From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jan 10 01:45:53 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA24981
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 01:45:53 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from sbtx.tmn.ru (sbtx.tmn.ru [194.84.2.73])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA24976
          for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 01:45:50 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from bor@sbtx.tmn.ru)
Received: from bm (bm.telecom.tmn.ru [194.84.70.36])
	by sbtx.tmn.ru (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA25658
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 14:45:14 +0500 (ES)
Message-ID: <005401be3c7d$ebf91220$244654c2@bm.telecom.tmn.ru>
From: "Boris Mikhailov" <bor@sbtx.tmn.ru>
To: <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: subscribe freebsd-stable
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 14:45:12 +0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="koi8-r"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3155.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

subscribe freebsd-stable



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jan 10 10:10:33 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA20058
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 10:10:33 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from Raccoon.ChipChat.com (Raccoon.ChipChat.com [206.2.228.130])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA20053
          for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 10:10:31 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from fbsdstab@Raccoon.ChipChat.com)
Received: from localhost (fbsdstab@localhost)
	by Raccoon.ChipChat.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id SAA00998;
	Sun, 10 Jan 1999 18:09:52 GMT
	(envelope-from fbsdstab@Raccoon.ChipChat.com)
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 18:09:52 +0000 (GMT)
From: FreeBSD Stable <fbsdstab@Raccoon.ChipChat.com>
To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG
cc: mrc@ChipChat.com
Subject: make installworld trouble
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.01.9901101747220.910-100000@Raccoon.ChipChat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hello BSDaemons!

  I have two machines: "Source-code" machine, and a "non-Source" machine.

Trying to do a "make installworld"
from "non-Source" machine,
using the '/usr/src' and '/usr/obj' directories on the "Source" machine.
I encounter an error.

--------------
ERROR MESSAGE:
--------------

-----------[CUT from Terminal Session]--------------
===> lib/libalias
install -C -o bin -g bin -m 444 /usr/src/lib/libalias/alias.h
/usr/include
install -c -o bin -g bin -m 444   libalias.a /usr/lib
install -c -o bin -g bin -m 444   libalias_p.a /usr/lib
install: libalias_p.a: No such file or directory
*** Error code 71
Stop.
*** Error code 1
Stop.
*** Error code 1
Stop.
*** Error code 1
Stop.
*** Error code 1
Stop.
----------------------[Cut]-------------------------------

-----------------------------------
HOW I ATTEMPT TO INSTALL THE UPDATE
-----------------------------------
"Source code" machine is running 2.2.8-Stable as of 99-01-09,
with rebuilt kernel.
  #pwd
   /usr/src
  #make buildworld        (This seems OK)
  #make installworld      (This seems OK)

"Non-source" machine is running 2.2.7-Stable as of 99-11-09.
  #mount (source machine hostname):/usr/src /usr/src
  #mount (source machine hostname):/usr/obj /usr/obj
      (These seeem to be OK)
  #pwd
   /usr/src
  #make installworld
   (some things seem to install OK)
  (error)

  Also tried:
  #make reinstall
  (same trouble as 'installworld')

----------------
PREVIOUS SUCCESS
----------------
I was able to do this in November (which is how I upgraded the non-source
machine from 2.2.6-Release to 2.2.7-Stable).

Any direction, suggestions, or comments are welcome.

Marty Cawthon
mrc@ChipChat.com
ChipChat



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jan 10 10:33:48 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA24400
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 10:33:48 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from Piman-Orange.ChipChat.com (Piman-Orange.ChipChat.com [206.2.228.146])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA24378
          for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 10:33:45 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from mrc@ChipChat.com)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by Piman-Orange.ChipChat.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA01657;
	Sun, 10 Jan 1999 18:33:11 GMT
	(envelope-from mrc@ChipChat.com)
To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc: mrc@ChipChat.com
Subject: Re: make installworld trouble
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 10 Jan 1999 18:09:52 +0000 (GMT)"
	<Pine.BSF.4.01.9901101747220.910-100000@Raccoon.ChipChat.com>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.01.9901101747220.910-100000@Raccoon.ChipChat.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.93 on XEmacs 20.4 (Emerald)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <19990110183310X.mrc@ChipChat.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 18:33:10 GMT
From: Marty Cawthon <mrc@ChipChat.com>
X-Dispatcher: imput version 980905(IM100)
Lines: 52
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


 Here is what I wrote moments before I read about the solution to my problem:

fbsdstab> Hello BSDaemons!
fbsdstab> 
fbsdstab>   I have two machines: "Source-code" machine, and a "non-Source" machine.
fbsdstab> 
fbsdstab> Trying to do a "make installworld"
fbsdstab> from "non-Source" machine,
fbsdstab> using the '/usr/src' and '/usr/obj' directories on the "Source" machine.
fbsdstab> I encounter an error.
fbsdstab> 
fbsdstab> --------------
fbsdstab> ERROR MESSAGE:
fbsdstab> --------------
fbsdstab> 
<SNIP>
fbsdstab> install -c -o bin -g bin -m 444   libalias_p.a /usr/lib
fbsdstab> install: libalias_p.a: No such file or directory
fbsdstab> *** Error code 71
fbsdstab> Stop.
<SNIP>
fbsdstab> ----------------
fbsdstab> PREVIOUS SUCCESS
fbsdstab> ----------------
fbsdstab> I was able to do this in November (which is how I upgraded the non-source
fbsdstab> machine from 2.2.6-Release to 2.2.7-Stable).
fbsdstab> 
fbsdstab> Any direction, suggestions, or comments are welcome.

  Within a few minutes of this posting I started reading thru my "-Current" mailing list,
and saw a similar question posted there (regarding -Current, not -Stable).
  What I did a few weeks ago on my "source code" machine was to set
NOPROFILE=true
  as recommended in one of the on-line FreeBSD tutorials.
I understand what this does, and what 'profiling libraries' are.

  However I did not set that also on my 'non-source' machine.
This problem, and solution were discussed on the -Current Mailing List.
  I changed my (non-source)/etc/make.conf to read
NOPROFILE=true
and it my 'make installworld' is running fine right now.

  I should have thought more about the name 'libalias_p.a' (_p as in 'profiling'),
and may have remembered the 'NOPROFILE' change that I made earlier to the 'source machine'.
I regret any inconvenience that my question has caused.

  I appreciate the excellent quality of FreeBSD, and the friendly cooperative spirit of
many FreeBSDers.  I hope to contribute to the FreeBSD effort in the future.

