From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 3 07:22:06 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA04210 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sun, 3 May 1998 07:22:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from smtp1.xs4all.nl (smtp1.xs4all.nl [194.109.6.51]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA04202 for ; Sun, 3 May 1998 07:22:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from a001@xs4all.nl) From: a001@xs4all.nl Received: from stl-sys-6 (graphizz@stl-group.xs4all.nl [194.109.83.251]) by smtp1.xs4all.nl (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id QAA27338 for ; Sun, 3 May 1998 16:21:58 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19980503162157.00888ae0@xs4all.nl> X-Sender: a001@xs4all.nl (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Sun, 03 May 1998 16:21:57 +0200 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk subscribe freebsd-stable _________________________________________________________ J.J.W.H. Baggen Starline Group Europe www.stl-group.com SALES DEPARTEMENT: sales@stl-group.com +31(0)455 650 137 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 3 09:27:01 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA16567 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sun, 3 May 1998 09:27:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at [128.130.111.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA16559 for ; Sun, 3 May 1998 09:26:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at) Received: from alcyone (alcyone.dbai.tuwien.ac.at [128.130.111.54]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id SAA29565; Sun, 3 May 1998 18:26:48 +0200 (MET-DST) Date: Sun, 3 May 1998 18:26:45 +0200 (MET DST) From: Gerald Pfeifer X-Sender: pfeifer@alcyone.dbai.tuwien.ac.at Reply-To: Gerald Pfeifer To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG cc: "David O'Brien" , egcs@cygnus.com Subject: Re: GCC In-Reply-To: <19980430041417.42994@nuxi.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk [ Added egcs@cygnus.com, as this might be interesting. ] On Thu, 30 Apr 1998, David O'Brien wrote: >> BTW, are there any plans of making EGCS the default compiler for >> FreeBSD? > [egcs] is a way fast moving target. Much of the time the snapshots > won't compile under FreeBSD. I was certainly not speaking of snapshots. EGCS _releases_ are extremely well tested and solid. (OTOH, GCC 2.8.1 still "exceeds virtual memory" when trying to optimize some code of mine, a bug that has been fixed for EGCS last December.) > In production shops, I've seen a lot more places go to gcc 2.8.1 > than EGCS, so I feel gcc/g++ is better tested and stable. Guys like Joe Buck , author of the "FAQ for g++ and libg++", happen to disagree: [EGCS 1.0.x] is considerably more stable than 2.8.1 and vastly more stable than the gcc2 snapshots [...] http://www.cygnus.com/ml/egcs/1998-Apr/1105.html > The last "release" is 1.0.2, but there was much development done from > the time 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 that didn't get into 1.0.2. BTW, RedHat plans to build its 5.1 release with EGCS 1.0.3 and there are already plans for an EGCS 1.1 release as well... Gerald -- Gerald Pfeifer (Jerry) Vienna University of Technology pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 3 19:05:50 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA18600 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sun, 3 May 1998 19:05:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA18553 for ; Sun, 3 May 1998 19:05:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA01510; Sun, 3 May 1998 19:05:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: Gerald Pfeifer cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, "David O'Brien" Subject: Re: GCC In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 03 May 1998 18:26:45 +0200." Date: Sun, 03 May 1998 19:05:06 -0700 Message-ID: <1505.894247506@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > BTW, RedHat plans to build its 5.1 release with EGCS 1.0.3 and there > are already plans for an EGCS 1.1 release as well... That's almost a vote against it - they have a bad track record for adopting technologies before they're ready. :-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 3 20:57:08 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA07797 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sun, 3 May 1998 20:57:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from relay.nuxi.com (nuxi.cs.ucdavis.edu [128.120.56.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA07776 for ; Sun, 3 May 1998 20:56:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by relay.nuxi.com (8.8.7/8.6.12) id DAA13349; Mon, 4 May 1998 03:56:44 GMT Message-ID: <19980503205644.30330@nuxi.com> Date: Sun, 3 May 1998 20:56:44 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Gerald Pfeifer Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: GCC Reply-To: obrien@NUXI.com References: <19980430041417.42994@nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88 In-Reply-To: ; from Gerald Pfeifer on Sun, May 03, 1998 at 06:26:45PM +0200 X-Warning: Mutt Bites! X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 2.2.5-STABLE Organization: The NUXI *BSD group X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Keyid: 34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Sun, May 03, 1998 at 06:26:45PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > I was certainly not speaking of snapshots. EGCS _releases_ are > extremely well tested and solid. Maybe, but if you look at the mailing lists, there are tons of complains and bugs against 1.0.2. In fact, I can't even get it to compile under Solaris 2.6. GCC 2.8.1 does with no problem. > Guys like Joe Buck , author of the "FAQ for g++ > and libg++", happen to disagree: > [EGCS 1.0.x] is considerably more stable than 2.8.1 and vastly Maybe under Linux, but I can only get 1 in 3 snap shots to even compile under FreeBSD, and I haven't gotten any since 1.0.1 to compile under Solaris with the stock `as', `ld' and SunPro C. (I think I tried using gcc too). Which underscores my problem with EGCS -- it isn't tested under near the number of machines as GCC. It has a big part of the Linux camp intertwined, and thus probably why it might be stable enough for RH 5.1. Of course the EGCS community is also sending a *lot* of time hacking EGCS so it would work the glibc2 stuff, rather than worry about the C++ compiler itself... > and there are already plans for an EGCS 1.1 release as well... I dare say there are plans for a 1.2 release as well.. Just as there are plans *somewhere* for a FreeBSD 4.0. -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.ucdavis.edu -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 4 09:11:28 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA26986 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Mon, 4 May 1998 09:11:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from tamago.synopsys.com (tamago.synopsys.com [146.225.8.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA26977 for ; Mon, 4 May 1998 09:11:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jbuck@Synopsys.COM) Received: from javelin.synopsys.com (javelin.synopsys.com [146.225.100.38]) by tamago.synopsys.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA05647; Mon, 4 May 1998 09:09:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from atrus.synopsys.com (atrus.synopsys.com [146.225.121.23]) by javelin.synopsys.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA15409; Mon, 4 May 1998 09:10:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Joe Buck Received: by atrus.synopsys.com (SMI-8.6/SNPS-Sol2) id JAA18839; Mon, 4 May 1998 09:10:04 -0700 Message-Id: <199805041610.JAA18839@atrus.synopsys.com> Subject: Re: GCC To: pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at Date: Mon, 4 May 98 9:10:04 PDT Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, obrien@NUXI.com, egcs@cygnus.com In-Reply-To: ; from "Gerald Pfeifer" at May 3, 98 6:26 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11] Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > > In production shops, I've seen a lot more places go to gcc 2.8.1 > > than EGCS, so I feel gcc/g++ is better tested and stable. > > Guys like Joe Buck , author of the "FAQ for g++ > and libg++", happen to disagree: > > [EGCS 1.0.x] is considerably more stable than 2.8.1 and vastly > more stable than the gcc2 snapshots [...] My statement above applies to C++. For C, I'd say gcc 2.8.1 seems fine. Those of us on both lists who see the reports know that the egcs testing has been more thorough that the gcc 2.8.x testing. Also, because gcc 2.8.1 is missing some crucial backend fixes, I would be very cautious about shipping any C++ code that uses exceptions with 2.8.1. Those false warnings you get with -O and -Wall are due to gcc 2.8.1's faulty control flow analysis, and that faulty analysis is used as the basis of optimization. Of course, you can verify by careful testing that your code is not being misoptimized, but since there is a better option available you are better off using it. gcc -fno-exceptions for gcc 2.8.1 is probably fine. The scandal is that the story FSF has put out as to why gcc 2.8.x took so long had to do with exceptions -- and they *still* haven't gotten it right. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 4 10:59:29 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA18965 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Mon, 4 May 1998 10:59:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from kaiwan.kaiwan.com (kaiwan.kaiwan.com [198.178.203.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA18884 for ; Mon, 4 May 1998 10:59:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) Received: from exit.com (uucp@localhost) by kaiwan.kaiwan.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with UUCP id KAA16634 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 4 May 1998 10:59:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from frank@localhost) by exit.com (8.8.8/8.7.3) id KAA12832 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 4 May 1998 10:53:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Frank Mayhar Message-Id: <199805041753.KAA12832@exit.com> Subject: Status of DPT driver in 2.2-stable? To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Mon, 4 May 1998 10:53:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL17 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk I have an ISP that wants to use a DPT controller in a production Usenet News machine. I see from the hackers archive that a driver for that controller is in -stable, but wanted to know about folk's experiences with it. Any problems? Can I recommend it, or should I recommend another controller? -- Frank Mayhar frank@exit.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 4 13:13:44 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA14270 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Mon, 4 May 1998 13:13:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pop.uniserve.com (pop.uniserve.com [204.244.156.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id NAA14221 for ; Mon, 4 May 1998 13:13:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tom@uniserve.com) Received: from shell.uniserve.ca [204.244.186.218] by pop.uniserve.com with smtp (Exim 1.82 #4) id 0yWRbc-0003FL-00; Mon, 4 May 1998 13:12:56 -0700 Date: Mon, 4 May 1998 13:12:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom X-Sender: tom@shell.uniserve.ca To: Frank Mayhar cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Status of DPT driver in 2.2-stable? In-Reply-To: <199805041753.KAA12832@exit.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Mon, 4 May 1998, Frank Mayhar wrote: > I have an ISP that wants to use a DPT controller in a production Usenet News > machine. I see from the hackers archive that a driver for that controller > is in -stable, but wanted to know about folk's experiences with it. Any > problems? Can I recommend it, or should I recommend another controller? It is the only supported host based RAID controller. It is quite stable, when used on a good motherboard. I've never had a problem. The driver is rather more stable/robust than the ahc driver. > -- > Frank Mayhar frank@exit.com Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 4 13:25:05 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA16891 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Mon, 4 May 1998 13:25:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from cygint.cygnus.com (cygnus.com [205.180.230.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA16828 for ; Mon, 4 May 1998 13:24:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from law@hurl.cygnus.com) Received: from localhost.cygnus.com (hurl.cygnus.com [208.224.120.146]) by cygint.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7-cygnus) with ESMTP id NAA03438; Mon, 4 May 1998 13:24:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: cygnus.com: Processed from queue /var/spool/mqueue To: Joe Buck cc: pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, obrien@NUXI.com, egcs@cygnus.com Subject: Re: GCC Reply-To: law@cygnus.com In-reply-to: Your message of Mon, 04 May 1998 09:10:04 MDT. <199805041610.JAA18839@atrus.synopsys.com> Date: Mon, 04 May 1998 14:24:00 -0600 Message-ID: <6664.894313440@hurl.cygnus.com> From: Jeffrey A Law Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk In message <199805041610.JAA18839@atrus.synopsys.com>you write: > > > > In production shops, I've seen a lot more places go to gcc 2.8.1 > > > than EGCS, so I feel gcc/g++ is better tested and stable. > > > > Guys like Joe Buck , author of the "FAQ for g++ > > and libg++", happen to disagree: > > > > [EGCS 1.0.x] is considerably more stable than 2.8.1 and vastly > > more stable than the gcc2 snapshots [...] > > My statement above applies to C++. For C, I'd say gcc 2.8.1 seems fine. I suspect egcs-1.0.x to be more stable than 2.8.1 for C code too, but the cases where one would notice are more obscure. For example we've fixed quite a few bugs exposed by glibc. Most of the bugs are probably in gcc-2.8.1. The symptoms of those bugs are such that folks are less likely to notice them. An interesting exercise would be to run the testsuite from the development tree against gcc-2.8.1 and the upcoming egcs-1.0.3 release :-) I'd bet egcs performs better than gcc-2.7 and gcc-2.8 on most if not all significant targets. > I would be very cautious > about shipping any C++ code that uses exceptions with 2.8.1. Those > false warnings you get with -O and -Wall are due to gcc 2.8.1's faulty > control flow analysis, and that faulty analysis is used as the basis > of optimization. Yup. And the person in charge of gcc2 has rejected our suggestions for fixing the inaccuracies in the cfg. gcc2 relies on some rather fragile code to avoid incorrect code with optimization and EH. I'm not convinced that code will work right with the existing gcc2 optimizations. I know it will not work with the additional optimizations already in egcs. Our scheme of computing an accurate cfg works and will continue to work as egcs continues to implement more aggressive optimizers. > Those of us on both lists who see the reports know that the egcs testing > has been more thorough that the gcc 2.8.x testing. Absolutely. egcs-1.0.x went through much more rigorous testing than gcc-2.8.x. But since the gcc2 lists are not public most folks are not aware of how little testing went into gcc-2.8. > gcc -fno-exceptions for gcc 2.8.1 is probably fine. The scandal is that > the story FSF has put out as to why gcc 2.8.x took so long had to do with > exceptions -- and they *still* haven't gotten it right. Yup. Sad really. jeff To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 4 13:39:07 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA19464 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Mon, 4 May 1998 13:39:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from thelab.hub.org (tc-66.acadiau.ca [131.162.2.166]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA19386 for ; Mon, 4 May 1998 13:38:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (scrappy@localhost) by thelab.hub.org (8.8.8/8.8.2) with SMTP id RAA16829 for ; Mon, 4 May 1998 17:38:31 -0300 (ADT) X-Authentication-Warning: thelab.hub.org: scrappy owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 4 May 1998 17:38:31 -0300 (ADT) From: The Hermit Hacker To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: vm_object_deallocate: object deallocated too many times Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Morning... Before I dig too deeply, considering this is a March 29th -stable kernel, after 35days of uptime, my system just rebooted with the included core. Is this worth providing more data for, or is it something that was quite possibly fixed since the 29th, and I should just upgrade? # gdb -k kernel.Mar29 vmcore.1 GDB is free software and you are welcome to distribute copies of it under certain conditions; type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB; type "show warranty" for details. GDB 4.16 (i386-unknown-freebsd), Copyright 1996 Free Software Foundation, Inc... IdlePTD 1c2000 current pcb at 1a9070 panic: vm_object_deallocate: object deallocated too many times #0 boot (howto=256) at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:266 266 dumppcb.pcb_cr3 = rcr3(); (kgdb) where #0 boot (howto=256) at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:266 #1 0xf010ec72 in panic ( fmt=0xf016e3e3 "vm_object_deallocate: object deallocated too many times") at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:390 #2 0xf016e44d in vm_object_deallocate (object=0xf1b59300) at ../../vm/vm_object.c:264 #3 0xf016c954 in vm_map_entry_delete (map=0xf1024f00, entry=0xf198d500) at ../../vm/vm_map.c:1885 #4 0xf016cad0 in vm_map_delete (map=0xf1024f00, start=4093620224, end=4093628416) at ../../vm/vm_map.c:1986 #5 0xf01277ce in bfreekva (bp=0xf36cc610) at ../../kern/vfs_bio.c:194 #6 0xf01280d0 in brelse (bp=0xf36cc610) at ../../kern/vfs_bio.c:603 #7 0xf01289b8 in getnewbuf (slpflag=0, slptimeo=0, size=8192, maxsize=8192) at ../../kern/vfs_bio.c:1000 #8 0xf0128d55 in getblk (vp=0xf17dbd00, blkno=2128, size=8192, slpflag=0, slptimeo=0) at ../../kern/vfs_bio.c:1197 #9 0xf01278ad in bread (vp=0xf17dbd00, blkno=2128, size=8192, cred=0x0, bpp=0xefbffbec) at ../../kern/vfs_bio.c:228 #10 0xf015c265 in ffs_balloc (ip=0xf1e3f400, bn=2128, size=4096, cred=0xf1024a80, bpp=0xefbffcd8, flags=1) at ../../ufs/ffs/ffs_balloc.c:280 #11 0xf015f24d in ffs_write (ap=0xefbffd04) at ../../ufs/ufs/ufs_readwrite.c:260 #12 0xf01746d6 in vnode_pager_leaf_putpages (object=0xf2195100, m=0xefbffdf0, count=1, sync=0, rtvals=0xefbffdc4) at vnode_if.h:283 #13 0xf01744aa in vnode_pager_putpages (object=0xf2195100, m=0xefbffdf0, count=1, sync=0, rtvals=0xefbffdc4) at ../../vm/vnode_pager.c:876 #14 0xf0172a4e in vm_pager_put_pages (object=0xf2195100, m=0xefbffdf0, count=1, sync=0, rtvals=0xefbffdc4) at ../../vm/vm_pager.c:199 #15 0xf01718d2 in vm_pageout_flush (mc=0xefbffdf0, count=1, sync=0) at ../../vm/vm_pageout.c:345 #16 0xf016eb76 in vm_object_page_clean (object=0xf2195100, start=0, end=0, syncio=1, lockflag=1) at ../../vm/vm_object.c:580 #17 0xf012e1ea in vfs_msync (mp=0xf16b6400, flags=2) at ../../kern/vfs_subr.c:1610 #18 0xf012e88c in sync (p=0xf1693c00, uap=0x0, retval=0x0) at ../../kern/vfs_syscalls.c:359 #19 0xf0129a9b in vfs_update () at ../../kern/vfs_bio.c:1719 #20 0xf01054ca in kproc_start (udata=0xf01a0470) at ../../kern/init_main.c:244 #21 0xf0105468 in main (framep=0xefbfffb8) at ../../kern/init_main.c:194 Marc G. Fournier Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 4 16:10:40 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA24493 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Mon, 4 May 1998 16:10:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from unagi.cybernothing.org (www.netpress.org [209.133.38.