From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Sep 20 03:37:00 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA27026 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Sun, 20 Sep 1998 03:37:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from news1.gtn.com (news1.gtn.com [194.77.0.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA26910 for ; Sun, 20 Sep 1998 03:34:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.gtn.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by news1.gtn.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with UUCP id MAA29097; Sun, 20 Sep 1998 12:30:12 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from andreas@localhost) by klemm.gtn.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id MAA15295; Sun, 20 Sep 1998 12:19:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas) Message-ID: <19980920121959.A13027@klemm.gtn.com> Date: Sun, 20 Sep 1998 12:19:59 +0200 From: Andreas Klemm To: frank segner , "Stephen D. Spencer" Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: INN 1.7.2 & Device Not Configured error References: <199809181428.QAA15115@blabla.ip.lu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i In-Reply-To: <199809181428.QAA15115@blabla.ip.lu>; from frank segner on Fri, Sep 18, 1998 at 04:28:06PM +0200 X-Disclaimer: A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.0-BETA SMP Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Sep 18, 1998 at 04:28:06PM +0200, frank segner wrote: > I know this might not be a very 'constructive' comment (with respect to the > problem) but have a look at inn-2.1; it runs circles around 1.7.2 (performance > wise) and you don't need any ccd stuff since it's using its > own "CNFS" (Cyclic News File System) Is there a certain reason, why 2.1 is available since July 98 and the information on the webserver still is based on 2.0 and pointing to snapshot releases ? -- Andreas Klemm http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas What gives you 90% more speed, for example, in kernel compilation ? http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~fsmp/SMP/akgraph-a/graph1.html "NT = Not Today" (Maggie Biggs) ``powered by FreeBSD SMP'' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Sep 20 14:54:26 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA15349 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Sun, 20 Sep 1998 14:54:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from cs.rpi.edu (mumble.cs.rpi.edu [128.213.8.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA15335 for ; Sun, 20 Sep 1998 14:54:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from crossd@cs.rpi.edu) Received: from yoyo.cs.rpi.edu (yoyo.cs.rpi.edu [128.213.8.12]) by cs.rpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA01384; Sun, 20 Sep 1998 17:53:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (crossd@localhost) by yoyo.cs.rpi.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id RAA26671; Sun, 20 Sep 1998 17:53:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from crossd@cs.rpi.edu) X-Authentication-Warning: yoyo.cs.rpi.edu: crossd owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 20 Sep 1998 17:53:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "David E. Cross" To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG cc: crossd@cs.rpi.edu Subject: VPN under FreeBSD Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I have looked breifly through the handbook, and did not see this mentioned. I am looking to setup a VPN style interface under FreeBSD. It seems it would be trivial to do using either DIVERT or TUN, has anyone already done this? (Please cc me as I am not on this list) -- David Cross To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Sep 20 14:59:59 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA16255 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Sun, 20 Sep 1998 14:59:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from clifford.inch.com (clifford.inch.com [207.240.140.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA16249 for ; Sun, 20 Sep 1998 14:59:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from omar@clifford.inch.com) Received: (from omar@localhost) by clifford.inch.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA21572; Sun, 20 Sep 1998 17:53:44 -0400 Message-ID: <19980920175344.A21210@clifford.inch.com> Date: Sun, 20 Sep 1998 17:53:44 -0400 From: Omar Thameen To: Francisco Reyes , "freebsd-isp@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Need ISP in 212/718 area References: <199809181334.JAA03417@federation.addy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i In-Reply-To: <199809181334.JAA03417@federation.addy.com>; from Francisco Reyes on Fri, Sep 18, 1998 at 09:34:34AM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The Internet Channel, http://www.inch.com We run FreeBSD exclusively (except for my legacy desktop). Currently our shell machine is 2.1.7, but we should be building a new 2.2.x one RSN. All of our others (news/web/dedicated) are 2.2.7. -- Omar Thameen Systems Administration The Internet Channel omar@inch.com On Fri, Sep 18, 1998 at 09:34:34AM -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote: > On Fri, 18 Sep 1998 04:05:08 -0400, RPD wrote: > > I am aware of "thelist". I guess I forgot to mention that I want an ISP > running on FreeBSD. > Most ISPs don't say on their pages what OS they run on. This is why I > placed the email to the freebsd-isp list. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Sep 20 15:22:39 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA21497 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Sun, 20 Sep 1998 15:22:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from hp9000.chc-chimes.com (hp9000.chc-chimes.com [206.67.97.84]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA21374 for ; Sun, 20 Sep 1998 15:22:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from billf@chc-chimes.com) Received: from localhost by hp9000.chc-chimes.com with SMTP (1.39.111.2/16.2) id AA068816075; Sun, 20 Sep 1998 14:27:55 -0400 Date: Sun, 20 Sep 1998 14:27:55 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Fumerola To: "David E. Cross" Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: VPN under FreeBSD In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org You will want to check out /usr/ports/security/skip, and www.skip.org, I am currently working on implementing it and it seems to do what I need. Alternativly, ssh+ppp never hurt anyone. :> On Sun, 20 Sep 1998, David E. Cross wrote: > I have looked breifly through the handbook, and did not see this > mentioned. I am looking to setup a VPN style interface under FreeBSD. It > seems it would be trivial to do using either DIVERT or TUN, has anyone > already done this? > > (Please cc me as I am not on this list) > -- > David Cross > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > - bill fumerola [root/billf]@chc-chimes.com - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800)252.2421 x128 / bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - BF1560 - "Logic, like whiskey, loses its beneficial effect when taken in too large quantities" -Lord Dunsany To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Sep 20 17:00:09 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA08204 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Sun, 20 Sep 1998 17:00:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from e-c.qc.ca (e-c.qc.ca [206.231.123.205]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA08014 for ; Sun, 20 Sep 1998 16:59:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cfortin@e-c.qc.ca) Received: (from cfortin@localhost) by e-c.qc.ca (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA09922; Sun, 20 Sep 1998 20:04:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from cfortin) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 20 Sep 1998 20:04:49 -0400 (EDT) Organization: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=C9lectro-Mecanik?= From: Christian Corneau To: "David E. Cross" Subject: RE: VPN under FreeBSD Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org You can use the SKIP on FreeBSD, it work fine. If you want to plug WinNT/Win95 on the SKIP server, you can buy SKIP from Sun. But you must buy the CD-ROM Version with a licence for USA/Canada. The "Internationnal Licence" is NOT compatible with SKIP on FreeBSD. The SKIP avalable for download on Sun web site is NOT compatible with SKIP on FreeBSD. Only the CD-ROM Version. Your choice of licence for W95/NT from Sun, who work with SKIP on FreeBSD: "Export-Controled" at 124$ and "Domestic-Only" at 149$ On 20-Sep-98 David E. Cross wrote: > I have looked breifly through the handbook, and did not see this > mentioned. I am looking to setup a VPN style interface under FreeBSD. It > seems it would be trivial to do using either DIVERT or TUN, has anyone > already done this? > > (Please cc me as I am not on this list) > -- > David Cross > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message ---------------------------------- E-Mail: Christian Corneau Date: 20-Sep-98 Heure: 19:53:51 ########################################-----+ Electro-Conception tel:(418) 872-6641 | 3665 Croisset fax:(418) 872-9198 | Quebec,P.Q. www.e-c.qc.ca | G1P-1L4 | /--|<|--WM--|(--J Canada ------------L---WM--< \----1 --- - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Sep 20 17:31:03 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA13132 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Sun, 20 Sep 1998 17:31:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from whistle.com (s205m131.whistle.com [207.76.205.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA13122 for ; Sun, 20 Sep 1998 17:30:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from archie@whistle.com) Received: (from smap@localhost) by whistle.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) id RAA09414; Sun, 20 Sep 1998 17:30:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bubba.whistle.com(207.76.205.7) by whistle.com via smap (V1.3) id sma009412; Sun Sep 20 17:30:03 1998 Received: (from archie@localhost) by bubba.whistle.com (8.8.7/8.6.12) id RAA03092; Sun, 20 Sep 1998 17:30:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Archie Cobbs Message-Id: <199809210030.RAA03092@bubba.whistle.com> Subject: Re: VPN under FreeBSD In-Reply-To: from "David E. Cross" at "Sep 20, 98 05:53:49 pm" To: crossd@cs.rpi.edu (David E. Cross) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 1998 17:30:02 -0700 (PDT) Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org David E. Cross writes: > I have looked breifly through the handbook, and did not see this > mentioned. I am looking to setup a VPN style interface under FreeBSD. It > seems it would be trivial to do using either DIVERT or TUN, has anyone > already done this? I think people have done that, but I don't remember the details. If you want full-blown public key cryptography and all that you might check out the SKIP port: /usr/ports/security/skip. -Archie ___________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Sep 20 19:57:38 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA06968 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Sun, 20 Sep 1998 19:57:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from allegro.lemis.com (allegro.lemis.com [192.109.197.134]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA06961 for ; Sun, 20 Sep 1998 19:57:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from grog@freebie.lemis.com) Received: from freebie.lemis.com (freebie.lemis.com [192.109.197.137]) by allegro.lemis.com (8.9.1/8.9.0) with ESMTP id MAA09873; Mon, 21 Sep 1998 12:27:02 +0930 (CST) Received: (from grog@localhost) by freebie.lemis.com (8.9.1/8.9.0) id MAA09154; Mon, 21 Sep 1998 12:26:58 +0930 (CST) Message-ID: <19980921122658.E8807@freebie.lemis.com> Date: Mon, 21 Sep 1998 12:26:58 +0930 From: Greg Lehey To: Karl Pielorz , Dale Phillips Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: increasing disk References: <3.0.3.32.19980914120318.00dfdd98@popd.ix.netcom.com> <35FE2311.EB0AADC8@tdx.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1i In-Reply-To: <35FE2311.EB0AADC8@tdx.co.uk>; from Karl Pielorz on Tue, Sep 15, 1998 at 09:19:29AM +0100 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.lemis.com/~grog Organization: LEMIS, PO Box 460, Echunga SA 5153, Australia Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-41-739-7062 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tuesday, 15 September 1998 at 9:19:29 +0100, Karl Pielorz wrote: > Dale Phillips wrote: > >> I am fuzzy on this point. >> >> can freebsd take 4 one gig scsi drives and >> merge/splice them to look like one 4 gig partition (mount point)? >> >> thanks >> Dale Phillips > > Yes, you can either use CCD, or Greg Lehey's Vinum volume manager (which is > currently in Alpha). I have CCD arrays and Vinum volumes running on my machine > at the moment... In fact (sorry I haven't announced it yet), Vinum is now in Beta, and will be in 3.0-RELEASE. Greg -- See complete headers for address, home page and phone numbers finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Sep 22 02:04:24 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA21907 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 02:04:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from kali.isicom.fr (kali.isicom.fr [194.98.30.