PMMail 1.92 For OS/2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: re: nfs and mounting more than once. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >If anyone is feeling adventurous, I'd like to get feedback about any >unintended side effects. I run a simple system here, with no union mounts, >diskless clients or any other stuff that this could break. :) Before anyone misunderstands my intent, with that message from yesterday, it's not intended as any kind of submission or request to be considered for such. My intent was to possibly get wider testing feedback than I can do here, and some constructive suggestions from folks who understand the vfs code. Thanks, Mike