From owner-freebsd-atm Tue Sep 14 22:31:41 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Received: from etri.re.kr (mail.etri.re.kr [129.254.113.113]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B89AA15703 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 1999 22:31:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from krkang@etri.re.kr) Received: from krkang (krkang.etri.re.kr [129.254.191.201]) by etri.re.kr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA15313; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 14:29:20 +0900 (KST) Message-ID: <001f01beff3b$741f1520$c9bffe81@etri.re.kr> Reply-To: "Kyungran Kang" From: "Kyungran Kang" To: Cc: Subject: CRC errors of en0 at receiver side Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 14:30:40 +0900 Organization: ETRI MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ks_c_5601-1987" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: owner-freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org SGVsbG8uDQoNCkknbSBjb25maWd1cmluZ25nIGEgc3lzdGVtIGZvciBJUCBvdmVyIEFUTSB3aXRo IEZyZWVCU0QgMy4xLg0KSSB0cmllZCBib3RoIEJTREFUTSBhbmQgSEFSUCB3aXRoIEVmZmljaWVu dCBOZXR3b3JrIEluYy4gQVRNIE5JQy4NCg0KSSBmb3VuZCB0aGF0IGhlYTAoRU5JIEFUTSBOSUMg aW4gSEFSUCkgd29ya3Mgd2VsbCB3aXRoIEZvcmUgQVRNIFN3aXRjaCAyMDBCWA0KYnV0IGVuMCAo RU5JIEFUTSBOSUMgaW4gQlNEQVRNKSByZXN1bHRzIGluIHNldmVyZSBDUkMgZXJyb3JzIGF0IHRo ZSByZWNlaXZlciBzaWRlIGlmDQp0d28gRU5JIEFUTSBOSUNzIGFyZSBjb25uZWN0ZWQgYnkgdGhl IEFUTSBzd2l0Y2guDQpUaGUgcmVzdWx0aW5nIHBlcmZvcm1hbmNlIHNob3duIGJ5IG5ldHBlcmYg aXMgNTAwa2JwcyB3aGlsZSB3ZSBnZXQgODBNYnBzDQp3aXRoIGhlYTAuDQoNClRoZXJlIGFyZSBu byBDUkMgZXJyb3JzIGlmIHRoZSB0d28gRU5JIEFUTSBOSUNzIGFyZSBjb25uZWN0ZWQgZGlyZWN0 bHkNCndpdGhvdXQgYW55IEFUTSBzd2l0Y2ggYmV0d2VlbiB0aGVtLiANCg0KUGxlYXNlIGNhbiB5 b3UgaGVscCBtZSBmaWd1cmUgb3V0IHdoYXQgaXMgd3Jvbmc/DQpIYXZlIHlvdSBtZXQgc3VjaCBw cm9ibGVtIGFuZCBkaWQgeW91IHNvbHZlIGl0Pw0KDQpUaGFua3MgdmVyeSBtdWNoIGZvciB5b3Vy IGhlbHAgaW4gYWR2YW5jZS4NCg0KU2luY2VyZWx5LA0KDQpLeXVuZ3JhbiBLYW5nDQoNCg0K To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-atm Wed Sep 15 12:33: 1 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Received: from thelab.hub.org (nat203.199.mpoweredpc.net [142.177.203.199]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 339A21512F for ; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 12:32:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (scrappy@localhost) by thelab.hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA28194 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 16:32:46 -0300 (ADT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) X-Authentication-Warning: thelab.hub.org: scrappy owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 16:32:46 -0300 (ADT) From: The Hermit Hacker To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org subscribe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-atm Thu Sep 16 1:29:14 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Received: from uni-sb.de (uni-sb.de [134.96.252.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87F4D1544F for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 01:29:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mreckt@wjpserver.CS.Uni-SB.DE) Received: from cs.uni-sb.de (cs.uni-sb.de [134.96.252.31]) by uni-sb.de (8.9.3/1999070600) with ESMTP id KAA22619 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 10:28:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wjpserver.cs.uni-sb.de (wjpserver.cs.uni-sb.de [134.96.247.42]) by cs.uni-sb.de (8.9.3/1999031900) with ESMTP id KAA17392 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 10:28:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from vodix.cs.uni-sb.de (vodix [134.96.247.43]) by wjpserver.cs.uni-sb.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/wjp-SVR4/1999052600) with ESMTP id KAA16731 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 10:28:53 +0200 (MET DST) Received: by vodix.cs.uni-sb.de; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 10:28:53 +0200 (MET DST) To: Subject: Re: CRC errors of en0 at receiver side References: <001f01beff3b$741f1520$c9bffe81@etri.re.kr> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Martin Recktenwald Date: 16 Sep 1999 10:28:52 +0200 In-Reply-To: "Kyungran Kang"'s message of "Wed, 15 Sep 1999 14:30:40 +0900" Message-ID: Lines: 14 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.45/XEmacs 21.1 - "20 Minutes to Nikko" Sender: owner-freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org "Kyungran Kang" writes: > I'm configuringng a system for IP over ATM with FreeBSD 3.1. > I tried both BSDATM and HARP with Efficient Network Inc. ATM NIC. > > I found that hea0(ENI ATM NIC in HARP) works well with Fore ATM Switch 200BX > but en0 (ENI ATM NIC in BSDATM) results in severe CRC errors at the receiver side if > two ENI ATM NICs are connected by the ATM switch. The same configuration with both FreeBSD 3.0 and 3.2 works perfectly for me, no CRC errors. I never tried FreeBSD 3.1, but AFAIK the en0 driver did not change. Martin. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-atm Thu Sep 16 2:18:27 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Received: from inetfw.sonycsl.co.jp (inetfw.SonyCSL.Co.Jp [203.137.129.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C5A150AD for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 02:18:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kjc@csl.sony.co.jp) Received: from hotaka.csl.sony.co.jp (root@hotaka.csl.sony.co.jp [43.27.98.57]) by inetfw.sonycsl.co.jp (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7Ws3/99071615) with ESMTP id SAA08798 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 18:18:23 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (kjc@[127.0.0.1]) by hotaka.csl.sony.co.jp (8.8.8/3.7Ws3/hotaka/99071615) with ESMTP id SAA26315 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 18:18:22 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <199909160918.SAA26315@hotaka.csl.sony.co.jp> To: atm@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CRC errors of en0 at receiver side In-reply-to: Your message of "16 Sep 1999 10:28:52 +0200." Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 18:18:21 +0900 From: Kenjiro Cho Sender: owner-freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Martin Recktenwald said: > "Kyungran Kang" writes: > I'm configuringng a system for IP over ATM with FreeBSD 3.1. > I tried both BSDATM and HARP with Efficient Network Inc. ATM NIC. > > I found that hea0(ENI ATM NIC in HARP) works well with Fore ATM Switch 200BX > but en0 (ENI ATM NIC in BSDATM) results in severe CRC errors at the receiver side if > two ENI ATM NICs are connected by the ATM switch. >> The same configuration with both FreeBSD 3.0 and 3.2 works perfectly >> for me, no CRC errors. I never tried FreeBSD 3.1, but AFAIK the en0 >> driver did not change. CRC errors indicate cell loss at an intermediate ATM switch. If only en0 has CRC errors with the same configuration, it could be that en0 sends cells faster than hea0. (last time I looked, the en driver uses larger DMA bursts.) -Kenjiro To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-atm Thu Sep 16 10:48: 9 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Received: from btm4r4.alcatel.be (btm4r4.alcatel.be [195.207.101.110]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA85214E6A for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 10:48:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from livensw@rc.bel.alcatel.be) Received: from btmq9s.rc.bel.alcatel.be (btmq9s.rc.bel.alcatel.be [138.203.65.182]) by btm4r4.alcatel.be (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA09131 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 19:48:04 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from btmq9z.rc.bel.alcatel.be (btmq9z [138.203.65.192]) by btmq9s.rc.bel.alcatel.be (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA17084 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 19:48:30 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from livensw@localhost) by btmq9z.rc.bel.alcatel.be (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) id TAA16275 for freebsd-atm@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 19:47:57 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 19:47:57 +0200 From: Wim Livens To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Subject: testing lanai 25Mbps driver: doesn't work Message-ID: <19990916194757.A10019@rc.bel.alcatel.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I'm trying to get the Efficient speedstream 3010 card to work (ef driver) I have a setup of 2 PCs with with each one such card and a crossed cable (the cable works, because it works under Windoze) The card is detected as: ef0: irq 11 at device 14.0 on pci0 ef_attach: seeprom=\M^A MAC=00:20:ea:02:73:f2 I do: foo# ifconfig ef0 inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.252 up foo# route add -iface 10.0.0.2 -link ef0:0.0.0.c and bar# ifconfig ef0 inet 10.0.