From owner-freebsd-emulation Sun Nov 8 12:36:28 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA18386 for freebsd-emulation-outgoing; Sun, 8 Nov 1998 12:36:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from korin.warman.org.pl (korin.nask.waw.pl [148.81.160.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA18289 for ; Sun, 8 Nov 1998 12:35:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from abial@nask.pl) Received: from localhost (abial@localhost) by korin.warman.org.pl (8.9.1/8.8.5) with SMTP id VAA20463; Sun, 8 Nov 1998 21:41:47 +0100 (CET) X-Authentication-Warning: korin.warman.org.pl: abial owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1998 21:41:47 +0100 (CET) From: Andrzej Bialecki X-Sender: abial@korin.warman.org.pl To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG cc: abial@nask.pl Subject: StarOffice 4.0 and cmdline patch Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, What's the general feeling about patching our procfs to implement /proc/*/cmdline, which is (insanely) required by StarOffice? We can hide it under some PROCFS_CMDLINE config option, but this would definitely help people... Now, they have to track down the patches on DejaNews, then apply them (which is not obvious, because they are relative to some early 3.0-current)... this is too demanding on newbies who just want to make use of our Linux emulation. I've got the diffs relative to 3.0-R and current, and I could do this if no one objects... Andrzej Bialecki -------------------- ++-------++ ------------------------------------- ||PicoBSD|| FreeBSD in your pocket? Go and see: Research & Academic |+-------+| "Small & Embedded FreeBSD" Network in Poland | |TT~~~| | http://www.freebsd.org/~picobsd/ -------------------- ~-+==---+-+ ------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message