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA21850 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 02:04:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ronald@groupe-fle.fr) Received: from chose (max3-36.DAN.NEU1.InetWAY.NET [194.98.47.228]) by kali.isicom.fr (8.8.8/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA03010 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 11:03:39 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <001b01bde607$e08df080$cec901c0@chose> Reply-To: "Ronald Van Assche" From: "Ronald Van Assche" To: Subject: Routing problem Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 11:03:10 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi folks, I have a simple problem to solve quickly on my network. They have 2 class C network, and we want to connect them via a FreeBSD gateway. So i build a box with two network cards , assigning each an ip adress in the correct class C, then configured the box (getway_enable=YES). But what do I have to do now ? The box has 2 cards, with 2 īp : 10.1.0.253 (1st network) and 10.2.0.253 (2nd network), and I have an internet routeur (with Nat) on 10.1.0.155. I want all people on 10.2.0.0 to be able to talk to the routeur, but it's only possible for them to ping 10.1.0.253, (it's their gateway ), no other adress is pingable . the FreeBSD box can ping the routeur, go to the net, ping the 2 class C without any problem, so what do i have to do ? Thanks To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Sep 22 08:42:25 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA25102 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 08:42:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from unix.kawartha.com (unix.kawartha.com [204.101.15.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA25088 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 08:42:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from paul@kawartha.com) Received: from shell.kawartha.com (shell.kawartha.com [204.101.15.43]) by unix.kawartha.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id LAA01621 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 11:46:17 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 12:11:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Paul Stewart To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: NFS questions.. dumb ones.. Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi there.. I'm trying to setup NFS on a series of FreeBSD boxes so that I can tar.gz them up remotely... been a long time since I've used NFS and it was on Linux... I've got the following on my exports file (www.kawartha.com): / -maproot=root:wheel proxy On the client side (proxy.kawartha.com) I'm typing: mount -t nfs -o -r=1024 proxy:/ /mnt I've enabled NFS server on www and NFS client on proxy in the rc.conf but I know I'm missing something. The error I'm getting is "program not registered" or similar... Thanks again, Paul To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Sep 22 08:54:44 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA27129 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 08:54:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pushkar.stepnet.com (pushkar.stepnet.com [206.14.120.103]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA27114 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 08:54:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ping@stepnet.com) Received: (from ping@localhost) by pushkar.stepnet.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA02712 for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 08:54:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ping) From: Ping Mai Message-Id: <199809221554.IAA02712@pushkar.stepnet.com> Subject: HELP: hacked by John the Ripper To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 08:54:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org It seems my system has been hacked. The hacker altered the DNS tables and left a passwd cracker in /bin. There were DNS db files that were invisible to "/bin/ls", but they show up from "od" dump of the directory. Can someone help me to find out how he got in initially? What should I do at this point? Should I wipe the disk on this system? Thansk in advance, ping To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Sep 22 09:46:30 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA07231 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 09:46:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from omni.xgen.net (omni.xgen.net [207.170.48.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA07050 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 09:46:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jade@fusetec.com) Received: from winky (winky.fusetec.com [209.83.35.23]) by omni.xgen.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA11443 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 11:45:14 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jade@fusetec.com) Reply-To: From: "Jade Spangenberg" To: Subject: Remote dump: Lost connection to remote host: Please help! Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 11:46:26 -0700 Message-ID: <000101bde659$4d5a8e20$172353d1@winky.fusetec.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Anyone have any ideas here? I'm really stuck! I'm trying to dump to tape from source.machine to tape.machine. tape.machine has a 4 Gig SCSI tape backup that works perfectly for local backups. source.machine is FreeBSD 2.2.6-stable and tape.machine is FreeBSD 2.2.7-stable. In order to do this, I've made the following mods: source.machine: /etc/hosts.equiv: tape.machine root /root/.rhosts: tape.machine root /root/.hushlogin tape.machine: /etc/hosts.equiv: source.machine root /root/.rhosts: source.machine root /root/.hushlogin I use this command from the source machine (as root): /sbin/dump 0unBf 3906250 tape.machine:/dev/nrst0 / and I get this in response: DUMP: Connection to tape.machine established. DUMP: Date of this level 0 dump: Thu Sep 17 10:01:59 1998 DUMP: Date of last level 0 dump: the epoch DUMP: Dumping /dev/rwd0s1a (/) to /dev/nrst0 on host tape.machine DUMP: mapping (Pass I) [regular files] DUMP: mapping (Pass II) [directories] DUMP: estimated 19785 tape blocks on 0.01 tape(s). DUMP: Lost connection to remote host. I started this process by RTFM. What am I missing?! Jade Fuse Technologies, Inc. http://www.fusetec.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Sep 22 10:20:28 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA14815 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 10:20:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from terror.hungry.com (terror.hungry.com [199.181.107.40]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA14737 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 10:20:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fn@hungry.com) Received: (qmail 12795 invoked by uid 507); 22 Sep 1998 17:19:41 -0000 To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HELP: hacked by John the Ripper References: <199809221554.IAA02712@pushkar.stepnet.com> From: Faried Nawaz Date: 22 Sep 1998 10:19:39 -0700 In-Reply-To: ping@stepnet.com's message of 22 Sep 1998 09:43:52 -0700 Message-ID: Lines: 16 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.37/XEmacs 19.16 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org ping@stepnet.com (Ping Mai) writes: It seems my system has been hacked. The hacker altered the DNS tables and left a passwd cracker in /bin. There were DNS db files that were invisible to "/bin/ls", but they show up from "od" dump of the directory. Can someone help me to find out how he got in initially? Can you display the files by going into the name directory and typing "echo *"? Can you read them via an editor? What should I do at this point? Should I wipe the disk on this system? If you're certain that you've been hacked, yes. How do you think they got in? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Sep 22 11:54:54 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA02966 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 11:54:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from oldyeller.comtest.com (comtest.hits.net [206.127.244.117]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA02945 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 11:54:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from randal@comtest.com) Received: from graphics.comtest.com (graphics.comtest.com [206.127.245.194]) by oldyeller.comtest.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA00284; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 08:41:49 -1000 (HST) (envelope-from randal@comtest.com) Message-Id: <199809221841.IAA00284@oldyeller.comtest.com> From: "Randal S. Masutani" Organization: ComTest Technologies, Inc. To: "Ronald Van Assche" , ronald@groupe-fle.fr, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 08:56:37 -1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: Routing problem Reply-to: randal@comtest.com In-reply-to: <001b01bde607$e08df080$cec901c0@chose> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v3.01b) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from Quoted-printable to 8bit by hub.freebsd.org id LAA02958 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 22 Sep 98, at 11:03, Ronald Van Assche wrote: > Hi folks, > > I have a simple problem to solve quickly on my network. > They have 2 class C network, and we want to connect them via a FreeBSD > gateway. > So i build a box with two network cards , assigning each an ip adress in the > correct class C, then configured the box (getway_enable=YES). > But what do I have to do now ? > The box has 2 cards, with 2 īp : 10.1.0.253 (1st network) and 10.2.0.253 > (2nd network), and I have an internet routeur (with Nat) on 10.1.0.155. > I want all people on 10.2.0.0 to be able to talk to the routeur, but it's > only possible for them to ping 10.1.0.253, (it's their gateway ), no other > adress is pingable . > the FreeBSD box can ping the routeur, go to the net, ping the 2 class C > without any problem, so what do i have to do ? > > Thanks Sound like you need to check your network MASK, you are trying to subnet your 10.0.0.0 network. The default mask for the 10.0.0.0 network is usually 255.0.0.0. You may need to subnet using the mask 255.255.0.0, because you have network 10.1.0.0 and network 10.2.0.0. Randal Masutani ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ComTest Technologies, Inc. 3049 Ualena St., Suite 1005 Honolulu, Hawaii 96819 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Sep 22 13:39:51 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA23642 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 13:39:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from peak.mountin.net ([207.227.119.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA23594 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 13:39:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jeff-ml@mountin.net) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by peak.mountin.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) id PAA26919; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 15:39:12 -0500 (CDT) Received: from luthien-20.isdn.mke.execpc.com(169.207.65.20) by peak.mountin.net via smap (V1.3) id sma026914; Tue Sep 22 15:38:47 1998 Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.19980922153742.00709094@207.227.119.2> X-Sender: jeff-ml@207.227.119.2 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.3 (32) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 15:37:42 -0500 To: Paul Stewart , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG From: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" Subject: Re: NFS questions.. dumb ones.. In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 12:11 PM 9/22/98 -0400, Paul Stewart wrote: >Hi there.. I'm trying to setup NFS on a series of FreeBSD boxes so that I >can tar.gz them up remotely... been a long time since I've used NFS and it >was on Linux... > >I've got the following on my exports file (www.kawartha.com): > >/ -maproot=root:wheel proxy > >On the client side (proxy.kawartha.com) I'm typing: > >mount -t nfs -o -r=1024 proxy:/ /mnt > >I've enabled NFS server on www and NFS client on proxy in the rc.conf but >I know I'm missing something. > >The error I'm getting is "program not registered" or similar... I'd guess from the error that you have portmap enabled. Make sure that portmap, mountd, and nfsd are running on the server. The client needs portmap and nfsiod. You most likely need to HUP mountd, which should be done after changing the /etc/exports file. A 'showmount -e' is helpful to check. Or it may be that portmap needs a HUP if it isn't aware of mountd. Been a while. Just curious why you are exporting the root, considering the security (or lack of) of that. Jeff Mountin - Unix Systems TCP/IP networking jeff@mountin.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Sep 22 13:44:41 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA25017 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 13:44:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from peak.mountin.net ([207.227.119.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA24902 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 13:44:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jeff-ml@mountin.net) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by peak.mountin.