From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Sep 27 07:45:07 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA06139 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Sun, 27 Sep 1998 07:45:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from haldjas.folklore.ee (Haldjas.folklore.ee [193.40.6.121]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA06132 for ; Sun, 27 Sep 1998 07:45:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee) Received: from haldjas.folklore.ee (haldjas.folklore.ee [172.17.2.1] (may be forged)) by haldjas.folklore.ee (8.8.8/8.8.4) with SMTP id RAA09387; Sun, 27 Sep 1998 17:44:45 +0300 (EEST) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1998 17:44:45 +0300 (EEST) From: Narvi To: Studded cc: The Subject: Re: COMPAT_43 In-Reply-To: <360D4E83.8B656BC9@dal.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 26 Sep 1998, Studded wrote: > I'm curious as to whether/how much the COMPAT_43 option is still needed > in a modern system. Before someone says, "Why don't you take it out and > find out for yourself?" I would be glad to do that and report the > results (after the release of course) if someone could state with > reasonable assurance that most things would still work. :) > xterm AFAIK used to be one that needed it. It has probably been corrected since. > Thanks, > > Doug Sander There is no love, no good, no happiness and no future - all these are just illusions. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message