Marty Cawthon
ChipChat

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 11 13:33:24 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA03973
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 13:33:24 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from alcanet.com.au (border.alcanet.com.au [203.62.196.10])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA03967
          for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 13:33:20 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from peter.jeremy@auss2.alcatel.com.au)
Received: by border.alcanet.com.au id <40333>; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 08:31:59 +1100
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 08:32:38 +1100
From: Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@auss2.alcatel.com.au>
Subject: Re: IRQ entropy causes panics?
To: steve@Watt.COM
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Message-Id: <99Jan12.083159est.40333@border.alcanet.com.au>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Sat 9th January, Steve Watt <steve@Watt.COM> wrote:
>Is there a microtime() call already made at each interrupt entry?
No.

>  Something on
>the order of 5uS on a faster ISA system I tested on

On a non-SMP P5 or later system RDTSC is a cheap and accurate
alternative.  [The problem on SMP systems is that the TSCs aren't
synchronised so you need to know which CPU you are on to use it].

On 3.x, both microtime() and nanotime() will use RDTSC (and not
perform any ISA bus cycles) if a working TSC is found, SMP is not
defined and either it isn't an APM BIOS, or APM isn't compiled into
the kernel.  The actual clock being used, together with the lowest
level overhead of calling it, is reported by default during boot, eg
'Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz cost 2376 ns'

On 2.x, microtime() will use RDTSC if support for 586/686 is compiled
in and a working TSC is found.

Peter
--
Peter Jeremy (VK2PJ)                    peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au
Alcatel Australia Limited
41 Mandible St                          Phone: +61 2 9690 5019
ALEXANDRIA  NSW  2015                   Fax:   +61 2 9690 5982

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 11 20:35:53 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA24232
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 20:35:53 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (castles165.castles.com [208.214.165.165])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA24227
          for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 20:35:47 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com)
Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dingo.cdrom.com (8.9.1/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA00469;
	Mon, 11 Jan 1999 20:31:38 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com)
Message-Id: <199901120431.UAA00469@dingo.cdrom.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98
To: Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@auss2.alcatel.com.au>
cc: steve@Watt.COM, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: IRQ entropy causes panics? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 12 Jan 1999 08:32:38 +1100."
             <99Jan12.083159est.40333@border.alcanet.com.au> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 20:31:37 -0800
From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> On Sat 9th January, Steve Watt <steve@Watt.COM> wrote:
> >Is there a microtime() call already made at each interrupt entry?
> No.
> 
> >  Something on
> >the order of 5uS on a faster ISA system I tested on
> 
> On a non-SMP P5 or later system RDTSC is a cheap and accurate
> alternative.  [The problem on SMP systems is that the TSCs aren't
> synchronised so you need to know which CPU you are on to use it].
> 
> On 3.x, both microtime() and nanotime() will use RDTSC (and not
> perform any ISA bus cycles) if a working TSC is found, SMP is not
> defined and either it isn't an APM BIOS, or APM isn't compiled into
> the kernel.  The actual clock being used, together with the lowest
> level overhead of calling it, is reported by default during boot, eg
> 'Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz cost 2376 ns'

Note that the TSC can't be relied upon, even if no APM BIOS was found.  

The default timecounter code in current can detect when the assumptions 
it's making about the progression of time are faulty, but Poul didn't 
want to make the compensation for this (which it can also make) either 
the default or automatic.  Talk to him about that.

-- 
\\  Sometimes you're ahead,       \\  Mike Smith
\\  sometimes you're behind.      \\  mike@smith.net.au
\\  The race is long, and in the  \\  msmith@freebsd.org
\\  end it's only with yourself.  \\  msmith@cdrom.com



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 12 00:02:35 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA13139
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 00:02:35 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from beatrice.rutgers.edu (beatrice.rutgers.edu [165.230.209.143])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA13134
          for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 00:02:34 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from easmith@beatrice.rutgers.edu)
Received: (from easmith@localhost) by beatrice.rutgers.edu (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id DAA02477; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 03:01:22 -0500 (EST)
From: "Allen Smith" <easmith@beatrice.rutgers.edu>
Message-Id: <9901120301.ZM2476@beatrice.rutgers.edu>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 03:01:22 -0500
In-Reply-To: Studded <Studded@gorean.org>    "Re: Is 'xntpd' broken in -stable?" (Oct 25,  4:14am)
References: <199810091927.MAA14061@implode.root.com> 
	<9810241606.ZM2203@beatrice.rutgers.edu> 
	<3632EBD7.717C0B6F@gorean.org>
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.3 08feb96 MediaMail)
To: Studded <Studded@gorean.org>
Subject: Re: Is 'xntpd' broken in -stable?
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Oct 25,  4:14am, Studded (possibly) wrote:

Sorry about the delay...

> Allen Smith wrote:
> 
> > I've checked with Dave Mills on this issue, and there's an option (-x,
> > which is unfortunately not in the help files) in ntpd (as opposed to
> > xntpd, which is about as obsolete/nonsupported as FreeBSD-1.x) 

I apologize for exaggerating. It's more like FreeBSD-2.1.

> 	Posted this on another list...I disagree with your characterization as
> much as I'd like to see our version of xntpd updated. The xntpd branch
> is still maintained and updated, as recently as 4/27/98 for the most
> recent stable version, and August 10th for the most recent beta.

Well... currently, Dave Mills has stated that they aren't maintaining
xntpd any longer; any updates are through patches they've accepted,
but have not necessarily done testing on. ntpd-4.0.91 appears
sufficiently stable that they're going to make it into ntpd-4.1 and an 
official 'release' pretty soon.

	-Allen

-- 
Allen Smith				easmith@beatrice.rutgers.edu
	

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 12 07:46:17 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA04034
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 07:46:17 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from alecto.physics.uiuc.edu (alecto.physics.uiuc.edu [130.126.8.20])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA04028
          for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 07:46:15 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from igor@alecto.physics.uiuc.edu)
Received: (from igor@localhost)
	by alecto.physics.uiuc.edu (8.9.0/8.9.0) id JAA18657
	for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 09:45:41 -0600 (CST)
From: Igor Roshchin <igor@physics.uiuc.edu>
Message-Id: <199901121545.JAA18657@alecto.physics.uiuc.edu>
Subject: Re: How to install two FreeBSD releases a single disc? (fwd)
To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 09:45:41 -0600 (CST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I haven't heard from Mike, so I decided to post this question back
to -stable list.

Any help ?

Thanks!

Igor

----- Forwarded message from Igor Roshchin -----


On 7 December 1998, Mike Smith proclaimed:
> > I like to install FreeBSD 2.2.7 (2.2.8) and 3.0 on the same disc.
> > Because the FreeBSD boot loader looks for the first compatibility slice, it
> 's
> > only possible to boot from the first installed release (first slice).
> 
> Install the 'new' bootstrap from 3.0 on both the 2.2 and 3.0 slices.
> See the 'disklabel' manpage; the new bootstrap lives in the files 
> /boot/boot1 and /boot/boot2 on the 3.0 install's root filesystem.


