Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 17:10:32 +0900 From: Akinori MUSHA aka knu <knu@idaemons.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/14359: Update port: mail/imap-uw Message-ID: <86hfh69l6v.wl@daemon.local.idaemons.org> In-Reply-To: In your message of "Thu, 23 Dec 1999 11:02:47 %2B0200 (EET)" <Pine.BSF.4.10.9912231033170.15014-100000@ady.warpnet.ro> References: <86ogbj2fb0.wl@localhost.local.idaemons.org> <Pine.BSF.4.10.9912231033170.15014-100000@ady.warpnet.ro>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,
At Thu, 23 Dec 1999 11:02:47 +0200 (EET),
Adrian Penisoara <ady@freebsd.ady.ro> wrote:
> But wait, isn't there an option to convince the port not to verify the
> checksum for some of the source tarballs ?
I found the way! Just include those changeable files onto the
IGNOREFILES list, and the checksums will be ignored. An aspirin. :-)
But we must be careful to do such a thing since there will be
a risk of our getting harmed by trojan horses, not just that a change
of the tarball may cause a failure in applying patches.
Alternatively, why not put "files/imap-utils.tar.bz2.uu"
(which is about 35KB in size) or just have another master sites? (I
can provide some)
By the way, seems you integrated safegets.[ch] into mlock.c,
but I think they'd better stand alone because imap-utils also use
them. I'm currently working on a mail/imap-utils port and I'll send
it with a fix to the imap-uw port. Stay tuned.
--
/
/__ __
/ ) ) ) ) / http://www.idaemons.org/knu/
Akinori MUSHA aka / (_ / ( (__( mailto:knu@idaemons.org
"We are but hungry.. Associated Ita-meshi Daemons!"
http://www.idaemons.org/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86hfh69l6v.wl>