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA24453 for ; Mon, 4 May 1998 16:10:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdfalk@unagi.cybernothing.org) Received: (from jdfalk@localhost) by unagi.cybernothing.org (8.8.8/8.8.8/9804.17/JDF) id QAA06646; Mon, 4 May 1998 16:09:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <19980504160954.47108@cybernothing.org> Date: Mon, 4 May 1998 16:09:54 -0700 From: "J.D. Falk" To: Frank Mayhar Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Status of DPT driver in 2.2-stable? References: <199805041753.KAA12832@exit.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88 In-Reply-To: <199805041753.KAA12832@exit.com>; from Frank Mayhar on Mon, May 04, 1998 at 10:53:39AM -0700 X-Editor: nvi X-Comment: Stop e-mail spam for good! http://www.cauce.org/ Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On 05/04/98, Frank Mayhar wrote: > I have an ISP that wants to use a DPT controller in a production Usenet News > machine. I see from the hackers archive that a driver for that controller > is in -stable, but wanted to know about folk's experiences with it. Any > problems? Can I recommend it, or should I recommend another controller? We've been using a few at vix.com for a while now, all on BSDI machines...no major problems, though I would suggest keeping an eye on the DPT web site for firmware upgrades, 'cause that seems to be the only place where they'll ever admit to having any bugs.... ---------========== J.D. Falk =========--------- | "There is no constitutional requirement that the incremental cost of | | sending massive quantities of unsolicited advertisements must be | | borne by the recipients." | | -- Judge Graham, Compuserve vs. Cyber Promotions | ----========== http://www.cybernothing.org/jdfalk/home.html ==========---- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 5 03:26:36 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA11785 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Tue, 5 May 1998 03:26:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from bastuba.partitur.se (bastuba.partitur.se [193.219.246.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA11777 for ; Tue, 5 May 1998 03:26:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from girgen@partitur.se) Received: from solist. (solist.partitur.se [193.219.246.204]) by bastuba.partitur.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id MAA14903 for ; Tue, 5 May 1998 12:26:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from girgen@partitur.se) Received: from partitur.se by solist. (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id MAA01386; Tue, 5 May 1998 12:26:14 +0200 Message-ID: <354EE946.FD6AA822@partitur.se> Date: Tue, 05 May 1998 12:26:14 +0200 From: Palle Girgensohn Organization: Partitur X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (X11; I; SunOS 5.5.1 sun4u) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: de0: receive: bad crc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Hi! I occasionally get read crc errors on an SMC card using de0. Shall I be concerned? It seems to happen only from 3com 3c905 cards, running both on windows and on FreeBSD 2.2.6. I know there's problem with the card on FreeBSSD in 100 Mbps, but this is in 10 Mpbs. Ther SMC card runs in 100 Mbps. /palle >dmesg Copyright (c) 1992-1998 FreeBSD Inc. Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 2.2.6-STABLE #0: Tue Apr 28 09:17:47 CEST 1998 kudo@trumpet.partitur.se:/usr/src/sys/compile/PALLETRUMPET CPU: Pentium Pro (198.95-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x617 Stepping=7 Features=0xfbff real memory = 134217728 (131072K bytes) avail memory = 129015808 (125992K bytes) Probing for devices on PCI bus 0: chip0 rev 2 on pci0:0:0 chip1 rev 0 on pci0:7:0 chip2 rev 0 on pci0:7:1 de0 rev 32 int a irq 9 on pci0:11:0 de0: SMC 9332BDT 21140A [10-100Mb/s] pass 2.0 de0: address 00:00:c0:27:eb:e9 vga0 rev 84 int a irq 10 on pci0:12:0 ahc0 rev 0 int a irq 11 on pci0:13:0 ahc0: aic7880 Wide Channel, SCSI Id=7, 16/255 SCBs ahc0 waiting for scsi devices to settle ahc0: target 0 Tagged Queuing Device (ahc0:0:0): "SEAGATE ST32155W 0528" type 0 fixed SCSI 2 sd0(ahc0:0:0): Direct-Access 2049MB (4197405 512 byte sectors) ahc0: target 1 Tagged Queuing Device (ahc0:1:0): "IBM DCAS-34330W S65A" type 0 fixed SCSI 2 sd1(ahc0:1:0): Direct-Access 4134MB (8467200 512 byte sectors) ahc0: target 2 Tagged Queuing Device (ahc0:2:0): "IBM DCAS-34330W S65A" type 0 fixed SCSI 2 sd2(ahc0:2:0): Direct-Access 4134MB (8467200 512 byte sectors) (ahc0:5:0): "CONNER CTT8000-S 1.07" type 1 removable SCSI 2 st0(ahc0:5:0): Sequential-Access density code 0x45, drive empty Probing for PnP devices: No Plug-n-Play devices were found Probing for devices on the ISA bus: sc0 at 0x60-0x6f irq 1 on motherboard sc0: VGA color <7 virtual consoles, flags=0x0> sio0 at 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 on isa sio0: type 16550A sio1 at 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa sio1: type 16550A lpt0 at 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa lpt0: Interrupt-driven port lp0: TCP/IP capable interface psm0 at 0x60-0x64 irq 12 on motherboard psm0: model Generic PS/2 mouse, device ID 0 fdc0 at 0x3f0-0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold fd0: 1.44MB 3.5in wdc0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7 irq 14 on isa wdc0: unit 0 (atapi): , removable, dma, iordy wcd0: 687Kb/sec, 240Kb cache, audio play, 2 volume levels, ejectable tray wcd0: 120mm data disc loaded, unlocked npx0 flags 0x1 on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface de0: enabling 100baseTX port de0: abnormal interrupt: transmit underflow (raising TX threshold to 96|256) de0: abnormal interrupt: transmit underflow (raising TX threshold to 8|512) de0: abnormal interrupt: transmit underflow (raising TX threshold to 1024) de0: receive: 00:60:97:9a:b9:ba: bad crc de0: receive: 00:60:97:9a:b9:ba: bad crc de0: receive: 00:60:97:9a:b9:ba: bad crc de0: receive: 00:60:97:9a:b9:ba: bad crc de0: receive: 00:60:97:4b:a0:19: bad crc and >ifconfig de0 de0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 193.219.246.210 netmask 0xffffffc0 broadcast 193.219.246.255 atalk 65280.213 range 0-65534 phase 2 broadcast 0.255 ether 00:00:c0:27:eb:e9 media: autoselect (100baseTX) status: active To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 5 05:30:32 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA01784 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Tue, 5 May 1998 05:30:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from localhost.pumpkin.kansai.oki.co.jp (oosk18DU28.osk.mesh.ad.jp [133.205.79.58]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA01750 for ; Tue, 5 May 1998 05:30:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from root@localhost.pumpkin.kansai.oki.co.jp) Received: from localhost (localhost.pumpkin.kansai.oki.co.jp [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.pumpkin.kansai.oki.co.jp (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA00454 for ; Tue, 5 May 1998 21:30:28 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from root@localhost.pumpkin.kansai.oki.co.jp) Message-Id: <199805051230.VAA00454@localhost.pumpkin.kansai.oki.co.jp> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: mount_msdos and msdosfs for VFAT/FAT32 access From: Hideki Yamamoto X-Mailer: Mew version 1.70 on Emacs 19.28.1 / Mule 2.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 05 May 1998 21:30:28 +0900 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Hi, I ported msdosfs and mount_msdos source code from FreeBSD-current to FreeBSD-2.2.X and put them on my web, http://members.aol.com/hyama99/. By using the above modules, you can read/write files on VFAT and FAT32 file system on FreeBSD-2.2.X as on FreeBSD-current. It seems to me that they are stable. Would you please test them? Thanks in advance. --------------------------------- Hideki Yamamoto (hyama@acm.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 5 05:47:50 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA04240 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Tue, 5 May 1998 05:47:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from unix2.it-datacntr.louisville.edu (unix2.it-datacntr.louisville.edu [136.165.4.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA04235 for ; Tue, 5 May 1998 05:47:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from k.stevenson@louisville.edu) Received: from homer.louisville.edu (ktstev01@homer.it-datacntr.louisville.edu [136.165.1.20]) by unix2.it-datacntr.louisville.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA74336 for ; Tue, 5 May 1998 08:47:43 -0400 Received: (from ktstev01@localhost) by homer.louisville.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA00307; Tue, 5 May 1998 08:47:42 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <19980505084742.B28992@homer.louisville.edu> Date: Tue, 5 May 1998 08:47:42 -0400 From: Keith Stevenson To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Problem with Toshiba XM-6201TA SCSI CDROM Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Just a follow-up for anyone who is interested: I placed a jaz drive on the affected SCSI controller and was able to use it without any problems. The problems also stop when I disconnect the CDROM drive. Looks like I'm in the market for a new CDROM drive :( Thanks to everyone who helped diagnose this, --Keith-- -- Keith Stevenson System Programmer - Data Center Services - University of Louisville k.stevenson@louisville.edu PGP key fingerprint = 4B 29 A8 95 A8 82 EA A2 29 CE 68 DE FC EE B6 A0 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 5 14:28:40 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA15669 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Tue, 5 May 1998 14:28:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from unagi.cybernothing.org (www.netpress.org [209.133.38.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA15635 for ; Tue, 5 May 1998 14:28:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdfalk@unagi.cybernothing.org) Received: (from jdfalk@localhost) by unagi.cybernothing.org (8.8.8/8.8.8/9804.17/JDF) id OAA20145; Tue, 5 May 1998 14:28:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <19980505142802.31625@cybernothing.org> Date: Tue, 5 May 1998 14:28:02 -0700 From: "J.D. Falk" To: Palle Girgensohn Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: de0: receive: bad crc References: <354EE946.FD6AA822@partitur.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88 In-Reply-To: <354EE946.FD6AA822@partitur.se>; from Palle Girgensohn on Tue, May 05, 1998 at 12:26:14PM +0200 X-Editor: nvi X-Comment: Stop e-mail spam for good! http://www.cauce.org/ Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On 05/05/98, Palle Girgensohn wrote: > I occasionally get read crc errors on an SMC card using de0. Shall I be > concerned? > > It seems to happen only from 3com 3c905 cards, running both on windows > and on FreeBSD 2.2.6. I know there's problem with the card on FreeBSSD > in 100 Mbps, but this is in 10 Mpbs. > > Ther SMC card runs in 100 Mbps. I was getting a lot of those with a de card (made by Bay Networks, using a DEC chipset, at 10 mbps), but it looks like it fixed itself after I upgraded to the most recent -STABLE yesterday morning. ---------========== J.D. Falk =========--------- | "How come two middle-aged hippies in L.A. can completely | | determine the fate of the global networking infrastructure? | | Because we've got the bomb." -- Todd Graham Lewis | ----========== http://www.cybernothing.org/jdfalk/home.html ==========---- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 5 23:24:00 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA20718 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Tue, 5 May 1998 23:24:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from natsoft.com.au (natsoft.com.au [203.39.138.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA20673 for ; Tue, 5 May 1998 23:23:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from craig@natsoft.com.au) Received: from Win95.natsoft.com.au (Win95 [203.39.138.131]) by natsoft.com.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA02290 for ; Wed, 6 May 1998 17:25:43 GMT Message-ID: <35500195.4147@natsoft.com.au> Date: Wed, 06 May 1998 16:22:13 +1000 From: Craig Wilson Organization: National Software Pty Ltd X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04 (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk I am currently using FreeBSD 2.2.2-RELEASE in several commercial sites, ie running companies accounting and point of sale systems. I have found FreeBSD 2.2.2 very stable, however would like to use 2.2.6. I am not in a position to use CVS or to make worlds etc, because of the number of commercial sites I have, approx 25, some of which are required to run 24 hours a day, I simply install from CD-ROM, apply a few patches, and then leave the computer alone. Could somebody please tell me whether the fixes to the following problem reports made it into FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE, and if they did not make it what the fixes are, and whether the problems are serious and need fixing. Also are there any other problems that should be fixed with FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE before putting it into a commercial situation. kern/4844 VM lookup, endless loop in vm_map_lookup_lookup_entry() this PR was closed on Apr26 1998 kern/6258 VM lookup on kernel map........ this PR was closed on Apr26 1998 Thanks in advance for any information supplied. Regards Craig Wilson National Software Pty Ltd To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 6 00:53:05 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA02656 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 6 May 1998 00:53:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from snitterly.nanoteq.co.za (snitterly.nanoteq.co.za [196.37.90.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA02630 for ; Wed, 6 May 1998 00:52:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pvl@nanoteq.com) Received: from groenie.nanoteq.co.za (groenie.nanoteq.co.za [196.37.91.45]) by snitterly.nanoteq.co.za (8.8.3/8.8.3) with SMTP id JAA17646; Wed, 6 May 1998 09:54:10 GMT Received: by groenie.nanoteq.co.za with Microsoft Mail id <01BD78D4.51C448E0@groenie.nanoteq.co.za>; Wed, 6 May 1998 09:49:53 +0200 Message-ID: <01BD78D4.51C448E0@groenie.nanoteq.co.za> From: "P. van Leeuwen" To: "'law@cygnus.com'" , Joe Buck Cc: "pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at" , "freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG" , "obrien@NUXI.com" , "egcs@cygnus.com" Subject: RE: GCC Date: Wed, 6 May 1998 09:49:52 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk OK, you guys have convinced me. I use exceptions, so as soon as I can get egcs installed, I'll take it for a testdrive. Are there any problems on FreeBSD? What is the current stable release (does that make sense :) ) ? cheers Pierre Pierre-Andre van Leeuwen Electronic Engineer Nanoteq (Pty) Ltd http://www.nanoteq.com pvl@nanoteq.com Ph: +27 12 665-1338 Fax: +27 12 665-1343 -----Original Message----- From: Jeffrey A Law [SMTP:law@hurl.cygnus.com] Sent: 04 May 1998 22:24 To: Joe Buck Cc: pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at; freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; obrien@NUXI.com; egcs@cygnus.com Subject: Re: GCC In message <199805041610.JAA18839@atrus.synopsys.com>you write: > > > > In production shops, I've seen a lot more places go to gcc 2.8.1 > > > than EGCS, so I feel gcc/g++ is better tested and stable. > > > > Guys like Joe Buck , author of the "FAQ for g++ > > and libg++", happen to disagree: > > > > [EGCS 1.0.x] is considerably more stable than 2.8.1 and vastly > > more stable than the gcc2 snapshots [...] > > My statement above applies to C++. For C, I'd say gcc 2.8.1 seems fine. I suspect egcs-1.0.x to be more stable than 2.8.1 for C code too, but the cases where one would notice are more obscure. For example we've fixed quite a few bugs exposed by glibc. Most of the bugs are probably in gcc-2.8.1. The symptoms of those bugs are such that folks are less likely to notice them. An interesting exercise would be to run the testsuite from the development tree against gcc-2.8.1 and the upcoming egcs-1.0.3 release :-) I'd bet egcs performs better than gcc-2.7 and gcc-2.8 on most if not all significant targets. > I would be very cautious > about shipping any C++ code that uses exceptions with 2.8.1. Those > false warnings you get with -O and -Wall are due to gcc 2.8.1's faulty > control flow analysis, and that faulty analysis is used as the basis > of optimization. Yup. And the person in charge of gcc2 has rejected our suggestions for fixing the inaccuracies in the cfg. gcc2 relies on some rather fragile code to avoid incorrect code with optimization and EH. I'm not convinced that code will work right with the existing gcc2 optimizations. I know it will not work with the additional optimizations already in egcs. Our scheme of computing an accurate cfg works and will continue to work as egcs continues to implement more aggressive optimizers. > Those of us on both lists who see the reports know that the egcs testing > has been more thorough that the gcc 2.8.x testing. Absolutely. egcs-1.0.x went through much more rigorous testing than gcc-2.8.x. But since the gcc2 lists are not public most folks are not aware of how little testing went into gcc-2.8. > gcc -fno-exceptions for gcc 2.8.1 is probably fine. The scandal is that > the story FSF has put out as to why gcc 2.8.x took so long had to do with > exceptions -- and they *still* haven't gotten it right. Yup. Sad really. jeff To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 6 01:18:52 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA07851 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 6 May 1998 01:18:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from relay.nuxi.com (nuxi.cs.ucdavis.edu [128.120.56.