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.252 up bar# route add -iface 10.0.0.1 -link ef0:0.0.0.c Now, a ping doesn't work. The counters given by 'netstat -I ef0' show only output packets; no input packets nor errors. Anyone has a hint where to look further ? (I'm currently not following this list) Thanks a lot, -- Wim Livens. Alcatel - Corporate Research Center wim.livens@alcatel.be Fr. Wellesplein 1 livensw@rc.bel.alcatel.be B-2018 Antwerpen Tel: +32 3 240 7570 Belgium. Fax: +32 3 240 9932 PS: I hope to get this to work by tomorrow, so the people can show FreeBSD/Brooktree/vic/vat for their fancy videoconferencing demo instead of Microsoft Netmeeting :-( To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-atm Fri Sep 17 6:33:25 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Received: from thelab.hub.org (nat203.199.mpoweredpc.net [142.177.203.199]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 338BC14CEF for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 06:33:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (scrappy@localhost) by thelab.hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA48279 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 10:33:39 -0300 (ADT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) X-Authentication-Warning: thelab.hub.org: scrappy owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 10:33:39 -0300 (ADT) From: The Hermit Hacker To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Subject: ATM support ... best card, and how good? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Just building our first FreeBSD at work (I've been using it myself for >5 years now) to start encroaching on the Solaris domain, and have been told I require ATM... I've seen in LINT that we do have ATM support, just wondering how good it is (reliable, or still problematic?), what is the best card I can buy (I saw the Adaptec XX is supported?), and is it only 4.0-CURRENT, or does 3.x support it well as well? Thanks... Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-atm Fri Sep 17 9:17:58 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Received: from mel.alcatel.fr (mel.alcatel.fr [212.208.74.132]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF82215887 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 09:17:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from thierry.herbelot@alcatel.fr) Received: from aifhs2.alcatel.fr (mailhub.alcatel.fr [155.132.180.80]) by mel.alcatel.fr (ALCANET/SMTP) with ESMTP id RAA28757; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 17:12:03 +0200 Received: from lune.telspace.alcatel.fr (lune.telspace.alcatel.fr [155.132.144.65]) by aifhs2.alcatel.fr (ALCANET/SMTP2) with ESMTP id SAA05012; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 18:09:45 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from telss1 (telss1.telspace.alcatel.fr [155.132.51.4]) by lune.telspace.alcatel.fr (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA12336; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 17:57:11 +0200 (MEST) Received: from alcatel.fr by telss1 (8.8.8+Sun/SMI-SVR4) id SAA08297; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 18:09:18 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <37E26728.5AAA2F45@alcatel.fr> Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 18:07:04 +0200 From: Thierry Herbelot Reply-To: thierry.herbelot@alcatel.fr Organization: ALCATEL CIT Nanterre X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG, harp@magic.net Subject: [OT, long] Xylan switch, Fore PCA-200, NT and bridged RFC1483 References: <199909102016.PAA15877@plains.NoDak.