Hello, Mike,

About a month ago you wrote the above mentioned message.

I could not get it loading from the second slice of the same disk
in the configuration where two different versions of FreeBSD reside on
one hard drive on different slices.

I think I might be missing something.

Let me also ask you what you meant by talking about having the bootstrap
"on both slices".
Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought that the bootstrap is installed
on a disk, and not per slice.

Another question - how do you specify in the /etc/boot.config -
which slice to boot up from ?

Thanks,

Igor

----- End of forwarded message from Igor Roshchin -----

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 12 07:54:49 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA04872
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 07:54:49 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from dt087nac.san.rr.com (dt051n92.san.rr.com [204.210.32.146])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA04866
          for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 07:54:47 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from Studded@gorean.org)
Received: from gorean.org (master [10.0.0.2])
	by dt087nac.san.rr.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA26863;
	Tue, 12 Jan 1999 07:54:51 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from Studded@gorean.org)
Message-ID: <369A1EC2.61BEA6E1@gorean.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 07:54:42 -0800
From: Studded <Studded@gorean.org>
Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Allen Smith <easmith@beatrice.rutgers.edu>
CC: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Is 'xntpd' broken in -stable?
References: <199810091927.MAA14061@implode.root.com> 
		<9810241606.ZM2203@beatrice.rutgers.edu> 
		<3632EBD7.717C0B6F@gorean.org> <9901120301.ZM2476@beatrice.rutgers.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Allen Smith wrote:
> 
> On Oct 25,  4:14am, Studded (possibly) wrote:

> >       Posted this on another list...I disagree with your characterization as
> > much as I'd like to see our version of xntpd updated. The xntpd branch
> > is still maintained and updated, as recently as 4/27/98 for the most
> > recent stable version, and August 10th for the most recent beta.
> 
> Well... currently, Dave Mills has stated that they aren't maintaining
> xntpd any longer; any updates are through patches they've accepted,
> but have not necessarily done testing on.

	Let's put it this way. Their version of xntpd is much better supported
than ours is. :) 

 ntpd-4.0.91 appears
> sufficiently stable that they're going to make it into ntpd-4.1 and an
> official 'release' pretty soon.

	Well it's too late to do anything with 2.2-Stable. Therefore
contrib'ifying the release of ntpd for 3.something would be the way to
go at this point.

Doug
--
***           Chief Operations Officer, DALnet IRC network          ***

     Like desperadoes waiting for a train . . .

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 12 08:13:43 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA07104
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 08:13:43 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from alcatel.fr (gatekeeper.alcatel.fr [194.133.58.131])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA06918
          for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 08:13:34 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from Thierry.Herbelot@alcatel.fr)
Received: from alcatel.fr (gatekeeper-ssn.alcatel.fr [155.132.180.244])
        by mailgate.alcatel.fr (ALCANET/SMTP) with ESMTP id RAA20904;
        Tue, 12 Jan 1999 17:11:34 +0100
Received: from lune.telspace.alcatel.fr (lune.telspace.alcatel.fr [155.132.144.65])
        by aifhs2.alcatel.fr (ALCANET/SMTP2) with ESMTP id RAA09397;
        Tue, 12 Jan 1999 17:10:18 +0100 (MET)
Received: from telss1 (telss1.telspace.alcatel.fr [155.132.51.4])
	by lune.telspace.alcatel.fr (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id QAA29009;
	Tue, 12 Jan 1999 16:53:29 +0100 (MET)
Received: from telspace.alcatel.fr (nairobi.telspace.alcatel.fr) by telss1 (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA08969; Tue, 12 Jan 99 17:00:02 +0100
Message-Id: <369B7291.C587E793@telspace.alcatel.fr>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 17:04:33 +0100
From: HERBELOT Thierry <Thierry.Herbelot@alcatel.fr>
Organization: Alcatel Telspace
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; I; SunOS 5.5.1 sun4m)
X-Accept-Language: en
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: Igor Roshchin <igor@physics.uiuc.edu>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: How to install two FreeBSD releases a single disc? (fwd)
References: <199901121545.JAA18657@alecto.physics.uiuc.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Igor Roshchin wrote:
> 
> I haven't heard from Mike, so I decided to post this question back
> to -stable list.
> 
> Any help ?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Igor
> 
> ----- Forwarded message from Igor Roshchin -----
> 
> On 7 December 1998, Mike Smith proclaimed:
> > > I like to install FreeBSD 2.2.7 (2.2.8) and 3.0 on the same disc.
> > > Because the FreeBSD boot loader looks for the first compatibility slice, it
> > 's
> > > only possible to boot from the first installed release (first slice).
> >
> > Install the 'new' bootstrap from 3.0 on both the 2.2 and 3.0 slices.
> > See the 'disklabel' manpage; the new bootstrap lives in the files
> > /boot/boot1 and /boot/boot2 on the 3.0 install's root filesystem.
Hello,

I have asked approx. the same question one month ago (and I don't have
the messages)
There were two interesting answers (one was from Gerg Lehey)

Look in the archives of -questions

	TfH



> 
> Hello, Mike,
> 
> About a month ago you wrote the above mentioned message.
> 
> I could not get it loading from the second slice of the same disk
> in the configuration where two different versions of FreeBSD reside on
> one hard drive on different slices.
> 
> I think I might be missing something.
> 
> Let me also ask you what you meant by talking about having the bootstrap
> "on both slices".
> Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought that the bootstrap is installed
> on a disk, and not per slice.
> 
> Another question - how do you specify in the /etc/boot.config -
> which slice to boot up from ?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Igor
> 
> ----- End of forwarded message from Igor Roshchin -----
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 12 23:47:38 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA16834
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 23:47:38 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from gofur.oct.co.za (gofur.oct.co.za [196.31.78.42])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA16779
          for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 23:47:21 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from tony@oct.co.za)
Received: from tonypc.oct.co.za (tonypc.oct.co.za [196.31.76.55])
	by gofur.oct.co.za (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA11955
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 09:42:37 +0200 (SAT)
	(envelope-from tony@oct.co.za)
Message-ID: <095a01be3ec8$d40f33e0$374c1fc4@tonypc.oct.co.za>
From: "Tony Russell" <tony@oct.co.za>
To: <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: make release
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 09:46:26 +0200
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hi

I am tinkering with "make release" and it gives up on the
following command
install -c -o bin -g bin -m 444 FAQ*.html
/R/stage/trees/doc/usr/share/doc/ru/FAQ

After a bit of digging I see that
/R/stage/trees/doc/usr/share/doc/ru does not exist, it seems
that this is why the command fails.

I have followed FAQ 13.2 and have sec-all sec-eBones src-secure
src-crypto ports-all www doc-all in my supfile. I am using
RELEASETAG=RELENG_2_2.