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA07820 for ; Wed, 6 May 1998 01:18:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by relay.nuxi.com (8.8.7/8.6.12) id IAA27863; Wed, 6 May 1998 08:00:09 GMT Message-ID: <19980506010009.51285@nuxi.com> Date: Wed, 6 May 1998 01:00:09 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: "P. van Leeuwen" Cc: "'law@cygnus.com'" , Joe Buck , "pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at" , "freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG" , "egcs@cygnus.com" Subject: Re: GCC Reply-To: obrien@NUXI.com References: <01BD78D4.51C448E0@groenie.nanoteq.co.za> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88 In-Reply-To: <01BD78D4.51C448E0@groenie.nanoteq.co.za>; from P. van Leeuwen on Wed, May 06, 1998 at 09:49:52AM +0200 X-Warning: Mutt Bites! X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 2.2.5-STABLE Organization: The NUXI *BSD group X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Keyid: 34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > OK, you guys have convinced me. I use exceptions, so as soon as I can > get egcs installed, I'll take it for a testdrive. Are there any > problems on FreeBSD? > What is the current stable release (does that make sense :) ) ? 1.0.3 will be... but it won't do for you out of the box as gcc/config/i386/freebsd.h isn't for exceptions to work properly. You will have to always use ``g++ -fsjlj-exceptions''. This has been fixed in the development branch since late March, but for some reason wasn't brought into the "release" branch. It appears 1.0.3 is a Linux-only release as it only address problems Linux users had. -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.ucdavis.edu -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 6 01:48:38 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA12873 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 6 May 1998 01:48:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from natsoft.com.au (natsoft.com.au [203.39.138.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA12858 for ; Wed, 6 May 1998 01:48:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from craig@natsoft.com.au) Received: from Win95.natsoft.com.au (Win95 [203.39.138.131]) by natsoft.com.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA02594 for ; Wed, 6 May 1998 19:50:27 GMT Message-ID: <35502381.7A27@natsoft.com.au> Date: Wed, 06 May 1998 18:46:57 +1000 From: Craig Wilson Organization: National Software Pty Ltd X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04 (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk I am currently using FreeBSD 2.2.2-RELEASE in several commercial sites, ie running companies accounting and point of sale systems. I have found FreeBSD 2.2.2 very stable, however would like to use 2.2.6. I am not in a position to use CVS or to make worlds etc, because of the number of commercial sites I have, approx 25, some of which are required to run 24 hours a day, I simply install from CD-ROM, apply a few patches, and then leave the computer alone. Could somebody please tell me whether the fixes to the following problem reports made it into FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE, and if they did not make it what the fixes are, and whether the problems are serious and need fixing. Also are there any other problems that should be fixed with FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE before putting it into a commercial situation. kern/4844 VM lookup, endless loop in vm_map_lookup_lookup_entry() this PR was closed on Apr26 1998 kern/6258 VM lookup on kernel map........ this PR was closed on Apr26 1998 Thanks in advance for any information supplied. Regards Craig Wilson National Software Pty Ltd To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 6 07:53:56 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA10264 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 6 May 1998 07:53:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at [128.130.111.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA10244 for ; Wed, 6 May 1998 07:53:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at) Received: from alcyone (alcyone.dbai.tuwien.ac.at [128.130.111.54]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id QAA08769; Wed, 6 May 1998 16:53:29 +0200 (MET-DST) Date: Wed, 6 May 1998 16:53:26 +0200 (MET DST) From: Gerald Pfeifer X-Sender: pfeifer@alcyone.dbai.tuwien.ac.at To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, egcs@cygnus.com cc: "David O'Brien" , "P. van Leeuwen" , law@cygnus.com, Joe Buck Subject: Re: GCC In-Reply-To: <19980506010009.51285@nuxi.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Wed, 6 May 1998, David O'Brien wrote: > This has been fixed in the development branch since late March, but > for some reason wasn't brought into the "release" branch. The 1.0.x branch is quite stable, but essentially ``dead''. There will, however, soon be a new release branch 1.1.x from the current development branch. > It appears 1.0.3 is a Linux-only release as it only address problems > Linux users had. There (most probably) wouldn't have been a 1.0.3 hadn't RedHat decided to use egcs for its next distribution. egcs really isn't Linux-only or even Linux-centered -- Just look at the number of platforms the various contributors are using! -- but clearly this is a very good chance of getting good publicity and a wide distribution. Gerald -- Gerald Pfeifer (Jerry) Vienna University of Technology pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 6 08:08:33 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA12294 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 6 May 1998 08:08:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from softweyr.com ([204.68.178.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA12270 for ; Wed, 6 May 1998 08:08:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from softweyr.com (localhost.softweyr.com [127.0.0.1]) by softweyr.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA29867; Wed, 6 May 1998 09:08:07 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Message-ID: <35507CD7.451C1EC7@softweyr.com> Date: Wed, 06 May 1998 09:08:07 -0600 From: Wes Peters Organization: Softweyr llc X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gerald Pfeifer CC: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, egcs@cygnus.com Subject: Re: GCC References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > egcs really isn't Linux-only or even Linux-centered -- Just look at > the number of platforms the various contributors are using! -- but > clearly this is a very good chance of getting good publicity and a > wide distribution. And I though egcs was RTEMS-centric. ;^) -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC http://www.softweyr.com/~softweyr wes@softweyr.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 6 10:07:58 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA01183 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 6 May 1998 10:07:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (passer.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.110.29]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA01165; Wed, 6 May 1998 10:07:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cschuber@passer.osg.gov.bc.ca) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.8.8/8.6.10) id KAA16486; Wed, 6 May 1998 10:07:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199805061707.KAA16486@passer.osg.gov.bc.ca> Received: from localhost(127.0.0.1), claiming to be "passer.osg.gov.bc.ca" via SMTP by localhost, id smtpdaapcDa; Wed May 6 10:07:05 1998 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96 Reply-to: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group X-Sender: cschuber To: Craig Wilson cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, dyson@FreeBSD.ORG, dillon@best.net, dg@root.com, cschuber@uumail.gov.bc.ca Subject: Re: FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 06 May 1998 16:22:13 +1000." <35500195.4147@natsoft.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 06 May 1998 10:04:50 -0700 From: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > Could somebody please tell me whether the fixes to the following problem > reports made it into FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE, and if they did not make > it what the fixes are, and whether the problems are serious and need > fixing. Also are there any other problems that should be fixed with > FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE before putting it into a commercial situation. I've experienced kern/5117 and kern/6102 under 2.2.5 and 2.2.6. This problem, a "biodone: buffer not busy" panic, occurs under heavy I/O load to SCSI devices (disk drive, CDROM drive, 4mm tape drive, and Zip disk drive), especially when most/all are being heavily used simultaneously. Heavy use of the two EIDE disks on the same system doesn't cause a panic. In every case the Zip drive was writing during the course of panic. > > kern/4844 VM lookup, endless loop in vm_map_lookup_lookup_entry() > this PR was closed on Apr26 1998 > > kern/6258 VM lookup on kernel map........ > this PR was closed on Apr26 1998 I've been using a vfs_bio.c that John Dyson had posted to -stable since December. It's fixed the problem for me. His fix was different from the one in kern/6258. Since you've got my curiosity piqued, I'll have to examine the differences. > Regards Craig Wilson > National Software Pty Ltd Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Open Systems Group Internet: cschuber@uumail.gov.bc.ca ITSD Cy.Schubert@gems8.gov.bc.ca Government of BC To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 6 11:39:35 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA19281 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 6 May 1998 11:39:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from vespucci.advicom.net (root@vespucci.advicom.net [199.170.120.42]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA19234 for ; Wed, 6 May 1998 11:39:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from joel@OARcorp.com) Received: from localhost (joel@localhost) by vespucci.advicom.net (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA05188; Wed, 6 May 1998 13:39:01 -0500 (CDT) X-Envelope-Recipient: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 6 May 1998 13:38:59 -0500 (CDT) From: Joel Sherrill X-Sender: joel@vespucci.advicom.net To: Wes Peters cc: Gerald Pfeifer , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, egcs@cygnus.com Subject: Re: GCC In-Reply-To: <35507CD7.451C1EC7@softweyr.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Wed, 6 May 1998, Wes Peters wrote: > Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > > egcs really isn't Linux-only or even Linux-centered -- Just look at > > the number of platforms the various contributors are using! -- but > > clearly this is a very good chance of getting good publicity and a > > wide distribution. > > And I though egcs was RTEMS-centric. ;^) I'm flattered to even rate a joke. I did not think anything except RTEMS was RTEMS-centric. :) One of the (few) problems with free software is that the authors don't know who all is using their work. I know of many RTEMS applications but am sure I don't know everyone using it. Jf you are using RTEMS and have not said hi to us, we encourage you to do so. --joel Joel Sherrill Director of Research & Development joel@OARcorp.com On-Line Applications Research Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805 Support Available (205) 722-9985 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 6 12:29:26 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA29612 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 6 May 1998 12:29:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pop.uniserve.com (pop.uniserve.com [204.244.156.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id MAA29530 for ; Wed, 6 May 1998 12:29:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tom@uniserve.com) Received: from shell.uniserve.ca [204.244.186.218] by pop.uniserve.com with smtp (Exim 1.82 #4) id 0yX9s9-0001DF-00; Wed, 6 May 1998 12:28:57 -0700 Date: Wed, 6 May 1998 12:28:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom X-Sender: tom@shell.uniserve.ca To: "J.D. Falk" cc: Palle Girgensohn , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: de0: receive: bad crc In-Reply-To: <19980505142802.31625@cybernothing.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Tue, 5 May 1998, J.D. Falk wrote: > On 05/05/98, Palle Girgensohn wrote: > > > I occasionally get read crc errors on an SMC card using de0. Shall I be > > concerned? > > > > It seems to happen only from 3com 3c905 cards, running both on windows > > and on FreeBSD 2.2.6. I know there's problem with the card on FreeBSSD > > in 100 Mbps, but this is in 10 Mpbs. > > > > Ther SMC card runs in 100 Mbps. > > I was getting a lot of those with a de card (made by Bay > Networks, using a DEC chipset, at 10 mbps), but it looks like > it fixed itself after I upgraded to the most recent -STABLE > yesterday morning. Probably not. As I recall, a feature was added to the de drive to log CRC errors, and later this feature was disabled. So the CRC errors have probably always been there, and are still there now. A few CRC errors should be harmless. You can check netstat for the current number of output and input errors. Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 6 15:23:17 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA03344 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 6 May 1998 15:23:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from cygnus.com (runyon.cygnus.com [205.180.230.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA03248 for ; Wed, 6 May 1998 15:22:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wilson@cygnus.com) Received: from rtl.cygnus.com (rtl.cygnus.com [205.180.230.21]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA11807; Wed, 6 May 1998 15:17:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: (wilson@localhost) by rtl.cygnus.com (8.6.12/8.6.4) id PAA04453; Wed, 6 May 1998 15:17:43 -0700 Message-Id: <199805062217.PAA04453@rtl.cygnus.com> To: obrien@NUXI.com cc: "P. van Leeuwen" , "'law@cygnus.com'" , Joe Buck , "pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at" , "freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG" , "egcs@cygnus.com" Subject: Re: GCC In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 06 May 1998 01:00:09 PDT." <19980506010009.51285@nuxi.com> Date: Wed, 06 May 1998 15:17:42 -0700 From: Jim Wilson Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk This has been fixed in the development branch since late March, but for some reason wasn't brought into the "release" branch. FYI `release branch' probably means something completely different to the FreeBSD folks than the EGCS folks. This is perhaps why you are confused. FreeBSD has a release branch and a development branch, and work progresses on them in parallel. EGCS has only a single source tree, the development tree, and releases are branches from the development tree. There was a branch for the egcs-1.0.x release, and there will be another branch for the egcs-1.1.x release soon. There is no such thing as "the release branch" such as FreeBSD has, so there is no point in asking us to add patches to it. However, since the FreeBSD patches are in our development tree, they will automatically be in the next release branch, for the egcs-1.1.x releases. The patches aren't in the egcs-1.0.x release branch because that was frozen months ago, and the patches came too late for that. It appears 1.0.3 is a Linux-only release as it only address problems Linux users had. It addresses problems from one specific Linux distributor, which needed to be fixed before egcs could be the primary compiler for their next CD-ROM distribution. However, considering that several of the changes are bug fixes in the x86 port, it would likely be just as useful to FreeBSD users also. Jim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 6 15:56:53 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA10358 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 6 May 1998 15:56:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from cassatt.afax.com (cassatt.afax.com [208.220.115.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id PAA10333 for ; Wed, 6 May 1998 15:56:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brantk@afax.com) Received: (qmail 24561 invoked from network); 6 May 1998 22:56:05 -0000 Received: from atlas-251.atlas.com (HELO brantk.atlas.com) (206.29.170.251) by cassatt.afax.com with SMTP; 6 May 1998 22:56:05 -0000 Received: by brantk.atlas.com with Microsoft Mail id <01BD7907.911757C0@brantk.atlas.com>; Wed, 6 May 1998 15:56:44 -0700 Message-ID: <01BD7907.911757C0@brantk.atlas.com> From: Brant Katkansky To: "'stable@freebsd.org'" Cc: "'jkh@time.cdrom.com'" Subject: Problems with anoncvs.freebsd.org Date: Wed, 6 May 1998 15:56:25 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Any ideas? This is on a freshly installed 2.2.6-RELEASE box, very few frills added. $ CVSROOT=anoncvs@anoncvs.freebsd.org:/cvs; export CVSROOT $ cvs co ls rsh: warning, using standard rsh: remote host doesn't support Kerberos select: protocol failure in circuit setup cvs [checkout aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if any) $ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 6 17:34:16 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA26926 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 6 May 1998 17:34:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from cesit1.unifi.it (cesit1.unifi.it [150.217.1.