From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Mar 8 00:37:39 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA29437 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Sun, 8 Mar 1998 00:37:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from verdi.nethelp.no (verdi.nethelp.no [195.1.171.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id AAA29432 for ; Sun, 8 Mar 1998 00:37:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sthaug@nethelp.no) From: sthaug@nethelp.no Received: (qmail 13258 invoked by uid 1001); 8 Mar 1998 08:37:24 +0000 (GMT) To: mike@smith.net.au Cc: marcs@znep.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kernel wishlist for web server performance In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 08 Mar 1998 00:02:07 -0800" References: <199803080802.AAA09131@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.05+ on Emacs 19.28.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 08 Mar 1998 09:37:23 +0100 Message-ID: <13256.889346243@verdi.nethelp.no> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > HTTP-NG, which is currently under very initial development, will > > almost certainly allow for multiplexed transfers. ie. multiple > > documents multiplexed over a single TCP connection. > > Ugh. Why multiplex over an already-multiplexing protocol? This sounds > like yet another attempt at trying to get around a problem with a new > solution rather than fixing the original one. You should follow the discussion on end2end-interest@isi.edu. Yes, this is the initial reaction of many people, but it may still be a good idea. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message