Any suggestions?
-------------------------------------------------------------
Tony Russell                                Technical Manager
mailto:tony@oct.co.za                    http://www.oct.co.za
Voice:+27(21)689-7090                  Mobile:+27(83)264-0107
Open Computer Technology (Pty) Ltd - Cape Town - South Africa
              A member of the Connection Group



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 13 15:33:56 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA20727
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 15:33:56 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from amber.ghostwheel.com (amber.ghostwheel.com [207.201.56.89])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA20719
          for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 15:33:54 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from merlin@ghostwheel.com)
Received: from amber.ghostwheel.com (amber.ghostwheel.com [207.201.56.89])
	by amber.ghostwheel.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA01133
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 15:32:59 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 15:32:59 -0800 (PST)
From: Christopher Knight <merlin@ghostwheel.com>
To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: false error while adding user via sysinstall
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990113152543.1118A-100000@amber.ghostwheel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I was trying to add a user named '2grnflcn' to my system via
/stand/sysinstall and was given the error that this user already exists.
I checked with vipw to make sure I wasn't being absent minded, and the
user is not there.  If there is a valid reason this account can't exist,
then sysinstall needs to give a more informative response.  

My system was updated prior to compile on:

FreeBSD shadows.ghostwheel.com 3.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT #9: Sun Jan
10 10:43:20 PST 1999 
merlin@shadows.ghostwheel.com:/usr/src/sys/compile/SHADOWS  i386

A manual useradd worked correctly with the same information.

-ck


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 13 18:50:26 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA03886
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 18:50:26 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from 2.hot.cl (node1e2d.a2000.nl [62.108.30.45])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA03877
          for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 18:50:22 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from niels@hot.cl)
Received: from localhost (niels@localhost)
	by 2.hot.cl (8.8.8/HOTCL) with SMTP id DAA21474;
	Thu, 14 Jan 1999 03:48:38 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from niels@hot.cl)
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 03:48:37 +0100 (CET)
From: Niels Kroon <niels@hot.cl>
To: Igor Roshchin <igor@physics.uiuc.edu>
cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: How to install two FreeBSD releases a single disc? (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <199901121545.JAA18657@alecto.physics.uiuc.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.01.9901140336500.20062-100000@2.hot.cl>
X-Location: Amsterdam The Netherlands
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Tue, 12 Jan 1999, Igor Roshchin wrote:

> On 7 December 1998, Mike Smith proclaimed:
> > > I like to install FreeBSD 2.2.7 (2.2.8) and 3.0 on the same disc.
> > > Because the FreeBSD boot loader looks for the first compatibility slice, it
> > 's
> > > only possible to boot from the first installed release (first slice).
> > 
> > Install the 'new' bootstrap from 3.0 on both the 2.2 and 3.0 slices.
> > See the 'disklabel' manpage; the new bootstrap lives in the files 
> > /boot/boot1 and /boot/boot2 on the 3.0 install's root filesystem.
> 
> 
> Hello, Mike,
> 
> About a month ago you wrote the above mentioned message.
> 
> I could not get it loading from the second slice of the same disk
> in the configuration where two different versions of FreeBSD reside on
> one hard drive on different slices.
> 
> I think I might be missing something.
> 
> Let me also ask you what you meant by talking about having the bootstrap
> "on both slices".
> Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought that the bootstrap is installed
> on a disk, and not per slice.
> 
> Another question - how do you specify in the /etc/boot.config -
> which slice to boot up from ?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Igor
> 

Hi,

I installed FreeBSD 3.0 on /dev/wd0s1 and did a "disklabel -B /dev/wd0s1"
for the new bootloader.  Then I installed 2.2.8 also on /dev/wd0s2
(because I encountered a lot of "cannot make makefiles errors" while
compiline ports which use imake, like xv and xpaint, installing 2.2.8
solves this problem, anyone?)

For default loading the kernel from the 2.2.8 partition I specified in
/boot/boot.conf on the 3.0 partition this:

set rootdev=disk2s2a:
set currdev=disk2s2a:

Maybe you have another disk number, but check this maualy by breaking the
boot process, the prompt shows the current disk number. 

Niels


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 13 20:11:23 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA12331
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 20:11:23 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from foobar.franken.de (foobar.franken.de [194.94.249.81])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA12324
          for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 20:11:20 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from logix@foobar.franken.de)
Received: (from logix@localhost)
	by foobar.franken.de (8.8.8/8.8.5) id FAA18271;
	Thu, 14 Jan 1999 05:10:22 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <19990114051022.A18149@foobar.franken.de>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 05:10:22 +0100
From: Harold Gutch <logix@foobar.franken.de>
To: Christopher Knight <merlin@ghostwheel.com>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: false error while adding user via sysinstall
References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990113152543.1118A-100000@amber.ghostwheel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990113152543.1118A-100000@amber.ghostwheel.com>; from Christopher Knight on Wed, Jan 13, 1999 at 03:32:59PM -0800
X-Organisation: BatmanSystemDistribution
X-Mission: To free the world from the Penguin
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Wed, Jan 13, 1999 at 03:32:59PM -0800, Christopher Knight wrote:
> I was trying to add a user named '2grnflcn' to my system via
> /stand/sysinstall and was given the error that this user already exists.

The error is somewhere in pw(8) - from a quick point of view it
seems as if pw will assume that a user with a loginname starting
with a digit has that UID, so in your case pw (which is called by
sysinstall) found that the user you specified already existed and
had the the UID 2.
This clearly is a bug, you might file a PR on this topic.

I'll have a closer look at pw tomorrow (unless I see somebody
having fixed it by then).

-- 
bye, logix

<Shabby> Sleep is an abstinence syndrome wich occurs due to lack of caffein.
Wed Mar  4 04:53:33 CET 1998   #unix, ircnet

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 13 23:58:53 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA04821
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 23:58:53 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from chrome.dreamscape.com (chrome.dreamscape.com [206.64.128.4])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA04810
          for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 23:58:51 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from krentel@dreamscape.com)
Received: from ultra1.dreamscape.com (ultra1.dreamscape.com [206.64.128.7])
	by chrome.dreamscape.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA27566
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 02:57:40 -0500 (EST)
X-Dreamscape-Track-Chrome-A: ultra1.dreamscape.com [206.64.128.7]
X-Dreamscape-Track-Chrome-B: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 02:57:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: from dreamscape.com (sA6-p38.dreamscape.com [207.198.13.166])
          by ultra1.dreamscape.com (8.8.5/8.8.4) with ESMTP
	  id CAA16841 for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 02:02:40 -0500 (EST)
X-Dreamscape-Track-A: sA6-p38.dreamscape.com [207.198.13.166]
X-Dreamscape-Track-B: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 02:02:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from krentel@localhost)
	by dreamscape.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA00951
	for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 02:02:30 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from krentel)
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 02:02:30 -0500 (EST)
From: "Mark W. Krentel" <krentel@dreamscape.com>
Message-Id: <199901140702.CAA00951@dreamscape.com>
To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: scsiformat timeout
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I'm having a problem with scsiformat in 2.2.8-release.
/sbin/scsiformat is an sh script that issues the command: 

    scsi -s 28800 -f $RAW -c "4 0 0 0 0 0"

where $RAW is something like /dev/rsd1.ctl.  The problem seems to be
that 28800 seconds (8 hours) is too long.  Between 2.2.7 and 2.2.8,
this number was bumped up from 14400 in response to PR 7803 which
complained that 14400 was too small and cited an example disk that
takes >4 hours to format. 

