From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Feb 21  0:21:56 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B36D510E0B
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 21 Feb 1999 00:21:32 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from imp@village.org)
Received: from harmony [10.0.0.6] 
	by rover.village.org with esmtp (Exim 1.71 #1)
	id 10EU8o-0003Nf-00; Sun, 21 Feb 1999 01:21:30 -0700
Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.2/8.8.3) with ESMTP id BAA00506; Sun, 21 Feb 1999 01:20:56 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <199902210820.BAA00506@harmony.village.org>
To: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD mention in LWN interview with A.C. 
Cc: Jamie Bowden <jamie@itribe.net>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 16 Feb 1999 11:09:15 PST."
		<XFMail.990216110915.jdp@polstra.com> 
References: <XFMail.990216110915.jdp@polstra.com>  
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 1999 01:20:56 -0700
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In message <XFMail.990216110915.jdp@polstra.com> John Polstra writes:
: Of course I'm biased, but that doesn't change the validity of my
: statement.

cvsup is faster than perforce, from what I can tell, but perforce is
faster at remote operations, generally, the cvs.

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message