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) id PAA26929; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 15:43:42 -0500 (CDT) Received: from luthien-20.isdn.mke.execpc.com(169.207.65.20) by peak.mountin.net via smap (V1.3) id sma026925; Tue Sep 22 15:43:35 1998 Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.19980922154230.00702db4@207.227.119.2> X-Sender: jeff-ml@207.227.119.2 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.3 (32) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 15:42:30 -0500 To: Ping Mai , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG From: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" Subject: Re: HELP: hacked by John the Ripper In-Reply-To: <199809221554.IAA02712@pushkar.stepnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 08:54 AM 9/22/98 -0700, Ping Mai wrote: >It seems my system has been hacked. The hacker altered the DNS tables and >left a passwd cracker in /bin. There were DNS db files that were invisible >to "/bin/ls", but they show up from "od" dump of the directory. Can someone >help me to find out how he got in initially? What should I do at this point? >Should I wipe the disk on this system? I'd take the server offline and replace the drive the OS is on. This would allow you to check out the hack in detail, which you can then work on a solution and you have evidence. Good idea to send a message to CERT as well as possibly contacting the FBI, if it means enough to you. Otherwise wipe the disk and reinstall. If you have more than one disk, make sure that there are no other suprises waiting and screen what you save. Jeff Mountin - Unix Systems TCP/IP networking jeff@mountin.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Sep 22 16:36:55 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA29082 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 16:36:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from rucus.ru.ac.za (rucus.ru.ac.za [146.231.29.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id QAA29001 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 16:36:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nbm@rucus.ru.ac.za) Received: (qmail 19227 invoked by uid 1003); 22 Sep 1998 20:52:53 -0000 Message-ID: <19980922225253.A17697@rucus.ru.ac.za> Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 22:52:53 +0200 From: Neil Blakey-Milner To: Ping Mai , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HELP: hacked by John the Ripper References: <199809221554.IAA02712@pushkar.stepnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i In-Reply-To: <199809221554.IAA02712@pushkar.stepnet.com>; from Ping Mai on Tue, Sep 22, 1998 at 08:54:09AM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue 1998-09-22 (08:54), Ping Mai wrote: > It seems my system has been hacked. The hacker altered the DNS tables and > left a passwd cracker in /bin. There were DNS db files that were invisible > to "/bin/ls", but they show up from "od" dump of the directory. Can someone > help me to find out how he got in initially? What should I do at this point? > Should I wipe the disk on this system? It would help if you gave versions of FreeBSD, when last you made world, and so forth, but I think the two most likely are qpopper and bind, both of which were about 2/3 months(?) or so ago. At this stage, I'd recommend going to backups (you _do_ have backups, don't you?). If that's not an option, back up /home, /etc, pertinent bits of /var and /usr/local/etc, now, and then nuke the system, install a more recent version of FreeBSD (or install your previous one and cvsup to a newer version). You then have to go through the arduous task of checking your /etc and /var stuff for crontabs, and so forth, and updating to the new /etc format (depending on how old your FreeBSD install was), and then restoring /home. I think that's about it, really. It'd probably be in your best interest to bribe your local FreeBSD guru with lots of coke, chocolate and coffee and enlist his or her help in this. Neil -- Neil Blakey-Milner nbm@rucus.ru.ac.za To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Sep 22 21:10:15 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA23409 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 21:10:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.sheltonbbs.com (mail.sheltonbbs.com [206.196.109.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id VAA23319 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 21:09:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bbsadmin@sheltonbbs.com) Received: (qmail 21632 invoked by uid 2108); 23 Sep 1998 04:09:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO butch.sheltonbbs.com) (206.196.122.3) by mail.sheltonbbs.com with SMTP; 23 Sep 1998 04:09:51 -0000 Message-ID: <000b01bde6a7$db7d70c0$037ac4ce@butch.sheltonbbs.com> Reply-To: "Butch Evans" From: "Butch Evans" To: Subject: MRTG Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 23:08:44 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3115.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I am having trouble installing the mrtg-2.51 port. Actually, that port installed ok. I cannot get the (apparently necessary) p5-SNMP port to install correctly. I installed ucd-snmp and have a /usr/local/lib/libsnmp.so, but not libsnmp.a. The SNMP module requires the .a file. I am still pretty green here. What am I missing? FreeBSD 2.2.6 is the version I have. ******************************************************************* ** Butch Evans ** Visit our WebSite at ** ** Shelton Internet, Inc ** http://www.sheltonbbs.com ** ** Network Operations ** SEMO's Premier ISP ** ** Malden, MO ** Low, Low Ad Rates!! ** ** 1-800-339-4803 ** 573-276-4803 ** ******************************************************************** To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Sep 22 23:55:26 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA21634 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 23:55:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from stuka.avlnet.ml.org (hmo3-132.uninet.net.mx [200.38.204.132]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA21244 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 23:53:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from avarela@avlnet.ml.org) Received: from localhost (avarela@localhost) by stuka.avlnet.ml.org (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id AAA01200 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 00:52:57 -0600 Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 00:52:57 -0600 (MDT) From: Antonio Varela Lizardi To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Second ed0 In-Reply-To: <000b01bde6a7$db7d70c0$037ac4ce@butch.sheltonbbs.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Dear all, Maybe this should be posted in -questions, so apollogies in advance. The question is, how can I configure a second/third ethernet card? Thanks in advance --- Antonio Varela avarela@avlnet.ml.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Sep 23 00:11:31 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA24636 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 00:11:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from proxy.unpar.ac.id (proxy.unpar.ac.id [167.205.206.55]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA24607 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 00:11:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from 1193016@student.unpar.ac.id) Received: from student.unpar.ac.id (student.unpar.ac.id [10.210.1.3]) by proxy.unpar.ac.id (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA00740 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 13:26:25 +0700 (JAVT) Received: from localhost (1193016@localhost) by student.unpar.ac.id (8.9.1/8.9.0) with ESMTP id NAA21868 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 13:46:41 +0700 (JAVT) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 13:46:41 +0700 (JAVT) From: Thomas Wahyudi <1193016@student.unpar.ac.id> To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: network port all in use Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Could someone tell me how to void this message ? telnetd : All network port in use fyi: kernel compile with MAXUSER 256 this server acts web server, dns server all user must telnet to this server to use internet access actual user login when this message appear is no more than 30 user Best regard, from #### # Thomas Wahyudi UIN:535778 # # # # 1193016@student.unpar.ac.id # ## ## http://student.unpar.ac.id/~1193016 -=-=-=-=-=PARAHYANGAN UNIVERSITY=-=-=-=-=-=- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Sep 23 00:22:22 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA27104 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 00:22:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from shell6.ba.best.com (shell6.ba.best.com [206.184.139.137]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA27056 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 00:22:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkb@best.com) Received: from localhost (jkb@localhost) by shell6.ba.best.com (8.9.0/8.9.0/best.sh) with SMTP id AAA11262; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 00:22:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: shell6.ba.best.com: jkb owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 00:22:07 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jan B. Koum " X-Sender: jkb@shell6.ba.best.com To: Antonio Varela Lizardi cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Second ed0 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Yes, this should go to questions, but here is your answer anyway: in kernel add: device ep1 at isa? port YOUR_PORT net irq YOUR_IRQ vector epintr device ep2 at isa? port YOUR_PORT net irq YOUR_IRQ vector epintr where YOUR_PORT and YOUR_IRQ are the ports and irq's for those cards. And don't forget to edit your /etc/rc.conf and add entries for ep1 and ep2. -- Yan I don't have the password .... + Jan Koum But the path is chainlinked .. | Spelled Jan, pronounced Yan. There. So if you've got the time .... | Web: http://www.best.com/~jkb Set the tone to sync ......... + OS: http://www.FreeBSD.org On Wed, 23 Sep 1998, Antonio Varela Lizardi wrote: >Dear all, > Maybe this should be posted in -questions, so apollogies in advance. The >question is, how can I configure a second/third ethernet card? > >Thanks in advance >--- >Antonio Varela >avarela@avlnet.ml.org > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Sep 23 00:58:17 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA04352 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 00:58:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from escape.rtsnet.ru (escape.rtsnet.ru [194.247.132.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA04263 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 00:57:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from igor@rtsnet.ru) Received: from ndns.rtsnet.ru (ns.rtsnet.ru [194.247.133.3] (may be forged)) by escape.rtsnet.ru (8.8.8/8.8.8/Zynaps) with ESMTP id LAA29028 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 11:57:49 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from igor@rtsnet.ru) Received: from shogun.rtsnet.ru (shogun.rtsnet.ru [172.16.37.32]) by ndns.rtsnet.ru (8.8.8/8.8.8/Zynaps) with ESMTP id LAA18067 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 11:57:49 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from igor@rtsnet.ru) Received: (from igor@localhost) by shogun.rtsnet.ru (8.8.8/8.8.8/Zynaps) id LAA03755 for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 11:57:48 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from igor) Message-ID: <19980923115748.C3511@rtsnet.ru> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 11:57:48 +0400 From: Igor Vinokurov To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: console server Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello. I would like if someone suggest me how I can construct FreeBSD based console server for our colocation service (I have several multiport serial cards supported by FreeBSD). -- Igor Vinokurov To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Sep 23 01:28:50 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA09377 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 01:28:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gjp.erols.com (alex-va-n008c079.moon.jic.com [206.156.18.89]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA09363 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 01:28:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gjp@gjp.erols.com) Received: from gjp.erols.com (gjp@localhost.erols.com [127.0.0.1]) by gjp.erols.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA18134; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 04:26:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gjp@gjp.erols.com) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.1 12/23/97 To: Thomas Wahyudi <1193016@student.unpar.ac.id> cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG From: "Gary Palmer" Subject: Re: network port all in use In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 23 Sep 1998 13:46:41 +0700." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 04:26:55 -0400 Message-ID: <18130.906539215@gjp.erols.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Thomas Wahyudi wrote in message ID : > Could someone tell me how to void this message ? > > telnetd : All network port in use Increase the number of PTY's in /dev, and edit /etc/ttys to add them there. Gary -- Gary Palmer FreeBSD Core Team Member FreeBSD: Turning PC's into workstations. See http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/ for info To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Sep 23 10:18:36 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA04553 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 10:18:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from artorius.sunflower.com (artorius.sunflower.com [24.124.0.