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA26848 for ; Wed, 6 May 1998 17:33:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ugo@dsi.UNIFI.IT) Received: from aguirre.dsi.unifi.it by CESIT1.UNIFI.IT (PMDF V5.1-10 #23168) with SMTP id <01IWQI9M2XDQ000218@CESIT1.UNIFI.IT> for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 7 May 1998 02:34:12 MET Received: from dsi.unifi.it (com1.unifi.it) by aguirre.dsi.unifi.it (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA15170; Mon, 04 May 1998 23:22:05 +0200 Received: from pegasus.home.net (pegasus.home.net [192.168.1.3]) by dsi.unifi.it (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA21150; Wed, 06 May 1998 23:59:43 +0200 (MET DST envelope-from ugo) Received: (from ugo@localhost) by pegasus.home.net (8.8.8/8.8.7) id XAA00306; Wed, 06 May 1998 23:59:48 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Wed, 06 May 1998 23:59:48 +0200 (MET DST) From: Ugo Paternostro Subject: RE: mount_msdos and msdosfs for VFAT/FAT32 access In-reply-to: <199805051230.VAA00454@localhost.pumpkin.kansai.oki.co.jp> To: Hideki Yamamoto Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Message-id: Organization: Not an organization MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XFMail 1.2 [p0] on FreeBSD Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_=XFMail.1.2.p0.FreeBSD:980506235948:230=_" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk This message is in MIME format --_=XFMail.1.2.p0.FreeBSD:980506235948:230=_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On 05-May-98 Hideki Yamamoto wrote about "mount_msdos and msdosfs for VFAT/FAT32 access": > I ported msdosfs and mount_msdos source code from FreeBSD-current > to FreeBSD-2.2.X and put them on my web, http://members.aol.com/hyama99/. Thank-you very much! > It seems to me that they are stable. > Would you please test them? Testing... :-) I have only two little reports, so far: 1) you sys/sys/mount.h file is outdated, as it does not include CodaFS support. You find a patch attached below. (P.S.: last make world 22nd Apr, sources supped today at 16:30 UTC) 2) my system rebooted fine (no errors on console), but when I try to mount my Windows 95 partition with: mount -t msdos /dev/wd0s2 /mnt/windows95 I get: May 6 23:37:53 pegasus mountd[110]: Can't change attributes for /mnt/limbo. May 6 23:37:53 pegasus mountd[110]: Bad exports list line /mnt/limbo -maproot May 6 23:37:53 pegasus mountd[110]: Can't change attributes for /mnt/xchange_1. May 6 23:37:53 pegasus mountd[110]: Bad exports list line /mnt/xchange_1 -maproot (sorry for cut&paste weirdness) mount reports: ugo@pegasus:/home/ugo [0]# mount /dev/wd0s3a on / (asynchronous, NFS exported, local, noatime) /dev/wd0s3f on /usr (asynchronous, NFS exported, local, noatime) /dev/wd0s3e on /var (asynchronous, local, noatime) procfs on /proc (local) kernfs on /kern (local) /dev/wd0s1 on /mnt/dos (local) /dev/wd0s5 on /mnt/limbo (NFS exported, local) /dev/wd2s1 on /mnt/xchange_1 (NFS exported, local) /dev/wd2s2f on /mnt/xchange_2 (asynchronous, NFS exported, local, noatime) medusa:/var/mail on /var/mail medusa:/var/db/pkg on /var/db/pkg medusa:/var/spool/fax on /var/spool/fax medusa:/usr/home on /usr/home medusa:/usr/local on /usr/local medusa:/usr/share on /usr/share amd:131 on /amd /dev/wd0s2 on /mnt/windows95 (local) and my /etc/exports file is: /mnt/cdrom medusa.home.net hydra.home.net chimaera.home.net /mnt/limbo -maproot=root medusa.home.net hydra.home.net chimaera.home.net /mnt/xchange_1 -maproot=root medusa.home.net hydra.home.net chimaera.home.net /mnt/xchange_2 -maproot=root medusa.home.net hydra.home.net chimaera.home.net /usr -alldirs -maproot=root medusa.home.net hydra.home.net chimaera.home.net (don't mind -maproot, I know, I love to live dangerously, but this is a private LAN with just 4 computers...) of course, I lost two exports and showmount -e shows: ugo@pegasus:/home/ugo [0]# showmount -e Exports list on localhost: /usr medusa.home.net hydra.home.net chimaera.home.net /mnt/xchange_2 medusa.home.net hydra.home.net chimaera.home.net /mnt/cdrom medusa.home.net hydra.home.net chimaera.home.net Any hint? > Thanks in advance. Are you kidding? ;-) Many thanks to you, instead. I think you made a good work, keep on going! I really needed this. (Hint to committers :-) > Hideki Yamamoto (hyama@acm.org) Bye, UP --_=XFMail.1.2.p0.FreeBSD:980506235948:230=_ Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="mount.h.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Description: mount.h.diff Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=mount.h.diff; SizeOnDisk=1007 LS0tIG1vdW50Lmgub3JpZwlNb24gTWF5ICA0IDE2OjI0OjI5IDE5OTgKKysrIG1vdW50LmgJV2Vk IE1heSAgNiAyMzoyMTo1NiAxOTk4CkBAIC0zMSw3ICszMSw3IEBACiAgKiBTVUNIIERBTUFHRS4K ICAqCiAgKglAKCMpbW91bnQuaAk4LjEzIChCZXJrZWxleSkgMy8yNy85NAotICoJJElkOiBtb3Vu dC5oLHYgMS4zNC4yLjEgMTk5Ny8wOC8xNyAxMzozMzo0MyBqb2VyZyBFeHAgJAorICoJJElkOiBt b3VudC5oLHYgMS4zNC4yLjMgMTk5OC8wMi8yMiAwMToxNzoyMCBqa2ggRXhwICQKICAqLwogCiAj aWZuZGVmIF9TWVNfTU9VTlRfSF8KQEAgLTEwMiw3ICsxMDIsOCBAQAogI2RlZmluZSBNT1VOVF9E RVZGUwkxNgkvKiBleGlzdGluZyBkZXZpY2UgRmlsZXN5c3RlbSAqLwogI2RlZmluZQlNT1VOVF9F WFQyRlMJMTcJLyogTGludXggRVhUMkZTICovCiAjZGVmaW5lIE1PVU5UX1RGUwkxOAkvKiBOZXRj b24gTm92ZWxsIGZpbGVzeXN0ZW0gKi8KLSNkZWZpbmUJTU9VTlRfTUFYVFlQRQkxOAorI2RlZmlu ZQlNT1VOVF9DRlMJMTkJLyogQ29kYSBmaWxlc3lzdGVtICovCisjZGVmaW5lCU1PVU5UX01BWFRZ UEUJMTkKIAogI2RlZmluZSBJTklUTU9VTlROQU1FUyB7IFwKIAkibm9uZSIsCQkvKiAgMCBNT1VO VF9OT05FICovIFwKQEAgLTEyNCw3ICsxMjUsOCBAQAogCSJkZXZmcyIsCS8qIDE2IE1PVU5UX0RF VkZTICovIFwKIAkiZXh0MmZzIiwJLyogMTcgTU9VTlRfRVhUMkZTICovIFwKIAkidGZzIiwJCS8q IDE4IE1PVU5UX1RGUyAqLyBcCi0JMCwJCS8qIDE4IE1PVU5UX1NQQVJFICovIFwKKwkiY2ZzIiwJ CS8qIDE5IE1PVU5UX0NGUyAqLyBcCisJMCwJCS8qIDIwIE1PVU5UX1NQQVJFICovIFwKIH0KIAog LyoKQEAgLTQwMiw3ICs0MDQsNiBAQAogCXVfaW50OF90ICBkMnVbMTI4XTsgICAgIC8qIERPUy0+ bG9jYWwgdGFibGUgKi8KIAl1X2ludDhfdCAgdTJkWzEyOF07ICAgICAvKiBMb2NhbC0+RE9TIHRh YmxlICovCiB9OwotCiAjZW5kaWYKIAogI2lmZGVmIENEOTY2MAo= --_=XFMail.1.2.p0.FreeBSD:980506235948:230=_-- End of MIME message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 6 18:48:42 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA09395 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 6 May 1998 18:48:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA09305; Wed, 6 May 1998 18:48:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA26797; Wed, 6 May 1998 18:48:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: Brant Katkansky cc: "'stable@freebsd.org'" , nate@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Problems with anoncvs.freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 06 May 1998 15:56:25 PDT." <01BD7907.911757C0@brantk.atlas.com> Date: Wed, 06 May 1998 18:48:00 -0700 Message-ID: <26794.894505680@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk We're working on this as we speak, and I believe Nate even got the pserver stuff (which works a lot better) up and running. He was also going to amend the docs to indicate this last I checked, but I haven't seen the commits to anoncvs.sgml go by yet. :-) - Jordan > Any ideas? This is on a freshly installed 2.2.6-RELEASE box, very few frills added. > > $ CVSROOT=anoncvs@anoncvs.freebsd.org:/cvs; export CVSROOT > $ cvs co ls > rsh: warning, using standard rsh: remote host doesn't support Kerberos > select: protocol failure in circuit setup > cvs [checkout aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if an y) > $ > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 6 20:24:40 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA25020 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 6 May 1998 20:24:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (sri-gw.MT.net [206.127.105.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA25013; Wed, 6 May 1998 20:24:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@mt.sri.com) Received: from mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by ns.mt.sri.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id VAA27006; Wed, 6 May 1998 21:24:28 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com) Received: by mt.sri.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id VAA07687; Wed, 6 May 1998 21:24:27 -0600 Date: Wed, 6 May 1998 21:24:27 -0600 Message-Id: <199805070324.VAA07687@mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: Brant Katkansky , "'stable@freebsd.org'" , nate@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Problems with anoncvs.freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <26794.894505680@time.cdrom.com> References: <01BD7907.911757C0@brantk.atlas.com> <26794.894505680@time.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.29 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > We're working on this as we speak, and I believe Nate even got the > pserver stuff (which works a lot better) up and running. I had it running, but w/out the bugfixes to CVS it's not going to work. Also, the FreeBSD repository needs some modifications to it that you wanted Peter to do, so it's not ready. > He was also going to amend the docs to indicate this last I checked, > but I haven't seen the commits to anoncvs.sgml go by yet. :-) True, but I didn't realize you wanted them done before CVS was fixed and changes were made to the repository. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 6 20:54:40 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA00511 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 6 May 1998 20:54:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from cassatt.afax.com (cassatt.afax.com [208.220.115.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id UAA00502 for ; Wed, 6 May 1998 20:54:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brantk@cassatt.afax.com) From: brantk@cassatt.afax.com Received: (qmail 25133 invoked by uid 1038); 7 May 1998 03:54:04 -0000 Date: 7 May 1998 03:54:04 -0000 Message-ID: <19980507035404.25132.qmail@cassatt.afax.com> To: brantk@afax.com, jkh@time.cdrom.com Subject: Re: Problems with anoncvs.freebsd.org Cc: nate@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Regarding the problems I was having with anoncvs, I tried it from home on a 2.2.5-RELEASE box, no problems. I'll try it from work on my other box when I go in tomorrow. Thanks for the info. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 6 21:51:55 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA11686 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 6 May 1998 21:51:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA11679 for ; Wed, 6 May 1998 21:51:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA27398; Wed, 6 May 1998 21:51:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: Ugo Paternostro cc: Hideki Yamamoto , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: mount_msdos and msdosfs for VFAT/FAT32 access In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 06 May 1998 23:59:48 +0200." Date: Wed, 06 May 1998 21:51:28 -0700 Message-ID: <27395.894516688@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > 2) my system rebooted fine (no errors on console), but when I try to mount my > Windows 95 partition with: This looks like you actually have a bogus entry in /etc/exports and is not a problem with the patches at all. Can you please verify? - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 6 21:54:38 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA12309 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 6 May 1998 21:54:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA12300; Wed, 6 May 1998 21:54:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA27413; Wed, 6 May 1998 21:54:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: Nate Williams cc: Brant Katkansky , "'stable@freebsd.org'" , nate@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Problems with anoncvs.freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 06 May 1998 21:24:27 MDT." <199805070324.VAA07687@mt.sri.com> Date: Wed, 06 May 1998 21:54:18 -0700 Message-ID: <27409.894516858@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > I had it running, but w/out the bugfixes to CVS it's not going to work. > Also, the FreeBSD repository needs some modifications to it that you > wanted Peter to do, so it's not ready. Sorry, I thought it was just an error when used incorrectly (e.g. user hits return rather than entering the "anonymous" password. > True, but I didn't realize you wanted them done before CVS was fixed and > changes were made to the repository. If it doesn't work at all yet, then yes, I agree with you that it should wait. :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu May 7 02:04:40 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA11534 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 7 May 1998 02:04:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gulipin.miee.ru (gulipin.miee.ru [194.226.0.64]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA11525 for ; Thu, 7 May 1998 02:04:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lister@miee.ru) Received: from gulipin.miee.ru (gulipin.miee.ru [194.226.0.64]) by gulipin.miee.ru (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id NAA20688 for ; Thu, 7 May 1998 13:03:03 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from lister@miee.ru) Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 13:03:03 +0400 (MSD) From: Mailing-list reader To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Problems with vidcontrol Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Hello! I have a annoying problem with vidcontrol. I use following commands in my .login file: vidcontrol VGA_80x30; tset cons30r. My system freeze and reboot after 10 seconds (approx.) in 30 percents of my login attempts. My system is PII/266 (ASUStek P2L97-DS dual motherboard, one CPU installed, termination card in second slot), My VideoCard is ASUS PCI-V264GT/Plus). uname -a: FreeBSD gulipin.miee.ru 2.2.6-RELEASE FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE #0: Mon May 4 23:42:15 MSD 1998 aidan@gulipin.miee.ru:/usr/src/sys/compile/TOPTYGIN i386 Sincerely Your Michael V. Smirnoff via Mailing List user account. mailto:mivs@miee.ru To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu May 7 09:22:24 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA11246 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 7 May 1998 09:22:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mailhost.iprg.nokia.com (mailhost.iprg.nokia.com [205.226.5.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA11192 for ; Thu, 7 May 1998 09:22:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from scott@iprg.nokia.com) Received: from melkor.iprg.nokia.com (melkor.iprg.nokia.com [205.226.1.82]) by mailhost.iprg.nokia.com (8.8.7/8.6.10) with SMTP id JAA01368; Thu, 7 May 1998 09:21:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3551E0C3.41C67EA6@iprg.nokia.com> Date: Thu, 07 May 1998 09:26:43 -0700 From: Scott Sewall Organization: Nokia Communications X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Upgrade comments Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Last night I upgraded my system from 2.2.5-RELEASE to 2.2.6-RELEASE. The upgrade generally went ok. Some comments. The UPGRADE.TXT file which came on the CD indicates that I would be prompted for a location "into which all files from /etc/ are saved." I don't recall seeing such a prompt. Previous copies of files such as /etc/passwd were simply overwritten. The file also mentions that the upgrade procedure "replaces the previous FreeBSD kernel with a GENERIC kernel." This was not the case. My 2.2.5 kernel was left as /kernel and the new 2.2.6 kernel was installed as /kernel.GENERIC. Has anyone else seen this behaviour? Thanks! -- Scott To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu May 7 11:41:41 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA06412 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 7 May 1998 11:41:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA06173 for ; Thu, 7 May 1998 11:40:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA08439; Thu, 7 May 1998 11:40:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: Scott Sewall cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Upgrade comments In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 07 May 1998 09:26:43 PDT." <3551E0C3.41C67EA6@iprg.nokia.com> Date: Thu, 07 May 1998 11:40:16 -0700 Message-ID: <8436.894566416@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > The UPGRADE.TXT file which came on the CD indicates that I would be > prompted for a location "into which all files from /etc/ are saved." > > I don't recall seeing such a prompt. Previous copies of files > such as /etc/passwd were simply overwritten. What?! Hmmm! That certainly didn't happen during my testing. Are you sure you chose "upgrade" and didn't simply install on top of the old system with a novice/express/custom install? :) > The file also mentions that the upgrade procedure "replaces the > previous FreeBSD kernel with a GENERIC kernel." This was not the > case. My 2.2.5 kernel was left as /kernel and the new 2.2.6 kernel > was installed as /kernel.GENERIC. Hmmmm again. This would be another symptom of not acutally chosing upgrade since only the upgrade option takes care to chflags the old bits so that they can be overwritten this way. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu May 7 13:00:15 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA20843 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 7 May 1998 13:00:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mailhost.iprg.nokia.com (mailhost.iprg.nokia.com [205.226.5.