Anyway, when I run scsiformat on a zip100 disk (scsi drive), the
command returns immediately with this message:

    # scsiformat -q -w sd1 
    IOMEGA 
    ZIP 100 
    E.11 

    This will destroy all data on this drive!
    Hit return to continue, or INTR (^C) to abort: 
    Formatting... this may take a while.
    SCIOCCOMMAND ioctl: Command accepted.
    return status 1 (Command Timeout) after 28800000 msCommand out (6 of 6):
    04 00 00 00 00 00 

    No sense sent.
    # 

And this appears on the console (when I get out of X windows):

    sd1(ahc0:3:0): SCB 0x0 - timed out in command phase,
        SCSISIGI == 0x84  SEQADDR = 0x48  SCSISEQ = 0x12
        SSTAT0 = 0x7  SSTAT1 = 0x2
    sd1(ahc0:3:0): abort message in message buffer
    sd1(ahc0:3:0): SCB 0 - Abort completed
    sd1(ahc0:3:0): no longer in timeout

I tried running scsi directly and fiddled with the -s (timeout) parameter.
Turns out that any number greater than 22000 produces the above error
and anything smaller than 21000 works fine (takes about 9 min to format).

Now, this is no tragedy because I can always run scsi directly or edit
the scsiformat script on my system.  But I am wondering just what is
the problem.

Is 28800 really too large, or does it work on some systems?
Does this vary by controller or disk?  Don't blame the zip disk; I get 
the same error with my old Seagate ST31200N (1 gig, from June 94).

I have a PPro 166, ASUS 440FX mobo and Adaptec 2940-UW controller
(about 2 years old).  Nothing special in the kernel:

    controller      ahc0
    controller      scbus0
    device          sd0
    device          cd0
    options         SCSI_DELAY=3

--Mark Krentel

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Jan 14 14:02:46 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA16115
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 14:02:46 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from home.gis.net (home.gis.net [208.218.130.20])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA16110
          for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 14:02:43 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from brent@gis.net)
Received: from gis.net (host224.193.113.209.netblock.ri.110.net [209.113.193.224]) by home.gis.net (8.8.8/8.8.8+djf) with ESMTP id RAA01976 for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 17:01:35 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <30E7942B.F865B5E5@gis.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Jan 1996 02:58:36 -0500
From: Brent Holden <brent@gis.net>
Reply-To: brent@gis.net
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en]C-NECCK  (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: mailing list
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

i'd like to be put on your mailing list.
thanks.

brent


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Jan 14 14:06:20 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA16734
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 14:06:20 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from techpower.net (techpower.net [205.133.231.1])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA16729
          for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 14:06:17 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from hometeam@techpower.net)
Received: from localhost (hometeam@localhost)
	by techpower.net (8.9.2/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA11283;
	Thu, 14 Jan 1999 17:04:23 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from hometeam@techpower.net)
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 17:04:23 -0500 (EST)
From: Jt <hometeam@techpower.net>
To: Brent Holden <brent@gis.net>
cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: mailing list
In-Reply-To: <30E7942B.F865B5E5@gis.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9901141703030.11281-100000@techpower.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


www.freebsd.org info theres on joining the this it is automatic.


On Mon, 1 Jan 1996, Brent Holden wrote:

> i'd like to be put on your mailing list.
> thanks.
> 
> brent
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Jan 14 14:11:11 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA17313
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 14:11:11 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from mercury.jorsm.com (mercury.jorsm.com [207.112.128.9])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA17299
          for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 14:11:05 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jer@jorsm.com)
Received: from localhost (jer@localhost)
	by mercury.jorsm.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id QAA06711;
	Thu, 14 Jan 1999 16:09:51 -0600 (CST)
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 16:09:50 -0600 (CST)
From: Jeremy Shaffner <jer@jorsm.com>
To: freebsd-errata-update@roguetrader.com
cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: ERRATA NOTICE: FreeBSD 2.2.8-RELEASE
In-Reply-To: <199901071300.GAA22022@ice.cold.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.990114160610.24274D-100000@mercury.jorsm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Thu, 7 Jan 1999 freebsd-errata-update@roguetrader.com wrote:

>      user name.  To correct this behaviour, libc needs to be patched and
>      recompiled.  The appropriate patch can be obtained from
>      http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/lib/libc/gen/getpwent.c.diff?r1=1.35.2.2&r2=1.35.2.3

Ok..I've fetched and patched getpwent.c.  So now what?  `make install`?
>From what directory?

-Jeremy


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Jan 14 18:29:13 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA27425
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 18:29:13 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au (pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au [202.14.186.30])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA27405
          for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 18:29:01 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from carl@xena.IPAustralia.gov.au)
Received: (from smap@localhost)
	by pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id NAA27395
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 15 Jan 1999 13:27:46 +1100 (EST)
Received: from newton.aipo.gov.au(10.0.100.18) by pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au via smap (V2.0)
	id xma027389; Fri, 15 Jan 99 13:27:32 +1100
Received: from localhost (carl@localhost)
	by newton.aipo.gov.au (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id NAA00636
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 15 Jan 1999 13:27:32 +1100 (EST)
	(envelope-from carl@xena.aipo.gov.au)
X-Authentication-Warning: newton.aipo.gov.au: carl owned process doing -bs
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 13:27:32 +1100 (EST)
From: Carl Makin <carl@xena.IPAustralia.gov.au>
X-Sender: carl@newton.aipo.gov.au
To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Cisco/Intel Ethernet Trunking
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.01.9901151325050.492-100000@newton.aipo.gov.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


Cisco seems to think that FreeBSD supports ethernet trunking, where
multiple fxp cards in the machine connect to multiple 100BaseT ports on
the switch and all appear as 1 "port" at 100/200/300/400 MB/s.

Is this actually supported in stable?  If so how do you set it up?