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA04536 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 10:18:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bsd-isp@artorius.sunflower.com) Received: from artorius.sunflower.com (artorius.sunflower.com [24.124.0.6]) by artorius.sunflower.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id MAA10640; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 12:18:02 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bsd-isp@artorius.sunflower.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 12:18:02 -0500 (CDT) From: "Stephen D. Spencer" To: Andreas Klemm cc: frank segner , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: INN 1.7.2 & Device Not Configured error In-Reply-To: <19980920121959.A13027@klemm.gtn.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 20 Sep 1998, Andreas Klemm wrote: > > Is there a certain reason, why 2.1 is available since July 98 > and the information on the webserver still is based on 2.0 and > pointing to snapshot releases ? > --abjectly unoffical commentary mode ON-- I ran 2.1 for about 3 weeks until the number of complaints about timeouts on XOVER forced me to return to 1.7.2. I have continued, however, to follow the isc mailing list on what's been going on with 2.1 "release". Though it was called a "release" version, it appears that that label has been grain-of-salted as most of the traffic concerning fixes and whatnot have concerned the development snapshots. 2.1 will actually compile (whereas there are problems with 2.0 at that stage); however, the functionality issues are such that it would be impossible to keep a port for INN 2 current and working. There were a couple times when I was following the snap tree that the configuration files changed. It will be a fine work once it is completed, but the folks working on it need more time. At that time it will hopefully be ready for production level servers. --abjectly unoffical commentary mode OFF-- Regards, Stephen --------------------------------------------------------------------- - Stephen Spencer finger gladiatr@artorius.sunflower.com for - - administrator PGP key. - - Sunflower Datavision http://www.sunflower.com - --------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Sep 23 11:07:22 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA13042 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 11:07:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from amber.eaznet.com (amber.eaznet.com [216.19.20.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA13031 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 11:07:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eddie@eaznet.com) Received: from eaznet.com (admin.eaznet.com [216.19.20.16]) by amber.eaznet.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA22946; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 11:10:16 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <360938BE.3569E424@eaznet.com> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 11:06:54 -0700 From: Eddie Fry X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.06 [en] (Win95; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: randal@comtest.com CC: Ronald Van Assche , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Routing problem References: <199809221841.IAA00284@oldyeller.comtest.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Randal, Ronald says he has 2 class C's so his mask should be 255.255.255.0. Eddie Randal S. Masutani wrote: > On 22 Sep 98, at 11:03, Ronald Van Assche wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > I have a simple problem to solve quickly on my network. > > They have 2 class C network, and we want to connect them via a FreeBSD > > gateway. > > So i build a box with two network cards , assigning each an ip adress in the > > correct class C, then configured the box (getway_enable=YES). > > But what do I have to do now ? > > The box has 2 cards, with 2 īp : 10.1.0.253 (1st network) and 10.2.0.253 > > (2nd network), and I have an internet routeur (with Nat) on 10.1.0.155. > > I want all people on 10.2.0.0 to be able to talk to the routeur, but it's > > only possible for them to ping 10.1.0.253, (it's their gateway ), no other > > adress is pingable . > > the FreeBSD box can ping the routeur, go to the net, ping the 2 class C > > without any problem, so what do i have to do ? > > > > Thanks > > Sound like you need to check your network MASK, you are trying to subnet > your 10.0.0.0 network. The default mask for the 10.0.0.0 network is > usually 255.0.0.0. You may need to subnet using the mask 255.255.0.0, > because you have network 10.1.0.0 and network 10.2.0.0. > > Randal Masutani > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ComTest Technologies, Inc. > 3049 Ualena St., Suite 1005 > Honolulu, Hawaii 96819 > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message -- Eddie Fry EAZNet Internet Services To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Sep 23 11:17:36 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA14789 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 11:17:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from web-it-show.com (dns1.web-it-show.com [207.99.25.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA14771 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 11:17:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from postmaster@web-it-show.com) Received: from web-it-show.com ([207.99.25.33]) by web-it-show.com with ESMTP (IPAD 2.07) id 5179700 ; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 14:21:03 -0400 Message-ID: <36093B23.889BFAB7@web-it-show.com> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 14:17:13 -0400 From: System Administrator Organization: Web-It Show, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (WinNT; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Butch Evans , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: MRTG References: <000b01bde6a7$db7d70c0$037ac4ce@butch.sheltonbbs.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I remember that problem... I can't remember the exact file, but just change the makefile (or was it the config file) that refers to it. Change the .a suffix to .so and it will work find! Butch Evans wrote: > I am having trouble installing the mrtg-2.51 port. Actually, that port > installed ok. I cannot get the (apparently necessary) p5-SNMP port to > install correctly. I installed ucd-snmp and have a > /usr/local/lib/libsnmp.so, but not libsnmp.a. The SNMP module requires the > .a file. I am still pretty green here. What am I missing? > > FreeBSD 2.2.6 is the version I have. > > ******************************************************************* > ** Butch Evans ** Visit our WebSite at ** > ** Shelton Internet, Inc ** http://www.sheltonbbs.com ** > ** Network Operations ** SEMO's Premier ISP ** > ** Malden, MO ** Low, Low Ad Rates!! ** > ** 1-800-339-4803 ** 573-276-4803 ** > ******************************************************************** > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message -- Henry Web-It Show, Inc. (609) 890-9227 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Sep 23 11:31:30 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA17333 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 11:31:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from rainey.blueneptune.com (rainey.blueneptune.com [209.133.45.253]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA17267 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 11:31:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from michael@rainey.blueneptune.com) Received: (from michael@localhost) by rainey.blueneptune.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) id LAA27249; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 11:29:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from michael) Message-Id: <199809231829.LAA27249@rainey.blueneptune.com> Subject: Re: network port all in use In-Reply-To: from Thomas Wahyudi at "Sep 23, 98 01:46:41 pm" To: 1193016@student.unpar.ac.id (Thomas Wahyudi) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 11:29:50 -0700 (PDT) Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG From: michael@blueneptune.com Reply-To: michael@blueneptune.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Could someone tell me how to void this message ? > > telnetd : All network port in use You have run out of ptys (pseudo terminals). You can increase this with the following line in your kernel configuration file: pseudo-device pty NN replacing NN with some number, usually a multiple of 32. Rebuild the kernel, and you'll have that many ptys available. I believe the absolute maximum you can have is 256. You need one pty for every telnet session. Other programs (such as emacs) can also use ptys. So be sure you have enough for your maximum needed number of logins, plus some slack. You will also need to make sure you make the appropriate files in /dev. Use "MAKEDEV ptyN", where "N" is "0" through "7", to make the following device nodes in sets of 32: pty0: /dev/ttyp[0-v], /dev/ptyp[0-v] pty1: /dev/ttyq[0-v], /dev/ptyq[0-v] pty2: /dev/ttyr[0-v], /dev/ptyr[0-v] pty3: /dev/ttys[0-v], /dev/ptys[0-v] pty4: /dev/ttyP[0-v], /dev/ptyP[0-v] pty5: /dev/ttyQ[0-v], /dev/ptyQ[0-v] pty6: /dev/ttyR[0-v], /dev/ptyR[0-v] pty7: /dev/ttyS[0-v], /dev/ptyS[0-v] For example, if you specify 128 ptys in the kernel, be sure you have the device nodes made for pty0 through pty3. > fyi: kernel compile with MAXUSER 256 That should be more than enough. -- Michael Bryan michael@blueneptune.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Sep 23 12:31:14 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA27953 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 12:31:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from panzer.plutotech.com (panzer.plutotech.com [206.168.67.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA27927 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 12:31:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ken@panzer.plutotech.com) Received: (from ken@localhost) by panzer.plutotech.com (8.9.1/8.8.5) id NAA23923; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 13:30:33 -0600 (MDT) From: "Kenneth D. Merry" Message-Id: <199809231930.NAA23923@panzer.plutotech.com> Subject: Re: console server In-Reply-To: <19980923115748.C3511@rtsnet.ru> from Igor Vinokurov at "Sep 23, 98 11:57:48 am" To: igor@rtsnet.ru (Igor Vinokurov) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 13:30:33 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28s (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Igor Vinokurov wrote... > Hello. > > I would like if someone suggest me how I can construct FreeBSD > based console server for our colocation service (I have several > multiport serial cards supported by FreeBSD). Branson Matheson did a talk and paper on FreeBSD console servers at the USENIX conference in June. See: http://www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceedings/usenix98/freenix/matheson.ps Ken -- Kenneth Merry ken@plutotech.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Sep 23 16:54:56 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA11450 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 16:54:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from etinc.com (et-gw.etinc.com [207.252.1.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA11440 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 16:54:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dennis@etinc.com) Received: from dbsys (dbsys.etinc.com [207.252.1.18]) by etinc.com (8.8.8/8.6.9) with SMTP id TAA00389; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 19:52:05 GMT Message-Id: <199809231952.TAA00389@etinc.com> X-Sender: dennis@etinc.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0 Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 20:06:09 -0400 To: Julian Elischer , Ray Bellis From: Dennis Subject: Re: Load balancing across 2 E1s? Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: References: <004501bdb3fc$82f0edc0$1aa148c3@rpb.community.net.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Our product incorporates load balancing on multiple T1/E1 lines as a standard feature. dennis At 11:31 AM 7/20/98 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: >you can look in the archives ('net' mailing list) for references to the >'mpath' patches.. > >julian >(thye may not apply totally cleanly due to some checnges in FreeBSD since >then, but they should bo 99% what you need) > >julian > >On Mon, 20 Jul 1998, Ray Bellis wrote: > >> I've an application where a customer wants to connect together two networks with a microwave link, where the microwave >> link is terminated as two G.703 E1 (2Mbps) circuits in parallel. I hope to use G.703 to X.21 convertors to interface >> the circuits to PCI synchronous cards in a system running FreeBSD. >> >> Is it possible to make FreeBSD load balance across the two circuits to give the expected 4Mbps circuit, or will I need >> to use hardware muxes (and then find a 4Mbps G.703 to V.35 convertor)? >> >> thanks, >> >> Ray. >> >> -- >> Ray Bellis, MA(Oxon) - Technical Director - Oxford CommUnity Internet plc >> Windsor House, 12 High Street, Kidlington, OXFORD OX5 2PJ UK >> Telephone: +44-1865-856000 Fax: +44-1865-856001 >> Email: ray.bellis@community.net.uk URL: http://www.community.co.uk/ >> >> >> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >> with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message >> > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Sep 23 19:05:18 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA00704 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 19:05:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from magicnet.magicnet.net (magicnet.magicnet.net [204.96.116.