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA20649 for ; Thu, 7 May 1998 12:59:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from scott@iprg.nokia.com) Received: from melkor.iprg.nokia.com (melkor.iprg.nokia.com [205.226.1.82]) by mailhost.iprg.nokia.com (8.8.7/8.6.10) with SMTP id MAA07192; Thu, 7 May 1998 12:58:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <355213A4.2781E494@iprg.nokia.com> Date: Thu, 07 May 1998 13:03:48 -0700 From: Scott Sewall Organization: Nokia Communications X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" CC: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Upgrade comments References: <8436.894566416@time.cdrom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Looks like I selected install instead of upgrade. Sorry to be a bother. -- Scott Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > > The UPGRADE.TXT file which came on the CD indicates that I would be > > prompted for a location "into which all files from /etc/ are saved." > > > > I don't recall seeing such a prompt. Previous copies of files > > such as /etc/passwd were simply overwritten. > > What?! Hmmm! That certainly didn't happen during my testing. Are > you sure you chose "upgrade" and didn't simply install on top of the > old system with a novice/express/custom install? :) > > > The file also mentions that the upgrade procedure "replaces the > > previous FreeBSD kernel with a GENERIC kernel." This was not the > > case. My 2.2.5 kernel was left as /kernel and the new 2.2.6 kernel > > was installed as /kernel.GENERIC. > > Hmmmm again. This would be another symptom of not acutally chosing > upgrade since only the upgrade option takes care to chflags the old > bits so that they can be overwritten this way. > > - Jordan > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu May 7 13:39:31 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA28288 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 7 May 1998 13:39:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from cesit1.unifi.it (cesit1.unifi.it [150.217.1.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA28019 for ; Thu, 7 May 1998 13:37:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ugo@dsi.UNIFI.IT) Received: from aguirre.dsi.unifi.it by CESIT1.UNIFI.IT (PMDF V5.1-10 #23168) with SMTP id <01IWROBN3ZT00000TK@CESIT1.UNIFI.IT> for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 7 May 1998 22:38:25 MET Received: from dsi.unifi.it (com3.unifi.it) by aguirre.dsi.unifi.it (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA18354; Tue, 05 May 1998 19:26:27 +0200 Received: from pegasus.home.net (pegasus.home.net [192.168.1.3]) by dsi.unifi.it (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA24517; Thu, 07 May 1998 18:35:21 +0200 (MET DST envelope-from ugo) Received: (from ugo@localhost) by pegasus.home.net (8.8.8/8.8.7) id SAA00262; Thu, 07 May 1998 18:35:31 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Thu, 07 May 1998 18:35:31 +0200 (MET DST) From: Ugo Paternostro Subject: Re: mount_msdos and msdosfs for VFAT/FAT32 access In-reply-to: <27395.894516688@time.cdrom.com> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Hideki Yamamoto Message-id: Organization: Not an organization MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XFMail 1.2 [p0] on FreeBSD Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On 07-May-98 Jordan K. Hubbard wrote about "Re: mount_msdos and msdosfs for VFAT/FAT32 access": >> 2) my system rebooted fine (no errors on console), but when I try to mount >> my Windows 95 partition with: > > This looks like you actually have a bogus entry in /etc/exports and > is not a problem with the patches at all. Can you please verify? Well, let's explain it better (it was near midnight, yesterday... :-) I'm sorry to contradict *YOU* :-), but it worked fine before applying the patches. What I forgot to mention yesterday (well, it was almost today) is that the two partitions mountd is complaining about are FAT16 partitions, while the partition I was trying to mount is a FAT32 one (BTW the mount itself succeeds, and I can tamper my Windows partition--beautiful!). This is why I thought of a patch-related problem. Today I discovered that mountd yells in the same way as soon as I mount anything (say, /mnt/cdrom) either by hand or via amd: ugo@pegasus:/home/ugo [0]# mount /mnt/cdrom ugo@pegasus:/home/ugo [0]# May 7 18:09:47 pegasus mountd[110]: Can't change attributes for /mnt/limbo. May 7 18:09:47 pegasus mountd[110]: Bad exports list line /mnt/limbo -maproot May 7 18:09:47 pegasus mountd[110]: Can't change attributes for /mnt/xchange_1. May 7 18:09:47 pegasus mountd[110]: Bad exports list line /mnt/xchange_1 -maproot [ ls /amd/cdrom/ leads to the same result (a mounted cdrom and those errors on console) ] Moreover, if I had a bogus entry in /etc/exports, mountd would tell me that during boot, as soon as it is started, but it doesn't: it stays quiet until I mount something else. I'm curious to know what the machine does if I insert /mnt/windows95 in my fstab... please wait, rebooting... [ some time later ] Rebooted fine, no errors. If I mount something now (or ls /amd/cdrom/), I get the same result as before. What I really don't understand is that everything works fine (just as before patching) if I don't mount anything: I can go to another host and NFS-mount those exported FAT16 partition fine. As soon as I mount something here on pegasus, I don't export them anymore. Is there any known problem with NFS exporting + FAT + maproot? BTW, does this happens on -current too? I cannot test that here, as my -current laptop has only one slice on its HD (well, two, but the second is for BIOS Save To Disk feature :-) What can I do to track this down? > - Jordan Bye, UP To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu May 7 14:15:56 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA06432 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 7 May 1998 14:15:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dt050n33.san.rr.com (@dt053nd2.san.rr.com [204.210.34.210]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA06275; Thu, 7 May 1998 14:14:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Studded@san.rr.com) Received: from san.rr.com (Studded@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dt050n33.san.rr.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA01168; Thu, 7 May 1998 14:14:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Studded@san.rr.com) Message-ID: <3552243B.15AAF366@san.rr.com> Date: Thu, 07 May 1998 14:14:35 -0700 From: Studded Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.6-STABLE-0507 i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Craig Wilson CC: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, phk@FreeBSD.ORG, dg@root.com Subject: Re: FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE References: <35502381.7A27@natsoft.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Craig Wilson wrote: > > I am currently using FreeBSD 2.2.2-RELEASE in several commercial sites, > ie running companies accounting and point of sale systems. I have > found FreeBSD 2.2.2 very stable, however would like to use 2.2.6. > I am not in a position to use CVS or to make worlds etc, because > of the number of commercial sites I have, approx 25, some of which > are required to run 24 hours a day, I simply install from CD-ROM, > apply a few patches, and then leave the computer alone. > > Could somebody please tell me whether the fixes to the following problem > reports made it into FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE, and if they did not make > it what the fixes are, and whether the problems are serious and need > fixing. Also are there any other problems that should be fixed with > FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE before putting it into a commercial situation. > > kern/4844 VM lookup, endless loop in vm_map_lookup_lookup_entry() > this PR was closed on Apr26 1998 Poul was the one who closed this with "fixed in -current." He's the one who should be able to tell you if it's fixed in -stable. Given that 2.2.6-Release was cut in march, this PR is certainly not fixed in that release. > kern/6258 VM lookup on kernel map........ > this PR was closed on Apr26 1998 Similar situation with this one, fixed after 2.2.6-Release. It's also closed by poul with "fixed in -current" in spite of the fact that the audit trail has David Greenman asking for the fix to be applied to -Stable. Hope this is helpful to you, Doug -- *** Chief Operations Officer, DALnet IRC network *** *** Proud designer and maintainer of the world's largest Internet *** Relay Chat server with 5,328 simultaneous connections. *** Try spider.dal.net on ports 6662-4 (Powered by FreeBSD) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu May 7 15:16:26 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA16486 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 7 May 1998 15:16:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from msp-ln05.dgii.com (msp-ln05.dgii.com [204.221.110.51]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id PAA16296 for ; Thu, 7 May 1998 15:15:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Robert_Wagner@dgii.com) Received: from Lotus Notes (PU Serial #1839) by msp-ln05.dgii.com (PostalUnion/SMTP(tm) v2.1.9f for Windows NT(tm)) id AA-1998May07.151357.1839.2431657; Thu, 07 May 1998 17:14:57 -0500 From: Robert_Wagner@dgii.com (Robert Wagner) To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <1998May07.151357.1839.2431657@msp-ln05.dgii.com> X-Conversion-ID: X-Mailer: Lotus Notes via PostalUnion/SMTP for Windows NT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Organization: Digi International Date: Thu, 07 May 1998 17:14:57 -0500 Subject: PCI lkm Device Driver Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk I am in the process of creating a PCI lkm Device Driver. I have read all the information on how to write lkm drivers but they all show isa devices. I am working on the load and unload. For loading the lkm, how do I go about rescanning for pci devices on the pci bus. I see that in pci.c there is a rescan function but I do not see how it ties together. Also, the lkm pci device linked list update function is also in pci.c. Does anyone have some guidance for writing the load and unload part of an lkm PCI driver. Thanks, Bob Wagner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu May 7 15:18:58 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA16834 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 7 May 1998 15:18:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from os.dyn.ml.org (unused.wave.shaw.ca [24.64.128.58] (may be forged)) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA16805 for ; Thu, 7 May 1998 15:18:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from vampyro@os.dyn.ml.org) Received: (from vampyro@localhost) by os.dyn.ml.org (8.8.8/8.8.7) id SAA01960 for stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 7 May 1998 18:18:53 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from vampyro) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.2 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8436.894566416@time.cdrom.com> Date: Thu, 07 May 1998 18:18:52 -0400 (EDT) From: iostreamH To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Upgrade comments Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On 07-May-98 Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: >> The UPGRADE.TXT file which came on the CD indicates that I would be >> prompted for a location "into which all files from /etc/ are saved." >> >> I don't recall seeing such a prompt. Previous copies of files >> such as /etc/passwd were simply overwritten. > > What?! Hmmm! That certainly didn't happen during my testing. Are > you sure you chose "upgrade" and didn't simply install on top of the > old system with a novice/express/custom install? :) > >> The file also mentions that the upgrade procedure "replaces the >> previous FreeBSD kernel with a GENERIC kernel." This was not the >> case. My 2.2.5 kernel was left as /kernel and the new 2.2.6 kernel >> was installed as /kernel.GENERIC. > > Hmmmm again. This would be another symptom of not acutally chosing > upgrade since only the upgrade option takes care to chflags the old > bits so that they can be overwritten this way. > > - Jordan I had a similar experiance but I didn't notice the passwd file problem...and yes...it was definatly the upgrade that was chosen. rob. ---------------------------------- E-Mail: iostreamH Date: 07-May-98 Time: 18:13:37 This message was sent by XFMail ---------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu May 7 16:32:42 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA01405 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 7 May 1998 16:32:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from natsoft.com.au (natsoft.com.au [203.39.138.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA01164; Thu, 7 May 1998 16:31:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from craig@natsoft.com.au) Received: from Win95.natsoft.com.au (Win95 [203.39.138.131]) by natsoft.com.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA05483; Fri, 8 May 1998 10:34:01 GMT Message-ID: <35524411.523E@natsoft.com.au> Date: Fri, 08 May 1998 09:30:25 +1000 From: Craig Wilson Organization: National Software Pty Ltd X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04 (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Studded CC: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, phk@FreeBSD.ORG, dg@root.com Subject: Re: FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE References: <35502381.7A27@natsoft.com.au> <3552243B.15AAF366@san.rr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Studded wrote: > > > > > kern/4844 VM lookup, endless loop in vm_map_lookup_lookup_entry() > > this PR was closed on Apr26 1998 > > Poul was the one who closed this with "fixed in -current." He's the one > who should be able to tell you if it's fixed in -stable. Given that > 2.2.6-Release was cut in march, this PR is certainly not fixed in that > release. > > > kern/6258 VM lookup on kernel map........ > > this PR was closed on Apr26 1998 > > Similar situation with this one, fixed after 2.2.6-Release. It's also > closed by poul with "fixed in -current" in spite of the fact that the > audit trail has David Greenman asking for the fix to be applied to > -Stable. > Thankyou for your assistance. Maybe I had better stay with 2.2.2-RELEASE than use 2.2.6 without the above patches. 2.2.2 is working 100% stable for me, so why change? I will look at 2.2.7-RELEASE when it is available. Just something else I would like to note. I installed 2.2.6-RELEASE from CDROM onto a 486/66 Compaq EISA machine with an IDE hard drive and with 8 meg ram. While I was building a custom Kernel on ttyv1 I was using vi on ttyv2. When I exited vi the system froze for approx 20 seconds, except that I could still change from ttyv2 to ttyv1 with ALT F2 etc. ttyv0 had a login message, however I could not login to it, ie no keyboard echo. After the 20 secs the system returned to normal. Has anyone seen this before? Thanks in advance for any information. Regards Craig Wilson National Software Pty Ltd To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu May 7 18:23:58 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA18845 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 7 May 1998 18:23:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (genesi.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.136.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA18754 for ; Thu, 7 May 1998 18:23:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from doconnor@cain.gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id KAA26869; Fri, 8 May 1998 10:44:17 +0930 (CST) Message-Id: <199805080114.KAA26869@cain.gsoft.com.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: Robert_Wagner@dgii.com (Robert Wagner) cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PCI lkm Device Driver In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 07 May 1998 17:14:57 EST." <1998May07.151357.1839.2431657@msp-ln05.dgii.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 08 May 1998 10:44:17 +0930 From: "Daniel O'Connor" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > I am in the process of creating a PCI lkm Device Driver. I have read all the > information on how to write lkm drivers but they all show isa devices. I am > working on the load and unload. For loading the lkm, how do I go about > rescanning for pci devices on the pci bus. I see that in pci.c there is a Well, I wrote one for 2.2.5, and it would load, but unfortunatly you can't unload them :) The reason is that the PCI code doesn't support freeing the IRQ's/mapings etc that you allocate when you attach your device, which is kind of annoying. There was some effort to fix this, but it didn't seem to go far :( --------------------------------------------------------------------- |Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software | |http://www.gsoft.com.au | |The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to| |choose from. -- Andrew Tanenbaum | --------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu May 7 20:02:49 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA03388 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 7 May 1998 20:02:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from roma.coe.ufrj.br (jonny@roma.coe.ufrj.br [146.164.53.