From owner-freebsd-mozilla Mon May 25 03:33:15 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA19379 for freebsd-mozilla-outgoing; Mon, 25 May 1998 03:33:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-mozilla@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from elit.elit.chernigov.ua (elit.elit.chernigov.ua [193.125.84.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA19372 for ; Mon, 25 May 1998 03:33:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from al@cn.ua) Received: from cn.ua (al@dragon.cinet.cn.ua [193.125.84.115]) by elit.elit.chernigov.ua (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA29480 for ; Mon, 25 May 1998 13:32:55 +0300 (EET DST) Message-ID: <356948D7.5DD9AB90@cn.ua> Date: Mon, 25 May 1998 13:32:55 +0300 From: Alexey Lukin Organization: JSC CINET X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.33 i586) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mozilla@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Motif requirement References: <6k6va4$a74@elit.elit.chernigov.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-mozilla@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Adric wrote: [...] > ? > ? QT library (www.troll.no) is very good and according to KDE > ? (www.kde.org) > ? project will remain in public domain. > ? TrollTech already has working port of Mozilla and QT runs on huge number > ? of platforms. > ? Why not? > > Restricted license. QT is not free for commercial development, and this > conflictswith the FreeBSD license. Use GTK or lesstif please? > I'm not a exepert in legal stuff, but is FreeBSD-Mozilla goes commercial? QT free edition for *NIX is _Free_ and KDE team uses it for FREE product. I use KDE on Linux and FreeBSD and happy with it :-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mozilla" in the body of the message