From owner-freebsd-hardware Sun Dec 13 03:58:19 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA20483 for freebsd-hardware-outgoing; Sun, 13 Dec 1998 03:58:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from jmb@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA20421; Sun, 13 Dec 1998 03:58:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jmb) Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 03:58:00 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199812131158.DAA20421@hub.freebsd.org> From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" To: jim@cgi.sstar.com Cc: alpha@FreeBSD.ORG, hardware@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: <199812112343.RAA15525@cgi.sstar.com> (message from Jim King on Fri, 11 Dec 1998 17:43:59 -0600 (CST)) Subject: Re: Hint benchmark on Multia VX40A References: <199812112343.RAA15525@cgi.sstar.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Thanks to Andrew Gallatin for running the Hint benchmarks on a Digital (DEC now Compaq) Alpha Multia VX40A. integer performance is nearly the same as an AMD Am5x86-133. that places it just a tad slower than a Pentium 90 until the dataset size reaches about 12kB (then the p90 falls out of cache). at that point the p90 the am5x86-133 and hte multia are identical till 250kB when the am5x86-133 starts lagging behind the other two. double performance is half way between a Pentium 90 and a PentiumPro 150. conclusions: if you have TrueParity (9bit) memory to spare or dont mind playing three times the price of common memory AND you have a lot of floating point work to do, the multias may be a good fit. as a general purpose computer, they are woefully underpowered. jmb ps. hopefully that creates a record in the mailing lists that will help anyone using the search engine to find out about multias. ;) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message