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA03270 for ; Thu, 7 May 1998 20:02:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jonny@coe.ufrj.br) Received: (from jonny@localhost) by roma.coe.ufrj.br (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA25151; Fri, 8 May 1998 00:02:12 -0300 (EST) (envelope-from jonny) From: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis Message-Id: <199805080302.AAA25151@roma.coe.ufrj.br> Subject: Problems compiling -stable kernel To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Fri, 8 May 1998 00:02:12 -0300 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Hi, I've just cvsupped the the very lastest -stable sources from cvsup.freebsd.org (to fix the mfs queue problem :) ), but it still does not compile... loading kernel isa.o: Undefined symbol `_isa_devtab_cam' referenced from text segment isa.o: Undefined symbol `_isa_devtab_cam' referenced from text segment isa.o: Undefined symbol `_isa_devtab_cam' referenced from text segment isa.o: Undefined symbol `_isa_devtab_cam' referenced from text segment isa.o: Undefined symbol `_isa_devtab_cam' referenced from text segment isa.o: Undefined symbol `_isa_devtab_cam' referenced from text segment isa.o: Undefined symbol `_isa_devtab_cam' referenced from text segment isa.o: Undefined symbol `_isa_devtab_cam' referenced from text segment *** Error code 1 I'm starting to think that this week's -stable is not to be trusted at all, and will get some older version. What are you guys MFCing this time ? Jonny PS: Latest cvsup insertions: Edit src/sys/ufs/mfs/mfs_vfsops.c Add delta 1.22.2.4 98.05.07.19.04.15 gibbs Edit src/sys/ufs/mfs/mfs_vnops.c Add delta 1.14.2.1 98.05.07.22.47.08 gibbs -- Joao Carlos Mendes Luis jonny@gta.ufrj.br +55 21 290-4698 ( Job ) jonny@coppe.ufrj.br M.Sc. Student Electrical Engineering Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu May 7 20:14:37 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA05807 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 7 May 1998 20:14:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from roma.coe.ufrj.br (jonny@roma.coe.ufrj.br [146.164.53.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA05621 for ; Thu, 7 May 1998 20:14:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jonny@coe.ufrj.br) Received: (from jonny@localhost) by roma.coe.ufrj.br (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA25387; Fri, 8 May 1998 00:13:48 -0300 (EST) (envelope-from jonny) From: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis Message-Id: <199805080313.AAA25387@roma.coe.ufrj.br> Subject: Re: mount_msdos and msdosfs for VFAT/FAT32 access In-Reply-To: from Ugo Paternostro at "May 6, 98 11:59:48 pm" To: paterno@dsi.UNIFI.IT (Ugo Paternostro) Date: Fri, 8 May 1998 00:13:48 -0300 (EST) Cc: hyama@acm.org, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk #define quoting(Ugo Paternostro) // 1) you sys/sys/mount.h file is outdated, as it does not include CodaFS support. // You find a patch attached below. (P.S.: last make world 22nd Apr, sources // supped today at 16:30 UTC) It seems to me that Hideki used 2.2.5 as base for the port. I could not find any other difference than that, though. I also find a problem with some vfs*(3) function. Try doing a mount -p on your system after mounting some VFAT/FAT32 partition. Anybody else see something wrong ? For what I've seen from the code, porting it from -current is not an easy task. I was specially affraid of the simple_lock() et al functions that have simply been nullified. Couldn't them be a source of problem ? What are these for that they do not exist in -stable ? Jonny -- Joao Carlos Mendes Luis jonny@gta.ufrj.br +55 21 290-4698 ( Job ) jonny@coppe.ufrj.br M.Sc. Student Electrical Engineering Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu May 7 21:44:05 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA17832 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 7 May 1998 21:44:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from david.siemens.de (david.siemens.de [192.35.17.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA17746 for ; Thu, 7 May 1998 21:43:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andre.albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de) Received: from salomon.mchp.siemens.de (salomon.siemens.de [139.23.33.13]) by david.siemens.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA17364 for ; Fri, 8 May 1998 06:43:28 +0200 (MDT) X-Envelope-Sender-Is: andre.albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de (at relayer david.siemens.de) Received: from curry.mchp.siemens.de (daemon@curry.mchp.siemens.de [146.180.31.23]) by salomon.mchp.siemens.de (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA10001 for ; Fri, 8 May 1998 06:43:29 +0200 (MDT) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by curry.mchp.siemens.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA20344 for ; Fri, 8 May 1998 06:43:29 +0200 (CEST) From: Andre Albsmeier Message-Id: <199805080443.GAA23262@internal> Subject: problems compiling stable kernel To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Fri, 8 May 1998 06:43:24 +0200 (CEST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk from the newest ctm: root@bali:/sys/compile/BALI>make cc -c -O -pipe -DANDRE -Wreturn-type -Wcomment -Wredundant-decls -Wimplicit -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../../include -DNSWAPDEV=2 -DMFS -DNFS -DFFS -DINET -DCOMPAT_43 -DANDRE -DKERNEL ../../scsi/worm.c ../../scsi/worm.c: In function `wormattach': ../../scsi/worm.c:266: structure has no member named `tqh_first' ./../scsi/worm.c:266: structure has no member named `tqh_last' ../../scsi/worm.c:266: structure has no member named `tqh_first' ../../scsi/worm.c: In function `wormstart': ../../scsi/worm.c:337: structure has no member named `tqh_first' ../../scsi/worm.c:341: structure has no member named `tqh_last' ../../scsi/worm.c: In function `worm_strategy': ../../scsi/worm.c:458: structure has no member named `tqh_last' ../../scsi/worm.c:458: structure has no member named `tqh_last' ../../scsi/worm.c:458: structure has no member named `tqh_last' *** Error code 1 Stop. make world succeded before... -Andre To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu May 7 22:39:06 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA24910 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 7 May 1998 22:39:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from couatl.uchicago.edu (couatl.uchicago.edu [128.135.21.64]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA24873; Thu, 7 May 1998 22:38:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sfarrell@couatl.uchicago.edu) Received: (from sfarrell@localhost) by couatl.uchicago.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA00303; Sat, 9 May 1998 00:37:26 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from sfarrell) To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: gibbs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: -stable kernel compile broken--some cam stuff leaked in! From: sfarrell+lists@farrell.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Date: 09 May 1998 00:37:26 -0500 Message-ID: <87iungm2cp.fsf@couatl.uchicago.edu> Lines: 11 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.3/XEmacs 20.4 - "Emerald" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk isa.c in stable seems to have some cam stuff that leaked into it... of course those symbols don't exist in -stable, so compiling kernel dies with undefined symbol _isa_devtab_cam ...or else i'm very confused ;-) -- Steve Farrell To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu May 7 22:40:37 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA25175 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 7 May 1998 22:40:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from couatl.uchicago.edu (couatl.uchicago.edu [128.135.21.64]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA25169 for ; Thu, 7 May 1998 22:40:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sfarrell@couatl.uchicago.edu) Received: (from sfarrell@localhost) by couatl.uchicago.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA00309; Sat, 9 May 1998 00:39:08 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from sfarrell) To: "Scott A. Kenney" Cc: "'FreeBSD stable'" Subject: Re: swap_pager: out of swap space, only power off did help References: <01BD754F.A0AB9EF0.berend@pobox.com> <19980502004341.14009@rmta.ml.org> From: sfarrell+lists@farrell.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Date: 09 May 1998 00:39:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: "Scott A. Kenney"'s message of "Sat, 2 May 1998 00:43:41 -0400" Message-ID: <87g1ikm29v.fsf@couatl.uchicago.edu> Lines: 13 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.3/XEmacs 20.4 - "Emerald" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk "Scott A. Kenney" writes: > This is a well known problem with procmail on FreeBSD. > The attached message contains a patch for procmail which solves the > problem. If it's a well known problem, then why is'nt this patch part of the port? -- Steve Farrell To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri May 8 02:41:19 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA22051 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 8 May 1998 02:41:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pcOldhamB.Res.carleton.edu (pcOldhamB.Res.Carleton.edu [137.22.96.138]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA22045 for ; Fri, 8 May 1998 02:41:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from root@pcoldhamb.res.carleton.edu) Received: from localhost (root@localhost) by pcOldhamB.Res.carleton.edu (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id EAA01571; Fri, 8 May 1998 04:41:26 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from root@pcoldhamb.res.carleton.edu) Date: Fri, 8 May 1998 04:41:26 -0500 (CDT) From: Ben Oldham To: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Problems compiling -stable kernel In-Reply-To: <199805080302.AAA25151@roma.coe.ufrj.br> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Fri, 8 May 1998, Joao Carlos Mendes Luis wrote: > Hi, > > I've just cvsupped the the very lastest -stable sources from > cvsup.freebsd.org (to fix the mfs queue problem :) ), but it still > does not compile... > > loading kernel > isa.o: Undefined symbol `_isa_devtab_cam' referenced from text segment > a lot of these > isa.o: Undefined symbol `_isa_devtab_cam' referenced from text segment > *** Error code 1 > > > PS: Latest cvsup insertions: > > Edit src/sys/ufs/mfs/mfs_vfsops.c > Add delta 1.22.2.4 98.05.07.19.04.15 gibbs > Edit src/sys/ufs/mfs/mfs_vnops.c > Add delta 1.14.2.1 98.05.07.22.47.08 gibbs > sounds like you've discovered what I ran into this afternoon. If you, like me, use cvsup to update everything, it'll overwrite your msdosfs patches, courtesy of Hideki (you're a wonderful, wonderful person!). You can re-untar the patch tarball, but you're got to remake the mount_msdosfs after you do this. Along the same lines, I'm trying to figure out how to get cvsup to see my refuse file (because I don't want the msdosfs patches to be overwritten each night). Anyone have any ideas? I want to keep cvsupping the rest of the sys directory... hope this helps. Ben Oldham To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri May 8 02:43:09 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA22219 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 8 May 1998 02:43:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from david.siemens.de (david.siemens.de [192.35.17.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA22208 for ; Fri, 8 May 1998 02:43:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andre.albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de) Received: from salomon.mchp.siemens.de (salomon.siemens.de [139.23.33.13]) by david.siemens.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA20586 for ; Fri, 8 May 1998 11:42:43 +0200 (MDT) X-Envelope-Sender-Is: andre.albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de (at relayer david.siemens.de) Received: from curry.mchp.siemens.de (daemon@curry.mchp.siemens.de [146.180.31.23]) by salomon.mchp.siemens.de (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA21677 for ; Fri, 8 May 1998 11:42:43 +0200 (MDT) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by curry.mchp.siemens.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA21768 for ; Fri, 8 May 1998 11:42:43 +0200 (CEST) From: Andre Albsmeier Message-Id: <199805080942.LAA27080@internal> Subject: Re: swap_pager: out of swap space, only power off did help In-Reply-To: <87g1ikm29v.fsf@couatl.uchicago.edu> from "sfarrell+lists@farrell.org" at "May 9, 98 00:39:08 am" To: sfarrell+lists@farrell.org Date: Fri, 8 May 1998 11:42:41 +0200 (CEST) Cc: saken@rmta.ml.org, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > "Scott A. Kenney" writes: > > > This is a well known problem with procmail on FreeBSD. > > The attached message contains a patch for procmail which solves the > > problem. > > If it's a well known problem, then why is'nt this patch part of the > port? I have sent my patch to the maintainer about one week ago but haven't got a reply... -Andre To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri May 8 05:50:19 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA15161 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 8 May 1998 05:50:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from netcom1.netcom.com (mvh@netcom16.netcom.com [192.100.81.129]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA15118 for ; Fri, 8 May 1998 05:50:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mvh@netcom.com) Received: (from mvh@localhost) by netcom1.netcom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA00302; Fri, 8 May 1998 05:49:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mvh) Date: Fri, 8 May 1998 05:49:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199805081249.FAA00302@netcom1.netcom.com> From: "Michael V. Harding" To: jonny@coe.ufrj.br CC: stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: <199805080302.AAA25151@roma.coe.ufrj.br> (message from Joao Carlos Mendes Luis on Fri, 8 May 1998 00:02:12 -0300 (EST)) Subject: Re: Problems compiling -stable kernel References: <199805080302.AAA25151@roma.coe.ufrj.br> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk I had this problem, but I did a 'make world' and the new config which was installed fixed the problem. From: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis Date: Fri, 8 May 1998 00:02:12 -0300 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-UIDL: 66aae3c8ae3aea69a6781120eb96a078 Hi, I've just cvsupped the the very lastest -stable sources from cvsup.freebsd.org (to fix the mfs queue problem :) ), but it still does not compile... loading kernel isa.o: Undefined symbol `_isa_devtab_cam' referenced from text segment isa.o: Undefined symbol `_isa_devtab_cam' referenced from text segment isa.o: Undefined symbol `_isa_devtab_cam' referenced from text segment isa.o: Undefined symbol `_isa_devtab_cam' referenced from text segment isa.o: Undefined symbol `_isa_devtab_cam' referenced from text segment isa.o: Undefined symbol `_isa_devtab_cam' referenced from text segment isa.o: Undefined symbol `_isa_devtab_cam' referenced from text segment isa.o: Undefined symbol `_isa_devtab_cam' referenced from text segment *** Error code 1 I'm starting to think that this week's -stable is not to be trusted at all, and will get some older version. What are you guys MFCing this time ? Jonny PS: Latest cvsup insertions: Edit src/sys/ufs/mfs/mfs_vfsops.c Add delta 1.22.2.4 98.05.07.19.04.15 gibbs Edit src/sys/ufs/mfs/mfs_vnops.c Add delta 1.14.2.1 98.05.07.22.47.08 gibbs -- Joao Carlos Mendes Luis jonny@gta.ufrj.br +55 21 290-4698 ( Job ) jonny@coppe.ufrj.br M.Sc. Student Electrical Engineering Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri May 8 08:11:46 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA05346 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 8 May 1998 08:11:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from austin.polstra.com (austin.polstra.com [206.213.73.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA05322 for ; Fri, 8 May 1998 08:11:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@austin.polstra.com) Received: from austin.polstra.com (jdp@localhost) by austin.polstra.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA26169; Fri, 8 May 1998 08:11:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp) Message-Id: <199805081511.IAA26169@austin.polstra.com> To: root@pcoldhamb.res.carleton.edu Subject: Re: Problems compiling -stable kernel In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Polstra & Co., Seattle, WA Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Fri, 08 May 1998 08:11:26 -0700 From: John Polstra Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk In article , Ben Oldham wrote: > Along the same lines, I'm trying to figure out how to get cvsup to see my > refuse file (because I don't want the msdosfs patches to be overwritten > each night). Anyone have any ideas? man cvsup? ;-) Seriously: what have you tried, and what happened? Please send contents of your supfile and your refuse files, and state the locations of the refuse files. -- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Self-knowledge is always bad news." -- John Barth To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri May 8 08:36:12 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA08708 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 8 May 1998 08:36:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pluto.plutotech.com (mail.plutotech.com [206.168.67.137]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA08553; Fri, 8 May 1998 08:35:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gibbs@plutotech.com) Received: from narnia.plutotech.com (narnia.plutotech.com [206.168.67.130]) by pluto.plutotech.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA08894; Fri, 8 May 1998 09:35:05 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199805081535.JAA08894@pluto.plutotech.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.1 12/23/97 To: sfarrell+lists@farrell.org cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, gibbs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: -stable kernel compile broken--some cam stuff leaked in! In-reply-to: Your message of "09 May 1998 00:37:26 CDT." <87iungm2cp.fsf@couatl.uchicago.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 08 May 1998 09:31:18 -0600 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > >isa.c in stable seems to have some cam stuff that leaked into it... of >course those symbols don't exist in -stable, so compiling kernel dies >with undefined symbol _isa_devtab_cam > >...or else i'm very confused ;-) Recompile config and reconfig your kernel. -- Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri May 8 09:02:21 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA12809 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 8 May 1998 09:02:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from narnia.plutotech.com (narnia.plutotech.com [206.168.67.