Carl.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Jan 14 18:33:41 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA27975
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 18:33:41 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from gjp.erols.com (alex-va-n008c079.moon.jic.com [206.156.18.89])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA27970
          for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 18:33:39 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from gjp@gjp.erols.com)
Received: from gjp.erols.com (localhost.erols.com [127.0.0.1])
	by gjp.erols.com (8.9.1/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA80127;
	Thu, 14 Jan 1999 21:32:13 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from gjp@gjp.erols.com)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.1 12/23/97
To: Carl Makin <carl@xena.IPAustralia.gov.au>
cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
From: "Gary Palmer" <gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: Cisco/Intel Ethernet Trunking 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 15 Jan 1999 13:27:32 +1100."
             <Pine.BSF.4.01.9901151325050.492-100000@newton.aipo.gov.au> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 21:32:13 -0500
Message-ID: <80124.916367533@gjp.erols.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Carl Makin wrote in message ID
<Pine.BSF.4.01.9901151325050.492-100000@newton.aipo.gov.au>:
> 
> Cisco seems to think that FreeBSD supports ethernet trunking

Where did they say that?

Gary
--
Gary Palmer                                          FreeBSD Core Team Member
FreeBSD: Turning PC's into workstations. See http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/ for info



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Jan 14 18:58:08 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA01391
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 18:58:08 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au (pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au [202.14.186.30])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA01338;
          Thu, 14 Jan 1999 18:57:58 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from carl@xena.IPAustralia.gov.au)
Received: (from smap@localhost)
	by pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id NAA28143;
	Fri, 15 Jan 1999 13:56:47 +1100 (EST)
Received: from newton.aipo.gov.au(10.0.100.18) by pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au via smap (V2.0)
	id xma028135; Fri, 15 Jan 99 13:56:34 +1100
Received: from localhost (carl@localhost)
	by newton.aipo.gov.au (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id NAA00839;
	Fri, 15 Jan 1999 13:56:33 +1100 (EST)
	(envelope-from carl@xena.aipo.gov.au)
X-Authentication-Warning: newton.aipo.gov.au: carl owned process doing -bs
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 13:56:33 +1100 (EST)
From: Carl Makin <carl@xena.IPAustralia.gov.au>
X-Sender: carl@newton.aipo.gov.au
To: Gary Palmer <gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG>
cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Cisco/Intel Ethernet Trunking 
In-Reply-To: <80124.916367533@gjp.erols.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.01.9901151349560.492-100000@newton.aipo.gov.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


On Thu, 14 Jan 1999, Gary Palmer wrote:

> Carl Makin wrote

>> Cisco seems to think that FreeBSD supports ethernet trunking

> Where did they say that?

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/729/fec/fchan_an.htm

I did get it slightly wrong though, It was a magazine, Asia-Pacific Data
Communications, December 1998 issue, page 64/65, that says both Intel and
Phobos make cards with Fast Etherchannel support that is supported under
FreeBSD.

The Cisco website above only mentions Phobos and FreeBSD, but the Phobos
website just says 'email for other operating systems'.


Carl.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Jan 14 19:07:02 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA02630
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 19:07:02 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from gjp.erols.com (alex-va-n008c079.moon.jic.com [206.156.18.89])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA02623
          for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 19:07:01 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from gjp@gjp.erols.com)
Received: from gjp.erols.com (localhost.erols.com [127.0.0.1])
	by gjp.erols.com (8.9.1/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA80644;
	Thu, 14 Jan 1999 22:05:40 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from gjp@gjp.erols.com)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.1 12/23/97
To: Carl Makin <carl@xena.IPAustralia.gov.au>
cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
From: "Gary Palmer" <gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: Cisco/Intel Ethernet Trunking 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 15 Jan 1999 13:56:33 +1100."
             <Pine.BSF.4.01.9901151349560.492-100000@newton.aipo.gov.au> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 22:05:40 -0500
Message-ID: <80640.916369540@gjp.erols.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Carl Makin wrote in message ID
<Pine.BSF.4.01.9901151349560.492-100000@newton.aipo.gov.au>:
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/729/fec/fchan_an.htm

``News to me'' :)

> I did get it slightly wrong though, It was a magazine, Asia-Pacific Data
> Communications, December 1998 issue, page 64/65, that says both Intel and
> Phobos make cards with Fast Etherchannel support that is supported under
> FreeBSD.

Hrm. Maybe they're confused. I believe Intel has drivers for the EtherExpress 
Pro 100 series that support EtherChannel, but I don't know of native FreeBSD 
support.

> The Cisco website above only mentions Phobos and FreeBSD, but the Phobos
> website just says 'email for other operating systems'.

That smells like they support EtherChannel on their 4 port card with a custom 
driver, but I could be wrong.

Gary
--
Gary Palmer                                          FreeBSD Core Team Member
FreeBSD: Turning PC's into workstations. See http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/ for info



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Jan 14 19:10:11 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA03129
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 19:10:11 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from beatrice.rutgers.edu (beatrice.rutgers.edu [165.230.209.143])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA03088
          for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 19:10:04 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from easmith@beatrice.rutgers.edu)
Received: (from easmith@localhost) by beatrice.rutgers.edu (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id WAA05750; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 22:08:04 -0500 (EST)
From: "Allen Smith" <easmith@beatrice.rutgers.edu>
Message-Id: <9901142208.ZM5749@beatrice.rutgers.edu>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 22:08:04 -0500
In-Reply-To: Carl Makin <carl@xena.IPAustralia.gov.au>       "Cisco/Intel Ethernet Trunking" (Jan 14,  9:28pm)
References: <Pine.BSF.4.01.9901151325050.492-100000@newton.aipo.gov.au>
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.3 08feb96 MediaMail)
To: Carl Makin <carl@xena.IPAustralia.gov.au>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG,
        chrisy@flix.net
Subject: Re: Cisco/Intel Ethernet Trunking
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Jan 14,  9:28pm, Carl Makin (possibly) wrote:
> 
> Cisco seems to think that FreeBSD supports ethernet trunking, where
> multiple fxp cards in the machine connect to multiple 100BaseT ports on
> the switch and all appear as 1 "port" at 100/200/300/400 MB/s.
> 
> Is this actually supported in stable?  If so how do you set it up?

See ftp://ftp.flirble.org/pub/unix/hacks/FreeBSD/mpath. This work is
still in progress; one thing that would be good for this would be
doing packet output to the least-loaded interface, instead of via the
current round-robin method.