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello, As said in the subject, the question is (more than slightly) off-topic, but the setup I have won't work with anything other than NT, I fear. I'm trying to connect two PCs : - one has an Ethernet interface and is connected to an Ethernet module of a Xylan switch (1100-LSS). - the other has a ATM interface (Fore PCA-200e) and its driver is configured as RFC-1483 in bridged mode. The fore adapter is also connected to the same Xylan switch. (as it was said in a recent post on atm@freebsd.org by Marc Tinguely, there is no bridged stack on FreeBSD) The Ethernet port of the switch is configured to be in the same VLAN group as the ATM port, and the group is configured as a point-to-point bridge. We have a RadCom analyser, connected between the switch and the PCA adapter When we try to ping the Ethernet PC from the ATM PC, we see the following : - an encapsulated echo request is sent via the ATM fiber, is de-encpasulated by the switch, sent over the Ethernet, and then received py the Ethernet PC - the Ethernet PC replies, the Ethernet frame is encapsulated by the switch, is sent over the ATM fiber, but is not seen from the Fore adapter. upon closer examination, we have seen that the Ethernet frame sent by the PCA adapter is sent without Ethernet FCS, and the Ethernet FCS is added when the frame is sent over the Ethernet port, but the frame on the return trip is encapsulated with the FCS. When we look at the PDUs sent when pinging from an ATM PC to another ATM PC, there is no Ethernet FCS in the encapsulated frames (there is in this case a good connection between the two machines). The question is then : does the Fore ATM driver discard frames which are encapsulated as said in the RFC1483, but which include the Ethernet FCS ? (the two possibilities are legal, when you read the RFC) Thanks in advance for those patient enough to read the full post TfH To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-atm Fri Sep 17 10:57:49 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Received: from inc.net (mailhost.inc.net [204.95.160.26]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F1EF154CF for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 10:57:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from steve@inc.net) Received: from inc.net (niki.noc.inc.net [204.95.194.201]) by inc.net (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA27030; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 12:57:36 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <37E28210.318A5647@inc.net> Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 13:01:52 -0500 From: Steve Kaczkowski Organization: inc.Net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The Hermit Hacker Cc: freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ATM support ... best card, and how good? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > Just building our first FreeBSD at work (I've been using it myself for >5 > years now) to start encroaching on the Solaris domain, and have been told > I require ATM... > > I've seen in LINT that we do have ATM support, just wondering how good it > is (reliable, or still problematic?), what is the best card I can buy (I > saw the Adaptec XX is supported?), and is it only 4.0-CURRENT, or does 3.x > support it well as well? > The ATM support since 3.x has been great, using some SMC ATM Power 155s (Efficient Networks chipset) with the ATM HARP code, no probs. I haven't had a chance to try out FORE Systems PCA-200 cards, but I'm assuming they would work just as well.. Good luck! -- Steve Kaczkowski Time Warner Telecom/inc.Net steve@inc.net (414)908-9012 http://www.inc.net (603)737-9209 Fax To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-atm Fri Sep 17 12: 1:27 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Received: from plains.NoDak.edu (plains.NoDak.edu [134.129.111.64]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 900A9158CE for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 12:01:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tinguely@plains.NoDak.edu) Received: (from tinguely@localhost) by plains.NoDak.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA24570; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 14:00:59 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 14:00:59 -0500 (CDT) From: Mark Tinguely Message-Id: <199909171900.OAA24570@plains.NoDak.edu> To: freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG, scrappy@hub.org Subject: Re: ATM support ... best card, and how good? Sender: owner-freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org the question is what ATM stack do you need and what signalling. the NATM code provides a socket interface for native ATM. the HARP code will provide IETF's Classical IP over ATM. I believe UNI 3.1 signalling. There is no LANE, nor MPOA support on FreeBSD. --mark. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message