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA12708 for ; Fri, 8 May 1998 09:01:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gibbs@narnia.plutotech.com) Received: (from gibbs@localhost) by narnia.plutotech.com (8.8.8/8.7.3) id JAA15107; Fri, 8 May 1998 09:57:47 -0600 (MDT) Date: Fri, 8 May 1998 09:57:47 -0600 (MDT) From: "Justin T. Gibbs" Message-Id: <199805081557.JAA15107@narnia.plutotech.com> To: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Problems compiling -stable kernel Newsgroups: pluto.freebsd.stable In-Reply-To: <199805080302.AAA25151@roma.coe.ufrj.br> User-Agent: tin/pre-1.4-971204 (UNIX) (FreeBSD/3.0-CURRENT (i386)) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk In article <199805080302.AAA25151@roma.coe.ufrj.br> you wrote: > > What are you guys MFCing this time ? I merged the following things from current in preparation of a 2.2 CAM snapshot: - Interrupt driven configuration hooks - New buffer queue macros that understand B_ORDERED buffers - CAM and VM software interrupt hooks I also made the DPT driver standard, ripped out the old DPT SWI mechanism (it uses the CAM SWI now), and fixed a few compile warnings in that driver. The buffer queue stuff was the most pervasive change, and I missed a few files. I just fixed worm.c for those of you having problems compiling kernels with the worm device. > Jonny -- Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri May 8 09:39:40 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA18617 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 8 May 1998 09:39:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from xray.csci.unt.edu (xray.csci.unt.edu [129.120.3.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA18572 for ; Fri, 8 May 1998 09:39:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jeffries@silo.csci.unt.edu) Received: from localhost (jeffries@localhost) by xray.csci.unt.edu (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id LAA27789 for ; Fri, 8 May 1998 11:38:57 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jeffries@silo.csci.unt.edu) X-Authentication-Warning: xray.csci.unt.edu: jeffries owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 8 May 1998 11:38:56 -0500 (CDT) From: Jeffrey Lynn Jeffries X-Sender: jeffries@xray.csci.unt.edu To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: MFS queue problems in -stable In-Reply-To: <199805081511.IAA26169@austin.polstra.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk I have seen a brief mention of an mfs queue problem in a previous discussion or two, but can't find any serious discussion in any of the previous -stable messages. Here goes: make world works just fine (sup'ed yesterday around 3 or 4 pm), but the kernel won't compile. I get the error: cc -c -O -Wreturn-type -Wcomment -Wredundant-decls -Wimplicit -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../../include -DMFS -DFAILSAFE -DCOMPAT_43 -DNFS -DFFS -DINET -DKERNEL ../../ufs/mfs/mfs_vfsops.c ../../ufs/mfs/mfs_vfsops.c: In function `mfs_mount': ../../ufs/mfs/mfs_vfsops.c:395: structure has no member named `tqh_first' ../../ufs/mfs/mfs_vfsops.c:395: structure has no member named `tqh_last' ../../ufs/mfs/mfs_vfsops.c:395: structure has no member named `tqh_first' ../../ufs/mfs/mfs_vfsops.c: In function `mfs_start': ../../ufs/mfs/mfs_vfsops.c:470: structure has no member named `tqh_first' ../../ufs/mfs/mfs_vfsops.c:471: structure has no member named `tqh_last' *** Error code 1 Do I need to re-sup, or is there some temporary workaround right now??? ========================================================================== Jeffrey Lynn Jeffries, jeffries@unt.edu http://www.cs.unt.edu/~jeffries Proud user of FreeBSD: Ask me how to unleash the daemon inside your PC To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri May 8 10:33:22 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA28774 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 8 May 1998 10:33:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from xyplex.com (xap.xyplex.com [140.179.130.200]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA28722 for ; Fri, 8 May 1998 10:33:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rwhitesel@xyplex.com) Received: from ltnsvex2.xyplex.com (east.xyplex.com [140.179.176.22]) by xyplex.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA26351 for ; Fri, 8 May 1998 13:13:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pcrlw.xyplex.com by ltnsvex2.xyplex.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.0.1460.8) id GWTJMAAD; Fri, 8 May 1998 13:19:44 -0400 Message-ID: <000101bd7aa4$bfa18220$029cb38c@pcrlw.xyplex.com> From: "Rick Whitesel" To: Date: Fri, 8 May 1998 13:14:23 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.1 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk subscribe freebsd-stable To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri May 8 10:47:36 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA01345 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 8 May 1998 10:47:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gershwin.tera.com (gershwin.tera.com [207.224.230.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA01283 for ; Fri, 8 May 1998 10:47:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tera.tera.com) Received: from athena.tera.com (athena.tera.com [207.224.230.127]) by gershwin.tera.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA21722; Fri, 8 May 1998 10:32:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Gary Kline Received: (from kline@localhost) by athena.tera.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id KAA28883; Fri, 8 May 1998 10:32:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 8 May 1998 10:32:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199805081732.KAA28883@athena.tera.com> To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: gcc quandry Cc: kline@tera.tera.com, kline@thought.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk After several evenings trying to chase down an impossible bug in an X application it finally occured to me to try compiling on my SunOS at work and compare. Bingo! Same code, different logical results. Here, we've got v2.7.2.3.f.1; on tao (still at 2.2-R) it is slightly earlier. At work, my trace was bug-free; at home, not. One solution would be up upgrade to gcc 2.8.X, but the note about this latest rev being buggy have me a bit concerned.... esp'ly since I frequency mod my kernel. Has anybody seen significant bugs with the latest gcc? thanks, gary To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri May 8 11:08:48 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA05117 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 8 May 1998 11:08:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pcOldhamB.Res.carleton.edu (pcOldhamB.Res.Carleton.edu [137.22.96.138]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA05089 for ; Fri, 8 May 1998 11:08:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from root@pcoldhamb.res.carleton.edu) Received: from localhost (root@localhost) by pcOldhamB.Res.carleton.edu (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id NAA00485; Fri, 8 May 1998 13:08:47 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from root@pcoldhamb.res.carleton.edu) Date: Fri, 8 May 1998 13:08:47 -0500 (CDT) From: Ben Oldham To: John Polstra cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Netware In-Reply-To: <199805081511.IAA26169@austin.polstra.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk I'll get back to you on the cvsup-refuse thing (I've checked the man pages, yup) :) in the meantime, has anyone managed to mount a Netware drive over a LAN? Or at least gotten Netware printers to print? Benjamin A. Oldham To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri May 8 12:09:39 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA16602 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 8 May 1998 12:09:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from user1.channel1.com (root@user1.channel1.com [199.1.13.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA16570 for ; Fri, 8 May 1998 12:09:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from admin@channel1.com) Received: from ntadmin (ntadmin.channel1.com [204.96.33.24]) by user1.channel1.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id PAA06826; Fri, 8 May 1998 15:09:16 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.19980508150859.02f28550@pop.channel1.com> X-Sender: deepblue@pop.channel1.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.3 (32) Date: Fri, 08 May 1998 15:08:59 -0400 To: Ben Oldham From: Mail Handler Subject: Re: Netware Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: References: <199805081511.IAA26169@austin.polstra.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk At 01:08 PM 5/8/98 -0500, you wrote: >in the meantime, has anyone managed to mount a Netware drive over a LAN? We are using Novell's NFS Gateway product to export Netware volumes from a 3.11 server to a FreeBSD 2.2.1 server. We have not been able to mount these volumes on a later version of FreeBSD (2.2.2+) so apparently something changed at 2.2.2. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri May 8 13:03:04 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA25461 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 8 May 1998 13:03:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from itchy.afax.com (atlas-224.atlas.com [206.29.170.224]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA25407 for ; Fri, 8 May 1998 13:02:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmk@itchy.afax.com) Received: (from bmk@localhost) by itchy.afax.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA04694; Fri, 8 May 1998 13:01:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmk) Message-Id: <199805082001.NAA04694@itchy.afax.com> Subject: Re: problems compiling stable kernel In-Reply-To: <199805080443.GAA23262@internal> from Andre Albsmeier at "May 8, 98 06:43:24 am" To: andre.albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de (Andre Albsmeier) Date: Fri, 8 May 1998 13:01:18 -0700 (PDT) Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: "bmk" Reply-to: bmk@pobox.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31H (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > from the newest ctm: > > root@bali:/sys/compile/BALI>make > cc -c -O -pipe -DANDRE -Wreturn-type -Wcomment -Wredundant-decls -Wimplicit -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../../include -DNSWAPDEV=2 -DMFS -DNFS -DFFS -DINET -DCOMPAT_43 -DANDRE -DKERNEL ../../scsi/worm.c > .../../scsi/worm.c: In function `wormattach': > .../../scsi/worm.c:266: structure has no member named `tqh_first' > ../../scsi/worm.c:266: structure has no member named `tqh_last' > .../../scsi/worm.c:266: structure has no member named `tqh_first' > .../../scsi/worm.c: In function `wormstart': > .../../scsi/worm.c:337: structure has no member named `tqh_first' > .../../scsi/worm.c:341: structure has no member named `tqh_last' > .../../scsi/worm.c: In function `worm_strategy': > .../../scsi/worm.c:458: structure has no member named `tqh_last' > .../../scsi/worm.c:458: structure has no member named `tqh_last' > .../../scsi/worm.c:458: structure has no member named `tqh_last' > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. I'm having a very similar problem, except that it manifests itself in the MFS code. (CVSup as of 20 or so hours ago. I'm going to sup the updates and see if it's fixed there. I've temporarily disabled MFS to work around the problem. -- Brant Katkansky IDPA A01830 Software Engineer, ADC To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri May 8 13:11:12 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA26784 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 8 May 1998 13:11:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from david.siemens.de (david.siemens.de [192.35.17.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA26726 for ; Fri, 8 May 1998 13:10:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andre.albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de) Received: from salomon.mchp.siemens.de (salomon.siemens.de [139.23.33.13]) by david.siemens.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA05158 for ; Fri, 8 May 1998 22:10:11 +0200 (MDT) X-Envelope-Sender-Is: andre.albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de (at relayer david.siemens.de) Received: from curry.mchp.siemens.de (daemon@curry.mchp.siemens.de [146.180.31.23]) by salomon.mchp.siemens.de (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA03704 for ; Fri, 8 May 1998 22:10:12 +0200 (MDT) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by curry.mchp.siemens.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA26140 for ; Fri, 8 May 1998 22:10:12 +0200 (CEST) From: Andre Albsmeier Message-Id: <199805082010.WAA10729@internal> Subject: Re: problems compiling stable kernel In-Reply-To: <199805082001.NAA04694@itchy.afax.com> from bmk at "May 8, 98 01:01:18 pm" To: bmk@pobox.com Date: Fri, 8 May 1998 22:10:09 +0200 (CEST) Cc: andre.albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de, stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > > from the newest ctm: > > > > root@bali:/sys/compile/BALI>make > > cc -c -O -pipe -DANDRE -Wreturn-type -Wcomment -Wredundant-decls -Wimplicit -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../../include -DNSWAPDEV=2 -DMFS -DNFS -DFFS -DINET -DCOMPAT_43 -DANDRE -DKERNEL ../../scsi/worm.c > > .../../scsi/worm.c: In function `wormattach': > > .../../scsi/worm.c:266: structure has no member named `tqh_first' > > ../../scsi/worm.c:266: structure has no member named `tqh_last' > > .../../scsi/worm.c:266: structure has no member named `tqh_first' > > .../../scsi/worm.c: In function `wormstart': > > .../../scsi/worm.c:337: structure has no member named `tqh_first' > > .../../scsi/worm.c:341: structure has no member named `tqh_last' > > .../../scsi/worm.c: In function `worm_strategy': > > .../../scsi/worm.c:458: structure has no member named `tqh_last' > > .../../scsi/worm.c:458: structure has no member named `tqh_last' > > .../../scsi/worm.c:458: structure has no member named `tqh_last' > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop. > > I'm having a very similar problem, except that it manifests itself in > the MFS code. (CVSup as of 20 or so hours ago. I'm going to sup the > updates and see if it's fixed there. > > I've temporarily disabled MFS to work around the problem. I think the MFS and the worm.c have been fixed now as I have been told. The ctm with the MFS changes already arrived here... -Andre To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri May 8 13:43:43 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA04485 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 8 May 1998 13:43:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from cesit1.unifi.it (cesit1.unifi.it [150.217.1.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA04367 for ; Fri, 8 May 1998 13:43:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ugo@dsi.UNIFI.IT) Received: from aguirre.dsi.unifi.it by CESIT1.UNIFI.IT (PMDF V5.1-10 #23168) with SMTP id <01IWSDRHLHTO0000O8@CESIT1.UNIFI.IT> for stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Fri, 8 May 1998 10:47:25 MET Received: from dsi.unifi.it (com4.unifi.it) by aguirre.dsi.unifi.it (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA22453; Wed, 06 May 1998 19:31:18 +0200 Received: from pegasus.home.net (pegasus.home.net [192.168.1.3]) by dsi.unifi.it (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA28290 for ; Fri, 08 May 1998 22:19:51 +0200 (MET DST envelope-from ugo) Received: (from ugo@localhost) by pegasus.home.net (8.8.8/8.8.7) id WAA01555 for stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Fri, 08 May 1998 22:19:51 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Fri, 08 May 1998 22:19:51 +0200 (MET DST) From: Ugo Paternostro Subject: RE: problems compiling stable kernel In-reply-to: <199805080443.GAA23262@internal> To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Message-id: Organization: Not an organization MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XFMail 1.2 [p0] on FreeBSD Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On 08-May-98 Andre Albsmeier wrote about "problems compiling stable kernel": > ../../scsi/worm.c:266: structure has no member named `tqh_first' Yep, me too: cvsupped 7th May 1998 13:43 UTC. Re-cvsupping right now. Should I rollback to Tuesday sources? I suspect Justin commits on Wednesday... O:-) > -Andre Bye, UP To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri May 8 13:45:04 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA04743 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 8 May 1998 13:45:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from cesit1.unifi.it (cesit1.unifi.it [150.217.1.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA04643 for ; Fri, 8 May 1998 13:44:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ugo@dsi.UNIFI.IT) Received: from aguirre.dsi.unifi.it by CESIT1.UNIFI.IT (PMDF V5.1-10 #23168) with SMTP id <01IWSDT5HYWY0000O8@CESIT1.UNIFI.IT> for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Fri, 8 May 1998 10:48:45 MET Received: from dsi.unifi.it (com4.unifi.it) by aguirre.dsi.unifi.it (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA22460; Wed, 06 May 1998 19:32:55 +0200 Received: from pegasus.home.net (pegasus.home.net [192.168.1.3]) by dsi.unifi.it (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA28261; Fri, 08 May 1998 21:45:45 +0200 (MET DST envelope-from ugo) Received: (from ugo@localhost) by pegasus.home.net (8.8.8/8.8.7) id VAA01477; Fri, 08 May 1998 21:45:54 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Fri, 08 May 1998 21:45:54 +0200 (MET DST) From: Ugo Paternostro Subject: Re: mount_msdos and msdosfs for VFAT/FAT32 access In-reply-to: <199805080313.AAA25387@roma.coe.ufrj.br> To: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, hyama@acm.org Message-id: Organization: Not an organization MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XFMail 1.2 [p0] on FreeBSD Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On 08-May-98 Joao Carlos Mendes Luis wrote about "Re: mount_msdos and msdosfs for VFAT/FAT32 access": > I also find a problem with some vfs*(3) function. Try doing a mount -p > on your system after mounting some VFAT/FAT32 partition. Anybody else > see something wrong ? Do you mean those "none"? ugo@pegasus:~ [0]> mount -p [...omissis...] /dev/wd0s1 /mnt/dos none rw 0 0 ^^^^^^ /dev/wd0s2 /mnt/windows95 none rw 0 0 ^^^^^^ /dev/wd0s5 /mnt/limbo none rw 0 0 ^^^^^^ /dev/wd2s1 /mnt/xchange_1 none rw 0 0 ^^^^^^ [...omissis...] > Jonny Bye, UP To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri May 8 14:52:33 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA21646 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 8 May 1998 14:52:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pop.uniserve.com (pop.uniserve.com [204.244.156.