	-Allen

-- 
Allen Smith				easmith@beatrice.rutgers.edu
	

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Jan 14 19:53:08 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA08149
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 19:53:08 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (dingo.cdrom.com [204.216.28.145])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA08142;
          Thu, 14 Jan 1999 19:53:05 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com)
Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1])
	by dingo.cdrom.com (8.9.1/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA03002;
	Thu, 14 Jan 1999 19:48:46 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com)
Message-Id: <199901150348.TAA03002@dingo.cdrom.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98
To: Carl Makin <carl@xena.IPAustralia.gov.au>
cc: Gary Palmer <gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Cisco/Intel Ethernet Trunking 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 15 Jan 1999 13:56:33 +1100."
             <Pine.BSF.4.01.9901151349560.492-100000@newton.aipo.gov.au> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 19:48:46 -0800
From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> 
> On Thu, 14 Jan 1999, Gary Palmer wrote:
> 
> > Carl Makin wrote
> 
> >> Cisco seems to think that FreeBSD supports ethernet trunking
> 
> > Where did they say that?
> 
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/729/fec/fchan_an.htm
> 
> I did get it slightly wrong though, It was a magazine, Asia-Pacific Data
> Communications, December 1998 issue, page 64/65, that says both Intel and
> Phobos make cards with Fast Etherchannel support that is supported under
> FreeBSD.
> 
> The Cisco website above only mentions Phobos and FreeBSD, but the Phobos
> website just says 'email for other operating systems'.

I haven't seen anything recently from Phobos; I'd hope that Kevin Van 
Maren can comment more on this.  Certainly I understood that Phobos 
intended their Phobos Link code to run on FreeBSD.  Whether it's 
available or not yet I'm not sure.

-- 
\\  Sometimes you're ahead,       \\  Mike Smith
\\  sometimes you're behind.      \\  mike@smith.net.au
\\  The race is long, and in the  \\  msmith@freebsd.org
\\  end it's only with yourself.  \\  msmith@cdrom.com



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Jan 14 20:31:00 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA12939
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 20:31:00 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA12926
          for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 20:30:50 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net)
Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218])
	by ns1.yes.no (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id FAA00303;
	Fri, 15 Jan 1999 05:29:35 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from eivind@localhost)
	by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id FAA01397;
	Fri, 15 Jan 1999 05:29:35 +0100 (MET)
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 05:29:35 +0100
From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@FreeBSD.ORG>
To: Jeremy Shaffner <jer@jorsm.com>
Cc: freebsd-errata-update@roguetrader.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: ERRATA NOTICE: FreeBSD 2.2.8-RELEASE
Message-ID: <19990115052935.D362@bitbox.follo.net>
References: <199901071300.GAA22022@ice.cold.org> <Pine.BSF.3.95q.990114160610.24274D-100000@mercury.jorsm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.1i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.990114160610.24274D-100000@mercury.jorsm.com>; from Jeremy Shaffner on Thu, Jan 14, 1999 at 04:09:50PM -0600
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Thu, Jan 14, 1999 at 04:09:50PM -0600, Jeremy Shaffner wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jan 1999 freebsd-errata-update@roguetrader.com wrote:
> 
> >      user name.  To correct this behaviour, libc needs to be patched and
> >      recompiled.  The appropriate patch can be obtained from
> >      http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/lib/libc/gen/getpwent.c.diff?r1=1.35.2.2&r2=1.35.2.3
> 
> Ok..I've fetched and patched getpwent.c.  So now what?  `make install`?
> >From what directory?

Rebuild the entire libc and do 'make install'.

% cd /usr/src/lib/libc && make && make install

Eivind, who fixed that bug and wonders who added it to the erratta...

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Jan 14 21:35:11 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA21400
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 21:35:11 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from obie.softweyr.com ([204.68.178.33])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA21384;
          Thu, 14 Jan 1999 21:35:06 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com)
Received: from softweyr.com (zaphod.softweyr.com [204.68.178.35])
	by obie.softweyr.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA08985;
	Thu, 14 Jan 1999 22:33:55 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from wes@softweyr.com)
Message-ID: <369ED343.F66B039D@softweyr.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 22:33:55 -0700
From: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>
Organization: Softweyr llc
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 3.0-RELEASE i386)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gary Palmer <gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG>
CC: Carl Makin <carl@xena.IPAustralia.gov.au>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Cisco/Intel Ethernet Trunking
References: <80640.916369540@gjp.erols.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Gary Palmer wrote:
> 
> > The Cisco website above only mentions Phobos and FreeBSD, but the Phobos
> > website just says 'email for other operating systems'.
> 
> That smells like they support EtherChannel on their 4 port card with a custom
> driver, but I could be wrong.

If you want to find out for sure, email chris.bodily@phobos.com, and
tell him I sent you.  More announcments from Phobos are certain to
appear in the next few months, some of which will be FreeBSD related.

-- 
       "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"

Wes Peters                                                 Softweyr LLC
http://www.softweyr.com/~softweyr                      wes@softweyr.com

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Jan 15 09:37:36 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA13528
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 15 Jan 1999 09:37:36 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from science-guy.npt.nuwc.navy.mil (relay.npt.nuwc.navy.mil [164.223.71.1])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA13511
          for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 15 Jan 1999 09:37:27 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from tod@science-guy.npt.nuwc.navy.mil)
Received: from science-guy.npt.nuwc.navy.mil (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by science-guy.npt.nuwc.navy.mil (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA02102;
	Fri, 15 Jan 1999 12:41:26 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from tod@science-guy.npt.nuwc.navy.mil)
Message-ID: <369F7DC6.9CB54B6C@science-guy.npt.nuwc.navy.mil>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 12:41:26 -0500
From: Tod Luginbuhl <tod@science-guy.npt.nuwc.navy.mil>
Reply-To: t.e.luginbuhl@ieee.org
Organization: Code 2121, Naval Undersea Warfare Center
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.07 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.8-RELEASE i386)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Problem with telnetd and gettytab if capability
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hi,
Several months ago I noticed that when I telneted to my FreeBSD machine,
telnetd responded normally, but then kick me off just prior to getting a
logic prompt.  I've looked into the problem on and off, but didn't
really understand what was going on. Since I didn't see anything in the
mail archives on this problem, I figured I had configured something
incorrectly.  Finally, I got desperate and did a new installed
2.2.8-STABLE from the CDs.  The telnet problem was still there, so I dug
into it.  I guessed that my /etc/issue file was too long and
experimented with a test file.  I found that the /etc/issue file must
contain no more than 1011 bytes for telnetd to work.  telnetd  sort of
works when /etc/issue contains 1012 bytes but generates alot of ptyflush
char errors.  If the /etc/issue files contains more than 1012 bytes,
telnetd kicks out just before giving a login prompt.  I briefly looked
at the source for telnetd, but didn't see anything obvious.  This
problem does not exist in 3.0-RELEASE, and I haven't done a diff between
telnetd.c in 2.2.8 and 3.0 to see what is different in handling the if
capability.  But having gotten this far, I thought I'd inform the list.