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA00669 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 19:05:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bill@bilver.magicnet.net) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by magicnet.magicnet.net (8.8.6/8.8.8) with UUCP id WAA09490 for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 22:02:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from bill@localhost) by bilver.magicnet.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) id VAA29188 for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 21:48:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Vermillion Message-Id: <199809240148.VAA29188@bilver.magicnet.net> Subject: Re: Routing problem In-Reply-To: <360938BE.3569E424@eaznet.com> from Eddie Fry at "Sep 23, 98 11:06:54 am" To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 21:48:10 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Eddie Fry recently said: > Randal, > > Ronald says he has 2 class C's so his mask should be 255.255.255.0. He says he has two class C's but he's using class A addressing. Shouldn't the netmask really be 254.0.0.0 ? That way it will supernet the 10.1 and the 10.2 into two parallel blocks out of address.. 10.1 thru 10.2. I know you can't use the 1 bit mask in the subnetting a c because it will give a network address and a mask with nothing in between. Will a 254.0.0.0 set it up so that 10.1.0.0 is the base and 10.2.255.255 is the broadcast. Or have I TOTALLY screwed up my understanding of how this works? There are days when a hand-cranked phone would be easier to deal with. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Sep 23 22:52:56 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA04184 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 22:52:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from joshua.enteract.com (joshua.enteract.com [207.229.129.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id WAA04178 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 22:52:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from djhoward@joshua.enteract.com) Received: (qmail 11926 invoked by uid 1032); 24 Sep 1998 05:52:50 -0000 Message-ID: <19980924005250.F9091@enteract.com> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 1998 00:52:50 -0500 From: Dan Howard - EnterAct Admin Team To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: adding users to populous systems Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i X-Loop: djhoward@uiuc.edu X-URL: http://www.dannyland.org/~dannyman/ Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org We have a busy shell machine available to our customers that runs a great many services and has over 14000 user accounts. Over the past month, I've been involved in overhauling bits and pieces of the system involved in adding new users into the system. For a long time, we'd been running an old version of the standard adduser script, hacked in very scary ways by various persons who've been in charge of the system for the past two years. It was prone to breakage, and was scary to maintain, so I scrapped it and wrote our own version, which uses pw. I've observed that stuff like adduser, pwd_mkdb, and even pw, are not particularly suited to running in this environment. Why? 1) Race conditions involved with either of the first two regarding multiple copies being used at a time. (We have several employees adding users every day.) 2) A preference for rebuilding the entire password database once a user is added. A few things we've done are: - Wrap pwd_mkdb with lockf so it'll only run one at a time - it can be invoked several times, but those invocations will block and complete serially. - Hack pw so that it doesn't rebuild the database. After the new script runs pw, it calls pwd_mkdb -u. Even so, I notice that pw likes to make certain assumptions, such as that the password environment it's working in reflects accurately the state of the passwd file it's editing - this means that until I put a lock around pw -> pwd_mkdb -u, that some duplicate UIDs were appearing on accasion. I think pw is a cool program though, and keep thinking that some spare time should be devoted to getting it, and possibly pwd_mkdb to act in a different manner - the former rebuilding the database more conservatively, and the latter not running over itself, as other utilities like passwd, chfn, et al, manage to do. Before I start getting too intimate with some rather sober and serious code there, I was wondering if anyone else has been involved with this sort of stuff too, and hopefully has certain suggestions or insight they might share? Thanks! -danny -- Dan Howard, EnterAct System Administration Team || EnterAct: Top-rated http://www.dannyland.org/~dannyman/ || ISP in Illinois To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Sep 24 01:41:25 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA25300 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Thu, 24 Sep 1998 01:41:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from proxy.grad.kiev.ua (grad-UTC-28k8.ukrtel.net [195.5.25.54]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA25292 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 1998 01:41:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ruslan@Shevchenko.Kiev.UA) Received: from Shevchenko.Kiev.UA (cam [10.0.0.50]) by proxy.grad.kiev.ua (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA06751; Thu, 24 Sep 1998 11:41:55 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from Ruslan@Shevchenko.Kiev.UA) Message-ID: <360A045E.E926E051@Shevchenko.Kiev.UA> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 1998 11:35:42 +0300 From: Ruslan Shevchenko Reply-To: rssh@grad.kiev.ua X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.5-STABLE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Howard - EnterAct Admin Team CC: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: adding users to populous systems References: <19980924005250.F9091@enteract.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Dan Howard - EnterAct Admin Team wrote: > > We have a busy shell machine available to our customers that runs a great many > services and has over 14000 user accounts. > > Over the past month, I've been involved in overhauling bits and pieces of the > system involved in adding new users into the system. For a long time, we'd > been running an old version of the standard adduser script, hacked in very > scary ways by various persons who've been in charge of the system for the > past two years. It was prone to breakage, and was scary to maintain, so I > scrapped it and wrote our own version, which uses pw. > > I've observed that stuff like adduser, pwd_mkdb, and even pw, are not > particularly suited to running in this environment. Why? 1) Race conditions > involved with either of the first two regarding multiple copies being used at > a time. (We have several employees adding users every day.) 2) A preference > for rebuilding the entire password database once a user is added. > > A few things we've done are: > > - Wrap pwd_mkdb with lockf so it'll only run one at a time - it can be invoked > several times, but those invocations will block and complete serially. > > - Hack pw so that it doesn't rebuild the database. After the new script runs > pw, it calls pwd_mkdb -u. > > Even so, I notice that pw likes to make certain assumptions, such as that the > password environment it's working in reflects accurately the state of the > passwd file it's editing - this means that until I put a lock around pw -? > pwd_mkdb -u, that some duplicate UIDs were appearing on accasion. > > I think pw is a cool program though, and keep thinking that some spare time > should be devoted to getting it, and possibly pwd_mkdb to act in a different > manner - the former rebuilding the database more conservatively, and the > latter not running over itself, as other utilities like passwd, chfn, et al, > manage to do. > > Before I start getting too intimate with some rather sober and serious code > there, I was wondering if anyone else has been involved with this sort of > stuff too, and hopefully has certain suggestions or insight they might share? > few monthes ego I wrote X and HTML tool for adding/deleting users and groups. It work with set of users in memory, than use pwd_mkdb for a generating of passwd files, locking it before. All *semantic* work is doing in C++ core, all *GUI* is writeln in TCL. add yet another interface (I mean tewxtual) would be very simple. This tools is work good for our internal network. For a pity, I'm very busy now and have no time for extensive testing it before release. I will be happy, if you will grab the sources (http://cam.grad.kiev.ua/~rssh/admin/admin.html) and will use it as start point. Please, contact me for any additional questions. > Thanks! > > -danny > > -- > Dan Howard, EnterAct System Administration Team || EnterAct: Top-rated > http://www.dannyland.org/~dannyman/ || ISP in Illinois > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message -- @= //RSSH mailto:Ruslan@Shevchenko.Kiev.UA CORBA in Ukraine & ex-USSR: http://www.corbadev.kiev.ua To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Sep 24 07:01:00 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA03478 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Thu, 24 Sep 1998 07:01:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.keyworld.net (mail.keyworld.net [194.21.164.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA03465 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 1998 07:00:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mailing@keyworld.net) Received: from scanner.keyworld.net (scanner.keyworld.net [194.21.164.17]) by mail.keyworld.net (8.8.5/8.8.4) with SMTP id PAA20517 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 1998 15:51:40 +0200 Message-ID: <000b01bde7c3$d1f25300$11a415c2@scanner.keyworld.net> From: "KeyWORLD" To: Subject: nic support Date: Thu, 24 Sep 1998 16:01:25 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0008_01BDE7D4.94E41320" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0008_01BDE7D4.94E41320 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable hi there, anyone knows if the Intel Pro 100 PCI 8460 OEM is 100% supported by = FreeBSD kind regards, Nicholas Aquilina ------=_NextPart_000_0008_01BDE7D4.94E41320 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
hi there,
 
anyone knows if the Intel Pro 100 = PCI 8460 OEM=20 is 100% supported by FreeBSD
 
kind regards,
 
Nicholas Aquilina
 
------=_NextPart_000_0008_01BDE7D4.94E41320-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Sep 24 08:10:52 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA13290 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Thu, 24 Sep 1998 08:10:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from carp.gbr.epa.gov (carp.gbr.epa.gov [204.46.159.110]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA13269 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 1998 08:10:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mjenkins@carp.gbr.epa.gov) Received: (from mjenkins@localhost) by carp.gbr.epa.gov (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA11221; Thu, 24 Sep 1998 10:09:09 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from mjenkins) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 1998 10:09:09 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Jenkins Message-Id: <199809241509.KAA11221@carp.gbr.epa.gov> To: bill@bilver.magicnet.net Subject: Re: Routing problem Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199809240148.VAA29188@bilver.magicnet.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 23 Sep 1998 Bill Vermillion wrote: > Or have I TOTALLY screwed up my understanding of how this works? Maybe a picture will help. I believe he is using 255.255.0.0 for the netmasks. 10.1.0.0/16 10.2.0.0/16 Internet-----[NAT router]-------------------[freebsd]------------------ 10.1.0.155 10.1.0.253 10.2.0.253 If the router is using 255.255.0.0 for the netmask then it only knows about network 10.1.0.0 and will have to be told about network 10.2.0.0 by adding a route for 10.2.0.0 with 10.1.0.253 as the gateway. If the router is using 255.0.0.0 for the netmask then it thinks all of network 10.0.0.0 is on the ethernet but can't reach 10.2.0.0 hosts. Using the arpproxy_all="YES" option in /etc/rc.conf should fix it. Mike On Tue, 22 Sep 1998 Ronald Van Assche wrote: > I have a simple problem to solve quickly on my network. > They have 2 class C network, and we want to connect them via a FreeBSD > gateway. > So i build a box with two network cards , assigning each an ip adress in the > correct class C, then configured the box (getway_enable=YES). > But what do I have to do now ? > The box has 2 cards, with 2 īp : 10.1.0.253 (1st network) and 10.2.0.253 > (2nd network), and I have an internet routeur (with Nat) on 10.1.0.155. > I want all people on 10.2.0.0 to be able to talk to the routeur, but it's > only possible for them to ping 10.1.0.253, (it's their gateway ), no other > adress is pingable . > the FreeBSD box can ping the routeur, go to the net, ping the 2 class C > without any problem, so what do i have to do ? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Sep 24 10:33:35 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA07651 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Thu, 24 Sep 1998 10:33:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from bangkok.office.cdsnet.net (bangkok.office.cdsnet.net [204.118.245.23]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA07646 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 1998 10:33:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cts@bangkok.office.cdsnet.net) Received: (from cts@localhost) by bangkok.office.cdsnet.net (8.8.8/8.8.5) id KAA17147; Thu, 24 Sep 1998 10:33:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 1998 10:33:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199809241733.KAA17147@bangkok.office.cdsnet.net> X-Authentication-Warning: bangkok.office.cdsnet.net: cts set sender to cts@bangkok.office.cdsnet.net using -f MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Craig Spannring To: Dan Howard - EnterAct Admin Team Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: adding users to populous systems In-Reply-To: <19980924005250.F9091@enteract.com> References: <19980924005250.F9091@enteract.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.31 under Emacs 20.3.1 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org How old is your pw? A race condition was reported and fixed in PR bin/6787 (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=6787). The patches went into -stable and -current on July 16th or so. As far as pwd_mkdb taking too long you might try to increase the cache size that it uses. Doing that reduced our password file rebuild times from a minute or so down to a second to two. -- ======================================================================= Life is short. | Craig Spannring Ski hard, Bike fast. | cts@internetcds.com --------------------------------+------------------------------------ Any sufficiently perverted technology is indistinguishable from Perl. ======================================================================= To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Sep 24 15:08:51 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA25925 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Thu, 24 Sep 1998 15:08:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from Gatekeeper.Alameda.net (gatekeeper.Alameda.net [207.90.181.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA25919 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 1998 15:08:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ulf@Gatekeeper.Alameda.net) Received: by Gatekeeper.Alameda.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id PAA27052; Thu, 24 Sep 1998 15:08:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <19980924150846.C24890@Alameda.net> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 1998 15:08:46 -0700 From: Ulf Zimmermann To: Bill Vermillion , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Routing problem Reply-To: ulf@Alameda.net References: <360938BE.3569E424@eaznet.com> <199809240148.VAA29188@bilver.magicnet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1i In-Reply-To: <199809240148.VAA29188@bilver.magicnet.net>; from Bill Vermillion on Wed, Sep 23, 1998 at 09:48:10PM -0400 Organization: Alameda Networks, Inc. X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 2.2.6-STABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Sep 23, 1998 at 09:48:10PM -0400, Bill Vermillion wrote: > Eddie Fry recently said: > > Randal, > > > > Ronald says he has 2 class C's so his mask should be 255.255.255.0. > > He says he has two class C's but he's using class A addressing. > > Shouldn't the netmask really be 254.0.0.0 ? That way it will > supernet the 10.1 and the 10.2 into two parallel blocks out of > address.. 10.1 thru 10.2. 254 would give you a supernet which includes 10.0.0.0/8 and 11.0.0.0/8. > > I know you can't use the 1 bit mask in the subnetting a c because > it will give a network address and a mask with nothing in between. > > Will a 254.0.0.0 set it up so that 10.1.0.0 is the base and > 10.2.255.255 is the broadcast. To do that, the netmask would be 255.252.0.0, but that would include 10.0.0.0/16, 10.1.0.0/16, 10.2.0.0/16 and 10.3.0.0/16, so the broadcast would be 10.3.255.255 > > Or have I TOTALLY screwed up my understanding of how this works? Yes, you do. > > There are days when a hand-cranked phone would be easier to deal > with. > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message -- Regards, Ulf. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Ulf Zimmermann, 1525 Pacific Ave., Alameda, CA-94501, #: 510-769-2936 Alameda Networks, Inc. | http://www.Alameda.net | Fax#: 510-521-5073 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Sep 24 17:23:26 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA19222 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Thu, 24 Sep 1998 17:23:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from magicnet.magicnet.net (magicnet.magicnet.net [204.96.116.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA19203 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 1998 17:23:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bill@bilver.magicnet.net) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by magicnet.magicnet.net (8.8.6/8.8.8) with UUCP id UAA06323 for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Thu, 24 Sep 1998 20:23:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from bill@localhost) by bilver.magicnet.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) id UAA11898 for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Thu, 24 Sep 1998 20:05:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Vermillion Message-Id: <199809250005.UAA11898@bilver.magicnet.net> Subject: Re: Routing problem In-Reply-To: <199809241509.KAA11221@carp.gbr.epa.gov> from Mike Jenkins at "Sep 24, 98 10:09:09 am" To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Thu, 24 Sep 1998 20:05:34 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Mike Jenkins recently said: > On Wed, 23 Sep 1998 Bill Vermillion wrote: > > > Or have I TOTALLY screwed up my understanding of how this works? > Maybe a picture will help. I believe he is using 255.255.0.0 for > the netmasks. > > 10.1.0.0/16 10.2.0.0/16 > Internet-----[NAT router]-------------------[freebsd]------------------ > 10.1.0.155 10.1.0.253 10.2.0.253 > If the router is using 255.255.0.0 for the netmask then it only knows > about network 10.1.0.0 and will have to be told about network 10.2.0.0 > by adding a route for 10.2.0.0 with 10.1.0.253 as the gateway. > If the router is using 255.0.0.0 for the netmask then it thinks all of > network 10.0.0.0 is on the ethernet but can't reach 10.2.0.0 hosts. > Using the arpproxy_all="YES" option in /etc/rc.conf should fix it. Thanks. I's logical. I think I understand that. But what wrote was truly screwy. Bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Sep 25 06:00:57 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA28464 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 06:00:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from xwin.webweaver.net (xwin.webweaver.net [208.138.29.35]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA28458; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 06:00:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nicole@xwin.webweaver.net) Received: by xwin.webweaver.net (VMailer, from userid 1001) id E3DFE16812; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 05:01:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.2 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 05:01:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Nicole To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: PID killed, exceeeded maximum CPU limit... Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by hub.freebsd.org id GAA28459 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Please forgive the Niaveness of this question, and my poor spelling at 5:50 in the morning, but what usually causes something to exceed the CPU limit and what CPU limit is the message below probobly refering too. How can I prevent this? Sep 25 04:45:00 test2 /kernel: pid 137 (inetd), uid 0, was killed: exceeded maximum CPU limit Thanks Nicole nicole@webweaver.net - http://www.webweaver.net/ webmistress@dangermouse.org - http://www.dangermouse.org/ ------------------------------------------------- -- Powered by Coka Cola and FreeBSD -- - Stong enough for a man - But made for a Woman -- -- Microsoft: What bug would you like today? -- - I tried an internal modem once, but it hurt when I walked -- --------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Sep 25 08:07:40 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA13933 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 08:07:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from implode.root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA13913; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 08:07:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from root@implode.root.com) Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA24807; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 08:08:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199809251508.IAA24807@implode.root.com> To: Nicole cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PID killed, exceeeded maximum CPU limit... In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 25 Sep 1998 05:01:24 PDT." From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 08:08:22 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Please forgive the Niaveness of this question, and my poor spelling at 5:50 in >the morning, but what usually causes something to exceed the CPU limit and what >CPU limit is the message below probobly refering too. How can I prevent this? > > >Sep 25 04:45:00 test2 /kernel: pid 137 (inetd), uid 0, was killed: exceeded >maximum CPU limit ...a bug in the FreeBSD clock/accounting code that causes it to come up with negative numbers sometimes. I believe this has been fixed - what are you running on the machine? -DG David Greenman Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Sep 25 08:59:35 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA22173 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 08:59:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gwdu60.gwdg.de (gwdu60.gwdg.de [134.76.10.60]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA22124; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 08:59:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kheuer@gwdu60.gwdg.de) Received: from localhost (kheuer@localhost) by gwdu60.gwdg.de (8.9.0/8.9.0) with SMTP id RAA03349; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 17:58:55 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 17:58:55 +0200 (CEST) From: Konrad Heuer To: Nicole cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PID killed, exceeeded maximum CPU limit... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 25 Sep 1998, Nicole wrote: > Please forgive the Niaveness of this question, and my poor spelling at > 5:50 in the morning, but what usually causes something to exceed the CPU > limit and what CPU limit is the message below probobly refering too. How > can I prevent this? > > Sep 25 04:45:00 test2 /kernel: pid 137 (inetd), uid 0, was killed: > exceeded maximum CPU limit Sounds strange. Normally there should no CPU time limit for the daemon processes. Please check login class "daemon" in "/etc/login.conf". The corresponding entry should be ":cputime=infinity:". If nothings works insert the line ulimit -t unlimited at the beginning of your "/etc/rc" file. But before doing that ypu should ask yourself how "inetd" has been started before. May be someone knowing the root password started "inetd" manually after problems from a shell with a CPU time limit set? Ok, the pid is small, so that's unlikely, but ... Konrad Heuer // Gesellschaft fuer wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung mbH // Goettingen (GWDG), Am Fassberg, D-37077 Goettingen, Germany // // kheuer@gwdu60.gwdg.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Sep 25 10:18:50 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA04091 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 10:18:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from peak.mountin.net (peak.mountin.net [207.227.119.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA04081 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 10:18:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jeff-ml@mountin.net) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by peak.mountin.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) id MAA05690; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 12:17:37 -0500 (CDT) Received: from harkol-12.isdn.mke.execpc.com(169.207.64.140) by peak.mountin.net via smap (V1.3) id sma005688; Fri Sep 25 12:17:26 1998 Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.19980925121618.00714074@207.227.119.2> X-Sender: jeff-ml@207.227.119.2 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.3 (32) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 12:16:18 -0500 To: ulf@Alameda.net, Bill Vermillion , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG From: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" Subject: Re: Routing problem In-Reply-To: <19980924150846.C24890@Alameda.net> References: <199809240148.VAA29188@bilver.magicnet.net> <360938BE.3569E424@eaznet.com> <199809240148.VAA29188@bilver.magicnet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 03:08 PM 9/24/98 -0700, Ulf Zimmermann wrote: >On Wed, Sep 23, 1998 at 09:48:10PM -0400, Bill Vermillion wrote: >> Eddie Fry recently said: >> > Randal, >> > >> > Ronald says he has 2 class C's so his mask should be 255.255.255.0. >> >> He says he has two class C's but he's using class A addressing. >> >> Shouldn't the netmask really be 254.0.0.0 ? That way it will >> supernet the 10.1 and the 10.2 into two parallel blocks out of >> address.. 