From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Feb 14 00:45:22 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA04028 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Sun, 14 Feb 1999 00:45:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from TomQNX.tomqnx.com (cpu2745.adsl.bellglobal.com [207.236.55.214]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA04023 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 1999 00:45:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from root@tomqnx.com) Received: by TomQNX.tomqnx.com (Smail3.2 #1) id m10BxB1-000I2vC; Sun, 14 Feb 1999 03:45:19 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: From: root@tomqnx.com (Tom Torrance at home Root) Subject: cvsup query To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 03:45:19 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I am running version 16.0 on RELENG_3 obtained from the cvsup-bin port. I just ran a cvsup to cvsup3 and it added deltas to amd.map and config.c (the server was running 16.0 cvsup server). I then ran the same update to cvsup.freebsd.org which was running U_1999_01_15_18_18_08. It said 'Falling back to protocol version 15.5'. This run checked out new versions of amd.map and config.c over the modified versions. Obviously this would be what would happen if cvsup3 were more up-to-date than cvsup, but I had thought that cvsup was the master (perhaps incorrectly...). Was this normal operation? Regards, Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message