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA21449 for ; Fri, 8 May 1998 14:51:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tom@uniserve.com) Received: from shell.uniserve.ca [204.244.186.218] by pop.uniserve.com with smtp (Exim 1.82 #4) id 0yXv32-0001vq-00; Fri, 8 May 1998 14:51:20 -0700 Date: Fri, 8 May 1998 14:51:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom X-Sender: tom@shell.uniserve.ca To: Mail Handler cc: Ben Oldham , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Netware In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.19980508150859.02f28550@pop.channel1.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Fri, 8 May 1998, Mail Handler wrote: > At 01:08 PM 5/8/98 -0500, you wrote: > >in the meantime, has anyone managed to mount a Netware drive over a LAN? > > We are using Novell's NFS Gateway product to export Netware volumes > from a 3.11 server to a FreeBSD 2.2.1 server. We have not been able > to mount these volumes on a later version of FreeBSD (2.2.2+) so > apparently something changed at 2.2.2. Maybe the NFSv3 requests confuse the Netware gateway. Try adding a "-2" to your mount_nfs command line. Also, netcon makes a Netware client for FreeBSD. Tom Systems Support Uniserve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat May 9 04:27:27 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA05408 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sat, 9 May 1998 04:27:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from cesit1.unifi.it (cesit1.unifi.it [150.217.1.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA05389 for ; Sat, 9 May 1998 04:27:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ugo@dsi.UNIFI.IT) Received: from aguirre.dsi.unifi.it by CESIT1.UNIFI.IT (PMDF V5.1-10 #23168) with SMTP id <01IWT8NS8IMS00010S@CESIT1.UNIFI.IT> for stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Sat, 9 May 1998 01:31:40 MET Received: from dsi.unifi.it (bologna.fol.it) by aguirre.dsi.unifi.it (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA24699; Thu, 07 May 1998 10:16:09 +0200 Received: from pegasus.home.net (pegasus.home.net [192.168.1.3]) by dsi.unifi.it (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA28768 for ; Fri, 08 May 1998 23:06:00 +0200 (MET DST envelope-from ugo) Received: (from ugo@localhost) by pegasus.home.net (8.8.8/8.8.7) id XAA05320 for stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Fri, 08 May 1998 23:06:00 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Fri, 08 May 1998 23:06:00 +0200 (MET DST) From: Ugo Paternostro Subject: RE: problems compiling stable kernel In-reply-to: To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Message-id: Organization: Not an organization MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XFMail 1.2 [p0] on FreeBSD Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On 08-May-98 Ugo Paternostro wrote about "RE: problems compiling stable kernel": >> ../../scsi/worm.c:266: structure has no member named `tqh_first' > > Yep, me too: cvsupped 7th May 1998 13:43 UTC. Re-cvsupping right now. Should To follow up to myself: cvsupping again (20:44 UTC) and recompiling config fixed it. Many thanks to Justin! Bye, UP To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat May 9 08:37:05 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA23587 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sat, 9 May 1998 08:37:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from softweyr.com ([204.68.178.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA23582 for ; Sat, 9 May 1998 08:37:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from softweyr.com (localhost.softweyr.com [127.0.0.1]) by softweyr.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA07838; Sat, 9 May 1998 09:36:46 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Message-ID: <3554780D.2B8E746E@softweyr.com> Date: Sat, 09 May 1998 09:36:45 -0600 From: Wes Peters Organization: Softweyr llc X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gary Kline CC: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, kline@thought.org Subject: Re: gcc quandry References: <199805081732.KAA28883@athena.tera.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Gary Kline wrote: > One solution would be up upgrade to gcc 2.8.X, but > the note about this latest rev being buggy have > me a bit concerned.... esp'ly since I frequency > mod my kernel. > > Has anybody seen significant bugs with the latest > gcc? No, but there are some caveats. The exception code in 2.8.1 still isn't world-class, though it is better than 2.7.x by a long shot. Also, you didn't mention if you tried to compile the code without optimization, etc. Since you can install gcc-2.8.x in /usr/local and not conflict with the standard compiler or any other installation, you have little to lose (other than a few megs of disk space) in trying the newer compiler. You may want to try 'egcs' as well, although it looks like the 1.1.x releases are going to be much better on FreeBSD. -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC http://www.softweyr.com/~softweyr wes@softweyr.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat May 9 12:55:15 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA19646 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sat, 9 May 1998 12:55:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gershwin.tera.com (gershwin.tera.com [207.224.230.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA19606 for ; Sat, 9 May 1998 12:54:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tera.tera.com) Received: from athena.tera.com (athena.tera.com [207.224.230.127]) by gershwin.tera.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA08112; Sat, 9 May 1998 12:54:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Gary Kline Received: (from kline@localhost) by athena.tera.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA01748; Sat, 9 May 1998 12:54:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199805091954.MAA01748@athena.tera.com> Subject: Re: gcc quandry In-Reply-To: <3554780D.2B8E746E@softweyr.com> from Wes Peters at "May 9, 98 09:36:45 am" To: wes@softweyr.com (Wes Peters) Date: Sat, 9 May 1998 12:54:13 -0700 (PDT) Cc: kline@tera.tera.com, stable@FreeBSD.ORG, kline@thought.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL23 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk According to Wes Peters: > Gary Kline wrote: > > One solution would be up upgrade to gcc 2.8.X, but > > the note about this latest rev being buggy have > > me a bit concerned.... esp'ly since I frequency > > mod my kernel. > > > > Has anybody seen significant bugs with the latest > > gcc? > > No, but there are some caveats. The exception code in 2.8.1 still isn't > world-class, though it is better than 2.7.x by a long shot. Also, you > didn't mention if you tried to compile the code without optimization, > etc. Hm. In fact I did both optimized and non-opt'd on my P90. -g and non -g. Because the code isn't exactly the same on the Sun (no SoundBlaster on the Sparc) I can't be 100%; only about 97%. > > Since you can install gcc-2.8.x in /usr/local and not conflict with the > standard compiler or any other installation, you have little to lose > (other than a few megs of disk space) in trying the newer compiler. I was wondering about this. It's been a couple years since I ported//installed gcc by hand so I am wondering what dependencies there are. If I install gcc-2.8.1 in /usr/local, will there be conflicts with the gcc headers? I suppose if I run into hassles I can restore this from tape; but better to ask beforre jumping :-) > You may want to try 'egcs' as well, although it looks like the 1.1.x > releases are going to be much better on FreeBSD. > I'm looking forward to checking out all the new tools ... thanks for your help, gary To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat May 9 13:04:03 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA21156 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sat, 9 May 1998 13:04:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from softweyr.com ([204.68.178.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA21104 for ; Sat, 9 May 1998 13:03:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from softweyr.com (localhost.softweyr.com [127.0.0.1]) by softweyr.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA08258; Sat, 9 May 1998 14:03:41 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Message-ID: <3554B69C.69608BCB@softweyr.com> Date: Sat, 09 May 1998 14:03:40 -0600 From: Wes Peters Organization: Softweyr llc X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gary Kline CC: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, kline@thought.org Subject: Re: gcc quandry References: <199805091954.MAA01748@athena.tera.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk According to Wes Peters: % Since you can install gcc-2.8.x in /usr/local and not conflict with the % standard compiler or any other installation, you have little to lose % (other than a few megs of disk space) in trying the newer compiler. Gary Kline wrote: > I was wondering about this. It's been a couple years since > I ported//installed gcc by hand so I am wondering what > dependencies there are. If I install gcc-2.8.1 in /usr/local, > will there be conflicts with the gcc headers? I suppose if > I run into hassles I can restore this from tape; but better > to ask beforre jumping :-) No problem. Modern versions of GCC install themselves 'atomically', except for the inevitable collisions in /usr/local/bin/gcc, g++, etc. You can get around that problem by setting the GCC_EXEC_PREFIX to point to the settings for any of the GCC compilers you have installed. Any header files the compiler installation has to 'correct' are placed in a per-version directory, so it will not clobber and older (or newer) installation. If you want to try gcc-2.8.1 the quick way, there is a binary package available. Go to a root shell and enter: pkg_add ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/packages-2.2.6/lang/gcc-2.8.1.tgz and you should have it installed. Couldn't be simpler, now could it? -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC http://www.softweyr.com/~softweyr wes@softweyr.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat May 9 13:06:24 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA21641 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sat, 9 May 1998 13:06:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (gdi.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA21615 for ; Sat, 9 May 1998 13:06:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.8.7/8.8.8) with SMTP id NAA03221 for ; Sat, 9 May 1998 13:06:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu) X-Received: from avrasya.ispro.net.tr (avrasya.ispro.net.tr [195.174.18.1]) by resnet.uoregon.edu (8.8.5/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA06387 for ; Fri, 8 May 1998 21:25:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yurtesen@ispro.net.tr) X-Received: from localhost (yurtesen@localhost) by avrasya.ispro.net.tr (8.8.6/8.7.3) with SMTP id IAA20183; Sat, 9 May 1998 08:21:47 +0300 Date: Sat, 9 May 1998 08:21:46 +0300 (EET DST) From: Evren Yurtesen To: Doug White cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kernel! In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Well, I was using 2.2.5 but last time I used cvsup on a machine and compiled the kernel after that when I issue uname -a command it was saying 2.2.6-STABLE this time I used cvsup and then compiled the kernel again , as I did before on another machine but it does not want to compile... I still could not understand what is wrong... also I thought after using cvsup I should use make world command to rebuild my system and upgrade I also could not understand why the other machine says 2.2.6-stable,but I know that it is what it says because after I compile I had some problems with fstab and that is a problem occurs when someone updates to 2.2.6 (I guess so) and about the wcd well I guess I read it from handbook pages... and put it into kernel but even I comment out that line the kernel does not want to compile anyway.. thank you Evren Yurtesen ISPRO A.S. On Fri, 8 May 1998, Doug White wrote: > On Fri, 8 May 1998, Evren Yurtesen wrote: > > > well when I try to compile my kernel it gives this message... > > What version of FreeBSD are you trying to compile? > > wcd0 is not a controller, it's a device. > > > loading kernel > > isa.o: Undefined symbol `_isa_devtab_cam' referenced from text segment > > isa.o: Undefined symbol `_isa_devtab_cam' referenced from text segment > > isa.o: Undefined symbol `_isa_devtab_cam' referenced from text segment > > isa.o: Undefined symbol `_isa_devtab_cam' referenced from text segment > > isa.o: Undefined symbol `_isa_devtab_cam' referenced from text segment > > isa.o: Undefined symbol `_isa_devtab_cam' referenced from text segment > > isa.o: Undefined symbol `_isa_devtab_cam' referenced from text segment > > isa.o: Undefined symbol `_isa_devtab_cam' referenced from text segment > > Doug White | University of Oregon > Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant > http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat May 9 22:21:48 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA15822 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sat, 9 May 1998 22:21:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.webspan.net (root@mail.webspan.net [206.154.70.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA15817 for ; Sat, 9 May 1998 22:21:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from opsys@mail.webspan.net) Received: from orion.webspan.net (orion.webspan.net [206.154.70.5]) by mail.webspan.net (WEBSPAN/970608) with SMTP id BAA21414 for ; Sun, 10 May 1998 01:15:58 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 01:21:00 -0400 (EDT) From: Open Systems Networking X-Sender: opsys@orion.webspan.net To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: isa.o: Undefined symbol `_isa_devtab_cam' referenced from text segment Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk I am trying to upgrade the kernel from a 2.2.5 box to a 2.2.6 kernel and I get this: loading kernel isa.o: Undefined symbol `_isa_devtab_cam' referenced from text segment Do I need to make world with 2.2.6 sources to upgrade the kernel? I didnt think I needed to. Chris -- "I don't do favors, I accumulate debts" ===================================| Open Systems Networking And Consulting. FreeBSD 2.2.6 is available now! | Phone: 316-326-6800 -----------------------------------| 1402 N. Washington, Wellington, KS-67152 FreeBSD: The power to serve! | E-Mail: opsys@open-systems.net http://www.freebsd.org | Consulting-Network Engineering-Security ===================================| http://open-systems.net -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: 2.6.2 mQENAzPemUsAAAEH/06iF0BU8pMtdLJrxp/lLk3vg9QJCHajsd25gYtR8X1Px1Te gWU0C4EwMh4seDIgK9bzFmjjlZOEgS9zEgia28xDgeluQjuuMyUFJ58MzRlC2ONC foYIZsFyIqdjEOCBdfhH5bmgB5/+L5bjDK6lNdqD8OAhtC4Xnc1UxAKq3oUgVD/Z d5UJXU2xm+f08WwGZIUcbGcaonRC/6Z/5o8YpLVBpcFeLtKW5WwGhEMxl9WDZ3Kb NZH6bx15WiB2Q/gZQib3ZXhe1xEgRP+p6BnvF364I/To9kMduHpJKU97PH3dU7Mv CXk2NG3rtOgLTEwLyvtBPqLnbx35E0JnZc0k5YkABRO0JU9wZW4gU3lzdGVtcyA8 b3BzeXNAb3Blbi1zeXN0ZW1zLm5ldD4= =BBjp -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat May 9 22:25:10 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA16013 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sat, 9 May 1998 22:25:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from white.carrot.kansai.oki.co.jp (okigate.oki.co.jp [202.226.91.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA16002 for ; Sat, 9 May 1998 22:25:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hyama@acm.org) Received: from acm.org (pudding.carrot.kansai.oki.co.jp [10.173.3.47]) by white.carrot.kansai.oki.co.jp (8.8.7/3.5Wpl7) with ESMTP id OAA09090; Sun, 10 May 1998 14:24:49 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <35553A17.D283046C@acm.org> Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 14:24:39 +0900 From: Hideki Yamamoto X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.03 [en] (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ugo Paternostro CC: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: mount_msdos and msdosfs for VFAT/FAT32 access References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Hi, Ugo Paternostro wrote: > On 08-May-98 Joao Carlos Mendes Luis wrote about "Re: mount_msdos and msdosfs > for VFAT/FAT32 access": > > I also find a problem with some vfs*(3) function. Try doing a mount -p > > on your system after mounting some VFAT/FAT32 partition. Anybody else > > see something wrong ? > > Do you mean those "none"? > > ugo@pegasus:~ [0]> mount -p > [...omissis...] > /dev/wd0s1 /mnt/dos none rw 0 0 > ^^^^^^ > /dev/wd0s2 /mnt/windows95 none rw 0 0 > ^^^^^^ > /dev/wd0s5 /mnt/limbo none rw 0 0 > ^^^^^^ > /dev/wd2s1 /mnt/xchange_1 none rw 0 0 > ^^^^^^ > [...omissis...] Thank you for your testing.I also saw the two problems as Jonny said: (1) mount -p prints "none" type without any error message. (2) the mounted MSDOS file systems cannot sometimes unmounted. I have two VFAT partitions on one IDE drive. One can be unmounted correctly with 'umount /dos', but the other cannot be unmounted with "Device busy" message after 'umount /dos-d.' When typing 'umount /dos-d' before 'umount /dos', the result is the same as the above. /dos-d cannot be unmounted with "Device busy." I call it "un-unmount problem." I have not seen the un-unmount problem on a floppy device.:-) Do -stable users see the same problems, especially on removable medias? Don't -current users see the same problems? Thanks, Hideki Yamamoto (hyama@acm.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message