10.1 thru 10.2. > >254 would give you a supernet which includes 10.0.0.0/8 and 11.0.0.0/8. > >> >> I know you can't use the 1 bit mask in the subnetting a c because >> it will give a network address and a mask with nothing in between. >> >> Will a 254.0.0.0 set it up so that 10.1.0.0 is the base and >> 10.2.255.255 is the broadcast. > >To do that, the netmask would be 255.252.0.0, but that would include >10.0.0.0/16, 10.1.0.0/16, 10.2.0.0/16 and 10.3.0.0/16, so the broadcast >would be 10.3.255.255 But isn't 10.0.0.0/255.254.0.0 a valid netmask? It would give 10.0.0.0/16 and 10.1.0.0/16, which wouldn't work for the posted is doing ie routing between the 2 networks. It certainly isn't a CIDR mask, but should be valid for supernets. Jeff Mountin - Unix Systems TCP/IP networking jeff@mountin.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Sep 25 10:29:18 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA05541 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 10:29:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from xwin.webweaver.net (xwin.webweaver.net [208.138.29.35]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA05518; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 10:29:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nicole@xwin.webweaver.net) Received: by xwin.webweaver.net (VMailer, from userid 1001) id 6A17916812; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 09:29:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.2 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 09:29:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Nicole Harrington To: Konrad Heuer Subject: Re: PID killed, exceeeded maximum CPU limit... Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by hub.freebsd.org id KAA05532 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >> >> Sep 25 04:45:00 test2 /kernel: pid 137 (inetd), uid 0, was killed: >> exceeded maximum CPU limit > > Sounds strange. Normally there should no CPU time limit for the daemon > processes. Please check login class "daemon" in "/etc/login.conf". The > corresponding entry should be ":cputime=infinity:". If nothings works > insert the line > > ulimit -t unlimited > > at the beginning of your "/etc/rc" file. > > But before doing that ypu should ask yourself how "inetd" has been started > before. May be someone knowing the root password started "inetd" manually > after problems from a shell with a CPU time limit set? Ok, the pid is > small, so that's unlikely, but ... > > Konrad Heuer Thanks to everyone who has responded. Inetd is started vi rc.conf as normal. I have altered login.conf lowering the limits for defualt and set up a special group with higher limits etc for Technical employees, however I haven't touched daemon or root and since it sais "uid 0" I would have to assume that it was running with the process time of root which to me is what makes it so odd. This is the second time I have seen this type of error. Last time my qmail process quit with the same error. I start qmail via /usr/local/etc/rc.d/script. Perhaps it is as David Greenman suggested a clock or accounting bug. I am running 2.2.6-RELEASE. Could it just be that I need to increase my max users (currently 128) or some other sysctl setting? But at ~4:00 in the morning, I don't understand what would kill inetd on this machine since the only thing being used via inetd is the qmail pop3. Could this be the result of a hacking attempt? Thanks Nicole nicole@webweaver.net - http://www.webweaver.net/ webmistress@dangermouse.org - http://www.dangermouse.org/ ------------------------------------------------- -- Powered by Coka Cola and FreeBSD -- - Stong enough for a man - But made for a Woman -- -- Microsoft: What bug would you like today? -- - I tried an internal modem once, but it hurt when I walked -- --------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Sep 25 10:39:37 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA07416 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 10:39:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from peak.mountin.net (peak.mountin.net [207.227.119.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA07410 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 10:39:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jeff-ml@mountin.net) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by peak.mountin.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) id MAA05731; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 12:39:37 -0500 (CDT) Received: from harkol-12.isdn.mke.execpc.com(169.207.64.140) by peak.mountin.net via smap (V1.3) id sma005729; Fri Sep 25 12:39:33 1998 Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.19980925123826.006e1604@207.227.119.2> X-Sender: jeff-ml@207.227.119.2 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.3 (32) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 12:38:26 -0500 To: dg@root.com From: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" Subject: Re: PID killed, exceeeded maximum CPU limit... Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199809251508.IAA24807@implode.root.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 08:08 AM 9/25/98 -0700, David Greenman wrote: >> Please forgive the Niaveness of this question, and my poor spelling at 5:50 in >>the morning, but what usually causes something to exceed the CPU limit and what >>CPU limit is the message below probobly refering too. How can I prevent this? >> >> >>Sep 25 04:45:00 test2 /kernel: pid 137 (inetd), uid 0, was killed: exceeded >>maximum CPU limit > > ...a bug in the FreeBSD clock/accounting code that causes it to come up >with negative numbers sometimes. I believe this has been fixed - what are >you running on the machine? So if a limit in login.conf for the user/class is exceeded it will log? I've never seen it, but know for a fact that Apache has exceeded the maxprocesses and openfiles limits, but no log of this event. Currently I'm seeing a "ps: kvm_getprocs: Cannot allocate memory" and empty ps output from a cron running as root and near as I can tell root doesn't even come close to the limits. This on a PPro w/256MB running 2.2.7 that is a pretty loaded webserver. I've been bit by login classes before. Rather scary that inetd would be killed. Jeff Mountin - Unix Systems TCP/IP networking jeff@mountin.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Sep 25 11:17:00 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA13957 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 11:17:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from Gatekeeper.Alameda.net (gatekeeper.Alameda.net [207.90.181.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA13944 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 11:16:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ulf@Gatekeeper.Alameda.net) Received: by Gatekeeper.Alameda.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id LAA18066; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 11:16:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <19980925111651.D22112@Alameda.net> Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 11:16:51 -0700 From: Ulf Zimmermann To: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" , Bill Vermillion , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Routing problem Reply-To: ulf@Alameda.net References: <199809240148.VAA29188@bilver.magicnet.net> <360938BE.3569E424@eaznet.com> <199809240148.VAA29188@bilver.magicnet.net> <19980924150846.C24890@Alameda.net> <3.0.3.32.19980925121618.00714074@207.227.119.2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1i In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.19980925121618.00714074@207.227.119.2>; from Jeffrey J. Mountin on Fri, Sep 25, 1998 at 12:16:18PM -0500 Organization: Alameda Networks, Inc. X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 2.2.6-STABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Sep 25, 1998 at 12:16:18PM -0500, Jeffrey J. Mountin wrote: > At 03:08 PM 9/24/98 -0700, Ulf Zimmermann wrote: > >On Wed, Sep 23, 1998 at 09:48:10PM -0400, Bill Vermillion wrote: > >> Eddie Fry recently said: > >> > Randal, > >> > > >> > Ronald says he has 2 class C's so his mask should be 255.255.255.0. > >> > >> He says he has two class C's but he's using class A addressing. > >> > >> Shouldn't the netmask really be 254.0.0.0 ? That way it will > >> supernet the 10.1 and the 10.2 into two parallel blocks out of > >> address.. 10.1 thru 10.2. > > > >254 would give you a supernet which includes 10.0.0.0/8 and 11.0.0.0/8. > > > >> > >> I know you can't use the 1 bit mask in the subnetting a c because > >> it will give a network address and a mask with nothing in between. > >> > >> Will a 254.0.0.0 set it up so that 10.1.0.0 is the base and > >> 10.2.255.255 is the broadcast. > > > >To do that, the netmask would be 255.252.0.0, but that would include > >10.0.0.0/16, 10.1.0.0/16, 10.2.0.0/16 and 10.3.0.0/16, so the broadcast > >would be 10.3.255.255 > > But isn't 10.0.0.0/255.254.0.0 a valid netmask? It would give 10.0.0.0/16 and 10.1.0.0/16, which wouldn't work for the posted is doing ie routing between the 2 networks. > > It certainly isn't a CIDR mask, but should be valid for supernets. It is a valid netmask, but it wouldn't include 10.1.0.0/16 and 10.2.0.0/16 as he wrote. > > > Jeff Mountin - Unix Systems TCP/IP networking > jeff@mountin.net -- Regards, Ulf. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Ulf Zimmermann, 1525 Pacific Ave., Alameda, CA-94501, #: 510-769-2936 Alameda Networks, Inc. | http://www.Alameda.net | Fax#: 510-521-5073 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Sep 25 11:53:58 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA19844 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 11:53:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from peak.mountin.net (peak.mountin.net [207.227.119.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA19839 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 11:53:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jeff-ml@mountin.net) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by peak.mountin.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) id NAA06304; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 13:52:39 -0500 (CDT) Received: from harkol-12.isdn.mke.execpc.com(169.207.64.140) by peak.mountin.net via smap (V1.3) id sma006300; Fri Sep 25 13:52:38 1998 Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.19980925135130.00774a48@207.227.119.2> X-Sender: jeff-ml@207.227.119.2 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.3 (32) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 13:51:30 -0500 To: ulf@Alameda.net, Bill Vermillion , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG From: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" Subject: Re: Routing problem In-Reply-To: <19980925111651.D22112@Alameda.net> References: <3.0.3.32.19980925121618.00714074@207.227.119.2> <199809240148.VAA29188@bilver.magicnet.net> <360938BE.3569E424@eaznet.com> <199809240148.VAA29188@bilver.magicnet.net> <19980924150846.C24890@Alameda.net> <3.0.3.32.19980925121618.00714074@207.227.119.2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 11:16 AM 9/25/98 -0700, Ulf Zimmermann wrote: >It is a valid netmask, but it wouldn't include 10.1.0.0/16 and 10.2.0.0/16 as >he wrote. Duh! Missread and for the odd numbered network. Guess this would be an example of network planning and boundaries. Planning ahead to simplify masking is something that seems to have been missed recently, if you follow all the talk about IPFW and long rulesets. Jeff Mountin - Unix Systems TCP/IP networking jeff@mountin.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Sep 25 12:06:56 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA21868 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 12:06:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from Gatekeeper.Alameda.net (gatekeeper.Alameda.net [207.90.181.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA21858 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 12:06:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ulf@Gatekeeper.Alameda.net) Received: by Gatekeeper.Alameda.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id MAA20583; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 12:06:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <19980925120646.F22112@Alameda.net> Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 12:06:46 -0700 From: Ulf Zimmermann To: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" , Bill Vermillion , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Routing problem Reply-To: ulf@Alameda.net References: <3.0.3.32.19980925121618.00714074@207.227.119.2> <199809240148.VAA29188@bilver.magicnet.net> <360938BE.3569E424@eaznet.com> <199809240148.VAA29188@bilver.magicnet.net> <19980924150846.C24890@Alameda.net> <3.0.3.32.19980925121618.00714074@207.227.119.2> <19980925111651.D22112@Alameda.net> <3.0.3.32.19980925135130.00774a48@207.227.119.2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1i In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.19980925135130.00774a48@207.227.119.2>; from Jeffrey J. Mountin on Fri, Sep 25, 1998 at 01:51:30PM -0500 Organization: Alameda Networks, Inc. X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 2.2.6-STABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Sep 25, 1998 at 01:51:30PM -0500, Jeffrey J. Mountin wrote: > At 11:16 AM 9/25/98 -0700, Ulf Zimmermann wrote: > >It is a valid netmask, but it wouldn't include 10.1.0.0/16 and 10.2.0.0/16 as > >he wrote. > > Duh! Missread and for the odd numbered network. > > Guess this would be an example of network planning and boundaries. Planning ahead to simplify masking is something that seems to have been missed recently, if you follow all the talk about IPFW and long rulesets. Yep. Always plan your boundaries good. And I speak out of experience with a campus of > 600 used networks out of 2 Class B and ~80 Class C with basicly no way to aggregate anything, as all the /24 out of the Bs are given out single. > > > Jeff Mountin - Unix Systems TCP/IP networking > jeff@mountin.net -- Regards, Ulf. