From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Feb 21 0:37:54 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from verdi.nethelp.no (verdi.nethelp.no [158.36.41.162]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AC43910E54 for ; Sun, 21 Feb 1999 00:37:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sthaug@nethelp.no) Received: (qmail 21257 invoked by uid 1001); 21 Feb 1999 08:26:28 +0000 (GMT) To: jkb@best.com Cc: grog@lemis.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, FreeBSD-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: New breakin technique? From: sthaug@nethelp.no In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 20 Feb 1999 22:14:53 -0800" References: <19990220221453.B15747@best.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.05+ on Emacs 19.34.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 21 Feb 1999 09:26:28 +0100 Message-ID: <21255.919585588@verdi.nethelp.no> Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > This should go to -security@ but anyway - they think that > freebie is a solaris box. There is remote exploit for rpc.statd > for solaris. See: > http://www.geek-girl.com/bugtraq/1997_4/0378.html > But please don't run rpc.statd if you don't need it in any > case? Thanks, :) So why are rpc.statd and portmap started by default in FreeBSD? (I've been turning them off since I started using FreeBSD. Now, with the /etc/defaults/rc.conf mechanism, it's real easy to keep my local mods :-) Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message