From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Dec 27 01:23:17 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA26631 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Sun, 27 Dec 1998 01:23:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from esmeralda.xaa.iae.nl (esmeralda.xaa.iae.nl [194.151.75.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA26626 for ; Sun, 27 Dec 1998 01:23:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd@xaa.iae.nl) Received: by esmeralda.xaa.iae.nl (Postfix, from userid 1008) id 2FDD224A; Sun, 27 Dec 1998 10:22:56 +0100 (MET) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1998 10:22:56 +0100 From: Mark Huizer To: Yoshinobu Inoue , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPv6 - when? which? Message-ID: <19981227102256.A2771@esmeralda.xaa.iae.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Yoshinobu Inoue , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG References: <19981226170509.A20826@keltia.freenix.fr> <19981227132444B.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.94.10i In-Reply-To: <19981227132444B.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp>; from Yoshinobu Inoue on Sun, Dec 27, 1998 at 01:24:44PM +0900 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > Then take it either from OpenBSD or from the KAME folks. I think it would > > be unwise to choose one implementation over the other considereing they'll > > be merged in a few months. > KAME for 3.0 is almost ready. (IPsec and IPv6 is working. Some > user-land work is left.) > And I can make KAME for current as the next step, if it is necessary. would be nice, so ppl can start to have a look at it. If Inria and KAME are working towards merging stuff, one might say that playing around with any version of those 2 would be a nice start. I looked at how much work it would be to use the 2.2 patches for 3.0 and gave up after a few hours :-( Mark -- Nice testing in little China... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message