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Ulf Zimmermann, 1525 Pacific Ave., Alameda, CA-94501, #: 510-769-2936 Alameda Networks, Inc. | http://www.Alameda.net | Fax#: 510-521-5073 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Sep 25 12:07:03 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA21926 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 12:07:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from palrel1.hp.com (palrel1.hp.com [156.153.255.242]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA21918 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 12:07:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from keithm@hprrc726.rose.hp.com) Received: from hprrc726.rose.hp.com (hprrc181.rose.hp.com [15.56.217.181]) by palrel1.hp.com (8.8.6/8.8.5tis) with ESMTP id MAA12045; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 12:06:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by hprrc726.rose.hp.com (1.37.109.16/15.5+ECS 3.3) id AA234240415; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 12:06:55 -0700 From: Keith Middlekauff Message-Id: <199809251906.AA234240415@hprrc726.rose.hp.com> Subject: Re: Routing problem To: jeff-ml@mountin.net, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Fri, 25 Sep 98 12:06:54 PDT In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.19980925121618.00714074@207.227.119.2>; from "Jeffrey J. Mountin" at Sep 25, 98 12:16 (noon) Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85] Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > But isn't 10.0.0.0/255.254.0.0 a valid netmask? It would give 10.0.0.0/16 and 10.1.0.0/16, which wouldn't work for the posted is doing ie routing between the 2 networks. The network would be 10.0.0.0/15 The two number mentioned , 10.0.0.0 and 10.1.0.0 would be on the same network. Netmask: 255.254.0.0 11111111 11111110 00000000 00000000 00001010 00000000 00000000 00000000 10.0.0.0 00001010 00000001 00000000 00000000 10.1.0.0 <--Network-----> Keith > Jeff Mountin - Unix Systems TCP/IP networking > jeff@mountin.net > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > -- *********************************************************************** * Keith Middlekauff E-mail: keithm@rc.rose.hp.com * * HP-UX Network Support Phone : (916) 785-0080 * * North American Response Center Phone : (800) 633-3600 * * Hewlett-Packard Company Fax : (916) 748-1415 * *********************************************************************** To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Sep 25 15:39:44 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA28058 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 15:39:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from aniwa.sky (pppk-13.igrin.co.nz [202.49.245.92]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA28036; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 15:39:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andrew@squiz.co.nz) Received: from localhost (andrew@localhost) by aniwa.sky (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id JAA05875; Sat, 26 Sep 1998 09:34:42 +1200 (NZST) (envelope-from andrew@squiz.co.nz) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1998 09:34:11 +1200 (NZST) From: Andrew McNaughton X-Sender: andrew@aniwa.sky Reply-To: andrew@squiz.co.nz To: Nicole Harrington cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PID killed, exceeeded maximum CPU limit... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 25 Sep 1998, Nicole Harrington wrote: > Inetd is started vi rc.conf as normal. I have altered login.conf lowering the > limits for defualt and set up a special group with higher limits etc for > Technical employees, however I haven't touched daemon or root and since it sais > "uid 0" I would have to assume that it was running with the process time of > root which to me is what makes it so odd. This is the second time I have seen > this type of error. Last time my qmail process quit with the same error. I > start qmail via /usr/local/etc/rc.d/script. You could try putting this into your /usr/local/etc/rc: #!/bin/sh logger -t limits `limits` Should give you a clear (enough) log entry telling you what resource limits processes are being forked with from rc. Andrew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sat Sep 26 09:26:58 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA19968 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Sat, 26 Sep 1998 09:26:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from home.shvetc.zp.ua (shvetc-bayda.marka.net.ua [193.193.219.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA19951; Sat, 26 Sep 1998 09:26:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eugene@shvetc.zp.ua) Received: from wints (wints.shvetc.zp.ua [193.193.219.186]) by home.shvetc.zp.ua (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id TAA10932; Sat, 26 Sep 1998 19:26:23 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <000101bde96a$67356680$badbc1c1@wints.shvetc.zp.ua> From: "Eugene Shvetc" To: Cc: , Subject: traffic counter Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1998 19:26:21 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3155.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi! There is a task: to write programm, which daily counts up amount byte, transferred through interface. It is necessary, what it took information from mrtg log files, or itself took statistics using snmp. Nobody was engaged in such? And that completely is no time to write itself :-( Beforehand is grateful. --- Eugene Shvetc MARKA ISP eugene@shvetc.zp.ua Tel, fax: +380 612 120186 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sat Sep 26 10:07:38 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA24629 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Sat, 26 Sep 1998 10:07:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [199.2.210.241]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA24616 for ; Sat, 26 Sep 1998 10:07:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from batie@agora.rdrop.com) Received: (from batie@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA11116; Sat, 26 Sep 1998 10:07:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <19980926100728.26872@rdrop.com> Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1998 10:07:28 -0700 From: Alan Batie To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Strange popper behavior Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-md5; boundary=ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I've got a weird situation where some of my users are getting the popper error: -ERR Unable to process From lines (envelopes), change recognition modes. On the surface, this just looks like a From line corruption problem, but if I copy the mailbox to a test account and access it as that user, it works fine. I ran ktrace on popper while one of the users having the problem accessed his mailbox, and the block of data read just before the error was logged looks fine --- no leading "From "'s in the text, the date formats on the From lines are normal, etc. I don't suppose anyone has seen the before and has the magic bullet? -- Alan Batie ______ www.rdrop.com/users/batie Me batie@agora.rdrop.com \ / www.qrd.org The Triangle PGPFP DE 3C 29 17 C0 49 7A \ / www.pgpi.com The Weird Numbers 27 40 A5 3C 37 4A DA 52 B9 \/ www.anti-spam.net NO SPAM! --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBNg0fUIv4wNua7QglAQFM3gP9FLGN3uwMTjMzjiudlPtxL2rNdLI1LcNA P0XeiMZJu8hNG+9ej21GC2cLrMzjfriVSwDrBLyI5Axvzlfhg+4PWT/X12g7EtTR jomT5B6GqgUU4dAXGoOmV9ufQLNwpNnhexm+POWdY6GPugEmaDwTaaZPc+IPT92A sKQdJFpEfnk= =uc/G -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sat Sep 26 13:50:19 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA16597 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Sat, 26 Sep 1998 13:50:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from peak.mountin.net (peak.mountin.net [207.227.119.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA16590 for ; Sat, 26 Sep 1998 13:50:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jeff-ml@mountin.net) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by peak.mountin.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) id PAA09709; Sat, 26 Sep 1998 15:50:10 -0500 (CDT) Received: from klinzhai-92.isdn.mke.execpc.com(169.207.65.220) by peak.mountin.net via smap (V1.3) id sma009704; Sat Sep 26 15:49:48 1998 Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.19980926154836.006e0320@207.227.119.2> X-Sender: jeff-ml@207.227.119.2 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.3 (32) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1998 15:48:36 -0500 To: Alan Batie , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG From: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" Subject: Re: Strange popper behavior In-Reply-To: <19980926100728.26872@rdrop.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 10:07 AM 9/26/98 -0700, Alan Batie wrote: >I've got a weird situation where some of my users are getting the popper >error: > > -ERR Unable to process From lines (envelopes), change recognition modes. > >On the surface, this just looks like a From line corruption problem, but >if I copy the mailbox to a test account and access it as that user, it >works fine. I ran ktrace on popper while one of the users having the >problem accessed his mailbox, and the block of data read just before the >error was logged looks fine --- no leading "From "'s in the text, the >date formats on the From lines are normal, etc. I don't suppose anyone >has seen the before and has the magic bullet? This may not be related, but a similar problem with a user/password that would not work with popper, but would with telnet and ftp. Rather puzzling, since I could change the username or password, but otherwise it would give password incorrect. Even if I redid the password and verified the DES was different. This was with qpoppper 2.50 on a 2.2.6 system. Never checked if this was a problem on 2.2.7 with the lastest port. Try changing the password or username by one character and see what happens. Certainly an odd annoyance. Jeff Mountin - Unix Systems TCP/IP networking jeff@mountin.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sat Sep 26 19:01:02 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA21834 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Sat, 26 Sep 1998 19:01:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from poseidon.hamsterville.ultranet.com (poseidon.hamsterville.ultranet.com [209.6.79.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA21829 for ; Sat, 26 Sep 1998 19:00:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ben@hamsterville.ultranet.com) Received: from energizer (dyn2.hamsterville.ultranet.com [209.6.79.23]) by poseidon.hamsterville.ultranet.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) with SMTP id WAA14324; Sat, 26 Sep 1998 22:00:34 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19980926215912.00985d00@poseidon.hamsterville.ultranet.com> X-Sender: ben@poseidon.hamsterville.ultranet.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1998 21:59:12 -0400 To: Alan Batie , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG From: Ben Goodwin Subject: Re: Strange popper behavior In-Reply-To: <19980926100728.26872@rdrop.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org How did you copy the box? Often what happens is the spool gets corrupted with NULL's at the top, which can't be seen with some tools. You can also compile qpopper with -DDEBUG and set syslog to log the facility at DEBUG to see what's going on. -= Ben At 10:07 AM 9/26/98 -0700, Alan Batie wrote: >I've got a weird situation where some of my users are getting the popper >error: > > -ERR Unable to process From lines (envelopes), change recognition modes. > >On the surface, this just looks like a From line corruption problem, but >if I copy the mailbox to a test account and access it as that user, it >works fine. I ran ktrace on popper while one of the users having the >problem accessed his mailbox, and the block of data read just before the >error was logged looks fine --- no leading "From "'s in the text, the >date formats on the From lines are normal, etc. I don't suppose anyone >has seen the before and has the magic bullet? > >-- >Alan Batie ______ www.rdrop.com/users/batie Me >batie@agora.rdrop.com \ / www.qrd.org The Triangle >PGPFP DE 3C 29 17 C0 49 7A \ / www.pgpi.com The Weird Numbers >27 40 A5 3C 37 4A DA 52 B9 \/ www.anti-spam.net NO SPAM! > >Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\Strange popper behavior" > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message