Tod



------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tod Luginbuhl                         email:  t.e.luginbuhl@ieee.org
Code 2121                                    
luginbuhl@npt.nuwc.navy.mil
Naval Undersea Warfare Center
1176 Howell Street                    Telephone: (401) 832-8241
Newport, Rhode Island                 FAX:       (401) 832-7453
02841-1708
USA

"Don't argue with drunks and fanatics!" -- Sun Wolf (Barbara Hambly)

------------------------------------------------------------------------

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Jan 16 11:56:10 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA15939
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 11:56:10 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from vine.vine.com (vine.vine.com [204.188.68.11])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA15933
          for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 11:56:08 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from ksh@vine.vine.com)
Received: (from ksh@localhost)
	by vine.vine.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA29704
	for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 11:56:04 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from ksh)
From: "Kent S. Harris" <ksh@vine.com>
Message-Id: <199901161956.LAA29704@vine.vine.com>
Subject: setpgid(2) doesn't work as advertised
To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 11:56:04 -0800 (PST)
Organization: Vine Technology
X-Phone: 408-996-1294
X-URL: http://www.vine.com/
X-Pgp-Key-Location: http://www.vine.com/pgpkey.html
X-Pgp-Key-Fingerprint: 16 D1 43 18 03 0D AD E7  F0 D8 DA 86 CA 2D 0B 4E
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


Perhaps the wrong forum for this, but I'm not a subscriber to
freebsd-bugs.

The manual page for setpgid(2) is wrong.  It claims the target process
must either be a child of the invoker OR have the same effective
user-id.

That is wrong.  If the target is not a child of the process, setpgid(2)
will return ESRCH (see kern_prot.c).

I believe the manual is correct and the kernel code is wrong.  Frequently
in industrial situations, an "area controller" process on a particular
CPU will spawn a number of sub-processes that perform various tasks
such as control special devices.  One of the tasks of the "area
controller" is to reap its children and re-spawn them should they 
unexpectedly abort.

So far no problem.  However, in a situation where the "area controller"
aborts and is restarted (usually manually), it may want to reclaim its
original children to the process group so it can once again reap
the SIGCHLD signals.  To do so it must insert the children into
its new process group via setpgrp.  No can do.

Comments?

- Kent Harris

---
Kent S. Harris  | http://www.vine.com/ | Networks, WWW Security, Real
Vine Technology | mailto:ksh@vine.com  | Time Systems, ASIC Modeling,
(408)996-1294   |  IEEE ACM USENIX     | Custom Hardware/Software

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Jan 16 21:11:20 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA04062
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 21:11:20 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from sturm.canonware.com (canonware.com [204.107.140.54])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA04057
          for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 21:11:19 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jasone@canonware.com)
Received: from localhost (jasone@localhost)
	by sturm.canonware.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA02177
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 21:05:13 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jasone@canonware.com)
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 21:05:13 -0800 (PST)
From: Jason Evans <jasone@canonware.com>
To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: connect() returns EAGAIN
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9901162056220.27422-100000@sturm.canonware.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I've been working on some code that does a non-blocking socket connect().
According to the manpage and Stevens's UNP 2nd Ed., connect() should
return EINPROGRESS if the connection isn't able to be established
immediately.  -stable returns EAGAIN instead.  EAGAIN appears to be an
invalid return value for connect().  This problem doesn't appear to exist
under -current.

Is this the sort of thing that is likely to get fixed in the 2.2.x branch
at this point, or is this too insignificant to fix now?

Thanks,
Jason

Jason Evans <jasone@canonware.com>
http://www.canonware.com/~jasone
Home phone: (650) 856-8204
Work phone: (415) 808-8742
"I once knew a happy medium.  Her name was Zohar." - James Foster


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Jan 16 21:19:37 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA04794
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 21:19:37 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from implode.root.com (root.com [208.221.12.98])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA04789
          for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 21:19:36 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from root@implode.root.com)
Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by implode.root.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA05557;
	Sat, 16 Jan 1999 21:16:32 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199901170516.VAA05557@implode.root.com>
To: Jason Evans <jasone@canonware.com>
cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: connect() returns EAGAIN 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 16 Jan 1999 21:05:13 PST."
             <Pine.BSF.4.05.9901162056220.27422-100000@sturm.canonware.com> 
From: David Greenman <dg@root.com>
Reply-To: dg@root.com
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 21:16:32 -0800
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>I've been working on some code that does a non-blocking socket connect().
>According to the manpage and Stevens's UNP 2nd Ed., connect() should
>return EINPROGRESS if the connection isn't able to be established
>immediately.  -stable returns EAGAIN instead.  EAGAIN appears to be an
>invalid return value for connect().  This problem doesn't appear to exist
>under -current.
>
>Is this the sort of thing that is likely to get fixed in the 2.2.x branch
>at this point, or is this too insignificant to fix now?

   The 2.2.x branch is escentially dead. I suppose someone might commit a
security fix of some sort, but no further releases will be made from it.

-DG

David Greenman
Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Jan 16 23:44:09 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA14659
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 23:44:09 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from freeway.dcfinc.com (cx74889-a.phnx3.az.home.com [24.1.193.157])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA14654
          for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 23:44:07 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from chad@freeway.dcfinc.com)
Received: (from chad@localhost)
	by freeway.dcfinc.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA01343
	for stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 17 Jan 1999 00:44:05 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from chad)
From: "Chad R. Larson" <chad@freeway.dcfinc.com>
Message-Id: <199901170744.AAA01343@freeway.dcfinc.com>
Subject: gdb documentation
To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 1999 00:44:05 -0700 (MST)
Reply-to: chad@DCFinc.com
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I have a GDB manual from 1989 (version 3.4) that I generated in a
prior lifetime.  I set out to do the same thing for the version of
GDB (4.16) that is part of FreeBSD.  This is on a 2.2.8-Stable system.

I successfully built TeX and MetaFont.  I built dvips.  I built
Ghostscript and integrated it with my printer spooler.

I generated "refcard.ps" from the distributed "refcard.dvi" and
printed it.

So, emboldened, I went to /usr/src/contrib/gdb/gdb/doc to try to
make the manual.  However, it was clear from the existance of
"Makefile.in" and "configure.in" without their matching files that
"configure" had not been run for this build.  Apparently not
necessary for a "make world".  However, a "./configure" from
/usr/src/contrib/gdb fails.  First being unable to locate a "install-sh".
If I copy one of those into its path from some other GNU directory
it then fails with a missing "config.sub" file.

Should the -stable tree be able to build GNU documentation from any of
the subdirectories?

What steps should I take to generate a current GDB manual?

	-crl
--
Chad R. Larson (CRL15)   602-953-1392   Brother, can you paradigm?
chad@dcfinc.com chad@larsons.org chad@anasazi.com larson1@home.net   
DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message